ZIRLO TM Irradiation Creep Stress Dependence in Compression and Tension 16 th ASTM Zirconium Symposium Chengdu, China, 9-12 May 2010

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ZIRLO TM Irradiation Creep Stress Dependence in Compression and Tension 16 th ASTM Zirconium Symposium Chengdu, China, 9-12 May 2010"

Transcription

1 ZIRLO TM Irradiation Creep Stress Dependence in Compression and Tension 16 th ASTM Zirconium Symposium Chengdu, China, 9-12 May 2010 John Foster and Rita Baranwal Westinghouse Electric Company LLC Columbia, SC, USA Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Information Class Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights reserved 1

2 INTRODUCTION Data are from the Vogtle Unit 2 PWR Creep/Growth Program Results for SRA ZIRLO show: In-reactor creep compliance is the same in tension and compression If total in-reactor strain is split into growth and creep components: Deviatoric hoop stress is the driving force for irradiation creep Irradiation creep in tension is the same as compression 2

3 EXPERIMENTAL Test Samples SRA ZIRLO 168 mm long Samples are either He pressurized or open on both sides to water 3

4 Irradiation Schedule Cycle: Fall 02 Spring 04 Fall 05 Spring 07 Fall 08 Spring 10 Assembly A1 x x A2 x x A3 x x A4 x x A5 x x A6 x x 4

5 Test Overview Test samples are irradiated in guide thimble positions using segmented insert rods Test samples do not contain fuel Samples are placed in outer row guide thimble positions Six assemblies Samples discharged for measurement are not reinserted Disassemble samples by shearing after the refueling outage in the pool and shipped to Hot Cell for examination Measured by laser micrometer 5

6 Irradiation Conditions Data are available for 1 and 2 cycles (~17 months irradiation/cycle) Temperature range o C No axial or radial fast flux gradient Confirmed with retrospective dosimetry measurements Cycle-to-cycle fast fluxes are approximately constant Range between x10 13 n/cm 2 -sec E>1 MeV 6

7 Stress Analysis σ θ, σ r and σ z stresses calculated with the thick-wall equations Deviatoric hoop stress, σ θ = σ θ (deviatoric) + σ(hydrostatic) σ(hydrostatic) = (σ θ + σ r + σ z )/3 Deviatoric stress results in plastic strain (creep) Hydrostatic stress does not result in plastic strain (creep) 7

8 Sample Design SOLID CYLINDER INTERNAL MANDREL Black = Sample White = He Gas Red = Internal Mandrel TUBE INTERNAL MANDREL Solid cylinder internal mandrel generates more heat than the tube internal mandrel 8

9 RESULTS and DISCUSSION Gamma Heat Generation Rate [1/2] Total Dia. Strain vs. Deviatoric Hoop Stress for Gamma Heat Gen. Rate of 1.60x10 6 Btu/h-ft 3 SRA STD ZIRLO, Vogtle Unit 2 Cycle 10 (Test Assembly A1) Linear behavior TOTAL DIAMETER STRAIN, deltad/do (%) Calculated regression R 2 coefficient for different γ-heat rates Fit associated with highest R 2 coefficient DEVIATORIC HOOP STRESS (MPa) Tube Internal Mandrel Solid Cylinder Internal Mandrel Open to Water Fit 9

10 Gamma Heat Generation Rate [2/2] REGRESSION R 2 COEFFICIENT Regression R 2 Coefficient versus the Gamma Heat Generation Rate SRA STD ZIRLO, Vogtle 2 Cycle 10 (Test Assembly A1) 1.60x GAMMA HEAT GENERATION RATE (10 6 Btu/h-ft 3 ) Determined gamma heat generation rate Calculated internal pressures and stresses using the gamma heat generation rate 10

11 RESULTS and DISCUSSION In-Reactor Creep Compliance (1 Cycle, Cycle 10) [1/3] 0.8 Total Dia. Strain vs. Deviatoric Hoop Stress for Gamma Heat Gen. Rate of 1.60x10 6 Btu/h-ft 3 SRA STD ZIRLO, Vogtle Unit 2 Cycle 10 (Test Assembly A1) Linear behavior TOTAL DIAMETER STRAIN, deltad/do (%) In-reactor creep compliance (slope of the line) is the same in tension & compression DEVIATORIC HOOP STRESS (MPa) Tube Internal Mandrel Solid Cylinder Internal Mandrel Open to Water Fit 11

12 In-Reactor Creep Compliance (1 Cycle, Cycle 11) [2/3] 0.8 Total Dia. Strain vs. Deviatoric Hoop Stress for Gamma Heat Gen. Rate of 0.80x10 6 Btu/h-ft 3 SRA STD ZIRLO, Vogtle Unit 2 Cycle 11 (Test Assembly A5) Linear behavior TOTAL DIAMETER CREEP STRAIN, deltad/do (%) DEVIATORIC HOOP STRESS (MPa) Tube Internal Mandrel Solid Cylinder Internal Mandrel Open to Water Fit In-reactor creep compliance (slope of the line) is the same in tension & compression Same ΔD/D o vs. σ θ (dev.) behavior as Cycle 10 data 12

13 In-Reactor Creep Compliance (2 Cycles, Cycles 10-11) [3/3] 1.5 Total Dia. Strain vs. Deviatoric Hoop Stress for Gamma Heat Gen. Rate of 1.20x10 6 Btu/h-ft 3 SRA STD ZIRLO, Vogtle Unit 2 Cycles 10 & 11 (Test Assembly A3) Linear behavior TOTAL DIAMETER STRAIN, deltad/do (%) In-reactor creep compliance (slope of the line) is the same in tension & compression DEVIATORIC HOOP STRESS (MPa) Tube Intenal Mandrel Solid Cylinder Internal Mandrel Open to Water Fit 13

14 Split Total In-Reactor Strain into Growth & Creep Components ΔD/D o (creep) = ΔD/D o (measured total) ΔD/D o (growth) 14

15 Irradiation Growth 0.8 Total Diameter Strain versus the Pressure Difference SRA STD ZIRLO, Vogtle Unit 2 Cycle 10 (Test Assembly A1) Linear behavior TOTAL DIAMETER STRAIN, deltad/do (%) PRESSURE DIFFERENCE, P i -P o (MPa) Tube Internal Mandrel Solid Cylinder Internal Mandrel Open to Water Fit Data includes samples open to water on both sides Determined irradiation growth strain by regression analysis 15

16 Irradiation Creep Hoop Stress Correlation Irradiation Creep Diameter Strain versus Thick-Wall Hoop Stress (Total) SRA STD ZIRLO, Vogtle 2 Cycle 10 (Test Assembly A1) Linear behavior IRRADIATION CREEP DIAMETER STRAIN, deltad/do (%) HOOP STRESS (TOTAL) (MPa) Tube Internal Mandrel Solid Cylinder Internal Mandrel Open to Water Fit Fit Between -16 and 0 MPa, σ θ is negative & ΔD/D o is positive (the red line) physically unrealistic σ θ is not the correct driving force for irradiation creep 16

17 Irradiation Creep Deviatoric Hoop Stress Correlation (1 Cycle/Cycle 10) Irradiation Creep Diameter Strain versus Deviatoric Hoop Stress SRA STD ZIRLO, Vogtle Unit 2 Cycle 10 Linear behavior IRRADIATION CREEP DIAMETER STRAIN, deltad/do (%) Data pass through the origin Deviatoric σ θ is the driving force for irradiation creep DEVIATORIC HOOP STRESS (MPa) Tube Internal Mandrel Solid Cylinder Internal Mandrel Open to Water Regression Fit Tension = compression 17

18 Irradiation Creep Deviatoric Hoop Stress Correlation (1 Cycle/Cycle 11) Irradiation Creep versus Deviatoric Hoop Stress SRA STD ZIRLO (Test Assembly A5), Vogtle Unit 2 Cycle 11 Linear behavior IRRADIATION CREEP DIAMETER STRAIN, deltad/do (%) DEVIATORIC HOOP STRESS (MPa) Tube Internal Mandrel Solid Cylinder Internal Mandrel Open to Water Fit Data pass through the origin Deviatoric σ θ is the driving force for irradiation creep Tension = comp. ΔD/D o vs. σ θ (dev.) same as Cycle 10 data 18

19 Irradiation Creep Deviatoric Hoop Stress Correlation (2 Cycle/Cycles 10-11) Irradiation Creep versus Deviatoric Hoop Stress SRA STD ZIRLO, Vogtle Unit 2 Cycles 10 & 11 Linear behavior IRRADIATION CREEP DIAMETER STRAIN, deltad/do (%) Data pass through the origin Deviatoric σ θ is the driving force for irradiation creep DEVIATORIC HOOP STRESS (MPa) Tube Internal Mandrel Solid Cylinder Internal Mandrel Open to Water Fit Tension = compression 19

20 CONCLUSIONS For SRA ZIRLO, In-reactor creep compliance is the same in tension and compression If total in-reactor strain is split into growth and creep components: Deviatoric hoop stress is the driving force for irradiation creep Irradiation creep in tension is the same as compression 20

21 Thank you for your attention 21

22 PUBLICATIONS Initial 1 cycle results were reported in 15 th International Symposium of Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry Initial 1 cycle dosimetry results were reported in Proceedings of the 13 th International Symposium on Reactor Dosimetry 22