Hydraulic Modeling and System Optimization

Similar documents
Hydraulic Modeling, PUDs & Managing Water System Growth

SYSTEM ID: KY 10 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION

SYSTEM ID: KY 3 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION

ADVANCED WATER DISTRIBUTION MODELING AND MANAGEMENT

Hydraulic Modeling Predicting and Resolving Water Quality Issues

Table of Contents. 3.1 Source Capacity Analysis

Storage and pumping capacity analysis using hydraulic modeling

Montara Water and Sanitary District 2011 New Customer CIP and Water Capacity Charge. Presentation to Board April 21, 2011

Section 7 Hydraulic Model Development and Evaluation Criteria

Utilities are constantly striving to

The Next Generation Of Network Management And Leakage Detection Systems

SYSTEM ID: New York Tunnels System

Report. Lake Water Supply Hydraulic Modeling. Village of. Lindenhurst, IL. April 2012

About Me. Overview. Seattle Regional Water System. Seattle Regional Water System. Water System Analysis and Design at Seattle Public Utilities

CHAPTER 4 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS

Partnership for Safe Water Distribution System Optimization Program. Barbara Martin, AWWA

ENERGY EFFICIENY OF WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN

Session 2 Pump Selection. Mark Markham, P.E. Gresham, Smith and Partners September 14, 2017

Before 1990, roughly 116 wastewater

PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN. (HAL Project No.: )

Partnership for Safe Water: Distribution System Optimization Program. Adam Feffer San Jose Water Company November 8, 2017

BUILDING A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE. Madison Water Utility Infrastructure Management Plan

ENGINEERING REPORT WATER SUPPLY

Section 9 Distribution System Analysis

Energy Savings in Water and Wastewater Systems

Anew approach to prioritizing water

Hydraulic Analysis Comparing Efficiency of One and Two Zone Pressure Water Systems

Hydraulic Modeling Assisting in Water Quality. Jinghua Jing Xiao, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Planning Engineer SE PA-AWWA Fall Conference 2018

Section V WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM DESIGN GUIDELINES

Section 5 - Planning Criteria. Section 5

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

EPANET. Ivan Solinas

UNIFORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FOR EXTENDING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SECTION 2 DESIGN STANDARDS

Leveraging Hydraulic Models

SAWEA Workshop 2010 Innovative Water and Wastewater Networks Presented by Greg Welch, AECOM

Intermittent Water Supplies An International Update. By Richard Taylor, Thomas Civil & Environmental Consultants h PWC 14-9 September 2014

Water System Modeling A Unique Way to Use Meter Technology. John Brady, PE x 1121

WATER SUPPLY CHALLENGES FOR AN ISLAND COMMUNITY

Increasing the efficiency of water distribution

CHAPTER 4 Hydraulic Model Management and Documentation Protocols

Distribution Reservoir Management: Evaluating & Maintaining Water Quality in Reservoirs & Tanks

Index. Note: f. indicates a figure; t. indicates a table.

Teton County Solid Waste Transfer Station Water Supply Study

SALEM CITY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CULINARY AND SECONDARY WATER MASTER PLAN 5/2/2018

Why does my water bill cost so much?

City of Richland Comprehensive Water System Plan

Water distribution systems throughout

Water Treatment Plant and Water Supply Study CITY OF SNOHOMISH, WASHINGTON

AR No. # Efficient Irrigation

NZQA registered unit standard version 4 Page 1 of 5

OTCO 12/11/13 Water Audits Meter Testing & Leaks

QC Analytical Water Treatment/Distribution Conference

UDF is Easier in the Office: Pilot Testing a System with Wells Equipped with Variable Frequency Drives

ScienceDirect. Numerical model of a district water distribution system in Bucharest. A.-M. Georgescu a, *, S. Perju a, S.-C. Georgescu b, A.

INTEGRATION OF GIS WITH HYDRAULIC TRANSIENT MODELING: EXPLORING BENEFITS, APPLICATIONS AND IMPACT ON MODEL SKELETONIZATION

APPENDIX B. WSSC Design Criteria for Water Distribution Systems

CUPSS Community CUPSS Call Community December 10, 2014

Susceptibility of PWS to Negative Pressure Transients

UNIT WELL 15 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND (VOC) MITIGATION

Prof. M. S. Mohan Kumar and Usha Manohar Department of Civil Engineering and CiSTUP Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

Distribution System Upgrades to Improve Water Quality

Size Matters: Picking the Right Size of Piping System Components. April 13, 2017

CITY OF MILTON PIERCE/KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON WATER SYSTEM PLAN

WATER MAIN EXTENSION DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

Online Water Quality Monitoring Systems

Troubleshooting Piping Systems

Domestic Water Use and Piped Water Supply (PWS)

Coming and Going An Overview of Infrastructure Common to Water Distribution and Wastewater Collection Systems

La modellazione per la gestione efficiente della rete idrica Pedro Pina

BMPs for the Control of Disinfection By-Products

PipelineNet: A GIS Based Water Quality Model for Distribution Systems

EPA / WERF/ WaterRF Framework

Presentation Summary. What, Why, and How. Building the Model. Facility Data Acquisition. Model Calibration. Real World Applications/Case Studies

An Innovative Approach to DMA. October 2015

MEETING MINUTES VILLAGE OF HOOSICK FALLS/TOWN OF HOOSICK ENGINEERING REPORTS FOR: WATER EXPANSION SEWER EXPANSION

Valve Nest Filter with Time Clock Control Installation and Operation Manual

Case Studies to Identify Occurrence, Accuracy and Causes of Reverse Flow Using Meter Systems

Developing Mesopolis A Virtual City for Research in Water Distribution Systems and Interdependent Infrastructures

Dynamic Hydraulic Modeling of a Wastewater Treatment Plant. City of Fort Worth Case Study

The Impact of Pressure Management Techniques on the Water Age in an Urban Pipe Network The Case of Kos City Network

City of Yuba City. Yuba City Update to Water Demand and Infrastructure System Evaluation. Technical Memorandum

DUBAI ELECTRICITY AND WATER AUTHORITY GUIDELINES FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS UPDATE

Woodbury - Aurora Metro Station

MOE Guidelines on Surge/Transients


AUGUST 30, 2016 DRAFT WATER SYSTEM PLAN TEXT AND TABLES BYWATER BAY WATER SYSTEM WITHOUT SHINE PLAT

CHAPTER 5 SEWAGE PUMPS AND LIFT STATIONS

Pumps and Pumping Stations

Using Hydraulic Modeling to Determine Viable Emergency Water Supply Options for the City Of San Francisco s Largest Reservoir and Pressure Zone

CHAPTER 4 MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA

Simulation of Existing Water Distribution Network by using EPANET: A Case Study of Surat City

Evaluating Water Quality from Source to Tap: Using Hydraulic Modeling, Statistical Analysis and Other Tools to Improve Water Quality

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

STUDY OF WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK USING EPANET

The rest of this document describes the BBLAWN competition rules and framework.

South Coast Water District 2017 Master Plan Updates

The Study on Water Supply System for Siem Reap Region in Cambodia Main Report Chapter 5

Irrigation Tech II HYDRAULIC TROUBLESHOOTING

Review & Design of the Apia Pressure Sewer System

Transcription:

DRINKING WATER ENERGY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP SERIES TAKING ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE NEXT LEVEL: Hydraulic Modeling and System Optimization Steven Jones, M.S., P.E. September 4, 2013

What is a Water System Hydraulic Model? A digital (virtual) representation of a water distribution system in computer software that simulates hydraulic and water quality behavior within the pressurized pipe network.

Hydraulic model components: Pipes Pipe Junctions (Nodes) Pumps Valves (PRVs, etc.) Storage Tanks Reservoirs

Tank Reservoir Pump Pipe Valve Node

Data needed for pipes: Diameter Length Roughness (based on material and age)

Data needed for nodes: Elevation Water Demand

Data needed for valves: Type Position (open/closed) Setting (pressure, flow)

Data needed for pumps: Pump Curve Power Data Status (open/closed)

Data needed for wells: Pump Curve Power Diameter Pump Depth Ground water level during pumping

Data needed for tanks: Dimensions (Volume) Overflow elevation Floor drain elevation Water surface elevation

Data needed for reservoirs: Water surface elevation

Hydraulic computer models utilize userspecified input parameters to calculate: The water flow direction and flow rate in each pipe Operating pressure at each node Elevation of the water in each tank Concentration of a chemical or compound throughout the network Power used at each pump

STEADY-STATE vs. EXTENDED PERIOD

Water Distribution System Modeling Steady-State Represents a snapshot in time used to determine system behavior under static conditions Extended-Period Represents system behavior over a period of time used to model tanks filling and draining, pressures and flows rates changing throughout the system in response to varying demands

Control Settings PRV settings Booster settings Tank level controls

Extended-Period Water Model

Level (feet) Extended-Period Water Model TANK LEVEL 16 14 12 10 8 6 SCADA System Model 4 2 0 12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 12:00 AM

Flow (gpm) Extended-Period Water Model Well Flow 3000 2500 2000 1500 SCADA Systeml Model 1000 500 0 12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 12:00 AM

WATER SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION

Energy consumption in most Water systems could be reduced by at least 25 percent through cost-effective efficiency actions - Alliance to Save Energy

Pumping water is often the largest share of a public entity s energy costs.

Much of the focus to date has been on improving equipment efficiencies, which is only a small portion of the potential energy savings in water systems. We have found many systems have significant opportunities to improve the efficiency of how a water system is operated overall.

In addition to energy inefficiencies, we have found many drinking water systems have inefficiencies in: Design Operation Performance Water Quality Water Use

Common Untapped Water System Performance and Energy Efficiency Measures Use an extended period model to better understand how the system operates Understand how control settings affect system efficiency More efficient use of equalization storage Meet peak demand without over-using sources Detect and prevent pumping in circles

Common Untapped Water System Performance and Energy Efficiency Measures (continued) Understand that system over-design can hurt efficiency Efficient vs. inefficient system layouts Use lowest cost water first Improve pressure management Detect inefficient pumps and motors Use the best electricity rate schedule for the application

Common Untapped Water System Performance and Energy Efficiency Measures (continued) Detect and repair water leaks Understand that poor maintenance and aging infrastructure robs the system of efficiency Identify and resolve water quality issues Understand how metering and rate schedules affect water use Understand how water conservation measures affect performance and efficiency

Better Understand Your System with an Extended Period Model See where water goes, how pressure fluctuates, velocity changes, pumps turning on and off, and tanks emptying and filling Understand the consequences of control and setting changes A tool to help operators, engineers, and managers understand each other

Better Understand Your System with an Extended Period Model System inventory and mapping Operator training and system operation guide Emergency response and trouble shooting tool Customer support

Control Settings PRV settings Booster settings Tank level controls

Efficient use of Storage Use equalization storage to meet peak demands instead of using sources Use storage as a battery pump water to the storage tank using an off peak electricity rate Identify where emergency and fire suppression storage levels are in tanks At the appropriate time, empty space in the tank can be as important as a full tank

Level Fluctuation at a Tank

FLOW (gpm) 12:00:00 AM 10:00:00 PM 8:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 2:00:00 PM 12:00:00 PM 10:00:00 AM 8:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 4:00:00 AM 2:00:00 AM 12:00:00 AM Demand Flow Source Flow 60,000 50,000 Peak Instantaneous = 49,500 gpm 40,000 Peak Day Average = 32,500 gpm 30,000 20,000 10,000 Total Peak Day Volume = 46.8 MG Volume above Peak Day = 6.9 MG Volume from Storage = 2.7 0 TIME

FLOW (gpm) PEAK MONTH SOURCE FLOWS 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DAY

FLOW (gpm) Keep Sources Constant It is generally more expensive to meet peak demand with sources Keep sources constant at highest operating efficiency Use flow control valves on wholesale connections to maximize the use of equalization storage and avoid peaking charges 8000 7000 6000 5000 PEAK MONTH SOURCE FLOWS 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DAY

Eliminate Re-pumping of Water Use a water model to predict how much water should be pumped Use the model to trace where the pumped water is going to see if water is being re-pumped Determine if water is recirculating or leaking within the pump station through a PRV, relief valve, or surge protection device

Overdesign can hurt efficiency A water model allows you to better visualize how a design will meet project and system wide goals Helps to refine the design criteria for increased efficiency Oversized pump stations are not energy efficient Oversized pipelines and storage tanks can have slow recirculation, increasing water quality issues Design to accommodate increasing demand without sacrificing efficiency

Efficient Pump Station Design

Inefficient System Layout Unusable equalization storage because of tank location or elevation Inadequate transmission capacity Unnecessary relief of source water pressure Too much source and storage in the upper pressure zone with a majority of the demand in the lower pressure zone

Use Lowest Cost Water First Determine the total unit cost of using each source Know the limitations of each source (water rights, capacity, water quality) Facility Name Pumping Capacity (gpm) Pumping Cost (cost per ac-ft) Well A 1,000 $22.04 Booster #1 3,000 $36.09 Well B 3,000 $42.34 Pump Station 1,400 $45.71 Well C 1,600 $72.31 Well D 1,500 $129.85

Use Lowest Cost Water First Determine the total unit cost of using each source Know the limitations of each source (water rights, capacity, water quality) Understand the additional cost of using more than one source or pump station at once. Have prioritized source operation plans that maximize the use of lower cost water

Use Lowest Cost Water First Automate the prioritized operation plans as much as possible Use proper PRV settings and control settings that don t allow high cost water to be used over lower cost water Keep higher cost water where it is needed Maximize the use of lower cost water in the areas of the system where it can be used

Trace Movement of Water

Improve Pressure Management Higher pressures increase the potential for water loss, system failures and higher water use

Improve Pressure Management Higher pressures increase the potential for water loss, system failures and higher water use Identify whether a low pressure is caused by elevation or high velocity Identify large pressure fluctuations (large pressure fluctuations = inefficiencies Identify the cause of high velocities (inadequate transmission capacity, system imbalance)

Visualize Pressure and Velocity Results

Pressure Fluctuation at a Connection

Inefficient Pumps and Motors Use a water model to predict how much energy pumps should be using Track the performance and energy use of pumps and motors over time

Use the Cheapest Rate Schedule Understand the electricity rate schedules available Use the water model to identify which rate options and system operation schedules are the most feasible Use the water model to calculate electricity costs using the possible rate options and operation schedules and select the best rate schedule

Eliminate Water Loss Use the model to develop the most efficient flushing program Determine how much water loss the system has Use pressure tests, SCADA and meter data during the lowest demand period to calibrate a water leakage model Model actual metered demand data and source flows during the lowest demand period Use emitter coefficients to predict water leakage hot spots in the system

Poor Maintenance Tuberculation in old cast iron pipe can dramatically decrease capacity and increase head loss

Poor Maintenance Tuberculation in old cast iron pipe can dramatically decrease capacity and increase head loss Leaks in old pipes, valves, and facilities Worn pumps and motors Malfunctioning PRVs and relief valves Malfunctioning SCADA and controls

Water Quality Issues A water model can simulate water quality in your system Understand the fate of chlorine and the concentration of fluoride in your system and increase efficiency Help you understand water age and contaminant concentration Track the location of a contaminant source Predict how source mixing can improve water quality

Understanding Water Quality Patterns

Common Barriers to Improving Drinking Water System Efficiency Lack of Awareness. People will not make changes towards efficiency unless they are aware of the cost-benefit arguments for doing so. This is especially true in the case of applying energy efficiency to water supply, since those who operate day to day in the water sector are not accustomed to focusing on energy.

Common Barriers to Improving Drinking Water System Efficiency Risk. Deviating from the usual routine is associated with risk, real or perceived, such as added burden on staff or financial risk. Fear of change has a rational basis and breaking through it requires that the fears be addressed and that the benefits of change clearly outweigh risks.

Common Barriers to Improving Drinking Water System Efficiency Change May Imply a Problem with the Status Quo. It is not uncommon for staff to be resistant to new ideas and procedures due to a feeling that suggestions for change imply criticism of their performance and ability.

Common Barriers to Improving Drinking Water System Efficiency Cost. Understanding energy and water inefficiency in a water system costs money that many find hard to budget for. How can a water system afford not to get rid of inefficiency? Many untapped water system efficiency measures cost little if anything to implement and the payback is ongoing. Measures that require upfront capital costs generally have short payback periods.

IN SUMMARY 1. 1 Water systems have significant untapped efficiency improvement potential 2. We have identified solutions to many common inefficiencies found in water systems 3. An extended period water model is a valuable tool to improve system performance and energy efficiency