Workshop: Good groundwater & agriculture

Similar documents
Regional application of STOTRASIM for modeling of water and nitrogen dynamics in the unsaturated zone

Comparison of water drainage and nitrate leaching under three land use types in the North China Plain

Flanders in the European Union

Soil Fertility Management The Optimum Nutrient Balance. Stan Lalor Teagasc, Johnstown Castle. ASA Conference 20 Mar 2014, Portlaoise

Nichole M. Embertson, Ph.D. Whatcom Conservation District. May 2, 2012 Abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer Groundwater Nitrate Science Forum Abbotsford, CN

Situation of soil humus content of soils in Upper-Austria

Cover Crops and Soil Health Harvesting the Potential: Environmental Impacts of Cover Crops

Using Cover Crops to Reduce Leaching. Losses of Nitrate

Impact of changes in nitrogen and energy inputs at farm level. Léon Šebek. Efficiency and Environmental impact

Managing fertilization and irrigation for water quality protection

FertiliserStatistics2017

Agronomic, Economic and Environmental Benefits of Nitrogen Fertilizer Management

Nitrogen Fertilizer Management to Mitigate N 2 O Emissions in Alberta

Adapting to Climate Change: Maximizing Year-Round Crop Production for the Dairy Industry in the Lower Fraser Valley

2.7 Public Participation

CEPUDER Peter (1), SHUKLA Manoj Kumar (1), LIEBHARD Peter (2), TULLER Markus (1)

Indirect N 2 O emissions: Model-based quantification of N leaching and NH 3 emissions in OSR fertilized with mineral and organic fertilizers

Mitigation of pressures on water bodies by nutrient retention from agricultural drainage effluents using purification ponds

Soil and Water Conservation Research under Intensive Potato Production Systems in New Brunswick

How does Manure Application Timing Affect Phosphorus Loss in Runoff?

Legume-based catch crops can improve N-supply without increasing the N 2 O emission

Legume-based catch crops can improve N-supply without increasing the N 2 O emission

St. Peter Wellhead Protection

Impact of the Glastir Scheme:

Official Journal of the European Union DECISIONS

Applying the SWAT model to a Managed Irrigated Watershed in a Semi-Arid Region: Model Construction

Pete Fandel Illinois Central College llinois Council on Best Management Practices

Nutrient Management for Field Grown Leafy Vegetables a European Perspective Ian G. Burns

Abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer

Measuring & modelling soil water balance and nitrate leaching of perennial crops in New Zealand

Development of an Environmental Management System for Farms and its Introduction into Practice

Overview of Nitrogen Management and Groundwater: Considerations for manure irrigation

If you want to make small changes, change how you do things. If you want to make BIG changes, change how you see things.

79206 Breisach. 1 : Gutachterbüro TerrAquat, Steckfeldstr. 36, Stuttgart,

Mitigation of GHG emissions from crop production - governing factors and assessment

Calving Month Feed Budget Relative Cost

The Netherlands. Nitrate problem in the Netherlands. Compare California and the Netherlands

Numerical simulation of nitrogen groundwater pollution for proper management of cow manure

Welcome to the MWON Advanced Webinar Series

R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center North Carolina State University

Hood River Water Conservation Strategy: achieving long-term water resource reliability for agriculture & local fish populations

Afternoon Lecture Outline. Northern Prairie Hydrology

JAPANESE-DANISH DAIRY FARMING COLLABORATION

MINIMIZING THE RISK OF MANURE RUNOFF THIS FALL/WINTER. Nichole Embertson, Ph.D. Whatcom Conservation District

Nitrogen pollution of groundwater and surface waters in Thuringia, Germany: Status quo and management options (Germany)

Afternoon Lecture Outline. Northern Prairie Hydrology

The Organic Research Centre

Policy targets related to nitrogen emissions from agriculture the case of Germany

AARHUS UNIVERSITY. Food production and bioenergy, land allocation, land use with less environmental impact. Professor Jørgen E.

AARHUS UNIVERSITY. FarmAC model. Nick Hutchings & Ib Kristensen. Training session 1

The Development of the Indicator of Risk of Water Contamination by Nitrate in Canadian Agricultural Soils

MODELING PHOSPHORUS LOADING TO THE CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR USING SWAT

Greenhouse gas emissions from organic farming systems in Denmark

Managing Water to Increase Resiliency of Drained Agricultural Landscapes. Jane Frankenberger Agricultural & Biological Engineering Purdue University

Organic Farming as a GHG Emission Mitigation Possibility in Latvia

Conservation Agriculture in Organic Farming Motivations of European Farmers and Diversity of Practices

Estimating annual irrigation water requirements

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of XXX

Discovery Farms Minnesota N and P, what is happened in Farm Fields? Jerome Lensing January 9, 10, 11, 2018 AgVise Labs

Irrigation modeling in Prairie Ronde Township, Kalamazoo County. SW Michigan Water Resources Council meeting May 15, 2012

Natural Resources & Environmental Stewardship

5.5 Improving Water Use Efficiency of Irrigated Crops in the North China Plain Measurements and Modelling

Mid-level Evaluation of Climate Services: Seasonal Forecasts in Kazakhstan

Stored water, summer rainfall and the impact of summer fodders Cam Nicholson

Southland Monitor Farm Project

Nutrient Management in Tile Drained Fields

Climate Change Risk Assessment: Concept & approaches

Does a reduction of organic matter input reduce nitrate leaching and crop yield?

Modelling pesticide leaching at the regional scale in Austria with GeoPEARL

Exploring the Possibilities At Prado Dam

David Rowlings Institute for Sustainable Resources Queensland University of Technology

Animal and Forage Interactions in Beef Systems

Nitrate leaching from dairy farms in the Sand region in the Netherlands

The Potash Development Association Why Maintain Soil Potash Reserves?

Assessing Real Time - Drainage Water Management

International Research and Development. Designing a Crop Rotation Plan with Farmers

Evaluating the Reduction Effect of Nonpoint Source Pollution Loads from Upland Crop Areas by Rice Straw Covering Using SWAT

Agriculture and eutrophication facts and myths

Nitrates and Row Cropping

Scientific registration n : 1754 Symposium n : 14 Presentation : poster. ERIKSEN Jørgen, ASKEGAARD Margrethe

Fertilizer rally shows signs of cracks Better weather a good news/bad news story for applications By Bryce Knorr, grain market analyst

HOW TO ECONOMICALLY USE FERTILIZER IN PASTURE-BASED

EuroChem Agro GmbH. Introduction in EEF technologies and economical evaluation. Who pays for it? Dr. Thomas Mannheim, Head of Global R&D EuroChem

Corn Acreage, Fertilizer Use, & Spring Nutrient Discharge in the Mississippi River Basin: Relationships & Impact on Hypoxia

The Marin Carbon Project Can Land Management Enhance Carbon Sequestration in Soils?

Nitrous oxide mitigation in UK agriculture

Effects of anaerobic digestion on nutrient cycles, productivity and sustainability

Using SWAT to understand the eco-hydrological response to droughts of a dry Mediterranean agro-forested catchment, southern Portugal

Fertilizer N management strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions while optimizing grain yields from US rice and maize systems

Wetland Water Balance Linking hydrogeological processes to ecological effect

Risk-Based Decision Analysis in Ground Water Quality Management

Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

Nutrient management in organic greenhouse production; navigation between constraints

Sulphate, a new potential threat to the quality of surface water and groundwater. Ad de Goffau, Dico Fraters, Phillip Ehlert and Wim Chardon

Ethiopian Central Rift Valley: Current status, developments and policy implications

Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%)

Agronomic Insight 8 August 2017

ACCRETE Greece November 2007

Climate Change Impacts for the Central Coast and Hunter Regions

Aus dem Institut für Betriebswirtschaft, Agrarstruktur und ländliche Räume

Transcription:

Workshop: Good groundwater & agriculture Agronomic measures towards groundwater protective farming in the Murtal Univ. Doz. Dr. Johann Fank JOANNEUM RESEARCH, Institut for Water Resources Management Hydrogeology and Geophysics Dipl. Ing. Franz Feichtinger FEDERAL AGENCY FOR WATER MANAGEMENT, Institute for Land & Water Management Research Dipl. Ing. Dr. Georg Dersch AUSTRIAN AGENCY FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY, Institut für Bodengesundheit und Pflanzenernährung Dipl. Ing. Dr. Johannes Robier VERSUCHSREFERAT DER STEIRISCHEN LANDWIRTSCHAFTSSCHULEN 1 2 1

Höhenlage der Stationen: Graz-Thalerhof 337 m ü.a. Leibnitz 273 m ü.a. Bad Radkersburg 28 m ü.a. Groundwater protective farming Measures towards groundwater protective farming have the goal to keep Nitrate concentration in seepage water above the groundwater table (below the root zone) below 5 mg l -1 as a mean value (emission evaluation). Local relations (soil, weather, crop rotation ) have to be taken into consideration. Nitrogen loads from balancing have to be used for assessment. Pollution depends on groundwater recharge rate as well as on nitrate concentration. The evaluation of agricultural measures on the basis of groundwater data on nitrate concentration (imission evaluation) is influenced by dilution effects (rivers, lakes ) and will lead to complete different agricultural management principles at the same local relations. 3 Murtal 14 12 8 6 4 2-2 Monatssumme Niederschlag [mm] Monatsmittel Reihe 1971-2 7 Lufttemperatur [ C] 6 JAN FEB M AR APR M AI JUN JUL AUG SEP OKT NOV DEZ Graz-Thalerhof (823 mm) 25 33 44 52 82 12 123 111 83 66 57 27 Leibnitz (892 mm) 3 39 52 6 86 11 115 114 87 76 72 51 Bad Radkersburg (832 mm) 34 39 51 54 76 11 16 95 81 73 73 5 Graz-Thalerhof (8.7 C) -2.4 -.1 4.3 9. 14.2 17.4 19.1 18.5 14.2 8.8 2.8-1.1 Leibnitz (9. C) -2..2 4.6 9.2 14.5 17.7 19.4 18.6 14.5 9.1 3.2 -.8 Bad Radkersburg (9.3 C) -1.5.7 5.1 9.6 14.6 17.8 19.4 18.7 14.6 9.4 3.7 -.2 4 5 4 3 2 1-1 At the hydro-meteorological conditions of the Murtal the mean yearly sum of the climatic water balance is positve. Precipitation is up to 2 mm higher than evapotranspiration. 2

1.1.92 31.12.92 31.12.93 31.12.94 1.1.96 31.12.96 31.12.97 31.12.98 1.1. 31.12. 31.12.1 31.12.2 1.1.4 31.12.4 31.12.5 31.12.6 1.1.8 31.12.8 31.12.9 Nitrat [mg*l -1 ] GWSP [m ü.a.] Groundwater in the Murtal aquifer 264.25 Max. (1992-29) Min. (1992-29) Mittel (1992-29) 22 23 1996 29 264. 263.75 263.5 263.25 263. 262.75 262.5 262.25 1.1. 1.3. 1.5. 1.7. 1.9. 1.11. 1.1. 7 6 5 4 3 5 Agricultural land use and stock breeding Agricultural land use (without forests, settlement areas ) ~ 9 % arable farm land, 1 % meadows, pastures. ~ 7 % of arable land used for corn production (+ 1 % since 2); Pumpkins for oil production is of increasing importance (13 2 %). Close to the city of Graz market gardening is relevant. Stock breeding (development in the last 1 years) Number of farms (-32 %) and livestock owners (-38 %) is decreasing 47 % of the livestock units are living in farms with more than 2 livestock units (+ 7 %) Livestock breeding in the region is not too high should be kept Nitrogen from livestock breeding is < 6 kg ha -1 a -1 (- 1 kg ha -1 a -1 ) Amount of farm fertilizer in the Murtal region is not a problem of magnitude but a problem of disposition 6 3

Corn yield at test area Wagna (different amount of fertilization) 9 115 115 145 175 7 Corn yield at test area Wagendorf (different amount of fertilization) 8 4

Pumpkin yield at test area Kalsdorf (different amount of fertilization) 9 N min after corn harvesting Wagna Reststickstoff in NO3N+NH4N kg/ha 4 35 3 25 2 15 5 StandardversuchWagna, Anfang Oktober 28 oben mitte unten O A B C D E F G H I K L Versuchsreferat Steiermark 1 5

N min after corn harvesting Wagendorf Reststickstoff in NO3N+NH4N kg/ha StandardversuchWagendorf, Anfang Oktober 28 4 35 3 25 oben mitte unten 2 15 9 115 115 145 175 21 5 O A B C D E F G H I K L M Versuchsreferat Steiermark 11 N min after corn harvesting at randomly selected field in the region Reststickstoff in NH4N+NO3N kg/ha 4 35 3 25 2 15 5 oben mitte unten Maisfelder im Jahr 28 Versuchsreferat Steiermark 12 6

N (kg / ha) Large lot test field Wagna N-removal by catch crops 25 2 15 Klee (org. biol.) Perko nach Getreide Grasuntersaat Kürbis Grünschnittroggen nach Mais y =.357x + 17.445 R 2 =.9614 5 y =.333x - 23.66 R 2 =.8462 2 3 4 5 6 7 GTM (kg / ha) 13 N-balance at soil surface In a stable system is N-surplus at the surface equal the N-leaching to the groundwater At a groundwater recharge rate of ~ 3 mm N-surplus must not exeed 3-35 kg N ha -1 to keep nitrate concentration < 5 mg l -1 in seepage water. 14 7

Szenarios for groundwater protective farming in the region 15 Regional measures for groundwater protective farming Fertilisation based on the Austrian guidelines for appropriate fertilisation (6. print run, 26) with a mean estimated yield in the region. N-Balance Taking into account N deposition from atmosphere (1 kg N ha -1 a -1 ) an N-surplus at the surface of N-Import - N-Export <= 25 kg N ha -1 a -1 has to be kept. Balancing should be done für crop rotation periods (5 years). For balancing we need data on harvested yield, N-content in yield and amount of fertilization (including N-content of farm fertilizers) No N-fertilization in autumn N-fertilization in spring as short as possible before seeding or fertilization of growing plants Siting of catch crops during winter months (avoiding fallow periods over the year) N-management of legumes is critical and has to be considered specifically 16 8

Options for implementation and control Education and advanced training of the farmers Farmers must identify themselves with groundwater protection. Principles of sustainability must be considered Implementation of further test areas at different locations in the region to integrat heterogeneity of soil, weather and agricultural management Implementation of a nitrate information service (Internet) to disseminate the results of test areas and recommendations on groundwater protective farming to the stakeholders Ecological oriented advicing of the farmers to help them in N- balancing and to get necessary data Recording of data on harvested yield, fertilizer amount and N-content of manure will be a certification for groundwater protective farming. 17 Thank you very much for your attention Agronomic measures towards groundwater protective farming in the Murtal Univ. Doz. Dr. Johann Fank JOANNEUM RESEARCH, Institut for Water Resources Management Hydrogeology and Geophysics Dipl. Ing. Franz Feichtinger FEDERAL AGENCY FOR WATER MANAGEMENT, Institute for Land & Water Management Research Dipl. Ing. Dr. Georg Dersch AUSTRIAN AGENCY FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY, Institut für Bodengesundheit und Pflanzenernährung Dipl. Ing. Dr. Johannes Robier VERSUCHSREFERAT DER STEIRISCHEN LANDWIRTSCHAFTSSCHULEN 18 9