Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the North Business Park Specific Plan

Similar documents
# 14 ) ZN AMERICAN DIALYSIS CENTER OF NORTH LAS VEGAS M-2, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO M-1, BUSINESS PARK INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING

DALLAS CITY CENTER MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS. September 2016

A GUIDE TO. Vaughan s Planning Process

URBAN RENWAL Frequently Asked Questions

Project Scope and Timetable

Chapter II. Community Growth Strategy A. COMMUNITY GROWTH STRATEGY DIAGRAM AND DESIGNATIONS. 1. Adoption of Growth Strategy Diagram

WINCHESTER FREDERICK COUNTY (WIN-FRED) METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN (PIP)

WINGRA CREEK MARKET STUDY AND REDEVELOPMENT STUDY Scope of Services

The Port Authority will demolish, remediate, and clear the site for future development by a company or end user.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE. Joint Study Session April 13, 2017

BOARD 1 WELCOME. Public Consultation No1 about the Potential Redevelopment of Bleadon Quarry 18th-19th September Purpose of Consultation

SUBJECT: Burlington s Mobility Hubs: Work Plan for Area Specific Planning. Committee of the Whole. Planning and Building Department.

ARTICLE 38: AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENT FOR URBAN INFILL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS

Media Briefing. February 7, 2011

RRC SELF-EVALUATION. A tool for Michigan communities seeking RRC certification

Rio/29 Phase 1 Briefing. Rio/29 Small Area Plan Phase 1 January 18, 2017

City of Kawartha Lakes Growth Management Strategy and Municipal Master Plan Project

Olde Town Station Urban Renewal Plan

# 7 ) UN MY PLACE HOTEL SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING

Subject: Bayfront Industrial Area Renewal Strategy PIC Meeting #2 Date and Time: Thursday, June 14, :30 p.m.-6:00 p.m.; 6:30 p.m. 8:00 p.m.

Introduction Page I-1 INTRODUCTION

CITY OF MILTON UDC CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION

MINUTES LOUISVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, Louisville Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman Casar presiding.

1. Replace Section 6 in A Parking Policy Framework for Calgary (TP017) in its entirety with the contents in Attachment 2.

Welcome to the Public Information Centre. Red Hill Business Park South Transportation Master Plan Addendum. June 25, :00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Commercial Zoning Update

SELF-EVALUATION FORMS. A tool for Michigan communities seeking RRC certification

The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles

Three Rivers Region Public Consultation Process. Summary Report

Staff Report and Draft Findings

THE MICHIGAN INLAND LAKES PARTNERSHIP Governance Document September 2011

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

Syracuse General Redevelopment Plan Study Areas #1-3

APPLICATION PROCESSING. CHECK WITH STAFF - Development Services Staff will explain the requirements and procedures to you.

Intended Outcomes. Chapter Five - Citywide Economic Development Strategy Economic DEVELOPMENT

Development Review and Implementation

3. What this will mean for Electoral Registration Officers and Electoral Administrators

I. I N T R O D U C T I O N

QLDC Council 8 November Report for Agenda Item: 1

Economic DEVELOPMENT. ED/Market Opportunities. Assets to Capitalize On. Guiding Principles. Community Conscience. ED Priorities. City-Wide Strategies

City of Greater Sudbury Infrastructure Background Study APPENDIX A.1. Guideline for Sewage and Water Services

Waterfront Merger Redevelopment Project Area. Joint Public Hearing City Council/Redevelopment Agency Agenda Item 9.

REGIONAL PLANNING AND POLICY FRAMEWORK A Preferred Approach for our Regional Growth

PSDA Schema Workshop. Summary Findings 25 th September 2017

OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS

2017 NORTH OGDEN CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT

RSG Member and Chair One Norbiton RSG Member and resident and Chair of CREST

REPORT TO COUNCIL. Report No.:

Community Consultation Report December 2016

SWLR Change 1 21 Jun 07 those requests at the next update unless prohibited by current SMP. Any approval of these requests will require forma

Sacramento Tree Ordinances Update

Report for Agenda Item: 2

SELF-EVALUATION FORMS. A tool for Michigan communities seeking RRC certification

City of Brantford Chapter 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Regular Meeting Minutes

North Greenbush Main Avenue Redevelopment Plan SWOT Workshop. Please Sign In

Customer Transformation Programme: Phases 2-4. Interim Chief Operating Officer. Summary

ARCHITECTS ON TAP OR ON TOP? THE FACILITY YOU WANT (AND KEEP YOURSELF NICE)

Patrick Prescott, Community Development Director By: David L. Kriske, Assistant Community Development Director

AGENDA REPORT. Recommendation: Approve the draft 2018 Comprehensive Plan.

Corporate Report. Report from Office of the Chief Administrative Officer, Administration

What we ve heard key issues

Handout 1: Logistics and Exercises

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Development Next to Freight Rail Corridors Policy

NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND PRESTON ROAD AREA PLAN Advisory Task Force Meeting # 4 February 16, 2016

I-65/I-70 North Split Interchange Reconstruction Project Frequently Asked Questions

Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Public Information Meeting October 11, 2011

WSU Tree Removal & Replacement Policy

SKEMA-SC Skills, Knowledge, and Experience Mastery Assessment: South Carolina High School Credential Guidelines and Rubric

The Municipal Land Use Law, at N.J.S.A. 40:55D-89, includes the following statement relative to the periodic examination of a municipal Master Plan:

SUBJECT: Draft New Official Plan: Public Consultation and Engagement Summary

RE: WAVERLEY WEST SOUTHEAST NEIGHBOURHOOD AREA STRUCTURE PLAN. Standing Policy Committee on Property and Development

Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (WSMPO) Prioritization 4.0 Evaluation Criteria and Point Assignment Process

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SUBMISSION March 28, 2017

Hillsborough County 2045 Population and Employment Projections and Allocations. Project Update. Plant City City Commission February 26, 2018

BREEAM Communities 2012 Bespoke International Process Guidance Note GN07 December 2013

STAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting date: April 13, 2016 Item: UN Prepared by: Marc Jordan. Dion Co (Coex Import Export Corp)

Maidstone Borough Council Draft Local Plan February 2016 Local Plan Regulation 19 Representation from Helen Whately MP

Sudbury to Hudson Transmission Reliability Project Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

APPENDICES. Table 46: Quantified Objectives (October 2013 to October 2021) New Construction Rehabilitation Conservation/Preservation

North Woodbridge Urban Mixed Use Master Zoning Plan

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

REPORT Meeting Date: Regional Council

Draft Land Use, Scenario Planning, & Sustainability Technical Report. Summary

Town of Lincoln COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN. Prepared by the Town of Lincoln Plan Commission

Request for Proposals (RFP) for DDA Consultant Services

NAPOLEON TOWNSHIP 6755 S Brooklyn Road. PO Box 385 Napoleon, Michigan Telephone: (517) FAX (517)

CITY OF EAST LANSING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

MINUTES OF MEETING INDIAN HILL PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2011

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 3A 1

Light Impact Industrial (IL-1) Zone in the South Westminster Area. The Planning and Development Department recommends that Council:

Update: Draft Long Term Waste Management Strategy. Public Works and Infrastructure Committee

READVILLE YARD 5 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT NOTICE OF PROJECT CHANGE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION August 17, 2017

Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report Vallco Special Area Specific Plan

At 8.28pm Cr Robartson moved, seconded Cr Woodall

Calgary Airport Vicinity Protection Area Regulation Amendment

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROCEDURES

Transcription:

Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the North Business Park Specific Plan 1. What is a Specific Plan? - A Specific Plan is a planning tool for refining a community s vision for a particular area. Communities use Specific Plans for areas that are to be master planned for new land use zoning in existing areas that need clarity about their direction for the future. A community can use a Specific Plan to guide land use activity, development and reinvestment in the planning area. Per State Law, a Specific Plan must be consistent with the General Plan. - Per State Law, a Specific Plan must include the following information: o Text and diagrams showing the distribution, location and extent of all land uses, including open space; o Proposed distribution, location, extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy and other essential facilities needed to support the land uses; o Standards and guidelines for development, and standards for the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources, where applicable; o Program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, public works projects and financing measures; and o Statement of the Specific Plan s relationship to the General Plan. 2. Why are we doing the North Business Park Specific Plan? - The North Business Park Specific Plan (NBPSP) is an effort to guide the inevitable redevelopment of the aging business park area on the north side of the 101 Freeway, west of Lindero Canyon Road. Rather than responding to individual property owner requests for changes to zoning, the City views the NBPSP as a tool to provide a framework within which redevelopment can take place that will allow property owners to see some economic benefit for reinvesting in their properties, while enabling the City to ensure that development that is approved can be accommodated by the existing or planned infrastructure. The City maintains much more control, and can better anticipate and avoid problems, if the redevelopment of the area is looked at as a whole, rather than as individual lots without any context.

- While the state housing mandates do identify a need for new housing in the City of Westlake Village, the NBPSP is NOT being put forward in response to those mandates. The study in advance of the Plan was begun in response to increased pressure to redevelop some of the larger parcels within the Plan area in 2007-08, and an acknowledgement that the City would be better served responding to that pressure with an adopted plan in place. There are residential components included in the plan as proposed, and they will be adequate to meet our current state housing allocation, but it is not accurate to state that the plan must be adopted in order to meet the state requirement. 3. Can the North Business Park Specific Plan be modified from what is in the plan as currently drafted? - The Draft Specific Plan is just that: a Draft. The City Council is free to make any changes to the Draft Plan that it deems appropriate. However, the Draft Plan, as currently drafted, has been arrived at after several years of study and analysis, and has been designed to achieve the goal of providing incentives to property owners to avoid the development of blight, while minimizing impacts to nearby properties (and the region in general), particularly as they relate to traffic and congestion north of the 101 Freeway. - Significant changes to the Draft Plan will necessitate revisions to the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), which will entail new studies and analysis. 4. Will land use zoning change? - In many parts of the Specific Plan area, zoning will change. These changes may be minor and include new commercial or industrial uses or new development standards, or they may be more significant and involve a major change in use (such as from industrial to residential). - In other areas of the NBPSP, zoning will remain the same. These are areas which appear to remain economically viable in the coming years, and for which no intensification was deemed necessary. - Property owners, as well as interested residents, should review the NBPSP for potential changes to areas of concern, and direct any questions to the Planning Department. 5. Who are the consultants working on the North Business Park Specific Plan? - The lead consultant on the NBPSP is Civic Solutions. The project manager for Civic Solutions is Jean Ward, who was the project manager for the Arroyo Group which prepared the original plan. Jean has led a team of consultants to work on

completing this plan, which includes engineers, economists, landscape architects, and environmental assessors. - The consultant for the preparation of the DEIR is Psomas. They have incorporated the work done by the consultant team that designed the plan with further studies and analysis to prepare the DEIR, which is the required environmental review documentation for this Specific Plan. The project manager for Psomas is Kent Norton. 6. What has changed from the 2014 version of the North Business Park Specific Plan? - There have been substantial changes to the 2014 draft of the NBPSP. The most significant changes have been the deletion of significant amounts of commercial development, the relocation and intensification of the residential components, and an overall reduction in development intensity across the entire NBPSP area. - Overall, the intensity of development proposed in the new plan has been reduced about 32% from the previous plan. The main goal of this reduction of intensity was to reduce traffic impacts. Traffic impact analysis as part of the Environmental Impact Report shows that the reduction of intensity and the change in the mix of land uses has greatly reduced the traffic impacts. - These changes were made in order to reflect new economic realities in real estate and development, as well as to minimize impacts (primarily traffic impacts) to areas in the vicinity of the NBPSP area. 7. How does the North Business Park Specific Plan relate to the State mandated housing laws? - As mentioned in #2 (above), while not prepared with the intent of responding to State regulations, the development scenario proposed in the Draft NBPSP is sufficient to meet the current (2013-2021) State housing allocation and likely the next (2022-2030) housing allocation as well. Approval of the NBPSP would enable the City to gain compliance with State housing law and avoid the penalties and potential legal action that can arise from non-compliance. - The State housing mandates may be met in ways other than the approval of the NBPSP. If the Plan is not approved, the City can rezone other property in the City for housing development in sufficient quantities to meet the state allocation. - Failure to identify locations for housing development will result in penalties and potential legal action, which could result in court mandated rezoning of City owned properties to allow the development of housing. 8. Once the North Business Park Specific Plan is adopted by Council, what happens then? - If the NBPSP is adopted by the City Council, the impetus of redevelopment will then shift to the property owners in the Plan area. The City will not be

compelling changes to existing properties, with the possible exception of some types of businesses which may need to cease within an established time frame (proposed 15 years). Redevelopment of the Plan area is expected to take a considerable amount of time, perhaps as much as 25 years. - As a comparison, the Westlake North Specific Plan area, began as a single ownership holding of vacant land and took over 20 years to completely develop in a period of high economic growth and relatively lax regulatory environment. The NBPSP is a completely developed area consisting of 54 parcels owned by a large number of property owners, in a much more restrictive regulatory environment. While this does not mean that redevelopment won t begin shortly after the adoption of a plan, the obstacles to large-scale development projects are substantial and will likely take considerable time to work out. Many property owners may find that more modest expansions of their existing properties will be preferable given the considerable investment of time and money to coordinate a more ambitious project. 9. How can I provide feedback on the North Business Park Specific Plan? - Written comments and feedback on the NBPSP may be sent to the City at any time between now and the public hearing date. Please direct these to Scott Wolfe, Planning Director/Deputy City Manager, at 31200 Oak Crest Drive, Westlake Village, CA 91361, or via email at Scott@wlv.org. - Verbal comments and feedback should be presented to the City Council at the discussion of the Plan to be held at the regular City Council meeting on April 24, or at the public hearing, which is expected in June. - Comments on the DEIR should be in writing and must be delivered to the City by 5:00 pm, on May 15, 2019. Comments received after this date will be passed to the City Council at the time of the hearing but will not be responded to as a part of the environmental documentation. Please direct these to Scott Wolfe, Planning Director/Deputy City Manager, at 31200 Oak Crest Drive, Westlake Village, CA 91361, or via email at Scott@wlv.org. Also, please identify your comments as Comments on the Environmental Impact Report in order to ensure that they are responded to properly. 10. How can the community be kept informed and participate in the process? - Interested persons should visit the City s website, download the Plan and the DEIR, and sign up for North Business Park Specific Plan updates on the Notify Me page. Email or text messages will be sent with updates notifying subscribers of upcoming meetings, new information, other news about the NBPSP process. In addition to staying informed, interested persons should attend one or more of the upcoming meetings of the City Council (April 10 study session or April 24

regular meeting), other informational sessions (dates to be announced), and the public hearing (tentatively expected in June). As always, questions can be directed to the Planning Department at (818) 706-1613. This document may be updated in the future. Check in periodically to view any new updates.