In-Process Inspection of Selective Laser Melting by Quantitative Optical Tomography

Similar documents
Transcription:

In-Process Inspection of Selective Laser Melting by Quantitative Optical Tomography A. Ladewig, J. Bamberg, G. Zenzinger, 42. MPA-Seminar, October 5th 2016 1

Outline Selective Laser Melting Quality Assurance Concept Online Monitoring by Optical Tomography Quantification of Optical Tomography Results 2

Selective Laser Melting Quality Assurance Concept Online Monitoring by Optical Tomography Quantification of Optical Tomography Results 3

From Powder to Part Trumpf, 3druck.com 4

SLM-Principle Build-up layer by layer 5

Additive Manufacturing @ MTU Additive Manufacturing @ MTU 6 production machines (M280) 1 technology machine (M290) total: 7 machines Materials IN718 MAR-M509 Stainless Steel 316L (Ti6Al4V) 6

Laser Melting The AM Machine Laser power: 400 W; Diameter: <100 µm Scanning speed: up to 7 m/s; typical 1 m/s Platform size 250x250 mm The AM Process Meltpool size ~ 100 µm High temperature gradients Powder size ~30 µm 7

Layer Build-up Layer thickness: 40 µm (IN718) Time for one layer varies depending on the part complexity 8

Final Parts Complex, hollow 3d-structures Up to 7000 layers Grinding wheel Fuel nozzle 9

Our Target: Aero-Engine-Parts Situation: - Aero-engines have a lot of complex shaped, hollow parts Opportunity: - Simplify manufacturing - Realize new designs Challenge: - High quality requirements 10

Selective Laser Melting Quality Assurance Concept Online Monitoring by Optical Tomography Quantification of Optical Tomography Results 11

Phases of Implementation Phase 3: New AM Design Manufacturing of functional structures to reduce weight and cost (bionic design) Phase 2: Substitution Cost effective manufacturing of raw parts Substitution of castings Phase 1: Tooling, Rig and Development Hardware Manufacturing of tooling, Rig- and development hardware 12

The Four Columns of Quality Assurance for SLM QA QA QA QA Raw Material / Powder Production- Line SLM-Process Final Part e.g. Particle Size Distribution e.g. Machine Calibration / Approval e.g. Layer Thickness e.g. Metrology and NDT: X-CT, FPI, VT 13

Problem: Lack-of-Fusion Defect SLM-process deviations can lead to lack-of-fusion defects Internal defect NO FPI 3D part geometry NO UT Too small compared to part thickness Metallographic Cross Section NO X-Ray Online Process Monitoring necessary! 14

Selective Laser Melting Quality Assurance Concept Online Monitoring by Optical Tomography Quantification of Optical Tomography Results 15

Principle of Optical Tomography Laser Camera Long time exposure of urban traffic traffic volume Brightness in the picture equals radiance x time Measurement for energy input / distance energy Long time exposure in additive manufacturing amount of heat 16

Data Generation scmos-camera thermal stabilized max 100 Hz 5 MegaPixel filter Noise reduction Image processing Online analysis 1 image / layer Up to 5000 images / part 17

Realization of Optical Tomography 18

OT Image Build-up 19

Features of Optical Tomography Geometry & Metrics Welding Parameters Process Deviations All of them with high lateral resolution (0.1 mm x 0.1 mm) Monitoring layer by layer without lack of data acquisition Optical 3D characterization of the complete SLM build job 20

Optical Tomography and Process Perturbation From 2d OT image stack by X-ray rendering software 2d OT image of boroscope bosses 3d OT image of a boroscope boss with indications due to process perturbation 21

Selective Laser Melting Quality Assurance Concept Online Monitoring by Optical Tomography Quantification of Optical Tomography Results 22

Build Jobs with Forced Process Perturbations Build jobs with 120 cylindrical specimens Each specimen with 10 localized process perturbations Process perturbation by Argon gas flow reduction Production of lack of fusion defects 23

OT Images of Process Perturbations High Resolution (up to 5 µm) Xray Lack of Fusion Correlation Many different indications Detail 3d-Image 24

Comparison of OT- and X-Ray Images 400 perturbated layers compared Algorithm developed using OT brightness values, size of indications and threshold value (signature) From In-Process Monitoring to In-Process Control H. U. Baron, A. Ladewig We.2.D.2 5 4 3 2 1 4 3 5 2 1 OT signature correlates to defect size down to 50 µm 1 3 2 4 5 25

Validation of X-Ray Images X-ray image of perturbated layer Metallographic cross-section Rupture test All X-ray indications confirmed 26

Selective Laser Melting Quality Assurance Concept Online Monitoring by Optical Tomography Quantification of Optical Tomography Results 27

Result I Correlation between OT-signature and defect size exists Probabilitiy of detection (POD) evaluated Sensitivity: 150 µm defect size @ 90/95% POD Automatic defect detection and classification developed Optical Tomography is now a quantitative inspection tool for lack of fusion defects. 28

Result II OT process control installed on all our SLM machines 100 % process control of all build jobs OT systems will be available commercially from EOS 29

Thank You for Your Attention! 30