TimeTableRedesign Pilot Brenner

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TimeTableRedesign Pilot Brenner"

Transcription

1 Pilot Information Document TimeTableRedesign Pilot Brenner (on RFC-Routing ScanMed) Report for Phase 1 Preparations for Phase 2 DRAFT - Version V001 Frankfurt, Vienna, Roma P a g e

2 Table of contents 1 Introduction Disclaimer The components of the pilot Geographical routing of the pilot Capacity model TT2020 process timeline Annual planning (X-8) Rolling planning (R.P.) TTR goal of Rolling Planning Timeline of Rolling planning request and leading tool Rolling Planning offer on the TTR-Pilot Brenner Annual timetable requests Impact TTR pilot on Annual timetable requests Priority rules Rolling planning requests Timeline Priority rule Publication of Rolling Planning capacity and conditions of the paths Timeframes of the safeguarded rolling planning volumes Leading tool for the handling of capacity requests Handling of capacity rights for multi-annual requests Modifications and cancellations Modifications and Cancellations in the TTR- Pilot Brenner RP booking procedure Coordination and publication of planned temporary capacity restrictions Goals Legal background TCRs on the TTR-Pilot Brenner for TT KPIs to evaluate the TTR-Pilot Open Points for discussion: P a g e

3 1 Introduction As agreed by the RNE General Assembly (May 2017) and FTE Plenary Assembly (June 2017), TTR will be implemented gradually with tests being conducted in pilots to test some of the important and innovative TTR components. RNE and FTE defined three single line pilots and one network pilot: The four TTR-Pilots: These pilots will be operative for timetable 2020 and the following year The goals of the pilots are: - Proof of the business reference model s accuracy - Definition and specification of data reference model for capacity - Gathering input for process steering methods (e.g. allocation rules, commercial conditions) - Gathering input for performance reference model o Comparing capacity model with actual requests o Amount of modifications/alterations o Percentage of safeguarded capacity vs. residual capacity usage. The goal of pilot phase 2 is to test capacity requests for timetable 2020 and 2021 based on the capacity models created in pilot phase 1. The methods of the pilot lines are similar to each other to allow a comparison of the results. The goals are: The proof of the business concept, specifically the correlation of annual timetabling capacity (ATT), capacity for TCRs (in line with the recast Annex VII) and safeguarded capacity for Rolling Planning; Inputs for improving the process; Inputs for the IT landscape (definition of requirements for IT systems); More information is available online on 3 P a g e

4 Contact Persons for TTR-Pilot Brenner: - Pilot project managers: Pilot Munich Verona IM DB Netz ÖBB Infra RFI Contact Andri Kopperschmidt (Project Manager) Pascal Kraus Berta Schiller Franz Wieser Helmut Fruhmann Marco Gatta Pietro Matera andri.kopperschmidt@ deutschebahn.com pascal.kraus@ deutschebahn.com Franz.Wieser@oebb.at Helmut.Fruhmann@oebb.at m.gatta@rfi.it p.matera@rfi.it berta.schiller@ deutschebahn.com Phone (0) Overall contact persons on RNE/FTE level: TTR-Pilot Munich Verona Contact RailNetEurope (RNE) Philipp Koiser, Sales & Timetabling Manager / Leader TTR Programme philipp.koiser@rne.eu Forum Train Europe (FTE) Peter Jäggy Secretary General peter.jaeggy@forumtraineurope.eu Phone +43 (0) Disclaimer This Pilot Information Document focusses on the description of the new TTR concepts that are tested in this pilot. Many processes stay unchanged. For these processes we refer to the Network Statements of ÖBB Infra, RFI and DB Netz AG. The TTR pilot is accessible for all applicants that fulfil the national requirements of each involved infrastructure territory. 4 P a g e

5 This document is revised at least every year, based on the experiences in the pilot. Changes in the legal basis of this document (e.g. changes in EU regulations, Framework for Capacity Allocation or national network statement) will be implemented with each revision. Any changes during the running allocation process will be communicated directly to the applicants through publication by the involved IM. 3 The components of the pilot 3.1 Geographical routing of the pilot Munich Rosenheim Rosenheim Kufstein Kufstein Wörgl Wörgl Innsbruck Innsbruck Brenner Brennero Bolzano Bolzano Domegliara Domegliara Verona 5 P a g e

6 3.2 Capacity model In pilot phase 1 the capacity model has been developed for the pilot line. The capacity model visualizes the share of capacity dedicated to commercial capacity (partitioned between Annual Planning and Rolling Planning ) and capacity dedicated to temporary capacity restrictions (TCRs) and Maintenance Windows. The capacity model is published in January AdHoc-Requests will not be served by any reserved capacity, so for the capacity model it is out of scope. RNE Capacity Model Developing the Capacity Model for the TTR- Pilot Brenner The capacity model is necessary for the TTR-Project to evaluate the amount of capacity safeguarded for the "rolling planning" offer. The first capacity model will be provided for the timetable-year 2020 on the routing Munich- Verona. Input for the capacity model came from all stakeholders: Railway Undertakings (Passenger and Freight Traffic), Regional Government, Rail Authorities, Works and Possessions. 6 P a g e

7 The Railway Untertakings where asked to present their extimations via the following questionaire: Collection of input factors from all relevant sources to develop the capacity model: 7 P a g e

8 Results for the capacity model for the different capacity shares: Stable Traffic Capacity Share for the TTR- Pilot Brenner Dynamic Traffic Capacity Share for the TTR- Pilot Brenner: For the TTR-Pilot Brenner provides preconstructed paths for freight traffic. Out of these complete offer of paths for the fright traffic, the paths reserved for the Rolling Planning offer will be selected. The actual and complete capacity model is available from the 15. Of January 2019 for each customer on the RNE-Website: REMARK: Due to technical limitations of the interface of the provided ElectronicCapacityModel- Tool (ECM-Tool), the TTR-Pilot Brenner will only display all paths on the routing, that will be used to serve the Rolling Planning Requests: 8 P a g e

9 Available paths for Rolling Planning on the Brenner Routing: 3.3 TT2020 process timeline Date / Deadline Date in X- System Description of Activities Responsibility 14 January 2019 X-11 8 April 2019 X-8 Publication of Rolling Planning Capacity Last day to request annual planning, placed on time IM RU 1 July 2019 X-5 Publication of draft timetable IM 2 July August 2019 X-5 X-4 Observations and comments from applicants RU 19 August 2019 X-3.5 Publication of final offer IM 25 August 2019 X-3 Acceptance of final offer RU 15 December 2019 X Timetable change IM 19 August December 2020 X-2 - X+12 Application and allocation phase for RPR IM / RU 9 P a g e

10 3.5 Annual planning (X-8) The time grid is actually (during the pilot) identical to the current TT process. Path request Path construction Observations Post processing (in Germany: Approval of regulatory body) Acceptancy 3.6 Rolling planning (R.P.) TTR goal of Rolling Planning The goal of RP is to offer RU s the possibility to request at a later moment capacity for their dynamic traffic with a guarantee of a good quality to make a better fit to the market demands. Another goal of RP is to request capacity for a period that is not limited by timetable schedules. This mean that requests can be either for: - A period longer than one timetable year to make a better match with stable multi-annual contracts between customers and RUs. In TTR this is called multi-annual rolling planning requests. The answer provided by IM(s) is either a train path or a train path + a slot according to the moment the request is placed and the period wished. - A period that is shared among two timetable years. - Consequently, RP requests may cover periods from 1 day to 36 months. The TTR-Pilot Brenner scope for Rolling Planning multi-annual requests is limited to a maximum of 24 month and will end in December Rolling Planning: Request and operating time: Pilot phase 2 focusses on testing the RP in practice for freight trains on the line Munich Kufstein - Wörgl Brenner Bolzano - Domegliara Verona. The capacity assigned to Rolling Planning in the capacity model can be requested starting on 19th of August 2019 for requests in TT2020 and TT2021 periods. 10 P a g e

11 3.6.2 Timeline of Rolling planning request and leading tool For the request of capacity in the pilot, national booking tools will be used. REMARK: The TTR-Pilot Brenner will not publish and offer Rolling Planning request via PCS. RU s can request Rolling Planning Capacity not earlier than 4 months / 16 weeks before first day of operations and not later than 1 month / 4 weeks before day of operations Rolling Planning offer on the TTR-Pilot Brenner 11 P a g e

12 4 Annual timetable requests 4.1 Impact TTR pilot on Annual timetable requests The annual timetable process on the pilot lines is unchanged. The only impact the pilot has on the annual time table process is related to the safeguarded capacity: one part of the annual timetable capacity is reserved for rolling planning requests (i.e. at earliest from X-4). 4.2 Priority rules The actual existing priority rules are implemented, as described in the network statements of RFI, ÖBB Infra, DB Netz AG. As part of the TTR pilot, ÖBB Infra, RFI and DB Netz Ag are going to publish safeguarded capacity. This capacity needs to remain unspoilt during the annual time table process on the pilot line. In case annual requests overlap with safeguarded capacity for rolling planning requests the IM s apply the following rules: If an annual timetable request conflicts with safeguarded capacity the IM will construct a path that will provide at least sufficient capacity for Rolling Planning. If a request for maintenance window, that was not foreseen in the capacity model, conflicts with safeguarded capacity, the IM will respect the safeguarded capacity and will find another solution for the maintenance request. Force majeure situations are exceptions to this rule. In the latter case, the IM will provide the concerned RU with an alternative path. 5 Rolling planning requests 5.1 Timeline Rolling planning requests can be triggered from 19 August 2019 on. The request needs to be done with requested running days of timetable year In case the RU wishes to extend this request for a longer period, this can be done for TT Priority rule The IM applies the first come first served rule. The paths will be constructed within the RP safeguarded capacity volume for time table Publication of Rolling Planning capacity and conditions of the paths Rolling Planning capacity and the conditions of the paths are published by RFI, DB Netz and ÖBB Infra via RNE CMS platform. Remaining Rolling Planning capacity will be updated regularly. We foresee the following publication moments: - Initial publication of RP capacity in January 2019 for TT Regular updates during the RP phase. 5.4 Timeframes of the safeguarded rolling planning volumes RP capacity is safeguarded until 30 days before day of operation. After 30 days the safeguarded capacity is in principle used by the IM for AdHoc traffic. 12 P a g e

13 5.5 Leading tool for the handling of capacity requests Applicants sending requests to the IM shall use national request tools. The following matrix shows for each step in the process which tool is considered as the leading tool. National booking tools: RFI: R to be completed by RFI ÖBB: R to be completed by ÖBB DB Netz AG. TrassenPortalNetz (TPN): Handling of capacity rights for multi-annual requests In the RP2020 request the RU can declare that he wishes to have this capacity for a longer period than Time Table He can state the calendar days in which he wants to run this train in 2021 as well. The concerned IM(s) will give this RU a detailed path for The RU receives a capacity right for The concerned IM(s) guarantee that the RU can run the train in 2021 within a margin of plus or minus 30 minutes from the allocated timetable in Capacity rights for future timetable are input for the capacity model and its partitioning (the Rolling Planning volume). 5 months before timetable change the IM s will ask the RU if there is a need to modify the path for the upcoming TT period and to define the calendar days. The IM will then create a detailed path for the next TT year without the RU having to place a new request. Multi-Annual Rolling planning request on the TTR- Pilot Brenner 13 P a g e

14 6 Modifications and cancellations 6.1 Modifications and Cancellations in the TTR- Pilot Brenner RP booking procedure 7 Coordination and publication of planned temporary capacity restrictions 7.1 Goals Planned Temporary Capacity Restrictions (TCRs) are necessary to keep the infrastructure and its equipment in operational condition and to allow changes to the infrastructure necessary to cover market needs. However, there is a strong customer demand to know in advance which capacity restrictions they will be confronted with. 7.2 Legal background The legal background to this chapter can be found in the revised Annex VII (2017/2075) of the European Directive 2012/34EU published A framework has been published by RNE in the " Guidelines for Coordination / Publication of Planned Temporary Capacity Restrictions. 14 P a g e

15 7.3 TCRs on the TTR-Pilot Brenner for TT 2020 On the Brenner routing there is an already established process to communicate and coordinate TCRs between IMs and RUs. This process is almost in line with the Annex 7. TTR-Pilot Brenner took over the already adjusted and communicated TCRs for the capacity model: 8 KPIs to evaluate the TTR-Pilot To evaluate the success of the TTR-Pilots, KPIs must be defined to compare the three pilots and measure the acceptance of the market to the new products and methods: 1. Amount of requested rolling planning paths by RUs 2. Amount of offered rolling planning capacity by IMs 3. Share of cancellations and alterations by RUs of rolling planning paths 4. Share of cancellations and modifications by IMs of rolling planning paths 5. Share of final constructed rolling planning paths within the guaranteed bandwidth 6. Relation between offered, requested and allocated rolling planning paths To be completed with further progress of the pilots. 15 P a g e

16 9 Open Points for discussion: 1. Stable TCRs are crucial for the success of TTR, national procedures must ensure the stability of TCRs! 2. Insert Adhoc Capacity in the capacity model 3. Legal aspect concerning multi-annual Rolling Planning offer at the moment not in line with EU-Law 4. Adjustment of actual commercial conditions and harmonization eurowide 5. IT-Issues: The TTR IT-Landscape fits to the TTR-Concept, but does it fit to the national IT-Architecture? To be completed with further progress of the pilots. 16 P a g e