Ricky Eaton Intervention Manager 21 years in Subsea Operations and Well-Control Equipment

Transcription

1 25 Years In Well-Control and Rig Equipment Inspection Registered on ISN Net World and PEC Premier OHSAS 18001: 2007 ISO 9001: 2008 IADC Accredited Training Center Ricky Eaton Intervention Manager 21 years in Subsea Operations and Well-Control Equipment

2 Kickoff meeting and contents Agenda Safety evaluation of onsite personnel and equipment Intervention well-control equipment from a regulatory standpoint Equipment Pedigree Theoretical Shear Calculations The Letter 2

3 Kick Kick Off Meeting Off Meeting Understanding the third-party verification process. Narrow the gray areas with a frozen scope of work. Critical components documentation and traceability review. Incidents of Non-Compliance (INC) prevention. Performance Improvement Plans (PINC) prevention. Preventive maintenance and Repair history. A equipment checklist philosophy will stay efficient alongside onsite systems testing. Shearables.

4 Onsite Safety Evaluation We use a safety checklist in the evaluation process. Job Safety Analysis (JSA) Proper testing equipment Ensure safety barriers Personnel competency 4

5 Intervention Well-Control Equipment from a Regulation Standpoint Subsea Intervention Units in retrospect are considered BOPs per 0-cfr (e). These units are reviewed in accordance with the rig-based BOP regulations as much as possible. The following documentation is being required by BSEE and pertains to the thirdparty verification process: Third-Party Shearing Verification Independent Third-Party Verification 5 5

6 Critical Components Checklist The components identified throughout this process intended to control or regulate the movement of wellbore fluids are considered critical. The third-party verification process for Intervention well-control is driven by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Not opinions. An experienced independent third-party technical team uses practical methodology. Any well-control verification process should be designed for the equipment being used and to work efficiently with the onsite systems test procedures

7 Equipment Pedigree Importance What of is documentation pedigree Indicates the equipment has been properly designed and constructed. Validates Non Destructive Examinations (NDEs) and major inspections. Tracks modifications and current drawings. Documents the integrity of the equipment. 7

8 Equipment Pedigree Onboard Documentation Copies of the manufacturer s equipment data book and third-party certification shall be available for review. Equipment records such as API manufacturing documentation (COCs), NACE certification, and factory acceptance testing reports will be available onsite. Maintenance and repair historical files shall be maintained by serial number and stay with the equipment at all times. 8

9 Equipment Pedigree Preventive Maintenance (PM) Planned maintenance is much more cost efficient than unplanned maintenance. PM programs are audited through the independent third-party verification process and considered critical. Intervention systems will meet or exceed OEM recommendations. Maintenance documents should be maintained on file, at the rig. 9

10 Equipment Pedigree Insufficient Equipment Documentation Experience has shown that equipment often has insufficient documentation. This results in a significant scope of work to verify compliance. We start with the PM program to see how the equipment is maintained. Building a pedigree through existing documentation. 10

11 Pressure Containing Components Serial Number Data Dashboard S/N Last NDE/UT Verified Major PSL Inspecti? Inspectio on Date Yes / No n COC Date COC comments and location. Maintenan ce Rated Document Working ation Pressure Review Date Last Docume nted FAT Date Data Book PM Program k Lubricator Ball Valve End Cap, 7 5/8 Thor Box, Collar Flange (2) Seat End Cap Retaining Ring (2) 5.00 Bore Ball Modification #10262 Rev. C Main Housing, 15k Open Water Lubricator Valve Cage Nut End Cap, W/ 7 5/8 Thor Pin Thor Pin S-seal Ball Half Cage Upper Mandrel Isolation Ring Ball Rotation Boot (2) Replacement Cage End Cap Lower Mandrel Lower Mandrel, Isolation Ring Stop BPTH Yes /2/ /2/2 Yes Yes 1 W001 (Top) W002(Botto Yes m) ENG89-0 /W004 Yes /1/2 Yes /1/1 Yes W001 Yes SLX222F1 P Yes /2/1 Yes /12/ Yes /1/ /1/1 Yes /7/1 Yes ENG W001 W002 Yes Yes Jul-14 7/1/20 8/16/2 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/20 7/25/2 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/20 9/12/2 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/ /11/ 2006 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable Jul-14 7/1/20 9/22/2 Recertification July 15k Yes /15/201 4 (RRE) Acceptable Jul-14 7/1/20 9/0/2 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/20 1/1/2 Recertification July 5/15/201 6/21/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 008 7/1/20 /2/2 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/20 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/20 7/11/2 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/20 9/1/20 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/20 2/12/2 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/20 /220 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/20 8/20/2 Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 7/1/20 11/12/ Recertification July 5/15/ (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable 11

12 Independent Third-Party Theoretical Shear Verification Equipment Intervention Well-control OEM Ram/Valve Model Size and Pressure Rating Shear Operator/Booster/Bonnet Ram Design Shearables Pipe/Coil Tubing/Wireline Wall Thickness [in] Pipe Grade Yield Strength Water Depth 12

13 Regulatory Standpoint Independent Third-Party Verification Letters 4 types of independent third-party letters Full condition independent third-party verification letter o Complete systems audit and document review. Independent third-party verification follow-up letter o Confirming nothing has been compromised since last service. 1

14 Regulatory Standpoint Independent Third-Party Letters Statement of Fact (SOF) o Revisions to operations, procedures or equipment to keep working. Wet Verification Letters o Well hops 14

15 Regulatory Standpoint Operations Wet Verifications Since the Wet Verification testing was conducted subsea, rather than on the stump, this is a more realistic demonstration of the intervention well-control system ability to work as intended if called upon during a well-control event. 15

16 At The End of The Day The well-control equipment will operate as originally designed. Any modifications or upgrades to the equipment conducted after delivery has not compromised the design or operations of the system. The equipment is designed for the specific equipment on the rig and for the specific well design. The equipment has not been compromised or damaged from the previous service. The IWC equipment will operate in the conditions in which it will be used. 16

17 Contact Information Ricky Eaton