Can Microtargeting Improve Survey Sampling?
|
|
- Brett Page
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Can Microtargeting Improve Survey Sampling? An Assessment of Accuracy and Bias in Consumer File Marketing Data Josh Pasek University of Michigan NSF / Stanford Conference: Future of Survey Research Project in conjunction with S. Mo Jang, Curtiss Cobb, Charles DiSogra, & J. Michael Dennis
2 Surveys in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities
3 Surveys in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities Declining response rates Increasing costs Coverage challenges (for some modes)
4 Surveys in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities Declining response rates Increasing costs Coverage challenges (for some modes) Pew 2012 Also see: Curtin, Presser, & Singer, 2005
5 Surveys in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities Declining response rates Dual-frame costs (cf. Kennedy, 2007) Increasing costs Increasing refusal as a cost Coverage challenges (for some modes) (cf. Curtin, Presser, & Singer, 2005)
6 Surveys in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities Declining response rates Hispanic & Young Americans (Abraham, Maitland, Bianchi, 2006) Increasing costs Telephone Access Coverage challenges (for some modes) (Blumberg & Luke, 2011)
7 Surveys in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities Declining response rates Increasing costs Increasingly difficult to translate Coverage challenges (for some modes) from respondents to the population
8 Surveys in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities New forms of data New modes of data collection More sophisticated analytical tools
9 Surveys in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities New forms of data Social Media New modes of Mobile phone data data collection Tracking data & Paradata More sophisticated analytical tools Marketing data
10 Surveys in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities New forms of data New modes of Online surveys data collection Behavioral tracking More sophisticated analytical tools
11 Surveys in the 21st Century Challenges and Opportunities New forms of data Better weighting techniques New modes of Matching / propensity scores data collection Imputation More sophisticated analytical tools Machine learning
12 The big question Can the opportunities offset the challenges?
13 The big question Can the opportunities offset the challenges? Can we use new methods for data collection and analysis to help us understand the population?
14 The current exploration Consumer file marketing data
15 Why consumer file marketing data?
16 Why consumer file marketing data? Can be easily purchased
17 Why consumer file marketing data? Can be easily purchased Readily matched to addresses
18 Why consumer file marketing data? Can be easily purchased Readily matched to addresses Provides a rich source of data for all individuals in the sample (not just respondents)
19 Why consumer file marketing data? If the data are high quality:
20 Why consumer file marketing data? If the data are high quality: - Can enable efficient targeted sampling of hard-to-reach groups
21 Why consumer file marketing data? If the data are high quality: - Can enable efficient targeted sampling of hard-to-reach groups - Can provide information on systematic nonresponse
22 Why consumer file marketing data? If the data are high quality: - Can enable efficient targeted sampling of hard-to-reach groups - Can provide information on systematic nonresponse - Might allow corrections for nonresponse and sampling biases
23 Consumer file marketing data as a form of ancillary data Long history in statistics and survey methodology thinking about auxiliary sources of data that could translate between respondents and population (e.g. Deville, Sarndal, & Sautory, 1993; Holt & Smith, 1979; Jagers, Oden, & Trulsson)
24 Consumer file marketing data as a form of ancillary data Long history in statistics and survey methodology thinking about auxiliary sources of data that could translate between respondents and population (e.g. Deville, Sarndal, & Sautory, 1993; Holt & Smith, 1979; Jagers, Oden, & Trulsson) Emerging literature on using individual-level nonsurvey data to correct for errors due to nonresponse (e.g. Boehmke, 2003; Dixon & Tucker, 2010; Groves, 2006; Maitland, Casas-Cordero, & Kreuter, 2009; Kreuter & Olson, 2011; Little & Vartivarian, 2005; Peytchev, 2012; Smith, 2011)
25 Some key initial questions
26 Some key initial questions 1) What are we doing with the data? (supplement or source of inference)
27 Some key initial questions 1) What are we doing with the data? (supplement or source of inference) 2) How accurate are the data?
28 Some key initial questions 1) What are we doing with the data? (supplement or source of inference) 2) How accurate are the data? 3) How complete are the data?
29 Some key initial questions 1) What are we doing with the data? (supplement or source of inference) 2) How accurate are the data? 3) How complete are the data? 4) What model are we using to link the data with the world?
30 Some key initial questions 1) What are we doing with the data? (supplement or source of inference) 2) How accurate are the data? 3) How complete are the data? 4) What model are we using to link the data with the world? 5) How does the model perform for different types of inference?
31 Evaluating consumer file marketing data
32 Evaluating consumer file marketing data Sample
33 Evaluating consumer file marketing data Sample Ancillary Data
34 Evaluating consumer file marketing data Respondents Non-Respondents Sample Ancillary Data
35 The current project
36 The current project (1) Assess the correspondence of ancillary data and self-reports
37 The current project (1) Assess the correspondence of ancillary data and self-reports (2) Evaluate the nature of missingness in ancillary data
38 The current project (1) Assess the correspondence of ancillary data and self-reports (2) Evaluate the nature of missingness in ancillary data (3) Explore whether correctives using ancillary data (i.e. multiple imputations) could produce results that better reflect population parameters
39 Comparison data
40 Comparison data 25,000 households sampled by GfK from USPS Computerized Delivery Sequence File (>95% coverage)
41 Comparison data 25,000 households sampled by GfK from USPS Computerized Delivery Sequence File (>95% coverage) Address-Based Sample recruited via mail in January 2011, respondents were provided with Internet access
42 Comparison data 25,000 households sampled by GfK from USPS Computerized Delivery Sequence File (>95% coverage) Address-Based Sample recruited via mail in January 2011, respondents were provided with Internet access Self-report data from 4472 individuals in 2498 households recruited by GfK to KnowledgePanel AAPOR RR1=10.0%
43 Comparison data 25,000 households sampled by GfK from USPS Computerized Delivery Sequence File (>95% coverage) Address-Based Consumer Sample file data recruited from Marketing via mail in Systems January 2011, respondents Group merged were with provided all sampled with Internet households access 100% matched, data originally from InfoUSA, Experian, and Acxiom Self-report data from 4472 individuals in 2498 households recruited by GfK to KnowledgePanel AAPOR RR1=10.0%
44 Weights 4 sets of household weights: Pure household weight (1 / Rs in HH) Adult household weight (1 / Rs in HH over 18) Best ancillary match weight (1 / R(s) closest to Ancillary age in HH) Best ancillary match weight, full HH only (1 / R(s) closest to Ancillary age in HH for HHs with all respondents present)
45 Weights 4 sets of household weights: Pure household weight (1 / Rs in HH) Adult household weight (1 / Rs in HH over 18) Best ancillary match weight (1 / R(s) closest to Ancillary age in HH) Best ancillary match weight, full HH only (1 / R(s) closest to Ancillary age in HH for HHs with all respondents present)
46 Weights 2 sets of adjustment targets Respondents All Sampled Individuals
47 Weights 2 sets of adjustment targets Respondents Assessments of correspondence and missingness All Sampled Individuals
48 Weights 2 sets of adjustment targets Respondents Assessments of correspondence and missingness All Sampled Individuals Multiple imputations to match sampling frame
49 Weights Which weights we used did not matter for analyses We always used the most contextually appropriate weights for the data presented
50 Measures
51 Measures Home ownership Household income Household size } Household
52 Measures Home ownership Household income Household size Marital status Education Age } } Household Individual ( Head of Household )
53 The current project (1) Assess the correspondence of ancillary data and self-reported estimates (2) Evaluate the nature of missingness in ancillary data (3) Explore whether correctives using ancillary data could produce results that better reflect population parameters
54 (1) Assess the correspondence of ancillary data and self-reported estimates Basic strategy: Assess the proportion of matches between ancillary data and self-reported data for each variable among respondents
55 (1) Assess the correspondence of ancillary data and self-reported estimates Respondents Non-Respondents Sample Ancillary Data
56 Home Ownership Proportion of Households Ancillary Renter Ancillary Owner Renter Owner Self Report
57 Home Ownership Proportion of Households Ancillary Renter Ancillary Owner Renter Owner 88.9% Agreement Self Report
58 Household Income Proportion of Households Difference Between Self Report and Ancillary Estimates
59 Household Income Proportion of Households % Agreement Difference Between Self Report and Ancillary Estimates
60 Household Income Proportion of Households % Far Off Difference Between Self Report and Ancillary Estimates
61 Household Size Proportion of Households Difference Between Self Report and Ancillary Estimates
62 Household Size Proportion of Households % Agreement Difference Between Self Report and Ancillary Estimates
63 Household Size Proportion of Households % Far Off Difference Between Self Report and Ancillary Estimates
64 Marital Status Proportion of Households Ancillary Unmarried Ancillary Married Unmarried Married Self Report
65 Marital Status Proportion of Households Ancillary Unmarried Ancillary Married Unmarried Married 72.3% Agreement Self Report
66 Education Proportion of Households Difference Between Self Report and Ancillary Estimates
67 Education Proportion of Households % Agreement Difference Between Self Report and Ancillary Estimates
68 Education Proportion of Households % Far Off Difference Between Self Report and Ancillary Estimates
69 Age (Biased toward match) Proportion of Households to 2 1 Equal 1 2 to 5 5+ Differences Between Ancillary and Self Report Age in Years
70 Age (Biased toward match) Proportion of Households % Within 1 year 5+ 5 to 2 1 Equal 1 2 to 5 5+ Differences Between Ancillary and Self Report Age in Years
71 Age (Biased toward match) Proportion of Households % > 5 years 5+ 5 to 2 1 Equal 1 2 to 5 5+ Differences Between Ancillary and Self Report Age in Years
72 (1) Assess the correspondence of ancillary data and self-reported estimates Correspondence varies enormously across variables 23% - 89% Considerable discrepancies for all variables
73 The current project (1) Assess the correspondence of ancillary data and self-reported estimates (2) Evaluate the nature of missingness in ancillary data (3) Explore whether correctives using ancillary data could produce results that better reflect population parameters
74 (2) Evaluate the nature of missingness in ancillary data Basic strategy: See if missingness for ancillary measures differs by self-reports of the same variable See how well missingness can be predicted
75 (2) Evaluate the nature of missingness in ancillary data Respondents Non-Respondents Sample Ancillary Data
76 (2) Evaluate the nature of missingness in ancillary data Basic strategy: See if missingness for ancillary measures differs by self-reports of the same variable See how well missingness can be predicted
77 Missingness by Variable Missing Ancillary Data by Variable (N = 2277) Proportion Missing Ancillary Data (%) Home Ownership Household Income Household Size Marital Status Education Age Variable
78 Missingness by Respondent Distribution of Missing Ancillary Data Across Respondents (N = 2277) Proportion of Respondents (%) Number of Variables Missing
79 Home Ownership Distribution of Missing Home Ownership Data by Self Reported Home Ownership Status χ 2 (1, 2274) = 181.4, p<.001 Proportion Missing Ancillary Home Ownership Data (%) Own Rent Self Reported Home Ownership Status
80 Household Income Distribution of Missing Ancillary Income Data by Self Reported Income χ 2 (7, 1661) = 32.5, p<.001 Proportion Missing Ancillary Income Data (%) Self Reported Income Category in Thousands
81 Household Size Distribution of Missing Household Size Data by Self Reported Household Size χ 2 (4, 2274) = 15.15, p<.01 Proportion Missing Ancillary Household Size Data (%) Self Reported Household Size
82 Marital Status Distribution of Missing Marital Data by Self Reported Marital Status χ 2 (1, 2274) = 59.8, p<.001 Proportion Missing Ancillary Marital Data (%) Not Married Married Self Reported Marital Status
83 Education Distribution of Missing Education Data by Self Reported Education χ 2 (4, 1414) = 5.8, p=.21 Proportion Missing Ancillary Education Data (%) Less Than High School 19.2 High School Graduate 20.9 Some College 19.2 College Degree 27.3 Post Graduate Education Self Reported Education Category
84 Education Distribution of Missing Ancillary Age Data by Self Reported Age Proportion Missing Ancillary Age Data (%) χ 2 (6, 2277) = 188.2, p< Self Reported Age Category
85 (2) Evaluate the nature of missingness in ancillary data Basic strategy: See if missingness for ancillary measures differs by self-reports of the same variable See how well missingness can be predicted
86 Predictor Missing Ancillary Data Regressions predicting number of ancillary variables missing (range 0-6) using self-reported demographics
87 Predictor Home ownership Missing Ancillary Data Non-owners*** Regressions predicting number of ancillary variables missing (range 0-6) using self-reported demographics
88 Predictor Home ownership Income Missing Ancillary Data Non-owners*** n.s. Regressions predicting number of ancillary variables missing (range 0-6) using self-reported demographics
89 Predictor Home ownership Income Household size Missing Ancillary Data Non-owners*** n.s. Fewer persons*** Regressions predicting number of ancillary variables missing (range 0-6) using self-reported demographics
90 Predictor Home ownership Income Household size Marital status Missing Ancillary Data Non-owners*** n.s. Fewer persons*** Unmarried* Regressions predicting number of ancillary variables missing (range 0-6) using self-reported demographics
91 Predictor Home ownership Income Household size Marital status Education Missing Ancillary Data Non-owners*** n.s. Fewer persons*** Unmarried* n.s. Regressions predicting number of ancillary variables missing (range 0-6) using self-reported demographics
92 Predictor Home ownership Income Household size Marital status Education Age Missing Ancillary Data Non-owners*** n.s. Fewer persons*** Unmarried* n.s. Younger* Regressions predicting number of ancillary variables missing (range 0-6) using self-reported demographics
93 Predictor Home ownership Income Household size Marital status Education Age Race/ethnicity Missing Ancillary Data Non-owners*** n.s. Fewer persons*** Unmarried* n.s. Younger* n.s. Regressions predicting number of ancillary variables missing (range 0-6) using self-reported demographics
94 Predictor Home ownership Income Household size Marital status Education Age Race/ethnicity Missing Ancillary Data Non-owners*** n.s. Fewer persons*** Unmarried* n.s. Younger* n.s. R-squared 0.11 Regressions predicting number of ancillary variables missing (range 0-6) using self-reported demographics
95 Predictor Home ownership Income Missing Ancillary Data Non-owners*** n.s. Household size Fewer persons*** Missingness in ancillary data Marital status Education Unmarried* was not well accounted for n.s. Age Race/ethnicity Younger* n.s. R-squared 0.11 Regressions predicting number of ancillary variables missing (range 0-6) using self-reported demographics
96 (2) Evaluate the nature of missingness in ancillary data Missing ancillary data appears to be nonignorable and biased
97 The current project (1) Assess the correspondence of ancillary data and self-reported estimates (2) Evaluate the nature of missingness in ancillary data (3) Explore whether correctives using ancillary data could produce results that better reflect population parameters
98 (3) Explore whether correctives using ancillary data could produce results that better reflect population parameters Basic strategy: Impute the distribution of self-reports for all sampled individuals based on the ancillary data See if that represents a substantive improvement over the self-reports of respondents alone (cf. Peytchev 2012)
99 (3) Explore whether correctives using ancillary data could produce results that better reflect population parameters Respondents Non-Respondents Sample Ancillary Data
100 Analytical strategy - Impute self-reports for entire sample (not just respondents) - Compare imputed, raw self-report, and ancillary values to CPS
101 Measures Used in Imputations Home ownership Presence of telephone Number of persons in household Household income Marital status Education of head of household Age of head of household Number of children in household Hispanic status Region
102 The imputations 100 imputed datasets were created using MICE (multiple imputation via chained equations) Point estimates were generated for all imputed datasets as well as for raw self-reports, ancillary data, and CPS
103 Home ownership Home Ownership Estimates Weighted By Household Proportion MIs Raw GfK Estimate CPS Estimate Ancillary Estimate
104 Household Income Income Category Estimates Weighted By Household Proportion MIs Raw GfK Estimate CPS Estimate Ancillary Estimate Less than $15k $15k 25k $25k 35k $35k 50k $50k 75k $75k 100k $100k 150k More than $150k Household Income Category
105 Household size Household Size Estimates Weighted By Household Proportion MIs Raw GfK Estimate CPS Estimate Ancillary Estimate or more Persons in Household
106 Marital Status Marital Status Estimates Weighted By Individual Proportion MIs Raw GfK Estimate CPS Estimate Ancillary Estimate
107 Education Education Level Estimates Weighted By Individual Proportion MIs Raw GfK Estimate CPS Estimate Ancillary Estimate Less than HS HS Grad Some College College Grad Grad School Education Level
108 Age Age Category Estimates Weighted By Individual Proportion MIs Raw GfK Estimate CPS Estimate Ancillary Estimate and up Age Category
109 Differences from CPS Average Absolute Difference From CPS By Method And Variable Imputation Mean Raw GfK Estimate Ancillary Estimate Home Ownership Income Household Size Marital Status Education Age Average
110 Differences from CPS Data Household Individual Total Imputed mean 2.7% 3.3% 3.0% Raw self-report 4.0% 6.5% 5.3% Ancillary 7.5% 12.7% 10.1%
111 Differences from CPS Data Household Individual Total Imputed mean 2.7% 3.3% 3.0% Raw self-report 4.0% 6.5% 5.3% Ancillary 7.5% 12.7% 10.1% Imputations were better than raw selfreports, but not by an enormous amount
112 Distilling these results
113 Distilling these results Estimates from the raw self-report data (unweighted) were not very far off
114 Distilling these results Estimates from the raw self-report data (unweighted) were not very far off Imputations based on ancillary data eliminated a moderate portion of the error in the self-reports
115 Distilling these results Estimates from the raw self-report data (unweighted) were not very far off Imputations based on ancillary data eliminated a moderate portion of the error in the self-reports Ancillary data themselves do not seem particularly accurate
116 Across all analyses
117 Across all analyses Ancillary data estimates frequently differ from self-reports
118 Across all analyses Ancillary data estimates frequently differ from self-reports Missing ancillary data is systematic and appears to be non-ignorable
119 Across all analyses Ancillary data estimates frequently differ from self-reports Missing ancillary data is systematic and appears to be non-ignorable Standard Bayesian imputation algorithms do not fully correct biases
120 Using consumer file marketing data
121 Using consumer file marketing data Ancillary data may help identify members of hard-to-reach populations (possibly with bias)
122 Using consumer file marketing data Ancillary data may help identify members of hard-to-reach populations (possibly with bias) Ancillary data do not seem to be particularly efficient when correcting for non-response
123 Using consumer file marketing data Ancillary data may help identify members of hard-to-reach populations (possibly with bias) Ancillary data do not seem to be particularly efficient when correcting for non-response Unlikely that it would be possible to use these data to correct for a problematic sampling frame
124 What went wrong?
125 What went wrong? We can t know...
126 What went wrong? We can t know... The data are complete black boxes Proprietary
127 Moving forward from here Still lots of reasons to think that good ancillary data would substantively improve survey sampling But the demographic ancillary data used in this study were not sufficient for many purposes
128 Moving forward with current data
129 Moving forward with current data How do these results compare with traditional survey weighting techniques?
130 Moving forward with current data How do these results compare with traditional survey weighting techniques? Could a larger set of ancillary measures allow for better correctives?
131 Moving forward with current data How do these results compare with traditional survey weighting techniques? Could a larger set of ancillary measures allow for better correctives? Could linking other types of newly available data allow for better translations between respondents and society?
132 Ideally, we want data we can trust and evaluate
133 Ideally, we want data we can trust and evaluate The ancillary data need to be more transparent
134 Ideally, we want data we can trust and evaluate The ancillary data need to be more transparent The process of linking sources of data to oneanother needs to be more systematically addressed
135 Ideally, we want data we can trust and evaluate The ancillary data need to be more transparent The process of linking sources of data to oneanother needs to be more systematically addressed Is there an in-house option that could be used instead of purchasing data from corporations?
136 Ideally, we want data we can trust and evaluate The ancillary data need to be more transparent The process of linking sources of data to oneanother needs to be more systematically addressed Is there an in-house option that could be used instead of purchasing data from corporations? NSF can play a pivotal role in building such a dataset
137 Need to consider these questions with additional sources of data 1) What are we doing with the data? (supplement or source of inference) 2) How accurate are the data? 3) How complete are the data? 4) What model are we using to link the data with the world? 5) How does the model perform for different types of inference?
138 Can Microtargeting Improve Survey Sampling? An Assessment of Accuracy and Bias in Consumer File Marketing Data Josh Pasek University of Michigan NSF / Stanford Conference: Future of Survey Research Project in conjunction with S. Mo Jang, Curtiss Cobb, Charles DiSogra, & J. Michael Dennis
Characteristics of the Population of Internet Panel Members
Vol. 10, Issue 4, 2017 Characteristics of the Population of Internet Panel Members John M Boyle *, Ronaldo Iachan, Naomi Freedner- Maguire, Tala H Fakhouri ** * Institution: ICF Institution: ICF Institution:
More informationCharacteristics of the Population of Internet Panel Members
Vol. 10, Issue 4, 2017 Characteristics of the Population of Internet Panel Members John M Boyle 1, Ronaldo Iachan 2, Naomi Freedner- Maguire 3, Tala H Fakhouri 4 Survey Practice 10.29115/SP-2017-0025 Oct
More informationMeasuring the Correlates of Intent to Participate and Participation in the Census and Trends in These Correlates:
Measuring the Correlates of Intent to Participate and Participation in the Census and Trends in These Correlates: Comparisons of RDD Telephone and Non-probability Sample Internet Survey Data Josh Pasek
More informationTaking Surveys to People s Technology: Implications for Federal Statistics and Social Science Research
Taking Surveys to People s Technology: Implications for Federal Statistics and Social Science Research Discussion Courtney Kennedy Director, Survey Research ckennedy@pewresearch.org A timely study 91%
More informationSample: n=2,252 people age 16 or older nationwide, including 1,125 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:
Survey questions Library Services Survey Final Topline 11/14/2012 Data for October 15 November 10, 2012 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American
More informationNUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 8, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 8, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Kristen Purcell, Research Consultant Lee Rainie, Director, Internet, Science and Technology
More informationUnderstanding People. Sample Matching
Understanding People Sample Matching Sample Matching Representative Sampling from Internet Panels A white paper on the advantages of the sample matching methodology by Douglas Rivers, Ph.D. - founder;
More informationIntroduction to Survey Data Analysis
Introduction to Survey Data Analysis Young Cho at Chicago 1 The Circle of Research Process Theory Evaluation Real World Theory Hypotheses Test Hypotheses Data Collection Sample Operationalization/ Measurement
More informationIssues in Applying Adaptive Design to Establishment Surveys
Issues in Applying Adaptive Design to Establishment Surveys Jaki S. McCarthy US Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service The 6th International Workshop on Internet Survey and
More informationRecent Developments in Assessing and Mitigating Nonresponse Bias
Recent Developments in Assessing and Mitigating Nonresponse Bias Joanna Fane Lineback and Eric B. Fink 1 U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. 20233 Abstract In this paper, we address recent developments
More informationIntroduction to Survey Data Analysis. Focus of the Seminar. When analyzing survey data... Young Ik Cho, PhD. Survey Research Laboratory
Introduction to Survey Data Analysis Young Ik Cho, PhD Research Assistant Professor University of Illinois at Chicago Fall 2008 Focus of the Seminar Data Cleaning/Missing Data Sampling Bias Reduction When
More informationDoes giving people their preferred survey mode actually increase survey participation rates? An Experimental Examination
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2012 Does giving people their preferred survey mode
More informationDATA MEMO. The average American internet user is not sure what podcasting is, what an RSS feed does, or what the term phishing means
DATA MEMO BY: PIP Director Lee Rainie (202-419-4500) DATE: July 2005 The average American internet user is not sure what podcasting is, what an RSS feed does, or what the term phishing means Large numbers
More informationAddress Based Sampling: Census Block Group Data Used to Define Incentive Structure
Address Based Sampling: Census Block Group Data Used to Define Structure Anh Thu Burks 1 & Michael W. Link 2 1 The Nielsen Company, 501 Brooker Creek, Oldsmar, FL 34677 2 The Nielsen Company, 1145 Sanctuary
More informationMODELING A PROBABILITY SAMPLE? AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLE MATCHING FOR AN INTERNET MEASUREMENT PANEL
MODELING A PROBABILITY SAMPLE? AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLE MATCHING FOR AN INTERNET MEASUREMENT PANEL Lukasz Chmura, Douglas Rivers, Delia Bailey, Christine Pierce, Scott Bell 05/03/2013 SAMPLE MATCHING WHAT
More informationIntroduction to Survey Data Analysis. Linda K. Owens, PhD. Assistant Director for Sampling & Analysis
Introduction to Survey Data Analysis Linda K. Owens, PhD Assistant Director for Sampling & Analysis General information Please hold questions until the end of the presentation Slides available at www.srl.uic.edu/seminars/fall15seminars.htm
More information1. Understand & evaluate survey. What is survey data? When analyzing survey data... General information. Focus of the webinar
What is survey data? Introduction to Survey Data Analysis Linda K. Owens, PhD Assistant Director for Sampling & Analysis Data gathered from a sample of individuals Sample is random (drawn using probabilistic
More informationCalibrating Non-Probability Internet Samples with Probability Samples Using Early Adopter Characteristics
Calibrating Non-Probability Internet Samples with Probability Samples Using Early Adopter Characteristics Charles DiSogra, Curtiss Cobb, Elisa Chan, J. Michael Dennis Knowledge Networks, 2100 Geng Road,
More information1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER
1 Methodology This report is drawn from a survey conducted as part of the American Trends Panel (ATP), a nationally representative panel of randomly selected U.S. adults living in households recruited
More informationGUIDE. Digital audiences for precise targeting
GUIDE Digital audiences for precise targeting Demographics Industry leading insight into the consumer population Reach demographic-based audiences from industry leading ConsumerView SM database Leverage
More informationUsing Weights in the Analysis of Survey Data
Using Weights in the Analysis of Survey Data David R. Johnson Department of Sociology Population Research Institute The Pennsylvania State University November 2008 What is a Survey Weight? A value assigned
More informationMode and Address Frame Alternatives to Random-Digit Dialing
Mode and Address Frame Alternatives to Random-Digit Dialing Michael W. Link* 1, Michael P. Battaglia 2, Martin R. Frankel 3, Larry Osborn 2, and Ali H. Mokdad 1 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
More informationDigital Divisions. There are clear differences among those with broadband connections, dial-up connections, and no connections at all to the internet.
Digital Divisions There are clear differences among those with broadband connections, dial-up connections, and no connections at all to the internet. October 5, 2005 Susannah Fox, Associate Director PEW
More informationIs the Public Willing to Pay to Help Fix Climate Change?
Is the Public Willing to Pay to Help Fix Climate Change? Conducted by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research With funding from The Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago
More informationIntroduction to Sample Surveys
Introduction to Sample Surveys Statistics 331 Kirk Wolter September 26, 2016 1 Outline A. What are sample surveys? B. Main steps in a sample survey C. Limitations/Errors in survey data September 26, 2016
More informationStatistical Challenges in Combining Information from Big and Small Data Sources
Statistical Challenges in Combining Information from Big and Small Data Sources Trivellore Raghunathan Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research University of Michigan Ann Arbor, 48106 Abstract
More informationThe Nature of Nonresponse in a Medicaid Survey: Causes and Consequences
Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2005, pp. 73 87 The Nature of Nonresponse in a Medicaid Survey: Causes and Consequences Patricia M. Gallagher 1, Floyd Jackson Fowler Jr. 1, and Vickie L.
More informationCompeting Goals of Responsive Design in a Total Survey Error Framework: Minimization of Cost, Nonresponse Rates, Bias, and Variance
Competing Goals of Responsive Design in a Total Survey Error Framework: Minimization of Cost, Nonresponse Rates, Bias, and Variance Andy Peytchev International Total Survey Error Workshop August 2, 2012
More informationA Possible Data Future for the Observational Social Sciences. Robert M. Groves US Census Bureau November 2, 2011
A Possible Data Future for the Observational Social Sciences Robert M. Groves US Census Bureau November 2, 2011 5 Observations 1. The difficulties of measuring the busy, diverse, and independent American
More informationPrepared by: Chintan Turakhia, Jonathan Best, and Jennifer Su 1 Braxton Way Suite 125 Glen Mills, PA 19342
Methods Report for Vanderbilt University s: Tennessee Horserace Poll 2018 S urvey of TN Registered Voters Age 18+ October 16, 2018 Prepared by: Chintan Turakhia, Jonathan Best, and Jennifer Su 1 Braxton
More informationUse of a nonresponse follow-up survey to assess the validity of R-indicators as a measure of the risk of bias
Use of a nonresponse follow-up survey to assess the validity of R-indicators as a measure of the risk of bias Caroline Vandenplas 1, Caroline Roberts 1 and Michèle Ernst Staehli 2 1 University of Lausanne,
More informationTarget Populations, Sampling Frames, and Coverage Error. Professor Ron Fricker Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California
Target Populations, Sampling Frames, and Coverage Error Professor Ron Fricker Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 1 Goals for this Lecture Define survey sampling terms, including Target population,
More informationIntroduction to Part I
Part I COVERAGE Introduction to Part I Mario Callegaro a and Jon A. Krosnick b a Google UK b Stanford University, USA I.1 Coverage bias in online panels From a survey methodology point of view, coverage
More informationDealing with Missing Data: Strategies for Beginners to Data Analysis
Dealing with Missing Data: Strategies for Beginners to Data Analysis Rachel Margolis, PhD Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology Center for Population, Aging, and Health University of Western Ontario
More informationSensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models for. Longitudinal Data That Are Incomplete
ABSTRACT Sensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data That Are Incomplete Shelley A. Blozis, University of California, Davis, CA Appropriate applications of methods for
More informationStatistical Design and Estimation taking account of Quality
Statistical Design and Estimation taking account of Quality Chris Skinner NTTS, 23 February 2011 Quality Quality as accuracy Aim: quality improvement 2 Quality Context despite increasing threats to quality
More informationPrepared by: Chintan Turakhia, Jonathan Best, and Jennifer Su 1 Braxton Way Suite 125 Glen Mills, PA 19342
Methods Report for Vanderbilt University s: Tennessee Poll Spring 2018 S u r v e y o f T N R e g i s t e r e d V o t e r s A g e 1 8 + M a y 1 0, 2 0 1 8 Prepared by: Chintan Turakhia, Jonathan Best, and
More informationDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY
Bank, Restaurant or Retail DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY Skokie Boulevard Northbrook, IL contact: STEVEN BAER 847.412.9898 sbaer@metrocre.com 56 Skokie Valley Road n Highland Park, IL 60035 n 847.412.9898 main
More informationmajority, plurality Polls are not perfect Margin of error Margin of error
349 Polls and surveys Reporting on public opinion research requires rigorous inspection of a poll s methodology, provenance and results. The mere existence of a poll is not enough to make it news. Do not
More informationSurvey Report Community Newspaper Readership Survey [National Newspaper Association]
Survey Report 2012 Community Newspaper Readership Survey [National Newspaper Association] Center for Advanced Social Research The Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute School of Journalism University
More informationMeasuring Consumer Cash Holdings: Lessons from the 2013 Bank of Canada Methods-of- Payment Survey
Vol. 9, Issue 4, 2016 Measuring Consumer Cash Holdings: Lessons from the 2013 Bank of Canada Methods-of- Payment Survey Heng Chen 1, Chris Henry 2, Kim P. Huynh 3, Q. Rallye Shen 4, Kyle Vincent 5 Survey
More informationNATIONAL SURVEY A Survey of Likely Voters October 2, 2014
NATIONAL SURVEY A Survey of Likely Voters October 2, 2014 Sample Size : 1,000 Gender Men 48% Women 52% 1. Starting out, are you registered to vote at your current address? Yes 100% 2. I know it s still
More informationNIELSEN P$YCLE METHODOLOGY
NIELSEN P$YCLE METHODOLOGY May 2014 PRIZM and P$ycle are registered trademarks of The Nielsen Company (US), LLC Nielsen and the Nielsen logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of CZT/ACN Trademarks,
More informationThe Buying Behavior of Substantial Minorities of Public Is Influenced by Environmental Attitudes If the Price is Right
Press Contact: Corporate Communications Harris Interactive, Inc. 212-539-9600 press@harrisinteractive.net The Buying Behavior of Substantial Minorities of Public Is Influenced by Environmental Attitudes
More informationMixing Survey Modes: Why do it and What are the Consequences?
Mixing Survey Modes: Why do it and What are the Consequences? Prof dr Edith D. de Leeuw Share Survey Modes Workshop Mannheim, 8 July 2009 Copyright Edith D. de Leeuw Modes of Data Collection Interviewer-administered
More informationTHE TRANSITION FROM DIARY-BASED TO SMARTPHONE-BASED TRAVEL SURVEY DATA: IMPLICATIONS FOR TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING
THE TRANSITION FROM DIARY-BASED TO SMARTPHONE-BASED TRAVEL SURVEY DATA: IMPLICATIONS FOR TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING 0 0 0 Mark Bradley RSG Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 000 Tel: --; Fax: 0--00; E-mail:
More informationImproving the Representativeness of Online Surveys
Improving the Representativeness of Online Surveys Jeffrey Henning Researchscape International Event Sponsors Total Survey Error Respondent Selection Issues Sampling Error Response Accuracy Issues Coverage
More informationMixed Mode Surveys in Business Research: A Natural Experiment. Dr Andrew Engeli March 14 th 2018
Mixed Mode Surveys in Business Research: A Natural Experiment Dr Andrew Engeli March 14 th 2018 Structure of todays presentation The general context The natural experiment Resources Conclusion Coverage
More informationJohannes W.S. Kappelhof 1
Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jos-2015-0001 Face-to-Face or Sequential Mixed-Mode Surveys Among Non-Western Minorities in the Netherlands: The
More informationWhat Have We Learned About Surveys?
What Have We Learned About Email Surveys? Dulane Moran, Research Into Action, Portland, OR April Armstrong, Research Into Action, Portland, OR Jun Suzuki, Research Into Action, Portland, OR ABSTRACT This
More informationFor Lease The Village
For Lease The Village Grant St. & 37th Ave. Gary, IN AVAILABLE 50,000-80,000 SF BIG BOX DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY GROSS LEASEABLE AREA 304,725 SF ZONING B5-1 Business District PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Grocery
More informationResponsiveness and Representativeness in an Establishment Survey of Manufacturers
Responsiveness and Representativeness in an Establishment Survey of Manufacturers Eric B. Fink Joanna Fane Lineback October 2, 2014 2014 International Total Survey Error Workshop Any views expressed are
More informationAgency Information Collection Activities: Request for Comments for Periodic Information Collection
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Docket No. FHWA-2015-0004 This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/19/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-03462,
More informationAssessing the quality of integrated data (ESSnet on quality of multisource statistics)
Assessing the quality of integrated data (ESSnet on quality of multisource statistics) Sorina Vâju, European Commission Summary 1. Problem statement quality in a multisource environment 2. ESS.VIP ADMIN
More informationOnline Gardening Search Activities and Purchases 1
Online Gardening Search Activities and Purchases 1 Bridget K. Behe 2, Brittany Harte 3, and Chengyan Yue 4 Department of Horticulture Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 Abstract Consumers
More informationGUIDELINES FOR PAID SUPPLEMENTS TO THE GSS
GUIDELINES FOR PAID SUPPLEMENTS TO THE GSS The General Social Survey (GSS) project regularly includes topical modules developed by investigators and research groups in the user community, supported by
More informationSurvey of Income and Program Participation 2001 Wave 8 Food Security Data File Technical Documentation and User Notes
Survey of Income and Program Participation 2001 Wave 8 Food Security Data File Technical Documentation and User Notes Questions: Contact Mark Nord Phone: 202-694-5433 Email: marknord@ers.usda.gov. Revision
More informationMICHIGAN CONSUMER MEDIA RESEARCH STUDY. Scarborough 2013
MICHIGAN CONSUMER MEDIA RESEARCH STUDY Scarborough 2013 THE RESEARCH The market research study consists of 1,000 interviews from adults in Michigan. 850 interviews were conducted on a random-digit dial
More informationWISCONSIN CONSUMER MEDIA USAGE RESEARCH STUDY. Scarborough 2013
CONSUMER MEDIA USAGE RESEARCH STUDY Scarborough 2013 THE RESEARCH The market research study consists of 1,000 interviews from adults in Wisconsin. 850 interviews were conducted on a random-digit dial basis
More informationMobile Banking as a Mechanism to Increase Access to Financial Services
Pepperdine University Pepperdine Digital Commons School of Public Policy Working Papers School of Public Policy 10-17-2017 Mobile Banking as a Mechanism to Increase Access to Financial Services Luisa Blanco
More informationTHE NEW WORKER-EMPLOYER CHARACTERISTICS DATABASE 1
THE NEW WORKER-EMPLOYER CHARACTERISTICS DATABASE 1 Kimberly Bayard, U.S. Census Bureau; Judith Hellerstein, University of Maryland and NBER; David Neumark, Michigan State University and NBER; Kenneth R.
More informationCan Web and Mail Survey Modes Improve Participation in an RDD-based National Health Surveillance?
Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2006, pp. 293 312 Can Web and Mail Survey Modes Improve Participation in an RDD-based National Health Surveillance? Michael W. Link and Ali Mokdad 1 Participation
More informationThe National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation Cell Phone and Debit Card Test A Cost -Benefit Analysis
The National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation Cell Phone and Debit Card Test A Cost -Benefit Analysis Aniekan Okon Elke Mclaren Denise Pepe U.S. Census Bureau March 16, 2012
More informationA Taxonomy for Test Oracles
A Taxonomy for Test Oracles Quality Week 98 Douglas Hoffman Software Quality Methods, LLC. 24646 Heather Heights Place Saratoga, California 95070-9710 Phone 408-741-4830 Fax 408-867-4550 Copyright 1998,
More informationESOMAR 28 ANSWERS TO 28 QUESTIONS TO HELP BUYERS OF ONLINE SAMPLE
ESOMAR 28 ANSWERS TO 28 QUESTIONS TO HELP BUYERS OF ONLINE SAMPLE 2016 ESOMAR 28 COMPANY PROFILE 1. What experience does your company have in providing online samples for market research? Context: This
More informationBY Cary Funk and Brian Kennedy 1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER. FOR RELEASE MAY 16, 2017 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:
1 FOR RELEASE MAY 16, BY Cary Funk and Brian Kennedy FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Lee Rainie, Director, Internet, Science and Technology Research Cary Funk, Associate Director, Research Dana Page, Senior
More informationDepartment of Sociology King s University College Sociology 302b: Section 570/571 Research Methodology in Empirical Sociology Winter 2006
Department of Sociology King s University College Sociology 302b: Section 570/571 Research Methodology in Empirical Sociology Winter 2006 Computer assignment #3 DUE Wednesday MARCH 29 th (in class) Regression
More information18 Appendix A: Survey Methodology
2017 JUST Capital Ranking Methodology 18 Appendix A: Survey Methodology Copyright 2017 JUST Capital Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix A: Survey Methodology TECHNICAL OVERVIEW OF THE AMERISPEAK
More informationPUTTING YOUR SEGMENTATION WHERE IT BELONGS Implementation Tactics for Taking your Segmentation off the Bookshelf and into the Marketplace
Putting your Segmentation Where it Belongs 1 PUTTING YOUR SEGMENTATION WHERE IT BELONGS Implementation Tactics for Taking your Segmentation off the Bookshelf and into the Marketplace For many firms, market
More informationTreating Nonresponse in the Canadian National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (NLSCY)
Treating Nonresponse in the Canadian National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (NLSCY) An Evolution Over 6 Cycles Marcelle Tremblay ICCCS 2006, Oxford UK September 13, 2006 Talk Outline Treating
More information2018 Census data quality management strategy
2018 Census data quality management strategy Crown copyright See Copyright and terms of use for our copyright, attribution, and liability statements. Citation Stats NZ (2017). 2018 Census data quality
More informationA Note on Sex, Geographic Mobility, and Career Advancement. By: William T. Markham, Patrick O. Macken, Charles M. Bonjean, Judy Corder
A Note on Sex, Geographic Mobility, and Career Advancement By: William T. Markham, Patrick O. Macken, Charles M. Bonjean, Judy Corder This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted
More informationCentral banks use of and interest in big data Session 1: Big Data for Central Banks
Central banks use of and interest in big data Session 1: Big Data for Central Banks Jens Mehrhoff*, currently on secondment to the European Commission * Jens This Mehrhoff, presentation Deutsche represents
More informationAnnamaria Bianchi 1 & Barry Schouten 2
Annamaria Bianchi 1 & Barry Schouten 2 1 DSAEMQ - University of Bergamo, Italy 2 Statistics Netherlands & Utrecht University 15 June 2017 What are Adaptive Survey Designs? Ingredients Web mode as a possible
More informationSENSORY EVALUATION TECHNIQUES DO S & DON TS
SENSORY EVALUATION TECHNIQUES DO S & DON TS Sitaram Dixit Corporate Manager Fragrances S. H. Kelkar & Company P. Ltd. INTRODUCTION Sensory evaluation done to differentiate the fragrance character between
More informationBlogger Callback Survey Final Revised Topline 7/6/06
Blogger Callback Survey Final Revised Topline 7/6/06 Data for July 5, 2005 February 17, 2006 1 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Internet & American Life Project Sample: n
More informationAn Evaluation of the SMART Paratransit Phone Reservation System
An Evaluation of the SMART Paratransit Phone Reservation System Presented at the 1998 ITS America Annual Meeting Thomas B. Reed Assistant Research Scientist, ITS Research Laboratory 215 Engineering Programs
More informationthe wellbeing agenda and the IDI
NZGSS User Needs: the wellbeing agenda and the IDI Conal Smith August 2018 NZGSS user needs: the wellbeing agenda and the IDI 1 NZGSS USER NEEDS: THE WELLBEING AGENDA AND THE IDI Purpose This note discusses
More informationChapter URL:
This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The Measurement of Labor Cost Volume Author/Editor: Jack E. Triplett, ed. Volume Publisher:
More informationTHE TURN TO ADDRESS-BASED SAMPLING
THE TURN TO ADDRESS-BASED SAMPLING JANUARY 2019 1 INTRODUCTION Address based sampling (ABS) has been around for some time. For the past decade, the U.S. Postal Service has made available to approved vendors
More informationMulti-Touch Attribution
Multi-Touch Attribution BY DIRK BEYER HEAD OF SCIENCE, MARKETING ANALYTICS NEUSTAR A Guide to Methods, Math and Meaning Introduction Marketers today use multiple marketing channels that generate impression-level
More informationQuestions and Answers about SPILLOVER: NEGATIVE IMPACTS A Sloan Work and Family Research Network Fact Sheet
Questions and Answers about SPILLOVER: NEGATIVE IMPACTS A Sloan Work and Family Research Network Fact Sheet Introduction The Sloan Work and Family Research Network has prepared Fact Sheets that provide
More informationA Study of the Impact of Synthetic Data Generation Techniques on Data Utility using the 1991 UK Samples of Anonymised Records
A Study of the Impact of Synthetic Data Generation Techniques on Data Utility using the 1991 UK Samples of Anonymised Records Jennifer Taub Mark Elliot Joseph Sakshaug Motivations for this Study To provide
More informationEffects of Differential Branding on Survey Materials
Effects of Differential Branding on Survey Materials Nicole Bensky, Gretchen Grabowski, Justin Bailey, Chuck Shuttles, Michael Link, PhD. 1 1 The Nielsen Company, 501 Brooker Creek Blvd., Oldsmar, FL 34677
More informationUnderstanding Customer Differences
CHAPTER 2 Understanding Customer Differences E-Customer Relationship Management Objectives Describes a basic view of market segmentation Identifying Customer Differences Views of Customer Organizations
More informationIssues in data quality and comparability in EU-SILC Vijay Verma University of Siena
Comparative EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions: Issues and Challenges Eurostat and Statistics Finland Conference. Helsinki, 6-7 November, 2006. Issues in data quality and comparability in EU-SILC
More information2014 Survey of Residential Electric Customer Interest in Value-Added Products and Services
STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE THREE EMPIRE STATE PLAZA, ALBANY, NY 12223-1350 www.dps.ny.gov PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AUDREY ZIBELMAN Chair PATRICIA L. ACAMPORA GARRY A. BROWN GREGG C.
More informationAn overview of methods for treating selectivity in big data sources
An overview of methods for treating selectivity in big data sources MACIEJ BERĘSEWICZ, RISTO LEHTONEN, FERNANDO REIS, LOREDANA DI CONSIGLIO, MARTIN KARLBERG 2018 edition STATISTICAL WORKING PAPERS BOOKS
More informationThe Power of Shared Data Consortiums
The Power of Shared Data Consortiums INFORMS New York April 14, 2010 Lee Russo IXI Corporation, an Equifax Company www.ixicorp.com Summary Through the pooling of data, data consortiums or exchanges, can
More informationTapestry Segmentation: Methodology. An Esri White Paper May 2017
Tapestry Segmentation: Methodology An Esri White Paper May 2017 Copyright 2017 Esri All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. The information contained in this document is the exclusive
More informationWork Environment Index New Mexico and Neighboring States
Work Environment Index New Mexico and Neighboring States March 2006 Introduction The Work Environment Index, developed by the Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts at
More informationValue Proposition for Financial Institutions
WWW.CUSTOMERS-DNA.COM VALUE PROPOSITION FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Value Proposition for Financial Institutions Customer Intelligence in Banking CRM & CUSTOMER INTELLIGENCE SERVICES INFO@CUSTOMERS-DNA.COM
More informationAppendix D: Nonresponse Analysis
Nonresponse in the O*NET Data Collection Program can occur from any of three sources. Establishments can cause nonresponse when they fail to participate at the verification, screening, recruiting, or sampling
More informationTwo Applications of Respondent Driven Sampling: Ethnic Minorities and Illicit Substance Users
Two Applications of Respondent Driven Sampling: Ethnic Minorities and Illicit Substance Users Sunghee Lee, Ai Rene Ong, Michael Elliott University of Michigan Workshop on Improving Health Research for
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, October 22, Modest Support for Cap and Trade Policy FEWER AMERICANS SEE SOLID EVIDENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING
NEWS Release 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 Tel (202) 419-4350 Fax (202) 419-4399 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Modest Support for Cap and Trade Policy FEWER
More informationMichael D. Larsen, The George Washington University Department of Statistics Dirksen Building, Room SD /10/12; 2-3:30pm
Michael D. Larsen, The George Washington University Department of Statistics Dirksen Building, Room SD 562 10/10/12; 2-3:30pm Outline In the news Steps in the survey process Sampling variability Non sampling
More informationWho Calls for Help? Statistical evidence of disparities in citizen-government interactions using geo-spatial survey and 311 data from Kansas City
Who Calls for Help? Statistical evidence of disparities in citizen-government interactions using geo-spatial survey and 311 data from Kansas City Constantine E. Kontokosta, PhD New York University Tandon
More information1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER
1 Methodology The analysis in this report is based on telephone interviews conducted Jan. 8-Feb. 7, 2019, among a national sample of 1,502 adults, 18 years of age or older, living in all 50 U.S. states
More informationEnergy consumption surveys and end uses estimation in the U.S. EIA
Energy consumption surveys and end uses estimation in the U.S. EIA For InterEnerStat Workshop: Energy efficiency and end-use data Paris, France By Eileen M. O Brien, Team Lead, Buildings Surveys Statistics
More informationThe Value of a Total Market Approach
The Value of a Total Market Approach Key Insights for Marketing to the Black Consumer Segment By Dorinda Walker Director, Multicultural Marketing, Prudential Financial, Inc. The statistics are clear. The
More information