IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NATIONAL ENTITLED WORKERS UNION. NANA KEISHO NO (Case Management of the CCMA)
|
|
- Lesley Hall
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN CASE JR 685/02 In the matter between NATIONAL ENTITLED WORKERS UNION Applicant and COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION First respondent NANA KEISHO NO (Case Management of the CCMA) Second respondent GEORGE LALETA MANGANYI Third respondent THE MINISTRY: JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Fourth respondent THE MINISTER: JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA (HOUNOURABLE MINISTER P MADUNA) Fifth respondent
2 MINISTRY: LABOUR, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Sixth respondent THE MINISTER OF LABOUR, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA (HONOURABLE MINISTER MEMBATHISI MDLANA) Seventh respondent JUDGMENT LANDMAN J: This is an application to review a decision of a case management officer (CMO) of the Commissioner for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration. The CMO declined to accept a referral of an alleged unfair practice dispute referred to the CCMA by the National Entitled Workers Union (NEWU). It is also an application for an order of the invalidity of the LRA and the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 consequential relief. NEWU is a trade union that is registered in terms of s 96(7)(a) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of It employed Mr G L Manganyi, the third respondent, as a union official on 1 February Mr Manganyi was elected to the executive council and became the deputy president of the union on 21 March The appointment is for a two year period. He resigned from the union on 6 April His letter of resignation states: 2
3 Due to the manner/way in which this Organization is being run I feel that it is impossible for me to continue working and serving on the Board of this Organization, as such kindly be advised my services at NEWU are being terminated with immediate effect. Mr Manganyi did not, as an employee, give the three month s notice required by clause 11(2) of NEWU s constitution. Neither did he give the three month s notice required from a member of the executive committee by clause 10(4)(c) of the constitution. He did not tender to pay any amount in lieu of notice. He was earning R3036 at the date of his resignation. On the day of his resignation, Mr Manganyi commenced employment with SANWU, presumably a trade union. NEWU was distressed about the resignation and decided to refer the matter to the CCMA as an unfair labour practice. On 16 April 2002 a notice of referral was delivered to the CCMA and Mr Maganyi. On 18 April the CMO advised NEWU that: We are in receipt of the above referral for conciliation. However, the case has been closed due to the fact that the CCMA lacks jurisdiction to entertain the matter as it does not amount to [an] unfair labour practice in terms of the LRA 66 of NEWU seeks to review this decision on the grounds that: (a) it was made without affording NEWU an opportunity to be heard; and (b) it is invalid as it is inconsistent with ss 9, 23(1) and 34 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa of
4 At the time NEWU referred its dispute to the CCMA, residual unfair labour practices were regulated by item 2(1) of part B of Schedule 7 to the LRA as amended. This item read: For the purpose of this item, an unfair labour practice means any unfair act or omission that arises between an employer and an employee, involving (a). (b) the unfair conduct of the employer relating to the promotion, demotion or training of an employee or relating to the provision of benefits to an employee; (c) the unfair suspension of an employee or any other disciplinary action short of dismissal in respect of an employer; (d) the failure or refusal of an employer to reinstate or re-employ a former employee in terms of any agreement. See also item 2(3) and (4) of the 7 th Schedule regarding the procedure for processing an unfair labour practice dispute and remedies. Item 2 has itself been repealed by the Labour Relations Amendment Act 12 of Unfair labour practices are now regulated by ss 185, 191, 193 and 194 of the LRA. The concept of an unfair labour practice contemplated by item 2 does not embrace a labour practice committed by an employee vis-a-vis an employer. The CMO (and by implication the CCMA) correctly refused to accept NEWU s referral. NEWU knew that the concept of an unfair labour practice did not embrace its complaint. No purpose would have been served by affording NEWU a hearing. In the result the application to review and set aside the decision of the CMO must be dismissed. 4
5 This brings me to the constitutional issues raised by NEWU. In brief NEWU seeks an order declaring that the LRA and the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 infringe NEWU s and other employers constitutional rights and are invalid (or at least partially so). It is submitted that these Acts infringe employer s rights to equality and equal protection and benefit of these laws and their right to have a dispute about the fairness of the resignation of an employee from service resolved by the application of law in a fair public hearing before the CCMA, Labour Court or another independent and impartial tribunal. Other relief consequent on this is also sought. I have stated earlier that an unfair labour practice in item 2(1) of the 7 th Schedule restricts this concept to an act or omission by an employer. The EEA does not use the concept of an unfair labour practice. Section 23(1) of the Constitution provides that: Everyone has the right to fair labour practices. What is a fair labour practice as contemplated by the Constitution? The Constitution does not contain a definition of the concept. It is not capable of precise definition. See National Union of Health and Allied Works v University of Cape Town and Others (2003) 24 ILJ 95 (CC) at para 33. Of course, the converse of a fair labour practice is an unfair labour practice and this is what is prohibited. For the purposes of this matter it is sufficient to limit a discussion of the meaning of a fair labour practice to the following: (a) The concept of a fair labour practice, as it was understood in our law from its introduction in the Labour Relations Act 28 of 1956 (including successive definitions), recognizes the rightful place of equity and fairness in the workplace. In particular the concept recognizes that what is 5
6 lawful may be unfair. T Poolman neatly summarises the strength and nature of the concept. He says in Principles of Unfair Labour Practice (Juta) at 11: The concept `unfair labour practice is an expression of the consciousness of modern society of the value for the rights, welfare, security and dignity of the individual and groups of individuals in labour practices. The protection envisaged by the legislature in prohibiting unfair labour practices underpins the reality that human conduct cannot be legislated for in precise terms. The law cannot anticipate the boundaries of fairness or unfairness of labour practices. The complex nature of labour practices does not allow for such rigid regulation of what is fair or unfair in any particular circumstance. Labour practices draw their strength from the inherent flexibility of the concept `fair. This flexibility provides a means of giving effect to the demands of modern industrial society for the development of an equitable, systematized body of labour law. The flexibility of `fairness will amplify existing labour law in satisfying the needs for which the law itself is too rigid. It seem to me clear that the concept of a fair labour practice, as contemplated in s 23 of the Constitution, is concerned that labour practices should not only be lawful but also fair. (b) The notion of parity between the rights of employers and employees is not an absolute one. But it has an important place in labour law. An employee may, in limited circumstances, commit conduct vis-à-vis an employer that may be lawful but unfair. An employer has the right to expect that in certain circumstances an employee will not merely comply with his or her rights in regard to the employer but will also act fairly. This conduct may, in my view, qualify as an unfair labour practice, ie a practice that is contrary to that contemplated by s 23 of the Constitution. A lawful resignation that is also, in the circumstances, unfair may constitute an unfair labour practice. Cf 6
7 Penrose Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Clark (1993) 14 ILJ 1558 (LC) which dealt with the definition of an unfair labour practice contained in s 1(1) of the Labour Relations Act 28 of (c) Apart from an intention to accommodate fairness and equity in a flexible way, the concept, as contemplated by the Constitution, envisages the conventional use of the law to regulate labour practices broadly defined ie the inter action between employers and employees (and their agents) regarding workplace relations. The regulation of labour relations and practices by means of conventional statutes (which conform to the goals expressed in the Constitution) are, in my view, contemplated by the terms of s 23(1) of the Constitution. (d) Rules of common law and in particular the contract of employment, to the extent that they are compatible with constitutional goals and values, are I consider, are embraced by the concept. The contract of employment gives rise to rights and duties that can be construed as a fair labour practice (to the extent that it does conform with the requirements mentioned above). A breach of the contract of employment, which is unfair to an employer, may give rise to an unfair labour practice. Although item 2 of the 7th Schedule does not embrace the commission of an unfair labour practice by an employee against an employer this does not mean that the item, which has been repealed, is unconstitutional. In my opinion it means no more than that the LRA, in this instance, does not give effect to s 23 of the Constitution. Logically the LRA should be the home of the prohibition on an unfair labour practice committed by an employee. A principal purpose of the LRA is to give effect to and regulate the fundamental rights conferred by s 27 of the Constitution. See s 1 of the LRA. The reference to s 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa of 1993 is to be read as a reference to s 23 of the present Constitution. The LRA is not intended to regulate exhaustively the entire concept of a fair labour practice as contemplated 7
8 in the Constitution of 1993 nor the present Constitution. The field is far too wide for to be contemplated by single statute. NEWU did not need to rely on the broad, flexible, equity basis of an unfair labour discussed above. NEWU had a number of remedies available to it in order to address the consequences of the resignation of Mr Manganyi, the labour practice which NEWU regarded as unfair. It could have sought an interdict in the form of a mandamus compelling him to adhere to the terms of the contract. See Santos Professional Football Club (Pty) Ltd v Igesund and Another (2002) 23 ILJ 2001 (C). NEWU could have sued him for three month s salary in lieu of notice. Should NEWU wish to prohibit a labour practice which is unfair and which is not regulated by a conventional statute NEWU may approach a court of competent jurisdiction relying on s 23 of the Constitution to grant the relief which it seeks. This would not contribute to two parallel streams of labour law which as remarked in NAPTOSA and Others v Minister of Education, Western Cape and Others 2001 (2) SA 112 (C) be singularly inappropriate. I express no opinion whether it would be successful on its particular facts or not. NEWU has prayed for alternative relief but this is not a matter where alternative relief should be considered. In the result the application is dismissed. SIGNED AND DATED AT MAFIKENG THIS 6 TH DAY OF OCTOBER
9 A A Landman Judge of the Labour Court 9
A CRITIQUE OF THE LEGAL TECHNIQUE OF MANAGING ABSCONDING EMPLOYEES IN SOUTH AFRICA
A CRITIQUE OF THE LEGAL TECHNIQUE OF MANAGING ABSCONDING EMPLOYEES IN SOUTH AFRICA INTRODUCTION South Africa is a constitutional democracy and its constitution contains the Bill of Rights in Chapter 2.
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT
Of interest to other judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Case no: JR 2026/13 In the matter between: NATIONAL HOME BUILDERS First Applicant REGISTRATION COUNCIL and NEHAWU obo
ELRC PRESENTATION ON JURISDICTION
ELRC PRESENTATION ON JURISDICTION 1 In this clause 14, a dispute means any dispute other than a mutual interest dispute that a party must or may elect to refer to the General Secretary in terms of a statute
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGEMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGEMENT Reportable Case No: JR 738/16 In the matter between: FAMOUS BRANDS MANAGEMENT COMPANY (PTY) LTD Applicant and COMMISSION FOR
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT PONTSHO BLESSING MOTSHEKGA
1 THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: JR 2245/12 In the matter between: PONTSHO BLESSING MOTSHEKGA Applicant and THE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Case no: J 1251/13 In the matter between: THE LABOUR GROUP THE PERSONS LISTED ON ANNEXURE A First Applicant Second
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG EXXARO COAL MPUMALANGA (PTY) LTD MATLA COAL
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not reportable Case No: JR1288/12 In the matter between: EXXARO COAL MPUMALANGA (PTY) LTD MATLA COAL Applicant And NUM obo STIGLING & ANOTHER First Respondent
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Not reportable Of interest to other judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN JUDGMENT Case no: C 853/15 In the matter between: ARMSCOR DOCKYARD, a division of ARMSCOR
MTA EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS FACT SHEET
MTA EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS FACT SHEET FAIR WORK ACT 2009 UNFAIR AND UNLAWFUL DISMISSAL 18 September 2009 Operative: On and from 1 July 2009 A fair go all round The Fair Work Act 2009 Part 3-2 Unfair dismissal
Human Resources Manual Phatshoane Henney inc. 2008
Human Resources Manual Phatshoane Henney inc. 2008 www.cilreyn.co.za P a g e 2 o f 5 1. PURPOSE To ensure the application of consistent, fair and legal industrial action procedures and practices at the
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT. SOLIDARITY obo S W PARKINSON
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not reportable Case no. JR2792/12 In the matter between: SOLIDARITY obo S W PARKINSON Applicant and DAMELIN (PTY) LTD COMMISSIONER
Department of Health- Northern Cape
ARBITRATION AWARD Case No: PSHS1162-16/17 Commissioner: Gerald Jacobs Date of award: 16 November 2017 In the matter between: NEHAWU obo Themba N and others (Union/ Applicant) and Department of Health-
Regulated Flexibility: Revisiting the LRA and the BCEA
Regulated Flexibility: Revisiting the LRA and the BCEA DPRU Policy Brief Series Development Policy Research Unit School of Economics University of Cape Town Upper Campus July 2007 PB 07-12 ISBN No: 978-1-920055-48-6
EMPLOYEE OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS DISMISSALS & RESTRUCTURING
EMPLOYEE OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS DISMISSALS & RESTRUCTURING What will be covered: 1. Defining and operational requirements dismissal 2. UKZN s employment contractual obligations 3. UKZN s Retrenchment
Stay up to date with the latest developments in Labour law EDITION 8/2016. Labour Newsflash
Stay up to date with the latest developments in Labour law EDITION 8/2016 Welcome to the next edition of the Labour Newsflash Labour Newsflash We live in the time of change and innovation. This too has
TRAINYOUCAN Accredited Training Network - EMPLOYMENT EQUITY PROPOSED AMENDMENTS planned for 2014
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED EMPLOYMENT EQUITY AMENDMENTS PLANNED FOR 2014-1/14 TRAINYOUCAN Accredited Training Network www.trainyoucan.co.za - info@trainyoucan.co.za EMPLOYMENT EQUITY PROPOSED AMENDMENTS planned
ARBITRATION AWARD. Ananthan Sanjivi Dorasamy. In the ARBITRATION between: HOSPERSA O B O WESTWOOD R (Union / Applicant) and
ARBITRATION AWARD Panellist/s: Case No.: Date of Award: Ananthan Sanjivi Dorasamy PSHS313-11/12 21-Feb-2012 In the ARBITRATION between: HOSPERSA O B O WESTWOOD R (Union / Applicant) and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH:
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Sanbar Holdings P/L v Queensland Heritage Council & Ors [2007] QSC 116 PARTIES: SANBAR HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 092 408 921) (applicant) v QUEENSLAND HERITAGE COUNCIL
JUDGMENT. [1] The applicant, the Public Servants Association (PSA) on behalf of its member,
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: JR 388/07 In the matter between: PUBLIC SERVANTS ASSOCIATION OF SA OBO P W J DE BRUYN APPLICANT AND MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY 1 ST
Grievance Policy. Version: 2.3. Status: Final. Title of originator/author: Human Resources Directorate. Name of responsible director:
Grievance Policy Version: 2.3 Status: Title of originator/author: Name of responsible director: Developed/revised by group/committee and Date: Approved by group/committee and Date: Final Human Resources
STEVENS & ASSOCIATES LAWYERS
In our November 2018 edition of Vision in the Workplace we explore the Fair Work Commission's (FWC) recent decision against Foodora that could have significant implications for the Australian 'gigeconomy'.
NOTICE 602 OF (Govenrment Gazette 34573) CCMA GUIDELINES: MISCONDUCT ARBITRATIONS GUIDELINES ON MISCONDUCT ARBITRATIONS
NOTICE 602 OF 2011 (Govenrment Gazette 34573) CCMA GUIDELINES: MISCONDUCT ARBITRATIONS GUIDELINES ON MISCONDUCT ARBITRATIONS PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION IN TERMS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC SERVANTS ASSOCIATION OBO H CILLIERS JUDGMENT
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT CAPE TOWN not reportable Case No: C36/2010 In the matter between: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT Applicant And CARLTON JOHNSON N.O. First
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT PORT ELIZABETH) AND ALLIED WORKERS UNION AND OTHERS First Applicant
Page 1 of 9 IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT PORT ELIZABETH) CASE NO. P180/05 In the matter between: CHEMICAL, ENERGY, PAPER, PRINTING, WOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS UNION AND OTHERS First Applicant
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN CAPE TOWN CASE NO: C 277/05. In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN CLOTHING AND TEXTILE WORKER S UNION
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN CAPE TOWN 277/05 CASE NO: C In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN CLOTHING AND TEXTILE WORKER S UNION APPLICANT FIRST J HEYNES SECOND APPLICANT AND CADEMA INDUSTRIES
Proposed Changes to the LRA regarding Labour Broking
Proposed Changes to the LRA regarding Labour Broking What the current LRA says Section 198 of the current LRA provides for the following: 1. A definition of who a labour broker worker is works for a client
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN REASONS FOR THE ORDER BRAVO GROUP MANUFACTURERS (PTY) LTD
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN REASONS FOR THE ORDER Not reportable In the matter between: BRAVO GROUP MANUFACTURERS (PTY) LTD Case no.: D749/2013 Applicant And VINO
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN Not Reportable ETHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY
1 IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN Not Reportable Case no: D 285/15 In the matter between: ETHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY Applicant And IMATU obo R NAIDOO THE SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT BARGAINING
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT
Reportable Of interest to other judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Case no: J 2834/16 J 2845/16 In the matter between: AMCU AMCU MEMBERS First applicant Second and further applicants
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, EASSTERN CAPE JURISDICTIONAL RUILING
IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE CO-ORDINATING BARGAINING COUNCIL HELD AT PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO: NEHAWU obo PETROS APPLICANT and DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, EASSTERN CAPE RESPONDENT JURISDICTIONAL RUILING Background
OLGA KOSHEVA AND OTHERS APPLICANT GAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FIRST RESPONDENT PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE SECTORBARGAINING COUNCIL THIRD RESPONDENT
1IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN JOHANNESBURG In the matter between: CASE NO: JR 2328/05 OLGA KOSHEVA AND OTHERS APPLICANT AND GAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FIRST RESPONDENT MR C S MBILENI N.O
NUMSA v Assign Services & Others
NUMSA v Assign Services & Others (2017) 38 ILJ 1978 (LAC) Neil Coetzer Partner, Cowan-Harper Attorneys Research Fellow, University of the Free State Overview Debate over labour brokers has been raging
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT NO 55 OF 1998
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT NO 55 OF 1998 [ASSENTED TO 12 OCTOBER, 1998] (ENGLISH TEXT SIGNED BY THE PRESIDENT [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 DECEMBER, 1999] (unless otherwise indicated) as amended by Intelligence
LABOUR LAW. ARR 214 Theme 9
LABOUR LAW ARR 214 Theme 9 THEME 9 I N D I V I D U A L L A B O U R D I S P U T E S : U N F A I R L A B O U R P R A C T I C E S P G L ( 2 0 0 6 : 3 0 1-3 1 8 ) ; W L ( 2 0 0 9 : 7 3-9 2 ) ; P L L ( 2 0
Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 to 2001
Explanatory Booklet for Employers and Employees Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 to 2001 Explanatory Booklet This book is intended to give a general guidance to employers and employees about the Unfair Dismissals
Statutory Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures What s All the Fuss About?
October 2004 Statutory Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures What s All the Fuss About? The Employment Act 2002 ( EA ) established a framework for promoting the resolution of employment disputes in the
ARBITRATION AWARD. Case Number: PSHS200-11/12 (PSHS431-11/12) Commissioner: Abraham Nthako Date of Award: 14-June In the matter between.
ARBITRATION AWARD Case Number: PSHS200-11/12 (PSHS431-11/12) Commissioner: Abraham Nthako Date of Award: 14-June -2012 In the matter between Kramer Wiehmann & Joubert obo Mokgothu & Mofokeng (Union/Applicant)
Regulation pertaining to the grievance procedure for academic staff
Regulation pertaining to the grievance procedure for academic staff Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Informal action... 3 3. Formal action... 3 Appendix A: Schedule of Ordinances and Regulations...
Service Managers Understanding Labour Law & its Application TANTO
Service Managers Understanding Labour Law & its Application TANTO This module will give you a high level overview into this very complex Act with the view of understanding and applying it in your workplace.
ARBITRATION AWARD. Panellist: C S Mbileni Case No: PSHS /14 Date of award: 5 August In the ARBITRATION between: and
ARBITRATION AWARD Panellist: C S Mbileni Case No: PSHS1034-13/14 Date of award: 5 August 2014 In the ARBITRATION between: HOSPERSA obo MAKHUBELA Roy V Applicant Party and Department of Health: Mpumalanga
NHS Organisation. Grievance Policy
NHS Organisation Grievance Policy Approved by: Welsh Partnership Forum Issue date: 10 March 2016 Review date: March 2019 1 (10/03/16) C O N T E N T S 1. Introduction 2. Scope 3. Purpose 4. Rights to be
FACT SHEET Termination Provisions
FACT SHEET Termination Provisions Updated: July 2018 Replaces: July 2017 The Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act ) contains termination of employment provisions for employers subject to the federal workplace relations
JELE v PREMIER OF THE PROVINCE OF KWAZULU-NATAL & OTHERS JUDGEMENT
JELE v PREMIER OF THE PROVINCE OF KWAZULU-NATAL & OTHERS FORUM : LABOUR COURT JUDGE : PILLAY J CASE NO : D 1772/01 DATE : 2 MAY 2003 JUDGEMENT Judgment: Pillay J: [1] This review turns on whether the application
2013 Bill 28. First Session, 28th Legislature, 62 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 28 MODERNIZING REGIONAL GOVERNANCE ACT
2013 Bill 28 First Session, 28th Legislature, 62 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 28 MODERNIZING REGIONAL GOVERNANCE ACT THE MINISTER OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS First Reading.......................................................
Models of Workplace Dispute Resolution in the UK
*MODEL FOR MEDIATION - A tool for equal opportunities on the labour market Models of Workplace Dispute Resolution in the UK COUNTRY REPORT United Kingdom Val Stansfield The union for people in transport
unfair dismissal and redundancy
Unite Legal Services Summary of the law on unfair dismissal and redundancy www.unitetheunion.org 2 Contents About this booklet 3 Unfair dismissal? 3 What about strikes and lock outs? 5 What is the procedure
Abbreviations/ Acronyms
LABOUR RELATIONS AMENDMENT ACT NO 6 OF 2014 Prepared by CLSO BC: CCMA: ESC: LAC: Abbreviations/ Acronyms Bargaining Council Commission for Conciliation, Mediation & Arbitration Essential Services Commission
COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT. between ERISSA YONG WILSON INC. represented by THE COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES EMPLOYERS ASSOCIATION. and the
COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT between ERISSA YONG WILSON INC. represented by THE COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES EMPLOYERS ASSOCIATION and the B.C. GOVERNMENT AND SERVICE EMPLOYEES UNION April 1, 1995 to March 31, 1997
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable In the matter between: Case No: JR 214/2016 CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY Applicant and SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS
Employee termination decisions and contract non-renewal decisions are not subject to the informal resolution process.
MARATHON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 527 EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE 1 Informal Resolution: An employee 2 with a complaint related to employee discipline (except employee termination) or workplace
WHITELEY PRE SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE. 1.1 The disciplinary procedure applies to all members of staff, volunteers and committee members.
WHITELEY PRE SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The disciplinary procedure applies to all members of staff, volunteers and committee members. 1.2 The procedure will be applied in accordance
UNIVERSITIES ACT, 1997 UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK STATUTE NO. 4
UNIVERSITIES ACT, 1997 UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK STATUTE NO. 4 Approved by Governing Authority 26 November 2002 UNIVERSITIES ACT, 1997 UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK We, the governing authority of the University
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Case no: JR 2228-13 Reportable In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS UNION (SAMWU) First Applicant INDEPENDENT MUNICIPAL AND ALLIED WORKERS
Rights at Work Equality and Discrimination
Rights at Work Equality and Discrimination What is this leaflet for? This leaflet gives a brief outline of rights to equality and protection from discrimination. It includes basic information on: Who is
Labour Law Amendments RESOURCE GUIDE
Labour Law Amendments RESOURCE GUIDE March 2016 COPYRIGHT Unless otherwise indicated, copyright in this material vests in the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration. No part of this material
GENERAL NOTICE NEWSLETTER
HEAD OFFICE - JHB 2 ND Floor, Pin Oak House, Ballyoaks Office Park, 35 Ballyclare Drive, Bryanston, Johannesburg, 2191 T: 0861 737 263 F: 0861 737 239 PRETORIA BRANCH 11 Drummorgan, 580 Jan Bantjies Street
Technical factsheet Settlement offers
Technical factsheet Settlement offers This factsheet is part of a suite of employment factsheets and a pro forma contract that are updated regularly. These are: The contract of employment The probationary
STAATSKOERANT, 2 SEPTEMBER 2011 No GENERAL NOTICE NOTICE 602 OF 2011 CCMA GUIDELINES: MISCONDUCT ARBITRATIONS
STAATSKOERANT, 2 SEPTEMBER 2011 No.34573 3 GENERAL NOTICE NOTICE 602 OF 2011 GUIDELINES ON MISCONDUCT ARBITRATIONS PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION IN TERMS OF SECTION
ARBITRATION AWARD. Ananthan Sanjivi Dorasamy. In the ARBITRATION between: PSA O B O MAPHUMULO T M. (Union / Applicant) and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: KZN
ARBITRATION AWARD Panellist/s: Case No.: Date of Award: Ananthan Sanjivi Dorasamy PSHS195-11/12 16-Nov-2011 In the ARBITRATION between: PSA O B O MAPHUMULO T M and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: KZN (Union / Applicant)
Introduction Guidelines in cases of dismissal for misconduct: Item 7 of the Code
CCMA GUIDELINES: MISCONDUCT ARBITRATIONS PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION IN TERMS OF SECTION 115(2)(g) OF THE LABOUR RELATIONS ACT, 1995 (ACT NO. 66 OF 1995) TO
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY VS BROAD BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT: REFLECTING:WOULD SA INC BE A BETTER PLACE IF WE HAD PRIORITIZED DIFFERENTLY?
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY VS BROAD BASED BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT: REFLECTING:WOULD SA INC BE A BETTER PLACE IF WE HAD PRIORITIZED DIFFERENTLY? CONTENTS 1. DISCUSSING CONTENTS AND WHY I WROTE THE ARTICLE ON
Code of Practice Applies from 1 April Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. Introduction. Status of this code of practice
Trinity House, Bath Street, St. Helier, Jersey, JE2 4ST Telephone (01534) 730503 Fax (01534)733942 Email jacs@jacs.org.je Website www.jacs.org.je Code of Practice Applies from 1 April 2014 Disciplinary
ORDINANCE ON LABOUR CONTRACTS
STATE COUNCIL SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Independence - Freedom - Happiness Hanoi, 10 September 1990 ORDINANCE ON LABOUR CONTRACTS In order to protect the rights and interests of employees, to establish
THE EMPLOYMENT EQUITY BILL KEY CHANGES
Where results matter THE EMPLOYMENT EQUITY BILL KEY CHANGES The long awaited proposed amendments to the Employment Equity Act were finally published for public comment on 19 October 2012. It should be
GRIEVANCE POLICY. Approved by Version Issue Date Review Date Contact Person. SEG, Board 5.1 July 2016 July 2019 Director of HR
GRIEVANCE POLICY This policy is available on-line at: www.tynecoast.ac.uk We will consider any request for this policy to be made available in an alternative format or language. Please note that the College
CODE OF ETHICS & DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTITIONERS, GHANA
CODE OF ETHICS & DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTITIONERS, GHANA Objectives To ensure that human resource management practitioners promote and maintain the highest professional
SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ACT 97 OF 1998
SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ACT 97 OF 1998 (English text signed by the President) [Assented To: 20 October 1998] [Commencement Date: 2 February 1999 unless otherwise indicated] as amended by: Skills Development
CJA TELECOMMUNICATIONS (PTY) LTD EMPLOYMENT EQUITY SUCCESSION PLAN. For the period
CJA TELECOMMUNICATIONS (PTY) LTD EMPLOYMENT EQUITY SUCCESSION PLAN For the period 1 FEBRUARY 2015 31 JANUARY 2018 1 Introduction CJA Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd has actively pursued a transformation process
The new Labour Relations Act (LRA) 66 of 1995 was adopted by parliament on 13 September 1995.
LABOUR RELATIONS ACT INTRODUCTION The new Labour Relations Act (LRA) 66 of 1995 was adopted by parliament on 13 September 1995. The new LRA gives effect to the stated goals and principles of the reconstruction
Acas consultation. on the revision of paragraphs 15 and 36 of the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Acas consultation on the revision of paragraphs 15 and 36 of the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures December 2013 Acas consultation on the revision of paragraphs 15 and 36 of
RULING IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: AND. Employee/union representative : DAVID SAULS ATTORNEYS ELSIES RIVER 7490
RULING PANELIST : Adv Mosala Matlatle CASE NUMBER : WECT11000-12 DATE : 10 TH DECEMBER 2012 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: LORRAINE GROVE INDINGO BRANDS AND Employee party Employer party Employee/union representative
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA. N$2.00 WINDHOEK - 19 October 2009 No. 4361
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$2.00 WINDHOEK - 19 October 2009 No. 4361 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 208 Codes of good practice on industrial actions and picketing Labour Act, 2007...
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN. NEHAWU obo ABRAHAM SMITH
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN Not reportable Case no: C61/2017 In the matter between: NEHAWU obo ABRAHAM SMITH Applicant and PUBLIC HEALTH AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SECTORAL BARGAINING COUNCIL
FET FIRST Management Practice NQF Level 4 Students Book T. Krul
FET FIRST Management Practice NQF Level 4 Students Book T. Krul FET FIRST Management Practice NQF Level 4 Student s Book T. Krul, 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
Human Resources. Disciplinary procedures Teaching and support staff
Human Resources Disciplinary procedures Teaching and support staff Rev: September 2013 Contents Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Key policy principles 3 3. Support available during the disciplinary procedure
A Practical Guide to Labour Law
A Practical Guide to Labour Law Sixth Edition Authors JV du Plessis BA LLB LLD (Unisa) Advocate of the High Court Professor of Mercantile Law, University of the Free State MA Fouche Bluris LLB NHD PSE
EMPLOYMENT ACT 2002: STATUTORY DISPUTE RESOLUTION
EMPLOYMENT ACT 2002: STATUTORY DISPUTE RESOLUTION This article first appeared in Employment Law & Litigation volume 7 issue 4 2003 The Employment Act 2002 (EA 2002) introduces a new compulsory system for
PLACEMENT POLICY. Contents
Contents PLACEMENT POLICY 1. Definition.....2-4 2. Scope of Policy...4 3. Exclusions from this Policy...4 4. Period of Operation....4 5. Objective of Policy...4 6. Development of Staff Establishment (Organogram)...5
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG)
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) In the matter between: Case No.: J 2328/05 PUBLIC SERVANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA (PSA) Applicant and SAFETY & SECURITY SECTORIAL First Respondent
Employment Protection Act (1982:80)
Employment Protection Act (1982:80) Amendments: up to and including SFS 2016:1271 Introductory provisions Section 1 This Act applies to employees in the public or private sector. However, the following
Summary of the law on unfair dismissal and redundancy. Standing up for you
Summary of the law on unfair dismissal and redundancy www.thompsonstradeunion.law Our pledge to you Thompsons Solicitors has been standing up for the injured and mistreated since Harry Thompson founded
MEDIA BRIEFING ON THE STATUS OF LABOUR BROKERS AND THE NEDLAC NEGOTIATIONS ON LABOUR LAW AMENDMENTS LABOUR MINISTER, MILDRED OLIPHANT 19 JULY 2011
MEDIA BRIEFING ON THE STATUS OF LABOUR BROKERS AND THE NEDLAC NEGOTIATIONS ON LABOUR LAW AMENDMENTS LABOUR MINISTER, MILDRED OLIPHANT Industrial Action 19 JULY 2011 With regards to the wave of industrial
FIXED TERM EMPLOYEES THE LITTLE USED REGULATIONS?
FIXED TERM EMPLOYEES THE LITTLE USED REGULATIONS? An abridged version of this article appeared in Employment Law Journal December 2004 It has been just over 2 years since the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention
University of Cape Town
Jan Harm Venter VNTJAN006 MPhil (Labour Law) 5614W THE LAW OF RETRENCHMENT: S 189A FACILITATION The impact of facilitation in large scale retrenchments. Supervisor: A/Professor Debbie Collier Word Count:
Grievance Policy and Procedure
Grievance Policy and Procedure Document Control Information Reviewed by the Strategic Management Team: - Date of Next Review: Mar 2016 Approved by the Board of Management: 24 Mar 2014 The Board of Management
UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL, PIETERMARITZBURG EXAMINATIONS: NOVEMBER 2011 (LAWS2CS) DURATION: 3 HOURS TOTAL MARKS: 70
DURATION: 3 HOURS TOTAL MARKS: 70 External Examiner: Internal Examiners: Professor M Beukes Ms A Strode Professor W Freedman STUDENTS ARE REQUESTED, IN THEIR OWN INTERESTS, TO WRITE LEGIBLY. PLEASE NOTE:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT. PRETORIA) JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA /ES (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT. PRETORIA) DELETE WHICHEVER»b r (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO. (2) O'- INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: «CASE NO: 42023/09 DATE: gj/o/^o'o (3) REVISED.
4. Applicants must satisfy the following requirements in order to demonstrate their substantial involvement in labour and employment law: (a)
LAW SOCIETY OF ONTARIO CERTIFIED SPECIALIST PROGRAM 130 QUEEN STREET WEST, TONTO, ON M5H 2N6 TELEPHONE 416-947-3463 CERTSPEC@LSO.CA CERTIFIED SPECIALIST PROGRAM Standards for Certification Labour and Employment
DISCIPLINARY POLICY UNIQUE REFERENCE NUMBER: RC/XX/030/V2 DOCUMENT STATUS: DATE ISSUED: 2016 DATE TO BE REVIEWED:
DISCIPLINARY POLICY UNIQUE REFERENCE NUMBER: RC/XX/030/V2 DOCUMENT STATUS: Approved by Committee 3 August 2016 DATE ISSUED: August 2016 DATE TO BE REVIEWED: August 2019 AMENDMENT HISTORY VERSION DATE AMENDMENT
EXPLANATION: SECTION 198 AMENDMENTS
EXPLANATION: SECTION 198 AMENDMENTS Clause 37 Clause 37 of the Bill seeks to amend section 198 of the Act in order to effectively address certain problems and abusive practices associated with temporary
sip Case No 451/94 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between MUTUAL AND FEDERAL INSURANCE and
sip Case No 451/94 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between MUTUAL AND FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED APPELLANT and BANKING, INSURANCE, FINANCE AND ASSURANCE WORKERS
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not reportable Case no: JS 237/15 NATIONAL UNION OF METALWORKERS OF SOUTH AFRICA First Applicant MAMABOLO AND TWO OTHERS Second Applicant and TRANSALLOYS
Employee termination decisions are not subject to the informal resolution process.
BARABOO SCHOOL BOARD POLICY 527-Rule Informal Resolution: EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE This Employee Grievance Procedure is intended to apply to all school district employees, except where a valid, enforceable
Remedy Guide to the JIB Disputes Procedure. August 2017 JIB 691
Remedy Guide to the JIB Disputes Procedure August 2017 JIB 691 1 INDEX Page 1. BACKGROUND 2 2. REMEDIES 2-7 (a) Pay in lieu of notice 3 (b) Basic award 3 (c) Compensatory award 3 i. Loss of earnings 3
Self help guide Preparing a grievance procedure
Self help guide Preparing a grievance procedure The sample wording in this document is for guidance only. The wording must reflect your current contractual arrangements. Any errors or omissions cannot
GUYANA TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND SEVERANCE PAY ACT ACT No. 19 of 1997 ARRANGEMENTS OF SECTIONS PART II CONTINUITY OF EMPLOYMENT
GUYANA TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND SEVERANCE PAY ACT 1997 ACT No. 19 of 1997 ARRANGEMENTS OF SECTIONS SECTION PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Higher standards permitted. PART
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: D1025-17 In the matter between: UNITRANS PASSENGER (PTY) LTD t/a GREYHOUND COUCHLINES Applicant and NUMSA and Members SARPBAC
CASE NO: J 472/06. (SATAWU) Applicant JUDGMENT
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN JOHANNESBURG REVISED JUDGMENT (30/06/ 2006) CASE NO: J 472/06 In the matter between: S A Transport and Allied Workers Union (SATAWU) Applicant and Natro Fright
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE. Introduction
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE Introduction 1.1 This procedure applies to all employees of the University. It aims to comply with the Arbitration, Conciliation and Advisory Service (ACAS) Code of Practice, introduced
Collective Labour Dispute Resolution Act
Issuer: Riigikogu Type: act In force from: 01.01.2015 In force until: 04.07.2015 Translation published: 11.11.2014 Amended by the following acts Passed 05.05.1993 RT I 1993, 26, 442 Entry into force 07.06.1993