ISO Implementation Ed. Collins Energy and Utilities Champion

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ISO Implementation Ed. Collins Energy and Utilities Champion"

Transcription

1 ISO 1 Implementation Ed. Collins Energy and Utilities Champion 21st Feb 214

2 Presentation Overview 1. ISO 1 as part of an Energy Reduction Strategy 2. ISO 1 as an on-going process 3. Benefits of ISO 1 certification 4. Challenges of implementing ISO 1 5. Performance Management and successful implementation of ISO 1 6. Key factors for ensuring that certification is obtained 7. Key factors for ensuring that certification is maintained 8. Knowledge gained from implementing Energy Efficient Design 9. Energy and Utilities Dashboard for New Facility

3 ISO 1 as part of an Energy Reduction Strategy 33, 28, 23, 29 Tonnes CO2 18, 13, Top Down (Projects) Approach 21 Bottom Up (Tiered Metrics) approach Introduced 211 Bottom Up embedded & Intelligent (DCS) approach introduced EN-161 EMS Certification 212 Intelligent (DCS) embedded ISO-1 EMS Certification 213

4 ISO 1 is an on-going process and not just a certificate Opportunities Register Energy Project Assessment CO2 / Energy Waterfall - Projects for the coming year - Timing of project savings incorporated GJs Production Plan Energy Prediction Models - Electricity Model - Gas and Steam Model Predictions & Targeting ELECTRICITY(DASHBOARD Non@Production)Buildings)kWh/Day Production)Buildings)kWh/Day PSA)Nitrogen)kWh/Day Incineration)kWh/Day Compressed)Air/Thermal)Fluid) kwh/day CTW)Systems)kWh/Day Fridge)Systems)kWh/Day !"!" Electricity Dashboard Lag Metric Usage detail for SEUs A16)Solvent)Recovery/A24)IPA)Scrubbers/A13) Tank)Farm/Mains)Water)Pumps)kWh/Day WWTP)kWh/Day GAS(DASHBOARD Gas)Dashboard)m 3 /)day 2, 18, 16, 14,!" 12, Energy Monitoring System m 3 1, IN(No.3 IN(No.1 BO22 8, BO23 m3(target 6, 4,!" Gas Dashboard Lag Metric for major gas users Monitoring of actual v target use 2, CO2 % Reduction 7.% 6.% 5.% 4.% 3.% 2.% 1.%.% -1.% -2.% -3.% -4.% -5.% -6.% -7.% -8.% -9.% -1.% -11.% -12.% -13.% -14.% -15.% -16.% -17.% -18.% -19.% -2.% -21.% -22.% -23.% -24.% -25.% -26.% -27.% -28.% -29.% -3.% -31.% -32.% -33.% -34.% -35.% -36.% -37.% Programme Update (Quarterly) Predicted Reduction Actual Reduction BUVD Limit CO2 % Reduction Chart!" Lead Metric!" Actual v Predicted performance

5 Benefits of ISO 1 certification Improved Energy Management through the use of Performance Management Using Significant Energy User (SEU) Audits to identify energy saving opportunities Involvement of Energy End Users in Energy Reduction Programme Elimination of issues that result in energy losses Improving the profile of the site within network Sustainable Energy Management System

6 Challenges of implementing ISO 1 Support from Senior Management Resources and time required for successful implementation Commitment to sustain phase Availability of accurate and timely data for efficient operation of Performance Management System Determining key factors affecting energy consumption for each SEU Development of Energy Performance Indicators (EnPIs) Interpreting the spirit of the standard

7 Performance Management and successful implementation of ISO 1

8 Key factors for ensuring that certification is obtained Good support from consultant who understands implementation process All relevant documents in place which accurately reflect company s operation SOPs in place and in use for all SEUs Good training records for all personnel working on SEUs EnPIs identified Energy Policy signed off by Site Director Legal aspects covered Process for non-conformities developed

9 Key factors for ensuring that certification is maintained Sufficient resources (personnel, budget, consultants) Up to date energy policy Key documents reflecting current situation Process in place for updating predictions and targets Appropriate training plans in place for all relevant personnel Raising non-conformities as required and completing appropriate actions Good pool of internal auditors Ensuring that findings from internal audits are closed out Measurement and Verification Plans for new projects Devolving responsibility and accountability to key users On-going support of Site Leadership Team and regular Management Reviews Energy Efficiency Reviews conducted for all new and modified installations

10 Knowledge gained from implementing Energy Efficient Design Engage with the project team as early as possible e.g. at concept design phase Use an independent consultant with Energy Efficient Design (EED) experience to assist with the process Align key EED activities with key project milestones Ensure that there are regular follow up meetings with Project Team apart from the main EED review Use an Action Register to track all actions identified during EED reviews and meetings Generate a list of design features based on opportunities identified from the site s Energy Management Programme Generate a metering plan for the new facility for all Significant Energy Users Ensure that utilities can be isolated quickly and HVAC shut down when not required Complete reviews of URS/FDS for control systems to ensure that energy efficiency has been considered Ensure that specifications for all Significant Energy Users are reviewed before tendering Challenge Utilities set points and pressures and Air Change Rates Complete reviews of all commissioning protocols, particularly for HVAC and Utilities systems Ensure that all the utilities for the new facility are metered Formalise the process used in an SOP Have a plan and dedicated resource to monitor energy use during commissioning and operation

11 Energy and Utilities Dashboard for New Facility

12 Thank you