Pasco County MPO: Congestion Management Process PROCEDURES HANDBOOK

Transcription

1 : Congestion Management Process PROCEDURES HANDBOOK Final: March 2016

2

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES HANDBOOK OVERVIEW... i Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION Causes of Congestion Federal Requirements Chapter 2: CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW Eight-Step Process CMP in Metropolitan Planning Process CMP Coordination with Local Government Capital Programs Public Involvement Process CMP Actions/Recommendations Chapter 3: CMP GOALS AND OBJECTIVES CMP Goals and Objectives Chapter 4: NETWORK IDENTIFICAION Area of Application Transportation Network Chapter 5: DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Performance Measures Relationship of Performance Measures to the Goals and Objectives Chapter 6: SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MONITORING PLAN Chapter 7: CONGESTED CORRIDOR SELECTION AND CMP STRATEGIES Implementation Congested Corridor Selection and Project Selection Process Toolbox of Strategies CMP Safety Mitigation Matrix Project and Program Identification Methodology for Establishing Multimodal Priorities CMP Implementation Process Methodology for Setting Priorities Chapter 8: MONITOR STRATEGY EFFECTIVENESS February 2016

4 LIST OF TABLES Table 5-1 Relationship of Goals and Objectives to Performance Measures Table 6-1 System Performance Monitoring Plan LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Causes of Congestion Figure 2-1 Federal Eight-Step Congestion Management Process Figure 7-1 CMP Project Prioritization Overview Figure 7-2 CMP Prioritization Process LIST OF MAPS Map 4-1 Area of Application & Road Network APPENDICES: Appendix A: Pasco County CMP Strategy Solutions Matrix... A-1 Appendix B: Pasco County CMP Safety Solutions Matrix... B-1 Appendix C: Pasco County CMP Toolbox of Strategies... C-1 February 2016

5 OVERVIEW CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS PROCEDURES HANDBOOK The is required by the federal government to implement a CMP as part of their routine planning efforts. This handbook outlines the procedures that will ensure that the federal requirements are followed. Specific performance evaluation information on the Pasco County network is included in the accompanying State of the System Report (SOSR). The SOSR also identifies congested corridors along with specific recommend improvements and projects that can be implemented in helping to relieve congestion. This handbook is outlined to follow the eight step Congestion Management Process (based on federal guidelines). The main purpose of this handbook is to (1) evaluate the transportation system and monitor progress, (2) identify congested corridors and select corridors for evaluation, (3) evaluate corridors and potential strategies, and (4) prioritize and program improvements. The report chapters found in this handbook are described in more detail below: Chapter 1, Introduction In this chapter, the purpose of the Congestion Management Process (based on federal requirements), an introduction to the causes of congestion, and an overview of the handbook are provided. Chapter 2, Congestion Management Process Overview The eight step Congestion Management Process is described in Chapter 2 and a general overview of the process is provided as well as the update schedule for the State of the System Report. Chapter 3, Goals and Objectives The remainder of the chapters in this handbook discuss specific steps from the eight step Congestion Management Process. The Goals and Objectives of the CMP are provided. Chapter 4, Network Identification includes a description of the area of application and the transportation network used for the CMP process. Chapter 5, Development of Performance Measures A brief summary is provided in Chapter 5 of the congestion related measures that used for monitor the effectiveness of the CMP. Chapter 6, System Performance Monitoring Plan This chapter describes how the transportation system is evaluated and monitored, the identification of congested corridors and selection of corridors for evaluation. Chapter 7, Congested Corridor Selection and CMP Strategies This chapter describes how congested corridors were identified and the strategies which can be used to reduce congestion on the selected corridors. Chapter 8, Monitor Strategy Effectiveness This chapter describes monitoring of strategies that have been implemented as well as the performance measures that are used in the State of the System Report for system-wide monitoring of transportation trends. i February 2016

6 (This page intentionally left blank) ii February 2016

7 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION The Congestion Management Process (CMP) is a management system and process conducted by a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to improve traffic operations and safety through the use of either strategies that reduce travel demand or the implementation of operational improvements. As an MPO, the is required by the federal government to implement a CMP as part of their routine planning efforts. The public benefits from having a functional CMP in place since it can often improve travel conditions through the use of low-cost improvements or strategies that can be implemented in a relatively short timeframe (within five to ten years) compared to more traditional capacity improvements such as adding additional travel lanes which can take over ten years to implement and cost significantly more. Projects identified through the CMP process may also be added to future updates of the Long Range Transportation Plan should they require a longer time timeframe to implement. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) defines the CMP as a systematic approach collaboratively developed and implemented throughout a metropolitan region, that provides for the safe and effective management and operation of new and existing transportation facilities through the use of demand reduction and operational management strategies. The CMP is required to be developed and implemented as an essential part of the metropolitan planning process in Transportation Management Areas (TMAs). TMAs are defined as urbanized areas with a population over 200,000, or any area where designation as a TMA has been requested. This establishes the requirement for the to implement a CMP. The Congestion Management Process (CMP) has evolved from what was previously known as the Congestion Management System (CMS) or in the case of the Pasco MPO, the Mobility Management Process (MMS). The previous CMS/MMS process was documented in a prior report. The primary changes included in this updated CMP include the identification of revised Goals and Objectives for the CMP and the development of a matrix of CMP related strategies that would typically be considered when evaluating corridors. The implemented its first MMS in the mid 1990 s. The purpose of this Procedures Handbook is to document the CMP process. It is envisioned that this report will be updated with each Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) cycle. Accompanying this handbook will be the CMP State of the System Report, which summarizes the performance of the existing transportation system as well as a comparison to prior year performance, identifies congested corridors, and may recommend specific improvements. 1-1 February 2016

8 CAUSES OF CONGESTION The process of congestion management begins by understanding the causes of the problem. Figure 1-1 shows the results of a national study presented by FHWA on the sources of congestion. Six major causes of congestion are identified: Bottlenecks - points where the roadway narrows or regular traffic demands (typically at traffic signals) cause traffic to back up; these are the largest source of congestion and typically cause a roadway to operate below its adopted level of service standards. Traffic incidents - crashes, stalled vehicles, debris on the road; these incidents cause about one quarter of congestion problems. The focus of the Pasco CMP will be the reduction of crashes that can cause congestion and expediting incident response to clear incidents where Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) surveillance is in place. Work zones - for new road building and maintenance activities like filling potholes; caused by necessary activities, but the amount of congestion caused by these actions can be reduced by a variety of strategies. Bad weather - cannot be controlled, but travelers can be notified of the potential for increased congestion and signal systems can adapt to improve safety. Poor traffic signal timing - the faulty operation of traffic signals or green/red lights where the time allocation for a road does not match the volume on that road; poor signal timings are a source of congestion on major and minor streets. Special events - cause spikes in traffic volumes and changes in traffic patterns; these irregularities either cause delay on days, times, or locations where there usually is none or add to regular congestion problems. Figure 1-1 Causes of Congestion As shown in Figure 1-1, bottlenecks are the largest cause of congestion nationally, followed by traffic incidents and bad weather. Bad weather cannot be controlled, but policies and improvements can be implemented to control traffic incidents and bottlenecks. This national data are widely used in CMP updates due to the lack of comprehensive local studies on the causes of congestion. The data suggest that local causes are likely to be similar, with bottlenecks and traffic incidents typically being the top two causes of congestion. Bottlenecks 40% Special Events 5% Source: FHWA Poor Signal Timing 5% Traffic Incidents 25% Bad Weather 15% Work Zones 10% 1-2 February 2016

9 FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS The initial federal requirements for congestion management were introduced by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 and were continued under the successor law, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21). The Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), passed into law in August The requirements were further evolved under Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) signed into law on July 6, One of the significant changes included in the federal surface transportation program, SAFETEA- LU, was the update requirement for a congestion management process in TMAs, as opposed to a congestion management system. According to FHWA, the change in name is intended to be a substantive change in perspective and practice to address congestion management through a process that provides for effective management and operations, an enhanced linkage to the planning process based on cooperatively developed travel demand reduction and operational management strategies, as well as capacity increases. CMP in Transportation Management Areas (Section ) - Statewide Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning; Final Rule a) The transportation planning process in a TMA shall address congestion management through a process that provides for safe and effective integrated management and operation of the multimodal transportation system. Cooperatively developed and implemented Travel reduction strategies Operational management strategies b) The CMP should result in multimodal system performance measures and strategies. Acceptable levels of service may vary from area to area Consider strategies that: I. Manage demand II. Reduce single occupant vehicle travel III. Improve transportation system management and operations Where general purpose lanes are determined to be appropriate, must give explicit consideration to features that facilitate future demand management strategies. c) The CMP shall be developed, established, and implemented in coordination with Transportation Systems Management (TSM) and operations activities. The CMP shall include: Methods to monitor and evaluate the performance of the multimodal transportation system 1-3 February 2016

10 I. Identify the causes of congestion II. Identify and evaluate alternative strategies III. Provide information supporting the implementation of actions Definitions of congestion management objectives and appropriate performance measures to assess the extent of congestion and support the evaluation of the effectiveness of strategies. Performance measures should be tailored to the specific needs of an area. Establishment of a coordinated program for data collection and system performance monitoring to define the extent and duration of congestion. To the extent possible, this program should be coordinated with existing sources. Identification and evaluation of the anticipated performance and expected benefits of congestion management strategies that will contribute to the more effective use and improved safety of the existing and future transportation system. Examples of strategies to consider include: I. Demand management measures, including growth management and congestion pricing II. Traffic operational improvements III. Public transit improvements IV. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) V. Where necessary, additional system capacity Identification of an implementation schedule, implementation responsibilities, and possible funding sources for each strategy Implementation of a process for periodic assessment of the effectiveness of implemented strategies. Results of this assessment shall be provided to decision makers and the public to provide guidance on the selection of effective strategies for future implementation. d) TMA designated nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide may not program federal funds for any project that will result in a significant increase in the carrying capacity of single occupant vehicles (SOVs), with the exception of safety improvements or the elimination of bottlenecks (within the limits of the appropriate projects that can be implemented). 1-4 February 2016

11 e) In TMAs designated nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide, the CMP shall provide an appropriate analysis of reasonable (including multimodal) travel demand reduction and operational management strategies for a corridor in which a project with a significant increase in SOV capacity is proposed to move forward with federal funds. f) State laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to congestion management systems or programs may constitute the congestion management process, if FHWA and FTA find that these are consistent with the intent of this process. 1-5 February 2016

12 (This page intentionally left blank) 1-6 February 2016

13 CHAPTER TWO CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW Maintenance of a CMP is a requirement for all Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) under Florida law and for MPOs in TMAs under Federal law. Consistent with the guidance from the Final Rule on the CMP for Transportation Management Areas (Section ), as presented earlier in this report, the intent of the CMP Update is to address congestion management through a process that provides for safe and effective integrated management and operation of the multimodal transportation system. EIGHT-STEP PROCESS Under the original federal guidelines, the CMS was described as a seven step process. With the addition of a recent, new first step, the CMS has evolved into a Congestion Management Process or CMP, an eight-step process, as summarized below. 1. Develop Congestion Management Goals and Objectives Goals and Objectives should be identified that help to accomplish the congestion management goals (Addressed in Chapter 3). 2. Identify Area of Application The CMP must cover a well-defined application area (Addressed in Chapter 4). 3. Define System/Network of Interest The CMP must define the transportation network that will be evaluated (Addressed in Chapter 4). 4. Develop Performance Measures The CMP must define the measures by which it will monitor and measure congestion (Addressed in Chapter 5). 5. Institute System Performance Monitoring Plan There must be a regularly-scheduled performance monitoring plan for assessing the state of the transportation network and evaluating the status of congestion (Addressed in Chapter 6). 6. Identify Congestion/Evaluate Strategies There must be a toolbox for selecting congestion mitigation strategies and evaluating potential benefits. Congested locations are also identified in this step of the Pasco CMP (Addressed in Chapter 7). 7. Implement Selected Strategies/Manage System There must be a plan for implementing the CMP as part of the regional transportation planning process (Addressed in Chapter 7). 8. Monitor Strategy Effectiveness The strategies must be regularly monitored to gauge the effectiveness (Addressed in Chapter 8). 2-1 February 2016

14 Figure 2-1 illustrates the federal eight-step congestion management process. Each step of the congestion management process is covered in specific detail throughout the remaining chapters of this handbook. As identified above, specific chapters cover each of the eight steps. Also, the flowchart describes the planning activity where each step is addressed. For example, Steps 1 4 are typically only updated four to five years with the LRTP Update whereas other steps are updated more regularly. In addition, Figure 7-1 displays more details on the specific CMP process that the is using. 2-2 February 2016

15 Congestion Management Process Figure 2-1 Federal Eight-Step Congestion Management Process The CMP Procedures Handbook outlines all eight steps of the federal process and primarily addresses Steps 1-4, while the State of the System Report primarily covers Steps February 2016

16 CMP IN METROPOLITAN PLANNING PROCESS The CMP is a working tool that needs to be effectively integrated into the MPO s project prioritization process, Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), and Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The objectives-driven, performance-based CMP starts with the monitoring and evaluation of current conditions to identify where congestion exists. Based on the identified goals and objectives and the established performance measures of the CMP, this evaluation leads to the identification of potential mitigation strategies, implementation of appropriate strategies and the development of a monitoring plan. The outputs of the CMP, such as identified congested corridors/locations and their recommended mitigation measures then proceed through the CMP process where they are evaluated and projects or programs are selected for implementation. The projects or programs that are identified for implementation through the CMP are then moved into project development and programmed into the TIP for funding and implementation. The implemented projects are then monitored to evaluate the strategy effectiveness on a system-wide basis. In Pasco County, CMP projects are typically funded using boxed funds identified in the LRTP along with other local revenues. This allows the MPO to annually add the most important strategies for implementation and expand funding levels to address local needs. CMP COORDINATION WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL PROGRAMS Within the requirements of the CMP Process, the Pasco MPO has found an opportunity to utilize the congested corridors information to better inform the capital programming of projects conducted annually by all the local governments within Pasco County. By providing this level of coordination between the two processes, the desired outcome is to implement operational and system improvements through the local government capital programs to address congestion without the immediate addition of travel lanes. The cost of providing transportation solutions can be decreased by utilizing the corridor strategies included later in this report instead of always adding new lanes. As documented further in the remainder of this section, this coordination occurs at two distinct times during the year. During the development of the initial Level of Service (LOS) reports in March, information is provided as an input to the project identification for the drafting of the Capital Improvement Program. Later in the year when the final LOS reports are produced, information is exchanged with the local government staff for purposes of identifying longer term projects to address congestion through the Capital Improvements Element update. Developed as part of the State of the System Report, the strategies for addressing the congestion issues would be proposed for the identified priority corridors. Step 6 as mentioned in the CMP Actions/Recommendations section would be the point where information on long-term recommendations would be made available for local government use. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS The purpose of the CMP public involvement activities is to provide the public with information on 2-4 February 2016

17 congestion monitoring activities that are in place in Pasco County at this time and planned improvements to mitigate congestion. Significant progress has been made in Pasco County toward identifying congested corridors and alternative transportation improvement strategies to alleviate congestion and enhance the mobility of persons and goods. As recent federal regulations warrant involvement of the public during all key stages of transportation projects, it is important to involve the public in all key stages of transportation improvement projects within and beyond the CMP. Otherwise, lack of public support and awareness may adversely impact the success of any potential transportation project. Therefore, the proposed CMP improvement projects/strategies will be presented to the citizens of Pasco County at various public involvement activities. The CMP public involvement process includes various activities to inform public and gather input, and is integrated with the LRTP public involvement activities conducted throughout the LRTP planning process. The key elements of the LRTP public involvement process include: meetings with the Congestion Management Process Task Force (CMP Task Force) meetings with the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings with the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) meetings with the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) coordination with Freight Goods Movement Stakeholders presentations to MPO Board information dissemination through various MPO public involvement opportunities such as postings to the website and newsletters The MPO s CMP Task Force serves as the advisory group for the CMP update. The list below reflects the member jurisdictions/agencies in the Task Force. Pasco County Dade City City of New Port Richey City of Port Richey City of Zephyrhills Pasco County Public Transit Florida DOT District 7 Pasco County School Board Other stakeholders may be included on the Task Force as the need merits such as CSX Railroad, goods movement representatives, community traffic safety teams (CTST), etc. Typically these additional members would serve on an ad hoc basis to address specific issues. 2-5 February 2016

18 The Pasco County CMP Task Force typically convenes as the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for the MPO. This ensures that CMP related issues are routinely addressed as an ongoing activity of the MPO. A key contribution of the Pasco County CMP Task Force is to identify, track, and evaluate potential congestion or safety related issues on the roadway network. The MPO has a long history of using a spreadsheet to track issues identified and the status and responsible party for resolving these issues as well as identifying potential projects/solutions. This has been a beneficial activity and will remain a part of the Pasco CMP. This will allow congestion and safety issues to be identified and addressed which may not be otherwise identified through the formal screening process used by the CMP. CMP ACTIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS A list of recommendations and actions is presented to enhance the congestion management process and become more efficient in the overall MPO planning process. The actions/recommendations presented below will be reviewed and considered by MPO staff and the Pasco County Congestion Management Process Task Force for implementation as necessary. Update the CMP Procedures Handbook (CMP Steps 1 to 4) on a four to five-year cycle consistent with the update cycle of the LRTP. It is anticipated that the LRTP update cycle will go to a four-year cycle in anticipation of the non-attainment status for air quality. Timing of the completion of CMP updates in advance of finalizing the LRTP updates would benefit integration of CMP strategies into the LRTP. Additional updates may occur on a more frequent basis as a result of changes in federal rules or local regulations. Develop a State of the System Report that documents the current conditions of the transportation system through the use of performance measures, tracks the effectiveness of previously implemented strategies, to the extent possible, and evaluates trends and conditions for the multi-modal transportation system in the CMP study area. The State of the System Report will include steps 5 through 8 of the CMP which includes: o Step 5: Performance Monitoring o Step 6: Identify Congestion and Evaluate Strategies o Step 7: Implement Selected Strategies o Step 8: Monitor Strategy Effectiveness (Combined with Step 5) Implementation of the selected strategies may include programming in a local government s Capital Improvements Program, identification of corridor studies to be done through the MPO s Unified Planning Work Program, or longer term projects that would be included in the local government s Capital Improvements Element or the MPO s Long Range Transportation Plan. Enhance coordination with agencies participating in the CMP by framing desirable strategy types and defining roles in implementation. This is essential, as most congestion and mobility strategies are formulated and implemented by other agencies. 2-6 February 2016

19 Projects from the CMP process may identify projects for inclusion in the LRTP either through the routine LRTP update cycle or through plan amendments. Identify opportunities to incorporate real time travel data to determine a Travel Time Index (TTI) or other reliability measures when addressing congestion. Incorporate a Duration of Congestion (DOC) analysis for estimating the severity of congestion in terms of number of hours for consideration in prioritizing future projects. Identify and implement data collection recommendations on collecting key congestion data as well as closing any data gaps identified in this CMP. Perform outreach and education efforts to inform interested parties and stakeholders. These may include: o Maintain a CMP Website on the MPO Website. o Develop a brochure and/or newsletter on the CMP and its benefits. Continue monitoring changes to federal CMP regulations and modify/update CMP to reflect new requirements. The general schedule for the development of the State of the System Report is provided below. This is a flexible schedule that can be changed from year to year as circumstances dictate. (For example, certain congested corridors may be identified one year, but these corridors may not be further evaluated if improvements are already identified in the CIP.) This schedule includes opportunities for coordinating the results of the federally required CMP with the local government process used in developing the annual Capital Improvements Program (CIP) and the annual update of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Comprehensive Plan. o January to May Update of roadway inventory data to support LOS analysis. Calculation of Non-Highway System wide Performance Monitoring (Public Transportation, Bicycle, Pedestrian, TDM, etc.). Produce growth rates on county roadways using county traffic counts to perform initial LOS analysis (existing conditions +1 year and existing + 5 years)*. Produce preliminary growth rates on state roadways using older state traffic counts to perform initial LOS analysis (existing conditions and existing + 5 years)*. Provide initial LOS analysis for identifying congested corridors used to prioritize projects for funding. This analysis includes a combination of volumes based on growth rates and scheduled improvements to the transportation system. Existing volumes on existing network 2-7 February 2016

20 Existing volumes + 1 year s growth on existing network with 5 years of committed projects. Existing volumes + 1 year s growth on existing network with 15 years of committed projects. Existing volumes + 5 years of growth on existing network with 5 years of committed projects. Existing volumes + 5 years of growth on existing network with 15 years of committed projects. o o o o o May CMP Task Force meeting to review and identify potential operational issues that would not be identified through the technical screening process. Coordinate with goods movement stakeholders and providers to identify related needs (Note: May occur earlier). May to June Receive FDOT traffic counts. Produce updated growth rates on state roadways using state traffic counts and revise initial LOS analysis (produced earlier in the year) based on the results of the LOS analysis. Screen corridors Select corridors for evaluation. July Report to CMP Task Force and CAC the results of the corridor screening and selection. Report to the CMP Task Force and CAC the results from the Non-Highway System wide Performance Monitoring (Public Transportation, Bicycle, Pedestrian, TDM, etc.). July to August Identify strategies to be considered on selected corridors. Evaluate strategies where appropriate and make improvement or program recommendations for implementation. Report to the CMP Task Force and CAC the recommended strategies for implementation. Develop priority list of CMP recommendations for adoption by the MPO Board. September Finalize technical recommendations on strategy implementation. Program improvement recommendations in the appropriate local government CIE and identify other priority projects or programs for the TIP. Finalize performance monitoring summary. 2-8 February 2016

21 Obtain endorsement from the CMP Task Force and CAC on the programmed projects in the CIE and priority projects or programs for the TIP. Adopt the CMP Project Priority List for use in developing the TIP during a Public Hearing of the MPO Board. o October to November Finalize the CMP State of the System Report. *Note: Since FDOT state roadway traffic counts for the prior are typically released in May or June of the following year, it is necessary to use preliminary state traffic count data that is a year older for the preliminary analysis. Once the FDOT state roadway traffic count data is provided, growth rates and their associated traffic volumes are used to update the LOS analysis. 2-9 February 2016

22 (This page intentionally left blank) 2-10 February 2016

23 CHAPTER THREE CMP GOALS AND OBJECTIVES A series of CMP goals and objectives are developed to guide the process of monitoring congestion and improving the mobility of persons and goods in Pasco County. These were compiled based on CMP goals and objectives used by other communities in Florida and other states that would also be appropriate for Pasco County. The goals and objectives are presented below. These CMP goals and objectives will be used as a tool for selecting strategies and performance measures for strategy monitoring and evaluation. The CMP goals and objectives are consistent with the Long Range Plan goals and will be evaluated with each update to the CMP. CMP GOALS AND OBJECTIVES GOAL #1: Integrate the Congestion Management Process and its proposed improvements into the Long Range Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program and help guide Land-use Policies and Land Development Regulations Objective 1.1 Objective 1.2 Incorporate projects identified through the CMP in the Five-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Develop land-use policies and land development regulations that support public transit, ridesharing, walking, and bicycling, especially for travel to work. GOAL #2: Develop, maintain, and expand bicycle, pedestrian, and multiuse path facilities for efficient and safe movement of people. Objective 2.1 Objective 2.2 Coordinate transit services with bicycle, pedestrian, and multiuse path improvement projects. Provide for pedestrian, multiuse path, transit, and bicycle facilities to encourage employees to use these facilities to get to work. 3-1 February 2016

24 GOAL #3: Improve and increase transit as a viable transportation alternative. Objective 3.1 Objective 3.2 Objective 3.3 Objective 3.4 Improve transit service in congested corridors by increasing service in congested corridors with existing service and implementing service in congested corridors currently not served by transit. Develop multimodal strategies that reduce dependency on the single occupant vehicle (SOV). Establish park-and-ride facilities and provide transit connections to park-and-ride facilities and carpool lots. Increase efficiency of transit system through the use of appropriate new and advanced technologies that are feasible. GOAL #4: Identify and implement strategies to mitigate congestion and improve the safety and mobility of people and goods and maintain the region s air quality Objective 4.1 Objective 4.2 Objective 4.3 Objective 4.4 Identify and implement congestion management strategies to enhance the existing transportation system and relieve congestion, improve safety, and improve mobility of persons and goods, where large capital improvements may not be necessary. Encourage using demand management and/or operations management strategies to solve congestion problems before adding capacity through general purpose lanes or new roadways where these strategies may eliminate the need to construct additional lanes. Increase the efficiency of the transportation system through the use of low-cost Transportation Demand Management (TDM) alternatives such as carpooling, vanpooling, telecommuting, and flexible work hours. Improve the mobility of people and goods by using strategies in advanced technologies such as Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). 3-2 February 2016

25 CHAPTER FOUR NETWORK IDENTIFICATION This chapter of the CMP presents an overview of the geographic area of application and the transportation network for the Pasco County CMP. AREA OF APPLICATION The CMP application area is inclusive of the MPO s metropolitan planning area, Pasco County, and includes the multimodal transportation system being evaluated and monitored to identify congestion management policies and strategies. TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Consistent with federal guidelines, the Pasco County CMP covers a multimodal transportation network. In addition to evaluating congestion on the roadway network, the Pasco County CMP Update evaluates transit, bicycle/pedestrian/multiuse path and freight movement networks within its designated area of application. The CMP roadway network is described below. Roadway Network The Pasco County CMP roadway network includes all existing functionally classified roadways and roads with construction funded in the next five years, known as the existing-plus-committed (E+C) network. For example, Map 4-1 illustrates the existing plus five-year committed roadway network and includes roadway projects through This map is representative of the study area and network for the Pasco County CMP. An updated version of this map will be included in each update of the State of the System Report. Walk-Bike Network The walk-bike network for the CMP is comprised of a combination of sidewalks, bicycle facilities and multiuse paths. An updated Walk-Bike Network map will be included in each update of the State of the System Report. For the purposes of the CMP evaluation and performance reporting, the following definitions are used for each of these facilities. Sidewalk: A paved walkway along the side of a street, typically within the right-of-way of said street for use by pedestrians, bicyclists, skaters or other non-motorized users. Multiuse Path: A paved route, physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier, either within a road Right-of-Way or exclusive Right-of-Way, with minimal crossflow by motor vehicles, and primarily used for transportation purposes, but may also be used for recreational purposes Bicycle Facility: Any paved area along a major roadway that is currently designated as a Bicycle lane or any additional paved area adjacent to vehicle travel lanes that meets FDOT, County or Municipal Code for a Bicycle lane width (it can also serve as a shoulder), or a multiuse path as defined above. 4-1 February 2016

26 Map 4-1 Area of Application & Road Network 4-2 February 2016

27 CHAPTER FIVE DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Performance measures are used as tools to measure and monitor the effectiveness of the transportation system in the CMP. They assist in identifying, tracking and monitoring congestion. However, these measures are dependent upon the transportation network and the availability of data. They are typically used to measure the extent and severity of congestion and for the evaluation of the effectiveness of the implemented strategies. As identified by FHWA, a set of good performance measures: are quantifiable data that is simple to present and interpret and has professional credibility; describe existing conditions, can be used to identify problems and to predict changes; can be calculated easily and with existing field data, techniques available for estimating the measure, achieves consistent results; apply to multiple modes, meaningful at varying scales and settings. 5-1 February 2016

28 PERFORMANCE MEASURES The performance measures for the Pasco County CMP were selected to address the existing conditions for Pasco County s multi-modal transportation network. The measures are also in compliance with the federal direction of using measures that cover multi-modal networks. The measures are organized into five major categories. These five categories are roadway, public transit, bicycle/pedestrian/multiuse path facility, transportation demand management, and goods movement. These CMP performance measures are listed below. Roadway Performance Measures Percent of Roadway Miles by LOS Type Percent of Vehicle Miles Traveled by LOS Type Public Transit Performance Measures Number of Transit Routes by Peak Service Frequency Passenger Trips (Annual Ridership) Passenger Trips per Revenue Hour Bicycle/Pedestrian/Multiuse Path Facility Performance Measures Percent of Congested Roadway Centerline Miles with Bicycle Facilities Percent of Congested Roadway Centerline Miles with Sidewalk Facilities Miles of existing Multiuse Paths Goods Movement Performance Measures Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Below LOS Standard on Designated Truck Routes Number of Crashes Involving Heavy Vehicles Safety Performance Measures Total Crashes Number of Crashes by Safety Emphasis Areas Number of Crashes Involving Heavy Vehicles Transportation Demand Management Available information on registered vanpools/carpools and riders. These performance measures were identified based on numerous monitoring activities currently conducted and/or planned by various local and state agencies for Pasco County. Detailed descriptions of each of these measures, together with an explanation of how the required data are or will be collected, are presented below. Developing additional performance measures resulting from implementation of MAP-21 will be included as part of future LRTP updates. 5-2 February 2016

29 Roadway Performance Measures Percent of Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) and Roadway Miles Below the Adopted Level of Service (LOS) Standard This measure summarizes the proportion of vehicle miles of travel and roadway miles below the adopted level of service standard to help quantify the level of congestion within the County. Data Collection/Availability The County/FDOT collects traffic volume and capacity data and performs LOS analysis on an annual basis for various planning purposes. LOS/MSV are generally based on FDOT Q/LOS methodology. V/C Ratio and V/MSV Ratio The volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio is used as the major tool in measuring roadway conditions and is a measure of the amount of traffic on a given roadway in relation to the amount of traffic the roadway was designed to handle. The volume to maximum service volume (V/MSV) is used to measure the amount of traffic on a roadway in relation to the adopted acceptable amount of traffic the roadway should be able to handle. Data Collection/Availability The County/FDOT collects traffic volume and capacity data and performs LOS analysis on an annual basis for various planning purposes based on the FDOT Q/LOS methodology. The County publishes the data into Geographic Information System (GIS) shape files, spreadsheets, and reports once the data are finalized. Public Transit Performance Measures Average Service Frequency and Number of Routes This measure summarizes the number of routes in Pasco County (fixed-route local bus service), including the average service frequency. Data Collection/Availability Pasco County Public Transportation (PCPT) maintains databases of various transit service and operational data including route networks. This data is typically available in a Geographic Information System (GIS) or spreadsheet formats and used regularly for PCPT service planning purposes. Passenger Trips (Annual Ridership) Annual ridership summarizes the total number of un-linked passenger trips from all transit routes that operates in the CMP application area in Pasco County. Passengers are counted each time they board vehicles no matter how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination. 5-3 February 2016

30 Data Collection/Availability The ridership data is considered one of the key performance indicators for any transit systems, and are collected regularly. PCPT ridership data maintained and summarized in various transit and related documents Passenger Trips per Revenue Hour Passenger Trips per Revenue Hour summarizes the total number of un-linked passenger trips from all transit routes that operates in the CMP application area in Pasco County divided by the total revenue hours. Passengers are counted each time they board vehicles no matter how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination. The total revenue hours are provided by PCPT. Data Collection/Availability PCPT regularly collects this data, which are reported in various day-to-day operations reports and annual reports such as the National Transit Database (NTD). Bicycle/Pedestrian/Multiuse Path Facility Performance Measures Percent of Congested CMP Roadway Centerline Miles with Bicycle Facilities This measure identifies the proportion of congested CMP centerline miles, where some type of bicycle facility exists, as defined by the respective planning agencies. Some communities consider paved shoulders and wide curb lanes to be bicycle facilities, with the exception of interstates and toll facilities. Data Collection/Availability The data are regularly collected and maintained by Pasco County and summarized in various local plans. Percent of Congested CMP Roadway Centerline Miles with Sidewalk Facilities The proportion of congested CMP roadway network centerline miles on which a sidewalk is available is measured. Data Collection/Availability The data are regularly collected and maintained by Pasco County and summarized in various local plans. Miles of Multiuse Paths This measure summarizes the total number of miles of multiuse path facilities in Pasco County. Multiuse path facilities usually are off-street facilities designated for the exclusive use of nonmotorized travel. They may be used by pedestrians, cyclists, wheelchair users, joggers, and other non-motorized users. 5-4 February 2016

31 Data Collection/Availability The data are regularly collected and maintained by Pasco County and summarized in various local plans. Goods Movement Performance Measures Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Below LOS Standard on Designated Truck Routes Measures the total vehicle miles of travel below the adopted LOS standard in Pasco County on designated truck routes. Designated truck routes from the latest LRTP will be used. The VMT for a roadway segment is calculated by multiplying the AADT of that segment by the length of the segment in miles. Data Collection/Availability The VMT performance data is calculated with the update of the State of the System Report. Number of Crashes Involving Heavy Vehicles These crashes involve heavy vehicles. It is considered a measure of non-recurring congestion that is often more significant when it involves heavy vehicles. This measure uses data that are widely available through the many local and state agencies that track these data on an ongoing basis throughout the CMP application area. Data Collection/Availability Crash data in Pasco County is collected through various law enforcement agencies including the Florida Highway Patrol, Pasco County Sheriff s Department, and the police departments of major cities in Pasco County. Safety Performance Measures Total Crashes Includes total crashes in the emphasis areas (described below) as well as crashes not part of the safety emphasis areas. Considered a measure of non-recurring congestion, this measure uses data that are widely available through the many local and state agencies that track these data on an ongoing basis throughout the CMP application area. Data Collection/Availability Crash data in Pasco County is collected through various law enforcement agencies including the Florida Highway Patrol, Pasco County Sheriff s Department, and the police departments of major cities in Pasco County. 5-5 February 2016

32 Number of Crashes by Safety Emphasis Area The crashes at intersections and roadway segments are used as an indicator of congestion. Considered a measure of non-recurring congestion, this measure uses data that are widely available through the many local and state agencies that track these data on an ongoing basis throughout the CMP application area. Data Collection/Availability Crash data in Pasco County is collected through various law enforcement agencies including the Florida Highway Patrol, Pasco County Sheriff s Department, and the police departments of major cities in Pasco County. In 2012, FDOT updated the 2006 SHSP. As is the process, the data used to identify the existing safety emphasis areas was reviewed to determine if any changes to the safety emphasis areas should be made. The data analysis resulted in the identification of six additional emphasis areas. Two, impaired driving and traffic data, were retained. The revised list of 2012 safety emphasis areas is shown below Safety Emphasis Areas: Aggressive Driving At Risk Drivers o Teen Drivers o Elderly Road Users Distracted Driving Impaired Driving Intersection Crashes Lane Departure Crashes Traffic Data Vulnerable Road Users o Bicyclists/Pedestrians o Motorcyclists 5-6 February 2016

33 2006 Safety Emphais Areas: Vulnerable Users Crashes involving pedestrians, bicyclists, or motorcyclists who are more vulnerable to severe injuries or death. Aggressive Driving Crashes that include impaired driving, reckless driving, or other crash types that often result in more serious crashes. Intersection Intersections are planned conflict points and provide the greatest exposure for crashes to occur. These are also locations where mitigation activities may yield the greatest benefit. Lane Departures Crashes that include headon collissions, run-off-theroad crashes and sideswipe crashes that typically result in serious injuries. Number of Crashes Involving Heavy Vehicles These crashes involve heavy vehicles. It is considered a measure of non-recurring congestion that is often more significant when it involves heavy vehicles. This measure uses data that are widely available through the many local and state agencies that track these data on an ongoing basis throughout the CMP application area. Data Collection/Availability Crash data in Pasco County is collected through various law enforcement agencies including the Florida Highway Patrol, Pasco County Sheriff s Department, and the police departments of major cities in Pasco County. TDM Performance Measures Number of Registered Carpools or Vanpools TDM Performance Measures could include the annual number of registered carpools and vanpools in CMP application area. A carpool is defined as a group of two or more people who commute to work or other destinations together in a private vehicle, while a vanpool is typically a prearranged group of 5 to 15 people who share their commute to work. Data Collection/Availability Currently, the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA), through a contracted operator, provides carpool/vanpool services in Pasco County and neighboring areas. TBARTA maintains data on the number of carpools and vanpools operating in Pasco County on an annual basis. TBARTA also maintains a list of registered carpool/vanpool users to match to carpools and vanpools. 5-7 February 2016

34 RELATIONSHIP OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Table 5-1 illustrates an example of the relationship between the performance measures identified above and the Goals and Objectives for the Congestion Management Process. Table 5-1 Relationship of Goals and Objectives to Performance Measures Goals & Objectives Roadway Performance Measures Public Bike/Ped Path Safety Transportation TDM Goods Movement Percent of VMT and Roadway Miles Below the Adopted Level of Service Standard Volume to Capacity (V/C Ratio) Volume to Maximum Service Ratio (V/MSV) Passenger Trips per Revenue Hour Passenger Trips (Annual Ridership) Average Service Frequency and Number of Routes Percent of Congested CMP Roadway Centerline Miles with Bicycle Facilities Percent of Congested CMP Roadway Centerline Miles with Sidewalk Facilities Miles of Multiuse Paths Number of Crashes by Safety Emphasis Area (at intersection, vulnerable users, lane departure and aggressive driving Number of Registered Carpools or Vanpools Truck Vehicle Miles (VMT) Traveled Below LOS Standard ***Number of Crashes Involving Heavy Vehicles (Reported with Safety in State of System Report) Goal 1: Integrate the Congestion Management Process and its proposed improvements into the Long Range Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program and help guide Land-use Policies and Land Development Regulations Objective Incorporate projects identified through the CMP in the Five-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Objective Develop land-use policies and land development regulations that support public transit, ridesharing, walking, and bicycling, especially for travel to pppaaa G ü n G work. pppaaa ü Goal 2: Develop, maintain, and expand bicycle, pedestrian, and multiuse path facilities for efficient and safe movement of people. Objective Coordinate transit services with bicycle, pedestrian, and multiuse path improvement projects. Objective Provide for pedestrian, multiuse path, transit, and bicycle facilities to encourage employees to use these facilities to get to work. Goal 3: Improve and increase transit as a viable transportation alternative. Objective Improve transit service in congested corridors by increasing service in congested corridors with existing service and implementing service in congested corridors currently not served by transit. Objective Develop multimodal strategies that reduce dependency on the single occupant vehicle (SOV). aaa G aaa G aaa pppaaa carpool lots. aaa ü aaa Objective Establish park-and-ride facilities and provide transit connections to park-and-ride facilities and Objective Increase efficiency of transit system through the use of appropriate new and advanced technologies that are feasible. Goal 4: Identify and implement strategies to mitigate congestion and improve the safety and mobility of people and goods and maintain the region s air quality Objective Identify and implement congestion management strategies to enhance the existing transportation system and relieve congestion, improve safety, and improve mobility of persons and goods, where large capital improvements may not be necessary. Objective Encourage using demand management and/or operations management strategies to solve congestion problems before adding capacity through general purpose lanes or new roadways where these strategies may eliminate the need to construct additional lanes. Objective Increase the efficiency of the transportation system through the use of low-cost Transportation Demand Management (TDM) alternatives such as carpooling, vanpooling, telecommuting, and ppp ü flexible work hours. pppaaa G ü n G pppaaa G ü n G Objective Improve the mobility of people and goods by using strategies in advanced technologies such as Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). pppaaa G n G 5-8 February 2016

35 CHAPTER SIX SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MONITORING PLAN The FHWA identifies congestion monitoring as just one of several aspects of transportation system performance that leads to more effective investment decisions for transportation improvements. Safety, physical condition, environmental quality, economic development, travel time reliability, quality of life, and customer satisfaction are among the aspects of performance that also require monitoring. The Final Rule on Metropolitan Transportation Planning identifies the requirement for a coordinated program for data collection and system performance monitoring to assess the extent of congestion, to contribute in determining the causes of congestion, and evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of implemented actions. In addition, it also indicates that to the extent possible, this data collection program should be coordinated with existing data sources and coordinated with operations managers in the metropolitan area. As a result, the goal of the Pasco County CMP system monitoring plan, as presented in Table 6-1, is to develop an ongoing system of monitoring and reporting that relies primarily on data already collected or planned to be collected in the County. The components of the monitoring plan include roadways, public transit/rideshare, bicycle/pedestrian/multiuse path, transportation demand management (TDM), and goods movement where: Roadways are monitored through annual LOS analysis using traffic counts and other related data constantly collected throughout the region; Crashes are monitored to help measure safety and non-recurring congestion; Transit performance is monitored continuously through various operating and capital plans; Bicycle/pedestrian/multiuse path inventory data are monitored and updated in various city and county databases; TDM-related data monitoring is done primarily by the TBARTA Commuter Assistance Program, which maintains an array of databases and coordinates programs to find alternatives for single occupant vehicle (SOV) trips in Pasco County and other counties in the Tampa Bay area; Significant goods movement corridors are evaluated to address mobility needs of the goods movement providers. The CMP will make use of the above available sources to create the State of the System Report to document the performance of the transportation system as described in more detail in Chapter 8 of this report. 6-1 February 2016

36 Table 6-1 System Performance Monitoring Plan Performance Measure Monitoring Activity Responsible Agency Current Status Geographic Area Covered Percent of Miles/VMT by LOS Type, V/C Ratio, V/MSV Ratio Level of Service Analysis Pasco County MPO/Cities/ FDOT Ongoing Pasco County CMP Roadway Network Passenger Trips per Revenue Hour, Passenger Trips, Number of Routes & Service National Transportation Database Report/Transit Development Plan Pasco County MPO/PCPT Ongoing Pasco County Percent Congested Miles on Ped. and Bike facilities, and Miles of Multiuse Path Facilities Bicycle/Pedestrian/Multiuse Path Plans, LRTP and Databases Pasco County MPO Ongoing Pasco County Percent of VMT on Designated Truck Route Corridors on congested roadways Roadway Databases and LRTP Pasco County MPO/FDOT Ongoing Pasco County Crash Frequency (By Safety Emphasis Area or Involving Heavy Trucks), Total Crashes, total crashes involving heavy vehicles Crash Data Analysis Pasco County Traffic Operations Division Ongoing Pasco County Number of Registered Carpools or Vanpools Annual Reports and Interim Summaries by TBARTA TBARTA Ongoing Pasco County The, as part of the system monitoring plan, will update the State of the System Report (SOSR) to coordinate with the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and Mobility Fee Update. Since traffic conditions don t change drastically from one year to the next, the MPO will update the SOSR to coincide with the adoption of the LRTP. It is anticipated that the SOSR would then be updated once between LRTP adoptions resulting in a 2-3 year gap between updates. This could occur more frequently if it s observed that changing traffic conditions warrant a more frequent review and evaluation of congestion. In the years when the SOSR is updated, a preliminary congestion map will be developed early in the year and a final congestion map toward the end of the year. The process is summarized on the following page: 6-2 February 2016

37 Between January and May preliminary existing and five year networks will be developed using the most recent County counts and the latest available FDOT counts, which will be behind the County counts (i.e. Typically the FDOT counts are not released until the late spring for the previous year counts for example 2014 counts will be released in Spring 2015). These networks will be used to create a preliminary congestion map. Between May and August, final existing and five year (committed) networks will be developed once the latest FDOT counts have been received These networks will be used to create a final congestion map. 6-3 February 2016

38 (This page intentionally left blank) 6-4 February 2016

39 CHAPTER SEVEN CONGESTED CORRIDOR SELECTION AND CMP STRATEGIES IMPLEMENTATION This section summarizes the implementation and management of the CMP strategies. This includes the process for selecting new corridors and future projects for implementation as well as an implementation schedule, responsibilities, costs, and possible funding sources for each strategy currently proposed for implementation. Due to the length of time the Pasco MPO has used a Congestion Management Process, a list of congested areas has been maintained and is routinely reviewed with the MPO s advisory committees. This list has been coordinated with the local implementing agencies and includes comments received from citizens regarding congestion as well. CONGESTED CORRIDOR SELECTION AND PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS The purpose of the CMP is to come up with implementable projects. The list of known congestion issues maintained by the MPO should continue to be used as a primary source in identifying opportunities. However, continued monitoring of the transportation system will provide additional information regarding new congestion where solutions will be needed. The 3-phase CMP process outlined below involves identifying and screening congested corridors in order to identify potential projects/programs that can be potentially implemented. The process follows three phases as described below and complements the federal 8 step process described in Chapter 2. Corridors to be evaluated are selected by coordinated efforts of BPAC, TAC, and the Mobility Task Force. Identify Congested Corridors and Locations for Review (Phase 1) Monitoring efforts are used to review the level of service on the roadway network to identify recurring congestion. Roadways that are congested today or forecasted to be congested in five years are considered for review through the CMP screening process. The MPO uses a tiered approach in identifying potential projects for implementation in the CMP. This approach includes a series of conditions or criteria for evaluating congestion and identifying the appropriate solution. 1. Roadway is congested without an identified short-term (Capital Improvement Program) or long-term (Long Range Transportation Plan) solution identified. 2. Intersection or operational improvements through corridor may provide a lower cost option that defers the need for roadway widening. 3. A higher than average crash rate indicates the need to identify safety solutions. 4. Conduct further evaluation of CMP corridors in the LRTP to identify future projected congestion. 5. Evaluate locations identified through stakeholder and citizen input documented in the MPO s CMP Spreadsheet. 7-1 February 2016

40 CMP and Safety Strategy Screening (Phase 2) Once congested corridors are selected for review, they are screened to identify mitigation strategies appropriate to reduce congestion or improve safety and reduce crashes. The Congestion Mitigation Process Strategy Matrix (found in Appendix A) is used to address recurring congestion, and the Safety Mitigation Strategy Matrix (found in Appendix B) is used to address non-recurring congestion. The matrix includes strategies in five tiers as identified in the Pasco County CMP Strategy Toolbox, as illustrated later in this section. The Congestion Mitigation Process Strategy Matrix typically is used in a workshop setting to quickly review a corridor, and the Safety Mitigation Strategy Matrix is applied based on a review of crash data. Because this phase is typically the most time consuming and data intensive, it s not always necessary to screen the congested corridors if previous analysis or evaluation has been conducted. In the case of the list maintained by the MPO, congestion issues may have already been identified or documented through citizen comment and observation making resulting in an easier identification of the appropriate strategy to address the congestion issue. Evaluate Project or Program for Implementation (Phase 3) The congestion or safety mitigation strategies that are identified as having the greatest potential benefit are then evaluated in greater detail based on committee or technical recommendations. During this phase, additional analysis of potential projects and programs is undertaken to identify the specific improvement, implementation issues, and costs. Programs such as demandreducing programs or policy changes are evaluated to identify recommended action items. Recommendations then are made for the projects or programs to be implemented. This may result in a near-immediate refocusing of existing resources, such as existing rideshare programs or local maintenance crews where possible, programming improvements in the local agency capital improvement programs or transportation improvement program, or using boxed funds controlled by the MPO, and finally may be identified as candidate projects for implementation in future Long Range Transportation Plans. This identification of projects and programs is coordinated with the CMP Task Force and sufficient information is provided to the local government staff for future consideration during the capital budgeting process. Congestion Management Strategies This section of the CMP Update identifies and evaluates the strategies intended for mitigating existing and future congestion in the Pasco County roadway network. A Toolbox of Strategies is presented to help decision makers and planners in effectively using these congestion reduction strategies. For MPOs with more than 200,000 people within their planning areas, SAFETEA-LU requires that the MPO shall address congestion management through the use of travel demand reduction and operational management strategies. In addition, the Final Rule on Statewide and Metropolitan Transportation Planning published on February 14, 2007, states that development of a congestion management process should result in multimodal system performance measures and strategies that can be reflected in the metropolitan transportation plan and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). 7-2 February 2016

41 A full range of potential strategies has been identified for the Pasco County in its multimodal CMP network. These strategies are included in the Pasco County CMP toolbox of strategies. A full range of demand and operational management strategies are identified in Appendix A to assist in its efforts to mitigate existing and future congestion. TOOLBOX OF STRATEGIES The CMP utilizes a strategy toolbox, known as the Congestion Mitigation Matrix, with multiple tiers of strategies in order to identify the most appropriate and effective projects for addressing congestion. Following an approach used by other MPOs and promoted by FHWA, the toolbox of congestion mitigation strategies is arranged so that the measures at the top take precedence over those at the bottom. The toolbox is presented below and the Congestion Mitigation Matrix is included in Appendix A. Pasco CMP Toolbox of Strategies Tier 1: Strategies to Reduce Person Trips or Vehicle Miles Traveled Tier 2: Strategies to Shift Automobile Trips to Other Modes Tier 3: Strategies to Shift Trips from SOV to HOV Auto/Van Tier 4: Strategies to Improve Roadway Operations Tier 5: Strategies to Add Capacity The top-down approach promotes the growing sentiment in today s transportation planning arena and follows FHWA s clear direction to consider all available solutions before recommending additional roadway capacity. The Pasco County CMP toolbox of strategies is divided by tiers, strategies, and specific examples. The remainder of this section outlines the tiers and strategies while the specific examples have been included in Appendix C. 7-3 February 2016

42 Tier 1: Strategies to Reduce Person Trips or Vehicle Miles Traveled Transportation Demand Management Strategies These strategies are used to reduce the use of single occupant motor vehicles, as the overall objective of TDM is to reduce the miles traveled by automobile. The following TDM strategies, not in any particular order, are available for consideration in the toolbox to potentially reduce travel in the peak hours. Land Use/Growth Management Strategies The strategies in this category include policies and regulations that would decrease the total number of auto trips and trip lengths while promoting transit and non-motorized transportation options. Tier 2: Strategies to Shift Automobile Trips to Other Modes Public Transit Strategies Two types of strategies, capital improvements and operating improvements, are used to enhance the attractiveness of public transit services to shift auto trips to transit. Transit capital improvements generally modernize the transit systems and improve their efficiency; operating improvements make transit more accessible and attractive. Non-Motorized Transportation Strategies Non-motorized strategies include bicycle, pedestrian, and multiuse path facility improvements that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation instead of single-occupant vehicle trips. Tier 3: Strategies to Shift Trips from Single-Occupancy Vehicles (SOV) to High-Occupancy Vehicles (HOV) Transportation Demand Management Strategies In addition to the TDM Strategies that are included in Tier 1, additional strategies are available in Tier 3 that encourage the use of ride-sharing and other forms of HOV implementation. 7-4 February 2016

43 Tier 4: Strategies to Improve Roadway Operations Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Strategies The strategies in ITS use new and emerging technologies to mitigate congestion while improving safety and environmental impacts. Typically, these systems are made up of many components, including sensors, electronic signs, cameras, controls, and communication technologies. ITS strategies are sets of components working together to provide information and allow greater control of the operation of the transportation system. Transportation Systems Management Strategies Transportation Systems Management (TSM) strategies identify operational improvements to enhance the capacity of the existing system. These strategies typically are used together with ITS technologies to better manage and operate existing transportation facilities. Freeway Incident Detection and Management Strategy This strategy addresses primarily non-recurring congestion which typically includes video monitoring and dispatch systems, and may also include roving service patrol vehicles. Access Management Strategy This strategy includes adoption of policies to regulate driveways and limit curb cuts and/or policies that require continuity of sidewalk, bicycle, and multiuse path networks. Corridor Preservation/Management Strategies Corridor Preservation: This strategy includes implementing, where applicable, land acquisition techniques such as full title purchases of future rights-of-way and purchase of easements to plan proactively in anticipation of future roadway capacity demands. Corridor Management: This strategy is applicable primarily in moderate- to highdensity areas and includes strategies to manage corridor rights-of-way. The strategies range from land-use regulations to landowner agreements such as subdivision reservations, which are mandatory dedications of portions of subdivided lots that lie in the future right-of-way. 7-5 February 2016

44 Tier 5: Strategies to Add Capacity Strategies to add capacity are the most costly and least desirable strategies and should be considered as last resort methods for reducing congestion. As the strategy of cities trying to build themselves out of congestion has not provided the intended results, capacity-adding strategies should be applied after determining the demand and operational management strategies identified earlier are not feasible solutions. The key strategy is to increase the capacity of congested roadways through additional general purpose travel lanes. CMP SAFETY MITIGATION MATRIX The Pasco CMP process also includes a CMP Safety Mitigation Matrix for use in streamlining the identification of potential safety issues identified in the identification of congested corridors by making use of crash data produced by the County s Crash Data Management System (CDMS). This system produces maps and reports by crash type or cause which and be used to identify safety issues on the major roadway network for both congested and non-congested roadways. Reducing the number of crashes that occur on major roadways can reduce nonreoccurring congestion. While the delay incurred resulting from crashes cannot be easily determined, it is a significant contribution of delay on major roadways. To support the integration of crash reduction as a means to reduce non-reoccurring congestion, a CMP Safety Mitigation Matrix was developed. The CMP Safety Solutions Matrix is provided in Appendix B. This Matrix is similar to the CMP Strategy Solutions Matrix (Appendix A) in that it should be used screen and identify potential strategies that would reduce congestion caused by specific crash types. The Matrix identifies the most common crash types and the typical strategies that could be implemented to improve safety and reduce these crashes. Special consideration is also given to relating these crashes to the four Safety Emphasis Areas identified in the State of Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan. In most cases additional detailed study will be required to identify the specific safety strategy or strategies to be implemented for a specific location. PROJECT AND PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION As mentioned previously, once corridors have been evaluated using the congestion management strategies matrix and safety matrix, potential projects or programs will be evaluated or identified in additional detail sufficient for those projects to be prioritized for implementation using the prioritization process identified in the remainder of this section. This additional level of evaluation will be dependent on the strategy being considered and the level of detail needed to move the project or program forward. In some cases this will require detail engineering analysis and planning level cost estimates and in other cases this will involve identifying issues that existing TDM or other ongoing activities need to address. Attention is directed to the fact that some improvements identified in the strategy matrix may require more than one year to evaluate and 7-6 February 2016

45 as a result may be considered for prioritization in subsequent years of the TIP development process. The State of the System report details the projects or programs considered for implementation and the status of those evaluations. The purpose of this step is to identify projects that can be funded or prioritized for implementation. METHODOLOGY FOR ESTABLISHING MULTIMODAL PRIORITIES Once projects and transportation programs have been identified on congested corridors or by the CMP Task Force, they are prioritized for funding on an annual basis. The CMP organizes congestion management and mobility improvement projects into five major categories, including: Intersection / ITS improvements Sidewalk /multiuse path projects Transit projects Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies Highway Projects This section identifies the process for the prioritization of multimodal projects. CMP IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS As illustrated in Figure 7-1, the CMP Implementation Process for the involves three basic steps, each of which is described below. Step 1: Identify and Prioritize Projects within each Category The MPO uses the following activities to recommend projects and strategies to reduce congestion and improve safety: 1. Projects and programs are identified and discussed with the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) or the CMP Task Force. 2. In addition to these groups, goods movement stakeholders are asked for congested corridors recommendations, and Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST) stakeholders are asked for corridors needing safety recommendations. 3. During these meetings, the MPO s Congestion Management Process (CMP) spreadsheet is reviewed and kept up to date with activities performed. The spreadsheet allows the MPO to track the status of problem areas and work that has been performed, as well as to identify potential projects/solutions. 4. The MPO identifies congested areas that may or may not be identified during the Long Range Transportation Planning process. As part of the CMP Update, congested areas are reviewed including reviewing corridors using the congestion maps displayed in Chapter The MPO uses the Pedestrian Safety Action Plan and the Bus Stop Accessibility & Connectivity Study to identify projects and strategies that can be included in the project identification process. 7-7 February 2016

46 6. The MPO uses the Project Selection Process, as documented within the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), to identify and prioritize projects for different modes such as: a. Intersection / ITS improvements b. Sidewalk / multiuse path projects c. Transit projects d. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies e. Highway Projects The project list developed for the CMP reflects changes made to the TIP, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and the FDOT Five-Year Work Program. Projects have been added or removed due to funding priorities. Figure 7 1: CMP Project Prioritization Overview STEP 1 Identify and prioritize projects within the CMP categories. Intersection / ITS Projects Sidewalk / Multiuse Path Projects Transit Projects Transportation Demand Management Highway Projects STEP 2 Pursue and allocate funding to each of the CMP categories. STEP 3 Implement projects as funding is obtained and allocated. 7-8 February 2016

47 Step 2: Pursue and Allocate Funding to each of the CMP Categories Available funding will likely come from money set aside by the MPO to support CMP projects on an annual basis. In addition, the Florida Department of Transportation Alternatives Program primarily funds sidewalk and multiuse path projects. Other sources also may be identified to fund lower cost, short-term transportation improvements. Using the prioritized lists of projects developed for each category in Step 1, the MPO and the CMP Task Force can allocate existing funding to projects and pursue new funding sources for projects as deemed appropriate. Step 3: Implement Projects as Funding is Obtained and Allocated Once projects are identified and prioritized within each category (Step 1) and funding has been identified, pursued, and allocated to the appropriate category (Step 2), projects can be implemented as funding is obtained and allocated to projects in order of priority. METHODOLOGY FOR SETTING PRIORITIES Figure 7-2 illustrates the methodology for establishing priorities within each of the five categories of transportation improvements identified and included in the CMP for the Pasco County MPO. A full discussion of the methodology for each mode is included on the following pages. Intersection / ITS Priorities Intersections are identified and evaluated using four primary criteria: congestion, safety, regional significance, and right-of-way availability. Each intersection receives one of three possible scores for each criterion (high-5, medium-3, or low-1). The intersection scores are then summed and ranked from high to low to reflect intersection priorities from a technical perspective. Guidance for measuring the four criteria is provided below. Congestion To facilitate a relative comparison of congestion, the approach volumes entering an intersection are summed and divided by the number of lanes approaching the intersection. The result is an average volume per lane that can then be compared to other intersections. The intersections are ranked from high to low according to the average volume per lane, with the highest 1/3 receiving a score of 5, the next 1/3 receiving a score of 3, and the lowest 1/3 receiving a score of 1. This analysis is conducted for planned network and projected traffic volumes five years in the future. Safety Crashes are totaled for intersections over the past three years. Intersections are ranked from high to low based on the total number of crashes over the three-year period. Similar to congestion, the highest 1/3 receive a score of 5, the next 1/3 receive a score of 3, and the lowest 1/3 receive a score of February 2016

48 Figure 7-2: CMP Prioritization Process 7-10 February 2016

49 Regional Significance Intersections are assigned scores to reflect the relative regional significance. Scores of 5 (high), 3 (medium), and 1 (low) are selected by the analyst according to knowledge and judgment of the intersection and its regional significance. Right-of-Way Availability A review of right-of-way availability is critical to determining the feasibility of future intersection improvements. Intersections are assigned a score of 5, 3, or 1 to reflect the degree to which right-of-way is available for expansion of the intersection. Sidewalk / Multiuse Path Priorities Prior to establishing sidewalk or multiuse path priorities, a list of candidate sidewalk projects is developed based on input from the CMP Task Force, the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and the citizens of Pasco County. Candidate projects are measured based on the extent to which the following criteria are met. addresses safety issue (40 points) provides continuity (10 points) provides access to school (10 points) provides access to transit (10 points) provides access to major/multiple activity centers (10 points) Provides accessibility for transportation disadvantaged populations (10 points) Is found in local and/or regional plans (10 points) A sidewalk / multiuse path project is assigned points for each criterion that is met, meaning that each project has the potential of being assigned 100 points. The scores are summed and the projects are then ranked from high to low. Transit Priorities The first step in establishing transit priorities is to identify transit projects from the latest major update of the Transit Development Plan (TDP) and add additional projects to the list based on input from the CMP Task Force, the Citizens Advisory Committee, and citizens of Pasco County. Transit projects may take the form of service improvements (frequency, hours of service, etc.) or infrastructure investments (buses, shelters, etc.). Scores are assigned to the transit projects consistent with programmed priorities, including: Funded project in the TDP (7 points) Unfunded project in the TDP (5 points) Funded project in the LRTP (interim year) (3 points) Funded project in the LRTP beyond the interim year (1 point) The next step is to assign a bonus score of 5 points to each transit project that is located along a congested corridor, as projected five years into the future. The list of transit projects is then 7-11 February 2016

50 updated to reflect these bonus points and the projects are prioritized based on the total number of points from high to low. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) TDM strategies attempt to reduce peak period automobile trips by increasing the number of people in each vehicle or by influencing the time of, or need to, travel. TDM solutions rely on incentives, or disincentives, to change travel behavior. The term TDM encompasses both the alternatives to driving alone and the strategies that encourage the use of other modes of travel. Examples of TDM strategies include vanpooling, carpooling, flex-time, and staggered work hours, among others. Candidate projects are identified based on input from the CMP Task Force, the Citizens Advisory Committee, and the citizens of Pasco County, as well as the TDM projects identified in the MPO s LRTP. At this time, the priorities for TDM projects are determined by what is programmed in the LRTP. A TDM project programmed before the interim year of the LRTP is assigned a score of 5 points, while a TDM project programmed beyond the interim year of the LRTP is assigned a score of 3 points. Highway Priorities Roadway capacity expansion project prioritization occurs as part of the MPO s long-range transportation planning process. The LRTP is updated routinely and includes significant efforts to identify, evaluate, and prioritize capacity-related projects. The results of this LRTP corridor evaluation are used by MPO staff to guide the development of an annual list of project priorities. These roadway expansion projects are generally high-cost, long-term capital investments and not considered part of the short-term, lower-cost investments associated with the CMP February 2016

51 CHAPTER EIGHT MONITOR STRATEGY EFFECTIVENESS Introduction The FHWA guidelines call for CMPs to include provisions to monitor the performance of strategies implemented to address congestion. Regulations require a process for periodic assessment of the efficiency and effectiveness of implemented strategies, in terms of the area s established performance measures. This step of the process helps determine whether operational or policy adjustments are needed to make the current strategies work better and provides information about how various strategies work in order to implement future approaches within the CMP study area. Data collection and performance monitoring are ongoing with the various periodic assessments of roadway, transit, bicycle/pedestrian/multiuse path, freight network performance in Pasco County. However, this CMP also identifies the need for a process that supports tracking of the effectiveness of the implemented congestion mitigation strategies and the multi-modal transportation system as a whole. This process is described in detail below. State of the System Report As a key tool in the Pasco County Congestion Management Process, a State of the System Report will be developed to track the effectiveness of the implemented strategies, to the extent possible with the available project level data, and conditions of the multi-modal transportation system as a whole. The same set of quantifiable performance measures established for the Pasco County CMP as described in Chapter 6 of this report will be used to measure system performance at corridor and system levels. The measures that will be utilized in the State of the System Report on Pasco County CMP include: Roadway Performance Measures including percent of roadway miles and VMT by LOS Type as well as roadway traffic volume to capacity and volume to maximum service volume ratios. Transit Performance Measures including passenger trips per revenue hour, passenger trips, and the number of routes. Bicycle / Pedestrian / Multiuse Path Performance Measures including percent of congested CMP roadway centerline miles with bicycle facilities, percent of congested CMP roadway centerline miles with sidewalk facilities, and miles of multiuse paths. Goods Movement Performance Measures including the % of total VMT on truck routes on congested roadways. Safety Measures including total crashes, total crashes by safety emphasis areas, and total crashes involving heavy vehicles. 8-1 February 2016

52 (This page intentionally left blank) 8-2 February 2016

53 Appendix A Pasco County CMP Strategy Solutions Matrix A-1 February 2016

54 Distributionof Trip Types Tier Strategy Congestion Mitigation Strategy Regional Traffic Regional Access Local Access Local Circulation Transit Benefit Potential Effectiveness Recommendations/ Comments TIER 1: Strategies to Reduce Person Trips or Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Congestion Pricing: Congestion pricing can be implemented statically or dynamically. Static congestion pricing requires that tolls are higher during traditional peak periods. Dynamic congestion pricing allows toll rates to vary depending upon actual traffic conditions. The more congested the road, the higher the cost to travel on the road. Dynamic congestion pricing works best when coupled with real time information on the availability of other routes. Alternative Work Hours: There are three main variations: staggered hours, flex time, and compressed work weeks. Staggered hours require employees in different work groups to start at different times to spread out their arrival/departure times. Flex time allows employees to arrive and leave outside of the traditional commute period. Compressed work weeks involve reducing the number of days per week worked while increasing the number of hours worked per day. Telecommuting: Telecommuting policies allow employees to work at home or a regional telecommute center instead of going into the office, all the time or only one or more days per week. Emergency Ride Home Programs: These programs provide a safety net to those people who carpool or use transit to work so that they can get to their destination if unexpected work demands or an emergency arises. Alternative Mode Marketing and Education: Providing education on alternative modes of transportation can be an effective way of increasing demand for alternative modes. This strategy can include mapping websites that compute A-2 February 2016

55 Distributionof Trip Types Tier Strategy Congestion Mitigation Strategy Regional Traffic Regional Access Local Access Local Circulation Transit Benefit Potential Effectiveness Recommendations/ Comments directions and travel times for multiple modes of travel. TIER 1: Strategies to Reduce Person Trips or Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Safe Routes to Schools Program: This federally funded program provides 100 percent funding to communities to invest in pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure surrounding schools. Preferential for Free Parking for HOVs: This program provides an incentive for employees to carpool with preferred of free of charge parking for HOVs. Negotiated Demand Management Agreements: As a condition of development approval, local governments require the private sector to contribute to traffic mitigation agreements. The agreements typically set a traffic reduction goal (often expressed as a minimum level of ridesharing participation or a stipulated reduction in the number of automobile trips). Trip Reduction Ordinance: These ordinances use a locality s regulatory authority to limit trip generation from a development. They spread the burden of reducing trip generation among existing and future developments better than Negotiated Demand Management Agreements. Infill developments: This strategy takes advantage of infrastructure that already exists, rather than building new infrastructure on the fringes of the urban area. Design Guidelines for Pedestrian Oriented Development: Maximum block lengths, building setback restrictions, and streetscape enhancements are examples of design guidelines that can be codified in zoning ordinances to encourage pedestrian activity. A-3 February 2016

56 Distributionof Trip Types Tier Strategy Congestion Mitigation Strategy Regional Traffic Regional Access Local Access Local Circulation Transit Benefit Potential Effectiveness Recommendations/ Comments Mixed Use Development: This strategy allows many trips to be made without automobiles. People can walk to restaurants and services rather than use their vehicles. Transit Capacity Expansion: This strategy adds new vehicles to expand transit services. TIER 2: Strategies to Shift Automobile Trips to Other Modes Increasing Bus Route Coverage or Frequencies: This strategy provides better accessibility to transit to a greater share of the population. Increasing frequency makes transit more attractive to use. Implementing Premium Transit: Premium transit such as Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) best serves dense urban centers where travelers can walk to their destinations. Premium transit from suburban areas can sometimes be enhanced by providing park and ride lots. Providing Real Time Information on Transit Routes: Providing realtime information on bus progress either at bus stops, terminals, and/or personal wireless devices makes bus travel more attractive Reducing Transit Fares: This relatively easy to implement strategy encourages additional transit use, to the extent that high fares are a real barrier to transit. However, due to the direct financial impact on the transit system operating budgets, reductions in selected fare categories may be a more feasible strategy to implement. Provide Exclusive Bus Right Of Way: Exclusive right of way includes bus ways, bus only lanes, and bus bypass ramps. This strategy is applied to freeways and major highways that have routes with high ridership. A-4 February 2016

57 Distributionof Trip Types Tier Strategy Congestion Mitigation Strategy Regional Traffic Regional Access Local Access Local Circulation Transit Benefit Potential Effectiveness Recommendations/ Comments TIER 2: Strategies to Shift Automobile Trips to Other Modes New Sidewalk Connections: Increasing sidewalk connectivity encourages pedestrian traffic for short trips. Designated Bicycle Lanes on Facilities or Routes: Enhancing the visibility of bicycle facilities increases the perception of safety. In many cases, bicycle lanes can be added to existing roadways through restriping. Improved Bicycle Facilities at Transit Stations and Other Trip Destinations: Bicycle racks and bicycle lockers at transit stations and other trip destinations increase security. Additional amenities such as locker rooms with showers at workplaces provide further incentives for using bicycles. Improved Safety of Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities: Maintaining lighting, signage, striping, traffic control devices, and pavement quality and installing curb cuts, curb extensions, median refuges, and raised crosswalks can increase bicycle and pedestrian safety. Exclusive Non Motorized ROW: Abandoned rail rights of way and existing parkland can be used for medium to long distance bicycle paths, improving safety and reducing travel times. Intermodal Enhancements: Coordinating modes makes movement from one mode to the other easier. These enhancements typically includes schedule modification to reduce layover time or increase the opportunity for transfers, creation of multi modal facilities, informational kiosks, and improved amenities at transfer locations. A-5 February 2016

58 Distributionof Trip Types Tier Strategy Congestion Mitigation Strategy Regional Traffic Regional Access Local Access Local Circulation Transit Benefit Potential Effectiveness Recommendations/ Comments TIER Ridesharing (Carpools & Vanpools): In ridesharing programs, participants are matched with potential candidates for sharing rides. This is typically arranged/encouraged through employers or transportation management agencies, which provide ride matching services. These programs are more effective if combined with HOV lanes, parking management, guaranteed ride home policies, and employerbased incentive programs. TIER High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes: This increases corridor capacity while at the same time providing an incentive for single occupant drivers to shift to ridesharing. These lanes are most effective as part of a comprehensive effort to encourage HOVs, including publicity, outreach, park and ride lots, rideshare matching services, and employer incentives. TIER 3: Strategies to Increase Vehicle Occupancy Park and Ride Lots: These lots can be used in conjunction with HOV lanes and/or express bus services. They are particularly helpful when coupled with other commute alternatives such as carpool/vanpool programs, transit, and/or HOV lanes. Employer Landlord Parking Agreements: Employers can negotiate leases so that they pay only for parking spaces used by employees. In turn, employers can pass along parking savings by purchasing transit passes or reimbursing non driving employees with the cash equivalent of a parking space. A-6 February 2016

59 Distributionof Trip Types Tier Strategy Congestion Mitigation Strategy Regional Traffic Regional Access Local Access Local Circulation Transit Benefit Potential Effectiveness Recommendations/ Comments TIER 3: Strategies to Increase Vehicle Occupancy TIER 4: Strategies to Improve Roadway Operations Parking Management: This strategy reduces the instance of free parking to encourage other modes of transportation. Options include reducing the minimum number of parking spaces required per development, increasing the share of parking spaces for HOVs, introducing or raising parking fees, providing cash out options for employees not using subsidized parking spaces, and expanding parking at transit stations or parkand ride lots. Managed Lanes: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) defines managed lanes as highway facilities or a set of lanes in which operational strategies are implemented and managed (in real time) in response to changing conditions. Examples of managed lanes may include the following: high occupancy toll (HOT) lanes with tolls that vary based on demand; exclusive bus only lanes; HOV and clean air and/or energyefficient vehicle lanes; and HOV lanes that could be changed into HOT lanes in response to changing levels of traffic and roadway conditions. Dynamic Messaging: Dynamic messaging uses changeable message signs to warn motorists of downstream queues; it provides travel time estimates, alternate route information, and information on special events, weather, or accidents. Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS): ATIS provide an extensive amount of data to travelers, such as real time speed estimates on the web or over wireless devices and transit vehicle schedule progress. It also provides information on alternative route options. A-7 February 2016

60 Distributionof Trip Types Tier Strategy Congestion Mitigation Strategy Regional Traffic Regional Access Local Access Local Circulation Transit Benefit Potential Effectiveness Recommendations/ Comments TIER 4: Strategies to Improve Roadway Operations Integrated Corridor Management (ICM): This strategy, built on an ITS platform, provides for the coordination of the individual network operations between parallel facilities creating an interconnected system. A coordinated effort between networks along a corridor can effectively manage the total capacity in a way that will result in reduced congestion. Transit Signal Priority (TSP): This strategy uses technology located onboard transit vehicles or at signalized intersections to temporarily extend green time, allowing the transit vehicle to proceed without stopping at a red light. Traffic Signal Coordination: Signals can be pre timed and isolated, pre timed and synchronized, actuated by events (such as the arrival of a vehicle, pedestrian, bus or emergency vehicle), set to adopt one of several pre defined phasing plans based on current traffic conditions, or set to calculate an optimal phasing plan based on current conditions. Channelization: This strategy is used to optimize the flow of traffic for making left or right turns usually using concrete islands or pavement markings. Intersection Improvements: Intersections can be widened and lanes restriped to increase intersection capacity and safety. This may include auxiliary turn lanes (right or left) and widened shoulders. Bottleneck Removal: This strategy removes or corrects short, isolated, and temporary lane reductions, substandard design elements, and other physical limitations that form a capacity constraint that results in a traffic bottleneck. A-8 February 2016

61 Distributionof Trip Types Tier Strategy Congestion Mitigation Strategy Regional Traffic Regional Access Local Access Local Circulation Transit Benefit Potential Effectiveness Recommendations/ Comments Vehicle Use Limitations and Restrictions: This strategy includes all day or selected time of day restrictions of vehicles, typically trucks, to increase roadway capacity. Improved Signage: Improving or removing signage to clearly communicate location and direction information can improve traffic flow. Geometric Improvements for Transit: This strategy includes providing for transit stop locations that do not affect the flow of traffic, improve sight lines, and improve merging and diverging of buses and cars. Goods Movement Management: This strategy restricts delivery or pickup of goods in certain areas to reduce congestion. Freeway Incident Detection and Management Systems: This strategy addresses primarily nonrecurring congestion, typically includes video monitoring and dispatch systems, and may also include roving service patrol vehicles. Access Management Policies: This strategy includes adoption of policies to regulate driveways and limit curb cuts and/or policies that require continuity of sidewalk, bicycle, and multiuse path networks Corridor Preservation: This strategy includes implementing, where applicable, land acquisition techniques such as full title purchases of future rights of way and purchase of easements to plan proactively in anticipation of future roadway capacity demands. A-9 February 2016

62 Distributionof Trip Types Tier Strategy Congestion Mitigation Strategy Regional Traffic Regional Access Local Access Local Circulation Transit Benefit Potential Effectiveness Recommendations/ Comments TIER 4: Strategies to Improve Roadway Operations TIER 5: Strategies to Add Capacity Corridor Management: This strategy is applicable primarily in moderate to high density areas and includes strategies to manage corridor rights of way. The strategies range from land use regulations to landowner agreements such as subdivision reservations, which are mandatory dedications of portions of subdivided lots that lie in the future right of way. Complete Streets: Routinely design and operate the entire right of way to enable safe access for all users including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit Element that may be found on a complete street include sidewalks, bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders), special bus lanes, comfortable and accessible transit stops, frequent crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, and more. Add General Purpose Travel Lanes: Increase the capacity of congested roadways through additional general purpose travel lanes. Roundabouts: Roundabouts are used to improve traffic operations at an intersections. They do not require a complete stop by all vehicles, which minimizes both individual delay and delays resulting from vehicle queues. Roundabouts typically produce less severe traffic crashes than a conventional signalized intersection, however they may not be an appropriate treatment at all intersections. A-10 February 2016

63 Distributionof Trip Types Tier Strategy Congestion Mitigation Strategy Regional Traffic Regional Access Local Access Local Circulation Transit Benefit Potential Effectiveness Recommendations/ Comments TIER 5: Strategies to Add Capacity Arterial Managed Lanes with Tolled Grade Separation: Arterial management seeks to alleviate the capacity constraints at major intersections. Tolled Grade Separation provides the option to pay a toll and bypass the signal using the grade separated managed lanes. Parallel Capacity Expansion: This can include developing a parallel corridor to provide an alternative route, and/or increasing the degree of connectivity in the surrounding roadway network. Various methods exist to measure network connectivity, but the general concept emphasizes that increasing the number of alternate routes in a network will disperse congestion that would otherwise be forced onto only one major corridor. A-11 February 2016

64 (This page intentionally left blank) A-12 February 2016

65 Appendix B Pasco County CMP Safety Solutions Matrix B-1 February 2016

66 Related Crash Types Angle and left turn crashes occurring at stop controlled intersections Crashes that occur during slippery or wet conditions Angle and left turn crashes occurring away from signalized intersections Left turn crashes occurring at signalized intersections Crashes that occur during night time hours Rear end crashes with injuries. Crashes that involve a u turning vehicle Crashes that occur at driveways away from signalized intersections Crashes that occurred along a curved section of roadway Crashes that involve vehicles leaving the roadway, including single vehicle collisions with fixed objects Crashes that involve left turning vehicles Crashes that involve right turning vehicles Strategic Highway Safety Plan Aggressive Driving Intersection Lane Departure Vulnerable Road User Crash Frequency along the Corridor (circle one) N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH Standard Mitigation Provide advance warning sign on approach to intersection. Double up on traffic control signs. Provide warning flashers. Evaluate for possible signalization. Improve pavement friction through resurfacing or high friction overlays. Channelize toprohibit a specific movement. Close median to prohibit all movements. Install of protected left turn phasing at signalized intersections. Consider protected only left turn phasing. Provide street lighting to increase road visibility at nighttime. Provide advance signal warning sign at signalized intersections. Provide advance street name signs. Prohibit U turns at signalized intersection where there are conflicts with channelized right turns. Prohibit U turns along corridors where sight distance is inadequate or there are conflicts. Consolidate driveways to decrease vehicular conflict points. Provide raised medians. Provide advance warning sign on approach to turns, particularly along rural roadways. Enhance signage. Provide solar flashing beacons on signs. Provide guardrail. Provide delineation along the curve and inverted profile pavement markings (or raised pavement markings). Provide advance warning sign on approach to turns, particularly along rural roadways. Provide turn lanes, increase left turn storage, provide positive offset. Provide turn lanes, prohibit rightturn on red, provide receiving lane for channelized right turn. B-2 February 2016

67 Related Crash Types Crashes that involve motorcycles Crashes that occur at intersections that involve parked cars Crashes that involve pedestrians Crashes that involve bicyclists Rear end and angle crashes at signalized intersections along east west corridors Crashes involving a heavy trucks Crashes that cite disregard of traffic control as a contributing cause. Crashes that involve a speeding vehicle (cited by officer) Crashes where drugs and/or alcohol was involved Strategic Highway Safety Plan Aggressive Driving Intersection Lane Departure Vulnerable Road User Crash Frequency along the Corridor (circle one) N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH N/A LOW MED HIGH Standard Mitigation Evaluatepavement friction. Evaluate shoulders to ensure proper drainage. Increase speed enforcement. Prohibit parking near major intersections to increase driver/pedestrian visibility. Provide countdown heads for signalized intersections, refuge islands for unsignalized crossings, sidewalks along roadways, consolidate driveways to decrease vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. Provide countdown heads for signalized intersections, refuge islands for unsignalized crossings, bike lanes along roadways, consolidate driveways to decrease vehicle/bicyclist conflict points. Install backplates or high visibility back plates on signalized intersections to increase signal head conspicuity (particularly along east west corridors). Provide adequate clearance for heavy truck's reduced stopping distance at signals or provide dilemma zone detection at signals. Provide passing lanes, and acceleration/deceleration lanes. Increase turn radius. Increase red light running enforcement. Increase speed enforcement. Install post mounted speed feedback signs. Increase DUI enforcement. B-3 February 2016

68 (This page intentionally left blank) B-4 February 2016

69 Appendix C Pasco County CMP Toolbox of Strategies C-1 February 2016

70 Tier 1: Strategies to Reduce Person Trips or Vehicle Miles Traveled Transportation Demand Management Strategies These strategies are used to reduce the use of single occupant motor vehicles, as the overall objective of TDM is to reduce the miles traveled by automobile. The following TDM strategies, not in any particular order, are available for consideration in the toolbox to potentially reduce travel in the peak hours. Strategies include: Congestion Pricing: Congestion pricing can be implemented statically or dynamically. Static congestion pricing requires that tolls are higher during traditional peak periods. Dynamic congestion pricing allows toll rates to vary depending upon actual traffic conditions. The more congested the road, the higher the cost to travel on the road. Dynamic congestion pricing works best when coupled with real-time information on the availability of other routes. Alternative Work Hours: There are three main variations: staggered hours, flex-time, and compressed work weeks. Staggered hours require employees in different work groups to start at different times to spread out their arrival/departure times. Flex-time allows employees to arrive and leave outside of the traditional commute period. Compressed work weeks involve reducing the number of days per week worked while increasing the number of hours worked per day. Telecommuting: Telecommuting policies allow employees to work at home or a regional telecommute center instead of going into the office, all the time or only one or more days per week. Guaranteed Ride Home Programs: These programs provide a safety net to those people who carpool or use transit to work so that they can get to their destination if unexpected work demands or an emergency arises. Alternative Mode Marketing and Education: Providing education on alternative modes of transportation can be an effective way of increasing demand for alternative modes. This strategy can include mapping Websites that compute directions and travel times for multiple modes of travel. Safe Routes to Schools Program: This federally-funded program provides 100 percent funding to communities to invest in pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure surrounding schools. Preferential or Free Parking for HOVs: This program provides an incentive for employees to carpool with preferred of free-of-charge parking for HOVs. Land Use/Growth Management Strategies C-2 February 2016

71 The strategies in this category include policies and regulations that would decrease the total number of auto trips and trip lengths while promoting transit and non-motorized transportation options. These strategies include the following. Negotiated Demand Management Agreements: As a condition of development approval, local governments require the private sector to contribute to traffic mitigation agreements. The agreements typically set a traffic reduction goal (often expressed as a minimum level of ridesharing participation or a stipulated reduction in the number of automobile trips). Trip Reduction Ordinance: These ordinances use a locality s regulatory authority to limit trip generation from a development. They spread the burden of reducing trip generation among existing and future developments better than Negotiated Demand Management Agreements. Infill developments: This strategy takes advantage of infrastructure that already exists, rather than building new infrastructure on the fringes of the urban area. Transit Oriented Developments: This strategy clusters housing units and/or businesses near transit stations in walkable communities. By providing convenient access to alternative modes, auto dependence can be reduced. Design Guidelines for Pedestrian-Oriented Development: Maximum block lengths, building setback restrictions, and streetscape enhancements are examples of design guidelines that can be codified in zoning ordinances to encourage pedestrian activity. Mixed-Use Development: This strategy allows many trips to be made without automobiles. People can walk to restaurants and services rather than use their vehicles. Tier 2: Strategies to Shift Automobile Trips to Other Modes Public Transit Strategies Two types of strategies, capital improvements and operating improvements, are used to enhance the attractiveness of public transit services to shift auto trips to transit. Transit capital improvements generally modernize the transit systems and improve their efficiency; operating improvements make transit more accessible and attractive. The following strategies are included in the toolbox for consideration. Transit Capacity Expansion: This strategy adds new vehicles to expand transit services. C-3 February 2016

72 Increasing Bus Route Coverage or Frequencies: This strategy provides better accessibility to transit to a greater share of the population. Increasing frequency makes transit more attractive to use. Implementing Premium Transit: Premium transit such as Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) best serves dense urban centers where travelers can walk to their destinations. Premium transit from suburban areas can sometimes be enhanced by providing park-and-ride lots. Providing Real-Time Information on Transit Routes: Providing real-time information on bus progress either at bus stops, terminals, and/or personal wireless devices makes bus travel more attractive. Reducing Transit Fares: This relatively easy-to-implement strategy encourages additional transit use, to the extent that high fares are a real barrier to transit. However, due to the direct financial impact on the transit system operating budgets, reductions in selected fare categories may be a more feasible strategy to implement. Provide Exclusive Bus Right-Of-Way: Exclusive right-of-way includes bus ways, busonly lanes, and bus bypass ramps. This strategy is applied to freeways and major highways that have routes with high ridership. Non-Motorized Transportation Strategies Non-motorized strategies include bicycle, pedestrian, and multiuse path facility improvements that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation instead of single-occupant vehicle trips. The following strategies are included. New Sidewalk Connections: Increasing sidewalk connectivity encourages pedestrian traffic for short trips. Designated Bicycle Lanes on Local Streets: Enhancing the visibility of bicycle facilities increases the perception of safety. In many cases, bicycle lanes can be added to existing roadways through restriping. Improved Bicycle Facilities at Transit Stations and Other Trip Destinations: Bicycle racks and bicycle lockers at transit stations and other trip destinations increase security. Additional amenities such as locker rooms with showers at workplaces provide further incentives for using bicycles. Improved Safety of Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities: Maintaining lighting, signage, striping, traffic control devices, and pavement quality and installing curb cuts, curb extensions, median refuges, and raised crosswalks can increase bicycle and pedestrian safety. C-4 February 2016

73 Exclusive Non-Motorized ROW: Abandoned rail rights-of-way and existing parkland can be used for medium- to long-distance multiuse paths, improving safety and reducing travel times. Complete Streets: Routinely design and operate the entire right of way to enable safe access for all users including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit Element that may be found on a complete street include sidewalks, bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders), special bus lanes, comfortable and accessible transit stops, frequent crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, and more. Tier 3: Strategies to Shift Trips from Single-Occupancy Vehicles (SOV) to High-Occupancy Vehicles (HOV) Transportation Demand Management Strategies In addition to the TDM Strategies that are included in Tier 1, additional strategies are available in Tier 3 that encourage the use of ride-sharing and other forms of HOV implementation. Ridesharing (Carpools & Vanpools): In ridesharing programs, participants are matched with potential candidates for sharing rides. This is typically arranged/encouraged through employers or transportation management agencies, which provide ride-matching services. These programs are more effective if combined with HOV lanes, parking management, guaranteed ride home policies, and employerbased incentive programs. High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes: This increases corridor capacity and provides an incentive for single-occupant drivers to shift to ridesharing. These lanes are most effective as part of a comprehensive effort to encourage HOVs, including publicity, outreach, park-and-ride lots, rideshare matching services, and employer incentives. Park-and-Ride Lots: These lots can be used in conjunction with HOV lanes and/or express bus services. They are particularly helpful when coupled with other commute alternatives such as carpool/vanpool programs, transit, and/or HOV lanes. Employer-Landlord Parking Agreements: Employers can negotiate leases so that they pay only for parking spaces used by employees. In turn, employers can pass along parking savings by purchasing transit passes or reimbursing non-driving employees with the cash equivalent of a parking space. Parking Management: This strategy reduces the instance of free parking to encourage other modes of transportation. Options include reducing the minimum number of parking C-5 February 2016