HIRING & FIRING Presented By: Douglas J. Farmer, Esq. Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C. One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94105 415-442-4810 Douglas.farmer@ogletreedeakins.com
HIRING: EMPLOYEE OR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR?
HIRING EMPLOYEES: AN OVERVIEW OF ANTI- DISCRIMINATION LAWS
Independent Contractors and Employees Defined Independent Contractors A worker who is self-employed, contracts to do a piece of work according to his or her own methods, and is subject to an employer s control only as to the end product or final result of the work performed.
Independent Contractors and Employees Defined Employee A worker in the service of another where the employer has the power or right to control and direct the worker in the material details of how the work is to be performed.
Why Does the Classification Matter? Scrutiny from Various Agencies IRS U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services NLRB DOL OSHA Unemployment and Work Comp Divisions Taxes Wages Benefits Penalties Civil liability Microsoft cases Criminal consequences
Multiple Tests and Definitions Economic Realities Test (typically FLSA) Federal minimum wage/overtime Is individual economically dependent on business to which services are provided or is individual in business for herself? Right of Control Test/Common Law Test (IRS) Hybrid Test (typically discrimination context) Remedial Legislation Test (unemployment/work comp/specific statutes)
20 Factor Right of Control Test The IRS uses a 20 factor right of control test to determine if a worker is an independent contractor or an employee.
20 Factor Right of Control Test continued Instruction Training Integration of the worker s services into business operations Services rendered personally Hiring, supervising and paying assistants to help a worker Continuity of relationship Scheduling and set hours Full-time or part-time status Performance of work on employer s premises Performance of work in a set order or sequence Regular submission of oral or written reports Method of payment Payment of business and/or traveling expenses Furnishing tools and materials Investment in equipment or facilities Realization of profits and losses Working for multiple employers Services available to general public Dismissal for reasons other than non-performance of contract Termination of relationship without liability for nonperformance of contract
20 Factors Reduced to Three Indicators of Control Behavioral Control Training, instructions, location, hours and duration of work. Suggestions are not training or instructions. Relationship Between the Parties Employee benefits, termination, intent of the parties (written contracts), permanency, and regular course of business. Financial Control (Economic Realities) Distribution of profits and losses, significant investments in materials and equipment, unreimbursed expenses, services available to the public and method of payment.
Economic and Legal Ramifications Tax Liability FICA, FUTA, Personal Income Tax Penalties Third Party Liability Liability to Employees and Contingent Workers
Types of Liability to Employees and Independent Contractors Workers compensation laws The Fair Labors Standards Act Overtime pay Personal liability Collective, class actions Employee benefit plans Some state and federal statutes prohibiting discrimination, harassment and retaliation
Pointers to Consider Regarding Employee or Independent Contractor Status Maintain written agreements. State nature of relationship Explain rights to control method of work, hours, dress, hiring of staff/employees, how project is to be accomplished Explain obligation to use own equipment, bear responsibility for all costs and expenses, bear liability for all taxes
Pointers to Consider continued Maintain written agreements continued Expressly exclude contingent worker from employee benefits Include indemnification provisions Make agreement arms length
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS Bases for discrimination Issues of discrimination Theories of discrimination
PRE-EMPLOYMENT INQUIRIES (JOB APPLICATION AND INTERVIEWS)
PROHIBITED INQUIRIES Employers may not ask applicant questions that elicit information that cannot be considered in making a hiring decision FEHA presumes prohibited information was factor in hiring
PROHIBITED INQUIRIES Questions eliciting information about race, sex, national origin, age, religion, disability, marital status, citizenship, color disability, sexual orientation
PROHIBITED INQUIRIES Examples: Date of birth or school attendance are you a citizen? Name and address of relative, spouse or children Organizations, clubs, societies to which applicant belongs Provisions for child care Questions likely to elicit information about a disability
PROHIBITED INQUIRIES Examples from EEOC Regulations: No questions about ability to perform major life activities No questions about whether applicant will need reasonable accommodation to do the job No questions about medical or workers compensation history No questions about lawful drug use
PROHIBITED INQUIRIES Examples from EEOC Regulations: May ask if applicant can perform specific job functions If disability is known may ask applicant to demonstrate or describe how task would be performed Arrests not leading to convictions Credit histories
EMPLOYMENT APPLICATIONS AND JOB INTERVIEWS
EMPOYMENT APPLICATIONS Inquiries sufficient to avoid negligent hiring claims No comments that could create an implied contract
APPLICANT INTERVIEW FORMS Same restrictions as applications Avoid discrimination by establishing uniform standards Develop forms/documentation to reflect: Uniform questions for all applicants Uniform selection criteria Uniform interviewers/decision makers
USE OF JOB OFFER LETTERS EMPLOYERS & LAWYERS, WORKING TOGETHER
JOB OFFER LETTERS Merger clause At-will reference or disclaimer Avoid specific period of employment Incorporate terms of handbook Do you want to create a contract?
QUESTIONS ABOUT HIRING? EMPLOYERS & LAWYERS, WORKING TOGETHER
TERMINATION AND DISCIPLINE EMPLOYERS & LAWYERS, WORKING TOGETHER
WHAT IS AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT? Presumption, absent an agreement to the contrary, that employees and their employers are each free to discontinue their employment relationship at anytime, for any reason, with or without notice Labor Code 2922 codified the at-will presumption in California
DOES AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT STILL EXIST IN CALIFORNIA? The Reality: ability to freely discharge employees increasingly restricted
DOES AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT STILL EXIST IN CALIFORNIA? Three categories of restrictions upon California s employers rights to freely discharge employees: 1. Statutes Anti-discrimination laws Whistleblower protections Protections against discharge for jury duty or political activity
DOES AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT STILL EXIST IN CALIFORNIA? 2. Contracts Private contracts Express or implied 3. Public Policy Public policy exceptions Breach of express or implied contract Breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
ADMINISTERING PERSONNEL POLICIES TO MINIMIZE EXPOUSRE TO WRONGFUL TERMINATION CLAIMS Enforce strict at-will employment practices Employment applications Offer letters Express employment contracts
AVOID COMMON TERMINATION MISTAKES Giving a reason which later proves false or inaccurate Termination violates company practice or policy Bad documentation
ASSESSING FOR HIGH RISK TERMINATION FACTORS Employee is in one or more protected groups or is long term Employee history of claims against the company or others Supervisor has a history
ASSESSING FOR HIGH RISK TERMINATION FACTORS Is on or has recently returned from a statutorily authorized leave (FMLA/CFRA; ADA; Workers Comp) Employee has recently complained Giving a reason which later proves false or inaccurate
MINIMIZING RISKS OF TERMINATONS: CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES Demotions Training Lateral transfers Delay termination to create better documentation
THE USE OF SEVERANCE AGREMENTS TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO WRONGFUL TERMINATION CLAIMS Severance agreements General releases Specific release of age discrimination claims Provide consideration Non-waivable claims
THE USE OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS TO MINIMIZE LIABILITY Maintain record of employer efforts to provide employee with notice of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement Evaluations should be accurate and effective Establish performance standards which are jobrelated, objective and clear Evaluate at regular intervals
THE USE OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS TO MINIMIZE LIABILITY Managers must know how to properly administer evaluation system Avoid subjective criteria Evaluate strictly based on employee s actual responsibilities
USE OF TERMINATON LETTERS TO AVOID LIABILITY Carefully state reasons for termination Dates and subject matter of prior warnings/discipline Benefits to which employee is entitled Ability to appeal or review Last day of work/exit interview Final paycheck/company property
CONDUCT EXIT INTERVIEW TO AVOID LIABILITY Conduct meeting in private Avoid having antagonizers present Have a second manager attend
CONDUCT EXIT INTERVIEW TO AVOID LIABILITY Be brief (15 minutes should do it) Avoid escorting Arrange exit interview (if appropriate) Provide termination letter (if appropriate)
QUESTIONS? EMPLOYERS & LAWYERS, WORKING TOGETHER
THANK YOU Douglas J. Farmer, Esq. Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C. One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94105 415-442-4810 douglas.farmer@ogletreedeakins.com