Biological iron and sulfate control in mining waters

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Biological iron and sulfate control in mining waters"

Transcription

1 Biological iron and sulfate control in mining waters Jaakko Puhakka Tampere University of Technology Comprehensive sulfate management in cold mining waters, Oulu, March 21, 218

2 Objectives To develop an integrated process comprising a fluidized-bed reactor (FBR) and a gravity settler for precipitative removal of iron and sulfate from bioleach liquors 1. Partial removal from bioleaching circuits 2. Removal from bioleaching effluent streams

3 Fluidized-bed reactors for iron oxidation at TUT FBR configuration

4 Various biomass carriers used in FBR s Various biomass carriers: Activated carbon (=AC) Diatomaceous earth (Celite) Al 2 O 3 (Compalox) Jarosite flocculated with InChem flock D 33 Criteria for carrier selection: Biomass hold-up capacity Chemical and mechanical durability Iron-oxidation rates Material costs

5 Bacterial communities developing on the carrier materials (DGGE) No readable sequence data obtained Leptospirillum ferriphilum (99-1 % similarity) Ferrimicrobium acidophilum (99-1 % similarity)

6 Process developed for iron and sulfate control (Not drawn to the scale) 9 1: Feed pump 2: FBR 3: Base addition 4: Settling tank 5: Aeration pump 6: Aeration unit 7: Recycle pump 8: System effluent 9: Precipitate removal

7 7 Feed solution: Barren heap bioleaching solution from which valuable metals (Cu, Zn, Ni and Co) had been recovered Initial ph ~3 Initial redox ~2-34 mv Initial Fe 2+ ~6-8 g/l

8 Removal of excess iron from bioleach circuit liquors

9 Fe 2+, g/l ph ph HRT, h Fe 2+, g/l HRT, h FBR performance at various HRTs a a HRT Time, day b Time, day Time, d b c Time, day Feed: FBR effluent: Time, d

10 Redox, mv FBR performance at various HRTs HRT, h a Iron oxidation rate, g Fe 2+ /L h te, Dissolved oxygen, DO 2, mg/l Rate Efficiency (%) Time, day Time, d Time, day Oxidation, % b c HRT, h Time, day Time, d

11 Precipitated percent, % Iron precipitation, mg/l h Precipitation of iron in the gravity settler at different FBR HRTs HRT, h a Time, d b Partial removal of iron from bioleach circuits Time, d

12 Removal of iron and sulfate from bioleaching effluent streams 12

13 Operational conditions during the experimental periods with ph adjustment HRT = 2 h HRT = 5 h HRT = 2 h ph 3 ph 2.5 ph 3. ph 3.5 ph 3.2 ph 3. ph 2.8 ph 2.8 ph adjustment with KOH ph adjustment with CaCO 3 6. g Fe 2+ /L in the feed 14.5 g Fe 2+ /L in the feed Time, d

14 Feed and effluent Fe 2+ concentrations during the ph adjustment KOH CaCO 3 Fe 2+, g/l Time, d Feed Effluent

15 Iron precipitation rate, g/l h m Precipitation efficiency, % Iron oxidation rate, g Fe 2+ /L h Oxidation efficiency, % DO, mg/l Red Iron oxidation Time, dayand precipitation c rates KOH CaCO 3 ph and efficiencies Time, day Time, day Time, d d e Rates Efficiencies

16 Precipitated [Fe/S] SO 4 2-, g/l Sulfate concentration in the FBR feed, effluent, and precipitated sulfate, and precipitated mol ratio of [Fe]:[S] KOH CaCO KOH CaCO 3 ph a 4 2 FBR feed Effluent Precipitated sulfate Time, day bb Time, d Theoretical mol ratio of [Fe]:[S] of pure jarosite with the idealized formula of XFe 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6, where X = Na +, K +, NH 4+ or H 3 O +

17 An X-ray diffractogram of precipitate from gravity settler without ph adjustment All peaks with labeled d-values (in Å) represent Na- and H 3 O-jarosites

18 Precipitates - ph adjustment with KOH 18 Natro jarosite, NaFe 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 Jarosite, hydronian (K,H 3 O) Fe 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 Goethite (a-feooh) ph

19 19 Precipitates - ph adjustment with CaCO 3 Brushite CaPO 3 (OH) 2 H 2 O Jarosite synthetic KFe 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 Jarosite, hydronian (K,H 3 O) Fe 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 Gypsum (CaSO4 2H2O) ph g Fe 2+ / L

20 Conclusions The integrated process consisting of an FBR combined with a gravity settler in the recycle line can be applied for: 1) Iron control (partial removal) in bioleaching applications to prevent the accumulation of dissolved iron in leaching circuits. The process can be optimized for efficient and high-rate iron regeneration 2) Treatment of bioleaching effluents for high-rate and high-efficiency iron and sulfate removal as stable end products