STORIES FROM AROUND THE WORLD

Similar documents
Transcription:

COMMUNITY ENERGY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STORIES FROM AROUND THE WORLD PETER GARFORTH, Garforth International LLC

A WORLD OF CITIES 3 BILLION URBAN CITIZENS

MAJORITY LIVE IN CITIES 2008 Urban Population passed 50%

INSATIABLE APPETITE FOR ENERGY Forecast to double by 2030

PERFECT ENERGY STORM WHEN FEARS COLLIDE Rising Prices Availability Climate Change Growing Risks Growing Opportunity

FROM RECENT QUEST WHITE PAPER INTEGRATION OF URBAN ENERGY SYSTEMS Up to 50% Reduction on Grid Loads

EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ENERGY PLANNING PRIORITIZED LOADING ORDER ENERGY EFFICIENCY IF YOU DON T NEED IT DON T USE IT Efficient existing and new homes and buildings Urban design for transport efficiency Local employment for commuting efficiency HEAT RECOVERY IT IT S ALREADY THERE USE IT Distributed combined heat and power Use existing waste heat Structure commercial sites to maximize waste heat use New Relationships New Rules

EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ENERGY PLANNING PRIORITIZED LOADING ORDER RENEWABLE OPTIONS IF IT MAKES SENSE, GO CARBON FREE Renewable electricity Photovoltaic, Wind, Hydro Renewable heat - Solar thermal, biomass, biogas Renewable heat and power biomass, biogas, waste-to-energy ENERGY DISTRIBUTION INVEST WHERE IT MAKES SENSE Flexible distribution electricity, gas, heating, cooling,. Accepts multiple fuels and energy conversion technologies Optimize local / regional investment choices New Relationships New Rules

SUCCESSFUL CEP IMPLEMENTATION COMMON FEATURES Leadership and community engagement Non partisan political long-term commitment Community engagement Transparency and outreach Education and awareness for all residents Consistent simple reporting of goals and progress World-class energy efficiency Sustained improvements Performance certifications Integrated utility approach Highly teamed combined responsibility Heating, cooling, electricity, gas. Leadership - Engagement - Integration

SUCCESSFUL CEP IMPLEMENTATION COMMON FEATURES Efficient conversion Co-generation Distributed generation electric and heat Multi-fuel strategy Fossil flexibility coal, gas, oil Renewable thermal solar, biomass, biogas, municipal waste, river/ocean cooling Zero carbon electric wind, solar, nuclear Strong trend to biomass Low-energy transport Urban design favouring cycling, two wheelers and walking Comfortable multi-modal modal mass-transit with priority routing Measures to favour low-emissions vehicles Magnet for business and academic excellence Continuous improvement raising the bar! Implementation Over Decades

LEADERSHIP & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

GUELPH 2007 COMMUNITY ENERGY PLAN SUPPORT CITY GROWTH CHALLENGE Leadership from Civic Consortium Mayor, Chamber of Commerce, Friends of Guelph, Guelph Developers Association, Guelph Hydro, Union Gas, School Boards, University of Guelph, Community members 50% Growth - 115,000 today; 180,000 in 2031 Sustainability - Community Value Global Best Practice benchmarks! Non-Partisan Engaged Community

GUELPH 2007 COMMUNITY ENERGY PLAN VISION AND GOALS Guelph will create a healthy, reliable and sustainable energy future by continually increasing the effectiveness of how we use and manage our energy and water resources Recognized as a location of choice for investment Variety of reliable, competitive energy, water and transport services will be available to all Energy use per capita and resulting greenhouse gas emissions will be less than the current global average Energy and water use per capita will be less than comparable Canadian cities All publicly funded investments will visibly contribute to meeting the four CEP goals Simple, Measurable, Eternal

GUELPH COMMUNITY ENERGY PLAN PRIORITIZED STRATEGIES 2008-2031 Above-Code efficiency standards All construction new and retrofit Energy Performance Label EU approach Required on all construction national pilot Transport efficiency Urban design and vehicle choices Heat recovery New district energy infrastructure for majority of city Renewables Biomass and Solar Photovoltaic in large scale Restructured multi-utility utility energy services supply company Changes needed to regulatory status-quo Immediate start on 4 Scale Projects Build scale areas that will eventually link across the city Tailored Solution Not a Buffet!

GETTING STARTED IN GUELPH INITIAL SCALE PROJECTS St Patrick s Ward & Downtown Form Project Teams Integrated Master Plans Prioritize implementation Interoperable systems Sized to interconnect University of Guelph York District South Industrial Lands

GUELPH COMMUNITY ENERGY PLAN AGGRESSIVE 2031 TARGETS Sector 2005 GWh e /yr 2031 GWh e /yr 2005 MWh e /cap 2031 MWh e /cap Residential 1,610 1,473 14.00 8.18 Commercial 1,046 1,076 9.10 5.98 Industrial 1,631 1,848 14.18 10.27 Transport 1,743 1,126 15.16 6.26 Total (Net) 6,030 5,523 52.44 30.68 Electrical conv. 2,445 612 21.26 3.40 Total (Gross) 8,475 6,135 74.04 34.08 Now the hard work starts!

GUELPH COMMUNITY ENERGY PLAN AGGRESSIVE 2031 TARGETS Population growth of 50% City energy use reduction 30% Energy per capita from 74 to 34 MWh e CO 2 Emissions from 12 to 5 tonnes/capita Now the hard work starts!

TRANSPARENCY AND OUTREACH

PORTLAND OREGON TRANSPARENT DATA AND COMMUNICATIONS Simple tracking measurements Long term Consistency and Clarity

PORTLAND OREGON TRANSPARENT DATA AND COMMUNICATIONS Underline Multiple Benefits Long term Consistency and Clarity

WORLD-CLASS EFFICIENCY

DENMARK RAISING THE BAR ON BUILDING EFFICIENCY Focus on efficiency Litre oil per m2 16 after 73 oil shock 14 12 Germany and rest of 10 Scandinavia followed 8 California Title 24 from 6 1978 followed similar il 4 2 pattern 0 Average existing buildings BR-82 BR-95 BR-2006 BR-2010 BR-2015 Passive house Heating Codes Codes regularly updated Annual heating reduced 80% to 30 kwh/m 2 since 1982 Energy Performance Labels Efficiency assured by performance labels New and used buildings Set stage for 400M People

EUROPEAN UNION POTENTIAL FOR BEST PRACTICE SHARING Data to Support Policy

EUROPEAN UNION ENERGY PERFORMANCE IN BUILDINGS Builds on Scandinavian, German experience 27 countries 400 M people Systematic updates Performance labeling Efficiency in Large Scale

HOMES AND BUILDING EFFICIENCY ENERGY PERFORMANCE LABELING All homes and buildings Certifies performance Available when sold or rented Low cost or no-cost Energy and greenhouse gas Current state of building Displayed in public buildings Independent certification Access to discount mortgage Create Market Driven Improvement

INTEGRATED UTILITY APPROACH DISTRIBUTED GENERATION RENEWABLE SUPPLIES

MANNHEIM CITY UTILITY INTEGRATED UTILITY MULTIPLE SOURCES Energy Zoning Population 311 thousand Home to major industries Integrated Multi-Utility Energy Multiple energy sources Multiple networks Integrated networks control Public-Private Utility Company 51% City Owned 49% Private Capital Benefits Local accountability Cooling, heat, electricity, steam, gas, water Minimize infrastructure duplication Optimized supply choices Multi-media Smart networks Competitive costs Optimization between media Business innovation Solar Wood Gas Waste Coal Micro CHP CHP CHP CHP CHP CHP Low cost clean - flexible

NEIGHBOURHOOD FLEXIBLE UTILITIES INTEGRATION AT LOCAL LEVELS MARKHAM CENTRE, ONTARIO Municipal Service Company District Heating and Cooling Stepwise growth plan Benefits Support sustainability values of City Captured key employer Lower cost for consumers Nodes for Future Growth?

NEIGHBOURHOOD FLEXIBLE UTILITIES INTEGRATION AT LOCAL LEVELS MARINA DISTRICT, TOLEDO, OHIO Private Service Company District heating with CHP 2,500 homes 200,000 m 2 retail/commercial Benefits Competitive advantage Lower cost for consumers Good investor returns Breakthrough environmental Nodes for Future Growth?

AALBORG INTEGRATION CREATES NEW OPPORTUNITIES Cement Heat Recovery Municipal Waste CHP Heating for 96% of City Coal fired CHP Low Cost Lower Impact

LOW ENERGY TRANSPORTATION

URBAN DEVELOPMENT MAJOR IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION ENERGY Suburban Nation Separation of work, living and play Longer commutes Low-density Few travel options Wide drivable roads Large areas for parking Developed by single use large subdivisions Attracts few large employers New Urbanism Work, play and living intermingled Shorter commutes Higher density Multi-modal travel choice Narrow walkable roads Parking integrated Developed a block or building at a time Attracts range of employers Tackles one third of urban energy use

BERLIN TRANSPORT INTEGRATED IN CITY ENERGY PLANNING Integrated Operation Timetables Routes Ticketing Integrated Planning Multi-modal journey times Multi-modal transit density Park-and-Ride Private Car Part of system Cost (dis) incentives Urban Zoning Core and Outer Environmental Zones Mixed used zoning Results - Targets CO 2 reduction by 22% by 2005 from 1990 2010 Target is 25% Light Rail Air Car Share Subway Taxi Bike Share Bus I-City Rail Feet

BERLIN TRANSPORTATION ENERGY POLICY EXAMPLES Multi-Modal M l Planning & Information Competitive Consumer Choices Policy Restrictions On Cars Reducing CO2 / Capita LEV-Only Zones from 2008

PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER

COPENHAGEN ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL OF EUROPE Triggered by 1970 s energy crisis 30 years of consistent implementation 2.6 tonnes/capita greenhouse gas Efficiency World leading building efficiency Energy Performance Labeling District heating / cooling Systematic expansion Energy zoning 2009 - Second Most Livable City

COPENHAGEN ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL OF EUROPE Fuel flexibility Multi-fuel cogeneration Coal, oil, gas, biomass Waste-to-Energy Wind and solar generation Transport Urban design for bike/walking Efficient trams/trains High Value Employment Energy engineering and services Sustainable architecture and construction European Environmental Agency..

URBAN CLIMATE & ENERGY PERFORMANCE OPPORTUNITIES FOR BEST PRACTICE SHARING City GHG City Pop (M) PERFORMANCE mt/cap Mt/cap Country GHG Mt/cap Guelph 0.1 12.2 22.6 Mannheim 0.3 5.0 11.7 Zürich 0.4 3.8 7.1 Many Factors Boston 0.6 14.0 21.7 Climate Washington 0.6 19.7 21.7 Lifestyle Stockholm 1.3 4.0 7.5 Economic Development Density Copenhagen 1.9 2.6 12.5 Urban design Vancouver 2.3 5.0 22.6 (BC 15.9) Building Efficiency Toronto 2.5 8.2 22.6 Heat recovery Utility integration Transport integration Fuel choices Fuel Flexibility Berlin 3.4 6.8 11.7 London 75 7.5 62 6.2 11.0 New York 8.3 7.1 21.7 Tokyo 12.8 4.8 10.7 Shanghai 18.8 8.1 3.9 Journey not a Destination!

THANK YOU ONLY USE WHAT YOU NEED, WHEN YOU NEED IT, IN THE AMOUNT NEEDED!