Tim A. Hansen, P.E. Southern Research Institute ESTCP Symposium November, 2011

Similar documents
Tim A. Hansen, P.E. Southern Research Institute NDIA E2S2 May 2012

Tim A. Hansen, P.E. Southern Research Institute NDIA E2S2 May 2012

Microscale Waste Heat Driven Cooling System

Efficiency & Environmental (E2) Solutions for Small Forward Operating Bases

Navy s Approach to Green and Sustainable Remediation

Geothermal Energy Demonstration at Fort Indiantown Gap

Improving Energy Efficiency at the Watervliet Arsenal

Measurement and simulation of volatile particle emissions from military aircraft

Water Sustainability & Conservation in an Exhaust Cooling Discharge System Case Study

NDCEE. Zero-Energy Housing (ZEH) for Military Installations. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment. Ms. Heidi Anne Kaltenhauser, CTC

Implementation of the Best in Class Project Management and Contract Management Initiative at the U.S. Department of Energy s Office of Environmental

Climate Change Adaptation: U.S. Navy Actions in the Face of Uncertainty

Laura Biszko NSRDEC /03/2011 UNCLASSIFIED

Army Net Zero Installation Initiative and Cost Benefit Analysis Activity

Beyond Canisters (SUMMAs): Passive and Active Samplers and International Perspective

USMC Environmental and Corrosion Control Issues. Andrew Sheetz USMC CPAC Engineering Manager

From Environmental Science to BMP The Canadian Experience

Flexible Photovoltaics: An Update

Sustainability Action Planning and Initiatives at Twentynine Palms Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC) May 2011

Industrial Waste Heat Recovery

Panel 5 - Open Architecture, Open Business Models and Collaboration for Acquisition

Photovoltaic (PV) Systems Comparison at Fort Hood

Kelly Black Neptune & Company, Inc.

FUEL REFORMING TECHNOLOGIES (BRIEFING SLIDES)

Advanced Air Purification Technology Capabilities Assessment

ITEA LVC Special Session on W&A

Renewable Natural Gas Clean-up Challenges and Applications

Issues for Future Systems Costing

DoD Sustainable Buildings. Col Bart Barnhart ODUSD(I&E) May 12, 2011

Trends in Acquisition Workforce. Mr. Jeffrey P. Parsons Executive Director Army Contracting Command

Future Capabilities of GenCade Ashley Frey

Energy Assessment Strategy and Energy Concepts for Industrial Facilities

Earned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price Contracts: The DoD Perspective

Solar Thermal Radiant Heating at Pohakuloa Training Area

Vehicle Thermal Management Simulation at TARDEC

Improvements to Hazardous Materials Audit Program Prove Effective

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

Robustness of Communication Networks in Complex Environments - A simulations using agent-based modelling

Breakout Session 3 Non Hex Cr Treatments for IVD/Electroplated Al, Zn, Zn Alloy Coatings. By: Steve Gaydos And Lorraine Wass May 17, 2007

Buildings in the 21st Century: Ultra Efficient and Business Smart Strategies for Transforming the Nation s Buildings

FINAL REPORT. Demonstration of a Solar Thermal Combined Heating, Cooling and Hot Water System Utilizing an Adsorption Chiller for DoD Installations

Cataloging Green Items

Update on ESTCP Project ER-0918: Field Sampling and Sample Processing for Metals on DoD Ranges. Jay L. Clausen US Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC CRREL

December 13, 2012 Energy Efficient Cooling Information Service Webinar Series Christine Brinker and Gearoid Foley CHP with Absorption Chilling

ROCK STRIKE TESTING OF TRANSPARENT ARMOR NLE-01

309th Commodities Group

STORAGE OF LIMITED QUANTITIES OF EXPLOSIVES AT REDUCED Q-D

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task- Force on UAVs

Application of the HEC-5 Hydropower Routines

Energy Security: A Global Challenge

MicroTurbine CHP Applications for Oil and Gas Industry

Army Quality Assurance & Administration of Strategically Sourced Services

Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facilities (TEMF) Update To The Industry Workshop

NOGAPS/NAVGEM Platform Support

MICROWAVE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION FROM METHANE

UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION and MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND. The Evolution of Protective Covers for Army Aviation and Missile Systems

Ranked Set Sampling: a combination of statistics & expert judgment

Simulation of Dual Firing of Hydrogen and JP-8 in a Swirling Combustor

Distributed Waste to Energy Conversion: A Piece of the DOD s Renewable Energy Puzzle

DoD Installations, Energy and the Environment: The Challenge and Opportunity

Bio-Response Operational Testing & Evaluation (BOTE) Project

Success with the DoD Mentor Protégé Program

1 ISM Document and Training Roadmap. Challenges/ Opportunities. Principles. Systematic Planning. Statistical Design. Field.

Characterizing PCB contamination in Painted Concrete and Substrates: The Painted History at Army Industrial Sites

Sustainable Management of Available Resources and Technology (SMART) Cleanup

Fort Belvoir Compliance-Focused EMS. E2S2 Symposium Session June 16, 2010

Defense Business Board

DoD Solid Waste Diversion

Alternate Fuel and Power in the Forward Deployed Environment

John Sullivan Shelter Technology Engineering & - Special Projects Team. Efficiency LED 2 NOV 2011 UNCLASSIFIED

MEDCOM SUSTAINABILITY

Demonstration of a Solar Thermal Combined Heating, Cooling and Hot Water System Utilizing an Adsorption Chiller for DoD Installations

Processing of Hybrid Structures Consisting of Al-Based Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) With Metallic Reinforcement of Steel or Titanium

Biased Cramer-Rao lower bound calculations for inequality-constrained estimators (Preprint)

Microgrid with Solar Power and Fuel Cell Technology

Implication of Atmospheric Wetness Levels on Corrosion at a Coating Defect during Accelerated Testing

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

USAF Dehumidification Efforts for Corrosion Control

Hybrid Vapor Compression Ejector Cycle: Presentation to IAPG Mechanical Working Group

NDCEE. Landscape Modeling Technologies for Sustainable Forests. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment. Ms. Donna S.

Enhance Facility Energy Management at Naval Expeditionary Base Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti. 12 May 2011

!"#$%&"#'"$( (% +, -

Ultraviolet (UV) Curable Coatings DoD Executive for Bullet Agent Tip Identification

ULTRA HIGH PRESSURE (UHP) TECHNOLOGY (BRIEFING SLIDES)

Heat Recovery. Integrated CHP Systems Corp.

DOD, Climate Change and Energy Background and Initiatives. Bill Van Houten Office of the Secretary of Defense Environmental Management Staff

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

SE Tools Overview & Advanced Systems Engineering Lab (ASEL)

Performance-Based Acquisitions (PBA) E2S2 Conference April 2011

HVOF Hard Chrome Alternatives: Developments, Implementation, Performance and Lessons Learned

Emission Guide Update for Mobile and Stationary Sources at Air Force Installations

U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Rising Oil Prices

SEDD Our Vision. Anand Mudambi. Joseph Solsky USACE USEPA 3/31/2011 1

BUILDING FOR THE FUTURE

Supply Chain Modeling: Downstream Risk Assessment Methodology (DRAM)

Two Approaches to Rehabilitation of Metal Roofing at Wheeler Army Airfield Hawaii

Grinding & Superfinishing. Methods & Specifications

Providing free cooling from low temperature waste heat

Army Ground Vehicle Use of CFD and Challenges

The Nuts and Bolts of Zinc-Nickel

Transcription:

Tim A. Hansen, P.E. Southern Research Institute ESTCP Symposium November, 2011

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE NOV 2011 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2011 to 00-00-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Validating Innovative Renewable Energy Technologies: ESTCP Demonstrations at Two DoD Facilities 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Southern Research Institute,5201 International Drive,Durham,NC,27712 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Presented at the Partners in Environmental Technology Technical Symposium & Workshop, 29 Nov? 1 Dec 2011, Washington, DC. Sponsored by SERDP and ESTCP. U.S. Government or Federal Rights License 14. ABSTRACT With stated goals of 25% of energy consumed required to be from renewable energy by 2025, the DoD has set aggressive, yet achievable targets. With its array of land holdings facilities, and environments, the potential for renewable energy generation on DoD lands is great. Reaching these goals will require implementation of new technologies across the DoD. However many technologies have not undergone technical, economic, or environmental field validation. Wide spread implementation of such technologies may be hindered by the lack of credible information. Two current demonstration projects funded by the ESTCP program will be discussed. The first project utilizes technology provided by Vanir Energy and Power Partners?solar thermal panels to provide hot water to the domestic hot water system and an adsorption chiller, providing 80 tons of cooling capacity to a mess hall at MCRD Parris Island, SC. The second project implements a novel thermal oxidizer?microturbine technology provided by Flex Energy, that allows for the generation of electricity using low BTU waste gases that are typically flared or vented. In this application, the unit is utilizing low BTU methane from a landfill at Fort Benning to produce up to 250 kw of electricity. Information on system design, operation, and impacts?economic payback, emission reductions and renewable energy production will be provided. The applicability of the technologies throughout DoD will also be discussed?including the potential landfill sites throughout DoD where the turbine technology could be applied, and the primary solar energy resources available at DoD facilities. 15. SUBJECT TERMS

16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 30 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Renewable Energy on DoD Installations Technical Session No. 3C DEMONSTRATION OF TWO RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES FOR DOD INSTALLATIONS SOLAR CHILLING AND LANDFILL GAS-TO-ENERGY MR. TIM HANSEN Southern Research Institute 5201 International Drive Durham, NC 27712 (919) 282-1052 hansen@sri.org CO-PERFORMERS: Wes Kowalczuk and Eric Ringler (Southern Research); Paul Fukumoto (Flex Energy); Steve Hunter (Vanir Energy); Vernon Duck and Dorinda Morpeth (Fort Benning); Richard Pierce (MCRD Parris Island) W ith stated goals of 25% of energy consumed required to be from renewable energy by 2025, the DoD has set aggressive, yet achievable targets. With its array of land holdings, facilities, and environments, the potential for renewable energy generation on DoD lands is great. Reaching these goals will require implementation of new technologies across the DoD. However, many technologies have not undergone technical, economic, or environmental field validation. Wide spread implementation of such technologies may be hindered by the lack of credible information. Two current demonstration projects funded by the ESTCP program will be discussed. The first project utilizes technology provided by Vanir Energy and Power Partners solar thermal panels to provide hot water to the domestic hot water system and an adsorption chiller, providing 80 tons of cooling capacity to a mess hall at MCRD Parris Island, SC. The second project implements a novel thermal oxidizer microturbine technology provided by Flex Energy, that allows for the generation of electricity using low BTU waste gases that are typically flared or vented. In this application, the unit is utilizing low BTU methane from a landfill at Fort Benning to produce up to 250 kw of electricity. Information on system design, operation, and impacts economic payback, emission reductions, and renewable energy production will be provided. The applicability of the technologies throughout DoD will also be discussed including the potential landfill sites throughout DoD where the turbine technology could be applied, and the primary solar energy resources available at DoD facilities. C-72

Lead Organization: Southern Research Institute Co Performers: U.S. EPA s Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program FlexEnergy (Microturbine Supplier) Vanir Energy (Solar Chiller System Supplier) Power Partners (Adsorption Chiller Supplier) Host Sites: Fort Benning, GA 1 st Division Road Landfill MCRD Parris Island, SC Mess Hall Funding & Support: ESTCP Projects EW 0823 and EW 0928

America s largest energy consumer Over 300,000 buildings at over 500 domestic installations ~$3.5 Billion/yr on facility energy (28% of DoD total) ~40% of DoD GHGs http://www.acq.osd.mil/ie/energy/dod_aemr_fy2010 July_2011[1][1].pdf DUS (I&E) D. Robyn. Govenergy, 2010

Renewable Energy goals influenced or set by: EPAct 2005 National Defense Strategy June 2008] Executive Order 13423 National Defense Authorization Act 2007 2007 EISA Progress made, but a long way to go

Installation Energy Test Bed Initiative Prove out innovative systems via in field demonstration and validation: Economics Environmental Operability (install, operate, maintain) Regulatory, permitting, approvals Encourages adoption and more rapid commercialization and installation http://www.serdp estcp.org/featured Initiatives/Installation Energy.

SOUTHERN. RESEARCH Legendary Disco~'erie s. (oding Innovation.

Total Number of Landfills 6 21 73 Air Force Army Potential Power Generation 300 kw Minimum Marines 22.8 6 Potential MW Number of Sites Navy 4.3 4 121 250 Navy Marines Army 46 74.7 Other Often vented or flared Many sites low quality gas No gas collection Environmental issues Air Force 6.0 7 0 20 40 60 80 Baseload Renewable Power Reduce Emissions (GHG, other) Independent Energy Source Make $ Instead of Spending

Traditional Systems (Engine or Turbine): 350 BTU/scf May not meet emission standards (CARB) Complex gas conditioning and cleanup Flex Powerstation FP 250 50 BTU/scf minimum Very low NOx and CO Minimal, simple gas cleanup No fuel compressor

Parameter Nominal Electrical Output Minimum Fuel Strength Minimum Fuel Supply Pressure NOx, CO Concentration in Exhaust Gas Heat Rate Exhaust Gas Temperature System Weight System Footprint Specification 250 kw 50 Btu/scf 2 5 psig <1 ppm 3,750,000 btu/hr 450 500 F 54,000 lbs 20 ft x 12 ft

The diluted gas air mix is compressed and pre heated by the gas turbine Methane gas generated by landfill is controlled and gathered by site collection system Fuel is aspirated with air forming a 1.5% methane (15 Btu/cubic foot) mix at the inlet to the gas turbine. The renewable electricity created from flared gas is now available for use by the site or sold to the grid The pressurized preheated mixture is oxidized in the Flexidizer. The near zero emission gas leaves the Flexidizer and powers the gas turbine. The clean hot gas energy is converted to electricity.

48 acres MSW and mixed waste 2.3 million cubic yards / 1 million tons waste Operated 1985 1998 Methane migrating off site 39 collection wells Existing LFG flare

Commissioned September 29, 2011 Dedicated November 8, 2011

Complete independent verification testing Monitor for one year Emissions and destruction efficiency evaluation ETV Generic Protocol for DG CHP Verification as basis for monitoring, instrumentation, and data analysis

Parameter Result to Date Total Hours * 313 Total MWh (Gross) 85.4 Total MWh (Net) 80.7 Average Output Avoided CO 2 e 221 kw 18.6 tons Electricity Savings $1817 ($3326) Projected Annual Savings Projected CO2 Avoidance $113,861 ($196,502) 1285 tpy CO 2 e

Continued Operation and Monitoring Emissions Testing early 2012 Second installation finalizing site selection Guidance Document development System improvements (Flex Energy)

SOUTHERN RESEARCH legendary Discoveries. (e-.ding Innovation.

Estimates show that 38% of building electricity use is related to cooling (LBNL) Many steam (nat. gas) driven chillers also Many opportunities for energy and cost savings to meet DoD goals

Use proven solar thermal to provide low grade heat (hot water) Use adsorption chiller driven by low grade heat or steam to provide cooling Offsets electricity or natural gas usage of traditional systems Reduces GHG emissions Reduces operating costs Can also provide hot water or space heating for optimum efficiency

Use low grade or waste heat Driven by hot water Low energy consumption Low maintenance Water (refrigerant) and silica gel (dessicant) Cool water removes heat Vapor condensed and sent to evaporator Operates at near full vacuum Water vapor adsorbed by silica gel Evaporation creates cooling Hot water evaporates adsorbed water

250.00 200.00 150.00 100.00 50.00 0.00 COP of 0.57; Average hot water =160 F 76 RT capacity Supply temp = 58F Chilled Water Temp = 49 F (avg.) Max RT = 109 @ COP = 0.43 Temperature (deg F) 11:20:30 AM 11:22:35 AM 11:24:40 AM 11:26:45 AM 11:28:50 AM 11:30:55 AM 11:33:00 AM 11:35:05 AM 11:37:10 AM 11:39:15 AM 11:41:20 AM 11:43:25 AM 11:45:30 AM 11:47:35 AM 11:49:40 AM 11:51:45 AM 11:53:50 AM 11:55:55 AM 11:58:00 AM 12:00:05 PM 12:02:10 PM 12:04:15 PM 12:06:20 PM 12:08:25 PM 12:10:30 PM 12:12:35 PM 12:14:40 PM 12:16:45 PM 12:18:50 PM 12:20:55 PM 12:23:00 PM Temperature Data Time CTs CTr HW s HWr

80 RT adsorption chiller 84 roof mounted evacuated tube collectors Supports a max. 38 RT load on chiller Steam backup and peaking 1,000 gallon hot water storage tank Capability for full operation on steam New, larger capacity cooling tower Pumps, piping, instrumentation, controls Existing 60RT electric chiller Solar for hot water heating when not chilling

Building 590 1 st Battalion Mess Hall Formerly steam for heat, cooling, and hot water Steam driven LiBr absorption chiller, supplemental electric compressor chiller Trane Chiller with ~90 RT capacity & nameplate COP of 0.62 Cool roof & rooftop solar panels reduce cooling requirement to <80 RT

Installation and commissioning near completion System, BOP, and control modifications / optimization being implemented To be completed by end of year

Solar Loop Temp + Flow Temp + Power + RT TT5601 (F) TT5602 (F) FV5601 (gpm) TT5701 (F) PM5601/2 (kw) 300.0 10.00 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 2.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 10/20/11 0:00 10/21/11 0:00 10/22/11 0:00 10/23/11 0:00 10/24/11 0:00 10/25/11 0:00 10/26/11 0:00 10/27/11 0:00 Chiller Loop TT5301 (F) TT5302 (F) PM5802 (kw) Q_chiller (RT) 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 10/20/11 0:00 10/21/11 0:00 10/22/11 0:00 10/23/11 0:00 10/24/11 0:00 10/25/11 0:00 10/26/11 0:00 10/27/11 0:00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 Power 6-Day Run Analysis (Preliminary) Average Output 32tons Solar Fraction 17% COP 0.43 Chiller Load Contribution 69% Cumulative Array Output 18.2MMBtu Cumulative Steam Use 91.1MMBtu

Areas with greater solar radiation will see a greater benefit and shorter payback periods. By avoiding the use of steam and electricity, progress is made toward GHG reduction and renewable energy goals 203 tpy CO2 offsets 752 MWh renewable energy equivalent at 50% solar fraction Projections yield favorable economics (based on acceptance test) Solar Fraction Annual Savings Economic Benefits Payback Period (yrs) Net Present Value (20 yr life) 50% $ 119,328 7.23 $ 1,160,527 40% $ 95,462 9.20 $ 770,289 30% $ 71,596 12.66 $ 380,051 17% $ 40,571 24.87 $ (127,256)

Official one year monitoring period will begin upon completion of steam line replacement. Guidance document and tool for site feasibility evaluation Final performance analysis report (early 2013) Chiller manufacturer scaling up and down to meet diverse market (10 330RT)

Expect the unexpected Baselines are often difficult, and site specific Technologies can work well, but Integration, retrofit, or balance of plant are key Existing equipment can have major impacts Approvals? Permits? Theory or Lab Reality Short term long term Success can be site specific

DoD Landfill Database and Report available Guidance documents being developed with feasibility assessment tools Final Reports late 2012 Site Visits welcome

Contact: Tim A Hansen, P.E. Program Manager, Clean Energy Demonstrations Southern Research Institute hansen@southernresearch.org 919.282.1052 Jim Galvin Program Manager, Energy & Water ESTCP