Stream Buffers Sharpest Tool in the SWM Toolbox Tom Hegemier, PE, D.WRE, CFM

Similar documents
Riparian Setback- What is that and what should I be doing? October 25th, 2016 Presented by: Anil Tangirala, PE, CFM, ENV SP

CITY OF AUSTIN'S REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR CREEK PROTECTION

ANCR INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES SUMMARY: 2/11/04 WATER RESOURCES GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Highland Lakes Watershed Ordinance Regulations Handbook

Water Quality Stewardship Plan (WaQSP)

Drainage Criteria Manual Review

INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Support legislation that will protect the quantity of water in Lake Erie

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

Municipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates VNH File No.

City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Annual Public Meeting. June 11, 2018

Watershed Protection Mission and Goals for 2015

I. Welcome & Introductions WPAC History (Paul Racette, PEC)

Effectiveness of Non-Structural Measures in Watershed Restoration

iswm TM Criteria Manual City of Azle Section 14 City of Azle Subdivision Ordinance DRAFT-June Chapter 1

Grand Traverse Bay Watershed Protection Plan:

GETTING STARTED: LEVERAGING FUNDING SOURCES TO CREATE OPPORTUNITIES KAMM CONFERENCE August 24, 2016 Presented By: Sarah Taylor

Water Quality Ecosystem Services in the Urban Environment

Watershed Improvements

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

Position paper and recommendations for Improving Stormwater Management in San Antonio

SECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION

Quantifying the Benefits of Stream Restoration

Appendix B Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist

Surface Water. Solutions for a better world

SHORELINE INVENTORY AND RESTORATION PLANNING

SECTION 3 NATURAL RESOURCES

Model Riparian Buffer Ordinance.

Integrated Watershed Restoration in Urban Areas

Scoping Study for Upper Petaluma River Watershed Flood Control Project. Frequently Asked Questions

Grand Traverse Bay Watershed Protection Plan:

Phase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)

CHAPTER 10 CRITICAL DRAINAGE AREAS

STREAM AND BUFFER AREA PROTECTION/RESTORATION

City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) January 23, 2017

WATER QUALITY WORKSHOP

Notice of Preparation for the Copeland Creek Stormwater Detention Basin (CIP Project )

Creating a Sustainable Future at Penn State

Sustainable Water Resource Practices

TORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

3D WETLAND MANAGEMENT

Case Study No. 3: Waterfront Drive,

FEMA s Mitigation Support for Resiliency: Innovative Drought and Flood Mitigation Projects

PWD s Systematic Watershed-wide Approach to Stormwater Mgmt.

CLEARWATER TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

SCRCA SECTION 28 WETLAND POLICY

Storm Water Resource Plan Criteria and Metrics Checklist

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

Community Services and Utilities & Environmental Protection Report to UE The SPC on Utilities and Environment Page 1 of April 25

RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL CITY CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Incorporating Restoration Planning and Transportation Controls into the Valley Creek Watershed Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan

Georgia s Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria The Old, the New, and the Misunderstood

Comprehensive Plan Update - Stormwater Management Section Planning Commission Workshop: November 10, 2014

Riparian Buffer Requirements. Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management

4. Present Activities and Roles

Design Example Residential Subdivision

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW Mississippi Dr Coon Rapids, MN SQ FT Residence on 0.64 Acre Lot

C Fish Lake C Rice Lake C Mud Lake C Weaver Lake C Elm Creek*

Maintaining Riparian Areas and Wetlands

SILVER SPRINGS/RIVER POLLUTION REDUCTION PROJECT IMPROVING THE WATER QUALITY OF THE SILVER SPRINGS ECOSYSTEM

CRS Activity 450: Stormwater Management

Appendix A Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form

VILLAGE OF BELLAIRE WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

PENN STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES FOR LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY AT THE UNIVERSITY PARK CAMPUS

Lake Creek Watershed Management Plan Public Meeting. Arrowhead Lake May 3, :00 PM

COTTONWOOD CREEK RECLAMATION PHASE I & II

ELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Maitland Valley WATERSHED

CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS Stormwater Management Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 6, 2012

BANKS TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

DRAINAGE AND NATURAL AQUIFER GROUNDWATER RECHARGE ELEMENT

The Lower Watershed Ecosystem Services in Coastal Areas with a focus on the Courtenay River Floodplain

Hydromodification Management Measures

Hydromodification Management Measures

Boardman River Townships Project EAST BAY TOWNSHIP. WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN Fall 2009

Yuba County IRWMP 2015 UPDATE APPENDIX 10-1 General Plan Relation to IRWMP

Local Stormwater Design Manual. City of Fairburn

Conservation, Open Space & Groundwater Recharge Element

2013 Water and Watershed Conference Plymouth State University March 22, Chris Skoglund

STORM WATER and LID SESSION

Presentation Overview

May 20, Buffer Program in Flux: Past, Present and Future

October 2015 Utilizing a County-Owned Golf Course for Watershed Restoration in Gwinnett County, GA

California s New Construction General Permit

Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

Appendix J. Existing Efforts for Identifying Multi-Benefit Projects

PEACE RIVER MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY Orange Hammock Ranch Conservation Fact Sheet

Updates on EPA Stormwater Program

Section 3: Stormwater Problems

Practices that capture and temporarily store the WQ v before allowing it to infiltrate into the soil.

Capital Facilities Element

CHATHAM PARK EXCEPTIONAL DESIGN EVALUATION

Stormwater Capture and Recharge to Enhance Riparian Habitat

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. KTJ 314, LLC Blaine, MN 55449

iswm TM Criteria Manual City Date here

Council of Governments

Water Resource Protection. Today s Presentation

Transcription:

Stream Buffers Sharpest Tool in the SWM Toolbox 1 Tom Hegemier, PE, D.WRE, CFM www.apaienv.com

Stream Buffers - Overview 2 Why stream buffers? Floodplain management and other benefits Existing regulatory approaches Comparison with standard SWMM Storm drain outfall/creek protection Stormwater program approach

Importance of Headwater Streams 3 Headwater streams 80% of stream network Rivers originate from headwater streams Primary source of our nation s waters Generate local recharge Mitigate flooding Filter stormwater Habitat

Consequences of Headwater Stream Loss Increase runoff rate and volume Stream widening and down-cutting Damage roads, bridges, utilities, buildings, property Extensive habitat and floodplain storage loss Increased sediment volume Impair quality, habitat, lakes Increase treatment costs Reduced water supplies 4

Stream Buffer Standards 5 Buffer width based on drainage area or the floodplain No development, construction, alterations Allow utility crossings perpendicular to stream Allow low impact development parks, trails Minimize the number of road crossings

Stream Buffer 6

LCRA Watershed Ordinance (1,200 square miles, 3 counties, 18 cities, 5 lakes) 7 Found - 50 buffer achieves nearly irreducible pollutant concentrations

Central Texas Stream Buffers 8 LCRA HLWO* City of Austin TCEQ Edwards Aquifer Classification DA (ac) Set back DA (ac) Set back DA (ac) Set back Headwater 5-40 25 5-40 25 Minor 40-128 75 64-320 100 40-128 50 Intermediate 128-320 100 320-640 200 128-320 100 Major 320-640 200 >640 300 320-640 200 Watershed >640 300 >640 300 *Alternative 100-year floodplain plus 25 feet Austin Erosion Hazard Zone in addition to buffers

TCEQ Edwards Aquifer Enhanced Measures Buffers 9

TCEQ Edwards Aquifer Buffers 10

Why buffer zones matter 11 Accelerated runoff and loss of floodplain storage Loss of recharge, habitat, and natural appearance 11

Floodplain Loss 12

Buffers Floodplain Management Tool 13 Wimberley Blanco River May 2015

Upper San Marcos River Buffers Begin at 120 Acres 14

Upper San Marcos River Buffers Begin at 32 Acres 15 18% of land area

Stormwater Detention and Water Quality Basins 16 Sedimentation-Filtration Wet ponds 200 in Austin Flood, WQ, erosion Detention Basins 3,800 in Austin Flood management Recreation options 2,700 in Austin Water quality, erosion

Comparison of Structural Measures to Stream Buffers 17 Management Component Stormwater Management Stream Buffers Measure Design plan requirements High Minimal Design engineer experience High Minimal Plan reviewer experience High Minimal Construction inspection High Minimal Contractor experience Moderate to High N/A Construction quality High N/A Maintenance requirements High Minimal Service life Years to Decades In perpetuity Sustainability Minimal to moderate High Floodplain management Moderate High Resiliency Minimal to moderate High

Buffer Zone Benefits 18 Easy to design and administer Flexible, can be defined by each community Floodplain management/non-mapped areas Preserve natural creek corridors Parkland, hike & bike trail opportunities Erosion control insurance policy Groundwater well setback to protect base flow

Buffer Zone Challenges 19 Developers may claim loss of developable land (economic impact) Cannot serve as a stand-alone measure in a developing watershed (hydrologic change) Could increase wastewater line costs as no longer installed in the creek bed Annexation by adjacent landowners

Storm Drain Outfalls to Buffer Zones 20 Disconnect conveyance Multi-use buffer (filtering) Avoid outfall erosion issues Facilitate maintenance Ease permitting

Stream/Buffer Protection in Developing Watersheds 21 Manage hydrologic change Impervious cover reduction incentives Development design Street/drainage network design Disconnect runoff building sites and outfalls Runoff volume control (flood detention is not enough) Conventional basins Low impact development techniques Simplified design approach TFMA Fall 2017

Stream Buffer Summary 22 Local government administration ease Simple design approach/no construction oversight Minimal maintenance - Resilient Every day ecosystem benefits Recreational opportunities Protect with runoff volume control Stormwater program foundation

Contact Information 23 Tom Hegemier thegemier@apaienv.com 512-496-6823