Fast Tracking Product Design can you afford the luxury of more time?

Transcription

1 Wes Shimanek, Workstation Segment Manager, Datacenter Group, Technical Computing Group, Intel Corporation Fast Tracking Product Design can you afford the luxury of more time? Solid Edge University 2014 May 12-14, Atlanta, GA, USA 4 SOLID EDGE UNIVERSITY 2014 Re-imagine What s Possible #SEU14

2 To Compete You Must Compute optimizing ideation a key to sustained competitiveness The future is something which everyone reaches at the rate of 60 minutes an hour, whatever he does, whoever he is. C. S. Lewis Page 2 Other brands and names are the property of their respective owners.

3 Accelerating Design-It s No Longer An Option the path to a competitive advantage The result: Ford* and their supplier network are doing in days what took months They are now spending thousands vs. millions They are more competitive Can you afford not do simulation based design Other brands and names are the property of their respective owners. Page 3

4 Accelerating Design the path to a competitive advantage * * Design directly influences more than 70% of the product life cycle cost companies with high product development effectiveness have earnings three times the average earnings of their competitor. Source: Enhance Engineering: Reduce Time and Optimize Products With Simulation Best Practices June 2013 Other brands and names are the property of their respective owners. Page 4

5 Balance The Key To Delivered Performance Building A Balanced Workstation and Improving Your Experience If Your System Is Slow So Are Your Engineers, Analysts & Designers Storage Graphics Memory Processors Page 5

6 Helping You Help You Optimize Design Quick and easy tool for your customers Determine what workstation may best meet your needs in 4 simple steps Page 6

7 New Software New Hardware SolidWorks Simulation* 2014 software.is substantially faster The Question What Can Happen When You Update Software and Hardware? The Answer Something Amazing Page 7

8 New Software New Hardware SolidWorks Simulation* 2014 software.is substantially faster Coming Soon SolidEdge & Siemens PLM Benchmarks Page 8

9 What Makes A Great Workstation from basic design through advanced simulation +Concurrent interactive design and visualization Intel Xeon Processor E5-2600v2 Product Family +More complex modeling, interactive design and visualization Intel Xeon Processor E5-1600v2 Product Family Trusted, Reliable Performance, Manageability Intel Xeon Processor E v3 Product Family Page 9

10 Intel Technical Computing Transforming How We Access Technology anywhere working, everywhere collaborating 220W/User 65W/User (est.) 21W/User (est.) Source; Intel Engineering Lab Page 10

11 If You Need Help Please Send Me an Intel Xeon Workstation If You Would Like To Talk With Lenovo Please Send Tom An Page 11

12 Legal Disclaimers: Performance Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, Go to: Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmarks or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmarks are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmarks are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. Relative performance is calculated by assigning a baseline value of 1.0 to one benchmark result, and then dividing the actual benchmark result for the baseline platform into each of the specific benchmark results of each of the other platforms, and assigning them a relative performance number that correlates with the performance improvements reported. SPEC, SPECint, SPECfp, SPECrate. SPECpower, SPECjAppServer, SPECjEnterprise, SPECjbb, SPECompM, SPECompL, and SPEC MPI are trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See for more information. TPC Benchmark is a trademark of the Transaction Processing Council. See for more information. SAP and SAP NetWeaver are the registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and in several other countries. See for more information. INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED AS IS. NO LICENSE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY ESTOPPEL OR OTHERWISE, TO ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IS GRANTED BY THIS DOCUMENT. INTEL ASSUMES NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER AND INTEL DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY, RELATING TO THIS INFORMATION INCLUDING LIABILITY OR WARRANTIES RELATING TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, COPYRIGHT OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, reference Page 12 Copyright 2014 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. 12

13 Disclaimers (continued) 1. Peak DP FLOPS claim based on calculated theoretical peak double precision performance capability for a single coprocessor. 16 DP FLOPS/clock/core * 61cores * 1.238GHz = 1.208TeraFlop/s. 2. Memory Bandwidth: 2 socket Intel Xeon processor E product family server vs. Intel Xeon Phi coprocessor (2.2x: Measured by Intel October socket E (8 core, 2.6GHz) vs. 1 Intel Xeon Phi coprocessor SE10P (61 cores, 1.1GHz) on STREAM Triad benchmark 79.5 GB/s vs. 175GB/s ) (TR 2012B) 3. Performance/Watt: 2 socket Intel Xeon processor E server vs. a single Intel Xeon Phi coprocessor SE10P (Intel Measured DGEMM perf/watt score W vs W) (TR 2028B) 13 Page 13 Copyright 2014 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.

14 Risk Factors The above statements and any others in this document that refer to plans and expectations for the second quarter, the year and the future are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Words such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, may, will, should and their variations identify forward-looking statements. Statements that refer to or are based on projections, uncertain events or assumptions also identify forward-looking statements. Many factors could affect Intel s actual results, and variances from Intel s current expectations regarding such factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Intel presently considers the following to be the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the company s expectations. Demand could be different from Intel's expectations due to factors including changes in business and economic conditions; customer acceptance of Intel s and competitors products; supply constraints and other disruptions affecting customers; changes in customer order patterns including order cancellations; and changes in the level of inventory at customers. Uncertainty in global economic and financial conditions poses a risk that consumers and businesses may defer purchases in response to negative financial events, which could negatively affect product demand and other related matters. Intel operates in intensely competitive industries that are characterized by a high percentage of costs that are fixed or difficult to reduce in the short term and product demand that is highly variable and difficult to forecast. Revenue and the gross margin percentage are affected by the timing of Intel product introductions and the demand for and market acceptance of Intel's products; actions taken by Intel's competitors, including product offerings and introductions, marketing programs and pricing pressures and Intel s response to such actions; and Intel s ability to respond quickly to technological developments and to incorporate new features into its products. The gross margin percentage could vary significantly from expectations based on capacity utilization; variations in inventory valuation, including variations related to the timing of qualifying products for sale; changes in revenue levels; segment product mix; the timing and execution of the manufacturing ramp and associated costs; start-up costs; excess or obsolete inventory; changes in unit costs; defects or disruptions in the supply of materials or resources; product manufacturing quality/yields; and impairments of long-lived assets, including manufacturing, assembly/test and intangible assets. Intel's results could be affected by adverse economic, social, political and physical/infrastructure conditions in countries where Intel, its customers or its suppliers operate, including military conflict and other security risks, natural disasters, infrastructure disruptions, health concerns and fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Expenses, particularly certain marketing and compensation expenses, as well as restructuring and asset impairment charges, vary depending on the level of demand for Intel's products and the level of revenue and profits. Intel s results could be affected by the timing of closing of acquisitions and divestitures. Intel s current chief executive officer plans to retire in May 2013 and the Board of Directors is working to choose a successor. The succession and transition process may have a direct and/or indirect effect on the business and operations of the company. In connection with the appointment of the new CEO, the company will seek to retain our executive management team (some of whom are being considered for the CEO position), and keep employees focused on achieving the company s strategic goals and objectives. Intel's results could be affected by adverse effects associated with product defects and errata (deviations from published specifications), and by litigation or regulatory matters involving intellectual property, stockholder, consumer, antitrust, disclosure and other issues, such as the litigation and regulatory matters described in Intel's SEC reports. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages or an injunction prohibiting Intel from manufacturing or selling one or more products, precluding particular business practices, impacting Intel s ability to design its products, or requiring other remedies such as compulsory licensing of intellectual property. A detailed discussion of these and other factors that could affect Intel s results is included in Intel s SEC filings, including the company s most recent Form 10-Q, report on Form 10-K and earnings release. Page 14 Copyright 2014 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.

15 Optimization Notice Intel compilers, associated libraries and associated development tools may include or utilize options that optimize for instruction sets that are available in both Intel and non-intel microprocessors (for example SIMD instruction sets), but do not optimize equally for non-intel microprocessors. In addition, certain compiler options for Intel compilers, including some that are not specific to Intel micro-architecture, are reserved for Intel microprocessors. For a detailed description of Intel compiler options, including the instruction sets and specific microprocessors they implicate, please refer to the Intel Compiler User and Reference Guides under Compiler Options." Many library routines that are part of Intel compiler products are more highly optimized for Intel microprocessors than for other microprocessors. While the compilers and libraries in Intel compiler products offer optimizations for both Intel and Intel-compatible microprocessors, depending on the options you select, your code and other factors, you likely will get extra performance on Intel microprocessors. Intel compilers, associated libraries and associated development tools may or may not optimize to the same degree for non-intel microprocessors for optimizations that are not unique to Intel microprocessors. These optimizations include Intel Streaming SIMD Extensions 2 (Intel SSE2), Intel Streaming SIMD Extensions 3 (Intel SSE3), and Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extensions 3 (Intel SSSE3) instruction sets and other optimizations. Intel does not guarantee the availability, functionality, or effectiveness of any optimization on microprocessors not manufactured by Intel. Microprocessor-dependent optimizations in this product are intended for use with Intel microprocessors. While Intel believes our compilers and libraries are excellent choices to assist in obtaining the best performance on Intel and non-intel microprocessors, Intel recommends that you evaluate other compilers and libraries to determine which best meet your requirements. We hope to win your business by striving to offer the best performance of any compiler or library; please let us know if you find we do not. Notice revision # Page 15 Copyright 2014 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. 15