6th meeting, 12 April 2018, Brussels JOINT DECLARATION

Similar documents
Conference of Speakers of the European Union Parliaments

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2311(INI) on the 2016 Commission Report on Serbia (2016/2311(INI))

Plenary Meeting of the LX COSAC November 2018, Vienna Contribution of the LX COSAC

PLENARY MEETING OF THE LIX COSAC June 2018, Sofia

Conclusions of the Conference on donor coordination Tirana, April 2/3 2009

NEGOTIATING FRAMEWORK. (Luxembourg, 3 October 2005) Principles governing the negotiations

3rd ACP EU Youth Conference St. Julian, MALTA 18th June 2017

EPSU POLICY PAPER LIFELONG LEARNING FOR ALL

Spanish Presidency of the European Union

The involvement of the social partners and organised civil society in the Europe 2020 strategy

TOWARDS A EUROPEAN ALLIANCE FOR UPWARD WAGE CONVERGENCE. Sofia 26 June 2018

PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN INITIATIVE Bucharest, October 2009 FINAL DECLARATION

The Future of the Berlin Process

PUBLIC LIMITE EN CONFERENCEONACCESSION TOTHEEUROPEANUNION SERBIA. Brusels,9January2014 AD1/14 LIMITE CONF-RS1

An Opinion from. the EFTA Consultative Committee. The Amsterdam Treaty

Peer Review Report. Peer Review on Corporate Social Responsibility Stockholm (Sweden), 25 September 2013

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/2148(INI)

NEGOTIATING FRAMEWORK. Principles governing the negotiations

RESOLUTION. of the Conference of the Belarusian National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum

8954/18 YML/ik 1 DG C 1B

Plan The Government has established an efficient mechanism for implementation of the measures of the Plan 3-6-9:

EFTA CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE

An Opinion of the EFTA Consultative Committee INTERNAL MARKET STRATEGY PRIORITIES And the follow-up on the EFTA side

European Parliament resolution on the mid-term review of the Lisbon Strategy. having regard to Rule 103 of its Rules of Procedure,

The European vision to support Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and Local Authorities (LAs) in partner countries

9647/17 AS/mk 1 DG B 1C

COMMISSION DECISION. of

Staffing the departments for Voters List and IT in the SEC in order to increase the efficiency of the Commission

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

COVER NOTE General Secretariat Working Party on Enlargement and Countries Negotiating Accession to the EU

ACP-EU JOINT PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY

A GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 19 March /12 CO EUR-PREP 12 POLGEN 48 NOTE

COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN MUNICIPALITIES AND REGIONS CONSEIL DES COMMUNES ET REGIONS D EUROPE

WORK PROGRAMME OF THE COR'S TASK FORCE ON UKRAINE FOR

OUTCOME OF THE COUNCIL MEETING. 3374th Council meeting. Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs. Brussels, 9 March 2015

10319/18 YML/ik 1 DG C 1B

6280/18 CFP/agi 1 DGC 2A

8833/16 YML/ik 1 DG C 1

The EU and the Swedish collective agreement model

European Economic and Social Committee

REVES Position Paper. European Cohesion Policy and related legislative proposals

G8 Labour and Employment Ministers Conference. Shaping the Social Dimension of Globalisation. Dresden, 6 to 8 May Chair's Conclusions

G8 Labour and Employment Ministers Conference. Shaping the Social Dimension of Globalisation. Dresden, 6 to 8 May Chair's Conclusions

The future of the Cotonou agreement Role of civil society in the future ACP-EU partnership

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION. on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States

DOCUMENT OF THE EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT

Action Plan for Strengthening Legislative and Oversight Role. of the Parliament of Montenegro in 2015

Post-monitoring dialogue with Monaco

Official Journal C 271 A. of the European Union. Information and Notices. Announcements. Volume 60. English edition. 17 August 2017.

14839/16 YML/sv 1 DGC 1

EEA Consultative Committee

CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE RESOLUTION AND REPORT. the Social Dimension of the EEA and the European Pillar of Social Rights.

Civil Society Facility (8) Country Fiche: Serbia. 1.2 Title: Civil Society Facility Serbia Programme

European Parliament resolution of 8 March 2011 on the revision of the General Product Safety Directive and market surveillance (2010/2085(INI))

LIMITE EN. Brussels, 15 November EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA Council of the EEA EEE 1607/2/11 REV 2

THEMATIC COMPILATION OF RELEVANT INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY GREECE ARTICLE 10 UNCAC PUBLIC REPORTING

DRAFT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

Council conclusions on The EU's External Aviation Policy - Addressing Future Challenges

10370/17 YML/ik 1 DG C 1

Objectives of the SWD Taking stock of the main achievements of EU sectoral social dialogue and its related committees Identifying possible improvement

12th Meeting of European Ministers responsible for Public Administration, Mondorf-les-Bains, 8 June 2005 RESOLUTIONS

ACCRA AGENDA FOR ACTION

epp european people s party

Subject: Action Plan to follow-up on the Decision on the International Criminal Court

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

ILC98-Partial En.doc RECOVERING FROM THE CRISIS: A GLOBAL JOBS PACT

The Accra Agenda for Action From a Democracy, Human Rights and Gender Equality Perspective:

4. EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

address the concept of decent work and inadequate investment in education and training.

Work Programme Funding priorities for European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI)

Climate Alliance views on the Roadmap for the Global Climate Action Agenda

Czech Republic ILO COOPERATION RESULTS OVERVIEW

Danube Strategy and Civil Society Participation Establishing a structure for Civil Society Dialogue in the Danube Basin

Memorandum of Understanding on the development of the South East Europe Core Regional Transport Network

The problem of European governance and accountability. QCEA QPSW conference Brussels, 16 November 2013 Rebecca Gumbrell-McCormick

NATIONAL SETTLEMENT SERVICES OUTCOMES STANDARDS. Settlement Council of Australia

Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean

EEA CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 6 May /1/11 REV 1 SPORT 16

HELSINKI EUROPEAN COUNCIL : PRESIDENCY CONCLUSIONS / Council-Documents mentioned in Annex VI to be found under Press Release Library / Miscellaneous

EUROPE 2020 A European strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth

MINISTERIAL MEETING URBAN POLICY CITIES EMPOWER EUROPE CONCEPT CONCLUSIONS DUTCH PRESIDENCY 2004

Relationships with Government

REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Negotiating Group for the Chapter 5-Public procurement. Bilateral screening: Chapter 5 PRESENTATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on Regional Development. on cohesion policy and marginalised communities (2014/2247(INI))

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

DECISION No. 19/06 STRENGTHENING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OSCE

Plenary Meeting of the LX COSAC November 2018, Vienna Contribution of the LX COSAC

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Governing Body 319th Session, Geneva, October 2013

European Parliament Resolution. September 28, 2005

EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT. Programme for Supporting Renewable Energy in Ukraine

IMPROVING THE BUSINESS CLIMATE THROUGH INVESTMENT COUNCILS

Address by Mr Gianni Buquicchio. President of the Venice Commission. presenting its Annual Report of Activities for 2015

Strategy of the Armenian Association of Social Workers (AASW)

Dr. Franz Schausberger Present Status on Serbia s way to Europe

Transcription:

6th meeting, 12 April 2018, Brussels JOINT DECLARATION The EU-Serbia Civil Society Joint Consultative Committee (JCC) is one of the bodies set up within the framework of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and Serbia. The JCC enables civil society organisations (CSOs) from both sides to monitor Serbia's progress towards the European Union, and to adopt recommendations for the attention of the Government of Serbia and the EU institutions. The JCC understands the notion of civil society as encompassing organisations of employers, trade unions and other economic, social and civic interests. The JCC is made up of eighteen members, nine from each side, representing the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) and Serbian civil society. During its current term, the JCC is co-chaired by Ionuţ Sibian, member of the EESC and Executive Director of the Civil Society Development Foundation of Romania, and Zoran Stojiljković, President of the Trade Union Confederation "Nezavisnost". The members of the JCC discussed the state of play and the work ahead in Serbia's accession negotiations to the EU. They assessed the extent to which EU standards had been adopted in the areas of the social economy and social enterprises in Serbia and held a discussion on the involvement of the social partners and other civil society organisations in the preparation of the Economic Reform Programme (ERP) and the Employment and Social Policy Reform Programme (ESRP). 1. State of play of EU-Serbia relations and the accession process 1.1 The JCC members are pleased that since the last meeting, Serbia has opened Chapter 6 (Company law) and Chapter 30 (External relations). This brings the number of chapters open to twelve, of which two have already been provisionally closed. The members of the JCC again called on the Serbian authorities and the EU to keep up the pace of meetings and the evaluation of all interim benchmarks, especially those on the rule of law Chapters 23 and 24 which are essential for ensuring progress on the EU accession negotiations. They also reiterate the need to continue to involve civil society representatives, including the social partners, in a meaningful way in all the relevant chapters and at all stages of the accession negotiations. 1.2 The EESC welcomes the EU-Western Balkans heads of states and governments summit to be held on 17 May in Sofia. The EESC hopes that the summit in Sofia will confirm the renewed EN

momentum for the EU s commitment to the region and encourage other future presidencies to keep the integration of the Western Balkan countries high on their priorities. 1.3 The JCC welcomes the Commission's new strategy for the Western Balkans entitled "A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans" which was published on 6 February 2018, and its six flagship initiatives. 1.4 The JCC expresses its readiness to contribute to the implementation of the actions stipulated in the Action Plan in Support of the Transformation of the Western Balkans for 2018-2020, particularly in the areas of the rule of law, security and migration, socio-economic development, connectivity, the digital agenda and reconciliation and good neighbourly relations. 1.5 The JCC is pleased that Serbia is recognised as one of the two frontrunner candidates in the Western Balkan region and invites the Serbian authorities, as well as the EU institutions, to make every effort to keep the prospect of Serbia's EU accession by 2025 feasible. 1.6 The JCC encourages the Serbian authorities to work ceaselessly to ensure respect for the rule of law, fundamental rights, judicial reform, the fight against corruption and the autonomy of journalists and freedom of the press. Once again, it reminds the Serbian authorities of the importance of ensuring an enabling civic space for a strong and effective social and civil dialogue. The JCC stresses that civil society organisations (CSOs), as well as independent regulatory bodies, are an important partner for the government and play an essential democratic role. Their participation in working groups on drafting laws, strategies and action plans should be ensured, with the obligation to report on the results of the consultation processes. 2. The social economy and social enterprises 2.1 The JCC invites the Serbian government to establish at national level a working group for social entrepreneurship that would bring together all relevant stakeholders in a constructive dialogue. This working group would establish a broad framework for the development of social entrepreneurship, formulate a social entrepreneurship development strategy in Serbia, and monitor the quality and level of training of social entrepreneurs. At local level, the JCC believes that regional support centres for social entrepreneurship should be established to provide support for local authorities in recognising the role of social enterprises. Those centres should also help social enterprises with capacity-building measures and with establishing partnerships with the public and private sectors. 2.2 The JCC invites the Serbian authorities to adopt the Law on the Social Economy as a matter of priority, since it has been proven that the social economy and social enterprises contribute significantly to addressing challenges such as including the most disadvantaged and vulnerable groups in both society and the labour market. It stresses that a balance should be struck between the legislative objective of giving visibility to this sector and supporting its development, and the danger of neglecting some other forms of social enterprises which are not recognised as such, but which nonetheless deliver services of general interest.

2.3 The JCC stresses that existing Serbian legislation (such as the Law on Professional Rehabilitation and Employment of Persons with Disabilities, Law on Associations, Company Law and Law on Cooperatives) needs to be amended in order to harmonise the definition of social entrepreneurship already mentioned in some legislation and to make social entrepreneurship sustainable. 2.4 In order to achieve the economic sustainability of social enterprises, the members of the JCC call upon the Serbian authorities at central and local level to: - concentrate on securing resources to finance projects (by means of the Centre for Social Entrepreneurship within regional agencies); - develop a more open approach to financing using the local budget (financing operational expenses); - further develop possibilities for micro-credit (the Sustainable Development and Poverty Reduction Fund deployed in under-developed parts of Serbia can be used as a model, and the Fund could finance social entrepreneurship in areas within its remit); - develop effective mechanisms to prevent risks of corruption in allocating public funds; - provide social enterprises with funding from the local authorities to cover the cost of training in business skills; this could be done through the voucher system so that social enterprises may freely choose the programmes and services which best suit them; - achieve complete territorial coverage of the country with support services for training and educating social entrepreneurs through networking and cooperation between institutions, primarily at local level; - continuously improve the abilities, skills and knowledge of employees in central and local institutions in the area of social entrepreneurship; - raise the awareness and visibility of support services for training and educating social enterprises and potential social entrepreneurs through promotional campaigns organised by the Social Entrepreneurship Development Centre; - adopt support measures to the types of enterprises envisaged and boost support, both financial and by opening access to the socially and environmentally responsible public procurement. 2.5 The members of the JCC emphasise that the approach towards the recognition of the social economy and social enterprises should be chosen following a careful assessment of the impact of various measures on the sector in the EU Member States. They stress that relevant experience in EU Member States should be assessed and used to build trust in the sector and increase understanding of the evolving concepts of the social economy and social enterprises. 2.6 The JCC invites the European Commission to further facilitate learning and development by means of the exchange of best practice at regional level. Building the capacity of relevant stakeholders, facilitating access to the market and finance and providing business advisory services should be given priority. 2.7 The JCC believes that the EESC's Category on the Social Economy could facilitate the exchange of best practice, access to information and involvement in policy formulation for national and regional stakeholders.

3. The involvement of the social partners and other civil society organisations in the preparation of Economic Reform Programmes 3.1 The JCC welcomes the establishment of the Platform for Monitoring the Implementation of the Economic Reform Programme (ERP) and the Employment and Social Reform Programme (ESRP), incorporated in the National Convention on the EU (NCEU), as a new form of structured dialogue between the Serbian Government and CSOs. It reminds the Serbian authorities that the European Commission's Guidance for the Economic Reform Programmes notes that the involvement of the social partners and other civil society organisations in reporting on programme implementation is crucial to creating ownership and the widest possible political support. 3.2 The JCC believes that it is of the utmost importance to ensure the sustainability of structures and the monitoring mechanism of the ERP and the ESRP, at the level of both the government and civil society. It emphasises that the knowledge and experience obtained during the first phase of structured monitoring of the ERP and the ESRP by civil society should be kept up and developed. 3.3 The JCC stresses the important role that the Economic and Social Council of the Republic of Serbia has to play in shaping and monitoring the ERP and the ESRP, and invites the Serbian authorities to regularly involve and consult the Economic and Social Council in the process of adopting these important documents and all the reforms stemming from them. 3.4 The JCC calls upon the Serbian authorities to include the European Pillar of Social Rights in the next cycle of the ERP in Serbia. It invites the Serbian authorities, in cooperation with the social partners and other CSOs, to perform social impact assessments of all structural reforms, and to link these assessments to the priorities determined during the ESRP. Further monitoring and revision of the ESRP and its instruments, in line with the Social Pillar and its social scoreboard, would be necessary. 3.5 When designing employment and social inclusion measures, the JCC invites the Serbian authorities to make use of the Employment Guidelines proposed by the European Commission that align the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights with the commitment to enhance the EU s competitiveness through investment, job creation and social cohesion. The JCC strongly believes that the creation of sustainable and good quality jobs must be identified as one of the objectives of the ERP and that structural reforms must be designed to achieve this goal. 3.6 The JCC calls on the Serbian authorities to involve all the relevant stakeholders, including the Serbian National Assembly and local authorities, in a more effective and efficient way when developing and implementing public policies and programming documents such as the ERP and the ESRP. 3.7 The JCC instructs its co-chairs to forward this joint declaration to the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Council, the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee (SAPC), the European External Action Service (EEAS), the European Commission and the Government of Serbia.

* * * The next JCC meeting, to be held in Serbia in the second half of 2018, will deal with the subjects of equal opportunities and reducing inequalities in the Serbian society, as well as enabling civic space.