Integration of Natura 2000 into EU funding

Similar documents
INTEGRATION OF NATURA 2000 AND BIODIVERSITY INTO EU FUNDING (EAFRD, ERDF, CF, EMFF, ESF)

Prioritised Action Frameworks (PAFs) for Natura 2000

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document

How green is the future of EU Regional Funds?

ELARD on the road to the

FOCUS AREA 5E: Carbon conservation / sequestration

State of play of CAP measure Agri-environment payments in the European Union

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

REVIEW OF ECONOMIC GROWTH FACTORS OF RURAL AREAS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

The implementation of forestry measures under the Rural Development Regulation 1698/2005 for the period

The EU Renewable Energy Framework for Biogas. Giulio Volpi Renewable Energy and CCS Unit DG Energy, European Commission

Trends in waste generation and management in Europe. Özgür Saki European Environment Agency

Relating to the transnational hiring-out of workers in the framework of the provision of services

Rural Development Policy

Phosphorus Regulations in Europe

SHIPMENTS TO ALL COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Reforming, or transforming, Common Agricultural Policy?

Biodiversity Priorities for Ireland ( ) Andy Bleasdale

PATTERNS OF THE AGRICULTURAL INCOME AND IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL CHANGES POST-ENLARGEMENT AMONG EU STATES

ATTITUDES TOWARDS BIODIVERSITY

RDP sub-measures analysis: M16.4 Short supply chains and local markets

Unbundling and Regulatory Bodies in the context of the recast of the 1 st railway package

RDP analysis: Measure 16 Cooperation M16.4. Short supply chains and local markets

Rural Development Programmes

Publishing date: 07/02/2018. We appreciate your feedback. Share this document

European Commission. Communication on Support Schemes for electricity from renewable energy sources

Europe s water in figures

ANNUAL PUBLICATION: detailed data. VOLUME OF EXPORTS FELL BY 4,7 PER CENT IN 2015 Export prices rose 0,7 per cent. 24 March 2016

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Review of greening after one year

The European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) European Commission Joint Research Centre DG Environment.

State of play of energy efficiency investment and financing scheme Czech Republic

Fact Sheet. O v e r v i e w o f t h e C A P H e a l t h C h e c k and the European Economic Recovery Plan Modification of the RDPs

RDP analysis: Measure 16 Cooperation M16.2. Pilot projects

Cohesion Policy and ecosystem services. Mathieu Fichter European Commission - DG REGIO

E U R O P E A N U N I O N

The Renewable Energy Directive the role of National Renewable Energy Action Plans in reaching the 2020 targets

Study on Employment, Growth and Innovation in Rural Areas (SEGIRA)

The CAP towards Implementation of Rural Development Policy. State of Play of RDPs

Introduction to Solid Waste Management and Legal framework in the European Union

European level report: Evaluation of the contribution of Operational Programmes to the implementation of EU water policy

Core projects and scientific studies as background for the NREAPs. 9th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency

Farm Economics brief

Financing Nature-Based Solutions

Farm structures. This document does not necessarily represent the official views of the European Commission

WFD and Agriculture Linkages at the EU Level Summary report on an in-depth assessment of RDprogrammes as regards water management

Recent findings on greening of the Common Agricultural Policy

Emissions Trading System (ETS): The UK needs to deliver its share of the total EU ETS emissions reduction of 21% by 2020, compared to 2005;

Flash Eurobarometer 426. SMEs, Resource Efficiency and Green Markets

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

Bioenergy development in Finland and EU: Fatcors affecting the future development

ESF Ex-Post evaluation

H Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

Implementation of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive; contribution to the Water Framework Directive.

Workshop on developed country targets. Bangkok, 3 April EU contribution

Excessive Deficit Procedure Statistics Working Group

Summer 2009 ozone report (preliminary results)

Attitudes of Europeans towards resource efficiency. Analytical report

Energy demand dynamics and infrastructure development plans in the EU. October 10 th, 2012 Jonas Akelis, Managing Partner - Baltics

RES in SEERMAP some key inputs to the analysis

The need for better statistics for climate change policies

The EPBD and EED implementation in Poland from the perspective of the Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE)

H Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

Prepared for: IGD 2014

Summary Report on Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Based on 2016 Member States Reports

The interactions of complementary policies with a GHG cap and trade program: the case of Europe

Exploring the wide dispersion in productivity among European firms

ERGP REPORT ON CORE INDICATORS FOR MONITORING THE EUROPEAN POSTAL MARKET

AMBITION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY TARGETS FOR THE EU IN 2030

ENERGY AUDITS (AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS) UNDER THE EED

Wawrzyniec Czubak

Making the Parcel Regulation work. 17th Königswinter Postal Seminar 5-7 February

The European Commission s science and knowledge service. Scene-setter on jobs and growth in EU agri-food sector. Joint Research Centre

Study on Storage Capacities and Logistical

18 EU Member States adopted a ban** (AT, BE, DE, DK, EE, FI, FR, HU, HR, LT, LU, NL, PL, RO, SE, SL, SK, UK), as well as Norway and Switzerland.

Developments on Waste to Energy across Europe

National action plans Prospects and requirements for the new renewables action plans in Italy

Energy Efficiency Perspectives and Priorities Vleva EUSEW, 24 June 2014

Brief on agricultural biomass production 1

University of National and World Economy

Renewable energy technologies/sources path within EU 2020 strategy

Authors: Jannick H. Schmidt, 2.-0 LCA consultants

energy in figures Energy

NEGOTIATING THE NEW WORLD OF WORK WHAT ROLE FOR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING?

ISSN energy. in figures. Energy

European Fisheries Fund and plans elaborated for the EMFF ( ) Romanian experiences

Annex 2: Assess the efficiency rates in function of environmental and climatic conditions and agricultural practices

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

VALUATION OF PUBLIC GOODS AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES PROVIDED BY AGRICULTURE

I) Background information. 1. Age

EPR and packaging what are current challenges and issues :

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

10763/1/14 REV 1 ADB/mk 1 DG B 4A

Sustainability of the Food System - Public Consultation

Role of the trade unions in the protection and interest representation of employees in Europe

Environmental statistics in Europe Facts and figures on the environment: from environmental taxes to water resources

Integration of Digital Technology. Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2018 Integration of Digital Technologies 1

Transcription:

Integration of Natura 2000 into EU funding Results of the study of "The N2K Group" Expert Group on the Management Brussels, 18 April 2016

16 Member States and regions 101 programmes RDPs, ERDF, CF, ESF, EMFF

Sweden Finland Germany/ MVP Estonia UK/ England Poland France/ Burgundy Slovakia Romania Bulgaria Portugal Spain/ Aragon Italy/ Sardinia Slovenia Greece Cyprus

Scope of the study General information about the MFF 2014-2020 Analysis of OPs for all the funds Examples of good practice Short case studies Comparisons between MS/regions Aggregated data (e.g. per types of measures) Info about allocations (where possible) Info about consultations Info about complementarity

Natura 2000: Integration in the RDPs M01 - Knowledge transfer and information actions (art. 14) M02 - Advisory services, farm management (art. 15) M04 - Investments in physical assets and farm relief services (art. 17) M07 - Basic services and village renewal in rural areas (art. 20) M08 - Investments in forest area development and improvement of the viability of forests (art. 21-26) M10 - Agri-environment-climate (art. 28) M11 - Organic farming (art. 29) M12- Natura 2000 and Water Framework Directive payments (art. 30) M13 - Payments to areas facing natural or other specific constraints (art. 31) M15 - Forest-environmental and climate services and forest conservation (art. 34) M16 - Co-operation (art. 35)

Forest measures only in half of the RDPs Not enough soft measures Allocations too small Not enough consistency with (RDPs not traslate the PAF p Forest measures only in half IAS control "Soft measures" (training, communication) All RDPs address N2000 Broad consistency with the PAFs

Agri-environment-climate

Information based on table 11.4 in the RDPs Not possible to provide info for all MS/regions Clear gaps between the RDPs and PAFs

Indicators: land under management contracts Priority 4a: surface and percentage of agricultural and forest land under management contracts supporting biodiversity in 2023

European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Cohesion Fund (CF) Less developed regions/ms have used the opportunity Good integration of measures for non-agri habitats and species (freshwater) Connectivity, capacity building/knowledge base Some MS/regions (FI, SE, MVP-DE) did not use TO6(d) Indicators not well adapted to track progress Not enough allocations (on average less than 2%)

EU contribution to Natura 2000 and biodiversity in the ERDF and CF OPs and financial needs for Natura 2000 (PAFs; in million EUR) Natura Operational Total EU EU contribution 2000 Programmes contribution in to categories % needs (ERDF and CF) the OPs 085+086 (PAF) ARAGON 119.9 4.9 4.12 N.A. BULGARIA 1,504.8 86.2 5.73 1,718 BURGUNDY 223.7 9.9 4.43 N.A. CYPRUS 561.6 5 0.89 880 ENGLAND 3,628.3 66.9 1.84 2,988 ESTONIA 3,534.6 57.5 1.63 405 FINLAND 1,299.5 0 0 2,604 GREECE 8,564.5 100.7 1.18 685 MECKLENBURG- VORP. 967.8 5.4 0.56 POLAND 58,690.6 419.2 0.71 1,621 PORTUGAL 10,021.5 40 0.40 951 ROMANIA 16,118.5 294.7 1.83 3,527 SARDINIA 465.5 14.4 3.10 N.A SLOVAKIA 5,260.8 183.9 3.50 543 SLOVENIA 3,011.9 40.5 1.35 1,627 SWEDEN 859,3 0 0 1,246 N.A.

Targets and indicators BURGUNDY OP ERDF BULGARIA OP Environment GREECE - OP Transport and environment GREECE - OP West. Macedonia GREECE OP Central Macedonia POLAND OP Infrastructure and environment SARDINIA OP ERFD SLOVAKIA OP Environment Increase in the biotopes in a better condition with additional 6,800 km 2 4.4 million ha of species and habitats in Natura 2000 with improved conservation status An increase in the protected Natura 2000 areas by 80% Protect additional 60,000 ha of the Natura 2000 sites Protection of additional 530,000 ha of the Natura 2000 sites 100% of the Natura 2000 sites covered by management plans Reducing the surface of Sardinia's Natura 2000 sites with a relatively low degree of conservation under 6% Total surface area of rehabilitated land: 452 ha %/no. of habs/spp. with improved CS (BG, PT, Sardinia, SK, SI; % of N2000 with man. plans (PL, GR, BG). No. of sites with operational admin structure (RO). Ha of sites covered by actions to improve CS (PT, SK, GR, EE, BG, Sardinia, RO, Burgundy, SI, PL). Ha of water bodies under measures to improve ecological status (SI) No of projects to preserve/restore wetlands and corridors (Burgundy).

European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) all OPs include measures for nature and biodiversity some OPs: measures for inland waters no indicators at the level of specific objectives or measures not possible to know resources allocated to N2000 Output indicators provided in some OPs (e.g. number of projects) Results indicators (increase in the coverage of Natura 2000)

EMFF OP EMFF contribution ( ) to TO6 2014-2020 Bulgaria 27,184,818 Cyprus 23,404,651 Estonia 24,707,255 Finland 38,263,645 France 213,906,395 Germany 113,340,225 Greece 136.128.894 Italy 215.467.331 Poland 149,790,336 Portugal 106,781,617 Romania 37,052,701 Slovakia 2,167,880 Slovenia 8,166,308 Spain 362.227.558 Sweden 83,747,089 UK 143,456,513

European Social Fund (ESF) capacity building for N2000 information and education, creation of new jobs and green business (e.g. BG, PL, RO). very little integration of nature and biodiv not possible to estimate allocations targets and indicators very generic no specific indicators

Complementary use of EU funds some examples of good integration and complementary use of funds (BG, SK,CY) broad consistency with the PAFs some integration into other TOs forests, freshwater, marine and coastal habitats poorly covered species needs often missing education, training, information, communication often missing allocation not sufficient

Allocations to Natura 2000 and biodiversity and financial needs estimated in the PAF

Conclusions Better integration in the RDPs than other OPs PAFs helpful but not sufficiently covered Complementarity not used fully Allocation not possible to show precisely Targets and indicators often not adapted to monitor progress

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/nat ura2000/financing/index_en.htm

Contact: Przemyslaw.Oginski@ec.europa.eu For more information, please consult: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/index_en.htm http://ec.europa.eu/environment 21