Wenita Forestry Natural Areas Assessment Form

Similar documents
Appendix 2. Operational Plan for Implementation of the Regional Pest Management Strategy 2014/15

Attached submission for the Proposal for the Canterbury Regional Pest Management Plan , regards Jamie McFadden

Woodland Case Study No. 1

QLDC Council 24 March Report for Agenda Item: 5

Ithaca Creek Habitat Monitoring

Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas

Fig 14. Map of Central Management Unit. CENTRAL Management Unit

New Zealand forests - background. Native Beetles in an Exotic Landscape Investigating the conservation value of plantation forests in New Zealand

THE FACTS ON FOREST FRAGMENTS

SASPoM Four Year Land Management Priorities

Network utilities, subject to compliance with Part 6 (Infrastructure) A.3 Existing vegetation cover.

Latest lakeshore vegetation survey and an update on willow control

Overland Park, KS Stream Riparian Corridor Quality Evaluation

INVESTIGATION REPORT. RARE AND THREATENED FLORA SPECIES DETECTION SLENDER TREE-FERN (Cyathea cunninghamii) BALD MOUNTAIN TRACK

Basic Information: Individual Vernal Pool

2

Aongatete Sub-Catchment Action Plan

SOUTHWOOD WOOD MANAGEMENT PLAN Water courses. Mature alder coppice. Old boundary bank to the east.

Managing Grassland Ecosystems: Student Worksheet

FACILITATING CARBON OFFSETS FROM NATIVE FORESTS

SEV field sheets V10.3 October 2013 Stream Ecological Valuation (SEV) field sheets Site description. Current weather conditions(tick) Clear/sunny

EAGLE NEST SEARCH PROPOSED PULP MILL REPORT AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE SURVEY. Suzette Weeding Forest Conservation Planner Gunns Limited

A remnant patch is either:

How Much Habitat Is Enough? How Much Disturbance is Too Much?

Land Management Framework Options for Landholders. David Eddy & Luc Farago Sustainable Land Management

Native Vegetation Precinct Plan

3/8/2015. What You Will Learn: Intermediate Use Areas: Considerations and Tools. Time line for Forestry Activities

Introduction. Property Boundary and Survey Evidence

Wildlife Management Intensity Standards

Wildlife Management Planning Guidelines for the South Texas Plains Ecoregion

Green Gold Label Program

Enclosed farmland: Arable and Horticultural, Improved and Neutral Grasslands

AVALONIA LAND CONSERVANCY FEE LAND STEWARDSHIP PRINCIPLES

S e c t i o n B i o d i ve r s i t y

Range Effectiveness Evaluations Part 2 Rangeland Health and Plant Residue

Application Form. Afforestation Grant Scheme April 2017 (2018 planting) Property Details. For office use only. Contact person: Contact person:

How Much Habitat is Enough?

Hawke s Bay Regional Possum Control Technical Protocol (PN 4969)

Trees on farms Growing trees for timber

Te Mania Sub-Catchment Action Plan

Help to protect our patch

Land Use: Forests, Rangelands, Parks and Wilderness

Document CH FMP CH FMP APPENDIX E FFGA AS #238

Woady Yaloak Catchment Group

American Tree Farm System Management Plan Template

Soil Conservation Survey of the Mangarama Catchment

Code of Practice for Timber Production. Draft for Public Comment

14. Sustainable Forestry Principals

Site Condition Evaluation & Environmental Benefits Report

Developing forestry practices. Managing for Timber and Wildlife Diversity NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION PRE-HARVEST PLANNING:

A program of the WSMD within the ANR. Determines the condition of Vermont s wetlands

The Effects of Exotic Forests on Soil, Ground Water, Water Quality, Air Quality and Native Flora and Fauna

Planting and Managing Native Trees

Natural Area Mapping and Inventory of Vinmont Veteran Park 2011 Survey

Refereed article Variation in bird species abundance in a commercial pine plantation in New Zealand

Yes. Place on invasive plant list, no further investigation needed. STOP. Yes. Place on invasive plant list, no further investigation needed.

Dry Swale Wet Swale Grass Channel Dry Well Permeable Pavement Bioretention DESIGN ELEMENTS

Ramsley woodland creation

Anne Hairston-Strang MD DNR Forest Service September 7, 2017

SD48. Sites List: Whitbarrow Township Allotment

Work Plan EAS Components

Eco-Schools USA Biodiversity Audit

Forest & Range Evaluation Program

1.1 Registered property owner 1.2 Plan author information. Roll number (19 digits) Property description Area (municipality, lot, concession)

Te Puna/Waipapa Sub-Catchment Action Plan

Appendix 1. Vancouver s Ecological Network

FOREST ECOSYSTEM INDICATORS AND MEASUREMENT

PRINCE GEORGE NATURAL AREAS AND THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE: CASE STUDY

14017-B THE RIVERVIEW GROUP WEST BELCONNEN VEGETATION SURVEY SUMMARY

5.3 CONSERVATION (WETLAND) ZONE

An Analysis of IMC Estimated Reclamation Costs for the Proposed Ona Mine

Protecting London s wildlife for the future Riddlesdown Nature Reserve Management Brief

Wildlife Benefits of Managed Timber

MISSOULA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2018 COST-SHARE APPLICATION

Using Science & Silviculture to Improve Land Stewardship. Dan Donahue Dan Evans Norcross Wildlife Sanctuary

Benefits, costs, priorities for improvement

CCLUP Land Use Order

7.0 Leadbeater s Possum

BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas

Restoration Mitigation Impacted Ambient Reference Training

FACT SHEET LANDHOLDER SERIES -PROPERTY PLANNING- Native vegetation on your property. Benefits of native vegetation

Ecologically Beneficial Native Afforestation Site Prioritisation. for carbon sinks and other purposes. Kāpiti Coast District

Rabbits: A threat to conservation & natural resource management. How to rapidly assess a rabbit problem and take action

Land and Water Management Challenges Identified by some Waitekohe sub-catchment landowners

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINE NO. 19 Vegetation Retention

Conservation of Biological Diversity

ROUNDTABLE MEETING ON SUSTAINABLE PALM OIL. RSPO Guidance for the Management and rehabilitation of Riparian Reserves Holly Barclay

ON-FARM CONSERVATION: Resource Inventory Checklist

3.14 VISUAL RESOURCE (SCENERY)

Mosquito Hill Biotic Inventory Data Sheets feet radius circle (1/100 th of a Hectare)

Rappahannock County Riparian Buffer Study. Submitted by: Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia Institute of Marine Science.

The Aviary at Rutland Ranch. Phase 1. Manatee County FSP

Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015

Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.

ON-FARM CONSERVATION: Resource Inventory Checklist

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (CRAM) Buffer and Landscape Context Attribute

1/16/2016. California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (CRAM) Buffer and Landscape Context Attribute. Buffer and Landscape Context Attribute

FURTHER COMMENTS ON NES FOR PLANTATION FORESTRY

Design With Nature: How to Create an Old Growth Forest. Chuck Pettis Earth Sanctuary

ON-FARM CONSERVATION: RESOURCE INVENTORY CHECKLIST

Transcription:

Wenita Forestry Natural Areas Assessment Form ite Location Description Site Name: Berwick Location: Berwick Catchment: Waipori/Mahinerangi Region: Berwick/Mahinerangi Compartment ID: 316 NZMS Grid Reference GPS Coordinates NZMS Grid Reference East 170, 02 5079 East 1,370,900 North 45, 52 4868 North 4,915,005 Accuracy Area in Hectares from GIS 3.4 Aerial Photograph Reference V 383-1140 (Wenita) Site Assessment Assessment Date(s) 16 TH May 2017 Revision Date (s) 13 th June 2017 Final Report Date (s) 13 th June 2017 Assessed By Mike Mullan (Wenita) Recorded By Mike Mullan (Wenita) Notes: Primary Vegetation Type Primary native forest (undisturbed) with emergent podocarps Modified native forest (disturbed through logging of native timber) Secondary (regenerated forest after land clearance) Re-vegetated forest (re-established on bare land through planting) Heavily modified (dominated by weed and exotic species) Pasture land (predominantly exotic grassland with some weeds) Tussock grassland with typical native shrub species Wetland (predominantly wetland/marshland) Exotic Production Forestry Notes: Primarily a wetland/bog with a tussock grassland species. Tick box as appropriate (Predominant) Vegetation Health Did the primary, modified or secondary forest N/A Describe as appropriate

sites have significant canopy gaps? If yes give an estimate of the number of these and their approximate size. In the primary, modified or secondary forest sites show signs of regeneration of native seedlings and shrub size species in the forest floor using the following; N/A 1. No visible seedlings 2. Occasional but sporadic and sparse 3. Very common almost every step with a few gaps 4. Abundant and thick making access difficult In the primary, modified or secondary forest sites was the plant composition of the forest floor intact with fern and other smaller ground cover species? N/A 1. No visible forest floor species 2. Occasional but sporadic and sparse 3. Very common almost every step with a few gaps 4. Abundant and thick making access difficult In the tussock grassland with typical native shrub species were there visible gaps, areas of bare vegetation, or areas dominated by exotic forest species visible in the site? If yes give an estimate of the number of these and their approximate size. In the tussock grassland sites was there evidence of regeneration of the native plant cover of grass, shrub and groundcover across the site using the following: 1. No visible seedlings 2. Occasional but sporadic and sparse 3. Very common 4. Abundant In the wetland (predominantly wetland/marshland) sites visible gaps, areas of bare vegetation, or areas dominated by exotic forest species visible in the site? If yes give an estimate of the number of these and their approximate size. In the tussock grassland sites was there evidence of regeneration of the native plant cover of grass, shrub and groundcover across the site None 3 Very Common None with exception of a wire-rush area within the wetland area. 3 Very Common

using the following: 1. No visible seedlings 2. Occasional but sporadic and sparse 3. Very common 4. Abundant Notes: Overall the vegetation was uniform and consistent. Describe the presence, density and species of weeds within the assessed area and give estimations of the potential cover of those species. Pest Plant Presence Vine Species Muehlenbeckia Passionfruit Old Man s Beard Chilean Flame Creeper Convolvulus Other Are there multiple vine species present? (If yes describe) Are the vines species limited to gullies or area fringes? (Describe) Notes: Heavy >50% Canopy No N/A Moderate >10-30% Canopy Light <5-10% Canopy Sparse <5% Canopy None Not Observed Pest Plant Presence Shrub Heavy >50% Moderate >10-30% Light <5-10% Sparse <5% None Not Peripheral edges of Internal parts of

Tree Species Area Area Area Area Observed area? Yes/No? Gorse Broom H Honeysuckle Elderberry Hawthorn Spanish heath Willow Sycamore Wilding Pine <5 years Wilding Pine >5 years Other (Describe) area and advancing? Yes/ No? Pest Plant Presence Ground Cover Species Aluminium plant Periwinkle Ivy Nasella tussock Iris Blackberry Montbretia St John Wort Agricultural grasses Heavy >50% Area Moderate >10-30% Area Light <5-10% Area Sparse <5% Area None Not Observed Peripheral edges of area? Yes/No? Internal parts of area and advancing? Yes/No

Other (Describe) Peripheral areas of Yorkshire Fog grass was noted and this has probably arrived with over-sowing of adjacent areas for exotic forestry site preparation. Pest Animal Presence Species Heavy Significant faeces sign, marking or prints. Animals seen or heard Moderate Fresh scattered sign, prints or marking in areas Light Uncommon sign, marking or prints in area Sparse Very uncommon sign, marking or prints in area None Not Observed Domestic stock sign is the area fenced? Yes /No? Opossum No No Deer No No Pigs No No Goats No No Sheep (Wild) No No Cattle (Wild) No No Feral Cat No No Mustelids No No Vermin No No Other (Describe) Does the area border a farm Yes/No? Are there known animal control programmes undertaken in this area? (Describe) Is the number of recreational hunting permits and animals harvested from the area known for the last 12 months? (Describe) The Post Office creek site was subject to a 1080 drop by TB Free New Zealand last year in July targeting possums. This should have reduced the possum population quite significantly. This block only has been recently reopened to recreational hunting after the 1080 drop in July last year.

Notes: There was pig sign present in the assessed area.

Uncontrolled Human Impacts Activities Common use within the area, heavy vehicle tracks Occasional incursions into the area Light Sporadic use Sparse 4 WD Ute/Car 4WD Quad Bike Motor Bike Mountain Biking Fire-wooding Camping/Fires Camping/Toileting Hunting (unpermitted) Dumping Vegetation Dumping Household Notes: None Note the type and number of bird species found within the area. This is not a definitive count or an estimate of abundance only an observation based on the time of assessment. Avian Fauna Native Species Number Notes Falcon 0 Tui 0 Bellbird 1 Heard in adjacent D.fir across from site Kereru 0 Robin 0 Tomtit 0 Morepork 0 Shining cuckoo 0 Silvereye 0 Fernbird 1 Wasn t visually confirmed but song was heard in the area Scaup 0 Pukeko 0 Other (Describe)

Note the type and number of bird species found within the area. This is not a definitive count or an estimate of abundance only an observation based on the time of assessment. Avian Fauna Exotic Species Number Notes Blackbird Sparrow Starling Harrier Thrush Rosella Magpie Geese Mallards Chaffinch 3-4 Other (Describe) Water Catchment Overview Yes No Estimated Number Major water bodies (>5 metre in width) within its boundaries? Minor water bodies (<5 in width) within its boundaries? 3-4 Are there wetlands, bogs or fens within the areas boundaries? Entire area Artificial water races or water courses? Storage ponds or dams Does the area have an existing SHMAK monitoring site within it? Do roading culverts run into the area? Notes: This area is a significant wetland site that has multiple narrow streams running into and through the site. Significant water flow comes out of this area into an adjoining similar site.

The shape, scale and situation of the assessed site will describe how the site connects to the wider landscape as a habitat for the growth of flora and fauna. Aerial photograph and mapping will give a good understanding of this aspect of the assessment, but should be undertaken with a physical inspection. Landscape and Connectivity Describe the shape of the assessed area. a) A narrow long strip < 50 metres wide adjacent to a waterway b) A narrow long strip <50 metres wide adjacent to farmland or exotic forest c) A small patch <1-2 hectares d) A compact core area with outer strips reaching out from the core e) A solid compact defined area f) Neither (Describe) Is the area isolated from similar sites within the location? (i.e. surrounded by exotic forest a) The area is surrounded by exotic forest b) The area is surrounded by pasture or farm land c) There are similar sites within 5-10 kms d) There are other similar sites within 2-5 kms e) There are other similar sites <1 km f) There are other sites immediately adjacent g) Unknown (Describe) D: 2 larger central cores attached by a narrow strip A. The area is surrounded by recently harvested and mature exotic forest. Difficult toll whether there are other similar types of sites in the area. Notes: No significant change during the last assessment. There was no signs of wildings or major pig rooting observed. The site is still in a good order.

Natural Area Ranking Classification Rank Description Criteria Score 5 Exceptional Large undisturbed site No exotic weeds or introduced species Highly endemic and representative to the particular ecological district 4 Very High Last example of its type which was previously widespread in the district Some peripheral disturbance to vegetation in pre European period Creates a large continuous section across the area >200 hectares with minor <5% weed or introduced species cover along fringes Secondary vegetation creates buffer to "exceptional" areas 3 High Modified native vegetation representative of the district and with elements of former composition remaining Contains areas of modified secondary vegetation which provides a buffer to "very high" areas >75 hectares with small areas of weed infestation on the outer fringes (10-20%) Last of the vegetation type in the district but in a modified condition through historical change 3 2 Moderate Substantial human modification of areas Small areas of disparate native vegetation Occasionally act as buffers to larger higher quality sites Very high weed dominance along fringes moving towards outer core Native vegetation cover >10-25% of the area 1 Low Very small disjointed areas of native vegetation (sporadic trees or shrubs) Heavy dominance of exotic vegetation and weeds Heavily modified landscape and landforms Examples of secondary succession caused by human disturbance that has created a vastly different vegetation type than previously found Native vegetation covers <10% of area A tussock grassland wetland/bog that has been surrounded by production forestry the site provides a high value part of the wider catchment with typical native species intact, though with a degree of modification at some stage in its history. It has no major buffer zones of similar or higher value but provides a high degree of wetland and biodiversity connectivity from its position in the wider landscape. While the site looks uniform in vegetation the understorey and ground cover has a wide range of wetland moss, fungi and plant life.

Recommendations and Additional Comments Monitoring and removal of the wilding exotics and woody weeds as required. Care to ensure that over-sowing in adjacent areas does not overlap into the wetland area. Record photographs and their storage of this site assessment Photographic Recording File number Storage path Date Taken Photographer Post office creek 2017 16/5/2017 Mike Mullan