TEST REPORT. Product Name : Kodak NexPress Opaque White Dry Ink Style/Model # : KH Country of Origin : USA Age Grading : N/A

Transcription

1 TEST REPORT Applicant: Attention: Eastman Kodak Company 343 State Street Rochester, NY Gwenette Erickson Product Name : Kodak NexPress Opaque White Dry Ink Style/Model # : KH Country of Origin : USA Age Grading : N/A Supplier : Eastman Kodak Company No. of Samples: 1 Date Received / Date Test Started : September 26,2016/September 28,2016 OVERALL CONCLUSION: Standard Result CFR 1303 Section 101 Total Lead In Surface Coatings 1. Does Comply 2. ASTM F Soluble Heavy Metals In Paints 2. Does Comply 3. EN 71-3:2013+A1:2014 Migration of Certain Elements 3. See Results Below 4. Phthalate Content 4. Does Not Exceed the Limit For and on behalf of Intertek Products Group North America: Janice Cleaveland Chemist, Senior Chemical Testing Laboratories Page 1 of 7

2 TEST RESULTS: 1. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) Section 101 Total Lead in Paints and Surface Coatings Test Method: CPSC-CH-E Requirement: The lead content shall not exceed weight percent (90 ppm) of the dried paint film as required by the CPSIA Test Results: Number Result (ppm) Limit (ppm) 1 <20 90 Number Description 1 KH White Dry Ink Conclusion: When tested as specified, the submitted sample(s) does comply with the lead in paints and surface coatings requirements according to the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, Section 101. Page 2 of 7

3 2. ASTM F Soluble Heavy Metals in Paints and other Surface Coating Materials Procedure: ASTM F963-11, Section Test Results: Restricted Substances Results (ppm) 1 Limit (ppm) Soluble Antimony < Soluble Arsenic < Soluble Barium < Soluble Cadmium < Soluble Chromium < Soluble Lead < Soluble Mercury < Soluble Selenium < # = Test portion is between 10 mg to 100 mg and the quantities of the appropriate elements are calculated as if 100 mg of the test portion has been used. Description Number 1 KH White Dry Ink Conclusion: When tested as specified, the submitted sample does comply with the soluble limits for heavy metals according to section (2) of ASTM F Page 3 of 7

4 3. EN 71-3:2013+A1:2014 Migration of Certain elements (Category I) Reference EU Directive 2009/48/EC Annex II, section III, part 13 Test Method: EN 71-3:2013+A1:2014 Category I - Dry, brittle, powder like or pliable materials Solid material from which powder-like material is released during playing and semi-solid materials that may also leave residues on the hands during play, which may contribute to the oral exposure of the material. o Compressed paint tablets o Cores of colouring pencils o Chalk o Crayons o Other materials intended to leave a trace or similar materials in solid form appearing as such in the toy o Pliable modelling materials, including modelling clays, Plasticine o Bouncy putty o Oven-hardening PVC modelling compounds o Plaster of Paris Test Results: Results Restricted Element (ppm) Limits (ppm) 1 Aluminum Antimony < Arsenic < Barium < Boron < Cadmium < Total Chromium [Cr (III)] 0.02 [Cr (VI)] Cobalt < Copper < Lead < Manganese < Mercury < Nickel < Selenium < Strontium < Total Tin < (Tin) Page 4 of 7

5 0.9 (Organic Tin) Zinc Number Description 1 KH White Dry Ink Remark: # = Test portion is between 10 mg to 100 mg and the quantities of the appropriate elements are calculated as if 100 mg of the test portion has been used. Note: We do not currently have the capability to test migration of organic tin, chromium (III) and chromium (VI).Recommendations for further testing are based on the lowest limit values as applicable to chromium (III), chromium (VI) and organic tin. Remark: When tested as above, one of the tested components may be in violation of the Chromium (III), Chromium (VI) and/or Organic Tin requirements per EN 71-3:2013+A1:2014. To determine, and report accurately, further testing is recommended. Page 5 of 7

6 4. Chemical Analysis: Phthalate Content Requirements: Regulation Proposition 65 (DBP, DEHP, BBP, DIDP, DnHP) Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 Imposed Limits <0.1% each per Alameda Superior Court Case No. BG DBP, BBP, or DEHP <0.1% DnOP, DINP, or DIDP <0.1% for mouthable toys or childcare articles Test Results: CPSIA Section 108 Regulated Phthalates Result (%) 1 Di- butyl Phthalate (DBP) <0.005 Butyl Benzyl Phthalate (BBP) <0.005 Di (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP) <0.005 Di-(n-octyl) Phthalate (DnOP) <0.005 Di-(iso-nonyl) Phthalate (DINP) <0.005 Di-(iso-decyl)Phthalate (DIDP) <0.005 Prop 65 Di-n-hexyl phthalate (DnHP) <0.005 Number Description 1 KH White Dry Ink Conclusion: The phthalate content test result does not exceed the limit of 0.1% by weight of the phthalates, as recommended by CPSIA and Proposition 65 case settlement BG according to IOS-MAT Page 6 of 7

7 The test results stated in this report relate only to the item(s) tested. This test report may not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of Intertek. If you need assistance in interpreting these results or if you have any questions, please feel free to call Customer Service Department This report is made solely on the basis of your instructions and/or information and materials supplied by you. It is not intended to be a recommendation for any particular course of action. Intertek does not accept a duty of care or any other responsibility to any person other than the Client in respect of this report and only accepts liability to the Client insofar as is expressly contained in the terms and conditions governing Intertek's provision of services to you. Intertek makes no warranties or representations either express or implied with respect to this report save as provided for in those terms and conditions. We have aimed to conduct the Review on a diligent and careful basis and we do not accept any liability to you for any loss arising out of or in connection with this report, in contract, tort, by statute or otherwise, except in the event of our gross negligence or willful misconduct. Page 7 of 7

8 USA March 20, 2017 TEST REPORT Applicant: Attention: Eastman Kodak Company 1999 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY Gwenette Erickson Product Name : Kodak NexPress Opaque White Dry Ink Style/Model # : KH Age Grading : N/A Country of Origin: USA No. Of Samples: 1 Supplier : Eastman Kodak Company Previous Report # : Sample Received Date : March 9, 2017 Final Confirmation Received Date: March 14, 2017 Report Completion Date : March 17, 2017 OVERALL CONCLUSION: Standard Result 1. Migration of Certain Elements (Category III)- EN 71-3:2013+A1: Pass For and on behalf of Intertek Products Group North America: Delilah Sierra Customer Service Page 1 of 3

9 USA March 20, 2017 TEST RESULTS: 1. EN 71-3:2013+A1:2014 Migration of Certain elements (Category III) Reference EU Directive 2009/48/EC Annex II, section III, part 13 Test Method: EN 71-3:2013+A1:2014 Category III - Scraped-off materials Solid material with or without a coating, which can be ingested as a result of biting, tooth scraping, sucking or licking. o Coatings of paints, varnishes, lacquers, printing inks, polymers, foams and similar coatings o Polymeric and similar materials, including laminates, whether textile reinforced or not, but excluding other textiles o Paper and paper board o Textiles, whether natural or synthetic o Glass, ceramic, metallic materials o Other materials whether mass coloured or not (e.g. wood, fibre board, hard board, bone and leather) Test Results: Restricted Element Results (ppm) 1 Limits (ppm) Aluminum Antimony < Arsenic < Barium < Boron < Cadmium < Total Chromium [Cr (III)] 0.2 [Cr (VI)] Cobalt < Copper < Lead < Manganese < Mercury < Nickel < Selenium < Strontium < Total Tin < (Tin) 12 (Organic Tin) Zinc Page 2 of 3

10 USA March 20, 2017 Number 1 Kodak Nexpress opaque white dry ink Description Remark: # = Test portion is between 10 mg to 100 mg and the quantities of the appropriate elements are calculated as if 100 mg of the test portion has been used. Note: We do not currently have the capability to test migration of organic tin, chromium (III) and chromium (VI).Recommendations for further testing are based on the lowest limit values as applicable to chromium (III), chromium (VI) and organic tin. Conclusion: The submitted sample does meet the acceptable limits as specified in EN 71-3:2013+A1:2014 Migration of Certain Elements. The test results stated in this report relate only to the item(s) tested. This test report may not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of Intertek. If you need assistance in interpreting these results or if you have any questions, please feel free to call Customer Service Department This report is made solely on the basis of your instructions and/or information and materials supplied by you. It is not intended to be a recommendation for any particular course of action. Intertek does not accept a duty of care or any other responsibility to any person other than the Client in respect of this report and only accepts liability to the Client insofar as is expressly contained in the terms and conditions governing Intertek's provision of services to you. Intertek makes no warranties or representations either express or implied with respect to this report save as provided for in those terms and conditions. We have aimed to conduct the Review on a diligent and careful basis and we do not accept any liability to you for any loss arising out of or in connection with this report, in contract, tort, by statute or otherwise, except in the event of our gross negligence or willful misconduct. Page 3 of 3