Peter Blundell Chairman Queensland Murray-Darling Committee Inc

Similar documents
Sustainable river management in the Queensland Murray Darling Basin

Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises

Comments on Sunshine Coast Regional Council DRAFT Biodiversity Strategy 2009 Noosa Biosphere Sector Boards working group, December 2009.

Biodiversity certification and banking in coastal and growth areas

VICTORIA S NATIVE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION

Ipswich City Council PLANNING SCHEME FACT SHEET NO. 4

Woady Yaloak Catchment Group

Key Environmental Constraints Affecting Queensland Agriculture

Submission. Specific concerns - Missing Information

SUBMISSION GUIDE ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. May

WESTERN DIVISION POLICY

Saving Habitat, Protecting Wildlife and Restoring Land: Ending broadscale tree clearing in Queensland (again)

Environmental Impact Statement Surat Gas Project

National Landcare Programme Community Grants Guidelines

60 Sunshine Coast Biodiversity Strategy

FACT SHEET 1: Changes to code-based land clearing

Analysis of Woody Vegetation Clearing Rates in Queensland. Supplementary report to Land cover change in Queensland

Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets 30 July 2008

S e c t i o n B i o d i ve r s i t y

Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project : 21 years of ecosystem repair and management in the Hunter River estuary Updated: 8/3/2016

Managing Category R regrowth vegetation

profit through knowledge

Acknowledgements Roger Swain TFGA President

Rice Industry Environment Policy

DRAFT SUBMISSION REGARDING

Te Mania Sub-Catchment Action Plan

Catchment management bodies in four Australian states: structures, legislation, and relationships to Government agencies

Land Management (Native Vegetation) Code 2017 under the

australian network of environmental defender s offices

PROPOSED CHANGES TO NSW BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION LAWS Biodiversity Conservation Bill and Local Land Services Amendment Bill

Innovation in Restoration

Outcomes report. Review of the native vegetation clearing regulations

Workshop on Forest Accounting Rio de Janeiro 25 September 2009

SUBMISSION INTO THE DRAFT BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT

SA Inquiry into Biodiversity - How well do the Inquiry recommendations align to APEEL s thinking?

Vegetation Management and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2018

LLS Codes of Practice

1. The impacts of development and settlement intensification on biodiversity and Aboriginal cultural heritage;

New Land Clearing Laws. Jemilah Hallinan Outreach Director Community Programs

OEH response to the Independent Review of the Biodiversity Assessment Method Recommendation 12 of the biodiversity legislation review called for a

Submission Guide: Ecologically Sustainable Development

Submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Reference Committee

Canada-Ontario Domestic Action Plan for Lake Erie Phosphorus Reduction. Agriculture Sector Working Group April 19, 2017

Submission to the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Populations and Communities

Vegetation Management and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018

awetlands aprairie aforests ahabitat for Fish, Game & Wildlife

Why prepare a Strategy? Broulee assessment area Biodiversity values Planning issues Management issues Process from here

Ecological Society of Australia submission on Australia s Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Consultation draft

Green Gold Label Program

Ecologically Sustainable Fire Management for the Northern Rivers region of NSW

A FOREST POLICY FOR NEW ZEALAND

Case Study 1 Improving biodiversity and regional economies woody weed control

Recreation Management Framework

COAL AND COAL SEAM GAS REGULATION

RIPARIAN LAND MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC ACCESS DISTRICT WIDE ACTIVITY

REGIONAL NATIVE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLANS: A MODEL. Prepared for the World Wide Fund For Nature, December 2000

Environmental water requirements. Surface water

CATEGORY a protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biodiversity.

POST/ SUBMISSION DETAILS Date Received 07/03/2017 Name. Postcode 3805 Privacy Options

SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION SOCIETY S 2018 CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS

Strategic Plan of Action

NRM SOUTH S ABORIGINAL ENGAGEMENT AND PARTICIPATION FRAMEWORK

PLANNING ASSESSMENT SHEET: FARMING ACTIVITY IN HINDS/HEKEAO CATCHMENT

Horticultural Development within the Peel-Harvey Coastal Plain Catchment

Long Term Strategic Plan

Regional Planning in Queensland s Rangelands: Challenges and Prospects for Biodiversity Conservation

QLDC Council 24 March Report for Agenda Item: 5

Protection of Drought Refugia in the Murray Darling Basin

This conservation advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: <insert date approved>

The Murray Darling Basin Plan. May This occasional paper provides an overview of the process of developing the Murray Darling Basin Plan.

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

Morton West, Dacland. Hydrology / Stormwater Management Report Permit Application

Coal Seam Gas Water Management

PART 1 PART 2. An SEA Screening Report is attached for the plan, programme or strategy (PPS) entitled: COMPLETE PART 3 OR 4 OR 5 PART 3

The EPBC Act Opportunities and Implications for Rural Landholders

Australia Pacific LNG Environmental Constraints Planning and Field Development Protocol

Tamar Estuary and Esk Rivers Program. Strategic Framework

Monaro Region (map 1): data/assets/pdf_file/0011/438338/regional-map1-monaro-plantedforest.

A NEW MODEL FOR LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION IN NEW SOUTH WALES

A new policy framework for a more sustainable EU agriculture. Pierre Bascou DG Agriculture and rural development European commission

IUCN Standard on the Protection of Natural Habitats

Practical aspects of implementing the SEQ NRM Plan. Simon Warner

Chapter 13 Private Native Forestry: River Red Gum

Network utilities, subject to compliance with Part 6 (Infrastructure) A.3 Existing vegetation cover.

Information on LULUCF actions by Sweden. First progress report

Environment Levy Projects

National Farmers Federation

BioCondition, Ecological Equivalence and Environmental Offsets

Understanding the State Planning Policy July 2017 Changes to state interest statements, policies and assessment benchmarks

NATIVE VEGETATION REFORMS IN NSW

September 2016 ID Competency Statement Type

PART 1. To: Scottish Consultation Authorities: PART 2

REDESIGNING INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016

ACHIEVING SUCCESSFUL CHANGE. Towards effects-based strategies in the GBR

Submission Emissions Trading Scheme Discussion Paper

South West Peak Slowing the Flow Project Manager

Vertebrate Pest - Council Policy Version 5-26 October Council Policy. Vertebrate Pest. Table of Contents. Table of Contents... 1 Policy...

Verification of controlled wood supply according to FSC-STD (V2-1) EN Annex 3 and FSC-STD Item 5.

The Wildlife Trusts Biodiversity Benchmark Requirements

Transcription:

Queensland Murray-Darling Committee Inc. ABN 46 082 833 823 Cnr Campbell and Bellevue Streets Phone: 07 4637 6270 PO Box 6243 Fax: 07 4632 8062 TOOWOOMBA WEST QLD 4350 Email: info@qmdc.org.au 23 June 2009 Consultation on Policy Options Endangered regrowth vegetation management in the Queensland Murray-Darling Basin (QMDB) The Queensland Murray-Darling Basin is subject to the Vegetation Management (Regrowth Clearing Moratorium) Act 2009. The Queensland Murray-Darling Committee (QMDC) Executive Committee is drafting a policy to provide the basis for a consistent response to regrowth vegetation management issues within the Basin. Endangered regrowth vegetation is important to landscape function, salinity risk abatement, increasing the extent of native vegetation coverage in the landscape, and has numerous social, cultural and economic values as well as environmental values. QMDC wants its landholder, community and organisational stakeholders to help develop this policy response to regrowth vegetation management in the Queensland Murray- Darling Basin. A draft is available online at www.qmdc.org.au. Hopefully, when finalised, this document will be used not just by QMDC but also other organisations as the region addresses the issues surrounding regrowth vegetation management across the Basin. The policy will provide a framework for the decision-making, risk management and response to the specific impacts on natural resources. It will ensure a consistent and robust position when working with communities, industry organisations, local government and state government on regrowth vegetation matters. Please review our first draft policy document and forward your comments and suggestions by the end of August 2009. Liz Todd, Policy and Planning Officer with QMDC, is available to discuss the policy with individuals or groups, or attend meetings at request, to enhance opportunities for meaningful consultation. Further information with regard to QMDC vegetation management is also available on our website (www.qmdc.org.au). We look forward to your input into a policy addressing regrowth vegetation management and its contribution to the region s natural resources. Regards, Peter Blundell Chairman Queensland Murray-Darling Committee Inc Further information and feedback to: Liz Todd, Policy and Planning Officer QMDC, PO Box 1078, Roma Qld 4455 Phone: 0429 056 452 Fax: 07 4622 6060 Email: lizt@qmdc.org.au Working together healthy landscapes, viable communities Page 1 of 1

Endangered regrowth vegetation management in the Queensland Murray-Darling Basin (QMDB) QMDC DRAFT Policy Options for Consultation 3 July 2009 Recommendations: 1. That the QMDC Executive Committee reviews for consultation the Endangered Regrowth Vegetation Policy 2. That the QMDC Executive Committee considers the proposed Principles and Mechanisms; and Is supportive of QMDC to pursue the delivery of these actions with the intention of influencing landholders, government and other stakeholders as a means of addressing the policy and principles. For further information and submissions to this draft contact: Liz Todd, Policy & Planning Project Support Officer PO Box 1078, Roma Qld 4455 Fax: 07 4622 6060 Phone: 0429 056 452 Email: lizt@qmdc.org.au QMDC_PolicyOptions_Endangered Regrowth Vegetation_Consultation_090703.doc 1

Policy Context The Queensland Murray-Darling Basin is subject to the Vegetation Management (Regrowth Clearing Moratorium) Act 2009. This legislation restricts the clearing of endangered regrowth vegetation for a period of at least three months (from 8 April 2009). During this time the State Government is consulting with stakeholders about the optimum way to regulate clearing of regrowth vegetation under the Vegetation Management Act 1999. The Queensland Murray-Darling Committee Inc. provided a submission to the Queensland Government on the Vegetation Management (Regrowth Clearing Moratorium) Act 2009. This submission was based on the draft policy document presented to the QMDC Executive Committee 5 May 2009. Following is a summary of the hectares of endangered regrowth vegetation presented at the catchment and shire scale across the Queensland Murray-Darling Basin. Catchment Sum of Hectares Balonne-Condamine 296,570 Border Rivers 169,198 Moonie 51,757 Warrego 22,069 Grand Total 539,594 Shire Sum Of Hectares Balonne Shire 144,011 Blackall Tambo Regional 1,962 Dalby Regional 71,922 Goondiwindi Regional 146,011 Murweh Shire 17,768 Paroo Shire 25 Roma Regional 113,670 South Burnett Regional 1,683 Southern Downs Regional 23,755 Toowoomba Regional 18,787 Grand Total 539,594 QMDC_PolicyOptions_Endangered Regrowth Vegetation_Consultation_090703.doc 2

Context Question: What are the potential issues associated with legislative restriction of clearing endangered regrowth vegetation? Issue identification Item Positive Negative Resource Condition Targets Practice Attitude Increased extent of endangered regrowth vegetation coverage to achieve RCT 4 Increased retention of regrowth for landscape function and value Salinity risk abatement Existing PMAV supported Long term potential for management of regrowth vegetation Opportunity to promote best management practice and provide incentives for actively managing regrowth Opportunity to pursue regional and sub-catchment planning of endangered regrowth management, including coordination of permits for management of threatening processes Value adding to regrowth already voluntarily managed for landscape and ecological value and function Opportunity for education on values and purpose/intent of legislation ie to protect values and function of endangered regrowth vegetation Not of concern and of concern regrowth vegetation at higher risk of clearing Condition and ecological health of native vegetation at risk due to change in attitude to management Non planned approach to landscape function and value of endangered regrowth vegetation Threatening processes at risk of not being managed Legislation only achieves minimum standard, not best management practices for regrowth vegetation Potential no further voluntary retention of not of concern and of concern regrowth vegetation Permits now required for active management of threatening processes (weed, pests, fire, thickening) Loss of economic opportunities, which may have included retention and management of vegetation Landholder distrust of government Panic clearing of other regrowth vegetation from fear of further tightening of legislation Non consultative with landholders Potential no willingness to participate in voluntary vegetation management and planning QMDC_PolicyOptions_Endangered Regrowth Vegetation_Consultation_090703.doc 3

Policy position In response to the Vegetation Management (Regrowth Clearing Moratorium) Act 2009, QMDC submits that: 1. The purpose of this Act would be optimally achieved by regulating clearing through a Regional Vegetation Management Planning process. 2. Restricting clearing of endangered regrowth vegetation without consultation or consideration of regionally relevant issues will undermine the intent of the Vegetation Management Act 1999. QMDC supports a range of principles and mechanisms (planning, education, incentive and legislative) to manage regrowth vegetation at a regional scale. QMDC_PolicyOptions_Endangered Regrowth Vegetation_Consultation_090703.doc 4

Principles Regional Natural Resource Management Plan 1. Regrowth management in the Queensland Murray-Darling Basin is based on the Resource Condition Targets (Regional NRM Plan, revised targets 2006). VB RCT3 By 2020, there is a ten percent increase in area of sustainably managed native vegetation for landscape and biodiversity outcomes through traditional and innovative economic uses, based on representative areas. VB RCT4 By 2020, the extent of endangered regional ecosystems across catchments with less than 30 percent remnant vegetation will be increased by ten percent of the 2001 mapped extent. VB RCT6 By 2010, areas of identified high nature conservation significance are maintained in current condition and improved against Common Nature Conservation Classification System 2003/2004 survey benchmarks. VB RCT8 By 2020, the biodiversity condition and ecological health of ten percent of the area of native vegetation in priority catchments are maintained or improved as measured against baseline conditions to be set by 2008. 2. Endangered regrowth vegetation is important to landscape function (including native vegetation coverage, ecosystem linkages, ecological processes and biodiversity condition) and salinity risk abatement in the Queensland Murray-Darling Basin, even though it is not recognised as remnant vegetation, in a way that achieves subcatchment planning at a landscape scale. 3. Retention and management of endangered regrowth vegetation is critical to increasing the extent of native vegetation coverage, especially in heavily-cleared landscapes, to achieve the Regional NRM Plan Resource Condition Targets, in particular RCT 4. 4. Environmental, social, cultural and economic values of endangered regrowth vegetation must be protected and sustained. Best Management Practices 5. Best management practices for endangered regrowth vegetation for the Queensland Murray-Darling Basin includes: a. Appropriate planning and design in the landscape, at the bioregion, regional, subcatchment and property scale; and b. Actively managing threatening processes. QMDC_PolicyOptions_Endangered Regrowth Vegetation_Consultation_090703.doc 5

Mechanisms Regional Vegetation Management Plans The Queensland Murray-Darling Committee supports the regulation of clearing of endangered regrowth vegetation through Regional Vegetation Management Plans or a similar process and intent. QMDC seeks a process where Regional Vegetation Management Plans (RVMP) are developed in partnership with the community and government and considered for advice and adoption by the Minister. The function of the Regional Vegetation Management Plans is to include modifications to departmental policy as well as strategies for action to protect biodiversity, avoid land degradation and maintain or enhance rural productivity. QMDC seeks modifications through the Regional Vegetation Management Planning process to include: Development of regionally relevant assessment codes for clearing approvals to suit local issues and priorities, consistent with the intent of the legislation Identification of local best practice for management of all vegetation, including regrowth Identification of strategies and actions that achieve outcomes that recognise the social, environmental and economic aspects of vegetation management Identification of appropriate incentives that recognise and encourage existing good practice Identification of areas of high nature conservation value, and areas vulnerable to land degradation Identification of opportunities for social and economic benefit through better vegetation management practices on both state and privately owned land Development of specialist codes of practice for activities such as sustainable forestry, woody weed management and fodder harvesting Determination of suitable timeframes for permit approvals and for reviewing plans and assessment codes, and Development of appropriate and equitable methods for application of financial incentives and other forms of support for public good vegetation management. QMDC_PolicyOptions_Endangered Regrowth Vegetation_Consultation_090703.doc 6

Planning The overall achievement of the Regional Vegetation Management Plan is to be consistent with and delivers against the Vegetation and Biodiversity Resource Condition Targets in the Regional Natural Resource Management Plan (QMDC, 2004). Planning activities are recognised at the bio-region, region, catchment, subcatchment, property and species levels and are supported through the planning process. Property vegetation management planning activities foster landscape or subcatchment scale outcomes. Vegetation reconfiguration proposals should be assessed across property boundaries within the same sub-catchment as part of a community landscape planning process. Property Maps of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) are recognised at all planning levels. Catchment and sub-catchment plans developed in partnership with landholders for all areas in the bio-region identify priority areas allow for trading and achieve a no net loss (overall biodiversity value) outcome, with clear guidelines/rules for trading defined. The plan/regulations should allow for the reconfiguration of retention areas on individual properties, aggregations or in sub-catchments. Landholders can develop plans for remnant, non remnant, regrowth, deep rooted native vegetation or plantations for inclusion in property vegetation management plans. The plan/regulations should provide for situations where a landholder may offer to retain areas of non remnant or regrowth vegetation in exchange for areas of remnant vegetation, on the basis of better or equal achievement of the purposes ie salinity prevention, biodiversity and overall regional ecosystem extent. Areas of salinity risk and less productive or poorer land systems (shallow, stony) are identified as priority areas to revert back to remnant vegetation and considered as part of overall sub-catchment vegetation assessments. Recovery plans for all endangered, vulnerable or rare flora and fauna species in the region are developed through several means including sub-catchment plans. QMDC_PolicyOptions_Endangered Regrowth Vegetation_Consultation_090703.doc 7

Threatening processes Planning activities at all levels should address threatening processes including: Retention and management of vegetation in priority salinity risk areas including critical recharge and discharge areas. Rehabilitation activities in existing salinity discharge areas and scalded areas. Management of erosion, monoculture and encroachment through thinning activities. Management of invasive plants and invasive animals through activities, including the use of thinning, fire and grazing pressure. Management of threatening processes associated with habitat fragmentation through addressing patches linkages and edge to area ratios. Threatening processes are addressed by local best management practices and provisions are made for the undertaking of such management activities, whereby threatening processes include: Thickening/encroachment Habitat fragmentation Monoculture Erosion Harbouring of invasive plants Harbouring of invasive animals Climate change Nutrient rundown Fire Biodiversity loss QMDC_PolicyOptions_Endangered Regrowth Vegetation_Consultation_090703.doc 8

Incentives QMDC supports the need for a range of incentive mechanisms for the retention and management of vegetation. Incentives could be provided and determined through the Regional Vegetation Management Planning process, including market-based, financial, technical and social incentives. Environmental stewardship program is promoted on a district/sub-catchment scale. Enterprise diversification programs developed and implemented to promote the most sustainable use of the region s natural resources, e.g. farm forestry. Economic advice is available to assist in the planning stage for optimising (not maximising) farm gross margins. Incentive schemes and financial assistance packages linked to accreditation schemes such as Environmental Management Systems (EMS) that promote and encourage ecologically sustainable management practices. Voluntary nature conservation agreements, including use of statutory covenants, accessible to landholders across the bioregion for protection of areas of high nature conservation values. Incentives should address public benefit and burden. Incentive schemes assist landholders to manage their properties as a business enterprise as well as managing areas for public benefit outcomes. Incentive mechanisms address real costs incurred or loss of production and opportunity such as management, monitoring, retirement of land, loss of market value and any other costs. Funding for targeted investment for landholders adversely affected by the retention of vegetation principally for public good. State legislation should not remove the tradability and fungibility of property rights of the landholder with respect to the current, prospective and/or future carbon offset/credit values associated with regrowth vegetation. QMDC_PolicyOptions_Endangered Regrowth Vegetation_Consultation_090703.doc 9

Education and extension QMDC plays a strong role in providing education and extension opportunities for the planning and management of vegetation in the region. This role, and similar roles of government departments and other non government organisations should be recognised and supported. Education opportunities promote and create awareness of the values of endangered regrowth vegetation. Extension of management guidelines at the sub-catchment and property level should be supported, including: Extension and training opportunities developed and implemented for whole of property planning and sub-catchment planning. Management guidelines developed and extended for areas of significant biodiversity value including riparian areas, wetlands, lakes and springs, high nature conservation regional ecosystems and important wildlife habitat areas. Extension of sustainable grazing management programs including total grazing pressure. Encourage landholders who have low vegetation retention rates (eg less than 20%) to restore and retain vegetation through voluntary participation. Endangered regional ecosystem extent increased through voluntary protection and management of regrowth. Of concern regional ecosystem extent increased to greater than 30% of pre clearing extent through voluntary protection and management of regrowth. QMDC_PolicyOptions_Endangered Regrowth Vegetation_Consultation_090703.doc 10