Fatigue Risk Management Systems Regional Meeting GOL FRMS Implementation May 27 May 28, 2015 Lima, Peru
Summary a step back Numbers & Demand What were we doing? Current Status Back to the Basics Lessons Learned Survey Next Steps Electronic Flight Bag TOD Survey AQD Mobile Fatigue Report Form
a step back
Numbers & Demand 1900ral Fatigue Analysis 2014 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral 1900ral Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dez Total: 1.576 ASR
Numbers & Demand Fatigue Analysis Result 2014 14% 3% 13% Objective Fatigue Subjective Fatigue Nothing Identified Not Analyzed 70% Total: 1.576 ASR
What were we doing? Safety reporting culture; FRMS Implementation; Policy and Documentation; Classroom and E learning.
What were we doing? Safety ReportingCulture 6000 5000 1910ral 4000 3000 2000 1907ral 1907ral Others FRMS 1000 1904ral 0 1905ral 1905ral 1905ral
What were we doing? FRMS Implementation TIMELINE PHASE I: Planning PHASE II: Implement Reactive PHASE III: Implement Proactive and Predictive FRMS PHASE IV: Implement FRMS Safety Assurance Process Gap Analysis Policy and Documentation CHAPTER THREE Identification of fatigue Hazards Risk Assessment Risk Mitigation strategies CHAPTER FOUR Identification of fatigue Hazards Risk Assessment Risk Mitigation strategies CHAPTER FOUR Monitoring of FRMS performance Managing Organizational & Operational changes Continuous improvement CHAPTER FIVE DEVELOP and IMPLEMENT FRMS DOCUMENTATION Chapter Three DEVELOP and IMPLEMENT FRMS COMMUNICATIONS Chapter Six DEVELOP and DELIVER FRMS TRAINING Chapter Six
What were we doing? FRMS Implementation TIMELINE PHASE I: Planning PHASE II: Implement Reactive PHASE III: Implement Proactive and Predictive FRMS PHASE IV: Implement FRMS Safety Assurance Process Gap Analysis Policy and Documentation CHAPTER THREE Identification of fatigue Hazards Risk Assessment Risk Mitigation strategies CHAPTER FOUR Identification of fatigue Hazards Risk Assessment Risk Mitigation strategies CHAPTER FOUR Monitoring of FRMS performance Managing Organizational & Operational changes Continuous improvement CHAPTER FIVE DEVELOP and IMPLEMENT FRMS DOCUMENTATION Chapter Three DEVELOP and IMPLEMENT FRMS COMMUNICATIONS Chapter Six DEVELOP and DELIVER FRMS TRAINING Chapter Six
What were we doing? Policy anddocumentation Policy Documentation Identifies FRMS elements Identifies FRMS operations Reflects Shared Responsibility States Safety objectives Declares management commitment Identifies lines of accountability Policy and objectives Processes and procedures Accountabilities, responsibilities and authorities Mechanism for involvement of all stakeholders FRMS training records Planned and actual times worked Outputs
What were we doing? Classroom and e Learning Subject dealt in class to all crewmembers and crew planners. Use our existing training structure: CRM Corporate Research Management TEM Threath and Error Management Periodical Training e Learning
What were we doing? Classroom and e Learning
Current Status
Back to the Basic FRMS & SMS; DOC 9966 FRMS Implementation Guide Fatigue Safety Action Group (FSAG); Bio mathematical Models.
Back to the Basic FRMS & SMS FRMS & SMS; DOC 9966 FRMS Implementation Guide
Back to the Basic FRMS & SMS SMS Framework FRMS 1. Safety policy and objectives 2. Safety risk management 3. Safety assurance 4. Safety promotion 1. Safety policy and objectives 2. FRM processes 3. FRMS safety assurance processes 4. FRMS promotion processes
Back to the Basic FSAG Lack of FSAG on 2014; Re started with the new year; All envolved areas invited: Safety Management; Schedule Management; Flight Operations; Flight Standarts; Medical Department.
Back to the Basic Bio mathematical Models Review the use of the Fatigue Avoidance Scheduling Tool (FAST); Request feedback from changes proposed; Identify which situations are not covered.
Lessons Learned As Low as Reasonable Possible (ALARP); Bio mathematical Models are not the FRMS; Develop Safety Performance Indicators (SPIs); Data collection is necessary.
Lessons Learned ALARP How much is it costing? Don t forget the M in FRMS; Make things more personal.
Lessons Learned Bio mathematical Models are not the FRMS Look to all the roster; Search for improvement possibilities. There will be critical operations; It s not a GO/No GO tool; It s not a shadow over the common sense.
Lessons Learned Bio mathematical Models are not the FRMS
Lessons Learned Develop SPIs Look to all the roster; We need to find our threshold; Total hours below the threshold; Pairing/Roster Comparisons ;
Lessons Learned Data collection is necessary. Review our database; Too much useless info; Too much unused info; Too much missed info; Expand our coverage area; Maintain the current reactive process; Field survey.
Survey
Survey Methodology Test; Demografic Data; Morningness eveningness questionnaire Epworth sleepiness scale Subjective Fatigue Forms; Samn Perelli Sleep LOG Objective Analysis; FAST & CFAS Comparison
Survey
Next Steps
Electronic Flight Bag TOD Survey Available in all flights; Pairing evaluation; Quick Response; Pairing Crew members Development in Company.
AQD Mobile Fatigue Report Form Works in any smartphone/tablet; Off line (transfers info when conected); Get the information where it happens; Assure the quality of gathered data.
Thank You! Safety Management frms@golnaweb.com.br