Beehives or elephants? How should India drive its solar transformation?

Similar documents
Transcription:

Beehives or elephants? How should India drive its solar transformation? September 2014 Tobias Engelmeier Tobias.Engelmeier@bridgetoindia.com www.bridgetoindia.com Ajay Goel Ajay.Goel@tatapowersolar.com www.tatapowersolar.com

Challenges with the current scenario India needs to look beyond coal to ensure its energy security Issues with expanding coal based power infrastructure in India

Cost trends Cost of power from large scale solar is already at par with imported coal At the generation side, the cost of solar power for a utility scale project is already at par with the cost of power from imported coal. Solar power will also achieve parity with domestic coal by the year 2019. Even though storage is expensive, the cost of power with storage will likely become competitive with the cost of power from imported coal post 2017.

Scenario definition We have modeled four distinct scenarios for solar capacity addition in India Solar power is unique as it can be deployed in variety of forms ranging from distributed generation (residential & large rooftops) to centralized generation (utility scale & ultra-mega scale projects) Comparison of four scenarios of 25 GW each Distributed generation Centralized generation:

Potential for solar installation India can add up to 145 GW of solar over the next 10 years At 145 GW, solar could contribute about 13% to India s power generation in 2024. Most grid operators today consider 20% of power from intermittent sources like solar acceptable. We believe that the ceiling will rise substantially in the next ten years as grids become smarter. Therefore, we consider 13% generation from solar plausible. The 144 GW would be distributed across different gridconnected system types ( bees to elephants ). Distributed generation Total: 110-145 GW Centralized generation

LCOE vs. LCOP Economics of solar power should be evaluated at point of consumption than point of generation Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) Cost of evacuation of power Cost of land/ + rooftop lease T&D charges Cost of smart meters/ Commercial losses / + + + + and losses energy accounting theft of power Additional cost of balancing the grid Landed Cost of Power (LCOP) From the consumer s (and India s overall) perspective, what matters more is the LCOP at the point of consumption, rather than the LCOE

Cost trends Detailed modeling shows interesting cost trends for each scenario over next 10 years Large size projects are more cost effective today; however rooftops would witness steeper cost decline over next 10 years. LCOE for rooftops would fall by ~30% whereas that for utility scale by 17%. Gap between LCOP & LCOE is as high as Rs 2.00/unit for utility scale compared to Rs 0.20/ unit for rooftops, highlighting advantage of distributed gen. The gap between LCOP & LCOE would still remain at Rs 1.50 /unit for centralized projects after 10 years.

Job creation 6.75 Lakh total jobs can be created if 100 GW is implemented across the four scenarios Most jobs are created in the small rooftop market, which would see a large number of small installers and a very diverse value chain. Most solar jobs require the regular addition of new capacity to sustain. Jobs in ultra-mega projects will suffer most from project related ebbs and flows. The industry structure will be characterized by fewer (and probably more professional) players, the larger the project size.

Speed of deployment Speed of deployment is fastest for small rooftops and slowest for ultra mega projects For smaller rooftops, smaller size & captive roof space imply quicker deployment of systems that can be built in days. Large rooftops additionally require contractual agreements and thus system can be installed in few months. Utility scale projects need longer time for land acquisition & clearances, hence they can be installed in 6-8 months. Ultra mega projects require a couple of years of time frame for deployment; increased time required for planning, land acquisition, evacuation infrastructure development, financial closure, etc.

Implementation challenges Implementation challenges are minimum for utility scale projects due to already developed ecosystem Financing challenges are a common thread across all 4 scenarios. Small rooftop market is fragmented & disorganized and it needs to become more organized with standardized, ready for installation solutions. Things are broadly in place for utility scale projects as there is a proven track record; large rooftops are gaining pace with netmetering gradually coming in place. For ultra mega projects, the ecosystem needs to be developed esp. for land acquisition & transmission infra development.

Way Forward The country should focus on providing broad based support across scenarios Creating dependable solar policies to encourage investments & easy implementation process Similar to the diesel gen-set market, solar could become a default rather than a design market. Mindset of the regulators and policy makers needs to move away from the current school of thought where power gen. happens centrally. Existing regulations and policies need to be re-evaluated, with due importance given to generation being at the point of consumption. Financial Infrastructure Ease of business Regulation Incentives (GBI/ subsidy/ VGF) Setting up of green funds and solar/renewable focused NBFCs Single window clearance New substations Setting up of green corridors Weather and demand forecasting Demo projects in public places or government buildings Standards for system quality; Performance monitoring Stakeholder meetings Government backing of contracts to improve bankability Regulations for net-metering & smart grids implementation Long term clarity on regulatory & policy provisions

Thank you for your attention We are happy to support you in case there is any query