Reducing Runoff from. Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots FINAL REPORT

Similar documents
Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Lake Minnewaska Phase 1 Resource Investigation

Welcome to Round 3 of the Zumbro River WRAPS Meetings Held in Theilman, Oronoco, and Rochester on November 15 and 16, 2016

Grant All-Detail Report Feedlot

Final Report Section 319 and Clean Water Partnership Projects

Root River One Watershed, One Plan Request for Proposals Proposals DUE: Wednesday, December 3, 2014, 4:00 PM

Shaina Keseley MPCA-Rochester Watershed Project Manager

Grant All-Detail Report Feedlot

Long Prairie River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) Report Summary

South Branch Bacteria Reduction Project Final Report

Feedlot Construction Setbacks from Open Water and Wells

Feedlot Financial Needs Report

C. Staffing Needs Approximately 150 staff days TSA #3 staff time will also be utilized.

Shell Rock River Watershed: Water Plans

Comprehensive Plan

Water Plans. Water Plans: Houston County LWMP amended 2012 Winona County LWMP

Rice SWCD 2018 Annual Plan of Work

Water Governance Evaluation

PART VI MINNESOTA COASTAL NONPOINT SOURCE PROGRAM

Grand Marais Creek WRAP Stakeholder Meeting. April 18, 2013

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Local Government Annual Reporting System

FY Biennial Budget Request Mille Lacs SWCD

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

MGWA Spring Conference April 19, 2012

Crow Wing Soil and Water Conservation District Annual Plan

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality Collecting Land Use Data for TMDLs

Byllesby Reservoir Phosphorus TMDL Public Meeting & Open House May 13, 2013 Phillippo Scout Reservation

REVISED REGIONAL TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD. Fecal Coliform Bacteria Impairments In the Lower Mississippi River Basin Of Southeast Minnesota

Mississippi River Winona Watershed: Water Plans

(Must be a county, city, township, watershed district, watershed management organization or joint powers organization.)

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING April 4, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN

REGIONAL TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD. Study of Fecal Coliform Bacteria Impairments In the Lower Mississippi River Basin Of Southeast Minnesota

STEELE COUNTY MEDFORD RAIN GARDENS. Water of Concern Cannon River TMDL. Impairment Turbidity. CWL Funding by Category

Reducing Phosphorus Loads to Lake Betsy by Protecting Willow Creek

Cannon River Watershed Plan Development: Work Plan

City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Annual Public Meeting. June 11, 2018

Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Program FY 2006 Project Grant Application

Keeping it Green and Growing: An Aerial Seeding Concept

Using PTMApp Products to Develop a Targeted Implementation Schedule

How is Water Quality Affected by Land Use?

City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) January 23, 2017

2011 Report. The purpose of this report is to briefly discuss items that were completed in 2011.

Voluntary Water Quality Conservation Plan

Water Quality in Southeast Texas Brian Koch Regional Watershed Coordinator Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board Clean Waters Initiative

Ohio River Basin Water Quality Trading Pilot Project Application: INDIANA Applications Deadline 5pm ET, August 15, 2018

Projects and Practices Application

BWSR PROGRAMS THAT ADDRESS NUTRIENT LOSS

Our Vision of the Future

RIVER WATCHER NEWSLETTER High Island Creek & Rush River Watershed 319 TMDL Projects

Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association. Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014

West Fork Des Moines River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Project Semi-Annual Meeting Wednesday, October 24, :00 a.m.

MORRISON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

DRAFT Budget and Outcomes Committee FY18-19 Clean Water Fund recommendations (July 8, 2016)

Thief River Watershed Plan Development: Work Plan

Role of Watershed Districts in Ag Conservation Bruce Albright, BRRWD Administrator

PTMApp. Prioritize, Target, and Measure Application

2008 Combined Clean Water Legacy Grant Application Id#: Use TAB key to move from field to field

3D WETLAND MANAGEMENT

SOUTHEASTERN MN REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COUNCIL

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan

One Watershed, One Plan Operating Procedures

Subject: Joint Powers Agreement with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for the Watershed Outlet Monitoring Program

M.L Project Abstract For the Period Ending June 30, 2014

Alternative Tile Intake Cost-Share Program

How does the MN P index relate to MPCA policies?

Annual Plan of Work 2009

City of San Juan Capistrano. Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Steve May, Public Works and Utilities Director 4-tUA.

Biennial Report to the Minnesota Legislature

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING January 10, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN

Bacon Creek Watershed Plan Implementation Chapter 3: Learning More - Monitoring to Secure New Data Draft

Some Context behind the Implementation of Numeric Nutrient Criteria or Why do we have these Water Quality Regulations?

WATER RESOURCES DRAFT 2040 CARVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

Table G - 7. Mitigation Actions Identified for Implementation by the City of Eyota ( ) (From Olmsted County Master Mitigation Action Chart)

ffiel Cannon River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load

Urban Conservation: District & State

MORRISON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT

JUNE 2007 WATER QUALITY PROGRAM PROGRESS SUMMARY 2007

Nonpoint Priority Funding Plan for Clean Water Implementation Funding

NRCS has provided a summary report of activities in the Chesapeake Bay watershed in Pennsylvania between 2008 and 2015 for Committee members today.

Ann River Watershed TMDL Restoration Plan

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Funding, Progress, and Other Issues Regarding Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution

Clean Water Fund Appropriations

2018 Performance Review and Assistance Program

Grant All-Detail Report Projects and Practices 2015

Actions Target Date Individuals Responsible 1. Adopt an annual budget of revenues and expenditures July 7, 2017 SWCD Board and Staff

Isanti Soil and Water Conservation District Strategic Framing

One Watershed, One Plan

MORRISON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

CARNELIAN-MARINE- ST. CROIX WATERSHED DISTRICT COST SHARE PROGRAM 2013 ANNUAL REPORT PREPARED BY: WASHINGTON CONSERVATION DISTRICT

Executive Summary Amendment Section 1. Executive Summary

Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program

Past Studies in the Clearwater River Watershed. Past Studies MPCA Lost River Investigation. Past Studies Clearwater River Nonpoint Study

Final TMDL Implementation Plan. Prepared for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Beth Neuendorf, MnDOT Metro Water Resources Engineer. Barb Loida, MnDOT Metro MS4 Engineer Environmental Workshop

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments:

Pomme de Terre One Watershed, One Plan Request for Proposal Responses DUE: May 19 th, 2017

Transcription:

Section 319 Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots FINAL REPORT Submitted by Bridgette M. Timm Southeast Minnesota Water Resources Board October 20, 2017

This project was conducted with a grant from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Contract No. 66693). Table of Contents Grant Project Summary... 2 Grant Funding... 2 Executive Summary of Project... 3 Pictures... 4 Acronyms... 4 Partnerships... 4 Body of Main Report... 5 Section I Work Plan Review (A brief report of each activity in the work plan)... 5 Section II Grant Results... 6 Measurements... 6 Products... 7 Public Outreach.... 7 Long-term results Project Evaluation... 7 Section III Final Expenditures... 7 Final Report: Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots Page 1

Final 319 Project Report Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots Grant Project Summary Project title: Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots Organization (Grantee): Southeast Minnesota Water Resources Board Project start date: 02/01/2014 Project end date: 09/30/2017 Report submittal date: 10/20/2017 Grantee contact name: Bridgette Timm Title: Director Address: 2212 Campus Drive SE, Suite 200 City: Rochester State: MN Zip: 55904 Phone number: 507-779-8569 Fax: E-mail: Timm.bridgette@co.olmsted.mn.us Basin: Lower Mississippi River Basin in Minnesota - 07040001 County: Dodge, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Mower, Olmsted, Rice, Steele, Winona and Wabasha Project type (check one): Clean Water Partnership (CWP) Diagnostic CWP Implementation Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development 319 Implementation 319 Demonstration, Education, Research TMDL Implementation Grant Funding Final grant amount: $299,964.00 Final total project costs: $572,743.00 Matching funds: Final cash: $216,000.00 Final in-kind: $56,779 Final Loan: $0 Contract number: 66693 MPCA project manager: Justin Watkins For TMDL/WRAPS development or TMDL/WRAPS implementation projects only Impaired reach name(s): Regional project addressing numerous impairments AUID or DNR Lake ID(s): Listed pollutant(s): 303(d) List scheduled start date: AUID = Assessment Unit ID DNR = Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Scheduled completion date: Final Report: Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots Page 2

Executive Summary of Project This grant titled Reducing Runoff from Southeast Minnesota Feedlots was developed from a basin-wide response to the findings of a Regional Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study approved in 2006 that identified 39 stream reaches of the Lower Mississippi River Basin in Minnesota (the Basin) as posing a risk of human illness from excessive levels of fecal coliform bacteria. The TMDL study found that runoff from feedlots or manure stockpiles without runoff controls comprises an estimated loading of fecal coliform bacteria to streams of 17% during a wet spring and 37% during a wet summer. To achieve water quality standards, the Regional TMDL Implementation Plan calls for reducing bacteria impairments from all major sources by an average of 65%. One of several strategies for reaching this goal includes providing assistance for accelerated compliance with the state feedlot rules. Waterbody Improved The regional scale of this project allowed for numerous feedlots contributing fecal coliform to be addressed and pollution loads to be reduced. No one stream was targeted in this project, however, the cumulative effect of the feedlot fixes throughout the region will likely contribute to the mitigation of fecal coliform in the listed reaches in this region. The impaired waters list indicates that fecal coliform-impaired reaches and their contributing watersheds occur in all ten counties that implemented feedlot fixes through this grant. Project Highlights A successful strategy used in the Basin to reach runoff reduction goals has been to build local capacity for accelerating producer compliance with state feedlot rules. Employing this strategy in five previous regional feedlot projects, 2,295 producers in the region signed up for the Open Lot Agreement, runoff reduction designs for over 1,500 feedlots have been completed, and 520 projects were completed through the first five feedlot grants with very low 50% cost-share funding of $1,000 - $15,000, plus technical assistance. The goal of the Southeast Regional Grant for Water Quality was for 30 open lot feedlots under 500 animal units to reduce their runoff levels to negligible levels through technical assistance and costshare funding for relatively low-cost solutions. This goal was to be accomplished by the following means: Partners and Evaluation Technical Assistance: SEMWRB, partnering with the SE SWCD Technical Support JPB (SE SWCD JPB), Counties and SWCD s will provide 30 livestock producers with technical assistance to design and implement lowcost fixes to control polluted runoff. Cost-Share: SEMWRB will manage cost share funding in coordination with Counties and SWCD s. This partnership is set up and ready to go, and through this project will provide 50% cost share, typically at or under $15,000 per fix, for small livestock producers (under 500 animal units) to implement feedlot runoff treatment. Engineering Technical Assistance; SE SWCD JPB has 14 years of experience coordinating regional grants for feedlot engineering assistance in Southeast Minnesota. These engineers provide needed support to local feedlot staff in the design of small feedlot fixes. SEMWRB will partner with SE SWCD JPB to retain one primary engineer and two additional regional engineering technical staff to provide enhanced engineering assistance for feedlot design. Evaluation; The average before and after percent drop in the amount (mass) of fecal coliform in MinnFARM examples from 4 feedlots in Winona County was calculated at approximately 98%. The following additional reductions were expected through this project based on the average reductions from 4 feedlots in Winona County: 70,900 lbs/year COD, 1,270 lbs/year P, 3,890 lbs/year N, and 15,780 lbs/year BOD. Results County/SWCD staff and regional engineers worked with livestock producers of under 500 animal units, providing technical assistance to design, plan and implement feedlot runoff controls. SE SWCD Technical Support Joint Powers Board had 3 engineering staff working primarily on Feedlot Runoff Control Projects in coordination with the this grant throughout the 10 Counties covered by this grant and providing assistance to local feedlot staff for design and construction of larger fixes. Weather delayed a few A total of 25 different feedlot fixes were completed because of this project. These specific fixes resulted in an annual Fecal Coliform reduction of 1.55E+16 based on MinnFarm reductions estimations. This is a total reduction of 95% from original estimates. There was an average Fecal Coliform reduction of 83% per feedlot fix with a majority of fixes reducing over 96%. Additional annual pollutant reductions associated with these fixes according to MinnFarm calculations include Final Report: Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots Page 3

906.26 lbs. of phosphorus, 2,2234.59 lbs. of Nitrogen, 29,473.9 lbs in Chemical Oxygen Demand and 16,547 in Biological Oxygen Demand Picture See attached Project examples Acronyms OLA Open Lot Agreement SWCD Soil and Water Conservation District CFO County Feedlot Officer BWSR Board of Water and Soil Resources SE Tech Support JPB Southeast Technical Support Joint Powers Board TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load SEMWRB Southeast Minnesota Water Resources Board LGU Local Government Unit Partnerships Project partners include the Counties and/or SWCD s of Dodge, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Mower, Olmsted, Rice, Steele, Wabasha, and Winona. County Feedlot Officers in these counties were sub-contracted to complete the project goals. Area engineering staff through the SE Technical Support JPB assisted Feedlot Officers with design and installation of the more complicated fixes. Final Report: Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots Page 4

Body of Main Report Section I Work Plan Review Approved Work Plan Changes: The original work plan and budget had one amendment and one change order occur during the grant period, however, the overall project costs never changed. The grant amendment was approved to move $49,379 from the cost-share objective to the technical assistance objective. The project timeline was also extended from August 2017 to September 2017. A change order was approved in September 2017 to allow for funds to be moved from cost-share to technical assistance objectives. Landowners for two projects required more time to finalize their feedlot fixes and canceled their project contracts. Because of the limited time to find new projects to utilize the remaining funds, $10,553.00 was moved from the cost share objective and distributed to the technical assistance objective and project management objective. Objective 1: Technical Assistance; Local Governmental Units (LGUs) will provide feedlot producers of fewer than 500 AU s with technical assistance in designing low-cost fixes to correct and treat polluted runoff. Sub-recipient agreements were developed with Counties and SWCD s for encumbering cost share dollars. Initial agreements were developed with the assistance of the Olmsted County Attorney. Allocations were made using the county s final number of small feedlot owners as a guide. At the end of the first sub-recipient agreement period, remaining funds were redistributed based on need and demonstrated ability to use the funding. In the final months of the project, funds were again reallocated from counties that were not able to complete projects to other counties that showed a need and ability to spend funds appropriately. Local Government Units (County and SWCD) managed their cost share allocations and developed cost share contracts with landowners to implement feedlot fixes. LGU s submitted semi-annual reports of assistance provided, runoff reduction estimates and invoice documentation. A total of 25 producers were provided technical assistance to complete pollution reduction projects. Numerous other landowners were provided technical assistance and education on pollution abatement for potential projects to be cost-shared in the future. Objective 2: Small feedlot owners receive cost-share funding to assist with low-cost fix implementation. The individual LGU determines the level of cost-share funding (with a maximum of typically less than $15,000) to offer producers that will be most effective in their area. Local feedlot technical staff or contractors, with the assistance of regional engineering support staff, designed low-cost fixes to correct and treat polluted runoff on feedlots under 500 animal units. Engineering staff of the SE SWCD Technical Support JPB provided necessary professional engineering assistance to completed site investigations, surveys, develop cost estimates for BMP alternatives that fit the sites, design BMPs, and assist with construction of feedlot runoff control practices. LGU s and Engineers submitted semi-annual reports of progress, including landowner name, number of animal units, type of assistance provided, the level of fix completed, before and after runoff model numbers, itemization of grant funds for reimbursement and in-kind documentation. Design and technical assistance led to pollution reduction on 25 feedlots. Individual projects varied depending on site specific needs and included such fixes as manure storage, milk house waste systems, buffers, stacking slabs and clean water diversions. Objective 3: Project Management The Executive Director of the Southeast Minnesota Water Resources Board (SEMWRB) was the project manager. The project manager developed terms of sub-recipient agreements with counties and SWCDs for cost share and technical assistance, revised semi-annual county reporting forms to determine that counties met their contract obligations, provided coordination between all project partners, and reported progress to the SEMWRB Final Report: Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots Page 5

joint powers board and project partners on a regular basis. The project manager also maintained the project budget and account, procured an annual audit of financial records and reimbursed counties on a semi-annual basis. Semi-annual reporting requirements to the grantor were met. Section II Grant Results Measurements To evaluate the success of all feedlot fixes, a unified reporting form was developed and maintained to track implementation fixes utilizing cost-share funds. Each county submitted their progress via the Unified Reporting Form biannually along with invoices for project reimbursements. The report includes fields for the name of the producer served through grant funds, type of fix implemented, whether the fix was in a priority area, the number of animal units, and the before and after MinnFarm runoff reduction results for each lot. The cumulative report of completed fixes compiled for this grant and past grant cycles is attached: FL_Unified Reporting Form_ cumulative.xlsx. The total load reductions for all feedlot fixes in this grant cycle are listed in the table below. Overall load reductions for this Feedlot grant run with the MinnFARM model: MinnFarm* (annual load model) Goal Reductions Annual COD (lbs.) 70,900 29,473.94 Annual Phosphorus (lbs.) 1,270 906.29 Annual Nitrogen (lbs.) 3,890 2,234.59 Annual Fecal (cfu) 98% 1.55E+16 (95%) Annual BOD5 (lbs.) 15,780 16,547 Products Products and documents that have been produced through this grant include the following attachments: Unified Reporting Form (FL_Unified Reporting Form_ cumulative.xlsx) Project example with photos (Project example write up TSA Engineer) Public outreach: Public outreach was not part of the workplan. Long-term results: The methods employed in this grant were designed to build local capacity to meet the challenges of polluted feedlot runoff from small livestock farms in southeast Minnesota. An existing partnership among the county and SWCD feedlot managers was strengthened through partnership with the SE Technical Support JPB to provide engineering support for more complicated fixes. The results of this project include improved regional collaboration and technical knowledge of local staff to identify and prioritize needs and to find appropriate solutions given landscape constraints of steeply sloped lands of SE Minnesota and economic constraints of small livestock producers. The success of this local collaboration will Final Report: Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots Page 6

enhance the ability to implement runoff reduction fixes in the long-term and demonstrates the capacity and capability of project partners to work on a regional project scale for future grant projects related to feedlot pollution abatement. The continued success of this project has proven worth the on-going efforts by all grant partners. This project will continue with assistance from a MPCA Federal 319 grant for an additional four years with the project titled Reducing Bacteria from SE MN Feedlots. This phase has a goal to provide technical and cost-share assistance for 30 feedlots fixes to mitigate fecal coliform bacteria pollution in run-off from open-lot feedlots. Additional targeting of open lot feedlots in priority areas identified in local WRAPS and TMDL reports will occur at the start in order for local feedlot staff to better prioritize their cost-share projects. Project development and accomplishments were shared with the Southeast Minnesota Water Resources Board (SEMWRB), SE MN Water Resources Advisory committee (WRAC) and MPCA staff. Pollution reductions achieved through this grant will be shared with SEMWRB and WRAC along with local county feedlot staff and SWCD staff to inform them of regional accomplishments and provide discussion of best management practices for future feedlot fixes. A detailed historical analysis of pollution reductions achieved over the life of this and past grant activities is planned to occur during the 2018-2021 grant cycle. Section III Final Expenditures Budget -Expenses The total amount expended from each budget object is outlined below. For further details please see the attached Expense Report: FLVI cash and in-kind expenses.xls Objective Total Expense Budgeted Remaining Technical Assistance $49,951.60 $50,000.00 $48.40 Cost Share Funding $218,670.84 $218,826.00 $155.16 Project Management $30,941.00 $31,138.00 $197.00 Total Project $299,563.44 $299,964.00 $400.56 In-Kind Match $32,387.29 $56,779.00 $24,391.71 Cash Match $357,712.39 $216,000.00 -$141,712.39 Total Match $390,099.68 $272,779.00 -$117,320.68 Final Report: Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots Page 7

Final project budget Cost Category Unit Quantity Quantity Quantity In-Kind In-Kind Match Match Grant Grant Total Total Cost Amended Change Amended Cash Cash Cash Cash Budget Budget Order Amended Amended Change Order Amended Change Order OBJECTIVE 1 - TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE LPT Staff 40.00 /hr. 2,625 1,535 hrs. 15,000.00 20,779.00 40,621.00 50,000.00 61,400.00 70,779.00 Landowner Time 15.00 /hr. 2,400 36,000.00 36,000.00 36,000.00 36,000.00 OBJECTIVE 1 - TOTAL 51,000.00 56,779.00 0.00 0.00 40,621.00 50,000.00 97,400.00 106,779.00 OBJECTIVE 2 - BMP COST SHARE FUNDING Landowner Cost-Share 229,379.00 218,826.00 229,379.00 218,826.00 Landowner Cash Match 200,000.00 210,000.00 210,000.00 210,000.00 OBJECTIVE 2 - TOTAL 0.00 200,000.00 210,000.00 229,379.00 218,826.00 439,379.00 428,826.00 OBJECTIVE 3 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Manager - SEMWRB 44.00 /hr. 681 708 hrs. 29,964.00 31,138.00 29,964.00 31,138.00 Office Space - Winona State University (WSU) 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 OBJECTIVE 3 - TOTAL 0.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 29,964.00 31,138.00 35,964.00 37,138.00 ITEMIZED BUDGET OBJECTIVE 1 - TOTAL 51,000.00 56,779.00 0.00 0.00 40,621.00 50,000.00 97,400.00 106,779.00 OBJECTIVE 2 - TOTAL 0.00 200,000.00 210,000.00 229,379.00 218,826.00 439,379.00 428,826.00 OBJECTIVE 3 - TOTAL 0.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 29,964.00 31,138.00 35,964.00 37,138.00 G R A N D T O T A L FTE 0.93 51,000.00 56,779.00 206,000.00 216,000.00 299,964.00 299,964.00 572,743.00 572,743.00 Final Gantt Chart PROJECT NAME:REDUCING RUNOFF FROM SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA FEEDLOTS Revised Attachment A CR 7007, SWIFT 66693 Year 2014 Year 2015 Year 2016 Year 2017 F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D OBJECTIVE 1: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Task A Technical Assistance Sub-task 1Develop Sub-agreements with LGUs X X X X Sub-task 2LGU's Complete designs and installations X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Sub-task 3LGU's submit reports and invoices for TA X X X X X X X X X Timeline: February 2014 to August 31, 2017 September 30, 2017 OBJECTIVE 2: COST SHARE Task A Cost Share Funding Sub-task 1Develop sub-agreements with LGU's X X X X Sub-task 2LGU manage cost share funds X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Sub-task 3LGU's submit reports and invoices for cost-share X X X X X X X X X Timeline: February 2014 to August 31, 2017 September 30, 2017 OBJECTIVE 3: PROJECT MANAGEMENT Task A Sub-task 1Develop reporting forms X X Sub-task 2coordination among partners X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Sub-task 3Manage budget and accounts X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Sub-task 4Semi-annual and final project reporting X X X X X X X X X Timeline: February 2014 to August 31, 2017 September 30, 2017 Final Report: Reducing Runoff from Southeastern Minnesota Feedlots Page 8