Noise Assessment Report
|
|
- Ami Crawford
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Noise Assessment Report 176 Greenfield Avenue Prepared for: TC United Group Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. February 8, 2016
2 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Introduction February 8, 2016 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF REPORT LOCATION NOISE LEVEL CRITERIA GUIDELINES OBSERVATIONS AND CALCULATIONS NOISE LEVEL PREDICTIONS ROAD TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROJECTED NOISE LEVELS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NOISE IMPACTS INDOOR NOISE MITIGATION AIF METHOD LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Noise Criteria for Residential Land Use... 3 Table 2 Combination of Road and Rail Noise Daytime Outdoor, Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements... 3 Table 3 Combination of Road and Rail Noise, Night-Time Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements... 4 Table 4 Road and Rail Noise Building Component Requirements... 4 Table 5 Traffic Volumes Greenfield Avenue and Main Street, 2-Lane Urban Arterial... 5 Table 6 Traffic Volumes Highway 417, 8-Lane Highway... 6 Table 7 Distance Adjustment Factor... 7 Table 8 Summary of Projected Unattenuated Noise Levels... 7 Table 9 AIF Summary LIST OF FIGURES Figure Greenfield Avenue Development... 2 Figure 2 Indoor Receiver Sites Plan View... 8 Figure 3 Outdoor Receiver Sites Plan View... 9 Figure 4 Indoor Noise Clauses Daytime Figure 5 Indoor Noise Clauses Nighttime Figure 6 Outdoor Noise Clauses LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS... A.1 A.1 Indoor Receiver Stamson Reports... A.2 A.2 Outdoor Receiver Stamson Reports... A.3
3 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Introduction February 8, 2016 APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D NOISE WARNING CLAUSES... B.1 AIF AND BUILDING COMPONENTS... C.1 ORNAMENT TECHNICAL DOCUMENT SECTION D.1
4 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Introduction February 8, INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF REPORT Stantec Consulting Ltd. has been retained by TC United Group to prepare an environmental noise assessment for the proposed 3 storey student apartment at 176 Greenfield Avenue, located in Ottawa East in the City of Ottawa. A site plan control application is being prepared and a Noise Assessment Study is required to address City policies regarding residential development adjacent to highways and arterial roads. The purpose of this report is to: outline the Ministry s guidelines and criteria for noise levels and residential land use; apply the noise level standards of the Ontario Ministry of the Environment to the site in conjunction with the City of Ottawa document Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (2006); determine the extent to which noise levels will be of concern to future residents of the proposed development, using the computerized version (STAMSON 5.03) of the M.O.E. s noise model; and outline recommendations for noise attenuation, as necessary, to achieve acceptable noise levels for future residents of the proposed development. This report has been revised to reflect City of Ottawa Comments received on January 21, LOCATION The site is located along Greenfield Avenue, east of Main Street and north of Highway 417. The proposed site is illustrated in Figure 1. The proposed development consists of 6-bedroom suites on each floor including common living area. This report will focus on the rooms with exposure to Greenfield Avenue, Main Street and Highway 417. Surrounding land uses are as follows: north existing residential east existing residential south existing residential and Highway 417 west existing residential and commercial The main potential noise source that may impact the subject site is vehicular traffic and the volumes for these roadways are based on the City of Ottawa document Environmental Noise Control Guidelines. 1
5 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Noise Level Criteria February 8, 2016 Figure Greenfield Avenue Development 176 Greenfield Ave 2.0 NOISE LEVEL CRITERIA 2.1 GUIDELINES The Ontario Ministry of Environment (M.O.E.) has produced guidelines for noise levels for use in noise assessment and land use planning. Noise level criteria for residential land use are summarized in Table 1 below. Noise levels in excess of the guidelines presented are acceptable under certain conditions and with certain provisions. 2
6 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Noise Level Criteria February 8, 2016 Table 1 Noise Criteria for Residential Land Use Location 7 a.m p.m. 11 p.m. - 7 a.m. Outdoor Living Areas 55 dba N/A Indoor Living Areas 55 dba at plane of living room windows 50 dba at plane of bedroom windows Table 2 and Table 3 set out noise levels in excess of the criteria and the required provisions to allow residential activity in locations where noise level criteria are expected. Table 2 Combination of Road and Rail Noise Daytime Outdoor, Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements Location Outdoor Living Area Plane of Living Room Window Leq (16 hr) (dba) Leq16hr less than or equal to 55 dba Leq16hr greater than 55 dba to less than or equal to 60 dba Leq16hr greater than 60 dba Leq 16 hr less than or equal to 55 dba Greater than 55 dba to less than or equal to 65 dba Greater than 65 dba Ventilation Requirements Outdoor Control Measures Warning Clause N/A None required Not required N/A N/A Control measures (barriers) may not be required but should be considered Control measures (barriers) required to reduce the Leq to below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba as technically, economically and administratively feasible Required if resultant Leq exceeds 55 dba Type A Required if resultant Leq exceeds 55 dba Type B None required N/A Not required Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning Central air conditioning N/A N/A Required Type C Required Type D (Source: Ministry of the Environment, Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning: Requirements, Procedures and Implementation, October 1997) 3
7 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Noise Level Criteria February 8, 2016 Table 3 Combination of Road and Rail Noise, Night-Time Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements Location Plane of Bedroom Window Leq (8 hr) (dba) Greater than 50 dba to less or equal to 60 dba Ventilation Requirements Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning Warning Clause Required Type C Greater than 60 dba Central air conditioning Required Type D (Source: Ministry of the Environment, Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning: Requirements, Procedures and Implementation, October 1997) The M.O.E. also specifies building component requirements when indoor noise levels exceed the criteria by certain levels. These requirements are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 Road and Rail Noise Building Component Requirements Location Leq (16 hr) (dba) Building Component Requirements Plane of Living Room Window - Daytime Road Less than or equal to 65 dba Greater than 65 dba Rail Less than or equal to 60 dba Greater than 60 dba Building compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria Building compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria Location Leq (8 hr) (dba) Building Component Requirements Plane of Bedroom Window - Nighttime Road Less than or equal to 60 dba Greater than 60 dba Rail Less than or equal to 55 dba Greater than 55 dba Building compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria Building compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria (Source: Ministry of the Environment, Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning: Requirements, Procedures and Implementation, October 1997) 4
8 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Observations and Calculations February 8, OBSERVATIONS AND CALCULATIONS 3.1 NOISE LEVEL PREDICTIONS Noise predictions in this report were completed using the computerized version (STAMSON 5.03) of the M.O.E. noise model ORNAMENT to calculate noise levels from various sources. The program accepts variables related to noise sources and receivers, road traffic volumes, and the nature and extent of noise mitigation features, if required. 3.2 ROAD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic volume data for Greenfield Avenue, Main Street and Highway 417 were provided by the City of Ottawa document Environmental Noise Control Guidelines. The document indicates that the average annual daily traffic volume for Greenfield Avenue and Main Street will be 15,000 vehicles per day for a 2-lane urban arterial and Highway 417 will be 146,664 vehicles for an 8-lane highway. Additional information regarding applicable assumptions and ratios for day/night traffic and car/ truck traffic is summarized as follows: heavy truck traffic for this segment is estimated to be 5% of total traffic volume; medium truck traffic for this segment is estimated to be 7% of total traffic volume; the rest is assumed to be car traffic; daytime (7 am 11 pm) traffic is assumed to be 92%, with the remaining 8% at night (11 pm 7 am); and the speed limit for Greenfield Avenue and Main Street is 50 km/hr and Highway 417 is 100 km/h Table 5 and Table 6 summarize the traffic volumes used for calculations in this report. Table 5 Traffic Volumes Greenfield Avenue and Main Street, 2-Lane Urban Arterial Day Night Total Car 12,144 1,056 13,200 Medium Truck ,050 Heavy Truck TOTAL 13,800 1,200 15,000 Speed Limit 50 km/hr Gradient Approx. 1% Surface Asphalt 5
9 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Observations and Calculations February 8, 2016 Table 6 Traffic Volumes Highway 417, 8-Lane Highway Day Night Total Car 118,739 10, ,064 Medium Truck 9, ,266 Heavy Truck 6, ,333 TOTAL 134,931 11, ,664 Speed Limit 100 km/hr Gradient Approx. 5% Surface Note Asphalt 4.0m noise barrier provided along edge of roadway Housing row partially blocking basement to 2nd floor Approximate grade differential of 4.5m from receiver to roadway 3.3 PROJECTED NOISE LEVELS Using the M.O.E. noise model, ORNAMENT, noise levels were calculated for daytime conditions at the point representing the anticipated building location, based on the site plan prepared for TC United Group. The resulting receiver sites are illustrated in Figure 2 and Figure 3 and the noise clauses are illustrated in Figure 4 through Figure 6. The receiver heights for indoor, daytime, and nighttime noise level calculations for the proposed buildings were completed at the mid-height of each floor. To account for the distance from the receivers along Greenfield Avenue that were under 15 metres, the Ornament methodology outlined in Section 5.5 of the Ornament Technical Document was applied. This distance adjustment factor is based on a reference 15.0 m receiversource distance and applied to generate the Ornament output for typical receivers. While it was developed for distances between 15.0m and 500.0m, it is felt that it will closely approximate distances slightly below 15.0m. The adjustment factor will be added to the 15.0m noise level to increase the resultant noise level for mitigation purposes. The adjustment factor calculation if as follows: 6
10 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Observations and Calculations February 8, 2016 Table 7 Distance Adjustment Factor Equation : Ad = 10 (1 + α) log (Dref / D) α = 0.75 (1 heff / 25) Inputs: Dref = 15.0 D = 13.5 α = 0.66 heff basement = 3m α = 0.57 heff 1st = 5.94m α = 0.49 heff 2nd = 8.76m α = 0.40 heff 3rd = 11.58m Adjustment Factors Basement = 0.76 dba 1st Floor = 0.72 dba 2nd Floor = 0.68 dba 3rd Floor = 0.64 dba The unattenuated receiver noise levels have been summarized in Table 8 and noise level calculations are provided in Appendix A for daytime and nighttime building face noise levels and daytime outdoor noise levels. Table 8 Summary of Projected Unattenuated Noise Levels Receiver Site Location Daytime- Building Face (dba) Nighttime- Building Face (dba) Noise Clause Requirement R1 Basement Clause D R2 1 st Floor Clause D R3 2 nd Floor Clause D R4 3 rd Floor Clause D R5 Basement (rear) Clause C R6 1 st Floor (rear) Clause C R7 2 nd Floor (rear) Clause D R8 3 rd Floor (rear) Clause D R9 Outdoor Amenity Space Clause A Note: bold noise levels identify dba values exceeding MOE criteria 7
11
12
13
14
15
16 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Conclusions and Recommendations February 8, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 NOISE IMPACTS Predicted noise levels are above City of Ottawa and M.O.E. criteria at the daytime building face and the nighttime building face for potential units with exposure to Greenfield Avenue, Main Street and Highway 417. The following summarizes the measures required by the City of Ottawa and MOE criteria for the development to occur within accepted standards: Noise Warning Clause A is to be included in all offers of purchase and sale for the site due to the economic and technical feasibility of providing mitigation to Highway 417. Central air conditioning is to be installed in the building, inclusive of all floors. Noise Warning Clause D is to be included in all offers of purchase and sale of the building, inclusive of all floors. Noise warning clauses are provided in Appendix B. 4.2 INDOOR NOISE MITIGATION AIF METHOD For the floors and rooms requiring Noise Warning Clause D, the following building components will apply based on the Acoustical Insulation Factor (AIF) method, as per Environmental Noise Assessment in Land Use Planning Manual, The AIF value and minimum building component were based off the preliminary unit floor plans. The calculated noise levels requiring mitigation were 68.1 dba at the north side of the building during the daytime and 59.4 dba at the south side of the building during the nighttime. These noise levels were used to determine the typical building components required for the building façade. Table 9 summarizes the AIF values and minimum building components and Appendix C provides the floor plans and sample calculations. Table 9 AIF Summary Floor Room Wall AIF Value Type of Window Glazing Basement Type of Exterior Wall Unit 1 Living Area (6) 2 EW (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom n/a EW1 13
17 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Conclusions and Recommendations February 8, st & 2 nd Floor 3 rd Floor Unit 2 Living Area (13) 2 EW (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom n/a EW1 Unit 1 Living Area (22) 2 EW (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom n/a EW1 Unit 2 Living Area (13) 2 EW (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom n/a EW1 Unit 1 Living Area (22) 2 EW (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 3 *3 *26 2 (6) 2 EW (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 4 *3 *24 n/a EW1 Unit 2 Living Area (15) 2 EW n/a EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom n/a EW1 *3 *26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 4 *3 *26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Note: Wall 1 is closest in proximity to adjacent noise source As the noise levels exceed the MOE Criteria, building components include walls and windows are to be designed so the indoor sound levels comply with MOE noise criteria by using *EW1 as illustrated above. In this situation, double glazed windows with 2mm thickness and various spacing outlined above would be required the building. Windows with an equivalent AIF may be substituted for the recommended thickness, glazing and spacing. E.g. a double glazed 3mm pane with 6mm spacing may be substituted for double glazed 2mm panes with 15mm pacing. 14
18 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Conclusions and Recommendations February 8, 2016 *EW1 construction consists of: 12.7 mm gypsum board, vapour barrier, and 38x89 studs with 50 mm mineral wool or glass fibre batts in inner stud cavities. As well as sheathing and wood siding or metal siding and fibre backer board. Should the actual floor plans differ from the plans shown in Appendix C, updated calculations must be performed prior to the issuance of building permits. The inclusion of these measures will allow the residential development to proceed in accordance with MOE criteria with respect to environmental noise. Respectfully submitted by: Darren Scott, P.Eng., Project Manager Andrew Harte, P.Eng., Transportation Engineer 15
19 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix A Noise Level Calculations February 8, 2016 Appendix A NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS
20 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix A Noise Level Calculations February 8, 2016 A.1 INDOOR RECEIVER STAMSON REPORTS
21 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :14:22 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 1 - Indoor Basement Road data, segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Main (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Main (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg 6.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Greenfield (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Main (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Greenfield (night) ROAD ( ) = dba
22 Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Main (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :15:49 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 2 - Indoor 1st Floor Road data, segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 4.44 / 4.44 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Main (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00
23 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Main (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg 6.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 4.44 / 4.44 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Greenfield (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Main (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Greenfield (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Main (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 60.04
24 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :14:05 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 3 - Indoor 2nd Floor Road data, segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 7.26 / 7.26 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Main (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Main (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg 6.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 7.26 / 7.26 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Greenfield (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Main (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Greenfield (night) ROAD ( ) = dba
25 Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Main (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :16:23 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r4.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 4 - Indoor 3rd Floor Road data, segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Main (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00
26 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Main (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg 6.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Greenfield (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Main (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Greenfield (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Main (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 60.04
27 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :11:22 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r5.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 5 - Indoor Basement - Rear Road data, segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) Car traffic volume : /10325 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 9445/821 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 6747/587 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 5 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 1 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Elevation : 4.50 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 0.59! ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (night) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 0.59! ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 54.49
28 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :11:10 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r6.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 6 - Indoor 1st Floor - Rear Road data, segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) Car traffic volume : /10325 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 9445/821 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 6747/587 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 5 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 1 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 4.44 / 4.44 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Elevation : 4.50 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.44! 1.18! ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (night) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.44! 1.18! ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 56.48
29 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :09:25 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r7.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 7 - Indoor 2nd Floor - Rear Road data, segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) Car traffic volume : /10325 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 9445/821 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 6747/587 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 5 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 7.26 / 7.26 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Elevation : 4.50 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 7.26! 1.75! ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (night) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 7.26! 1.75! ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 58.54
30 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :10:22 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r8.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 8 - Indoor 3rd Floor - Rear Road data, segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) Car traffic volume : /10325 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 9445/821 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 6747/587 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 5 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Elevation : 4.50 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 10.08! 2.32! ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (night) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 10.08! 2.32! ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 60.70
31 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix A Noise Level Calculations February 8, 2016 A.2 OUTDOOR RECEIVER STAMSON REPORTS
32 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :20:33 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r9.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 9 - Outdoor Amenity Space Road data, segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) Car traffic volume : /10325 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 9445/821 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 6747/587 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 5 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 3.00 m Elevation : 4.50 m Barrier receiver distance : m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! -1.95! ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 59.56
33 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix B Noise Warning Clauses February 8, 2016 Appendix B NOISE WARNING CLAUSES
34 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix B Noise Warning Clauses February 8, 2016 WARNING CLAUSES The following warning clauses may be used individually or in combination: TYPE A: (Leq(16) in the OLA greater than 55 dba and less than or equal to 60 dba) Purchasers/tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic (rail traffic) (air traffic) may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the sound level limits of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment. TYPE B: (Leq(16) in the OLA greater than 60 dba) Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic (rail traffic) (air traffic) may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the sound level limits of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment. TYPE C: (Leq(16) in the OLA greater than 55 dba and less than or equal to 65 dba or (Leq(8) in the OLA greater than 50 dba and less than or equal to 60 dba) This dwelling unit has been designed with the provision for adding central air conditioning at the occupant s discretion. Installation of central air conditioning by the occupant in low and medium density developments will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the sound level limits of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment. TYPE D: (Leq(16) in the OLA greater than 65 dba or Leq(8) in the OLA greater than 60 dba) This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the sound level limits Source: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Noise Guideline Stationary and Transportation Sources Approval and Planning Publication NPC-300, Queen s Printer for Ontario, 2013
35 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix C AIF and Building Components February 8, 2016 Appendix C AIF AND BUILDING COMPONENTS
36
37
38 AIF Calculation and Selection of Components Project #: Greenfield Avenue - Basement Front Source: Road Traffic Predicted free-field day time sound level: Predicted free-field night time sound level: 68.4 dba 60.8 dba Table Sound level at building façade Day (Living Area) Night (Bedroom) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Source Shielding Correction Resultant Sound Le Table Number of Components Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Total Number of Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Components Unit 1 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 x x 2 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 x 1 Unit 2 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 2 Brdm 1 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 x 1 Note: Ignore if sound level below 55 dba Table AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm 1 23 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 20 Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm 1 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 20 Table Adjustment for Geometry Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Exposure Angle Adjustment Table Required AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm 1 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm 1 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 23 Table Component Area (ft 2 ) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Room Floor Area Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm Unit 2 Bdrm Note: TC United Group Layouts Table Component Percentages per Room Floor Area (%) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 1 Bdrm 2 75 Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm Unit 2 Bdrm Unit 2 Bdrm 3 89 Table Component Selection Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are 2 (6) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 EW1 Unit 2 Common Are 2 (13) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Brdm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 EW1 Note 1: Use Tables , "Topic 7, Enironmental Noise Assesment in Land Use Planning Manual" Note 2: Windows are based on 2 mm glass thickness (Double Glaze Windows) Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2/2/2016 Page 1
39 AIF Calculation and Selection of Components Project #: Greenfield Avenue - 1st / 2nd Floor Front Source: Road Traffic Predicted free-field day time sound level: Predicted free-field night time sound level: 68.3 dba 60.7 dba Table Sound level at building façade Day (Living Area) Night (Bedroom) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Source Shielding Correction Resultant Sound Le Table Number of Components Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Total Number of Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Components Unit 1 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 x x 2 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 x x 2 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 x 1 Unit 2 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 2 Brdm 1 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 x 3 Note: Ignore if sound level below 55 dba Table AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm 1 23 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 20 Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm 1 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 24 Table Adjustment for Geometry Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Exposure Angle Adjustment Table Required AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm 1 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 23 Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm 1 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 27 Table Component Area (ft 2 ) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Room Floor Area Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm Unit 2 Bdrm Unit 2 Bdrm Note: TC United Group Layouts Table Component Percentages per Room Floor Area (%) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 1 Bdrm 3 86 Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm Unit 2 Bdrm Unit 2 Bdrm 3 89 Table Component Selection Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are 2 (22) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 EW1 Unit 2 Common Are 2 (13) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Brdm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 EW1 Note 1: Use Tables , "Topic 7, Enironmental Noise Assesment in Land Use Planning Manual" Note 2: Windows are based on 2 mm glass thickness (Double Glaze Windows) Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2/2/2016 Page 2
40 AIF Calculation and Selection of Components Project #: Greenfield Avenue - 3rd Floor Front Source: Road Traffic Predicted free-field day time sound level: Predicted free-field night time sound level: 68.2 dba 60.6 dba Table Sound level at building façade Day (Living Area) Night (Bedroom) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Source Shielding Correction Resultant Sound Le Table Number of Components Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Total Number of Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Components Unit 1 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 x x 2 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 x x 2 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 x 1 Unit 2 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 2 Brdm 1 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 x 1 Note: Ignore if sound level below 55 dba Table AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm 1 23 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 23 Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm 1 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 20 Table Adjustment for Geometry Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Exposure Angle Adjustment Table Required AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm 1 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 26 Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm 1 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 23 Table Component Area (ft 2 ) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Room Floor Area Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm Unit 2 Bdrm Unit 2 Bdrm Note: TC United Group Layouts Table Component Percentages per Room Floor Area (%) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 1 Bdrm Unit 1 Bdrm 3 86 Unit 2 Common Are Unit 2 Brdm Unit 2 Bdrm Unit 2 Bdrm 3 89 Table Component Selection Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are 2 (22) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 EW1 Unit 2 Common Are 2 (15) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Brdm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 EW1 Note 1: Use Tables , "Topic 7, Enironmental Noise Assesment in Land Use Planning Manual" Note 2: Windows are based on 2 mm glass thickness (Double Glaze Windows) Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2/2/2016 Page 3
Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON
Noise Assessment Report 825-875 Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON Prepared for: 2536546 Ontario Inc. Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 100-300 Hagey Boulevard Waterloo, ON N2L 0A4 Project:
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT STONEPAY - PICKERING WEST OF BROCK ROAD AND SOUTH OF DERSAN STREET PART OF LOTS 19 AND 20, CONCESSION 3 PLAN 40R-28764 CITY OF PICKERING PREPARED FOR: STONEPAY 7603860 CANADA
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber ouse 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario Prepared for: City Park (Old Barber) omes Inc. 950 Nashville Road Kleinburg,
More informationNOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6
RESIDENTIAL / HOTEL DEVELOPMENT 141 GEORGE STREET / 325 DALHOUSIE STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6
More informationUAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD
UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD 23 Waterford Drive Telephone (613) 225-6362 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Facsimile (613) 225-3022 K2E 7V4 e-mail standen.ual@sympatico.ca website: http://www.urban-noise.ca 1.0 Background
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario Prepared for: Madison Brock Limited 369 Rimrock Road Toronto, Ontario M3J 3G2 Prepared by: Jingyi Guo Reviewed by:
More informationPlace Vanier Édifice AEFO
Place Vanier Édifice AEFO Martineau Architecture Inc. + Smith Carter Architects & Engineers Inc. TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT 250 Montreal Road Gradient Microclimate Engineering Inc. Prepared by Thomas Couper,
More informationSS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers
SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers REPORT NO. WA10-089 DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED 6-STOREY APARTMENT BUILDING 17, 19 & 23 ROBINSON AVENUE OTTAWA, ONTARIO SUBMITTED TO: ROBINSON PARK DEVELOPMENT
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD BETWEEN POPLAR AVENUE AND MAPLE AVENUE TOWN OF AJAX PREPARED FOR: TMIG February 2017 Y1610 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationAppendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment
Appendix K Environmental Noise Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT THORNTON ROAD NORTH TAUNTON ROAD WEST TO WINCHESTER ROAD WEST SCEDULE 'C' MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF OSHAWA
More informationACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Ottawa Ontario Canada ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CITY OF OTTAWA Prepared for Bryden Martel Architects Inc. Prepared by Hugh Williamson
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario Prepared for: Mattamy Homes Ltd. 433 Steeles Avenue East, Suite 110 Milton,
More informationEnvironmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East
Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East Novus Reference No. 16-0006 Version No. 1.1 (Final) February 26, 2016 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Specialist: Marcus Li, P.Eng. 16/02/26
More informationNoise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario Prepared for: New Horizon Development Group (Bronte) Inc. 69 John Street South, Suite 400 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B9 Prepared by Sheeba Paul,
More informationDraft Noise Abatement Guidelines
Document under Separate Cover refer to IMLC01-13 Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines April 2013 Legislative & Planning Services Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...1 1.1 Key Definitions...1 2.0 Existing
More informationEnvironmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON
Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON Novus Reference No. 12-0292C DRAFT (v2.2) February 7, 2014 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Specialist: Marcus Li, B.Sc., B.Eng.Sc.
More informationNoise Impact Assessment 1158 Second Line Road Ottawa, Ontario
Noise Impact Assessment 1158 Second Line Road Ottawa, Ontario Type of Document: Site Plan Submission Client: Theberge Homes Project Number: OTT-00245003-A0 Prepared By: M. Ghadban, EIT. Reviewed By: B.
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-srey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Miln, Ontario Prepared for: FGL Derry Inc. 5400 Yonge Street, Suite 300 Toron, Ontario M2N 5R5 Prepared by Vicr Garcia,
More informationRoad and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario
Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario For Attn: Nancy Shoemaker Black, Shoemaker, Robinson & Donaldson Limited 351 Speedvale Ave. West Guelph, Ontario N1H
More informationNoise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario
Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario Prepared for: Jennark Homes 66 Wellington Road 7, Unit #1 Elora, Ontario N0B 1S0 Prepared by Rajjot Arora, BASc
More informationRoad and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario
Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario Prepared for: Attn: Nancy Shoemaker Black, Shoemaker, Robinson & Donaldson Limited 351 Speedvale Ave. West Guelph,
More informationNOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO
NOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO Prepared for: State Building Group Attn.: John Guanti 27 Dufferin Street, Unit 34 Toronto, Ontario M6B 4J3 Prepared
More informationThe content of this supplement is based upon the that described in our letter of May 28, 2012.
September 20, 2012 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25 Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada L4B 1B9 email solutions@valcoustics.com web www.valcoustics.com telephone 905 764-5223 fax 905 764-6813 Davis Howe Partners
More informationPolicy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads
Lanark County Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads d r a f t f o r d i s c u s s i o n Prepared by: AECOM Canada Ltd. 302 1150 Morrison Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H
More informationFor The Regional Municipality of Waterloo 150 Frederick Street, 8 th Floor Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 4J3. Prepared by. Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng
Noise and Vibration Compatibility Feasibility Assessment Residential Component Proposed RMOW Transit Hub King Street West and Victoria Street North, Kitchener, ON For The Regional Municipality of Waterloo
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Mixed-Use Development 3385 Dundas Street West City of Toronto, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Mixed-Use Development 8 Dundas Street West City of Toronto, Ontario Prepared for: Terra Firma Homes Corp High Park Ave, Suite Toronto, Ontario M6P S7 Prepared by Rajjot
More informationMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION. Environmental Guide for Noise
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Version: October 2006 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Part of the Environmental Standards and Practices ISSUED BY: PROVINCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING OFFICE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationRail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario
Rail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario For Granite Holdings Ontario Limited 160 Southgate Drive Guelph, Ontario N1G
More informationBAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA
Charles M Salter Associates Inc BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS Prepared for: Kim Havens Wilson Meany Sullivan Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3330
More informationEnvironmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 939 Eglinton Avenue Development
Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 939 Eglinton Avenue Development Novus Reference No. 12-0253 Version No. 1.1 (DRAFT) May 1, 2015 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Scientist: Specialist: Project
More informationASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE
ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE Technical Report Prepared For Ardstone Capital Ltd. 48 Fitzwilliam Square Dublin Technical Report
More informationStationary Noise Assessment. Orléans Gardens. Ottawa, Ontario
Stationary Noise Assessment Orléans Gardens Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-053 Stationary Noise Prepared For: Prepared By: Michael Lafortune, Environmental Technologist Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Associate
More informationAssessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase
Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment - Draft Assessment - Draft Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 33-37 ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 33-37 ROL Phase
More informationAssessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase
Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment - Draft Assessment - Draft Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase A038_790147
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary January 2016 Visit us: Ottawa.ca/planning Contents Introduction 1 Implementation and Interpretation 1 Structure of the Environmental Noise
More informationPROPOSED CHILDCARE 11 CRYERS ROAD, HIGHBROOK ASSESSMENT OF NOISE
1/355 Manukau Road Epsom, Auckland 1023 PO Box 26283 Epsom, Auckland 1344 T: 09 638 8414 E: hegley@acoustics.co.nz PROPOSED CHILDCARE 11 CRYERS ROAD, HIGHBROOK ASSESSMENT OF NOISE Report No 16295 Prepared
More informationAttachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520
Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520 Prepared for: Prepared by: Jodi Ketelsen Michael A. Minor Date: November 4, 2012 Subject: Project: Noise Modeling Results: NE 51st Street to NE 65th Street
More informationFIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES
NOISE ELEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Noise Standards N1. To protect the citizens of Arroyo Grande from the harmful and annoying effects of exposure to excessive noise. Policy N1-1 The noise standards
More informationSection 1 OBC FADS /13 Access to Parking Areas
Section 1 OBC 3.8.2.2 4.3.12/13 Access to Parking Areas A barrier-free path of travel is provided from: a) the entrance to the exterior parking area b) at least one parking level where a passenger elevator
More informationCASE STUDY OF THE SOUND REDUCTION OF VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL GLAZING TREATMENTS
Abstract CASE STUDY OF THE SOUND REDUCTION OF VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL GLAZING TREATMENTS Greg Barry 1, Darren Jurevicius 2 and Matthew Stead 3 1 Resonate Acoustics, Adelaide SA 5082, Australia Email: greg.barry@resonateacoustics.com
More informationNOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Stantec Consulting Ltd. 300-675 Cochrane Drive West Tower Markham ON L3R 0B8 Tel: (905) 944-7777 Fax: (905) 474-9889 August 9, 2012 File: 160960699 NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario Prepared for: 8214221 Canada Inc. c/o LRL Associates Ltd. 1-2884 Chamerland Street Rockland, Ontario K4K 1M6 Prepared
More informationBRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS
BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS FROM NEW AND UPGRADED NUMBERED HIGHWAYS April, 2014 Prepared for; B.C. Ministry of Transportation
More informationNoise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation excavation
PROCEEDINGS of the 22 nd International Congress on Acoustics Challenges and Solutions in Acoustical Measurement and Design: Paper ICA2016-552 Noise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation
More informationMCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT
BKL CONSULTANTS LTD acoustics noise vibration MCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT PREPARED FOR: MAY 2016 REVISION 1 NOTICE BKL Consultants Ltd. (BKL) has prepared this report for the sole and exclusive benefit
More informationAcoustic Consulting Australia PtyLtd. I Consultants on Noise and Vibration P0 Box 332
Pg 'P. Acoustic Consulting Australia PtyLtd. I Consultants on Noise and Vibration P0 Box 332 Heidelberg i#i..wr. David, u.,0 Victoria 3054 Phone 0412 375 234 Email: acausteblgpond.corn ABN 49 095 932 092
More informationWhy does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location?
Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? Noise barriers generally prove to be quite effective in providing noise reduction at receptors near transportation facilities. In 1972, the U.S. Congress passed legislation
More informationEnvironmental Assessment May 2007
jurisdictional waters. It is assumed that, at a minimum, a USACE Section 404 Nationwide Permit would be necessary to construct these features. The impacts of the fill into the floodplain cannot be fully
More informationNoise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts
Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts Weixiong Wu a AKRF, Inc., 440 Park Avenue, 7th floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA. ABSTRACT Construction noise is one of the most disruptive noise sources
More informationH3. Residential Single House Zone
H3. Residential Single House Zone H3.1. Zone description The purpose of the Residential Single House Zone is to maintain and enhance the amenity values of established residential neighbourhoods in number
More informationNoise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California
Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California Prepared for The HR Group Architects 2277 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Studio 220 Sacramento, CA 95825 Prepared by Brian R. Smith, Principal INCE Board Certified
More informationConstructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook
Portland, Oregon NOISE-CON 2011 2011 July 25-27 Constructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook Joshua D Leasure JEAcoustics 1705 W Koenig Lane Austin,
More informationInstallation of a noise wall on Provincial land on the east side of Deerfoot Trail SE south of Highway 22X.
Chinook Roads Partnership Suite 100, 3131-114 Avenue SE Calgary, Alberta T2Z 3X2 March 5, 2012 Dear Home Owner(s), Re: Installation of a noise wall on Provincial land on the east side of Deerfoot Trail
More informationNoise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT
Noise Analysis Study along I - 29 Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT Meeting Format Very informal Meeting is not recorded General questions after presentations Specific questions
More informationMAY 4, Noise Barrier Presentation NE Quadrant Smith Avenue, Cherry Hill Circle NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.
MAY 4, 2011 Noise Barrier Presentation NE Quadrant Smith Avenue, Cherry Hill Circle 1 Introductions Agenda Overview of Interchange Project Overview of noise barrier process Fundamentals of sound & proposed
More informationBasement Renovation Guide For Residential Dwellings
1 Development Services Department Building Permit & Inspection Services Basement Renovation Guide For Residential Dwellings This document is a guide for home owners and does not cover all possible conditions.
More informationTraffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement
Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement NW Bethany Blvd Improvement Project Michael Minor, President Michael Minor & Associates Inc. Introduction to Acoustics What is Noise?
More informationPeak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.
3.11 NOISE Introduction This Noise section provides a discussion of applicable noise policies and standards, the results of ambient noise measurements, an evaluation of the projects compatibility with
More informationBuffer distances for surface roads and elevated highways correlated with pre-existing ambient noise
Buffer distances for surface s and elevated highways correlated with pre-existing ambient noise Jiping ZHANG 1 ;MarcBURET 2 ; Shuoxian WU 3 ;Yuezhe ZHAO 3 ; Saiyan SHEN 1 ;Xin ZHANG 1 1 Zhejiang Research
More informationH3 Residential Single House Zone
H3. Residential Single House Zone [ENV-2016-AKL-000243: K Vernon] Addition sought [CIV-2016-404-002333: Franco Belgiorno-Nettis]-Note: The properties affected by this appeal are identified on the Auckland
More informationH2. Residential Rural and Coastal Settlement Zone
H2. Residential Rural and Coastal Settlement Zone H2.1. Zone description The Residential Rural and Coastal Settlement Zone applies to rural and coastal settlements in a variety of environments including
More informationAppendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment
Appendix F Environmental Noise Assessment FINAL REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT TRENT RIVER CROSSING CAMPBELLFORD, ONTARIO Project Number: # W08-5292A June 3, 2009 SUBMITTED TO: Garry Pappin, B.E.S.,
More informationRural-Residential Rural-Residential Explanatory Statement Significant Issues Objectives and Policies...
Section Contents Rural-Residential... 2 16. Rural-Residential... 2 Explanatory Statement... 2 16.1 Significant Issues... 2 16.2 Objectives and Policies... 3 16.3 Activity Lists... 3 16.4 Activity Performance
More informationThe Homeowner s Building Application Checklist for Constructing a Residential Addition
The Homeowner s Building Application Checklist for Constructing a Residential Addition This checklist provides homeowners a summary of the Building Permit submission requirements for constructing a residential
More informationNYU Core: Post-EIS Façade Improvement Acoustical Assessment
NYU Core: Post-EIS Façade Improvement Acoustical Assessment Revised Version: September 24, 2012 Prepared by: AKRF, Inc. for New York University DRAFT FOR CLIENT REVIEW Table of Contents Introduction...
More informationStantec. Allenby Court Extension, Waterloo Noise Impact Assessment. Prepared for: BU Holdings Inc Ontario Limited Waterloo ON.
Allenby Court Extension, Waterloo Noise Impact Assessment Stantec Prepared for: BU Holdings Inc. 907248 Ontario Limited Waterloo ON Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 49 Frederick Street Kitchener ON
More informationGisborne District Council
11.0 NOISE AND VIBRATION... 1 11.1 STRUCTURE OF THIS CHAPTER... 1 11.2 INTRODUCTION... 1 11.3 ISSUES... 2 11.4 OBJECTIVES (NOISE INCLUDING VIBRATION)... 2 11.5 POLICIES (NOISE INCLUDING VIBRATION)... 2
More informationAPPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT
APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT Noise Study Technical Report Watertown South Connector US 81 to 29 th Street SE Watertown, South Dakota HDR Project No. 39319 Prepared by 6300 So. Old Village Place
More informationOne and Two Family Additions
One and Two Family Additions An addition to a house, duplex, garage, or an accessory structure requires a building permit prior to performing any construction. Building Department & Permit Office Mon-Fri
More information5 INFORMATION UPDATE TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT TESTON ROAD CITY OF VAUGHAN
Report No. 3 of the Transportation Services Committee Regional Council Meeting of March 24, 2011 5 INFORMATION UPDATE TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT TESTON ROAD CITY OF VAUGHAN The Transportation Services Committee
More informationAppendix D Environmental Noise Assessment
Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment AREAS 3 AND 4 SPECIFIC PLAN EIR NOISE AND VIBRATION ASSESSMENT NEWARK, CALIFORNIA January 30, 2009 Prepared for: Julie Mier David J. Powers and Associates, Inc.
More information9. NOISE AND VIBRATION
9. NOISE AND VIBRATION 9.1 Introduction 9.1.1 This Chapter details the existing baseline noise and vibration levels together with assessments of the suitability of the site for residential and commercial
More informationSTANDARDS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. (in the Low Density Residential zone)
STANDARDS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (in the Low Density Residential zone) Hauraki Section (not former Franklin Area) of Hauraki District Plan This pamphlet sets out the main performance standards
More informationCity of High Point Airport Overlay District Noise Level Reduction Design Standards
City of High Point Airport Overlay District Noise Level Reduction Design Standards Part A. Residential Design Standards for Zone 3 I. NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION (NLR) REQUIREMENT FOR ZONE 3. The City of High
More informationSECTION 7: INDUSTRIAL ZONE RULES
SECTION 7: INDUSTRIAL ZONE RULES 7.1 CATEGORIES OF ACTIVITIES 7.1.1 PERMITTED ACTIVITIES The following activities are permitted activities in the Industrial Zone, provided activities comply with all relevant
More information3.1 Noise Overlay District
3.1 A. Purpose The purpose of this District is to establish a Noise Overlay Zoning District within the. B. Special Definitions As used in this Article only, the following terms shall be defined as set
More informationNIGHTTIME ILLUMINATION
IV.A.3 NIGHTTIME ILLUMINATION 1. INTRODUCTION This section analyzes and discusses the extent to which the proposed project s artificial lighting would affect the visual environment of the project site
More informationNoise Study Bristol Park Redevelopment Area
Noise Study Bristol Park Redevelopment Area Distribution No. of Copies Sent To 3 Ms. Susan K. Jones Environmental Coordinator City of Champaign 102 N. Neil Street Champaign, IL 61820 X:\CH\IE\2013\13C018.00\10000
More informationTraffic Noise Analysis
Traffic Noise Analysis For Interstate 10: Las Cruces to Texas State Line AC-GRIP-010-2(108)144; CN G18A1 Submitted to: Taschek Environmental Consulting and New Mexico Department of Transportation Prepared
More informationDesign Guidelines. 1. INTRODUCTION 2. SECTION SPECIFICATIONS 3. HOUSE DESIGN RULES
Design Guidelines. 1. INTRODUCTION Waimakariri District Council (WDC) and Ravenswood Developments Ltd (Ravenswood) have in place a number of rules and covenants that effect the development of sections
More informationAPPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT
APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT 1) 9/25/06 Noise Study Technical Report; revised 05/08 2) 9/4/09 Memo Regarding Option 3 Noise Impacts to Pelican Lake Game Production Area Noise Study Technical
More informationRS-1 District Schedule
District Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is generally to maintain the single-family residential character of the District, but also to permit conditionally one-family dwellings with secondary
More informationDulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011
Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy February 2, 2011 as revised February 1, 2012 Table of Contents 1. Purpose... 1 2. Definitions... 1 3. Applicability... 5 4. Sound Fundamentals... 6 5. Highway
More informationAustralian Standard. Acoustics Road traffic noise intrusion Building siting and construction AS
AS 3671 1989 Australian Standard Acoustics Road traffic noise intrusion Building siting and construction This Australian Standard was prepared by Committee AV/5, Acoustics Community Noise. It was approved
More informationWILL THE REAL R-VALUE PLEASE STAND UP
WILL THE REAL R-VALUE PLEASE STAND UP Joe J. Johnson Department of Architecture University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon jjohnson@uoregon.edu ABSTRACT This paper describes an approach to determine actual R-
More informationCompatible Use Odour, Dust, and Noise Assessment
Compatible Use Odour, Dust, and Noise Assessment Northridge Property Management Inc. 1101 2nd Avenue East, Suite 200 P.O. Box 325, Owen Sound, Ontario, N4K 5P5 3195 East Bayshore Road, Owen Sound, Ontario
More informationUS 53 Noise Mitigation
US 53 Noise Mitigation 1 Meeting Agenda Introductions Brief Project Overview Terminology Agencies Involved Rules/Regulations Noise Characteristics Project Approach Mitigation Possible Noise Mitigation
More informationCOMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT
COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT Definitions Following is a list of commonly used terms and abbreviations that may be found within this element or when discussing the topic of noise. This is an abbreviated
More informationHAINE ROAD, RAMSGATE NOISE ASSESSMENT
PROJECT NAME CLIENT PROJECT RECORD HAINE ROAD, RAMSGATE ACTIVE LAND & BUILD LTD. REPORT DETAILS TYPE REFERENCE 1775\AR\12-2017\748 ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 2017 NICHOLAS JONES AUTHOR REVIEWER BEng(Hons) CEng
More informationWhat is Noise? In daily life, noise means unwanted sound.
NAME PIYUSH ZINZALA DHAVAL KARKAR JEEGAR VARIYA YASH BANKER CHINTAN BAROT ROLL NO. 14SA162 14SA122 14SA134 14SA180 14SA120 What is Noise? In daily life, noise means unwanted sound. As you have no doubt
More informationAppendix H. Millennium Hollywood Project Trip Cap and Mitigation Triggers
Appendix H Millennium Hollywood Project Trip Cap and Mitigation Triggers MILLENNIUM HOLLYWOOD PROJECT TRIP CAP AND MITIGATION TRIGGERS Crain and Associates Introduction The Millennium Hollywood Project
More informationAPPENDIX H COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS
APPENDIX H COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS July 27, 2010 Robert Hunton McCormick Rankin Corporation 1145 Hunt Club Road, Suite 300 Ottawa, Ontario K1V 0Y3 FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. Hunton,
More informationNoise Control Case Studies TIM WIENS CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
Noise Control Case Studies TIM WIENS CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES A bit about your speaker Presentation Overview 1. Some Case Studies 2. Mystery 3. Drama 4. Danger Environmental Noise Impact an Overview
More informationRS-2 District Schedule
District Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is primarily to maintain the single-family residential character of the District, but also to conditionally permit laneway houses and in some instances
More informationRailway noise mitigation factsheet 05: Cuttings and earth berms
Railway noise mitigation factsheet 05: Cuttings and earth berms 1.1 Overview In certain locations, the best option for the mitigation of railway noise may be to place the railway line low relative to the
More informationSPECIFICATION FOR NOISE MITIGATION
SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE MITIGATION 1. SCOPE This specification covers the design, construction, documentation and postconstruction review of state highway road-traffic noise mitigation. This specification
More informationEvaluating Appropriate Residential Ventilation Strategies in Dense Urban Environments and the Challenges for Passive Design
Evaluating Appropriate Residential Ventilation Strategies in Dense Urban Environments and the Challenges for Passive Design Ashley Bateson CEng CEnv MCIBSE MEI Partner, Hoare Lea Chair, CIBSE Homes for
More informationWINDOW AND DOOR REPLACEMENT SAMPLE PLAN
To aid in communication between yourself, the inspectors, and the plans examiners, we have prepared this sample plan to assist in the preparations of your plan for window and door replacement. Follow the
More information2016 MUTCD CONCEPT TTC COMMENTS. Michael A. Chacon Traffic Operations Division
2016 MUTCD CONCEPT TTC COMMENTS Michael A. Chacon Traffic Operations Division MUTCD 4 Ballot items were discussed at the June 2014 meeting in TTC, as well as additional topics. TTC No. 1 Pedestrian and
More information5.8 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE
5.8 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE 5.8.1 ZONE PURPOSE (1) Low density residential development areas are designed to satisfy a particular demand from people wishing to live in a semi-rural setting, but to
More information