Pilot Accounts for Germany Policy implications

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Pilot Accounts for Germany Policy implications"

Transcription

1 Pilot Accounts for Germany Policy implications Paper presented at the UNITE Dissemination Seminar 21, Paris Heike Link (DIW Berlin) 1 What are the UNITE pilot accounts? 2 A few methodological remarks 3 Results for Germany How to use and interpret the pilot accounts? Full report: Link et al. (21) The Pilot Accounts for Germany and Switzerland. Deliverable 5 of the UNITE project funded under the 5th Transport RTD Programme of the EU. Berlin.

2 1 What are the pilot accounts?! Quantitative comparison of total (average) social and revenues (taxes, charges) of transport modes on a national level! Strategic/monitoring instrument regarding the development of, financial taxes balance, level and structure of prices! Empirical basis for in-depth policy analysis rather than for immediate price setting policy

3 General design of the accounts Costs Supplier operating (External) Environmental Air pollution Global warming Noise Congestion (delay ) (Internal) Revenues (D irectly related to a specific cost category) Charges for infrastructure use Subsidies for concessionary fares U ser tariffs (O ther transport specific revenues) Annual circulation tax Fuel tax Eco tax VAT Subsidies Loss of revenues due to tax exemptions/reductions Non transport related revenues

4 The modes, networks, transport means and user groups breakdown - Germany Transport modes Road Network & institutional differentiation Motorways Other federal roads Other roads R ail N ational rail (D B ) Other rail (non-db) Other public transport Aviation Inland waterway shipping Maritime shipping Airports Air transport Inland waterways Inland waterway harbours Seaports Means & user breakdown Motorcycles Passenger cars Light goods vehicles Heavy goods vehicles Rigid Non-rigid Special & agricultural vehicles Passenger transport Regional Long-distance Freight transport Tram, metro, trolley buses

5 2 A few methodological remarks! The cost estimation for the UNITE accounts has used the best methodologies and data currently available! Basic methodologies include findings from: DIW infrastructure cost methodology (capital stock model) ExternE (impact pathway approach, EcoSense model, air quality model, exposure-response functions) INFRAS/IWW 2 state of the art estimates on VOT s, Risk values, etc.

6 3 Results for Germany

7 7 Aggregated road account for Germany mill. - 6 Total Revenues 5 Direct allocatable Other Variable Risk value 1 Fixed Noise Global warming External Air pollution Environmental Congestion Internal Other environmental charges Fuel tax Vehicle tax Eco taxes

8 Aggregated rail account - DB for Germany mill Total Revenues 12 Direct allocatable Other Stations Tracks 2 operating Supplier External Environm ental Internal Congestion Other environmental charges Tariff revenues Fare Subsidies Fuel tax Eco taxes Environmental : Noise Air pollution Global warming

9 Aggregated account for tram, metro and bus operators Germany mill Total Revenues Capital only 2 1 n.a. n.a. Supplier operating External Environmental Internal Congestion charges Tariff revenues Fare Subsidies

10 Aggregated Aviation account for Germany mill. - 4 Total Revenues Air pollution 5 External Global warming Environmental Congestion Internal Other environmental Airport revenues ATM charges MET charges

11 14 12 Aggregated Inland Waterways account for Germany mill. - Total Revenues Global warming Air pollution External Environmental Internal Other environmental Infrastructur charges

12 4 How to use and interpret the pilot accounts? First best pricing rules refer to marginal cost pricing " What is than the rule of the UNITE pilot accounts? 1) Equity Dimensions of equity Use of the (German) pilot accounts Modes $ Individual transport users User groups defined by income classes Vehicle classes (HGV versus passenger cars) Country $ Area of future development # Contribution to the policy discussion on the level of HGV charging in Germany $

13 2) Efficiency: Cost recovery as a binding constraint " second best pricing rules require:! knowledge on total to be covered! Monitoring to avoid overcharging! Information on fixed to indicate if subsidies for fixed are worthwhile # Contribution to the debate on rail track access charges of German rail 3) Financial viability: (if cost recovery is binding)! Knowledge on total to be covered is essential for regulators (rail!) and governments.! Knowledge on deficit occurring with marginal cost pricing is essential for subsidy negotiations! # Contribution to the debate on rail track access charges of German rail