OPVC FINAL PROJECT REPORT: 2016 PROJECT YEAR: 1 of 1. Project Title: Tolerance of Carrots to Bicyclopyrone and Tolpyralate, 2016

Similar documents
OPVC Project Number: Project title: Improving the Utility of Upbeet (Triflsulfuron) Herbicide in Table Beets

Assessing Weed Control Options in a Commercial Conifer Nursery

Title: Nutsedge control in sweet corn and other rotational crops

Cucurbit crop tolerance to fomesafen, 2009 Oregon State University, Horticulture Dept. Submitted by Ed Peachey

Cucumber No-Till Weed Management Study.

4/11/2010 (C4 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia. Palmer amaranth seed return as impacted by weed management program.

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

Authority MTZ: the fit for processing tomatoes

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATO. Joel Felix Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2009.

(21 08 CRRLL-21 Corn Herb Study Cadet Resource) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center

EVALUATION OF LAYBY HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS TO SEED CARROTS, Abstract. Introduction. Methods and Materials

PREEMERGENCE AND POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN FIELD CORN

MICRO-RATE HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS, DUAL II MAGNUM, AND BAS H FOR WEED CONTROL IN SUGAR BEETS

WEED MANAGEMENT IN CARROTS, RED BEETS, VINE CROPS, COLE CROPS, TOMATOES, PEPPERS AND SWEET CORN. Grant Number: CORD Reference #: CORD 9026

DEVELOPMENT OF HERBICIDE OPTIONS FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

EVALUATION OF DRIFT RETARDANTS (DRIFT CONTROL AGENTS) TWO-YEAR SUMMARY

DEVELOPMENT OF NEW HERBICIDE OPTIONS FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATO PRODUCTION

Rotational crop tolerance to soil residual herbicides previously applied to seedling Kentucky bluegrass under Columbia Basin production conditions

Weed Control with Outlook Combinations Combinations of Outlook with herbicides currently registered for use in potatoes were evaluated for

WEED CONTROL IN RED BEETS RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

Adjuvant Studies in Soybean

HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN SEEDLING ALFALFA IN CENTRAL OREGON

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Rattail fescue control in chemical fallow

Volume XII, Number 7 April 25, Metribuzin-Resistant Weeds in Potato Production Areas of the Columbia Basin. Rick Boydston, USDA-ARS, Prosser, WA

Effect of Linex Application Rate and Timing on Sweetpotato Katie Jennings NC State University

Influence of Different Herbicides on Weeds and Dry Beans at Scottsbluff, NE during the 2008 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

2010 Pepper Weed Control Richard Smith, Farm Advisor, University of California Cooperative Extension Monterey County

Conducted Under GEP (Y/N): Y Guideline Description: To Protocol

LATE SEASON WEED CONTROL IN SUGAR BEETS WITH POSTEMERGENCE APPLICATIONS OF FRONTIER HERBICIDE

TRIAL YEAR: 2016 (2 ND YR) STATE: AR TRACKING NUMBER: CROP: EDAMAME FRD: N. R. BURGOS/L. E. ESTORNINOS REASON FOR NEED: CROP SAFETY

WEED CONTROL IN PROCESSING VEGETABLES RESEARCH RESULTS 2012 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

Treatment Date June 3 June 27 Application Preemergence Postemergence

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat Mark Thorne, Drew Lyon and Tim Waters

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2009 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN COLLEGE FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

2014 Giant Ragweed Control with Diflexx Herbicide in Field Corn in Rochester, MN.

TITLE: Improving winter cover crop establishment in sweet corn production in the Willamette Valley.

Use of Residual Herbicides for Tough to Control Weeds in Snap Beans Final Report for 2012

SEEDLING ALFALFA WEED CONTROL TRIALS IN 1991 and Mylen Bohle, John Nuemeister, Jim Fitzsimmons, Juan Carlos Bielefeldt, Larry Burrill

California Pepper Commission Complete Annual Report, 2011

WEED CONTROL IN PROCESSING VEGETABLES RESEARCH RESULTS 2010 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

California Pepper Commission Annual Report, Title: Preemergence Weed Control Trials in Peppers

EVALUATION OF PYROXASULFONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT- SEEDED ONION

WEED CONTROL IN PROCESSING VEGETABLES RESEARCH RESULTS 2009 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

Snap Bean Weed Control in Mid-Atlantic States

HERBICIDE COMBINATIONS AND ADJUVANTS FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT SUGAR BEET

Evaluation of Postemergence Herbicides for Melon Weed Control

Treatment Date June 3 June 28 July 8 July 19 July 29

Influence of rainfall amount, rainfall timing, organic matter, and soil ph on sulfentrazone dry pea injury and yield (2004)

2016 Spinach Weed Control Evaluations Summary: Methods: Trial No. 1. Trial No. 2. Trial No. 3. Practices for all three trials: Results: Trial No. 1.

where as pyroxasulfone at lbai/a and Dual at 1.2 lbai/a failed to provide acceptable control (63% and 33% respectively)

Evaluation of the "Fit" of Amber and Rave in Tall Fescue Pastures

R. Allen Straw, SW VA AREC, VPI Farm Rd., Glade Spring, VA 24340,

Vernon Center Technical Report # prepared by. Brian Olson John Sij Todd Baughman

EFFECT OF FUSILADE 2000 ON STORAGE AND SEED PERFORMANCE OF RUSSET BURBANK AND NORGOLD POTATOES. Steven R. James '

Weed control updates Ed Peachey, Horticulture OSU. What s up in beets Swiss chard Green onions Rhubarb Squash and pumpkins Mechanical innovations

2016 Demonstration of the herbicide components in dicamba soybean, PRE plus POST and POST only applied at 3 and 6 inch weed at Rochester, MN.

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel

WEED CONTROL AND CROP RESPONSE WITH HERBICIDES APPLIED IN FIELD CORN

WEED CONTROL IN ONION WITH POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES

EVALUATION OF PREEMERGENCE AND POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS ON SUGAR BEETS, Marvin Butler. Abstract

Trial: 2002-maxyield A Comparison of Corn Herbicide/Insecticide Programs Bruce Potter, Jodie Getting University of Minnesota SWROC

Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 13/May/2003. Pest Description Pest 1 Type: W Code: ABUTH Abutilon theophrasti Common Name: Velvetleaf

WEED CONTROL IN PUMPKINS & SQUASH RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

WASHINGTON STATE COMMISSION ON PESTICIDE REGISTRATION FINAL PROJECT REPORT

Field Reference Guide

Weed Control in Potatoes. Andy Robinson Extension Agronomist Potatoes NDSU/U of M

1. OPVC RESEARCH REPORT COVER PAGE

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2011 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, UNIV. GUELPH, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

THE EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON HERBICIDE EFFICACY AND OAT YIELD I

Kixor herbicide: a potentially new sweet corn herbicide (2010 final research report)

Weed Management Research in Alfalfa Seed Production. Workgroup. UCD Alfalfa. Rick Boydston USDA-ARS Prosser, WA

Weed Management Update: Vegetable Crops. Jed Colquhoun and Dan Heider University of Wisconsin

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Envoke Weed Control/Crop Tolerance Test

Weed Management Components. Crop Health Rapid canopy cover will reduce weed growth. Tips for Successful Weed Control. Steve Weller Purdue University

Flue-cured Tobacco Layby Herbicide Evaluation

COMPARISON OF CALENDAR DAYS AND GROWING DEGREE-DAYS FOR SCHEDULING HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS IN SUGAR BEET

Kansas State University Field Pansy Control In No-Till Fields Going To Corn

Annual Weed Control in Furrow-Irrigated Mint

SUPPLEMENTAL LABELING

1/17/2010 (Veg27 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 6 University of Georgia Weed and pepper response to a potentially new fumigant.

SUNFLOWERS INTRODUCTION

Comparison of "Full Load" Glyphosate Formulations in Roundup Ready Soybean - Waterhemp.

Rescue N Applications for Corn: Yield Response, Leaf Burn, and Yield Loss Progress Report for 2003

Onion Weed Control Trials 2006 University of California Cooperative Extension 420 South Wilson Way Stockton, California

Onion Weed Control Trials 2006 University of California Cooperative Extension 420 South Wilson Way Stockton, California

Research report to the. Agricultural Research Foundation. and the. Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission 2005

No significant differences in corn stand between treatments were determined. No PRE applied treatment caused corn injury when observed on May 29,

CONCLUSIONS

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Seeded Cover Crops in Sugarbeet

Previous Crops Previous Pesticides Year 1. soybean various 2002

COTTON HERBICIDE SUGGESTIONS Read and follow all label directions before product use. Products with Residual Control Highlighted in Yellow

DOES GLYPHOSATE PLUS STAPLE OR ENVOKE APPLIED TOPICALLY TO ROUNDUP READY COTTON IMPACT FRUIT SET OR SEED YIELD?

MICRO-RATE HERBICIDE PROGRAMS FOR WEED CONTROL IN SUGAR BEETS

Evaluation of Command Tank Mixes for Broadleaf Weed Control in Pumpkins, R. Allen Straw and M. Angela Harrison. Interpretative Summary

Table 1. Application timing, plant stages, environmental conditions in Date 5/4 5/24 6/2 6/17 Treatment Temperature (F) Relative Humidity (%)

GRAIN SORGHUM. Preemergence

EVALUATION OF SUSTAIN ADJUVANT FOR IMPROVED HERBICIDE WEED EFFICACY IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Transcription:

OPVC FINAL PROJECT REPORT: 2016 PROJECT YEAR: 1 of 1 1. OPVC REPORT COVER PAGE (maximum 2 pages) Project Title: Tolerance of Carrots to Bicyclopyrone and Tolpyralate, 2016 PI: Ed Peachey Co-PI: Tim Waters Organization: OSU Organization: WSU Telephone: 541-740-6712 Telephone: 509-545-3511 Email: ed.peachey@oregonstate.edu Email: twaters@wsu.edu Address: Horticulture Department Address: 404 W. Clark ALS 4017 Pasco, WA 99301 Corvallis, OR, 97330 Total Project Request (all years): Year 1: 5,280 Year 2: Year 3: Other funding sources: none 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (ABSTRACT): Experiments in Corvallis, OR and Pasco, WA evaluated the potential of bicyclopyrone, tolpyralate, halosulfuron and EPTC for weed control in carrots. Bicyclopyrone and tolpyralate significantly reduced plant stand, injured carrots, and reduced yield at all three rates. Only bicyclopyrone at 0.875 oz/a and tolpyralate at 1 oz/a provided yield within range of linuron, prometryn, and EPTC treatments. The prometryn treatment yielded the most carrots, followed closely by linuron and EPTC. Halosulfuron killed all carrots. Weed control with bicyclopyrone and tolpyralate was similar when comparing within treatments with equal carrot injury. A possible exception was that tolpyralate may have controlled crabgrass better than bicyclopyrone. Prometryn control of hairy nightshade lasted longer than linuron.

3. FULL REPORT 3a. BACKGROUND Tolpyralate and bicyclopyrone are two herbicides with potential use for weed control in carrots grown for processing in Oregon. Tolpyralate is manufactured by ISK and distributed by Summit Ag. Bicyclopyrone is in the premix of Acuron (Syngenta) labeled for corn, but there are no other registrations for bicyclopyrone in other crops at this time. Observations from a screening trial in fresh market vegetables in 2015 indicated potential for both of these products to make important contributions to weed control in the future. IR-4 prioritized this project in September, 2015 and magnitude of residue and efficacy studies were carried out across the US this summer. 3.b OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate carrot crop safety and efficacy of bicyclopyrone and tolpyralate in Oregon and Columbia Basin conditions when applied to carrots for weed control. Secondary objectives were to evaluate potential use of Eptam in carrots. 3.c METHODS Corvallis The trial was located in Corvallis at the Vegetable Research Farm. Carrots (var. Nelson) were planted on 8-Jun at 420,000 seeds/a on 26 inch rows. Bicyclopyrone was applied both PRE and POST (2-3 leaf carrots) at 0.875, 1.75, and 3.5 oz/a. Tolpyralate was applied PRE and POST at 1/2, 1 and 2 oz/a (Table 1). Starter fertilizer (200 lbs/a of 12-10-10) was banded next to the row after seedlings had emerged on 23-Jun. Urea (50 lb N/A) was banded between rows on 15-Jul. Lorox was applied to the entire trial 10 days after the EPOST application to suppress/control weeds and reduce weed competition with the carrot crop. Treatments were replicated 4 times in a randomized complete block design. Carrots were harvested from 10 ft of row on 26-Aug. Roots from the replications for each treatment were composited into one sample before they were sent to a commercial facility in Pasco, WA for grading. Pasco Beds were formed with hilling shovels and a press wheel that were 10 inches tall and 44 inches from the center of one bed to the adjacent bed. Carrot (cv. Uppercut), were planted on 2-Jun, 2016 with a cone type seeder at a population of 750,000 seeds per acre at a depth of ¼ inch. Each plot was 44 inches wide and 20 feet long with four replications of each treatment in a randomized complete block design. The soil texture was a Quincy Loamy Fine Sand series. Post plant pre-emergent applications (PRE) were made on 3-Jun, 2016 with a CO2 backpack sprayer at an application rate of 20 gallons of water per acre. The sprayer boom had two 11002 XR flat fan nozzles and the pressure was set to 25 psi. The temperature in the morning of the 3rd was 56.4 degrees Fahrenheit. The relative humidity was 25% with wind speeds of 3.7 mph from the northeastern direction. The second application was made at the 2-3 leaf stage on 24- June with the same spray equipment as above. The temperature on the morning of the 24th was 56.9 degrees Fahrenheit. The relative humidity was 22% with wind speeds up to 8.4 mph coming from the west. Chemigation applications were also made using a system that mimics application via center pivot chemigation (CHEM1 and 2 applied 3 and 4-Jun, respectively). Those applications were made with 2,700 gallons of water per acre.

Efficacy and crop safety data were taken on 22 and 29-Jun by evaluating the damage to the crop and the percentage of the plot with adequate weed control. Weed species present included Russian thistle (Salsola kali), puncture vine (Tribulus terrestris), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), and lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Yield was evaluated by harvesting a 5 ft. section of each plot on 15-Sept and sent to a commercial facility for grading. 3.d RESULTS & DISCUSSION Corvallis (Tables 1 to 5 below) Bicyclopyrone and tolpyralate significantly reduced plant stand, injured carrots, and reduced yield at all three rates in this trial. Only bicyclopyrone at 0.875 oz/a and tolpyralate at 1 oz/a provided yield within range of linuron, prometryn, and EPTC treatments. The prometryn treatment yielded the most carrots, followed closely by Lorox and Eptam. Halosulfuron reduced carrot yield to near 0. The predominant weed species present was hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides/ physafolium), with a few pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), and common purslane (Portulaca oleracea) interspersed. Crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) emerged later than the other weeds and data is only presented at the 2 nd rating. Weed control with bicyclopyrone and tolpyralate was similar when comparing within treatments with equal carrot injury. A possible exception was that tolpyralate may have controlled crabgrass better than bicyclopyrone. Prometryn (Caparol) control of hairy nightshade lasted longer than linuron. Pasco (Tables 6 and 7) After the initial application, the only treatment that significantly improved weed control compared to the untreated check was the 1 oz per acre rate of halosulfuron (Sandea). All other treated plots reduced weed pressure, but not at a level that was statistically significant. The plots treated with halosulfuron at 1 oz/a and tolpyralate at 1 and 2 oz/a also had significant levels of crop damage compared to the untreated check. After the second application date, crop safety and efficacy was evaluated again. The only treatments that exhibited efficacy significantly better than the untreated check and crop safety that was significantly better than the untreated check was linuron (Lorox) 1 lb/a, prometryn (Caparol) 2 pt/a and the tank mix of linuron 1 lb/a and EPTC (Eptam) at 3.5 pint/a as preemergent applications. Many treatments offered improved weed control, but caused significant crop damage. Bicyclopyrone (1.75 and 3.5 oz/a), and tolpyralate (1and 2oz/A rates) showed the most significant decline in yield (tons/acre) compared to the untreated check. The preemergent application of Sandea killed most of the carrots in the plots and therefore there was no crop yield from those treatments.

Table 1. Site description and journal of activities, Corvallis. TRIAL LOCATION City Corvallis State/Prov OR Trial Reliability Good CROP DESCRIPTION Crop Carrots Planting Date 8-Jun Row spacing 26 in Seed Bed Small clods Variety Nelson (Bejo Seeds) Planting Method Gaspardo vacuum seeder Depth ½ to 3/4 in Spacing Within Row 0.58 in/seed (21/ft) SITE AND DESIGN Previous crop Sweet corn Plot Width 6.5 spray width, 9 foot plots Plot Length 20 Reps 4 Tillage Type Conv Study Design RCBD SOIL DESCRIPTION Soil type Chehalis silt loam Location Lat 44.5727; Lon: -123.2417 % OM 2.30; ph 7.1; CEC 21.75 JOURNAL Tuesday, June 7, 2016 Eptam applied then final tillage Wednesday, June 8, 2016 Planted 1/2 to 3/4 deep into cloddy soil, 21 seeds per foot Thursday, June 9, 2016 Applied PRE herbicides Friday, June 10, 2016 Irrigation 0.5 inch Thursday, June 23, 2016 Starter fertilizer banded next to row, 200 lbs 12-10-10/A Followed by irrigation Thursday, June 30, 2016 Wednesday, July 6, 2016 Thursday, July 7, 2016 Saturday, July 11, 2016 Saturday, July 16, 2016 Saturday, July 16, 2016 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Friday, August 26, 2016 Weed evaluation EPOST Additional 50 lbs N (urea) fertilizer applied between rows 3 hrs irrigation Plots cultivated between rows Eval scheduled for 2 WAT, but could not wait; weeds getting too big, needed to apply Lorox Applied Lorox to entire plot Crop safety evaluation Harvest from 10 ft of center row

Table 2. Herbicide application data for Corvallis. 1 2 3 4 Date June 7, 2016 June 9, 2016 July 6, 2016 July 16, 2016 Crop stage - After planting All 2 lf, a few 3 leaf Very small roots, plants up to 18 in tall Weeds and growth stage Predominately HNS - - <4 in. tall - Herbicide/treatment Eptam 2,3,4,8,9,10, 14,15, 17, 18 5,6,7,11,12,13 Lorox applied to entire plot 10 DA EPOST Application timing PPI PRE EPOST EPOST LOROX Start/end time 7:00 AM 8:30 to 9:15 PM 6-6:40 AM 7-7:30 AM Air temp/soil temp (2")/surface 63/63/ 57/60 63/62/62 66/ Rel humidity 56% 82% 83% 67% Wind velocity (mph) 0-1 1-5 0 0 Cloud cover 50% 100% 0 100% Soil moisture Very dry Very dry Dry Very dry Plant moisture Dew Dew Sprayer/PSI BP 30 PSI BP 30 PSI BP 30 PSI BP 30 PSI Mix size 2100 mls 4 plots 2100 2100 3 gal Gallons H20/acre 20 20 20 20 Nozzle type 5XR-8003 5XR-8003 5XR-8003 5-XR8003 Nozzle spacing and height 20/24 20/24 20/24 20/24 Soil inc. method/implement Incorporated within 15 minutes with Rotera Irrigated ~ ½ in. on 10-Jun - Irrigation 7 hours later

Table 3. Carrot seedling emergence and weed control before EPOST applications, Corvallis. Treatment Rate Timing Emergence Phyto Stunting Weed control 30-Jun Hairy nightshade Pigweed Common lambsquarters Common purslane Composite rating product lb ai/a no./4 ft bleaching (0-10) ------------------------------------------------------%--------------------------------------------------------- 1 Untreated - - - 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Bicyclopyrone 0.875 oz/a 0.011 PRE 21 2.0 48 89 88 88 88 91 3 Bicyclopyrone 1.75 oz/a 0.023 PRE 5 - a 100 100 100 100 100 100 4 Bicyclopyrone 3.5 oz/a 0.046 PRE 2-100 78 100 100 100 100 5 Bicyclopyrone 0.875 oz/a 0.011 2-3 Lf - - - 0 0 0 0 0 6 Bicyclopyrone 1.75 oz/a 0.023 2-3 Lf - - - 0 0 0 0 0 7 Bicyclopyrone 3.5 oz/a 0.046 2-3 Lf - - - 0 0 0 0 0 8 Tolpyralate 0.5 oz/a 0.013 PRE 18 1.3 18 61 88 100 75 68 9 Tolpyralate 1 oz/a 0.026 PRE 14 2.0 58 60 53 75 75 65 10 Tolpyralate 2 oz/a 0.052 PRE 4-98 98 100 100 78 99 11 Tolpyralate 0.5 oz/a 0.013 2-3 Lf - - - 0 0 0 0 0 12 Tolpyralate 1 oz/a 0.026 2-3 Lf - - - 0 0 0 0 0 13 Tolpyralate 2 oz/a 0.052 2-3 Lf - - - 0 0 0 0 0 14 Linuron 1 lbs/a 0.5 PRE 30 0 0 98 100 100 100 99 15 Prometryn 2 pt/a 1.0 PRE 36 0 0 100 100 78 100 100 16 EPTC 3.5 pt/a 3.1 PPI 31 0 3 97 100 100 100 98 17 Halosulfuron 1.00 oz/a 0.047 PRE 20 5.3 63 60 100 100 100 73 18 S-metolachlor + 10.66 oz/a 0.63 PRE 26 0 20 95 98 75 100 97 Bicyclopyrone + 0.875 oz/a 0.011 2-3 Lf NIS 0.25% FPLSD (0.05) 11 1.5 19 26 22 30 30 19 a No plants survived the treatment and phytotoxicity ratings were not possible.

Table 4. Crop safety and weed control in carrots 16-Jul, 2016, Corvallis. Treatment Rate Timing Phyto Stunting Weed control 16-Jul Hairy nightshade Pigweed Common purslane Lambsquarters Crabgrass Composite rating product lb ai/a bleaching 0-10 ------------------------------------------------------- % ----------------------------------------------------- 1 Untreated - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Bicyclopyrone 0.875 oz/a 0.011 PRE 0 95 73 97 100 63 50 80 3 Bicyclopyrone 1.75 oz/a 0.023 PRE - a 100 95 100 100 100 100 98 4 Bicyclopyrone 3.5 oz/a 0.046 PRE - 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 5 Bicyclopyrone 0.875 oz/a 0.011 2-3 Lf 4.0 13 50 55 0 0 0 35 6 Bicyclopyrone 1.75 oz/a 0.023 2-3 Lf 4.5 30 58 75 48 13 60 68 7 Bicyclopyrone 3.5 oz/a 0.046 2-3 Lf 5.5 45 65 63 17 60 50 58 8 Tolpyralate 0.5 oz/a 0.013 PRE 0 13 40 97 100 85 100 48 9 Tolpyralate 1 oz/a 0.026 PRE 0 43 45 100 100 100 100 50 10 Tolpyralate 2 oz/a 0.052 PRE 0 100 89 100 100 100 98 92 11 Tolpyralate 0.5 oz/a 0.013 2-3 Lf 2.8 13 23 70 25 0 50 30 12 Tolpyralate 1 oz/a 0.026 2-3 Lf 3.3 28 43 75 75 10 40 43 13 Tolpyralate 2 oz/a 0.052 2-3 Lf 4.5 50 56 83 33 17 50 56 14 Linuron 1 lbs/a 0.5 PRE 0 0 76 100 100 100 75 83 15 Prometryn 2 pt/a 1.0 PRE 0 0 99 100 75 100 100 99 16 EPTC 3.5 pt/a 3.1 PPI 0 0 89 100 63 82 100 90 17 Halosulfuron 1.00 oz/a 0.047 PRE - 100 33 100 100 100 100 53 18 S-metolachlor + 10.66 oz/a 0.63 PRE 5.8 50 98 100 85 100 100 98 Bicyclopyrone + 0.875 oz/a 0.011 2-3 Lf NIS 0.25% FPLSD(0.05) 0.9 16 27 33 56 32 54 26 a No plants survived the treatment and phytotoxicity ratings were not possible.

Table 5. Crop safety (26-Jul) and carrot root yield (26-Aug), Corvallis. Treatment Rate Timing Crop injury 26-Jul Carrot yield and grades 26-Aug, 2016 Phyto Stunting Roots Clean root yield Avg. root wt, < 5/ in dia 5/8 to 1 5/8 in dia. <2 in long Misshaped Cracked Composite weed control at harvest product lb ai/a bleaching 0-10 % no./a t/a g ------------------------------------ % ----------------------------------- 1 Untreated - - - - 0 25 80000 1.6 19 15 81 0 0 3 0 2 Bicyclopyrone 0.875 oz/a 0.011 PRE 2 89 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 3 Bicyclopyrone 1.75 oz/a 0.023 PRE - a 100 1500 0.1 18 0 0 0 0 0 98 4 Bicyclopyrone 3.5 oz/a 0.046 PRE - 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 5 Bicyclopyrone 0.875 oz/a 0.011 2-3 Lf 3 23 181000 9.7 48 1 95 1 1 3 60 6 Bicyclopyrone 1.75 oz/a 0.023 2-3 Lf 3 35 132000 6.9 50 1 94 1 1 2 83 7 Bicyclopyrone 3.5 oz/a 0.046 2-3 Lf 5 40 95000 4.0 28 3 92 1 0 4 96 8 Tolpyralate 0.5 oz/a 0.013 PRE 0 20 59000 3.3 41 1 87 0 1 9 24 9 Tolpyralate 1 oz/a 0.026 PRE 0 43 25000 1.5 51 2 93 0 0 5 41 10 Tolpyralate 2 oz/a 0.052 PRE 0 99 2000 0.1 14 13 87 0 0 0 93 11 Tolpyralate 0.5 oz/a 0.013 2-3 Lf 2 18 109000 3.1 25 5 88 2 0 3 40 12 Tolpyralate 1 oz/a 0.026 2-3 Lf 2 35 161000 8.3 47 1 93 2 1 3 73 13 Tolpyralate 2 oz/a 0.052 2-3 Lf 5 65 108000 4.3 37 5 91 1 1 2 78 14 Linuron 1 lbs/a 0.5 PRE 0 0 158000 13.0 76 0 91 1 1 6 78 15 Prometryn 2 pt/a 1.0 PRE 0 0 178000 14.8 76 0 92 2 1 4 95 16 EPTC 3.5 pt/a 3.1 PPI 0 3 151000 11.9 74 0 94 1 1 4 90 17 Halosulfuron 1.0 oz/a 0.047 PRE - 100 17000 0.4 7 0 70 0 0 0 30 18 S-metolachlor + 10.66 oz/a 0.63 PRE 5 63 108000 6.1 51 1 94 1 1 3 100 Bicyclopyrone + NIS 0.25% 0.875 oz/a 0.011 2-3 Lf FPLSD (0.05) 2.0 26 51200 2.9 24 - b - - - - 36 a No plants survived the treatment and phytotoxicity ratings were not possible. b One observation for each treatment because roots from replicated plots were composited into one sample to facilitate grading.

Table 6. Crop safety and weed control for carrots planted on 2-Jun. PRE and CHEM1 (chemigation) treatments applied on 3-Jun; 2-3 lf and CHEM2 (chemigation) treatments applied on 24-Jun, Pasco, WA. Treatment Rate Timing 22-Jun 28-Jun 29-Jun 28-July Weed control Crop injury Carrot stand Carrot ht. Carrot phyto rating Weed control product lb ai/a % % no./ cm % % cm Carrot ht. 1 Untreated - - - 49 0.6 240 9.8 0 29 44 2 Bicyclopyrone 0.875 oz/a 0.011 PRE 53 1.7 191 8.5 7 48 43 3 Bicyclopyrone 1.75 oz/a 0.023 PRE 75 7 141 6.9 19 68 32 4 Bicyclopyrone 3.5 oz/a 0.046 PRE 79 6.3 132 5.3 39 76 22 5 Bicyclopyrone 0.875 oz/a 0.011 2-3 Lf - - 229 7.3 37 49 36 6 Bicyclopyrone 1.75 oz/a 0.023 2-3 Lf - - 258 10.0 45 54 32 7 Bicyclopyrone 3.5 oz/a 0.046 2-3 Lf - - 244 7.3 56 73 25 8 Tolpyralate 0.5 oz/a 0.013 PRE 69 0 242 8.0 6 61 39 9 Tolpyralate 1 oz/a 0.026 PRE 79 28.5 121 6.3 67 76 31 10 Tolpyralate 2 oz/a 0.052 PRE 71 25.1 101 6.0 64 70 30 11 Tolpyralate 0.5 oz/a 0.013 2-3 Lf - - 253 9.3 7 40 40 12 Tolpyralate 1 oz/a 0.026 2-3 Lf - - 300 7.3 36 64 18 13 Tolpyralate 2 oz/a 0.052 2-3 Lf - - 241 6.8 50 50 17 14 Linuron 1 lbs/a 0.5 PRE 88 0 247 7.5 7 86 41 15 Prometryn 2 pt/a 1.0 PRE 88 1.1 250 8.5 6 85 43 16 Halosulfuron 1 oz/a 0.047 PRE 98 55.7 153 0.8 95 95 6 17 Halosulfuron 1 oz/a 0.047 CHEM1 65 3.6 219 7.0 22 53 39 18 Halosulfuron 1 oz/a 0.047 CHEM2 - - 179 5.5 32 60 38 19 Linuron 1 lb/a 0.5 PRE 93 2.6 239 7.0 20 91 42 EPTC 3.5 pt/a 3.1 PRE 20 EPTC 3.5 pt/a 3.1 CHEM1 58 0 241 10.0 0 49 44 21 EPTC 5 pt/a 3.1 CHEM1 84 0.6 239 8.8 15 59 44 22 EPTC 3.5 pt/a 4.4 CHEM2 - - 228 8.5 0 69 45 23 EPTC 5 pt/a 4.4 CHEM2 - - 228 8.3 0 46 44 FPLSD (0.10) 21.7 42.1 79 2.6 37.9 21 8

Table 7. Carrot root yield, Pasco. Treatment Rate Timing Carrot root harvest (15-Sept) Clean Weight Cull wt. Grade Net root yield <5/8" Diameter 5/8"-1 5/8" Dia. > 1 5/8" Diam. < 2" Length product lb ai/a ----------------------------------------- lb -------------------------------------- T/A 1 Untreated - - - - 27.1 0.4 2.1 23.9 0.1 0.1 31.6 2 Bicyclopyrone 0.875 oz/a 0.011 PRE 24.0 0.8 1.3 20.3 0.7 0.0 27.4 3 Bicyclopyrone 1.75 oz/a 0.023 PRE 13.3 0.2 0.4 10.9 1.0 0.0 15.3 4 Bicyclopyrone 3.5 oz/a 0.046 PRE 13.1 0.3 0.6 10.1 0.7 0.0 15.1 5 Bicyclopyrone 0.875 oz/a 0.011 2-3 Lf 20.7 0.2 2.1 18.1 0.1 0.0 24.3 6 Bicyclopyrone 1.75 oz/a 0.023 2-3 Lf 19.3 0.2 1.5 16.3 0.9 0.1 22.6 7 Bicyclopyrone 3.5 oz/a 0.046 2-3 Lf 14.7 0.3 0.4 13.1 0.6 0.0 17.0 8 Tolpyralate 0.5 oz/a 0.013 PRE 21.4 0.6 1.2 18.9 0.4 0.0 24.5 9 Tolpyralate 1 oz/a 0.026 PRE 19.1 0.4 0.4 13.0 5.2 0.0 22.2 10 Tolpyralate 2 oz/a 0.052 PRE 15.5 0.6 0.3 9.1 5.1 0.0 17.6 11 Tolpyralate 0.5 oz/a 0.013 2-3 Lf 24.3 0.4 1.4 20.4 1.3 0.0 28.3 12 Tolpyralate 1 oz/a 0.026 2-3 Lf 11.8 0.3 0.1 8.8 1.8 0.0 13.5 13 Tolpyralate 2 oz/a 0.052 2-3 Lf 3.9 0.0 0.1 3.0 0.1 0.1 4.5 14 Linuron 1 lbs/a 0.5 PRE 23.4 0.3 3.4 19.3 0.1 0.1 27.4 15 Prometryn 2 pt/a 1.0 PRE 25.9 0.3 2.2 22.1 0.4 0.1 30.4 16 Halosulfuron 1 oz/a 0.047 PRE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 Halosulfuron 1 oz/a 0.047 CHEM1 23.2 0.8 2.1 19.4 0.2 0.0 26.1 18 Halosulfuron 1 oz/a 0.047 CHEM2 20.2 0.4 1.9 16.5 0.8 0.1 23.3 19 Linuron 1 lb/a 0.5 PRE 23.7 0.3 2.5 20.3 0.2 0.1 27.6 EPTC 3.5 pt/a 3.1 PRE 20 EPTC 3.5 pt/a 3.1 CHEM1 23.4 0.5 2.4 20.2 0.1 0.0 27.2 21 EPTC 5 pt/a 3.1 CHEM1 27.1 0.2 3.5 23.1 0.0 0.1 31.8 22 EPTC 3.5 pt/a 4.4 CHEM2 25.2 0.4 3.2 21.2 0.0 0.1 29.3 23 EPTC 5 pt/a 4.4 CHEM2 27.2 0.3 1.7 24.8 0.0 0.0 31.9 FPLSD (0.10) 6.2 ns 1.6 5.7 2.4 ns 7.4