Deliberative Draft

Similar documents
Four Seasons Produce Business Partners November 27, 2018

Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0523, Product Tracing Systems for Food

Repack/Commingling Case Best Practices

RE: PETITION FOR REGULATIONS TO ADDRESS PRODUCE SAFETY

Ed Treacy Vice President, Supply Chain Efficiencies Produce Marketing Association

FRESH FRUIT LABELING MANUAL

New entrants and product substitution are intensifying competition in the

ROMAINE LETTUCE IS BACK

ROMAINE LETTUCE IS BACK

FMI Antitrust Statement

Filling in the: G ood A gricultural P ractices

Best Practices in Food Traceability

Produce Traceability Initiative GTIN Case Code Assignment Strategy

Issue Date: December 20, 2006 Farm Bureau

Glazed Seafood Weight Indication Guidance

DOCUMENT REFERENCE Code :OMN1000 Date :20/05/10 Page :1/5

1. Issues that need more clarity so that everyone has a better understanding of compliance; and

Traceability. Presented by Ray Connelly. truetrac.com

Food Marketing Institute. Food Marketing Institute

practices for leafy greens. We have used the headings of the FDA draft guidance to organize our comments as appropriate.

Leveraging PTI Information for Improving FRESHNESS! October 19, 2017

BA P. Logo Use Guide. ..org

Leveraging PTI Information for Improving FRESHNESS! September 25, 2017

Defining Food Safety. Food Safety. Food safety is a scientific. preparation, and storage of food in ways that prevent foodborne

Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities Rules)

Frontera CEO discusses company s role in listeria outbreak

VOLUME 5 ISSUE 3 AMBER WAVES ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE/USDA

Part 2 Field Harvest and Packing. Field Sanitation and Hygiene (55 pts.) Field Harvesting and Transportation (130 pts.) 185 Points Possible

Idaho Grower Shipper Association. September 2, 2009

Whether a Poultry Slaughter or

How is this crop irrigated?

Marketing Regulations Resource Kit for Nova Scotia Farmers

Egg Products Inspection Verification

Industry Implementation Protocol For Case Date Coding Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - Fall 2011

CA Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement & Marketing Order

Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling of Beef, Pork, Lamb, Chicken, Goat Meat, Wild and Farm-raised Fish and Shellfish,

Keller and Heckman LLP Serving Business through Law and Science

Can-Trace Multi-Ingredient Working Group White Paper

National Animal Identification System (NAIS)

Laws and Regulations. Valuation. Assists

YUMA AREA AGRICULTURE. Mr. William J. Moody

MEMORANDUM. USDA Guidelines Implementing Country of Origin Labeling Provisions in the 2002 Farm Bill

The Proposed Safe Food for Canadians Regulations (SFCR) Information Session

White Paper: Food Safety Enforcement and Inspection Actions and Terminology

RE: Proposed Rule Questions Under Consideration for GMO Disclosure and Labeling

Produce Industry IT Standards Association (PIITSA) Revision PALLET CARD SPECIFICATION

Suppliers to the Australian Food Manufacturing Industry

Michelle Wright Consulting, LLC Regulatory & Labeling Consulting for the Food Industry. GMO Labeling PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE

JIFSAN Symposium Communication Scenario April 5, 2016

MSC Chain of Custody Standard: Consumer-Facing Organisation (CFO) Version

Foodservice. Implementation Guideline for Case-Level Traceability Using GS1 Standards

Arizona Leafy Greens: Economic Contributions of the Industry Cluster Economic Contribution Analysis Ashley Kerna Dari Duval George Frisvold

GAPS, FSMA and the Produce Rule

Weight Control Simplified

COOL Compliance for Beef Operations Ron Lemenager, Matt Claeys, and Allen Bridges Purdue University, Department of Animal Sciences

January 8, Dear Valued Customer:

STEP BY STEP INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILLING OUT FEDERAL AND STATE SPECIAL CLAIMS APPLICATIONS

Zone E Kohl s PO Number Style Number color size total units (if Prepack, total units by size and color)

SYSCO PRODUCE QUALITY ASSURANCE AND FOOD SAFETY

How to Implement Fresh Produce Traceability and Reduce Operating Costs

Starting on the Right Track

Best Practices in Food Traceability

Argentina. Brazil. California. Chile. Mexico. New Zealand. Peru. South Africa. Spain. Uruguay

Presentation Overview Regional Food Hubs

Improved Food Inspection Model The Case for Change

MSC Chain of Custody Standard: Default Version

The growing local and sustainable food movements have spurred new opportunities for family farmers, food processors, and rural and urban businesses.

Traceability Recordkeeping: A Public Health Vulnerability

FUNDAMENTAL FORCES AFFECTING THE U.S. FRESH BERRY AND LETTUCE/LEAFY GREEN SUBSECTORS

Raw Material Quality & Integrity

GS1 US Bill of Lading (BOL)

A division of the Wyoming Department of Agriculture

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC AVAILABILITY OF QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS EXPORT CERTIFICATION

GS1 Canada Barcoding Guidelines:

PMA/CPMA Technology and Standards Glossary of Terms

Top of Mind Regulatory Issues. Norm Robertson VP, Regulatory Services The Meat Institute February 1, 2017, IPPE

Lenovo Global Labeling Guide

Safe Food for Canadians Regulations : Getting Started

DEVELOPMENT OF A RECALL PLAN

Hazard Analysis Worksheet

Article 5. Electricity Generation Source Disclosure

USING BARCODE FOR SEAFOOD PROCESSING

Product Code Date Labeling Implementation Guide

Agricultural Outlook Forum 2004 Presented Friday, February 20, 2004

Regional Land Use Planning. Guidelines on what to expect from the Government of the Northwest Territories 2016

The Proposed Safe Food for Canadians Regulations. Clarice Lulai Angi. Konferencija o sigurnosti I kvaliteti hrane Opatija, Croatia May 2017

Organic Supply Chain Ensuring organic integrity through the Organic Control System. USDA Agricultural Marketing Service National Organic Program

Pecan Production and the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

GS1 Fresh Foods and Upstream GTIN Allocation Rules Standard. GTIN Allocation Rules for the Fresh Foods and Upstream Sectors

WHOLE FOODS MARKET GMO Labeling Policy

Date Marking The best before date marking on product labels with a short shelf life is a vital piece of information for consumers.

Selling Shell Eggs to Retailers, Wholesalers, and Food Service Facilities in Maryland

F O O D T R A C E A B I L I T Y G U I D A N C E

Conference. September 21, 2009

Produce Traceability Initiative Best Practices for Product Substitutions

Helping you keep our pets healthy and active

IMPORTANT! Always send a label proof to the VOF office for review and approval prior to having it printed.

Primary Authority Assured Advice

Roythornes Solicitors. FIR Implementation how the sector fared

Cilantro/Salmonella recall July 20, 2009

Transcription:

Questions & Answers on Voluntary Romaine Growing Region/Harvest Date Labelling March 1, 2019 **** this is a draft that is still being reviewed by the Romaine Task Force, as reflected by the inclusion of comments highlighting some areas of continued discussion; additional updates will be available and industry comment will be sought before this document is finalized**** This questions and answer document, originally drafted by PMA and United Fresh using the information available from FDA (commissioner statement and update) and CDC, has been updated as an outcome of a discussion with a cross-section of the fresh produce industry charged with providing industry guidance for this voluntary program. Mission: To provide consumers easy access to information of growing regions and harvest dates associated with romaine products. Vision: This is an interim step until better traceback mechanisms are in place. 1. What products are covered by this label? At this time, labels should be applied to romaine lettuce including processed blends containing mature or baby romaine lettuce. 2. Does the labeling program apply to other leafy greens? Not at this time. 3. Is this a new regulation from FDA? No, the use of this new label is a voluntary but is encouraged by FDA. 4. What should the label (for both field packed and processed romaine) say? a. Romaine: (region(s)) Harvest: (date). The date should be selected based on the earliest harvest date associated with romaine. b. For indoor growers, the information in 1a should be preceded by the phrase: Indoor grown 5. What if product contains romaine from multiple growing regions and/ or harvest dates? If product is commingled and contains romaine harvested from multiple regions, then an and statement should be included or the regions should be separated by a comma; e.g. Romaine: (region), (region) and if commingled with different harvest dates, the printed date should represent the earliest harvest date: Harvest: (date). Labeling should be accurate and could include the use of an and/or declaration if romaine from multiple growing regions is in the product. 6. Do we have to use the label? No, this is a voluntary effort. However, if there are outbreaks in the future associated with romaine, FDA and CDC may advise consumers that they should look for/ ask for this information when purchasing or eating romaine to ensure that the available romaine is not from growing regions that could be associated with the outbreak. In addition, they are likely to advise consumers to avoid romaine products that do not have the growing region/harvest date information. Deliberative Draft 2-28-2019 1

7. I grow and/or ship bulk romaine for regional processing. Do I have to label anything? No, the voluntary labeling initiative is aimed at communicating the growing region and harvest date of the product to consumers. However, in order for your customer (the processor) to label their product with this information, it will need to be communicated to them. This can be done in several ways, based on the agreements between the trading partners although a GS1 128 case label is that identifies grower, lot number, growing region, and harvest date in human readable form is recommended. 8. What is the definition of indoor grown and how can it be labeled? It is a controlled environment for growing (not Hoop houses). We recommend that indoor growers follow the label standards and be labeled Indoor grown followed by the region and date, i.e. Indoor Grown Romaine: (region) Harvest: (date) 9. When should this be label present for consumers? Immediately and until further notice. This is an interim step until better traceback mechanisms are in place. 10. How should growing regions be named? A workgroup within the 2019 romaine task force suggests that growing regions be communicated on the label using the designations and abbreviations listed below that are based on the boundaries indicated in the accompanying map: If not listed, use the 2-letter state, province or territory abbreviation unless otherwise noted: Growing Region Abbreviation Yuma* Yuma Phoenix Phoenix Southern Arizona South AZ Northern Arizona North AZ Northern California North CA Salinas Salinas Santa Maria Santa Maria Southern California South CA Imperial Valley Imperial Vly Coachella Coachella Central Valley Central Vly Northern Mexico North MX Central Mexico Central MX Southern Mexico South MX Commented [JM1]: The inclusion of valley in the names and abbreviations of several regions is currently under discussion. *note: Yuma includes Bard and Winterhaven, CA. Deliberative Draft 2-28-2019 2

Deliberative Draft 2-28-2019 3 Commented [JM2]: Map will be adjusted so orange (imperial) will be split so bard/winterhaven are part of Yuma

Commented [JM3]: The legend on this map will be adjusted to use the abbreviations Commented [JM4]: We will color a better map 11. Rather than stating harvest can I state packed on? No. Rather than listing two identical dates, when packed on is customarily used and is identical to the harvest date, it s suggested that only the harvest date be used. The change in terminology should be Deliberative Draft 2-28-2019 4

communicated to your customer. If packed on and harvest dates differ, both should be communicated if requested by your customer. 12. Rather than stating harvest (date) can the use by / best before be used to serve the same purpose? No. Because the determination of use by dates vary based on product, company, and customer, the harvest date provides the greatest clarity to consumers. 13. How should the date be expressed/ formatted? At this point in time we recommend the date be communicated as mm/dd/yr. Some companies may elect to label with only mm/dd. Julian date should not be used. Those selling into the Canadian market may need to alter the date format to comply with Canadian labeling regulations. For simplicity in the case of dual labeling, it is important to have year as four digits (2019) if a single label complaint with Canadian standards (Year first) is more practical. 14. What kinds of label materials can be used? FDA has not provided any guidance on this but has indicated for bagged products that will be sold directly to consumers (e.g., at retail), the growing region and harvest date information should be printed directly on the package (e.g., ink jet). Labels can also be printed directly on cartons for salads or field-packed product or they may be printed on stickers and placed on cartons. Remember, the stickers or printed labels on cartons must be easily found by the receiver as they will need to be able to communicate with consumers directly. 15. For dual jurisdiction facilities, will this require a label review by USDA FSIS? At our urging, FSIS posted an ask FSIS Q&A that states FSIS will permit a statement identifying the harvest location and date, consistent with FDA s advice, on meat or poultry products that contain romaine lettuce. FSIS will also permit statements identifying that a meat or poultry product does not contain romaine lettuce, e.g., adding a sticker to a label that states, "Does Not Contain Romaine Lettuce." The addition of these statements to labels does not require submitting the labels to FSIS for sketch or temporary approval. Both types of statements are not considered special claims and are generically approved under Title 9 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 412.2. 16. What fonts and print sizes, color can be used? The information should be prominent, conspicuous and easy to read. While color is not specified, information is most easily read when there is visual contrast (e.g., contrast the contents or packaging graphics), upper and lower-case letters (not all upper case), and a font size no smaller than 6-point font. 17. Where should the label be located on the package or box? The information should be prominently displayed on the front of package; be aware of proper customer readability with the proper ink color relative to product background. 18. Must the harvest date and growing region be printed on the PTI label? No, this information can be provided on a separate label but we advise applying a GS1 128 case label to each carton. 19. If a supplier chooses to include growing region and harvest date information on the PTI label, is there any guidance? We suggest that this information be printed using any open space on the PTI label, with a font size consistent with other human readable information. Where pack date is already listed, this can be expressed as harvest date as applicable. The objective of Deliberative Draft 2-28-2019 5

providing the growing region and harvest date on the PTI label is to ensure the information is communicated clearly through the supply chain to retailers, foodservice operations, institutions, etc. An example is provided below as reference, but firms have the flexibility to convey information in the manner they feel is most appropriate. 20. Under what circumstances is an in-store point of sale sign needed for bulk, unpackaged romaine, and what should it say? Because retail and foodservice establishments promptly act on advisories, product under advisory should not be available for sale. Therefore, information on harvest date and provenance do not need to be displayed by retailers on an ongoing basis, When there is an advisory, retailers should have a sign indicating that bulk, unpackaged romaine for sale is not implicated. 21. If products are transformed in-store and don t bear a label what is suggested? CDC advised that restaurants and retailers should check the label on bags or boxes of romaine lettuce, or ask their suppliers about the source of their romaine lettuce. Retailers transforming product instore (e.g., prepared foods) should ensure that the romaine used meets these criteria, and should be prepared to address consumer questions. 22. Will restaurants need to provide growing region and harvest date information to consumers? Foodservice operations may field consumer questions as well as adhere to potential removal advisories. Foodservice products should include regional information and harvest dates on the end unit or box. 23. What if I ship to Canada? CFIA is not requiring any unique information for romaine at this time. If you have any questions, please contact the CFIA National Import Service Centre (NISC) from 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) at 1-800-835-4486 (Canada or USA). 24. Must all points in the supply chain capture growing region and harvest date information as part of their traceability information? The label/ sticker information is in addition to traceability information that should be captured electronically. The Key Data Elements of a robust traceability system would provide more detailed information that what is provided through this initiative. 25. Should the harvest date and harvest region be printed on the Bill of Lading? In the event of a traceback situation, this information could be useful in more quickly identifying and excluding shipments and regions that may or may not be involved in an outbreak. However, this should not be in lieu of more granular traceability information. Example labels will be included in future drafts Deliberative Draft 2-28-2019 6