i-admin /15/14 2 of 3 Doc Type: Board Memo/Issue Statement

Similar documents
Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. For More Information


The IAQ/Mold Assessment Getting it Right! Controlling Your Risk

Case Study of TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air and the Effects of Ventilation on Entry Routes

Vapor Intrusion Pathway Feasibility Study

BLASER VAPOR INTRUSION INSPECTION, MONITORING, AND MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

THE STATUS OF VAPOR INTRUSION ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION IN OREGON

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex

March 2010 Frequently Asked Questions

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Methods & Strategies

FACTS ABOUT: Vapor Intrusion

Presented by: Thomas Hatton

Practical Aspects of VI Assessment for TCE. Acknowledgments and special thanks to:

SOIL VAPOR INTRUSION Frequently Asked Questions

Case Study of Modeled and Observed TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air. Christopher G. Lawless Johnson Wright, Inc.

New Insights Into Exposure Through Preferential Pathway Vapor Migration

Kansas Drycleaning Program. kdheks.gov

Proposed MCP Amendments

PM STRAUSS & ASSOCIATES Energy and Environmental Consulting MEMORANDUM

Receive Site Fact Sheets by . See "For More Information" to Learn How.

Southeast Hennepin Groundwater and Vapor Intrusion Site

Vapor Intrusion in Massachusetts Gerard Martin

Residential Vapor Intrusion due to a Neighborhood Dry Cleaner

March 16, Dear Mr. Chapman:

General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Five-Year Review. Table of Contents

What is Vapor Intrusion and How is it Investigated? MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Vapor Intrusion Pathway Investigation Report

Risk and Required Mitigation

EPA Vapor Intrusion Update

Receive Site Fact Sheets by . See "For More Information" to Learn How.

MEMO. Kris Hinskey

SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR TIER 3 AIR QUALITY MONITORING 218-1/2 South Findlay Street, Seattle (Location 10)

Case Studies of Innovative Use of Tracers, Indicators and Field GC/MS for Assessing the Vapor Intrusion Pathway

Design of Below Sub-slab Vapour Management System for a Commercial Building

MPCA Site Assessment: Vapor Intrusion Investigation. Remediation Division Superfund Unit 1

TRANSPORT PATHWAY EVIDENCE OF A SEWER VAPOR. Findings from Work Performed at the Indianapolis USEPA Research Duplex

RISK BULLETIN. Vapor Intrusion An Emerging Environmental Liability WHAT IS VAPOR INTRUSION?

A Rational Approach to Vapor Intrusion Preferential Pathways

DUPONT VAPOR MITIGATION PROGRAM

Dayton Bar Association

Mass Flux Characterization for Vapor Intrusion Assessment

Attenuation of Hydrocarbon Vapors from LNAPL Under Residential and Commercial/Industrial Buildings

Layering Institutional Controls Region 9 Example. Alana Lee EPA Region 9

PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance

REGULATORY-DIRECTED COMBINED REMEDY APPROACH FOR CHLORINATED VAPOR INTRUSION/MITIGATION AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION UNDER A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD

7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES

Five Vapor Intrusion Sites in New York State Lenny Siegel August, 2007

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Receive Site Fact Sheets by . See "For More Information" to Learn How.

Armen Cleaners Indoor Air Quality Investigation. Jon Gulch, OSC U.S. EPA, Region V, ERB

Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings

TCE Havertown Site Vapor Intrusion Assessment

Soil Vapor Migration Through Subsurface Utilities

SOUTHWEST DIVISION Comparing Air Measurements and Modeling Results at a Residential Site Overlying a TCE Plume October 18, 2004

Expediting Vapor Intrusion Assessments Using High Resolution Continuous Monitoring

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FINAL INDOOR AIR QUALITY REPORT #8 FORMER RARITAN ARSENAL EDISON, NEW JERSEY

SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION

CLEANUP ACTION PLAN COOK INLET HOUSING AUTHORITY 3607 & 3609 SPENARD ROAD ANCHORAGE, ALASKA OCTOBER 7, Prepared By:

MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY REMEDY DECISION DOCUMENT. Washington County Landfill Lake Elmo, Minnesota

Conceptual Site Model for Mercury Impacted Soil and Groundwater as a Tool for Effective Remediation

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation: Answering the Common Questions Plaguing Brownfield Developers West Virginia Brownfields Conference

Resolving Vapor Intrusion Challenges via Automated Continuous Real-Time Monitoring and Response

Two Connecticut Vapor Intrusion Sites Lenny Siegel Center for Public Environmental Oversight June, 2007

Fast-Track Vapor Intrusion Assessments Using HAPSITE Portable GC-MS

Vapor Intrusion Panel Discussion. SCRD Fall 2009 Meeting Terry Evanson Wisconsin DNR,

An RT Regulatory Program Summary

Document Separator DSO00. Document ID Number

Risk Management Strategies to Address Vapor Intrusion Assessment and Mitigation Uncertainties Robert Ettinger Geosyntec Consultants

Testing Is Easy And Inexpensive

Receive Site Fact Sheets by . See "For More Information" to Learn How. PUBLIC MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT:

Redfield Site. Environmental Fact Sheet September 2006

LSPA Comments: MassDEP 2014 Public Review Draft, Vapor Intrusion Guidance

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Hoovering the Hoover District, North Canton, Ohio by Lenny Siegel May, 2017

New Data on Attenuation Coefficients for Crawl Spaces and Deep Soil Gas from the Lowry AFB Site, Denver, Colorado

VI Investigations in North Carolina What We ve Learned. Delonda Alexander NC Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act Program

FACTS ABOUT: Kop-Flex. Site Location. Site History. Environmental Investigations

INDOOR AIR QUALITY REPORT #7

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT

DECISION DOCUMENT. Kent Avenue Station Site Voluntary Cleanup Program Brooklyn, Kings County Site No. V00732 October 2013

Vapor-Intrusion Management Plan Lockheed Martin Middle River Complex 2323 Eastern Boulevard Middle River, Maryland

Diagnosing Vapor Intrusion Occurrence, Impact, and Contributing Pathways

Former Raritan Arsenal Fact Sheet

MEMORANDUM. To: Billy Meyer. Christie Zawtocki, PE Kitty Hiortdahl, EI. Date: March 12, 2015

Update - Vapor Intrusion and Mitigation in Florida

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

EPA Seeks Public Comments on Proposed Plan to Amend 1991 Cleanup Plan. vapor intrusion, and identifies and provides the rationale for EPA s

February 25, Mr. Wayne Loflin, Maintenance Director Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools PO Box 2513 Winston-Salem, NC

Vapor Intrusion Update: Separating the Environmental exposure from Indoor Air Quality Issues Guidance

Indoor Air Study Data Summary and Analysis Report Main TCE Plume, OU5 Former Lowry Air Force Base Denver, Colorado

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Mgmt. Office of Waste Management. NEWMOA TCE Vapor Intrusion Workshop Providence, Rhode Island April 13, 2015

Understanding Building Materials Contribution to Indoor Air Quality

Sustainability; in Residential, Commercial and Industrial Buildings

Background. NCP Early or Interim Actions 5/3/2017. Current Ohio EPA Response Action Levels and Time Frames for TCE at Vapor Intrusion Sites in Ohio

An Integrated Model for Design of Soil Vapour Intrusion Mitigation Systems

Intensive Study of VOCs and Radon in a Historical Duplex A First Look

Risk-Based Clean-Up in Georgia Under the VRP Vapor Intrusion

Vapor Intrusion Basics

Use of Crawl Space Sampling Data and Other Lines of Evidence for Evaluating Vapor Intrusion

Transcription:

On September 13, 2010, with MPCA approval GMI discontinued the groundwater extraction and treatment because TCE concentrations had decreased below the cleanup concentrations established in the Consent Order. After the pump and treat system was shut down, MPCA required General Mills to begin quarterly groundwater monitoring to determine if the groundwater contamination would increase in concentration without the system operating. Vapor Intrusion VI) Investigation Across South East Como Neighborhood 2012 2013) More recently, professional experience, both of MPCA staff and others around the country working on contaminated properties, shows that even relatively low VOC concentrations in groundwater can contaminate the air contained in the soil. The air in the void spaces in the soil is called soil gas. The soil gas has the potential to make its way into homes and buildings through utility openings and cracks in the basement floor or walls and create an indoor air contamination exposure risk. The risk of soil gas migrating into homes is referred to as the vapor intrusion potential or VI potential. The VI potential from the contaminated groundwater plume prompted MPCA to request that GMI conduct a soil gas survey in the vicinity of the General Mills Site and adjoining VOC groundwater plume. Beginning in April 2012, soil gas sampling was conducted in three phases in the public rights of way in the South East Como Neighborhood. Soil gas samples were collected from borings at a depth of about eight feet below grade the approximate depths of area basements). In early October 2013, 14 of 40 soil gas samples confirmed the presence of TCE in soil gas above risk criteria established by the MPCA. Soil gas data were compared with the known groundwater plume footprint. Data analysis of the groundwater plume and the newer soil gas plume, led to the public notice of the VI potential. See Figure 1: The Vapor Intrusion Pathway) Public Involvement November 2013 to present) The soil gas survey data mapped an area containing 195 parcels with a VI potential risk the Vapor Study Area, shown by the orange outline on the attached map). On November 6, 2013, the MPCA mailed 950 letters to tenants, residents and property owners. The joint Minnesota Department of Health MDH) MPCA letter communicated new information that the groundwater contaminant plume in the area poses vapor intrusion risks, requested assistance and cooperation of residents and property owners, and announced two public meetings scheduled for November 12, 2013. Following the public meetings, MPCA staff along with MDH and GMI) attended more than five community group meetings as well as office hours sessions where tenants, residents and property owners could meet with MPCA, MDH, GMI and its primary environmental consultant, Barr Engineering. Since early November 2013, the groundwater contamination and VI story remains widely covered by the local media and is frequently discussed in public meetings. Sub slab Soil Gas Sampling Throughout the Vapor Study Area November 18, 2013, to present) MPCA requested that property owners within the Vapor Study Area, and properties adjacent to properties which have been tested to show a VI potential risk, enter into an access agreement with GMI to allow sub slab soil gas sampling of their homes/buildings. To determine if contamination in soil gas is entering a building creating an indoor air exposure, a sub slab sample an air sample collected from beneath the basement floor) is collected. A GMI environmental consultant installs a sampling ports) through the foundation floor to obtain a representative soil gas samples). The concentration of TCE in the sample is evaluated against a MPCA established criteria for soil gas beneath buildings. The risk based criterion for sub slab soil gas is 10 times the concentration established by MDH as safe for the air inside the building i.e., residential or commercial/industrial value). For example, the MDH indoor air standard for TCE in residential use application is 2 µg/m³. Residential buildings with sub slab TCE concentrations greater than 20 µg/m³ receive a vapor mitigation system after the building owner signs a Mitigation Installation Agreement. If initial TCE concentrations in the sub slab air of residential buildings are between 2 and 20 µg/mᶟ, a second sampling event is scheduled to confirm TCE concentrations are below 20 µg/m³, the cut off for mitigation. GMI s work is being conducted under the oversight of the MPCA. This oversight includes MPCA conducting field duplicate sampling and laboratory analyses, as well as field audits by MPCA staff and an MPCA consultant. i-admin17-04 1/15/14 2 of 3 Doc Type: Board Memo/Issue Statement

Sub slab Vapor Mitigation Installations November 28, 2013, to present) The sub slab vapor mitigation system is the same as a typical radon mitigation system. Such systems consist of a hole in the building floor, with a sealed pipe attached that leads to a low wattage, in line turbine or fan placed outside of the living space i.e., in the attic or outdoors). The fan pulls soil gas from beneath the foundation and discharges it to ambient air through a stack above the roofline and away from any building intakes. Full foundation sub slab depressurization is assured though field diagnostic testing and the mitigation system design. Installations are tailored to each building. The end result is an operational depressurization system that eliminates the vapor intrusion pathway. See Figure 2: The In Home Vapor Mitigation System) Additional Remedial Actions for Contaminant Cleanup 2014 2015) After properties that need mitigation are identified and the mitigation systems are installed, General Mills, under MPCA oversight, will do additional investigation and cleanup of the contamination. This work is needed to address the contamination in the soil gas that extends from the contaminated groundwater. Attachments Attachment 1: General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Study Area Sampling Status Map Attachment 2: Figure 1: The Vapor Intrusion Pathway Attachment 3: Figure 2: The In Home Vapor Mitigation System i-admin17-04 1/15/14 3 of 3 Doc Type: Board Memo/Issue Statement

ATTACHMENT 1 General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Study Area Sampling Status E Hennepin Ave k j General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site historic disposal area Vapor Study Area Approximate Groundwater TCE Plume Sub-slab Vapor Sampling Status No mitigation required No mitigation required Will Receive a second sampling event Mitigation needed Results less than 2 ug/m3 in first event or less than 20 ug/m3 in second event* Commercial/Industrial results less than 60 ug/m3 Results 2-20 ug/m3* in first event sample Results greater than 20 ug/m3* Ventilation system installed* First sample was 2-20 ug/m3 Second sample completed *Sampling status current as of Feb. 5, 2014, 4PM. Wright Anoka Washington k j denied 23rd Ave SE Sampling access agreement denied* Sampling access agreement signed signed but not scheduled* scheduled Sampling event scheduled* complete Results not yet available* Hennepin Ramsey 7th St SE Meters 0 Feet 0 100 200 400 1:6,000 200 600 Map Vicinity Carver Scott Dakota

Figure 1: The Vapor Intrusion Pathway ATTACHMENT 2

ATTACHMENT 3 FIGURE 2: The In Home Vapor Mitigation System In-home vapor mitigation systems