The SESAR Joint Undertaking is a EU body created by the EU Council (REG 219/2007)

Transcription

1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION

2 The SESAR family The SESAR Joint Undertaking is a EU body created by the EU Council (REG 219/2007) Its founding members are the European Community and the Eurocontrol Organisation Members Associate partners Page 2

3 SESAR Partnership More than 300 projects 16 work packages 110 Companies 23 Countries Work Package and Projects are led by SESAR Members Shared investments, with regime of IPR usage and protection Validation close to market Today: 2500 persons working on the programme First package of deliveries: 2011 (SESAR R1) Second package (SESAR R2) being delivered Page 3

4 SESAR & THE SES PERFORMANCE APPROACH

5 Political level SES High-Level Goals Planning level SES Strategic Performance Objectives (Long Term View) Performance Scheme (Short & Medium Term View) SESAR Performance Contribution Operational and Technical system evolution Performance Needs SES Pillars Performance Contribution Structural reform - FAB, NMF, Best practices Validation Targets Needs & Priorities PERFORMANCE DRIVEN R&D MATURE SOLUTIONS Business Cases Performance Expectations EUROPEAN EUROPEAN ATM ATM MASTER MASTER PLAN PLAN Performance Scheme Targets (RPx) NETWORK NETWORK STRATEGY STRATEGY PLAN PLAN FAB/National FAB/National Perf. Perf. Plans Plans

6 A PROGRAMME DERIVED FROM THE MASTER PLAN The Master Plan update includes: Definition of the SESAR Contribution for each of the SES Strategic Performance Objectives Priorities and realistic milestones Deployment views by stakeholders & High level CBA Enable sustained growth by relieving capacity bottlenecks Reduce delays and cancellations Fuel efficient flight profiles Reduce ANS charges per flight Increase safety Cost Efficiency Targets SES SESAR Objectives 14% 6% 10% 23% 50% Baseline 2005 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3

7 DEPLOYMENT ORIENTED & PERFORMANCE DRIVEN RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT

8 SESAR DEVELOPMENT R&D PROJECTS PROGRAMME MASTER PLAN PERFORMANCE NEEDS OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS & ENABLERS HIGH LEVEL DEPLOYMENT & DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE PERFORMANCE VALIDATION TARGETS CONCEPT & ARCHITECTURE OPERATIONAL & TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CASES STANDARDISATION & REGULATION PREP. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM PROTOTYPES VALIDATION ACTIVITIES & RESULTS 4D Trajectory Traffic Synchronisation Airport Integration Network Management Conflict Management & Automation

9 SESAR MANAGEMENT R&D PROJECTS PROGRAMME MASTER PLAN R 2 01/ / SE# SE#1 Today R1 Validation Phase SE#3 SE#2 R2 Definition R2 Preparation R2 Validation R 3 R3 Definition SE#1 R3 P Assessment decisions: trend per month (after closure) Aug 2011 Sep 2011 Oct 2011 Nov 2011 Dec 2011 Jan 2012 FTE %Planned (end 2011) %Complete (end 2011) Weather Resiliance Remote Tower Traffic Synchronisation SWIM Integrated Surface Management Improved Vertical Profiles icwp En Route and TMA icwp Airport Enhanced Runway Throughput Enhanced Route Structures Demand and Capacity Balancing En Demand and Capacity Balancing Conflict Management and Support Complexity Management CNS Airport Safety Airborne Spacing and Separation Air Safety Nets 4D Trajectory Management 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Full resource profile in FTE 140% 1,5 99% 90% 92% 89% 82% 1,0 69% 0,5 0, Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q1 Planned effort Actual effort Actual subcontracted effort Ratio Actual vs Planned effort Ratio Actual vs Planned Effort

10 SESAR DELIVERY R&D PROJECTS PROGRAMME MASTER PLAN Time Based Operations Trajectory Based Operations

11 FIRST RESULTS

12

13 RELIEVING CAPACITY BOTTLENECKS KEY SESAR SOLUTIONS IN RELEASE 1 Integrated Arrival and Departure Manager Extended AMAN Horizon Point Merge in Complex TMA INTEGRATED ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE MANAGER Validation through live trial of enhanced Departure Manager in terms of procedures for establishing pre-departure sequence at Paris CDG Performance improvement in terms of target start-up time, predictability and stability of departure sequence Average taxi time decreased by 9% Improved adherence to CFMU slots Reliability of the DMAN in bad weather conditions Enhanced tactical scheduling of changes to runway capacity and configuration Time period (LT) Improvement 6H-7H -15% 9H-10H -9% 12H-13H -8% 18H-19H -37% Delay at the runway threshold during peak hours

14 REDUCE DELAYS AND CANCELLATIONS KEY SESAR SOLUTIONS IN RELEASE 1 Complexity Assessment & Resolution Point Merge Extended AMAN horizon Enhanced ATFCM i4d + Controlled Time of Arrival SHORT TERM ATFM MEASURES Assessment of Short Term ATFM Measures, of new roles and responsibilities for Flow Management of the improved information quality for local decision making Live trial involving the CFMU, FMPs (DSNA, NATS, MUAC) and AOs Local decisions (FMP, AO) are efficient Increased ability to exploit capacity network opportunities Improved prediction of demand The STAM Process improves my daily work Strongly Agree; 13% Agree; 50% Strongly disagree; 0% Disagree; 13% Undecided; 25% Some significant promising increased in throughput e.g. for KH Reims sector, the average delay recorded changed from 0.18 minutes to 0.08 minutes for comparable traffic

15 RELIEVING CAPACITY BOTTLENECKS KEY SESAR SOLUTIONS IN RELEASE 1 Extended AMAN Horizon EXTENDED AMAN HORIZON Validation at NATS London TC and NORACON Malmö of Extended Arrival Management to achieve sequencing traffic and reduced holding Feasibility of sequencing traffic in the en-route phase demonstrated Two types of sequence coordination: ATC to ATC and ATC to AOC In the London exercise, aircraft fuel burnt in the 500 nautical miles extended AMAN Horizon was reduced by 9% or 942 kg on average per flight Aircraft stack holding time in London was reduced by between 78% and 87%

16 REDUCE ANS CHARGES PER FLIGHT KEY SESAR SOLUTIONS IN RELEASE 1 Remote Tower Integrated Controller Working position REMOTE TOWER Assessment of the technical and operational capability for the provision of ATC service to a single aerodrome from a remote control site located approximately 100Km away Shadow mode operations at Malmö Sturup Airport, based on validation info from Ängelholm Airport Sector Team Operations Under normal conditions, the controllers confirmed that a safe service could be provided remotely Controller opinion was that the picture during day time was generally clearer and easier to interpret than night The IR camera might allow increased opportunities and flexibility in working methods OPERATIONAL ACCEPTABILITY Angelholm ATS Non Angelholm ATS Dutch NSA involved in validation activities ATS OPERATIONSCOMPLEXITY

17 RELIEVING CAPACITY BOTTLENECKS KEY SESAR SOLUTIONS IN RELEASE 1 4iD+CTA i4d + CTA validation of operational concept of flying to a time (CTA) in the En-Route as well as in the TMA airspace. Datalink transmission of the Extended Projected Profile and the RTA management and acceptance Successful flight trial from Toulouse to Copenhagen and Stockholm including the first i4d validation trial in the world Technically and operationally, the flight trial was successful (trajectory exchange and RTA respect); Aircraft met the time constraints with 3 seconds accuracy;

18 NEXT STEPS

19

20 Key highlights Release 2 Surface planning & routing Refinement of Time Based Separation minima Improved ATC Trajectory prediction thanks to AOC data Enriched ICAO flight plan information with flight performance data provided by AOC i4d + CTA Enhanced interoperability between ASM, ATFCM tools and ATC controller working position

21 Going beyond the Releases: SESAR Demos AIRE (Environment) SESAR Solutions Demonstrations Gander Oceanic Control Shanwick Oceanic Control New York Oceanic Santa Maria Oceanic Canarias