SWIFTLY Green and GET Greener Two projects for sustainable transport corridors

Transcription

1 SWIFTLY Green and GET Greener Two projects for sustainable transport corridors Lina Wells October

2 Brief data on the Swedish Transport Administration The Board Director-General Lena Erixon North employees Central Business volume in 2014 SEK West East Stockholm Of which Investments O&M and traffic control Miscellaneous SEK 21.5 billion SEK 19.5 billion SEK 9.0 billion South

3 Swedish Transport Administration (STA) STA manages km roads km railways STA responsible for the planning of all four transport modes STA is an independent authority (not within the ministry)

4 SWIFTLY Green Sweden-Italy Freight Transport and Logistics (SWIFTLY) Green Corridor Aim: facilitate reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases without increasing transportation costs Target groups: corridor coordinators, infrastructure managers, transport companies and other stakeholders Project period: Oct 2013 Dec 2015 Project budget: 2.8 M Coordinator: Closer (Sweden)

5 The role of SWIFTLY Green Mission: support the development of green logistics and transport in Europe Result: a toolbox for increased consideration of green issues in the TEN-T planning and implementation of the TEN-T core network corridors Also: established the dialogue with all nine core network corridor teams

6 Partners

7 Activities 1. Project Management and Communication 2. Mapping of current status of the Corridor and results of project for greening the transport corridor 3. Analysis of the effectiveness and transferability of transport measures across countries along the corridor 4. Best-practice analysis and selection of innovative scenarios for greening of transport corridor 5. Development and test of tools for greening of transport in TEN-T corridors 6. Development of Toolbox and Guidelines for greening of transport in TEN-T corridors

8 From projects to measures Several projects funded by EU Various project results/measures Vehicle development Transshipment technologies Which measure has a greening potential? Which of them are effective? How to compare them? Applicability of measures on corridor level? Lots of uncertainties

9 SWIFTLY Green deliveries The Green Corridor Portal (tool box) Green Corridor Development Plan

10 Green Corridor Portal Supports common learning through dissemination of findings in existing and coming projects Provides insight and contacts to successful solutions for further implementation Initiates new improvement measures Provides access to relevant tools and data for measurement of progress Evaluate relevant information through well specified criteria

11 Examples of measures

12 GET Greener Use some of the measures from SWIFTLY Green and GreCOR on real cases Focus: measures possible to implement in near future with reasonable efforts Quantify actual impact (absolute and relative) Discuss implications on general policy making by the Swedish Transport Administration how to integrate in planning

13 GET Greener Goal Identify packages of measures that contributes to significant reductions in environmental impact and can be implemented in a near future

14 Approach Use a case approach to ensure industrial relevance General learnings may be less profound Three basic cases: Rail Road Sea For each case an analysis is done concerning: The current situation or a general baseline indicating general business practice Possible combinations of measures to implement Effects of these measures

15 Use case: Rail Current: Flows from Scandinavia to Europe to Scandinavia with available capacity northbound Measures (examples): Longer & Heavier, Last-Mile Access and Corridor Section Management Effects: Energy, GHG and air pollutants and effects to be analysed Social (external) costs to be estimated (ambition) Technological Readiness Level (TRL) to be analysed Market Readiness Level (MRL) to be analysed

16 Use case: Long haul road transport Current: Flows from Gothenburg/Stockholm/Umeå (potentially intermodal) Malmö and possibly further to Germany Measures (examples): Size, utilization, fuel consumption, fuel quality and low-emission trucks Effects: Energy, GHG and air pollutants effects to be analysed Social (external) costs to be estimated (ambition) Technological Readiness Level (TRL) to be analysed Market Readiness Level (MRL) to be analysed

17 Use case: Sea container feed Current: Container feeder Hamburg Stockholm Measures (examples): Legal requirements (SECA & NECA), LNGpropulsion and utilization, etc. Effects: Energy, GHG and air pollutants and effects to be analysed Social (external) costs to be estimated (ambition) Technological Readiness Level (TRL) to be analysed Market Readiness Level (MRL) to be analysed

18 GET Greener Choose method Choose use cases September - October Case descriptions November - December Analysis January 2017 Calculate effects Report February March

19