Quil Ceda Creek Casino Project Archaeological Monitoring and Treatment Plan

Similar documents
PLAN AND PROCEDURES FOR THE UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES AND HUMAN SKELETAL REMAINS

The SMA and Archaeological/Cultural Resources

Unanticipated Discoveries Plan EXHIBIT J UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERIES PLAN FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES INCLUDING HUMAN REMAINS

ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES IN KING COUNTY

Research Design for Archaeological Fieldwork Draft 1

APPENDIX M PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE

TEL FAX

Appendix G Draft Memorandum of Agreement

Archaeological Investigations Northwest, Inc.

Summary of Phase I Archaeological Survey for the NICTD Double Track NWI, Gary, IN, to Michigan City, IN

Orange County Central Utility Facility Upgrade IP

6. The following paragraphs provide further interim guidance where the ACHP regulations are not specific to the Corps Regulatory Program:

Chapter 16 Historic and Cultural Resources

Googong Township water cycle project: Stage A - Network (west)

ATTACHMENT D -1 SUMMARY OF PHMC COORDINATION

4.4 Cultural Resources

EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES

Phase I/II Archaeological Survey

Memorandum. To: From: Date: July 25, 2018

5.3 CULTURAL RESOURCES

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE

ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN:

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE COVEL GARDENS LANDFILL AREA IN SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. Daniel R. Potter

Second Avenue Subway Draft Programmatic Agreement WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS

Lauren Erickson, Hearing Examiner, City of Port Angeles. Allyson Brekke, AICP, Planning Manager, Community and Economic Development

Chapter 5 Regulatory Coordination and Compliance

RESOLUTION NO

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE BELL-MILAM-FALLS WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN MILAM COUNTY, TEXAS

ARCHAEOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS OVERVIEW

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

New Jersey Pennsylvania Lackawanna Cut-Off Passenger Rail Service Restoration Environmental Assessment. Appendix B

Appendix G: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Mary Morse Shaw TR et el. (PLN020567

VALLEY LATERAL PROJECT. RESOURCE REPORT 4 Cultural Resources. FERC Docket No. CP

WHEREAS, the Boston Landmarks Commission (BLC) has participated in the consultation and has been invited to concur in the Agreement; and

MMRP for Metro Red/Purple Line Core Capacity Improvements Project

The source of information used in this report is based on the database of published and unpublished information which is available for the area.

Enacted in 1970 by the California legislature, the

ARCHAEOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS

Appendix B Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL GUIDELINES

DECISION MEMO OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ODOT) SAND SHED CINDER PIT EXPLORATION PROJECT

Memo. To: Annette Nesse, Chief Operations Officer. From: Subject: Leanne Jenkins, Planning Director TEPA , Sophus-Corriea Loop Road

MITIGATION MEASURES TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT AND AGREED TO BY THE PROJECT SPONSOR AND ALL SUBSEQUENT PROPERTY OWNERS AND PERMITEES FOR THE

NISQUALLY RED WIND CASINO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS / PROPOSAL FOR MASTER PLANNING SERVICES

STAFF REPORT TOMMER SHORT TERM MINERAL EXTRACTION

MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING & BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT st AVENUE MARINA, CA (831) FAX: (831)

MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PLAN

4.11 CULTURAL RESOURCES

STAFF REPORT. Planning Commission. Anjanette Simon, Associate Planner

The current note, approved by the County Commission on August 11, 2015 (INSTR # ) reads as follows:

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. July 14, 2015

ANTIQUITIES PERMIT APPLICATION FORM ARCHEOLOGY

California Environmental Quality Act Part 1: CEQA Basics

FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY S CULTURAL RESOURCE RESPONSIBILITIES

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION

Appendix K Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Sterling Highway Milepost 45 to 60 Project

Article 7. COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES

Preliminary Decision Memo 2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake

Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Lawrence University Garden, Appleton, Wisconsin

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE. March 19, Leake Avenue Post Office Box 4313 New Orleans, Louisiana Baton Rouge, Louisiana

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Stafford Fire Salvage and Restoration Project Heritage Report. South Fork Management Unit Shasta-Trinity National Forest

STAFF REPORT WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION COVERED SHELTERS AND BIKE RACKS

Snohomish County Council

CEQA and its Role in Historic Preservation. Darcy Kremin, AICP Bay Area Environmental Practice Leader Michael Baker International, Oakland, CA

CEMVR-OD-P WETLAND COMPENSATORY MITIGATION BANK PROPOSAL

Decision Memo. Administrative Site Disposal Old Agness Guard Station Compound

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN

AVOIDANCE & MINIMIZATION MEASURES: NO ADVERSE EFFECT

Re: Dawson Geophysical Company s Proposed San Rafael Saddle 3-D Geophysical Exploration Project, Emery County, Utah.

DRAFT. WHEREAS, FHWA, USMC, NPS, DDOT, DPR, DCSHPO and CSX are hereafter referred to as the Signatories to this MOA; and

ANALYSIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT for Brickell Flatiron located at approximately 1001, 1015, 1023, 1101 and 1121 South Miami Avenue

Code of Conduct for the Treatment of Human Remains

MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PLAN

Archaeological Monitoring along the STH 57 Project Corridor, WisDOT Project Numbers /

Monitoring Report No. 45

Grading & Excavation Information Application & Checklist

PROSPECTUS CAPPELL C LOGGING UNIT YUROK INDIAN LANDS

BEFORE THE DIRECTOR CITY OF TACOMA

Environmental Assessment House, West Malheur and Wolf Mountain Allotments Heritage 201

Tree Protection Policy

5 OTHER CEQA SECTIONS

STATE OF OREGON CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY COVER

STAFF REPORT F.P. & L. Welleby Substation 059-MP-83

Carpinteria Valley Water District Carpinteria Advanced Purification Project

SPECIAL PROVISIONS WATERWAY PERMITS CONDITIONS PID: Date: 3/8/18 C-R-S: UNI-TR

SECTION EARTHWORK; EXCAVATION, FILLING AND GRADING. A. Excavating soil and other material for surface improvements.

Remediation Plan. for. Creek County Landfill Site. E/2 SE NW 28-18N-12E Creek County, OK

Preliminary Decision Memo 2017 BPA Utility Corridor Maintenance and Danger Tree Project

Proposed Boykins Substation Microwave Tower May 31, 2017

WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT

ABEL UNDERGROUND MINE: ABORIGINAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE PLANNING AREA 6 NORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Appendix A: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan

September 12, Ms. Lisa Plowman Planning Manager RRM Design 10 East Figueroa Street, Suite 1. Santa Barbara, CA 93101

Decision Memo for Juniper Ridge Opal Mine

Transcription:

Quil Ceda Creek Casino Project Archaeological Monitoring and Treatment Plan Prepared for: The Tulalip Tribes 8802 27th Avenue NE Tulalip, Washington 98271 Prepared by: Dave Iversen, M.A., RPA ASM Affiliates, Inc. 26231 72nd Ave. NW, Suite 201 Stanwood, Washington 98292 ASM PN 27410.00 February 2018

Chapter TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION... 1 PREVIOUS CULTURAL RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS... 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING METHODS... 3 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AWARENESS... 3 TREATMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES... 3 MONITORING PLAN SUMMARY... 5 UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY PLAN... 6 INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES PROTOCOL... 6 INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF HUMAN REMAINS... 6 QCCC PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION... 7 REFERENCES... 8 APPENDIX A... 9 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Quil Ceda Creek Casino project location.... 2 QCCC Monitoring and Treatment Plan i

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Archaeological Monitoring and Treatment Plan is to establish archaeological resources monitoring and inadvertent discovery protocols to be used during ground-disturbing construction associated with the Quil Ceda Creek Casino (QCCC) Project on the Tulalip Indian Reservation in Snohomish County, Washington. It includes sections on archaeological monitoring methods, a monitoring plan summary, and a plan for dealing with unanticipated discoveries, in addition to pertinent contact information. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION The Tulalip Tribe envisions the new QCCC Project to be an exciting addition to the overall Quil Ceda development area. The project area is located in Sections 29 and 32 of Township 30 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Base and Meridian (Figure 1). The new casino will replace the existing facility on an adjacent undeveloped site. The casino project will be located on a 12-acre site to the south of the existing Quil Ceda Creek Casino (Appendix A). The current site is being occupied by the Judicial Center which is scheduled for demolition. The proposed project includes the following: construction of approximately 110,000 foot2 (ft.) of casino space including but not limited to gaming floor; back of house areas; employee dining; storage; loading dock; bars and restaurants; signage; emergency generator; raised casino floor; high quality smoke evacuation system; and other amenities. This new facility is expected to have 1,250 slot machine positions, with the ability to expand to 1,500; 17 table games; and two casino bars. In addition, a casual dining restaurant, two fast food venues, a coffee shop, and an entertainment lounge will also be included in the program. The proposed project entails site development of approximately 12 to 14 acres of land including a 1,200-stall parking garage, any site utilities (possible lift station), and 700 surface parking stalls. PREVIOUS CULTURAL RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS ASM Affiliates, Inc. (ASM) previously conducted a cultural resources assessment associated with the current QCCC Project (Iversen and Steingraber 2016). ASM identified no cultural resources within the project area as a result of the assessment. However, ASM was unable to conduct subsurface investigations in most of the project area s western and northern portions due to existing structures, asphalt pavement, and compact gravel fill. Although the results of the investigation were negative for archaeological resources, there is still a potential for buried cultural resources within the project area based on its location near the Snohomish River Estuary and Quilceda Creek, ethnographic documentation of land use in the project vicinity including village sites along Quilceda Creek, the proximity of previously recorded archaeological sites on similar landforms, and the previous identification of a precontact isolated artifact immediately east of the project area. Cultural resources associated with historic and/or precontact utilization of the project area could be present below fill materials associated with the modern development of the parcel. Additionally, precontact cultural resources could be buried deeply within alluvial deposits in the project area based on the estimated progradation of the Snohomish River Estuary. Based on the potential for encountering archaeological resources, ASM recommended that a professional archaeologist monitor all ground-disturbing activity associated within the QCCC Project. QCCC Monitoring and Treatment Plan 1

Figure 1. 2 Quil Ceda Creek Casino project location. ASM Affiliates, Inc.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING METHODS ASM will provide a professional archaeologist will be on site during construction excavation associated with the project. The on-site archaeological monitor will observe ground disturbances, examining excavation openings and backdirt from excavations for evidence of cultural resource materials while maintaining a safe distance from construction equipment. The monitor may request that construction activities be temporarily halted as necessary to allow photography and recovery of materials and data. Any backdirt may be screened at the discretion of the archaeological monitor. The archaeological monitor will be prepared with the basic equipment needed to perform site documentation, evaluation, and recovery of unanticipated discoveries. The archaeological monitor will follow all safety protocols required of personnel conducting construction activities. The archeological monitor will prepare daily field monitoring verification reports, noting observations, results, and actions taken, as appropriate, concerning the monitoring efforts. Digital photographs will be taken to record the construction activity as well as the character and provenience of any identified cultural resources. A technical report detailing the results of the archaeological monitoring will be completed after the conclusion of all construction excavation associated with the project. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AWARENESS Prior to major construction activities, the project archaeologist will provide sufficient information to the on-site superintendent regarding the laws governing archaeological material and a copy of this Monitoring and Treatment Plan. The project archaeologist will also provide a copy of the contact list and a brief training to the construction crew to familiarize them with potential resources and the Unanticipated Discovery Plan. During the archaeological meeting, the project archaeologist will ensure that the construction foreman and other employees working in the project area understand the roles and responsibilities of the archaeological monitor, as well as the procedures to be followed in the event of an inadvertent discovery when the monitor is not on site. TREATMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES If pre-contact or historic-period archaeological materials and/or features are encountered during the course of monitoring activities, all work within at least 30 ft. (10 m) of the find will halt, and the cultural resources representative of the Tulalip Tribes and the QCCC owners representative will be contacted immediately. The treatment of the archaeological materials and their potential National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility will be determined through coordination with Tribe. If avoidance of the resource is not feasible under project constraints, additional mitigation, including but not limited to NRHP-eligibility test excavations and/or data recovery excavations, may be required. A supplemental treatment plan may be required if potentially NRHP-eligible pre-contact cultural resources are encountered and cannot be avoided. The archaeological monitor will ensure that an area large enough to protect the integrity of the resource is avoided by construction excavation until the appropriate treatment measures are met. Construction excavation will continue in the area once the treatment of the resource has been completed. Potential NRHPeligible cultural resources that could be encountered include but are not limited to: Intact shell midden deposits; Lithic concentrations and/or reduction sites; Fire modified rock (FMR) hearth features Historic period structural remains, intact refuse deposits, and/or privy features; Human remains. QCCC Monitoring and Treatment Plan 3

If cultural resources that are not eligible for the NRHP are encountered (e.g., low-density disturbed/displaced shell midden deposits; isolated pre-contact lithic artifacts; isolated historic-period bottles) construction will halt temporarily (less than 30 minutes) in the immediate vicinity (30 ft.) so that the archaeologist can document the find. Photographs, measurements, and notes will be taken to document the material. Construction will then continue in the area with an archaeological monitor present to ensure no additional cultural resources are encountered. The results of the documentation will be recorded on appropriate Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) Inventory Forms and included with a report detailing the results of monitoring. Cultural resources that would not likely be eligible for the NRHP and could be encountered include but are not limited to: Low-density disturbed/displaced shell midden deposits; Isolated pre-contact lithic artifacts; Isolated historic-period bottles, wooden irrigation pipes, and/or agricultural tools. 4 ASM Affiliates, Inc.

MONITORING PLAN SUMMARY Monitoring Plan Summary An ASM archaeological monitor will be on-site during ground-disturbing activity. The archaeological monitor may request that construction activities be halted temporarily as necessary to allow photography and recovery of materials and data. The archaeological monitor will prepare daily field monitoring verification reports, noting observations, results, and actions taken, as appropriate, concerning the monitoring efforts. Digital photographs will be taken to record the construction activity as well as the character and provenience of any identified cultural resources. If archaeological materials and/or features are encountered during the course of monitoring activities, all work in the immediate vicinity (30 ft.) of the find will halt, and the cultural resources representative of the Tulalip Tribes and the QCCC owners representative will be contacted immediately. The treatment of the archaeological materials will be determined at that time. Construction excavation will continue in the area once treatment of the resource has been completed. ASM will submit a technical report detailing the results of the archaeological monitoring after fieldwork completion. If potential human remains are encountered during the project, all work in the area will halt and the protocols described in the following section will be implemented. QCCC Monitoring and Treatment Plan 5

UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY PLAN The following sections details the procedures to be followed if construction activities associated with the QCCC Project inadvertently encounter cultural resources and/or human remains. INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES PROTOCOL Prior to commencement of project activities, construction personnel will be prepared for the possibility of encountering prehistoric and/or historic archaeological materials during ground-disturbing activities. In the event that construction activities associated with the project encounter cultural resources that are potentially eligible for the NRHP (e.g. intact shell midden deposits, lithic reduction sites, FMR hearth features, historic period refuse deposits and/or privy features, human remains), including archaeological artifacts, features, and/or sites, all work in the immediate vicinity will halt, and ASM will coordinate the treatment of the materials with the cultural resources representative of the Tulalip Tribes. Work shall not proceed in the area of discovery until notification to proceed is granted by the Tribe. Compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to archaeological resources is required. If cultural resources that are not eligible for the NRHP are encountered (e.g., low-density disturbed/displaced shell midden deposits; isolated pre-contact lithic artifacts; isolated historic-period bottles or agricultural tools) construction will halt temporarily (less than 30 minutes) in the immediate vicinity (30 ft.) so that the archaeologist can document the find. Photographs, measurements, and notes will be taken to document material. Construction will then continue in the area with an archaeological monitor present to ensure no additional cultural resources are encountered. The results of the documentation will be recorded on appropriate DAHP Inventory Forms and included with a report detailing the results of the monitoring. INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF HUMAN REMAINS If human remains are encountered during the project, ASM will immediately contact the Snohomish County Medical Examiner, the Snohomish County Sheriff, the cultural resources representative of the Tulalip Tribes, the QCCC owners representative, and the DAHP State Physical Anthropologist, and the following protocol will be applied: All persons who know of the existence and location of human remains must, by law, notify the county medical examiner and local law enforcement. This will be done in the most expeditious manner possible (RCW 27.44; 68.50; 68.60). Any person engaging in ground-disturbing activities that encounter skeletal human remains will cease all activity that may cause further disturbance to the remains, make a reasonable effort to protect the area from further disturbance, and report the presence and location of those remains to the medical examiner and local law enforcement (RCW 27.44; 68.50;68.60). The county medical examiner will assume jurisdiction over the human skeletal remains and make a determination of whether those remains are forensic or non-forensic (RCW 27.44; 68.50; 68.60). If the county medical examiner determines the remains are non-forensic, then the DAHP will take jurisdiction over the remains (RCW27.44; 68.50; 68.60). The State Physical Anthropologist will make a determination of whether the remains are Indian or Non-Indian and report that finding to the affected parties (RCW 27.44, 68.50; 68.60). 6 ASM Affiliates, Inc.

QCCC PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION Name Organization Title Email Phone# Richard Young Tulalip Tribes Cultural Resources ryoung@tulaliptribes-nsn.gov (360) 716-2652 Guy Tasa DAHP State Physical Anthropologist guy.tasa@dahp.wa.gov (360) 586-3534 Daniel Selove Snohomish County Chief Medical Examiner contact.medadmin@snoco.org (425) 438-6200 Snohomish County Sheriff s Department contact.sheriff@snoco.org (425) 388-3393 Kurt Peterson KPMC Ventures QCCC Owners Representative kpmcllc@comcast.net (206) 245-7848 Jon Dalton Wright Hotel Development Superintendent jon@wrighthd.com (503) 748-9251 Alan Fenrich Tribal Designs Superintendent alan@tribaldesignsinc.com (425) 622-8510 Dave Iversen ASM Affiliates, Inc. Archaeologist diversen@asmaffiliates.com (360) 631-9685 QCCC Monitoring and Treatment Plan 7

REFERENCES Iversen, Dave, and Aubrey Steingraber 2016 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Quil Ceda Creek Casino Project, Tulalip Indian Reservation, Snohomish County, Washington. Report on file at the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. 8 ASM Affiliates, Inc.

APPENDIX A QCCC Site Plan QCCC Monitoring and Treatment Plan