COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 October /09 ENV 673 AGRI 435 DEVGEN 275 PI 98 FORETS 100 ONU 82 PECHE 276

Similar documents
Biodiversity Conservation, Ecosystem Services and Poverty Reduction

6125/18 MF/eb 1 DGC 1C

6981/17 YML/ik 1 DG C 1

Chair s conclusions. The Chair summarised the discussions as follows and will forward his conclusions to the summit chair.

A pressing challenge !"#$%&

Delegations will find attached the Council conclusions on Climate Diplomacy as adopted at the 3673rd meeting of the Council on 18 February 2019.

CBD & National Accounting Systems

Council of the European Union Brussels, 3 December 2015 (OR. en)

The Millennium Declaration Review WWF Recommendations to EU Heads of State

12901/18 JV/bsl 1 TREE.1.B

Chair s Summary Siracusa Environment Ministerial Meeting

Chair s Summary G8 Environment Ministers Meeting. Kobe, Japan May 24-26, 2008

General Secretariat Delegations Rio+20: Outcome and follow-up to the UNCSD 2012 Summit - Council conclusions

Tenth session of the United Nations Permanent Indigenous Issues (UNPFII)

Chair s Summary of Kobe Biodiversity Dialogue 2009/10/15-16

30.X CLIMATE CHANGE - Council conclusions. The Council adopted the following conclusions: "The Council of the European Union,

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE REVISION OF THE CBD STRATEGIC PLAN

Action Plan for Biodiversity Research in Europe European Platform for Biodiversity Research Strategy Aims Background

Submission by the EU and its Member States to CBD Notification :

Outcome of the Bali Conference on Climate Change

6842/12 SH/mp 1 DG I

Agenda Item 11.1: Advice on REDD+

Setting the scope of the workshop

Ref.: SCBD/OES/AD/ October 2009 NOTIFICATION. Kobe Biodiversity Dialogue in 2009

15241/16 LS/ah 1 DGB B1

KILLARNEY DECLARATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH

Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 October 2017 (OR. en)

Revised mapping of the CITES Strategic Vision: objectives and the Aichi Targets in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity

Bio + Diversity = Biodiversity

Introduction to REDD+ Briefing EUREDD. Facility

CBD. Distr. GENERAL. UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/17 29 October 2010 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

Declaration of the 3rd ASEM Environment Ministers Meeting April

Harmonizing Gender in the Three Rio Conventions and the GEF

and synergistic action in achieving the 1.5 C goal. With the adoption of the Katowice climate package at COP 24, the world entered a new era,

A. Proposals for the integration of climate-change activities within the programmes of work of the Convention

A AFRICA EU DECLARATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE

12807/16 MS/ach 1 DG E 1B

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS NINTH MEETING

United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre

Economic and Social Council

12255/17 LS/ik 1 DGB 1B

SUBMISSION BY DENMARK AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

CRITERIA FOR SELECTING COUNTRY AND REGIONAL PILOTS UNDER THE FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM

Let me start by thanking Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) for so clearly focusing on the link between forests and climate change.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 13 May /11 AGRI 370 RECH 112 ENV 360 DEVGEN 142 ALIM 8 NOTE

10370/17 YML/ik 1 DG C 1

Comments on behalf of the European Union and its Member States On Possible Outcomes of the 4 th United Nations Environment Assembly

DAILY PROGRAMME OCTOBER, 2010

UN Strategic Plan for Forests Preparations of UNFF-12 session. Tomáš Krejzar UNFF-12 Bureau member for EEG

14554/18 YML/ik 1 RELEX.1.B

FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM DESIGN DOCUMENT. (Prepared by the Forest Investment Program Working Group)

Bringing the Ecosystem Services Concept into international policy: Experiences and reflections on The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB)

Key conservation policies and their targets

The Ocean Pathway. A Strategy for the Ocean into COP23 Towards an Ocean Inclusive UNFCCC Process

T h e E c o n o m i c s o f E c o s y s t e m s & B i o d i v e r s i t y

COMMITTEE ON FORESTRY

Council conclusions: "A New Energy Policy for Europe" Contribution of the Energy Ministers to the 2006 Spring European Council

Resolution XI.14. Climate change and wetlands: implications for the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

Press Release. Governments Commit to Significant Funding Increase and Accelerated Action to Achieve Biodiversity Targets and Sustainable Development

Revised note on Selection criteria and possible themes for the Fourth Session of the UN Environment Assembly

GENERAL ASSEMBLY INFORMAL THEMATIC DEBATE: CLIMATE AS A GLOBAL CHALLENGE. Summary

136 th IPU Assembly. Reports on recent IPU specialized meetings #IPU136. Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1-5 April Item 7 13 February 2017

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS ELEVENTH MEETING

Introduction to The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB)

8954/18 YML/ik 1 DG C 1B

Strategy for the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI)

EU Environment Policy

13070/17 ATR/cm 1 DGE 1A

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Living well, within the limits of our planet

Background. Q1: Why is biodiversity important for sustainable development? KEY MESSAGES (Revised June 11 th, 2013)

developing countries that manage to reduce this source of emissions at a national level.

Resolution XI.3. Adjustments to the Strategic Plan for the triennium

CBD. Distr. GENERAL. UNEP/CBD/COP/11/24 24 August 2012 ** ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

International Youth Statement on Biodiversity

Attracting funding from the private sector: innovative financial instruments in the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE

by 2010 or beyond and what are the implications for the Convention on Biological Diversity?

Strategic line 1. Improve sustainable production of goods and services by Mediterranean forests EXPECTED RESULTS

Draft co-chairs conclusions. Petersberg Climate Dialogue IX Changing together for a just transition. Berlin, 19 June 2018

III The Elements 1. Ecological civilization adding a political and cultural dimension to sustainable

Sustainable Development Goal 15: Progress and Prospects

NATURE CONSERVATION BEYOND 2010

The Bali Action Plan: Suggestion to move forward COSTA RICA - EL SALVADOR - HONDURAS NICARAGUA - PANAMA

8286/19 YML/ik 1 RELEX.1.B

FRANCE CANADA CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENT PARTNERSHIP

Questions & answers to understand what is at stake and how we are responding

JOINT STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Synopsis of the outcome of the consultation on international ocean governance. Accompanying the document

EU Biodiversity Policy Workhop Policy and Advocacy for NGOs June 2010, Belgrade Duška Dimović, WWF. Earth Hour 2010 Review

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS TENTH MEETING

Bolivia. REDD+ Country Profile. May Forest and Climate Initiative / WWF-Germany FACTSHEET Introduction

REDD+ Safeguards and Safeguard Information Systems

COMMITTEE ON FORESTRY

Joint Statement issued at the conclusion of the. Eighth BASIC Ministerial Meeting on Climate Change. Inhotim, Minas Gerais.

Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. Land Degradation Neutrality Targets for Sri Lanka

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. on an EU Forest Action Plan

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [on the report of the Second Committee (A/64/420/Add.6)] 64/203. Convention on Biological Diversity

Transcription:

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 12 October 2009 14372/09 ENV 673 AGRI 435 DEVGEN 275 PI 98 FORETS 100 ONU 82 PECHE 276 NOTE from : to : Subject : General Secretariat Delegations High-level meeting: Visions for Biological Diversity beyond 2010 - People, Ecosystem Services and the Climate Crisis (Strömstad, Sweden, 7-9 September 2009) - Information from the Presidency Delegations will find annexed a note from the Presidency on the above subject, which will be dealt with under "other business" at the meeting of the Council (Environment) on 21 October 2009. 14372/09 IH/cm 1 DG I EN

ANNEX High-level meeting: Visions for Biological Diversity beyond 2010 - People, Ecosystem Services and the Climate Crisis (Strömstad, Sweden, 7-9 September 2009) - Information from the Presidency - The high-level meeting Visions for Biological Diversity beyond 2010 - People, Ecosystem Services and the Climate Crisis (Strömstad, 7-9 September 2009) was organised by the Swedish Ministry of the Environment. Approximately 130 delegates from 21 EU Member States and Norway, as well as representatives of the European institutions and bodies, and the members of the Bureau of the Convention on Biological Diversity, attended the conference. The purpose of the conference was to intensify the EU's preparations for the strategic international discussions and negotiations on biological diversity, in the run-up to the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity in October 2010. The main topics for discussion were: How can the economic value of ecosystem services be included in economic models and strategies for sustainable development? How can we build a relationship between ecosystems and society that is resilient to threats from climate change and other global environmental challenges? How can we use the new global vision for biodiversity and the Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity to support the coherence and efficiency of global governance of biodiversity and ecosystem services? 14372/09 IH/cm 2 ANNEX DG I EN

The Chairman of the Conference, Minister Andreas Carlgren, underlined the economic value of biological diversity and stressed the need to cooperate to reach bold agreement in the United Nations in 2010. The study leader of the project "The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity", Director Pavan Sukhdev, explained the expected consequences of climate change for the economic returns from ecosystem services. He pointed out that investments in biological diversity give high returns and are crucial to climate change mitigation and adaptation. Statements by the main sponsors of TEEB, Commissioner Stavros Dimas and Director Jochen Flasbarth of Germany, further underlined the economic consequences of biodiversity degradation, and also stressed the moral obligation to safeguard biodiversity and people s livelihoods. The Executive Secretary of the CBD, Dr Ahmed Djoghlaf, emphasised the need to enhance public awareness. Director General James Leape of WWF International and Managing Director James Griffiths of the World Business Council on Sustainable Development underlined the urgency of reaching an agreement on targets for biodiversity beyond 2010. Andreas Carlgren and Minister Elena Espinosa of Spain expressed the need for close cooperation between the current and future Presidencies in order to formulate strategic principles and an EU commitment during 2010. The conclusions from the conference will complement the available basis for Council conclusions on International Biological Diversity in December 2009. The documentation from the conference will be available at the Swedish Presidency website at www.se2009.eu/biodiversity. The website will also serve as a communication tool that can help build and communicate a deeper understanding of the economic and social importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services. 14372/09 IH/cm 3 ANNEX DG I EN

Annex to the ANNEX Conference Conclusions 1. A common European understanding is emerging from our different cultures, politics and past, recognizing that the loss of nature s capital will, in the long term, have far more severe consequences than today s financial crisis. The loss of biodiversity, as well as the services and cultural values it provides, is taking us to one of the worst extinction periods in the history of the Earth. Investments in protection and restoration of biodiversity build natural capital, generate continuously high net returns and counteracts the economic impact of climate change. 2. Our endeavours to achieve poverty alleviation, economic growth and protection of biodiversity are all interlinked and must be pursued in an integrated effort. 3. Since most of the biodiversity and ecosystem services is impacted by land use it is of utmost importance that we move towards sustainable use in all sectors and areas. Therefore, the international community must develop a bold and cross-sectoral vision, set ambitious international action oriented targets for biodiversity and ecosystem services as a cornerstone for sustainable development and for reaching the Millennium Development Goals. 4. There are high expectations from European citizens and the international community that the EU shows strong leadership on the international biodiversity arena. Proactive leadership builds on a solid knowledge base, powerful ideas, strong commitments and the willingness to work with and listen to the needs of other countries and stakeholders. 5. The Carta di Siracusa on Biodiversity and the Message from Athens provide essential contributions to the development of strategic principles for the EU's active participation in deliberations at global level on biodiversity beyond 2010. The international year of biodiversity 2010 gives us an arena where the political momentum can be built up to the special session of the United Nations General Assembly in September 2010 and the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP 10) in Nagoya, Japan, October 2010. 14372/09 IH/cm 4

Strategic Principles The economics of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Fully integrate the economic value of ecosystem services in economic systems, in national accounting, policy assessments as well as in strategies for sustainable development. Make full use of the contribution of ecosystem services to an eco-efficient economy, recognising the value of natural capital as a foundation of economies and well-being 6. By better defining the economic value of biodiversity we become better equipped to sustainably use ecosystem services, and to increase their capacity in the long term. This will enable us to live from the returns of the ecosystem services without eroding the natural capital. 7. The TEEB study provides crucial information contributing to the development of new visions, targets and policies that takes full account of the economic value of ecosystem services and biodiversity. 8. New tools should be developed, to enable all countries to integrate the economic value of their natural capital and develop extended accounts which can support integration of ecosystem services in national budgeting. These tools may include, for example, green public procurement, reforming economic incentives, fiscal shift correcting prices to better reflect real values, payment for ecosystem services, investments in protected areas systems, green infrastructure and biodiversity offsets. 9. Indicators will be needed in order to follow the status of ecosystem services and the economic consequences of their decline. 10. The international regime on access and benefit sharing must be completed at CBD COP 10. The economic returns from the use of genetic resources should be shared in accordance with applicable international law. 14372/09 IH/cm 5

Ecosystem services, climate change and sustainable development: Build societies and manage ecosystems to become resilient to threats from climate change and other global environmental challenges, recognising that biodiversity is key for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Manage ecosystems and securing biodiversity as an integral part of the fight against poverty. 11. Managing biological diversity is a matter of survival for all humanity, a prerequisite for human well-being and a basis for development. However, since a great number of the world s poor are more directly dependent on ecosystem services, they are more vulnerable to erosion of biological diversity. 12. Biodiversity is key for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Maintaining healthy ecosystems, resistant to stress, and avoiding non-reversible damage, is necessary for securing economic growth and reaching the Millennium Development Goals in the face of resource depletion and global environmental challenges. 13. In an eco-efficient economy, the future development needs to be maintained within the ecological boundaries of the planet. Dangerous threshold effects must be identified in time to avoid crossing such boundaries. 14. We must promote governance that learns from experience and adapts to change, in order to deal with dynamic social and ecological systems. The institutional frameworks must be reformed to enable collaborative and adaptive ecosystem based management. 15. Bridging organisations, such as advisory boards, community fora, NGOs, neutral brokers or science-policy interfaces, are key to improving ecosystem management and to deal with conflicting interests. Strategic long term planning improves the possibilities for active involvement of local communities. 16. Market forces and private capital needs to be mobilized for investments in green infrastructure, protection of biodiversity and the use of ecosystem services that sustainably maintains and build up the natural capital. 14372/09 IH/cm 6

17. We need to develop and implement ecosystem based approaches to address climate change and biodiversity loss. Such approaches can include, for example, carbon capture, regulation of water flows, water purification, maintenance of fishing nurseries, protection against soil erosion and landslides, regulation of local climate and mitigating the effect of extreme weather events and forest fires. 18. The impact of European consumption on global biodiversity needs to be addressed. A new global vision for biodiversity: Support the coherence and efficiency of global governance of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Link the biodiversity, climate change and development agendas more closely together. 19. The establishment of a long term vision should be promoted. The vision should be complemented by short term measurable and action oriented targets acting as milestones. 20. The new vision should enhance awareness and should be easily understood by all stakeholders, including policy makers, business and the general public. 21. The vision and targets should address the drivers of biodiversity loss and promote integration of biodiversity and ecosystem services measures into relevant sectoral and cross-sectoral policies, programs and strategies as well as in planning processes. Therefore, sectors should adopt specific targets for biodiversity and ecosystem services. 22. The global forest cover loss should be halted by 2030 at the latest and gross tropical deforestation should be reduced by at least 50% by 2020 compared to current levels. Enhanced incentives for action on REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) should therefore be created. Action in this area enables developing countries to take more active part in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and as such, help building a bridge between developed and developing countries. 14372/09 IH/cm 7

23. A successful outcome of UNFCCC CP 15 in Copenhagen, December 2009, is crucial for securing biodiversity and ecosystem services in the future. Ecosystem services will in turn be decisive for successfully implementing climate change policy. The new climate change regime and the vision for biodiversity must be able to support synergies between climate change, biodiversity policies and the development agenda, including rights of indigenous peoples and local communities. The REDD+ mechanism should be designed to support such synergies. 24. There are good opportunities in combining policies, programmes and incentives reducing emissions of greenhouse gas emissions from all types of land-use with restoring or securing biodiversity and ecosystem functions, thereby creating win-win solutions. 25. As conditions vary greatly between and within countries, the global governance framework must allow the flexibility necessary to adapt to local and changing conditions. Local involvement in management of ecosystem services is instrumental for sustainable economic development, and in the fight against poverty. 26. Implementation and follow up to the targets will require an improved knowledge base. Therefore, it is crucial to conclude negotiations on an Intergovernmental science-policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) in time for CBD COP 10. 27. The wide recognition of the existing 2010 biodiversity target teaches us that targets need to be quantitative and time-bound in order to stimulate political interest. This has to be taken into account when mechanisms for monitoring future targets are established. 28. Progress has to be measureable, implying the necessity to specify a baseline for reference. Biodiversity indicators need to have a broad acceptance in all relevant sectors and should efficiently relate to targets. The ongoing work on indicators should be coordinated with the process of developing new biodiversity targets. By this procedure, CBD COP 10 will be able to adopt an operative package of targets and indicators. 14372/09 IH/cm 8