Annual International Marine Coatings Summit October 31, 2008 Automated Soluble Salt Meter ISO 8502-6 & 8502-9 Equivalent Presented by: Mr. Herbert Jansen electronic developments 1
Introduction About the SSM Equipment Design Key Features Measurement Procedure Comparison of the Bresle method and the SSM Independent Testing Approvals Brief Summary 2
Introduction The SSM is a patented design that provides a hand held, automated method for detection of soluble salts. The Model RPCT-07-001 was performance tested and approved as an alternative method of taking conductivity measurements by the United States Navy. Listed in Standard Item 009-32 FY-10 The US Department of Transportation is in the process of approving the SSM for use. 3
Measurement Equipment 4
SSM Design 1. MENU button 2. ENTER button 3. LCD screen 4. Green/Red LED status indicator 5. Piston 6. Magnets 7. Silicone seal 8. Plunger 9. Power/USB port with protective plug 10. Tube connector 5
Key Features Only fully automated tool available worldwide Exactly replicates the Bresle method No consumables, sticky residue, syringes Proven to reduce cycle time for new ship construction (lean manufacturing) Measures conductivity and fluid temperature Displays both conductivity and concentration Data extraction into any Coatings Technical File (CTF) 6
Measurement Procedure 6 Simple Steps 7
Process Steps 1. Attach meter to surface 2. Inject deionized water into measurement chamber with one press of the dose bottle 3. Meter automatically agitates solution (~ 45 seconds) 4. Meter automatically takes reading Displays reading on LCD screen Stores values electronically 5. Wipe remaining water from surface after removing SSM 6. Flush meter by turning over and injecting water from dose bottle. 6 Total Process Steps 1 minute 8
Attach Meter to Surface Magnets allow the meter to adhere to any ferrous surface Removal is easy with no sticky adhesive residue as with the Bresle patch 9
Inject 3 ml Deionized Water The included dispenser automatically doses exactly 3ml of deionized water every time. Reduces the risk for human error No syringes required 10
Meter Agitates Solution and Extracts Salts 4 conductivity sensors and 1 temperature sensor Reading takes less than a minute 11
Reading Displayed and Stored Stores 10 batches of 100 readings 12
Data Transfer via USB with SSMlink software
Clear display and storage of batches
Data export in.xls format for direct use in any Coating Technical File
Comparison of methods SAMPLING AREA Bresle Method SSM 1250 mm 2 (footprint variable due to stretching) 1250 mm 2 (circular fixed footprint) WATER INJECTION METHOD Bresle Method SSM Manual syringe injection (prone to errors) Automated, with simple press of 3 ml fixed volume dispenser 16
Comparison of Methods ATTACHMENT METHOD Bresle Method SSM Patch with adhesive Prone to leaving adhesive residue on surface Magnetic with silicone seal No effect on surface quality Proven to seal over deep pits RECORD KEEPING Bresle Method SSM Manual Measurements must be recorded by hand Automatic Up to 1000 measurements stored electronically. Computer upload for QA reporting In Coating Technical File 17
Comparison of Methods Bresle Method SSM Dosing Accuracy Variable with user ± 0.05 ml Air Evacuation Manual syringe removal Automated (measurement chamber relaxes automatically no time delays) Solution Agitation Method Manual rub patch with finger Automated plunger agitation Measurement Process Steps 17 6 Total Process Time (Reading to Reading) 10 minutes 1 minute Calculation Conductivity measurement converted to equivalent NaCl concentration manually using equation. Conductivity measurement converted to equivalent NaCl concentration automatically by meter. 18
SSM Technical Specifications Temperature Sensors 1 probe (stainless steel) Working Temperature Range 5 50 C (41 122 F) Temperature Accuracy ± 0.3 C Conductivity Sensors 4 probes (stainless steel) Measurement Range 0-300 µs/cm (0-360 mg/m 2 ) Measurement Accuracy Indicators Memory Power Supply Calibration ± 1% full scale Red/Green LED Holds up to 1000 measurements (10 batches of up to 100 measurements each) Lithium-ion rechargeable battery Not required; meter is calibrated by manufacturer. Daily validation method provided. 19
Independent Testing Verification of Accuracy and Efficacy 20
Field Testing Patch leaves adhesive and foam residue on surface following removal SSM can attach to any orientation (vertical, overhead, etc.) 21
Summary of Testing Tested by the US Navy in field studies Reduced labor by over 50% Ease of use-immediate results recorded electronically Tested by two independent laboratories against the Bresle method and benchmark laboratory grade conductivity meter Concurrent Technologies Corporation (CTC)- February 2008 Corrosion Control Consultants & Labs, Inc. (CCC&L)- April/May 2008 22
Laboratory Test Method 50 test areas were evaluated for 3 different doping concentrations. 10 doped tests were run on each panel. A total of 5 panels were used for each concentration. The center of each identified patch area was doped with 50 µl of solution. The doped panels were allowed to dry in the laboratory at ambient conditions overnight (~15 hours). After drying the panels were tested according to the Bresle Test Method. 23
Comparison SSM Mean Solution 1: 41.76 µs/cm Solution 2: 57.02 µs/cm Solution 3: 89.26 µs/cm Standard Deviation Solution 1: 2.39 µs/cm Solution 2: 1.71 µs/cm Solution 3: 2.46 µs/cm Bresle Mean Solution 1: 41.44 µs/cm Solution 2: 56.64 µs/cm Solution 3: 88.5 µs/cm Standard Deviation Solution 1: 3.48 µs/cm Solution 2: 4.26 µs/cm Solution 3: 3.33 µs/cm 24
Conductivity ( S/cm) 40 50 60 70 80 90 Conductivity ( S/cm) 40 50 60 70 80 90 Conductivity ( S/cm) 40 50 60 70 80 90 Box Plots of SSM and Bresle Data SSM Bresle Doping Solution 1 SSM Bresle Doping Solution 2 SSM Bresle 10/31/2008 Doping Solution 3 25
Density 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 Density 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 Density 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 Density 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 Density 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 Density 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 Doping Solution 1 Doping Solution 2 Doping Solution 3 SSM SSM SSM 35 40 45 50 55 Conductivity ( S/cm) Doping Solution 1 45 55 65 75 Conductivity ( S/cm) Doping Solution 2 75 85 95 105 Conductivity ( S/cm) Doping Solution 3 Bresle Bresle Bresle 35 40 45 50 55 Conductivity ( S/cm) 45 55 65 75 Conductivity ( S/cm) 75 85 95 105 10/31/2008 Conductivity ( S/cm) 26
Conclusion Independent testing demonstrates that both methods return equivalent results. The mean measured values are almost identical. The only discernable difference between the two methods is that the SSM has much lower variability in measurements. The variance in SSM measured values is significantly less than those measured with the Bresle patch. 27
Summary United States Patent No. 6,946,844 was issued on 20 September 2005. International patents have been filed. Approved and implemented by US Navy for soluble salt determination in accordance with NAVSEA Standard Item 009-32 (FY-10) Equivalent to ISO Standard 8502-6 Extraction of soluble contaminants for analysis -- The Bresle method Automatically calculates equivalent soluble salt concentration in accordance with ISO Standard 8502-9 Field method for the conductometric determination of water-soluble salts 28
Questions? International Sales: Hedon Electronics Development B.V. www.solublesaltmeter.com Phone: +31 (0) 15 2755555 US Sales: ARP Instruments, Inc. www.rpct.net Phone: (540) 752-7651 electronic developments 29