ERTMS: EXPERIENCE WITH DIGITAL SYSTEMINTEGRATION A FRONTRUNNER S EXPERIENCE

Transcription

1 ERTMS: EXPERIENCE WITH DIGITAL SYSTEMINTEGRATION A FRONTRUNNER S EXPERIENCE

2 RAMBOLL IN BRIEF Independent engineering and design consultancy and provider of management consultancy Founded 1945 in Denmark 13,000 experts Close to 300 offices in 35 countries Particularly strong presence in the Nordics, the UK, North America, Continental Europe, Middle East and Asia Pacific EUR 1.4 billion revenue Owned by Rambøll Fonden Services across the markets: - Buildings - Transport - Planning & Urban Design - Water - Environment & Health - Energy - Oil & Gas - Management Consulting

3 DIGITAL AND AUTOMATED SYSTEMS IN THE FUTURE RAMBOLL SIGNALLING & ERTMS CONSULTANCY BUSINESS Ramboll is one of the leading ERTMS systems engineering & integration consultants in the world Leading consultant within automated metro, people movers and s-bane systems Centres of excellence in Denmark, Norway & UK Client side systems integration delivery partner of ERTMS projects covering the entire programme lifecycle from craddle to grave Since 10 years - leading the client side JV consultancy team for the Danish ERTMS Signalling Programme Main consultant to Norway ERTMS Programme & Follo line signalling Leading systems integration in UK ERTMS Programme Client side and technical support to Queensland Rail and WSP in Brisbane

4 RAILWAY AS FORERUNNER Complex legislation First mechanical transport (steam) 1830 Safety regulations 1840 Automated Train Operation London Underground, Victoria, 1967 Driverless trains Kobe, Japan 1981 & Lille, France 1983 Copenhagen 2002 Open market railway in Europe 1995 EUROPEAN RAIL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM An open system Open Specifications Many Suppliers Very long experience on complex system ERTMS

5 ERTMS LOOK SIMPLE BUT COMPLEX INTERFACES Modes, Movement authority Operational Rule Route setting Operation Degraded modes Train characterics Brake interverntion SMS like short messages Key Management Engineering Rules Track conditions: Radio holes Low adhesion Odometry SMS like short messages (Big RFID) Infrastructure data: Gradient, speed profile, mode profile etc. Wheel Compatibility 5

6 THE RAILWAY DIGITALISATION Advanced decision support TSI TAP TSI-TAF Power consumption Pantograph monitoring Exchange of freight (cargo) & Passenger information Environment Gauge (profile) Vehicle data Vehicle registers Component monitoring Weight Wheel Monitoring Derailment, Roundness, Bearing, Hot wheel Track monitoring Infrastructure data Gradient, profile, speed, modes etc Infrastructure registers

7 LEGAL REQUIREMENT FOR INTEROPERABILITY (AND THE OPEN MARKET) Safety regulations Safety directive Process (CSM-RA) + Independent Safety assessor Interoperability Interoperability directive Technical Specification for interoperability, both technical and compliance (test) req. The hard legal (technical) requirements Notified Body to verify compliance (Decision 768/2008/EC common framework for the marketing of products) European Standards & ERTMS subsets Many specifications with some mandatory, many choices and possible cherry picking do not ease clear specifications in a specific case

8 INTEGRATION PRINCIPLES Authorisation separation Test 1) TTSV Train/Track 2) Operational Scenarios 3) (operational rehersal) Train Onboard EVC ODO STM GSM-R Trackside ERTMS RBC GSM-R Balise Brakes Axle C. IC verification System(Train) verification System(Trackside) verification IC verification Note: very simplified

9 SYSTEM INTEGRATION IN ERTMS Operational Concept Concept (CD) Prelim. Design PD Install Design Preparatory Works(Marker Boards, Balise, AC, ) System Design/Implementation System Other Suppl PICO SIT SAT Customer Integration Trial run 1 Operational test Trial run 2 Schedule & performance APIS Integration On-Board Supplier TTSV Banedanmark GSM-R Verification Installation System test System Integration Operational test Operational Scenarios Operational Rules Inteface/customer integration Test in field with trains Joint Test Lab 9

10 INTEGRATION LEARNING ERTMS Interoperability constituents certification System integration Complex and influenced by reality INDUSTRIAL Product certification / defined spec. & test verification System integration Standardise connection interface functional i/f Functional test: Test Require a lot effort Component System User/organisation Standardise

11 LEARNINGS Do not think IOT will provide interoperability Connection interface is the simple part Information interface the difficult part Intelligent cars/driverless is not that simple More complex than railways Existing infrastructure must be understood: Factory provide constraints Existing factory data is not always correct Data is Dirty, Delayed and Disrupted System must be robust and redundant

12 THANK YOU QUESTIONS? STIG MUNCK