Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design

Similar documents
30 kip/ft (Dead load) 5 ft. 20 ft

M.S. Comprehensive Examination: Design

Comprehensive Examinations- Spring DESIGN Question

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

Traci Peterson Option: Structural Faculty Consultant: Memari. Executive Summary

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design November 15, 2004

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis

MCEER Hospital Demonstration Project

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

IF SECOND-ORDER EFFECTS NEED TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS EXAM, ASSUME A B1 MOMENT-MAGNIFIER OF 1.05.

TECHNICAL REPORT III LATERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

LEARNING OF ETABS. 15 ft

REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL BOUNDARY ELEMENT LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING TERMINATION

CASE STUDY OF A 40 STORY BRBF BUILDING LOCATED IN LOS ANEGELES

CE 549 Building Design Project Spring Semester 2010

Council on Tall Buildings

CE 549 Building Design Project Spring Semester 2013

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SEISMIC EVALUATION PEER REVIEW

HIGH RISE CONDO SOHO, NEW YORK, NY

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #3 November 21,

Structural Design Engineers 120 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410 San Francisco, California / Fax 415/

Design Example 2 Reinforced Concrete Wall with Coupling Beams

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Response of TBI case study buildings

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

Thesis Proposal. La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower San Diego, California. December 13, 2013

Third Avenue New York, NY. Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report September 30, Michelle L.

William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio

Dead Loads (psf): Concrete Floor Slab on Metal Deck 45 psf Mechanical and Ceiling 7 psf Miscellaneous 5 psf Exterior Wall 80 psf

Composite Steel/Concrete

Southwest Housing, Arizona State University

THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER

The problems in this guide are from past exams, 2011 to 2016.

TECHNICAL REPORT 1. Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions. Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital. Hershey, Pennsylvania

Executive Summary Building Description: Introduction... 13

Structural Redesign Gravity System

Campus Square Buildings C & D Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design (S-3)

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

UNION STATION EXPANSION AND RESTORATION

Erie on the Park. Timothy Moore Penn State University Architectural Engineering Structural Emphasis Advisor: Prof. Ali Memari

Technical Report 1. Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition. Salamanca, NY

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design

Seismic Behaviour of RC Shear Walls

Design- Lateral System:

Technical Report #3: Lateral System Analysis. Executive Summary

CE 3150 Reinforced Concrete Design Design Project

Fairfield Inn and Suites Pittsburgh, PA

MASONRY WALL DATA: Wall Height = ft. Nominal Wall Thickness = 8.00 in. Depth to c.g. Steel, Wall = 3.81 in.

James Hauck 1 and Christine Moe 2

HIGH RISE CONDO SOHO, NEW YORK, NY

Technical Report #1. Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA. Cody A. Scheller. Structural Concepts & Existing Conditions Report

Table of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5

John Jay College Expansion Project

Technical Report #3. Matthew R Peyton

September 26, 2014 Dr. Linda Hanagan Lhanagan.engr.psu.edu

1000 CONTINENTAL SQUARE

Structural Technical Report 3

Letter of Transmittal

DESIGN STUDIES OF THE SIX STORY STEEL TEST BUILDING. The Working Group on Steel Structures of the Joint Technical

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

Best Buy Corporate Building D (4) Richfield, MN

Engr. Thaung Htut Aung M. Eng. Asian Institute of Technology Deputy Project Director, AIT Consulting

Technical Report #1. Matthew R Peyton

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF AN INNOVATIVE STEEL SHEAR WALL SYSTEM

Visteon Village Corporate Center

Check the strength of each type of member in the one story steel frame building below.

School of Engineering and Applied Science Building Miami University, Oxford, OH Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007

Kevin Wigton Structural Option. Technical Report III. Simmons College School of Management, Boston, Ma

Comparative Study of Irregular-shaped RC Building with Different Lateral Load Resisting Systems

Office Building-G. Thesis Proposal. Carl Hubben. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis

Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007

PricewaterhouseCoopers Building Oslo, Norway

Case Study in Steel adapted from Structural Design Guide, Hoffman, Gouwens, Gustafson & Rice., 2 nd ed.

Executive Summary...2 Introduction...3 Structural System Overview Buffalo,...4 Foundation...4 Floor System...4 Gravity System...4 Lateral System...

PEER Tall Building Seismic Design Guidelines

Structural Technical Report I October 5, 2006 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

5-story Residential Building

Design Criteria. Analysis and Design of a High Rise Steel Braced Frame Core 22

Technical Assignment #3 November 15, 2004 Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

Lesson Objectives. CEE 3100 Structural Mechanics Fall 2011

CCTV HEADQUARTERS. ARCH 631 Spring 2018 Daniel Edith Mckenzie Rafael

John Jay College Expansion Project

3. Analysis Procedures

Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22):

Hyatt Place North Shore. Pittsburgh, PA T. Technical Assignment #1. Kyle Tennant. Kyle Tenn. Structural (IP) [Type the document subtitle]

MITRE 3 Building McLean VA

DESIGN OF A STEEL SPECIAL MOMENT FRAME SUSCEPTIBLE TO HIGH SEISMIC RISK

Letter of Transmittal

La Jolla Commons Office Tower. Appendix Slides. Architecture Breadth. Dual Systems Check. Lateral System. Shear Wall Modeling. Verification.

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

Structural Option Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA

Principles of STRUCTURAL DESIGN. Wood, Steel, and Concrete SECOND EDITION RAM S. GUPTA. CRC Press. Taylor& Francis Group

Perma-Column Deck Post Design Manual

Investigation for the Removal of Steel Tie Rods in a Historic Segmental Arch Floor

Transcription:

Fall Semester 2018 Preliminary Exam - Structural Design A small building is located in downtown Berkeley. The structural system, either structural steel or reinforced concrete, comprises gravity framing plus one-bay moment frames located around the perimeter of the building. The sketch to the right shows moments and shears for the first-story beams, calculated using linear elastic methods under code-specified loads D (dead), L (live), and E (earthquake). Load E has been reduced by coefficient R as permitted for seismic design. (a) In this sentence, underline either structural concrete or structural steel to indicate the material you will use for your design.

Fall Semester 2018 (b) Make a bullet list describing the steps you would follow to design the beams in the first elevated level above the base. Use as many bullets as needed. Be brief rather than wordy.

Fall Semester 2018 (c) Design the beam from the face of the joint to one beam depth from the face. Whether a steel beam or a concrete beam, make sure the beam cross section is symmetric. Show beam size, important details, etc.

Fall Semester 2018 (d) Make a bullet list describing in some detail the steps you would follow to design the beam-column joint in the first elevated level above the base. Use as many bullets as needed. As a final bullet, make a sketch of the joint. You need not calculate quantities, but show typical required details.

Spring Semester 2018 Preliminary Exam - Structural Design A rigid block is supported on four columns laid out on a 28 ft by 28 ft grid. The columns are supported on a rigid foundation on a very stiff rock. The columns are fixed against rotation at both ends. Weight W comprises 1400 kips service dead load and 400 kips service live load. You may otherwise ignore selfweight. Total design lateral load V is 400 kips, which was calculated from the design earthquake loading using ASCE 7 including permissible force reduction factor R/I e. For this problem, assume the load V acts in one horizontal direction and ignore loading in the orthogonal horizontal direction and the vertical direction. The columns can be either structural concrete or structural steel. If concrete, use f c = 4000 psi and Grade 60 steel, and assume the column has square cross section. If steel, use A36 steel. An engineer has completed preliminary designs for both steel and concrete, with the resulting nominal strengths shown. (a) In this sentence, underline either structural concrete or structural steel to indicate the material you will use for your design. (b) Calculate the shear force, moment, and axial force in each column due to the lateral force V. (c) Use the LRFD method to assess whether the column moment design is sufficient for the specified loads. You may ignore second-order effects. (d) Describe how you would use engineering software to determine whether the structure was likely to uplift during a strong earthquake. Be specific about what load combinations and member properties you would use. (e) Conduct an approximate hand analysis to estimate whether overturning is likely.

Fall Semester 2017 Preliminary Exam - Structural Design A small office building with square floor plan is braced by single-bay moment frames located around the building perimeter, with one moment frame per side. A typical elevation is shown. The remainder of the framing is of reinforced concrete flat-plate framing supported on columns, and can be classified as gravity framing not designated as part of the seismic-force-resisting system. Service loads comprise self-weight, which can be taken as 100 psf acting on the floor area, plus 50 psf live load. The building is located in a region of high seismicity. The design earthquake response spectrum is shown. Note that the design earthquake response spectrum represents elastic response of a single-degree-of-freedom oscillator with 5% of critical damping subjected to ground shaking with approximately 475-year return period. (a) Determine the design base shear for the building along one of its principal axes. (b) Determine the design moment for a moment frame beam at the face of the column. (c) Size the beam for required moment strength using an accepted design method, with either reinforced concrete or structural steel. (d) Given the selected beam size, estimate the maximum axial tension that might reasonably occur at one of the pin supports supporting the moment resisting frame.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Dept. of Spring Semester 2017 Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials Ph.D. Preliminary Examination: Design Consider the frame shown below subjected to dead load and earthquake loading. Ignore the selfweight and select your material (steel or reinforced concrete) as you prefer making use of the information given below. All loads are unfactored. Use factored load combinations in your design. According to your chosen material, design the column either as a R/C column or a steel column. For the concrete case use a reinforced concrete square section. For the steel case, use a box section. The beam design is not part of this problem. You do not need to consider buckling in the column design. Justify any assumptions you may make. After designing the column, compute the horizontal deflection at the column under the given unfactored (service) forces assume linear elastic response in your calculation. The horizontal deflection should be limited to 1/1000 of the column height because of the presence of important drift-sensitive nonstructural components. If the calculated deflection is larger than this limit, comment (without calculations) on how the deflection can be reduced. 30 kip/ft (Dead load) 20 kip (Earthquake Load) 5 ft 20 ft STEEL Steel: Fy=36 ksi, Fu=58 ksi CONCRETE Steel rebars: Fy=60 ksi; Concrete: f c=4,000 psi

Student s Name (Please Print) University of California at Berkeley FALL 2016 Department of SEMM Doctoral Preliminary Examination: Design Important Note: All the information you need to do the problem below is provided. If you need any information that is not provided, you need to use a value and explain your reason for using the value. No questions can be asked during the exam. a. Consider all failure modes of the R/C column and steel girder and calculate the maximum factored load P u for the structure shown. b. Using the value of the P u calculated in part a design the moment connection at B between the steel girder and the R/C column. Show the calculations and detail of the connection on a neat sketch. CROSS SECTION OF THE STEEL GIRDER Concrete: f c = 6,000 psi W c = 150 pcf PL 18 x2 F y =50ksi, Top & Bottom Flanges PL 36 x1.5 F y =50ksi, Web 3/8 3/8 F exx =70 ksi Fillet Welds 3 in. Covers A 5 ft. P u P u 5P u 5P u B Moment Connection 20 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. Steel Girder D Ties:# 5 @15 in. c/c F y = 60 ksi 28 ft. R/C Column 16 # 9 bars F y =60 ksi 36 in. C Fixed Base 36 in THE STRUCTURE CROSS SECTION OF THE R/C COLUMN

Department of Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS- FALL 2015 DESIGN Question Consider the propped shear wall shown in the figure. The wall is subjected to earthquake lateral forces (E) as shown. The Dead Load (DL) and Live Load (LL) of each floor supported by the shear wall are also given. All loads given (i.e. E, DL and LL) are service loads (not factored). You are required to do only the following: 1. Design the necessary thickness of the reinforced concrete shear wall as well as all the necessary reinforcement for this wall to resist the applied loads. Make reasonable assumptions about all parameters of design, and material properties and explain all your assumptions and why you made those assumptions. 2. Design the steel pipe bracing (both braces will have the same pipe section). Both ends of the braces are pin-connected to the concrete wall and concrete foundation. Again make all assumptions you need in your design and explain the basis for your assumptions. 3. Draw a clear sketch showing the details of the pin connection of the steel tube bracing to the reinforced concrete shear wall. 4. List failure modes of the pin-connection in Item 3 above that you would check if you had enough time to do the actual design of the pin connection. All of the information you need for this problem are given. Still, if you feel you need a piece of information that is not given, make a reasonable assumption and continue the problem. No questions can be asked during the exam. You can use approximate equations if you do not remember the exact equations, but, you have to explain the approximation and how that approximation might affect your design. A portion of the grade will be assigned to how reasonable your assumptions were and how well you have explained the justification of your assumptions.

Simple steel gravity frame, not participating in lateral force resistance. E 3 =200 kips 2@14 ft E 2 =150 kips DL=90 kips LL=60 kips DL=90 kips LL=60 kips Reinforced concrete shear wall in this floor to be designed. E 1 =100 kips DL=90 kips LL=60 kips Details of this Pin connection to be sketched 28 ft 14 ft Steel Bracing Member to be designed. 14 ft 10 ft 14 ft

Student s Name (Please Print) (Last: ) (First: ) Structural Engineering Mechanics and Materials Department of, University of California at Berkeley Spring Semester 2015 Preliminary Examination- Design Question Important Note: All the information needed to do this problem are given below. If you still think there is an item that you need and is not given, or an equation that you need to use but do not remember, please make an assumption, explain your assumption and use your assumed value or equation and continue your solution. No questions can be asked or answered during this exam. Problem: Consider the gable frame shown below subjected to gravity, wind and crane loads. Ignore the self weight and select your material as you see fit and explain why you selected a particular steel or concrete material. All loads are unfactored loads. Use factored load combinations in your design. Design the Column AB as a R/C column. Beam design is not part of this problem. For concrete case use a reinforced concrete square section. Then design the column as a steel box column. For steel case use a welded square steel box section made of four plates with the same thickness. 30 ft 3 kips/ horiz ft. (Dead Load) 3 ft C 8 kips (Wind Load) B 20 kips(crane Load) Steel or Reinf. Conc. Frame 14 ft 20 ft A