UITP EU Committee Position on the ERA Draft Final Report. IU-ExtScope FinalReport. on the Extension of field of application of TSIs
|
|
- Lynette Hines
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Brussels, 22 April 2009 UITP EU Committee Position on the ERA Draft Final Report IU-ExtScope FinalReport dated 20th March 2009 on the Extension of field of application of TSIs The UITP European Union Committee, which brings together urban, suburban and regional public transport undertakings in the European Union has read with great interest the draft Final report dealing with the Extension of field of application of the Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs) dated 20th March With the letter sent to DG TREN on 19th January 2009, the UITP EU-Committee (together with the other sector organisations) has expressed its concern about this report : an approach in which only ERA and NSAs are involved in the drafting is unacceptable. In the end it is the rail sector that will be impacted and therefore the representative organisations of all market stakeholders have to be consulted before the finalisation of the document. In the following position, the UITP EU-Committee identifies a number of issues which require a clarification or some additions in the draft. GENERAL REMARKS 1. Status of the report The TSIs as published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) do not specify as clearly as the ERA draft report their current scope. The ERA report is the only place where a global vision of the TSIs content and evolution is provided. For this reason the future ERA report on TSI Application Guide should have a higher/stronger status than the TSIs from the legal point of view at EU level. The ERA TSI Application Guide, once approved by the RIS Committee, should be published in the OJ.
2 2. Scope of the Railway Legislation The European railway legislation has introduced many concepts which are not so clear and for which no definition has been provided. This creates many problems regarding the understanding of the scope of the various legal documents (directives, regulations, decisions ). Indeed, the purpose of the legislation is to establish the conditions to be met to achieve interoperability within the Community rail system, presented as a single system, as the use of the implies it. However, the Community rail system is not defined. The only definition of the rail system - coming from Article 2.0) of Interoperability Directive 2008/57/EC 1 - is self redundant: the existing rail system is made of lines and fixed installations of the existing rail system plus the vehicles travelling on that infrastructure! One can understand that the Community rail system is made according to Article 1.4 of the Interoperability Directive 2008/57/EC - of the whole rail system (existing rail system?), after Member states have excluded, by application of Article 2.2 of the Safety Directive 2004/49/EC and Article 1.3 of the Interoperability Directive 2008/57/EC, a number of systems, networks, infrastructure and vehicles, and even some railway undertakings operating solely on functionally separate networks [ ]. First, this shows that the Community rail system is not unique (there are other rail systems ). Second, it shows also that the scope of the TSIs cannot only refer to sub-systems or categories of lines, since some railway undertakings can be excluded. In addition, many technical requirements do apply only to railway undertakings 2, which means that non licensed undertakings operating railway services are not in the scope. The UITP EU-Committee therefore requests the introduction in the ERA report of the concept of the European (potentially) interoperable rail network. This network shall be defined by Member States thanks to a national map, showing for each country the borderline of the rail system potentially covered at least partially by the future TSIs. 3. Definition of international services The Passenger Right Regulation introduces the concept of urban, suburban and regional rail services. During the joint EC-ERA-UITP meeting held in UITP on 28 th January on the TSI scope extension, it has been clearly stated by the European Commission that when an urban, suburban and regional rail service is crossing a border, such a cross-border (local) service is not an international service. This sentence a cross-border (local) service is not regarded as an international service for the application of TSIs has to be included in the ERA report in order to clarify the TSI scope (and especially the TAP TSI one). 4. Categorisation of TSIs The imprecision in the meaning of the words leads to a confusion in the categorisation of TSIs. The categorisation should not refer mainly to categories of infrastructure, or of various 1 Article 2 o) existing rail system means the structure composed of lines and fixed installations of the existing rail system plus the vehicles of all categories and origin travelling on that infrastructure; 2 Article 2 k). railway undertaking. means any public or private undertaking, licensed according to applicable Community legislation, the principal business of which is to provide services for the transport of goods and/or passengers by rail with a requirement that the undertaking must ensure traction; this also includes undertakings which provide traction only; 2
3 structural and functional areas of sub-systems. It should give more importance to the categories subdividing the network of the Trans-European conventional rail system presented in Annex I, 1.1 of the Directive 2008/57/EC. These categories, even if they use the word lines do in fact refer to categories of long distance - rail services. On a given line or infrastructure may coexist different categories of international or domestic rail services. The first level of categorisation of TSIs should be made of categories of rail services (passenger services on a commercial basis, passenger services covered by PSR - see below remark 5.2 -, freight services). 5. Additional categories of rail services (or rail lines) One important rail services market segment is missing in the Safety and Interoperability Directives: that of urban, suburban and regional rail passenger services. This market of (local) rail services is made of two categories depending on the level of interoperability of infrastructure: they can be operated either on the Interoperable European Rail System (part of the Community rail system targeted by the TSIs) or they can be excluded from it by application of the Article 1.3 of the Directive 2008/57/EC. 5.1 Rail installations or undertakings potentially excluded in application of Article 1.3 of the Directive 2008/57/EC Systems, networks, infrastructure, vehicles and railway undertakings excluded by application of the Article 1.3 of the Directive 2008/57/EC are not in the scope of any TSI as they are not interoperable Local rail services potentially candidate for TSIs The local (suburban and regional) services which are potentially partly interoperable are also potentially (at least partly) covered by the TSI. However this category of local services (suburban and regional) which are operated under Public Service Requirements must be addressed separately in the extension of the scope of the TSIs. Indeed there are conventional rail rolling stock which are only used for suburban and regional services on a small territory (even cross-border)(e.g. Regio-Shuttles of the Ortenau-S-Bahn), and there are railway stations which are located on the European (potentially) interoperable railway system but which are only used for suburban and regional services, that is where no long distance train shall ever stop. A costly mandatory upgrade or over-specification applying through TSIs to these rolling stock and/or infrastructures may lead regional authorities in charge of financing suburban and regional services operated under Public Service Requirements in the frame of Regulation 1370/2007 and under Rail Passenger Rights Regulation 1371/2007- deciding to close such services and stations rather than accepting additional financial burden. In such a case, local rail services might be replaced by bus or coach services which have a lower level of service in many aspects. 3 See joint UITP-UNIFE position URBAN RAIL: TOWARDS A BETTER HARMONISED MARKET. November 2008 and further coordination with DG TREN for a specific approach of urban rail. 3
4 Most TSIs (for TAP TSIs, see below remark 7.3) should include a provision according to which rolling stock and infrastructures (and other relevant installations or equipment) only used for suburban and regional services operated under public service contracts on a small territory (even cross-border) may not need to apply all TSIs in the future, even when upgraded 4, provided that there is no negative impact on the functioning of long distance rail services. In case of application of TSIs to some local rail services (suburban and regional) which are operated under Public Service Requirements, this category of services must be addressed separately in the extension of the scope of the TSIs. They require performing relevant Cost Benefit Analysis. 6. Additional European Legislation influencing urban, suburban and regional rail services and additional actor ( Competent Authority ) The local (suburban and regional) services which are potentially partly interoperable are operated under Public Service Contracts. Therefore they have to cope with the PSR Regulation 1370/2007/EC, which involves an additional stakeholder in the overall technical framework: the Competent Authority, which is not a national body but a regional or local authority awarding a PSC (public service contract). This Regulation leaves the responsibility of the relationship to the Passenger to the Competent Authority financing the compensation for PSR services. This Competent Authority is very often also funding part or all of the rail infrastructure or of the fixed installations, and/or of the rail vehicles and of various equipment. On the other hand, the Directive 2007/58/EC on the market opening states in its Article 1.8 that cabotage rail services may be operated on international rail services, provided that they do not compromise the: economic equilibrium of a public service contract. Whether the economic equilibrium would be compromised shall be determined by the relevant regulatory body or bodies referred to in Article 30 of Directive 2001/14/EC on the basis of an objective economic analysis and based on predetermined criteria. It is necessary to mention this Directive as a reference document in the ERA report because consistency must be ensured between the predetermined criteria used in application of Directive 2007/58/EC and the criteria used in the Cost Benefit Analysis assessing the impact of the TSI scope extension in application of Directive 2008/57/EC. According to UITP EU Committee the ERA report must mention the Competent Authority in charge of rail services operated under Public Service Contracts as a specific actor. In addition, two important legislations (showing that this Competent Authority has to be considered) must be added in the Reference Documents (chapter 2, pages 13-14): the PSR Regulation 1370/2007/EC and the Directive 2007/58/EC. UITP EU Committee recalls that it had been requested to introduce in the economic evaluation methodology for TSI impact assessment the evaluation of the potential impact on Competent Authorities responsible for PSR services affected by the TSI scope extension. 4 See the position of the VDV, the German Association of Public Transport on the ERA draft report. 4
5 7. Scope of TAP TSIs 7.1. The scope of TAP TSIs is not the whole Community rail system As a consequence of the fact that some undertakings are not railway undertakings (since they do not have any license) and that some railway undertakings (with a license) can be exempted from the provisions of Article 1.3 of the Directive 2008/57/EC, the statement of the ERA report that the scope of TAP TSI is the whole Community rail system is wrong, even if the Community rail system is seen as the whole rail system : Contrary to what is written in ERA report on page 33, last sentence, the Passenger Rights Regulation 1371/2007/EC does not apply to all rail journeys in Europe. It does not apply to journeys travelled on undertakings which are not licensed. And it does not apply either to journeys travelled on services operated by railway undertakings that are exempted from the scope of the Interoperability Directive 2008/57/EC in application of Article 1.3 (b) or from the scope of the Rail Passenger Rights Regulation 1371/2007/EC in application of Article The scope of TAP TSIs is smaller than the one covered by the current draft ERA TAP TSI report IU-TAP TSI 0.8 The scope of Telematics Applications is restricted to the topics described in Annex II, 2.5 of the Directive 2008/57/EC 6. Therefore, taking TAP TSI draft report version 8 as a reference, UITP EU Committee is asking for transferring the basic parameters dealing with train paths (paragraphs to included and ) into a revised OPE TSI The scope of TAP TSIs must exclude local rail services operated under Public Service Contracts The TAP TSI are currently designed under the provisions of the Interoperability Directive 2008/57/EC, while this Directive must be applied without prejudice to the application of Regulation 1370/2007/EC on public passenger transport services by rail and by road 7 ( PSR regulation ) and of Regulation 1371/2007/EC on rail passengers rights and obligations ( RPR regulation ). They ignore the fact that suburban and regional rail services ( commuter services) are serving an extremely far larger amount of passengers than long distance rail services: the passengers on suburban and regional conventional rail services (metro and light rail not included) represent by far the biggest share of all heavy rail trips in Europe: they account for about 90% out of the total number of rail passengers and 50% of the total number of passenger x kilometers per year. 5 Article 1.5. With the exception of the provisions set out in paragraph 3 of this Article, a Member State may exempt from the application of the provisions of this Regulation urban, suburban and regional rail passenger services. In order to distinguish between urban, suburban and regional rail passenger services, Member States shall apply the definitions contained in Council Directive 91/440/EEC of 29 July 1991 on the development of the Community s railways Telematics applications In accordance with Annex I, this subsystem comprises two elements: (a) applications for passenger services, including systems providing passengers with information before and during the journey, reservation and payment systems, luggage management and management of connections between trains and with other modes of transport; (b) applications for freight services, including information systems (real-time monitoring of freight and trains), marshalling and allocation systems, reservation, payment and invoicing systems, management of connections with other modes of transport and production of electronic accompanying documents. 7 According to Regulation 1370/2007/EC on public passenger transport services by rail and by road (Recital 17), all what relates to social and quality standards for e.g. passenger rights and needs of persons with reduced mobility falls under the responsibility of competent authorities in charge of public transport services operated under public service contracts, in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity. Information services and ticketing services are part of social and quality specifications of public service contracts. 5
6 From the point of view of European local Public Transport operators, it is not acceptable to oblige - even in the future - the use of technical specifications designed for long distance rail passenger information and ticketing systems, as long as they do not fulfill the requirements and needs of local integrated systems (covering as well many other urban public transport services by bus, metro, light rail, ferries and so on). The information and ticketing systems used for suburban and regional rail services are answering fully different passenger needs and following totally different technical specifications, governed by the requirements of public service contracts which are only under the responsibility of local authorities according to the PSR regulation. Enforcing international specifications would be contrary both to the subsidiarity principle and to the needs of local passengers (including local passengers using local cross-border services). Local rail services operated under public service contracts, be there national or cross-border (see remark 4 above), are to be regarded as a permanent specific case excluded from the scope of the TAP TSI. 8. Complementary studies The ERA report proposes in chapter 13.2, page 52, to carry out several complementary studies. The UITP EU Committee requests that the draft final report of complementary studies are presented by ERA to the relevant rail associations for comments before their finalisation, and that these comments can be presented to the European Commission if deemed necessary. 9. Market growth It is written in Annex 4, chapter 5, , page 17, that: The statistics relating to rail transport show a very clear decline in market share over the long term, and this is a reason for a greater involvement of the European Commission. However, this sentence is not applicable to urban, suburban and regional rail passenger services. The local rail sector has faced a sharp increase in ridership in many places over the last decade. The aim of the EC to boost the long distance rail services should not be counter productive and TSI scope extension should not weaken the dynamism of the local rail sector by introducing unnecessary technical requirements and additional administrative burden. 10. Proposed timetable and options According to UITP EU Committee, the option 2 the inclusion of the requirements of spare parts cannot be developed under the ERA responsibility. It deals with matters falling under the responsibility of the standardisation bodies. Only option 1 can therefore be mentioned. 11. Future ERA Work Program As mentioned in the ERA report, it is clear that a huge amount of work shall be required for achieving the target of extending the scope of TSI and revising them. The UITP EU Committee highlights the great difficulty faced by the local rail sector for the following reasons: 6
7 Very large diversity of local situations, which make a synthetic approach very difficult; Scarcity of resources: most railway undertakings are facing budget restraints in terms of both human resources and availability of experts; Very sophisticated skill: TSI contents are very specific, and even on a limited issue very few experts have a visibility of the technical problems covering a large area, or even a country. Adopting a Europe wide perspective for the local rail sector cannot be achieved without a strong political and financial support of the Commission and of the Members States to this sector. At the same time it is crucial to increase the awareness of the Competent Authorities of the need of a clarification by the sector of what should be harmonised at EU level and what should stay developed at the local level (city, region or country) DETAILED REMARKS Page 4 CCS. The ERTMS specification will not be additionally changed : To be checked. Page 5 TAP. The TAP TSI is being drafted for the whole network : not acceptable, see above remark 7.1. Page 5. Other aspects to be taken into account. The sentence After the adoption [ ], nearly any railway project in the EU will have to be TSI compliant should be rephrased. Only new projects on European potentially interoperable rail system are at stake. Page 5. The extension of scope may have impact on new stakeholders not present in the 9 representative associations (e.g. railway undertakings and infrastructure managers which do not operate on TEN). The sentence into brackets may be true for freight but not as a general statement, since many of such RUs are directly members of UITP or indirectly through their national association which is a member of UITP. Page 6. Locomotives and passenger rolling stock. The content of the complementary study is not clear. Page 6. Telematic Applications for Passenger Services. Finalisation of the ongoing revision. How can a revision be put forward, as long as the TAP TSI have not yet been produced? Page 14. Reference documents. Two are missing: PSR Regulation 1370/2007/EC and Directive 2007/58/EC. See above remark 6. Page 17. Chapter 4. See above remarks 2, 3, 4 and 7. Page 17. Footnote 1 is unacceptable. See above remark 7. Page 18. Footnote 2 does not reflect all possible exclusions as from Article 1.3, dealing also with systems, networks and RUS, and not only with infrastructure and vehicles. 7
8 Page 18. Last sentence: replacing [ ] by Community rail system. The sentence has to be rephrased, since the installations etc. excluded by Article 1.3 cannot be in the scope. It is suggested to replace Community rail system by European potentially interoperable rail system. See also above remark 2. Page 25, paragraph Sentence beginning by The current draft. See above remarks 4 and 5. In addition, what is the meaning of light passenger trains? Page 27, paragraph This is not possible for the on board equipment. Full on-board equipment has to be installed regardless of the intended use of rolling stock. Isn t this sentence (which is doubtful) in contradiction with the sentence of page 28 At the extension [ ], new class B systems may appear? Page 29, paragraph First paragraph: Its is difficult [ ]. Normally, the same rolling stock operates on both TEN and non-ten lines. This statement is too general, and excludes the local rail specificities which shall have to be addressed in the TSI scope extension. Page 32, paragraph First sentence. What is a Commission Regulation? What is the difference with a Commission Decision? Why this sentence? What does it mean? Page 33, paragraph The second sentence is a wrong assessment, see above remark 7.1. TAP TSI must make a difference between services which might be excluded and those which cannot, and introduce a difference between services operated under public service contracts and other services. Page 34. First sentence should not be presented that way. The most important point is that Undertakings not licensed are not in the scope of Directive 2008/57/EC and therefore journeys travelled on such undertakings cannot be in the scope of TAP TSI. See above remark 7. Page 34. Second sentence ( The TSI prescribes [ ] ) is not applicable to undertakings which are not licensed. Even in the case of (licensed) RUs, PSR services require a specific approach, not limited to rail. The RU is not the main decision maker in the case of PSR services: they are under the responsibility of the Competent Authority which most often integrates passenger information and ticketing in an urban wide information and ticketing system covering all public transport services (including bus etc.), and which are therefore not rail specific. This information and ticketing system may be operated by a different entity than the public transport operators. Page 34. TAP TSI scope: see part of above remark 7.2 about OPE TSI. Page 34. TAP TSI Scope: see above remark 4. Page 35, paragraph , last paragraph. See above remark 8. Page 40, last paragraph: After the scope [ ]. The sentence needs clarification. Page 43, paragraph 9.2. What is written is incomplete as far as PSR services are concerned. See above remark 6. 8
9 Page 44, paragraph 9.5. The sentence is not fully right: some RUs are members of UITP. In addition one stakeholder should be mentioned as well and is strongly affected: the Competent Authority in charge of PSR services. Page 48, chapter 12, indent 2. Mapping is only necessary for the lines which are part of the European potentially interoperable rail system. It is not useful for what is excluded in application of Article 1.3 of Directive 2008/57/EC. Page 48, chapter 12, indent 4. The sentence in the middle of the paragraph needs to be clarified ( Cases where [ ] needs to be identified ). How to proceed for this identification? Who shall do it? Page 48, chapter 12. A sentence should be added recalling that the impact on the Competent Authority shall also be measured when PSR services are impacted. Page 50, table 7. Energy. Which are the 3 rd rail systems at stake? Page 50, table 7. Locomotives and passenger rolling stock. As for complementary study, see above remark 8. Page 51, table 7. TAP TSI. The sentence is a wrong assessment. See above remark 7.1. Page 51, last paragraph. See above remarks 4 and 5 and above remark 6 about Competent Authority. Page 52. See above remark 8 about complementary studies. In addition, see above remark 10 about options. Page 53. Footnote 4 must be deleted. See above remark 7. Page 55, table 10. Option 2 must be deleted, see above remark 10. Annex 4, chapter 4, 4.1.3, page 13. The regulations 1370/2007/EC, 1371/2007/EC and the directive 2007/58/EC should be added. See above remark 6. Annex 4, chapter 5, , page 17. See above remark 9. Annex 4, chapter 6, , page 25. ICs do not cover interchangeable parts, which depend upon standardisation bodies. Annex 4, chapter 8. See above remark 6 about the need for consistent evaluation criteria, and addition of Competent Authority as a stakeholder. See also above remark 11. 9
TAP TSI Update and Masterplanning. Brussels 26 January TAF/ TAP Masterplanning kick-off 1
TAP TSI Update and Masterplanning TAF/ TAP Masterplanning Kick-off Brussels TAF/ TAP Masterplanning kick-off 1 Contents 1. General update on TAP TSI 2. Overall TAP TSI masterplanning approach 3. Focus
More information(Text with EEA relevance)
L 356/438 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1305/2014 of 11 December 2014 on the technical specification for interoperability relating to the telematics applications for freight subsystem of the rail system
More informationDIRECTIVE 2012/34/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area (recast)
02012L0034 EN 24.12.2016 001.001 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER ON ACCESS TO SERVICE FACILITIES AND RAIL RELATED SERVICES
DISCUSSION PAPER ON ACCESS TO SERVICE FACILITIES AND RAIL RELATED SERVICES Disclaimer: This discussion paper does not prejudge the existing or future positions of the European Commission and its services
More informationTSI OPERATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT FINAL REPORT ON THE MERGING OF CONVENTIONAL RAIL AND HIGH SPEED TSIS
INTEROPERABILITY UNIT RATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT FINAL REPORT ON THE MERGING OF CONVENTIONAL RAIL AND HIGH SPEED TSIS Reference: ERA/CON/2011-02/INT Document type: Final report Version : 0.8 Date :
More informationThe European Framework for Vehicle Authorisation
The European Framework for Vehicle Authorisation Torben Holvad 13th Annual Fire Protection of Rolling Stock Conference, 1-2 nd March 2017, Berlin, Germany Content of presentation Brief background about
More informationA Digital Single European Railway Area. Kathrin Obst Unit B2-Single European Rail Area European Commission Directorate General Transport and Mobility
A Digital Single European Railway Area Kathrin Obst Unit B2-Single European Rail Area European Commission Directorate General Transport and Mobility Florence, 27 November 2015 Digital Single Market Digital
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER ON ACCESS TO SERVICE FACILITIES AND RAIL RELATED SERVICES. Article 1. Subject matter
DISCUSSION PAPER ON ACCESS TO SERVICE FACILITIES AND RAIL RELATED SERVICES Disclaimer: This discussion paper does not prejudge the existing or future positions of the European Commission and its services
More informationRailway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC & Role of European Railway Agency (ERA)
Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC & Role of European Railway Agency (ERA) Dragan JOVICIC Safety Assessment Sector (Safety Unit) Slide n 1 Content of the presentation 1. Role of European Railway Agency
More informationThe rail sector associations have jointly reflected upon the current framework within which safety and interoperability legislation is produced.
Mr Siim Kallas Vice President of the European Commission European Commission B 1049 Brussels Belgium Brussels, 11 March 2010 Dear Mr Vice President, The rail sector associations have jointly reflected
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid SA (2016/N) Czech Republic Individual subprograms for ensuring interoperability in railway transport
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 7.4.2017 C(2017) 2222 final PUBLIC VERSION This document is made available for information purposes only. Subject: State aid SA.44621 (2016/N) Czech Republic Individual subprograms
More informationTHE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM Guide for the application of the high-speed TSIs of Council Directive 96/48/EC
THE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM Guide for the application of the high-speed TSIs of Council Directive 96/48/EC THE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM Guide for the application of the high-speed
More informationRULES FOR REGISTRATION OF A VEHICLE KEEPER MARKING CODE (VKM)
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY (ERA) AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION FOR INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY RAIL (OTIF) RULES FOR REGISTRATION OF A References: ERA: IU-VKM-061128 OTIF: A 94-06/3.2006 Document type:
More informationDIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/798 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (recast) (OJ L 138, , p.
02016L0798 EN 26.05.2016 000.001 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions
More informationEUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY UNIT TECHNICAL OPINION ON GERMAN MINISTRY NOTIFICATION REF. 41351 REFERENCE: IU-WAG- TO3 DOCUMENT TYPE: TECHNICAL OPINION VERSION: 1.0 DATE: 19/10/2009 Edited by
More informationBoosting International Rail Freight. Sector Statement on Rail Freight Corridors
Boosting International Rail Freight Sector Statement on Rail Freight Corridors Brussels, 20 May 2016 1 Sector Statement on Rail Freight Corridors: Boosting International Rail Freight 20 May 2016 - final
More informationTSI OPERATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT, CONVENTIONAL RAIL SYSTEM FINAL REPORT ON THE REVISION
INTEROPERABILITY UNIT TSI OPERATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT, CONVENTIONAL RAIL SYSTEM FINAL REPORT ON THE REVISION Reference: IU-OPE_final report Document type: Final report Version : 1.5 Date : 06.05.2010
More informationThe Fourth Railway Package Completing the Single European Railway Area to foster European Competitiveness and Growth
The Fourth Railway Package Completing the Single European Railway Area to foster European Competitiveness and Growth Why do we need to act? Improve competitiveness of rail with other modes in order to
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Proposal for a Brussels, 13.12.2006 COM(2006) 783 final 2006/0273 (COD) DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the interoperability of the Community
More informationINTEROPERABILITY UNIT
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY UNIT TAF TSI - ANNEX A.5 :FIGURES AND SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS OF THE TAF TSI REFERENCE: ERA-TD-100 DOCUMENT TYPE: TECHNICAL DOCUMENT VERSION: 2.0 (DRAFT) TAF TSI DATE:
More informationThe Voice of European Railways POSITION PAPER
POSITION PAPER Commission proposal 2013/0297 (COD) amending Regulation EC 91/2003 of 16 December 2002 on rail transport statistics as regards the collection of data on goods, passenger, and accidents November
More informationGE/GN8640. Risk Evaluation and Assessment. Guidance on Planning an Application of the Common Safety Method on. Rail Industry Guidance Note
GN Published by: Block 2 Angel Square 1 Torrens Street London EC1V 1NY Copyright 2014 Rail Safety and Standards Board Limited GE/GN8640 Method on Risk Evaluation and Assessment Issue One; June 2014 Rail
More informationBenefits of harmonized regulations for placing in service of railway equipment - European experiences. Peter Mihm Head of Technical Cooperation
Benefits of harmonized regulations for placing in service of railway equipment - European experiences Peter Mihm Head of Technical Cooperation General presentation Railway Safety Interoperability ERTMS
More informationUncovering the technical specifications for interoperability as determined by the ERA to harmonise European safety standards
Uncovering the technical specifications for interoperability as determined by the ERA to harmonise European safety standards München, 12.09.2012, 4 th annual Fire Protection and Safety in Tunnels Content
More informationEuropean Railway Agency. Impact Assessment Report. Single Safety Certificate
Impact Assessment Report Reference: ERA/EE/xxxxx Document type: Draft Version : 0.3 Date : 21.12.2011 Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by Name T. Holvad K. Davies, L. McDaid, B. Accou, T. Breyne A. Magnien
More informationVehicle authorisation for broad gauge railways
Brussels, 21 December 2016 Vehicle authorisation for broad gauge railways 1 CER aisbl - COMMUNITY OF EUROPEAN RAILWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANIES Avenue des Arts 53-1000 Bruxelles T: +32 (0)2 213 08 70
More informationRADIO SPECTRUM COMMITTEE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Communications Networks Content & Technology Directorate-General Electronic Communications Networks & Services Spectrum Brussels, 23 November 2012 DG CONNECT/B4 RSCOM12-46 PUBLIC DOCUMENT
More informationEuropean Railway Agency SIAFI
European Railway Agency SIAFI 2007 23.04.2007 At the beginning Establishment of the Agency The first proposal for establishment of the European Railway Agency was made by the Commission on 23 January 2002
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU)
L 320/8 Official Journal of the European Union 17.11.2012 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1078/2012 of 16 November 2012 on a common safety method for monitoring to be applied by railway undertakings, infrastructure
More information(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVE 2014/55/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on electronic invoicing in public procurement
6.5.2014 L 133/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE 2014/55/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on electronic invoicing in public procurement (Text with EEA relevance)
More information15489/14 TA/il 1 DG E 2 A
Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 November 2014 (OR. en) Interinstitutional Files: 2013/0028 (COD) 2013/0029 (COD) 15489/14 TRANS 528 CODEC 2240 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council
More informationIntroduction. Public services in transport in EU and Central Europe
Introducing market forces in public services in transport in an enlarged Europe by Arthur Gleijm, NEA Transport research and training in the Netherlands Introduction Lack of market initiatives and entrepreneurship
More informationEUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 22 November 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0294 (COD) PE-CONS 42/13 TRANS 316 ECOFIN 533 ENV 546 RECH 265 CODEC 1403
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 22 November 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0294 (COD) PE-CONS 42/13 TRANS 316 ECOFIN 533 V 546 RECH 265 CODEC 1403 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject:
More informationImplementation of the Recast - Conditions of access to services Article 13 Recast Directive 2012/34/EU
Third Position Paper Brussels, 08 February 2017 Implementation of the Recast - Conditions of access to services Article 13 Recast Directive 2012/34/EU 1 CER aisbl - COMMUNITY OF EUROPEAN RAILWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE
More informationSTRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURES AND TRANSPORT PLAN PEIT. FIGURE 25. The rail network. Actions under the PEIT
PEIT 2005-Cap-06 8/3/06 13:29 Página 94 FIGURE 25. The rail network. Actions under the PEIT 94 PEIT 2005-Cap-06 8/3/06 13:29 Página 95 FIGURE 26. The rail network. The 2020 horizon 95 PEIT 2005-Cap-06
More informationRevision of the EU Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution
FEBRUARY 2013 Revision of the EU Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution UITP (Union Internationale des Transports Publics) is the international organisation of public transport, it is based in Brussels and
More informationAssurance provided by a second pair eyes (RASBO) of the correct Safe integration by the proposer of a new or modified Rolling Stock
Quality & Safety for Systems & Software Railway Engineering Assurance provided by a second pair eyes (RASBO) of the correct Safe integration by the proposer of a new or modified Rolling Stock Ir. Marc
More information11 th UIC Railway Noise Workshop
11 th UIC Railway Noise Workshop NOI TSI Revision Kamil Pravdík, Project Officer NOI TSI in general Directive (EU) 2016/797 (Interoperability Directive): technical specification for interoperability (TSI)
More informationGuide for the application of the INF TSI
European Railway Agency According to Framework Mandate C(2010)2576 final of 29/04/2010 Reference in ERA: ERA/GUI/07-2011/INT Version in ERA: 3.00 Date: 14 December 2015 Document elaborated by Document
More informationTAF TSI revision - recommendation Working Group on TELEMATICS in the transport of dangerous goods. Bordeaux,
TAF TSI revision - recommendation Working Group on TELEMATICS in the transport of dangerous goods Bordeaux, 03.06.2014 Directive 2008/57/EC says: Annex II - 2.5: Telematics Applications: TAF TSI Legal
More informationORR guidance on the application of the common safety method (CSM) on risk evaluation and assessment
ORR guidance on the application of the common safety method (CSM) on risk evaluation and assessment December 2012 1. 1 2. Second edition published by the Office of Rail Regulation, December 2012 This guidance
More informationInitiatives and actions for the promotion of sustainable urban mobility Development of the Legal framework for SUMPs
Initiatives and actions for the promotion of sustainable urban mobility Development of the Legal framework for SUMPs Head of Division of Sustainable Urban Mobility Directorate of Transport Development
More informationExplanatory document and suggestions for additions to the Explanatory Report
ORGANISATION INTERGOUVERNEMENTALE POUR LES TRANSPORTS INTERNATIONAUX FERROVIAIRES ZWISCHENSTAATLICHE ORGANISATION FÜR DEN INTERNATIONALEN EISENBAHNVERKEHR INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION FOR INTERNATIONAL
More informationANNEX XIV COMPETITION
27.10.2017 - EEA AGREEMENT - ANNEX XIV p. 1 ANNEX XIV COMPETITION TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Merger Control B. Vertical Agreements and Concerted Practices C. Technology Transfer Agreements D. Specialization
More informationFRAMEWORK BORDER-CROSSING AGREEMENT
ANNEX 4: FRAMEWORK BORDER-CROSSING AGREEMENT Framework Agreement between the Government of the Republic of XXX and the Government of the Republic of XXX on Border Dispatching for Rail Transport The Government
More informationCommission initiatives for a better railway in Europe
Commission initiatives for a better railway in Europe TRAKO Vision of the Railway 2020 Gdansk 25 September 2013 Dr. Gerhard Troche European Commission DG MOVE-B2 Single European Rail Area 1 Key challenges
More informationRSC-G-009-E Guideline for the Process of Authorisation for Placing in Service of Railway Sub Systems
RSC-G-009-E Guideline for the Process of Authorisation for Placing in Service of Railway Sub Systems Guidance for RSC Inspectors, Railway Undertakings/ Infrastructure Managers and Applicants for APIS Prepared
More informationSeparate NS for the border crossing zone?
Separate NS for the border crossing zone? 1 Podgorica 29. June 2017 Sabine Langer, legal and institutional expert Klaus Uhl, legal expert The Zone general principles of the model agreement For joint activities
More informationDIGITALISATION AND THE EU SINGLE TRANSPORT AREA : LEGAL PERSPECTIVES
DIGITALISATION AND THE EU SINGLE TRANSPORT AREA : LEGAL PERSPECTIVES Derkach Ella ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR Department of Business Law Donetsk National University Zagreb, Croatia 21-23 March 2016 Some transport
More informationA CER Statement on Brexit
Brussels, 13 October 2017 A CER Statement on Brexit 1 CER aisbl - COMMUNITY OF EUROPEAN RAILWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANIES Avenue des Arts, 53-1000 Bruxelles T: +32 (0)2 213 08 70 F: +32 (0)2 512 52
More informationRECOMMENDATION FOR USE RFU-CCS-077
Page 1 of 9 TITLE CERTIFICATES WITH RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE ORIGINATOR ALTRAN, CERTIFER, SINTEF, VŮŽ SUBJECT RELATED TO SUBSYSTEM CCO AND CCT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND EXPLANATION Introduction
More informationRailway interoperability. Academic perspective
Railway interoperability. Academic perspective Ernesto García Vadillo (Prof) Department of Mechanical Engineering University of The Basque Country (UPV/EHU) Brussels, 7th May 2013 1 Contents 1. Directive
More informationINTEROPERABILITY UNIT
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY UNIT TAF TSI - ANNEX D.2 : APPENDIX C - REFERENCE FILES REFERENCE: ERA-TD-103 DOCUMENT TYPE: TECHNICAL DOCUMENT VERSION: 2.0 (DRAFT) TAF TSI DATE: 17.10.2013 Page
More informationBiennial Report on the Progress with Railway Interoperability in the European Union
29 Biennial Report on the Progress with Railway Interoperability in the European Union Foreword This is the first report on the progress with railway interoperability in the European Union which the
More informationStrategic Direction for revised Locomotive and Passenger Rolling Stock (LOC&PAS) TSI. Issue 1.0
Strategic Direction for revised Locomotive and Passenger Rolling Stock (LOC&PAS) TSI Issue 1.0 Approved by the Industry Standards Coordination Committee 22 July 2011 ISCC/010 Copyright 2011 Rail Safety
More informationCEF Transport Info day 2016 Greece
Calls for proposal CEF-T 2016 CEF Transport Info day 2016 Greece Athens- 02 December 2016 Gaspare L'Episcopia- Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) Summary - - - - CEF Transport Priorities CEF
More informationThe next step in creating Electronicc Ticketing Interoperability for Europe
The next step in creating Electronicc Ticketing Interoperability for Europe Memorandumm of understanding This document presents a memorandum of understanding signed by ITSO, VDV KA, Calypso Networks, AFIMB
More informationPOSITION PAPER ON NOISE
INTRODUCTION The International Union of Wagon Keepers (UIP) recognises that noise is the most significant environmental burden of rail that affects not only society, but also the performance and perspectives
More informationDirective 96/48/EC - Interoperability of the trans- European high speed rail system
EN Directive 96/48/EC - Interoperability of the trans- European high speed rail system Technical Specification for Interoperability "Operations and traffic management" Sub-System - 1 / 155 - 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationConsultation on the draft of the limited revision of the TSI relating the subsystem rolling stock Noise (TSI Noise)
March 2018 Consultation on the draft of the limited revision of the TSI relating the subsystem rolling stock Noise (TSI Noise) Comments of Deutsche Bahn AG Deutsche Bahn AG Transport Policy Europe (IWE)
More informationP o s i t i o n P a p er
P o s i t i o n P a p er Transport Policy Full attainment of the European Railway Area Retaining flexible and economic solutions for the organisation, management und operation of railway services Official
More informationPromoting Digital Transport Wagon Keeper s View
Promoting Digital Transport Wagon Keeper s View 1 / Background Digital Agenda is number 2 of the top ten priorities of the Europe 2020 Strategy presented by the Juncker Commission. The Plan sets objectives
More informationEXCHANGE of FREIGHT WAGONS in EUROPE
UNESCAP EXPERT GROUP MEETING ON HARMONIZATION OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR FACILITATION OF INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY TRANSPORT EXCHANGE of FREIGHT WAGONS in EUROPE regarding AVV/CUU/GCU (former RIV) Jozef
More informationEuropean Data Economy
CER position Brussels, 26 April 2017 1 CER aisbl - COMMUNITY OF EUROPEAN RAILWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANIES Avenue des Arts, 53-1000 Bruxelles T: +32 (0)2 213 08 70 F: +32 (0)2 512 52 31 @CER_railways
More informationGuide for the application of the TSI for the Subsystems Control-Command and Signalling Track-side and On-board
CCS TSI Application Making the railway system work better for society. European Union Agency for Railways for the application of the TSI for the Subsystems Control-Command and Signalling Track-side and
More informationSIS Directory Accreditation number: SIS 0130
International standard: ISO/IEC 17020:2012 Swiss standard: SN EN ISO/IEC 17020:2012 SCONRAIL AG Zürcherstrasse 41 8400 Winterthur Head: Heiko Germroth Responsible for MS: Heiko Germroth Telephone: +41
More informationSTANDARDISATION MANDATE FORWARDED TO THE EUROPEAN STANDARDISATION BODIES IN THE FIELD OF ROAD TRANSPORT TELEMATICS
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL III INDUSTRY Legislation and standardisation; telematics networks Standardisation, including industrial aspects of electronic commerce Brussels, 24 April 1998 m2897r4e.doc
More informationProposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2017) XXX draft Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal market
More informationEu Public- Private Smart Move High Level Group
Eu Public- Private Smart Move High Level Group Final Recommendations Follow up to the European Commission Transport White Paper and contribution to the EU 2020 Growth Agenda European Union // Eu Public-Private
More informationNetwork Statement NETWORK STATEMENT. Annex A.1 Glossary. 1. Definitions. Applicant (article 3, 11 of the Rail Code)
NETWORK STATEMENT Annex A.1 Glossary 1. Definitions Applicant (article 3, 11 of the Rail Code) Area Asset Management -Infrabel Area Traffic Management & Services - Infrabel Auxiliary company of a railway
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22 January 2010 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER INTERPRETATIVE NOTE ON DIRECTIVE 2009/72/EC CONCERNING COMMON RULES FOR THE INTERNAL MARKET IN ELECTRICITY AND DIRECTIVE
More informationEuropean Railway Agency. Application Guide. Rue Marc Lefrancq, 120 BP F Valenciennes Cedex France Application guide Published
European Railway Agency Part 1 of the Reference Document envisaged by Article 27 of the Railway Interoperability Directive Application Guide Reference in ERA: ERA/GUI/XA Version in ERA: 3.0 Date: 30/10/2015
More informationDGE 2 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 21 March 2018 (OR. en) 2016/0149 (COD) PE-CONS 69/17
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 21 March 2018 (OR. en) 2016/0149 (COD) PE-CONS 69/17 POSTES 28 TELECOM 369 MI 974 COMPET 884 DIGIT 285 CONSOM 403 CODEC 2106 LEGISLATIVE ACTS
More informationDevelopment of urban public transport in Kazakhstan POLICY OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Development of urban public transport in Kazakhstan POLICY OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS CAST project chief technical advisor ALMATY 16 November 2017 Public Transport Improvement is not an option STUDY:
More informationCOMMISSION DELEGATED DIRECTIVE (EU).../ of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2015) XXX draft COMMISSION DELEGATED DIRECTIVE (EU).../ of XXX amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress, Annex IV to Directive 2011/65/EU of the
More informationECB-PUBLIC OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. of 4 October 2017
EN ECB-PUBLIC OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 4 October 2017 on a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 and Regulation (EU)
More informationTAP Phase One Masterplan Report
TAP Phase One Masterplan Report Release: 1.0 To DG MOVE, ERA, TAP Steering Committee Date: 13 May 2012 Author: Dr Christopher Querée Owner: TAP Phase One Project Team Client: DG MOVE, ERA Doc Ref: Masterplan
More informationTechnical document EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR RAILWAYS REQUIREMENTS FOR CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES SEEKING NOTIFICA TION
Assessment EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR RAILWAYS MNB - scheme 000MRA1O44 ver 1.1 Making the raflway system work better for society. F REQUIREMENTS FOR CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES SEEKING NOTIFICA TION Drafted
More informationGuidelines concerning Non-RU Applicants. Version 1.0
Guidelines concerning Non-RU Applicants Version 1.0 Version control VERSION AUTHOR DATE CHANGES 0.1 RNE Project Group 2014-11-12 Creation 0.2 RNE Project Group 2015-01-20 Addition of Section 8 0.3 RNE
More informationUNECE Workshop Role of freight forwarders and logistics in intermodal transport chains
UNECE secretariat document 26 March 2014 ENGLISH Original: ENGLISH AND FRENCH WORKING PARTY ON INTERMODAL TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS (WP.24) UNECE Workshop Role of freight forwarders and logistics in intermodal
More informationEUROPEAN SEA PORTS ORGANISATION ASBL/VZW ORGANISATION DES PORTS MARITIMES EUROPEENS ASBL/VZW
EUROPEAN SEA PORTS ORGANISATION ASBL/VZW ORGANISATION DES PORTS MARITIMES EUROPEENS ASBL/VZW European Commission Green Paper TEN-T: A policy review Towards a core and comprehensive network policy contribution
More informationTAF1(2004)02 18 January 2005 Page 1 of 18. CEN/ISSS Workshop TAF. Business Plan
18 Page 1 of 18 Business Plan CEN/ISSS Workshop Coding Structures in Support of Freight Telematics for Interoperability of the Trans-European Conventional Rail System 18 Page 2 of 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationIndependent Regulators Group Rail. IRG Rail
IRG-Rail (15) 6 Independent Regulators Group Rail IRG Rail Position Paper on the new proposals concerning governance and the award of public service contracts with a strong focus on the role of the regulatory
More informationCALL FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST FOR TWO POSTS OF SECONDED NATIONAL EXPERTS (SNE) AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A RESERVE LIST
CALL FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST FOR TWO POSTS OF SECONDED NATIONAL EXPERTS (SNE) AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A RESERVE LIST REF.: S2R.2018.01 Publication External Title of function Seconded National Experts (SNE)
More informationReport. Sectorial scheme for accreditation of notified bodies under Directive 2008/57/EC HARMONISED REQUIREMENTS
European Railway Agency Report Report Sectorial scheme for accreditation of notified bodies under Directive 2008/57/EC HARMONISED REQUIREMENTS Elaborated by Validated by Approved by Name Luca TRINCA, Irugo
More informationExecutive Summary. 1
Executive Summary In 2009 the EC published an Action Plan on Urban Mobility (APUM) with 20 concrete EU-level actions to be implemented by 2012. The EC announced that it would conduct a review on the implementation
More informationVehicle Registration, Marking and Numbering
Vehicle Registration, Marking and Synopsis This document sets out requirements for the registration, marking and numbering of rail vehicles operating on the Great Britain (GB) mainline network. Copyright
More informationCouncil Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies
Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies Official Journal L 225, 12/08/1998 P. 0016-0021 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN
More information(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
11.12.2010 Official Journal of the European Union L 327/13 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1169/2010 of 10 December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 29 May /1/07 REV 1
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 29 May 2007 9943/1/07 REV 1 TRANS 183 COMPET 159 ENV 284 ECO 77 ECOFIN 231 ENER 150 RELEX 383 RECH 150 EDUC 96 SOC 230 TELECOM 72 MI 136 IND 52 MAP 17 FISC 87 REPORT
More informationCommon Safety Targets and Common Safety Methods for the railway systems in Europe
Common Safety Targets and Common Safety Methods for the railway systems in Europe C.Cassir- ERA 4th session of WG «Standardised Risk Analysis» in Switzerland Bern- Page n 1 First, a few words on the ERA
More informationCOTIF in the framework of ESCAP. F. Davenne Bangkok September 2017
COTIF in the framework of ESCAP F. Davenne Bangkok September 2017 COTIF uniform railway law to connect Europe, Asia and Africa 2 1893 - first international Convention regarding international freight traffic
More informationProposal for the implementation of the authorised representative under Directive 2012/19/EU ( WEEE2 ) July 2013
Proposal for the implementation of the authorised representative under Directive 2012/19/EU ( WEEE2 ) July 2013 email: info@ewrn.org web: www.ewrn.org page 1 Content 1 Introduction...3 2 Target group...4
More informationITS Action Plan- Internet Consultation
ITS Action Plan- Internet Consultation * What are Intelligent transport Systems (ITS)? Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) are generally defined as a collection of applications and services based on advanced
More information2682eng. Dear Correspondents,
Unfiled Notes Page 1 30. mars 2011 07:56 Subject From Erik Røsæg To 'nifs rr@jus.uio.no' Sent 30. mars 2011 07:55 Attachments 2682eng Dear Correspondents, After the last round of correspondence in the
More informationFSM. Full Service Model Initiative 1. Latest developement. Brussels. 4 June Full Service Model Initiative. Advisors
FSM Full Service Model Initiative Full Service Model Initiative Latest developement Brussels 16 June 2014 Advisors Full Service Model Initiative 1 Comparing multi-carrier distribution between air and rail
More informationThe General Secretariat has made the editorial changes necessary to align the text with the rules on references to Union legislation.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 October 2014 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0157 (COD) 14652/14 TRANS 487 MAR 162 FIN 775 CODEC 2075 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS From: General Secretariat
More informationCommon approach for supervising the railway safety performance
Computers in Railways X 147 Common approach for supervising the railway safety performance E. M. El Koursi 1 & L. Tordai 2 1 INRETS-ESTAS, Villeneuve d'ascq, France 2 UIC, France Abstract The key aspect
More information2015 CEF Transport Calls
2015 CEF Transport Calls CEF Transport Flemish Info Day 02 December 2015 Isabelle Maës (DG MOVE) & Julien Tami (INEA) Content 1. Structure of the call 2. Application and Evaluation process 3. Innovation
More informationEBA/RTS/2017/ December Final Report. Draft regulatory technical standards. on central contact points under Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2)
EBA/RTS/2017/09 11 December 2017 Final Report Draft regulatory technical standards on central contact points under Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2) FINAL REPORT ON CENTRAL CONTACT POINTS UNDER THE PSD2
More information