Methodology & Learning Report. Work package 2.1: Dynamic thermal rating of assets Primary Transformers
|
|
- Donald Robinson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Flexible Networks for a Low Carbon Future Methodology & Learning Report Work package 2.1: Dynamic thermal rating of assets Primary Transformers May 2015
2 Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 2 Background 3 3 Details of the work carried out Project location Initial Proposed Methodology Subtask 1: Asset condition assessment Subtask 2: Assessment of the RTTR capability of assets Subtask 3: Recommendations for adopting an RTTR system Asset Condition Assessment Assessment of the RTTR Capability of Assets Recommendations for adopting an RTTR system Experimental validation of modelled results 9 4 The outcomes of the work St Andrews trial area Whitchurch Trial Area Business as Usual 13 5 Business Case 14 6 Conclusions 15 7 List of Appendices 16 Primary Transformers 1
3 1 Executive Summary This methodology and learning report covers the work that has been undertaken under work package 2.1 on the dynamic thermal rating of primary transformers within the project trial areas of St Andrews and Whitchurch. Much of the work was undertaken in conjunction with DNV GL. The remit given to DNV GL was broadly across 3 objectives; Condition assessment of the transformers; Determine suitability for dynamic loading; and Make recommendations for a solution. DNV GL initially carried out a data gathering exercise on the transformers followed by comprehensive site surveys that included thermal imaging, partial discharge measurement and oil sampling. The results allowed DNV GL to conclude that the transformers are suitable for careful loading above nameplate rating. DNV GL subsequently used their dynamic rating modelling tool to predict the capacity of the transformers under historic loading conditions and future loading scenarios. They further recommended the benefits that a real time thermal rating (RTTR) system could have in allowing the ultimate capacity of transformers to be realised. Further analysis by SP Energy Networks (SPEN) has revealed that associated assets in the trial areas effectively limit the increase in capacity available from the transformers to well below the level that would require a closed loop RTTR system to be deployed. We believe this will apply to most areas of our network and have therefore developed a technique that allows us to assign enhanced ratings to primary transformers using a modelling technique based on historical load profile and ambient temperature data. This technique has already been adopted and is being applied in business as usual and has enabled us to defer reinforcement projects at a number of locations resulting in savings for our customers. We believe that this is a technique that is highly replicable in other DNO s. Primary Transformers 2
4 2 Background Present industry best-practice revolves around the use of fixed equipment ratings based on conservative seasonal conditions. Improved thermal management of network assets using real-time dynamic ratings can help to release additional network capacity, potentially avoiding triggering of unnecessary network reinforcement for relatively small levels of demand growth. National standards assign different thermal ratings to network assets during each operating scenario, taking into account both the representative equipment loading and typical ambient conditions. DNOs have typically used two approaches in the past. The first is to weather correct the demand to an Average Cold Spell (ACS) reference temperature, and then to use the rating of plant at this reference temperature. It is then assumed that if it is colder, demand will increase but at a slower rate than the increase in asset rating due to lower ambient temperature. This approach is difficult to apply to summer loadings and many Network Groups do not exhibit strong temperature dependency of demand. Often, the critical case is under planned outage conditions, and these occur in the summer. The present P2/6 default of summer peak load is 67% of winter peak which is not representative enough for current or future networks. The second is to modify the rating to suit the season that the demand occurs within. Up to four seasons have been typical. Some DNOs have interpolated published ratings to give individual monthly ratings. For example, the autumn rating for overhead lines includes November and demand often increases significantly towards the end of this month and can cause ER P2/6 non-compliance on paper. Both of these existing approaches use a fixed rating. This allows the network capacity to be calculated and compared to the network demand for the scenario being assessed. The use of generic asset ratings that do not consider the actual thermal conditions experienced can lead to unnecessary triggering of network reinforcements and corrective measures to reduce load due to indications that thermal headroom is exhausted. Primary Transformers 3
5 3 Details of the work carried out 3.1 Project location Transformers were selected from each of the 3 trial areas to include a degree of climatic variation. 8 Primary transformers within the 3 trial areas were selected in order to obtain as diverse a range of ratings, ages and manufacturers as practicable. The sites chosen were as follows: - Cupar Primary (2 transformers) St Andrews Primary (2 transformers) Yockings Gate Primary Liverpool Rd Primary Whitchurch Primary Ruabon Primary Nameplate details of the transformers at these sites are included in Appendix Initial Proposed Methodology Through a competitive tendering exercise SPEN selected DNV GL to assist in this work package. The previous experience of DNV GL on the dynamic rating of assets was a significant factor in their selection. The remit for DNV GL was split into 3 subtasks Subtask 1: Asset condition assessment Description: Complete a detailed condition assessment of the 8 primary transformers and any assets directly involved with a potential transformer RTTR system. The primary transformer details are found in Appendix 1. Criteria: Provide background information, justification and approach for all testing methods chosen to produce a detailed condition assessment of each transformer. Provide information and an approach for any tests or software that can assess the limitations introduced by other assets (i.e. cables, tap changers) on a RTTR system. Detail any work that will involve SPEN staff. Provide network requirements and timescales for the tests to be completed. Complete all stated tests Subtask 2: Assessment of the RTTR capability of assets Description: Using the data gathered in work package 1 (and from other sources), provide an evaluation with reasoning on the asset capability of adopting an RTTR system at each primary substation. Criteria: Provide a predicted RTTR profile for each transformer, with appropriate reasoning. Give an estimation on the predicted rating uplift period for each transformer, with appropriate reasoning. Provide details on what is the maximum loading increase that each transformer can safely achieve, referring to the transformers end of life Give details on the factors that may limit the effectiveness of an RTTR system and suggest feasible options to reduce these limitations. Give reasoning on whether the installation of an RTTR system is worthwhile from an engineering and business perspective. Primary Transformers 4
6 3 Details of the work carried out [continued] Subtask 3: Recommendations for adopting an RTTR system Description: If a RTTR system is considered a feasible option, give recommendations on future steps regarding the criteria listed below. Criteria: Provide details on the equipment that would be needed to be installed to achieve RTTR. Recommend steps that would be involved in the delivery of an RTTR system. Describe the approach for the integration of output information into our operational systems. Provide wider recommendations into how the findings of the asset health assessments and the recommendations for the implementation of and RTTR system can apply to all SPEN primary transformers. 3.3 Asset Condition Assessment In the context of the RTTR project DNV GL assessed the condition of each transformer and estimated its remaining life. The following activities were performed: collection and analysis of the available information detailed visual inspection thermo-graphic inspection online partial discharge measurement oil analysis (dissolved gasses, quality, corrosiveness, furanic compounds) estimation of the remaining life on the basis of: furanic compounds in the oil dynamic loading-guide calculation. Primary Transformers 5
7 3 Details of the work carried out [continued] 3.3 Asset Condition Assessment [continued] The results of the condition assessment were provided in a Condition Assessment Report included in Appendix 2. The conclusions can be summarised as follows: - 1) The estimated remaining lifetime of all 8 transformers that were part of the condition assessment is over 25 years. 2) The observations during the visual inspections, thermo-graphic surveys (IR), online partial discharge measurements (PD) and oil analyses can be summarized as follows: Transformer Visual PD IR Oil St. Andrews T1 Rust OK OK OK St. Andrews T2 Rust OK Hotspot on 33 kv terminal OK Cupar T1 Rust, sweating OK OK OK Cupar T2 Rust, sweating OK OK OK Ruabon T1 OK Whitchurch T1 OK OK Yockings Gate T1 Leaking cable box Corona discharge in air Peculiar temperature profile on radiators Hotspot on 33 kvdisconnectors OK OK OK Free water Free water PD-activity Liverpool Rd. T1 Sweating OK OK PD-activity Subject to certain mitigative measures to be implemented on Ruabon T1 and Whitchurch T1, DNV GL qualified the following six transformers as being suitable for operating under overloading conditions under careful dynamic loading: St. Andrews T1 and T2 Cupar T1 and T2 Yockings Gate T1 Liverpool Road T1. Primary Transformers 6
8 3 Details of the work carried out [continued] 3.4 Assessment of the RTTR Capability of Assets DNV GL assessed the thermal behaviour of these transformers using the loading guide as a calculation model with the measured ambient temperature and load profiles. In particular, the following activities were performed: Collection and analysis of the available information Development of the thermal model Creating future load patterns, based on actual load patterns to simulate and verify a safe increase by 8%, 10% and 12% of the actual load profiles up to a peak at nameplate rating up to an 8%, 10% and 12% on top of a peak at nameplate rating up to a 15 years, 40 years and 60 years electrical lifetime Creating future load patterns, based on actual load patterns and different levels of load increase due to: Charging of electrical vehicles Generated solar energy Installation of electrical heating. DNV GL presented their findings in their report Prospects of applying RTTR to distribution transformers included in Appendix 3. From the analysis presented in this report, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1 All transformers are currently thermally low loaded 2 The temperature of the transformers is rather constant. This is due to the fact that the loading is highest in the winter when the ambient temperature is lowest and vice versa in the summer 3 Peak loadings can be increased above nameplate rating by 30-45% whilst maintaining an expected electrical lifetime of 40 years, given the situation in the current evaluation period and the parameters used in the model are sufficiently representative for the different transformers 4 With respect to integrating future loads coming from solar energy, electrical heating, electrical vehicles, etc., up to 15 MVA of additional peak loading can be allowed on top of the current load profiles 5 Close to the thermal limit, the ageing rate of the transformer increases rapidly and thus care should be taken when operating close to the thermal limit. The life time reduction increases significantly for hot spot temperatures close to and above 120 C and considering the possible impact of the hot spot factor on the hot spot temperature, it is advised to limit the hot spot temperature to 110 C. 6 Using RTTR, full transparency regarding the decision to increase the loading can be provided to regulators and auditors 7 RTTR enhances confidence in the network operation and supports timely actions like load-shedding 8 Knowledge about possible loading capabilities of transformers, gathered with an RTTR system, can be used as input for short and long-term plans for the management of the SPEN network 9 Implementing RTTR can result in significant higher benefits if compared to the necessary implementation costs and additional costs for losses Primary Transformers 7
9 3 Details of the work carried out [continued] 3.5 Recommendations for adopting an RTTR system DNV GL made the following recommendations: - 1 Due to the cyclic load pattern, the peak loading of the transformer can easily exceed the name plate rating without resulting in higher than nominal loss of life. To ensure the loss of life remains close to but below the nominal value, it is recommended to install a monitoring and real-time thermal rating system. Moreover, it is advised to take extra oil-samples during the verification tests after implementing RTTR to ensure no load-related internal defects become active. 2 From an efficiency and cost-reduction point-of-view, groups of similar transformers can be defined e.g. based on rating, manufacturer, age, location, etc. To accommodate thermal rating on such group only one thermal model is required reducing cost for software development and hardware. Investments cost can be divided over several transformers within each group. 3 It is recommended to perform a heat run test. Preferably this test needs to be done for each transformer to know its specific hotspots. To reduce costs, it could be decided to perform such a test once for each group of similar transformers, with the loss of a small amount of accuracy. 4 It is recommended to limit the hot spot temperature to 110 C to account for possible deviations of the parameters given in the IEC used in the models from the actual values. Primary Transformers 8
10 3 Details of the work carried out [continued] 3.6 Experimental validation of modelled results In order to validate the results of the modelling, experiments were undertaken. Initially the winding temperature indication / alarm / trip device on Liverpool Rd primary transformer was replaced with an electronic equivalent with remote data logging on ihost. UoS prepared a technical note based on initial measurements of transformer top oil temperature at Liverpool Road primary under normal loading conditions (Appendix 4). Key learning outcomes are: The model is somewhat effective in reproducing the general behaviour of oil temperature in response to changes in load and ambient temperature For the conditions assessed, the model significantly overestimates the oil and hotspot temperatures at any given moment, by an average of 7.5ºC and 6ºC respectively There are strong indications that the overestimate of both the oil and hotspot temperatures becomes larger as the transformer load increases The model also overestimates the daily maximum temperatures by an average of 7ºC. When planning a higher-load experiment with the model, it is therefore not necessary to allow a margin of error in the expected transformer temperatures; indeed it is likely to be possible to run at higher loads than suggested by the model The model has not been tested at high ambient temperatures or high loads: more data on performance above two thirds of nameplate rating and at warmer times of year is needed. Following the planned tests at Liverpool Road, further investigation of the model s parameters should be undertaken to determine whether a more accurate prediction of transformer behaviour can be achieved. Manufacturers thermal test data for the transformer or for one of a similar design may help to improve the accuracy of the model. In relation to the measurement of ambient temperature, the following learning point is noted: For the purposes of modelling transformer thermal behaviour, ambient temperature data from either Whitchurch weather station appears suitable. This suggests that fewer weather stations could be installed in future area deployments. Primary Transformers 9
11 4 The outcomes of the work 4.1 St Andrews trial area As explained above, in their study DNV GL developed a thermal model for the transformers at St Andrews primary substation and created future load patterns, based on actual load patterns to simulate and verify a safe increase in loading. The results of this modelling are documented in the DNV GL report Prospects of Applying RTTR to Distribution Transformers included as Appendix 3. The study concluded that peak loadings can be increased above nameplate rating by 30% while maintaining an expected technical lifetime of 40 years. A study of the other associated assets considered The 33kV cabling and OHL in the circuits supplying the transformers. The make-up of the circuits are shown below. The ratings have been checked against the ratings in the SPEN Equipment Ratings document ESDD The lowest ratings are associated with certain cable sections which have a winter cyclic rating of 24MVA. The 11kV transformer tails Transformer tails are 2x500mmCu (or imperial equivalent). The 11kV switchboard The incoming circuit breakers are Hawkgas 12 rated at 1250A with 1200A CT s. This study concluded that capacity of associated assets effectively limit the peak loading on the transformers to 24MVA, equivalent to a 14% uplift on peak loading. The long term development statement (LTDS) will be amended to include the new firm capacity. The calculation of the transformers enhanced rating requires their typical load profile to be taken into account. This profile could change in the future due to the impact of changing loads arising from, for example, low carbon technology or new connections. The Flexible Networks project has developed a tool which allows designers to calculate the enhanced rating of primary transformers, knowing the characteristics of the transformers, the ambient temperature, and their load profile. This enables the enhanced rating of the transformers to be recalculated should there be a significant change in the load profile in future. In order to maximise the potential of the transformers to achieve their theoretical remaining life it was necessary to refurbish the transformers including the installation of new cooler banks. This was undertaken in March Although this work is not required to achieve the additional capacity it is necessary to provide assurance that the capacity can be maintained over their remaining life. Primary Transformers 10
12 4 The outcomes of the work [continued] 4.2 Whitchurch Trial Area The Whitchurch group comprises of 3 single transformer primary substations : - Whitchurch, Yockings Gate, and Liverpool Rd. Intact capacity of the Whitchurch group is listed in the LTDS as 22.5MVA, (3x7.5MVA) The theoretical maximum group capacity is listed in the LTDS as 20MVA and is based on a single transformer outage with all three transformers having a cyclic rating of 130% or 10MVA. This theoretical maximum would only be achieved if the demand in the network were perfectly balanced. Therefore modelling was undertaken by TNEI to take into account actual network conditions. The network was modelled with actual demand figures from IHOST on 07/11/ (highest demand of an average winter day). This was then scaled to meet the group maximum demand listed in the LTDS. The sum of the individual substation peaks is virtually identical to the group peak. The network was assessed under N-1 conditions, reconfigured and demand uniformly grown across network until a thermal (transformer or circuit) or voltage limitation was identified. Under loss of a transformer, reconfiguration was considered to be by opening the feeder breakers and resupplying the feeder from its remote end. In general feeders are resupplied by other transformers within the group. The exceptions are four feeders out of Whitchurch it was assumed that these would be resupplied by their remote ends (Ellsemere, Overton, Wrenbury Frith, Newhall). The St Ivel feeder out of Yockings Gate was not resupplied from Prees rather it was assumed that this would be resupplied through the Yockings Gate busbars, or from Liverpool Road. Primary Transformers 11
13 4 The outcomes of the work [continued] 4.2 Whitchurch Trial Area [continued] The results of the modelling are sumarised in the table below. Network Equivallent Whitchurch 33/11 Liverpool Road 33/11 Yockings Gate 33/11 demand group N-1 flow 7.5/10MVA 7.5MVA 7.5MVA Transformer Type scaling loading through 10 / / / 10 Existing Rating (Intact/N-1) factor Study Condition under Intact transformers 11 / / / 11 Enhanced Rating (Intact/N-1) Intact Unscaled BASECASE demand N-1 LIV RD Existing - limited by feeder thermal issues Thermal overload on HV feeder near Girls High School N-1 LIV RD Transformer ratings enhanced by 10% Limitation is Whitchurch transformer Capacity release through Transformer enhanced rating % N-1 YOCK Existing Limitation is Whitchurch transformer N-1 YOCK Transformer ratings enhanced by 10% Limitation is still Whitchurch transformer Capacity release through Transformer enhanced rating % N-1 WHIT Existing Limitation is Liverpool Rd transformer N-1 WHIT Transformer ratings enhanced by 10% Limitation is still Liverpool Rd transformer Capacity release through Transformer enhanced rating % (Under N-1 configuration some feeders are supplied by remote ends, consequently group demand had to be increased more before issues were identified. This level of group demand would be expected to be limited under intact conditions) For all three transformer outage conditions studied, enhancing the rating of the transformer by 10% released significant amounts of capacity. For outage of the Liverpool Road transformer, the first limitation identified was a thermal overload on an HV feeder near the Girls High School. Although some demand on this feeder could be moved by operating the telecontrolled switching points to move the normally open point from Bargates to Green End Arcade. The loading on the Whitchurch transformer would increase to its maximum continuous ONAF rating of 10MVA. For the purposes of this analysis, this is considered to be the existing limitation of the group. Enhancing the thermal rating of the Whitchurch transformer was able to release approximately 10% of existing firm capacity as it enables the above reconfiguration which alleviates the HV feeder constraint. The next constraint was the enhanced thermal rating of the Whitchurch transformer. Firm capacity was considered to increase from 17.34MVA to 19.11MVA (10.2%) For outages of either of the Whitchurch or Yockings Gate transformers, the HV feeder network was not found to limit the capacity. The first limitation was the cyclic rating of other transformers in the group. Under N-1 of the Whitchurch transformer, some feeders were supplied by remote ends (Ellsemere, Overton, Wrenbury Frith, Newhall). Consequently the group demand is lower under these conditions and this is therefore not expected to be the limiting contingency for the group. Results also indicated that under N-1 conditions, loading on Yockings Gate could be managed so that it doesn t exceed 10MVA (and therefore does not require enhanced rating). As a consequence of the above assessment the firm capacity of the Whitchurch group in the LTDS will be increased by 10%. Primary Transformers 12
14 4 The outcomes of the work [continued] 4.3 Business as Usual Having reviewed all of the learning from this work package we have concluded that it is not necessary to implement a closed loop real time thermal rating system as recommended by DNV GL in order to get the benefit of additional capacity above nameplate that is available from primary transformers. The explanation for this decision is as follows. The results of 2 separate studies within the project have shown that, given the cyclic nature of our loads, it is possible to increase peak loading up to around 30% above nameplate rating. However In real networks there are usually associated assets such as cables and switchgear that restrict the potential peak loading below this level. The Transformer Loading Tool developed under the project enables the individual historic loading profile and site specific ambient temperatures to be used to determine the Enhanced Rating for a primary transformer. We have taken the decision that where enhanced ratings are being implemented it is prudent to replace the existing winding temperature indicator (WTI) and its associated alarm and trip outputs with a modern electronic unit. The reasons for this are firstly because the transformer could be operating at a higher temperature it is important that the alarm and trip settings are accurate. Secondly, the new instrument provides an analogue output signal that enables the transformer temperature to be presented in real time on the operational network management system, and logged centrally for subsequent review. We have also commenced trials of an online dissolved gas analysis instrument to investigate whether this provides any useful data in relation to primary transformers subject to enhanced rating. We have therefore developed the following methodology for the Enhanced Rating of primary transformers: - 1. Carry out a desktop study of our reinforcement programme to identify primary transformers that are candidates for enhanced rating. That is where the typical level of enhanced rating that we expect would result in the deferment of traditional reinforcement. 2. Use the Transformer Loading Tool developed under the project to model the transformer using actual historic loading data and ambient temperature to give the potential enhanced rating of the transformer. 3. Examine associated network assets, typically cables, overhead lines, and switchgear for any limitations on capacity that they impose. 4. Therefore determine the resulting enhanced firm capacity of the substation or group and confirm that this is sufficient to defer conventional reinforcement. 5. Carry out a condition survey of the transformer including oil tests to verify that the transformer is suitable condition for enhanced rating. Undertake refurbishment where necessary and economically viable. 6. Retrofit an electronic winding temperature instrument with remote temperature data availability. 7. Revise the substation or group firm capacity stated within the LTDS. 8. At regular intervals,(e.g. annual or bi-annual) re-run the transformer model with updated loading data and review the transformer temperature data log. 9. Revise as necessary the firm capacity stated within the LTDS. Primary Transformers 13
15 5 Business Case The enhanced rating of primary transformers can facilitate the deferral of conventional reinforcement under different scenarios. Considering 2 typical applications: - Deferral of 33kV Primary Substation Construction In this scenario the existing primary substation is nearing capacity and is already equipped with transformers of around the standard maximum rating employed. The lowest cost traditional method would be the provision of an additional primary substation including two new 33/11kV transformers, new 11kV switchgear, new 33 kv overhead line or underground cable, and extensive cable works to reconfigure the 11kV network. In our experience such projects take approximately 3 years to implement and the typical total cost is 6,200k. In appropriate circumstances, enhanced rating of primary transformers can defer the requirement for conventional reinforcement. The duration of the deferral period will be dependent on the rate of load growth which is itself dependant on a number of factors including the future uptake of low carbon technology. We consider the technique to be applicable where a deferral period of at least 8 years can reasonably be expected based on a range of load growth scenarios. Referring to our Cost Benefit Analysis (Appendix 5) the average cost of implementing enhanced transformer rating at a 2 transformer primary substation is estimated at 30k. Therefore under this scenario an expenditure of 6,200k is expected to be deferred for a minimum period of 8 years for an expenditure of 30k. Deferral of 33kV Transformer Reinforcement In these circumstances a primary substation is nearing capacity, however the existing transformer(s) have a significantly lower rating that the present standard maximum rating employed. The lowest cost traditional method would be the replacement of the transformer(s) with new units having a higher rating, together with associated civil works and any upgrading of cables required. The budget costs for a typical project are 300k per transformer. In appropriate circumstances, enhanced rating of primary transformers can defer the requirement for conventional reinforcement. Again, the duration of the deferral period will be dependent on the rate of load growth and we consider the technique to be applicable where a deferral period of at least 8 years can reasonably be expected based on a range of load growth scenarios. Referring to our Cost Benefit Analysis the average cost of implementing enhanced transformer rating is estimated at 15k per transformer. Therefore under this scenario an expenditure of 300k is expected to be deferred for a minimum period of 8 years for an expenditure of 15k. Under both of the above scenarios significant savings are achieved for our customers. Primary Transformers 14
16 6 Conclusions This work package has successfully facilitated the increase in firm capacity of the primary substations in the trial areas of St Andrews and Whitchurch, thereby contributing to the success criteria for the project. Benefits from this work package are however much more wide ranging. Our knowledge of the thermal behaviour of primary transformers has been greatly enhanced. We have introduced the technique of enhanced ratings for primary transformers into our business as usual processes, and that has enabled us to defer reinforcement projects at a number of locations resulting in savings for our customers. We believe that this is a technique that is highly replicable in other DNO s. Primary Transformers 15
17 7 List of Appendices Appendix 1 Nameplate Details of Transformers Appendix 2 Condition Assessment Report (DNV GL) Appendix 3 Prospects of applying RTTR to distribution transformers (DNV GL) Appendix 4 Experimental Validation Report Appendix 5 Cost Benefit Analysis Primary Transformers 16
STRATEGIC INTERCONNECTED NETWORK TRANSITIONING
STRATEGIC INTERCONNECTED NETWORK TRANSITIONING Malcolm BEBBINGTON Russell BRYANS Alberto ELENA DE LEONARDO SP Energy Networks UK TNEI Services Ltd UK SP Energy Networks UK Malcolm.Bebbington2@spenergys.co.uk
Improved transformer temperature monitoring. Increasing the availability, reliability, and reducing maintenance costs COLUMN ABSTRACT KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT This article discusses transformer temperature monitoring where a strategy of reduction in maintenance costs and outages, by replacing older ancillary technology with modern IEDs, can offer a
Draft Project Assessment Report. Dromana Supply Area. Project UE-DZA-S RIT-D Report
Draft Project Assessment Report RIT-D Report This report presents the network limitations at Dromana zone substation and the distribution feeder network within the Dromana / Mornington supply areas, including
NIA Project Registration and PEA Document
Date of Submission September 2016 NIA Project Registration and PEA Document Notes on Completion: Please refer to the appropriate NIA Governance Document to assist in the completion of this form. The full
HV and LV Phase Imbalance Assessment. Report No: D4
Flexible Networks for a Low Carbon Future HV and LV Phase Imbalance Assessment Report No: 7640 07 D4 September 2015 Report N o 7640-07 Page 2 of 52 DOCUMENT HISTORY AND STATUS CONFIDENTIALITY (Confidential
FINAL REPORT GREEN SQUARE ZONE ADDITIONAL TRANSFORMER
FINAL REPORT GREEN SQUARE ZONE ADDITIONAL TRANSFORMER 31 st May 2010 Disclaimer This document has been prepared and made available solely for information purposes and consultation under the National Electricity
CLNR Trial Analysis Real-Time Thermal Rating Underground Cables
CLNR Trial Analysis Real-Time Thermal Rating Underground Cables DOCUMENT NUMBER CLNR-L131 AUTHORS Peter Davison, Newcastle University ISSUE DATE 22/12/2014 University of Durham, and EA Technology Ltd,
Customer-Led Network Revolution Cost Benefit Analysis
Customer-Led Network Revolution Cost Benefit Analysis DOCUMENT NUMBER CLNR-L144 AUTHORS Duncan Yellen, Laurence Elner, EA Technology Limited ISSUE DATE 27 March 2015 Contents Executive Summary... 2 1 Introduction...
Addressing reliability requirements in the Flemington substation load area
Addressing reliability requirements in the Flemington substation load area Notice on screening for non-network options May 2018 Title of Contents DISCLAIMER... 1 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 2 FORECAST LOAD AND
WPD Innovation. Paul Jewell Policy Manager
WPD Innovation Paul Jewell Policy Manager Who are WPD? Distribution Network Operator Midlands, South West and Wales 7.8 million customers 55,500 square kilometres 220,000km of lines & cable 185,000 substations
Low Carbon Networks Fund Review and Synthesis
Low Carbon Networks Fund Review and Synthesis Damien Frame Keith Bell and Stephen McArthur University of Strathclyde damien.frame@strath.ac.uk The Low Carbon Network Fund 500m 5 Years Ofgem DNOs Electricity
THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SECURITY AND PLANNING STANDARDS. Asset Management & Regulation, ESB Networks
THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SECURITY AND PLANNING STANDARDS. Issued by: Review Cycle: Asset Management & Regulation, ESB Networks Three years Contents 1.0 Introduction....3 1.1 Definitions...3 1.2 Aim of Planning...5
MANGING THE FUTURE NETWORK IMPACT OF THE ELECTRIFICATION OF HEAT
MANGING THE FUTURE NETWORK IMPACT OF THE ELECTRIFICATION OF HEAT Stephen HARKIN Delta-ee UK Stephen.harkin@delta-ee.com Andrew TURTON Delta-ee UK Andrew.turton@delta-ee.com ABSTRACT The partial electrification
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION P2/6 SECURITY OF SUPPLY JULY Energy Networks Association Engineering Directorate
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION P2/6 SECURITY OF SUPPLY JULY 2006 Energy Networks Association Engineering Directorate NORTHERN IRELAND ELECTRICITY Ltd AMENDMENT SHEET ISSUE 1 - MAY 2015 SECURITY OF SUPPLY DOCUMENT
Adapting Distribution Network Planning Practices and Design Standards to Accommodate Distributed Energy Resources
21, rue d Artois, F-75008 PARIS CIGRE US National Committee http : //www.cigre.org 2016 Grid of the Future Symposium Adapting Distribution Network Planning Practices and Design Standards to Accommodate
PJM White Paper. Transource Independence Energy Connection Market Efficiency Project
PJM White Paper PJM Interconnection November 15, 2018 This page is intentionally left blank. PJM 2018 www.pjm.com i P a g e Contents Highlights... 1 Executive Summary... 1 I. Introduction... 2 Reliability
TEMPORARY GRID RECONFIGURATIONS NET BENEFIT TEST METHODOLOGY
TEMPORARY GRID RECONFIGURATIONS NET BENEFIT TEST METHODOLOGY 1 1. Summary When one part of the grid is facing security of supply risk where local generation in one region of the grid is not enough for
Inspection and Monitoring of Networks Constructed by Independent Connection Providers
1. SCOPE This document details SP Energy Networks (SPEN) inspection and escalation regime for contestable works constructed (ICPs) that will be adopted by SPEN. 2. ISSUE RECORD This is a Controlled document.
Kintyre Hunterston Link. The upgrade of grid access in Kintyre
The upgrade of grid access in Kintyre About us Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission plc (SHE Transmission), part of Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution (SSEPD), is the licensed electricity
DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
EB-00-00 Exhibit F Tab Schedule Filed: 00 Aug Page of DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 0 PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE Predictive maintenance expenditures fund work that is required to test and audit distribution
Supporting Document 03. Information to support our proposed base capital expenditure programme
Supporting Document 03 Information to support our proposed base capital expenditure programme Information to support our proposed base capital expenditure programme Summary This document sets out Scottish
Ergon Energy Corporation Limited 4 June 2010
Ergon Energy Corporation Limited 4 June 2010 Disclaimer While care was taken in preparation of the information in this discussion paper, and it is provided in good faith, Ergon Energy Corporation Limited
COST ALLOCATION POLICY FOR VICTORIAN TERMINAL STATIONS NEGOTIATED TRANSMISSION SERVICES
COST ALLOCATION POLICY FOR VICTORIAN TERMINAL STATIONS NEGOTIATED PREPARED BY: Network Development VERSION: 2.0 RELEASE DATE: 30 May 2012 Version Release History Version Date By Changes 1.0 6 Oct 11 Transmission
Future Roadmap for Improvement of HV & LV Network Modelling. Report No: R0
Flexible Networks for a Low Carbon Future Future Roadmap for Improvement of HV & LV Network Modelling Report No: 7640-08-R0 September 2015 Report N o 7640-08 Page 2 of 68 DOCUMENT HISTORY AND STATUS CONFIDENTIALITY
Smart Distribution Applications and Technologies - Program 124
Smart Distribution Applications and Technologies - Program 124 Program Description Program Overview New technologies will be critical to future smart grid operation. These technologies will include advanced
Featured Product. Transformer Monitoring and Diagnostic Systems
Featured Product Transformer Monitoring and Diagnostic Systems Transformer Predictive Analysis Owners of critical transformer equipment can realize the benefits of predictive analysis on transformer health
Distribution Network Planning for Mumbai
Newsletter Issue 98 January 2006 Distribution Network Planning for Mumbai Carsten Böse Project Manager Siemens AG, PTD SE PT carsten.boese@siemens.com Introduction The Indian utility Reliance Energy Ltd.
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY TRANSMISSION PLANNING CRITERIA
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY TRANSMISSION PLANNING CRITERIA Transmission Planning Criteria Updated: March Compiled: September 2007 Compiled from: s Comprehensive Transmission Reliability Plan, July 2005 s Strategic
Black Start Strategy
Issue 1 Revision Black Start Strategy Produced in accordance with Standard Condition C16 of the NGET Transmission Licence Effective from 1 st April 2017 to 31 st March 2018 DOCUMENT HISTORY Version 1.0
Community Clean Energy Resiliency Initiative PON-ENE BESS Request for Proposals Question and Answer Log
Community Clean Energy Resiliency Initiative PON-ENE-2014-036 BESS Request for Proposals Question and Answer Log 03/09/16 Lead Time 1. The schedule included in the BESS RFP for the energy storage project
BELLS POND-WAITAKI TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINT - PROPOSED APPROACH INFORMATION DOCUMENT
BELLS POND-WAITAKI TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINT - PROPOSED APPROACH INFORMATION DOCUMENT CONTINGENCY PLANS NET BENEFIT ANALYSIS Transpower New Zealand Limited October 2016 i Table of Contents Proposal Summary...
ECP SECONDARY COMMISSIONING REQUIREMENTS
Document Number: ECP 11-0002 Network(s): Summary: ENGINEERING COMMISSIONING PROCEDURE ECP 11-0002 SECONDARY COMMISSIONING REQUIREMENTS EPN, LPN, SPN This standard details the commissioning requirements
Transmission Losses Report 2015
SP Energy Networks October 2015 Transmission Losses Report 2015 1. INTRODUCTION Special condition 2K of SPT s transmission licence requires SPT to publish an annual transmission losses report detailing
Network Options Assessment Report Methodology
Network Options Assessment Report Methodology ; System Operator April 2018 Version DRAFT 4.0 Date 9 April 2018 About this document This document contains National Grid s Network Options Assessment (NOA)
East Kentucky Power Cooperative (EKPC) Transmission System Planning Criteria
East Kentucky Power Cooperative (EKPC) Transmission System Planning Criteria March 2016 Section 1 Overview and General Discussion The primary purpose of East Kentucky Power Cooperative s (EKPC s) transmission
Rochelle Municipal Utilities TRANSMISSION PLANNING CRITERIA. March 21, 2017
Rochelle Municipal Utilities TRANSMISSION PLANNING CRITERIA March 21, 2017 Contents 1 Background...3 2 National and Regional Criteria and Guides...4 2.1 2.1 NERC Transmission Planning Standards...4 2.2
Stakeholder Communication. Inputs, Assumptions, and Preliminary Assessment. Base Model. Needs, Solutions, Sensitivity: Yr 5
Methodology and Assumptions 1.1 Overview These sections describe the process we used to perform a network assessment of the ATC transmission system. The description includes study assumptions, methods
IMP/001/914 Code of Practice for the Economic Development of the 132kV System
Version:- 3.0 Date of Issue:- September 2015 Page 1 of 36 IMP/001/914 Code of Practice for the Economic Development of the 132kV System 1 Purpose The purpose of this document is to state Northern Powergrid
UK Power Networks. Smart Grid Strategy
UK Power Networks Smart Grid Strategy Contents 1 Executive summary 3 2 Introduction 4 2.1 Suite of documents on innovation and smart grids 4 2.2 Correspondence to Ofgem s requirements 5 3 Introducing our
Transmission Losses Report 2017
SP Energy Networks October 2017 Transmission Losses Report 2017 1. INTRODUCTION Special condition 2K of the SP Transmission plc (SPT) transmission licence requires SPT to publish an annual transmission
7. Electrical Facility Ratings
7. Electrical Facility Ratings 7.1 Accredited Net Generating Capacity This Section shall be used to determine the annual and seasonal accredited net generating capacity of generators in calculating the
Joint TSO/DSO Group Processing Approach Pricing Principles Guidelines
Joint TSO/DSO Group Processing Approach Pricing Principles Guidelines Published: 27/02/2007 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...3 2 Connection Method Principles...5 3 Connection Charging Principles...8
Jemena Electricity Networks (Vic) Ltd
Jemena Electricity Networks (Vic) Ltd Flemington Zone Substation RIT-D Stage 2: Draft Project Assessment Report Public 16 December 2016 An appropriate citation for this paper is: Flemington Zone Substation
Submission to the Economic Regulation Authority
Submission to the Economic Regulation Authority APPROVAL OF NEW FACILITIES INVESTMENT Installation of a second 330/132 kv transformer at Kemerton Terminal and construction of a 132 kv transmission line
Copyright: DOI link to article: Date deposited: Newcastle University eprints - eprint.ncl.ac.
Wade NS, Wang K, Michel M, Willis T. Demonstration of a 200 kw/200 kwh energy storage system on an 11kV UK distribution feeder. In: 2013 4th IEEE/PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT EUROPE).
RCP2 Project Overview Document
RCP2 Project Overview Document Project: Expenditure Class: Base Capex Expenditure Category: Grid - Enhancement & Development As at date: 15 November 2013 Expenditure Forecast Real 2012/13 NZ$ (m) 2015-2016
Demand Side Engagement Strategy. Version 2.0 Effective Date: 08/02/18
Demand Side Engagement Strategy Version 2.0 Effective Date: 08/02/18 Document management Version control Date Version Description Author 16/07/2013 0.1 Initial Draft. Y. Jayathilaka 23/07/2013 0.2 Revised
Lifetime Decisions. Investments can be planned, lifetime costs of equipment made transparent and decisions based on informed fact.
Lifetime Decisions Ageing assets, rising energy demand, and the need to deliver without outage are issues facing utilities and industries around the world. At the same time, financial constraints demand
Ergon Energy Corporation Limited
Ergon Energy Corporation Limited Final Report Emerging Distribution Network Limitations in the Central Toowoomba Area 16 May 2013 Disclaimer While care was taken in preparation of the information in this
SGC switchgears compatible with real service conditions : Solutions that address on-site conditions Pieter Himpens
SGC switchgears compatible with real service conditions : Solutions that address on-site conditions Pieter Himpens Pieter.Himpens@switchgearcompany.eu Frederik Delobelle Frederik.Delobelle@switchgearcompany.eu
GSR016: Small and Medium Embedded Generation Assumptions
Stage 01: Workgroup National Electricity Transmission System Security and Quality of Supply Standards (NETS SQSS) GSR016: Small and Medium Embedded Generation Assumptions 01 02 03 Workgroup Industry Consultation
Standard TPL Transmission System Planning Performance Requirements
A. Introduction 1. Title: Transmission System Planning Performance Requirements 2. Number: TPL-001-4 3. Purpose: Establish Transmission system planning performance requirements within the planning horizon
Distribution Information Exchange Code
Distribution Information Exchange Code Version 5.1 Approved September 2007 Comments to this document can be forwarded to: The RSA Grid Code Secretariat Attention: Mr. Bernard Magoro Eskom, Transmission
Regulatory 4 March 2011Test - Request for Information
Ergon Energy Corporation Limited Regulatory 4 March 2011Test - Request for Information Emerging Distribution Network Limitations in the South Mackay Area 28 October 2013 Ergon Energy Corporation Limited
Title: Kingsnorth. Author: URS / C Winch. Version: 1.6. Date: June SPN Regional Development Plan
Title: SPN Author: URS / C Winch Version: 1.6 Date: June 2013 UK Power Networks (Operations) Limited. Page 1 of 28 Registered in England and Wales. Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 1.1 PROPOSED PROJECTS...
ASSOCIATED NERC STANDARD(S): TPL (referred to as TPL-001 in this document) IMPLEMENTATION: In effect when approved.
ASSOCIATED NERC STANDARD(S): TPL-001-4 (referred to as TPL-001 in this document) IMPLEMENTATION: In effect when approved. Phase in of individual TPL-001 requirements will be based on the effective dates
IMP/001/911 Code of Practice for the Economic Development of the LV System
Version:- 5.0 Date of Issue:- June 2018 Page:- 1 of 53 IMP/001/911 Code of Practice for the Economic Development of the LV System 1. Purpose The purpose of this document is to state Northern Powergrid
Community Energy Projects. Our guide to getting a connection
Community Energy Projects Our guide to getting a connection Contents Introduction 04 What is Community Energy? 05 About Northern Powergrid 07 Competition in connections 08 Other useful community energy
The effectiveness of oil analysis for failure prediction of power transformers
The effectiveness of oil analysis for failure prediction of power transformers by Krige Visser and Yashin Brihmohan, University of Pretoria The availability of an electricity network is of utmost importance
IMP/001/010 Code of Practice for Standard Arrangements for Customer Connections
Version:- 6.0 Date of Issue:- August 2015 Page 1 of 62 IMP/001/010 Code of Practice for Standard Arrangements for Customer Connections 1 Purpose The purpose of this document is to state Northern Powergrid
IMP/001/010 Code of Practice for Standard Arrangements for Customer Connections
Version:- 6.1 Date of Issue:- August 2017 Page 1 of 59 IMP/001/010 Code of Practice for Standard Arrangements for Customer Connections 1 Purpose The purpose of this document is to state Northern Powergrid
EDS HV CUSTOMER DEMAND AND GENERATION SUPPLIES
Document Number: EDS 08-3100 Network(s): Summary: ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARD EDS 08-3100 HV CUSTOER DEAND AND GENERATION SUPPLIES EPN, LPN, SPN This standard provides guidelines for new HV customer demand
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY FERC Form 715 (Part 4) - Transmission Planning Study Guidelines Transmission Reliability Guidelines 1. General Overview The reliability guidelines used to plan the transmission
OPTIMAL RECLOSER DEPLOYMENT TO LEVERAGE SELF-HEALING: A TECHNO-ECONOMIC ROBUSTNESS ASSESSMENT
OPTIMAL RECLOSER DEPLOYMENT TO LEVERAGE SELF-HEALING: A TECHNO-ECONOMIC ROBUSTNESS ASSESSMENT Eduardo RODRIGUES Ismael MIRANDA Nuno SILVA EFACEC Portugal EFACEC Portugal EFACEC - Portugal eduardo.rodrigues@efacec.com
Increasing Efficiency On The Transmission Grid With Real Time Monitoring
Increasing Efficiency On The Transmission Grid With Real Time Monitoring Joint CEA Transmission Council & Corporate Partners Committee Strategic Workshop February 25, 2009 Presented by: Ron Stelmak The
Management of electricity distribution network losses
Innovation Funding Incentive (IFI) Management of electricity distribution network losses Executive summary February 2014 Imperial College Goran Strbac, Predrag Djapic, Enrique Ortega, Vladimir Stanojevic,
Network Options Assessment Report Methodology
Network Options Assessment Report Methodology ; System Operator July 2017 Version FINAL 3.1 Date 26 July 2017 About this document This document contains National Grid s Network Options Assessment (NOA)
Section 3 Firm Access Quantities and Associated Transmission Reinforcements
GATE 3 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Latest Update May 2013 Section 3 Firm Access Quantities and Associated Transmission Reinforcements 1. What does the term Firm Access Quantity or FAQ mean? 2. I own or
CAISO Generator Deliverability Assessment Methodology. On-Peak Deliverability Assessment Methodology (for Resource Adequacy Purposes)
Background On-Peak Deliverability Assessment Methodology (for Resource Adequacy Purposes) The CAISO s deliverability study methodology for resource adequacy purposes was discussed extensively in the CPUC
Overview of the Sheffield-Highgate Export Interface (SHEI)
Overview of the Sheffield-Highgate Export Interface (SHEI) Draft June 29, 2017 DRAFT Public VELCO Table of Contents Page Introduction... 1 Transmission reinforcements are driven by reliability, not economics...
Exhibit to Agenda Item #1
Exhibit to Agenda Item #1 Board Directors Meeting Wednesday,, scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. Customer Service Center, Rubicon Room Powering forward. Together. Agenda 2016 SD-4 annual monitoring report
Systems Commissioning Table of Contents
Systems Commissioning Table of Contents C NC NA I. General II. Commissioning III. Mechanical Systems A. Testing, Adjusting, and Balancing B. Piping IV. Electrical Systems A. Load Balancing B. Electrical
1.3 Planning Assumptions and Model Development
Section 1: Process Overview In addition, projects that originate through local Transmission Owner planning will be posted on the PJM web site. This site will include all currently planned transmission
FAC Version 1.1. Report Date: March 21, Authored by. Terry Harbour, MidAmerican Energy
STANDARD APPLICATION GUIDE FAC-008-3 Version 1.1 Report Date: March 21, 2017 Authored by Andy Dolan, American Transmission Company Kerry Livingston, Great River Energy Terry Harbour, MidAmerican Energy
DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
EB-00-0 Exhibit F Schedule Page of 0 DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE Preventive Maintenance is intended to maintain or improve customer service reliability, extend equipment
Company Directive STANDARD TECHNIQUE : OC1A/5. Relating to High Voltage System Control and Switching
Company Directive STANDARD TECHNIQUE : OC1A/5 Relating to High Voltage System Control and Switching Document Summary: This documents describes WPD procedure related to High Voltage System Control and Switching.
Transmission System Security and Planning Standards
ver. 1.4 page 1 from 13 Transmission System Security and Planning Standards April 2014 ver. 1.4 page 2 from 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 4 2 Definitions... 4 2.1 Transmission System... 4 2.2
EVALUATING INVESTMENT DEFERRAL BY INCORPORATING DISTRIBUTED GENERATION IN DISTRIBUTION NETWORK PLANNING
EVALUATING INVESTMENT DEFERRAL BY INCORPORATING DISTRIBUTED GENERATION IN DISTRIBUTION NETWORK PLANNING D. T-C. Wang d.wang@ed.ac.uk L. F. Ochoa luis_ochoa@ieee.org G. P. Harrison gareth.harrison@ed.ac.uk
NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT
Hydro One Networks Inc. 483 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M5G 2P5 NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT Toronto Region Date: October 18, 2017 Prepared by: Toronto Region Study Team Disclaimer This Needs Assessment Report
CIRED Workshop - Lyon, 7>8 June 2010 Paper 0004 ABSTRACT WHAT IS ISCM? INTRODUCTION WHY ISCM?
ISCM, INTEGRATED SUBSTATION CONDITION MONITORING Norbert KAISER Markus SCHULER Chris CHARLSON Germany Germany UK nkkaiser@siemens.com markus.schuler@siemens.com chris.charlson@siemens.com ABSTRACT This
Connect and Manage Guidance March 2013
Connect and Manage Guidance March 2013 Version 2.0 page 1 of 16 Contents Introduction...3 Enabling and Wider Works...4 Connect and Manage Derogations...9 Connection Applications...10 User Commitment...11
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ASSET CONDITION ASSESSMENT UPDATE
EB-0-0 Exhibit D Page of DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ASSET CONDITION ASSESSMENT UPDATE 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Over the past number of years, THESL has put considerable effort into its Asset Management
Distribution System Design General Requirements
Electricity Policy Document 279 Issue 7 September 2017 Distribution System Design General Requirements Contents 1 Introduction 2 Scope 3 Definitions 4 General Requirements 5 Documents Referenced 6 Keywords
Pricing Methodology for Gas Distribution Services. From 1 October 2018
Pricing Methodology for Gas Distribution Services From 1 October 2018 Pursuant to: The Gas Distribution Information Disclosure Determination 2012 - Consolidated in 2015 1 INTRODUCTION Vector owns and operates
Transmission Owner Asset Management
Transmission Owner Asset Management Pieces of Asset Management New customers, load growth, repairs, maintenance, operational issues, etc. All the pieces make up the asset management plan for repair or
for a Low Carbon Future A Successor to ER P2/6 - Existing issues and lessons from Flexible
Flexible Networks for a Low Carbon Future A Successor to ER P2/6 - Existing issues and lessons from Flexible Networks for a Low Carbon Future February 2015 A successor to ER P2/6: existing issues and lessons
Route to Authorisation
Route to orisation 1. SCOPE This document was previously included in OPSAF-13-001 orisation Procedures as Attachment 1 Route to orisation Manual. This document has now been issued as an individual document
The Distribution System Security and Planning Standards
The Distribution System Security and Planning Standards (Demand customers only) Date: September 2003 Status: Approved Distribution System Operator ESB Networks Revision 1 September 2003, Page 1 of 26 Contents
Lower Mornington Peninsula Supply Area
Non Network Options Report RIT-D Report This report presents the sub-transmission network limitations in the lower Mornington Peninsula including options and technical characteristics of non-network options
safe reliable affordable GENERATOR COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 1 21 September 2015 TITLE: PREPARED BY: SYSTEM ANALYSIS & SOLUTIONS
TITLE: GENERATOR COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS PREPARED BY: SYSTEM ANALYSIS & SOLUTIONS DOCUMENT STATUS: FINAL REVISION: DATE: 1 21 September 2015 2015 Electricity Networks Corporation trading
PART A - The Proposal...IV PART B Justification Introduction...1
Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A - The Proposal...IV PART B Justification...1 1 Introduction...1 1.1 Purpose...1 1.2 Background to the Proposals...1 1.3 Document structure...1 1.4 Glossary/terminology...2
UHS 10kA Arrester. Certified Test Report IEC
CP No.: CP0606 Page 1 of 10 UHS 10kA Arrester Certified Test Report IEC 60099-4 2004 CERTIFICATION Statements made and data shown are, to the best of our knowledge and belief, correct and within the usual
Plan. Security of Supply Participant Rolling Outage. Plan
Plan Security of Supply Participant Rolling Outage Security of Supply - Participant Rolling Outage Plan 31 March 2017 Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT... 1 2 DEFINITIONS... 1 2.1 Associated
Critical Load Serving Capability by Microgrid using 100% Renewable Energy
21, rue d Artois, F-75008 PARIS CIGRE US National Committee http : //www.cigre.org 2016 Grid of the Future Symposium Critical Load Serving Capability by Microgrid using 100% Renewable Energy P. PENKEY,
Oil Regeneration in 132kV and 33kV Transformers 6 December 2017
1 Oil Regeneration in 132kV and 33kV Transformers 6 December 2017 Paul Marshall Innovation Project Manager Agenda Introduction Research IFI oil regeneration project Oil regeneration results Oil regeneration
Targeted Deployment of Solar Generation using Advanced Inverters. J. VALENZUELA J. WOODARD J. SALSMAN National Grid USA
21, rue d Artois, F-75008 PARIS CIGRE US National Committee http : //www.cigre.org 2015 Grid of the Future Symposium Targeted Deployment of Solar Generation using Advanced Inverters J. VALENZUELA J. WOODARD
Grid Modernization Initiatives at ComEd
Grid Modernization Initiatives at ComEd i-pcgrid Workshop 2017 Michelle Blaise SVP, Technical Services ComEd ComEd, An Exelon Company Our Customers: 3.85 million customers in northern Illinois, including
Justus B.C Mtolera Mtera Hydro plant Manager TANESCO TANZANIA
Justus B.C Mtolera Mtera Hydro plant Manager TANESCO TANZANIA MAINTENANCE & REFURBISHMENT OF MTERA HYDRO POWER PLANT Layout: 1. Introduction 2. Technical data of Mtera Hydro Power Plant 3. Maintenance
Outage Scheduling Manual
MANUAL 29 Outage Scheduling Manual July 2015 2.2 Transmission Facilities Outage Scheduling Procedures To provide the NYISO with enough time to perform the required studies and verify power system thermal,
Northern Powergrid Appendix B for ENA Engineering Recommendation G81 Part 4: Design and Planning
Version:- 2.0 Date of Issue:- Sept 2013 Page 1 of 10 Northern Powergrid Appendix B for ENA Engineering Recommendation G81 Part 4: Design and Planning Framework for design and planning, materials specification,