Development Permit Development Variance Permit

Similar documents
Development Permit Development Variance Permit

Rezoning Development Permit Development Variance Permit

Development Permit. Development Permit to permit exterior renovations and a minor addition to an existing automotive dealership.

Development Permit. Development Permit to permit conversion of the existing roller rink into retail units. Approval to Proceed

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Rezoning. Rezone from RA to RF to allow subdivision into approximately 24 single family lots. Approval to Proceed

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: Development Permit Development Variance Permit

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT. Development Permit Development Variance Permit

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

OCP Amendment Temporary Use Permit

City Of Surrey. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

ALR - Non-Farm Use Rezoning

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: Rezoning from RA to RF-13 to allow subdivision into 3 single family small lots.

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

The Corporation of the District of Central Saanich

City of Surrey ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS File:

Report Date: March 16, 2018 Contact: Anita Molaro Contact No.: RTS No.: VanRIMS No.: Meeting Date: April 17, 2018

Light Impact Industrial (IL-1) Zone in the South Westminster Area. The Planning and Development Department recommends that Council:

MASTER SIGN PLAN BRADFORD

DP Glacier Lane Whistler/Blackcomb Lift Workshop Addition Council Presentation. April 14, 2015

City of Rowlett 6 November 2012 Form Based Code ARTICLE 5 SIGNS 5.1 INTENT.

Rezoning from RM-D to RF

DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR ON-PREMISE SIGNS AND AWNINGS (Adopted June 17, 2003)

Tuesday, February 6, Council Chambers City Hall Avenue Surrey, B.C. Tuesday, February 6, 1996 Time: 7:14 p.m.

Architectural Commission Report

Architectural Commission Report

isite Ltd Retrospective Billboard 83 Victoria St, Christchurch City

Tuesday, November 19, Council Chamber City Hall Avenue Surrey, B.C. Tuesday, November 19, 1996 Time: 7:00 p.m. A.

Architectural Commission Report

OUTDOOR ADVERTISEMENTS AND SIGNAGE

Uniform Sign Plan (USP) Weston Planned Unit Development (PUD) 86-USP-007

(DC2) SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PROVISION

AND FURTHER THAT this Development Permit be valid for two (2) years from the date of Council approval, with no opportunity to extend.

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT

Architectural Commission Report

(d) Metal buildings used for industrial uses are not exempt from additional landscape standards as required in Section (e).

4.SIGNAGE INTRO TO CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER CONTENTS. Sign Definitions 58

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Wall Signs. Appearance Code and Design Guidelines

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

District Identification Signage

140. The intent of this District is to permit institutional and public uses and to accommodate specified related residential uses.

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: Development Variance Permit to reduce the minimum rear yard (north) setback.

The following provisions shall apply to the Plant Riverside sign district:

The requested signage does not comply with the Land Development Code in the following areas:

FILE: (South Westminster)

Architectural Commission Report

CITY OF ENUMCLAW January 18, 2018 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Page 1 of 5

4.SIGNAGE INTRO TO CHAPTER 4. Sign Definitions 58

Rezoning from IL to CD (based on IL)

TOWN OF TROY SIGN ORDINANCE

CITY OF HARTFORD GUIDELINES FOR SOLAR ON HISTORIC PROPERTIES SECTIONS ADOPTED 2017

2012 International Building Code 2011 National Electrical Code Local amendments to the codes are in Chapter 6 of the Code of City Ordinances

SALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC East 3 rd Avenue February 5, 2015

Building Height and Cellars, Basements and Crawl Spaces

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: October 3, 2016

Commercial Solar Photovoltaic System Permit

BIRMINGHAM HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 3, 2016 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan

ATTACHMENT B THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CA RESOLUTION NO._6022_

Version 06/2017 Page 1

Architectural Commission Report

Signs and Outdoor Advertising Structures: The purpose of this Ordinance is: 3. To improve pedestrian and traffic safety.

City of Lafayette Staff Report

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Appendix H Solar Energy Systems (SES) (Revised Ord. No )

REPORT TO COUNCIL. Date: January 23, RIM No City Manager. Community Planning Department (TB) BC Ltd Inc No.

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

The requirements set forth in this Section shall govern the construction and/or installation of all Renewable Energy Systems:

M E M O R A N D U M. Property Description: Located on the northwest corner of Keller Parkway (FM 1709) and Rufe Snow Drive, at 989 Keller Parkway.

A. The temporary use of one on-premise portable sign provided that the portable sign Page 1 of 8 07/26/2016 ORD.821

Regular Council - Land Use Minutes

COACH HOUSE HOW TO GUIDE DISTRICT OF NORTH VANCOUVER. New Housing Options for Changing Community Needs

Advertising structures and signs

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

CITY OF PLACERVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Address: 1920 Enterprise Way Applicant: Meiklejohn Architects

Memorandum. nl2/«o SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Harry Freitas

B-2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Uses allowed in the B-2 Community Commercial Business District are subject to the following conditions:

Architectural Commission Report

PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Municipal Address, Phone & Fax NONRESIDENTIAL

Submittal Requirements for Administrative Design Review of Signage

For Duplicate Buildings and Buildings of 60,000 Gross Square Feet or Greater

SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPLICATION

Uniform Sign Plan (USP) Millpond Village 00-USP-003

Architectural Commission Report

Conditional Planning Exemptions

Architectural Commission Report

COMPREHENSIVE SIGN CODE UPDATE. City of Topeka Planning & Development Dept. 2/26/19

STONE RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS

Transcription:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: Development Permit Development Variance Permit Proposal: Recommendation: DP to allow a new free-standing sign. DVP to increase the number of fascia signs from one to four, to increase the maximum fascia sign area and to allow a fascia sign to extend over the roof line. Approval to Proceed for the DVP. Refer Development Permit back to applicant Location: 12350 Pattullo Place Zoning: CHI OCP Designation: Industrial NCP Designation: Highway Commercial Industrial Owner: 621870 B.C. Ltd.

PROJECT TIMELINE Completed Application Submission Date: December 16, 2003 Planning Report Date: March 22, 2004 The applicant is proposing: a Development Permit; and a Development Variance Permit to vary the following Sign By-law regulations: to increase the number of fascia signs from one to four; to increase the fascia sign area from 19.1 square metres (205.7 sq.ft.) to 51.4 square metres (553 sq.ft.); and to allow one fascia sign to extend above the roof line in order to allow additional signage for a commercial building in South Westminster.

The Planning & Development Department recommends that: 1. Council refer Development Permit No. back to the applicant to revise the design of the proposed free-standing sign; and 2. Council approve Development Variance Permit No. (Appendix IV), varying the following, to proceed to Public Notification: (a) (b) (c) to increase the number of fascia signs prescribed in Section 27(2)(a) of the Sign By-law from one to four; to increase the fascia sign area prescribed in Section 27(2)(b) of the Sign By-law from 19.1 square metres (205.7 sq.ft.) to 51.4 square metres (553 sq.ft.); and to vary Section 27(2)(e) of the Sign By-law to allow one fascia sign to extend above the roof line. 3. Council instruct staff to resolve the following issue prior to final approval: (a) submission of a sign design that satisfies the objectives of the Surrey Sign By-law and to the satisfaction of the City Architect. SITE CHARACTERISTICS Existing Land Use Xcaliber Bowling Centre. Significant Site Attributes SkyTrain guideway runs along the north property line. East: Across Pattullo Place, McDonald's Restaurant and camping supply business both zoned CHI, designated Industrial. South: Mixed use highway commercial building, zoned CHI, designated Industrial. West: Southern rail right-of-way. North: Mixed use, multi-tenant building, zoned CHI, designated Industrial. PLAN AND POLICY COMPLIANCE OCP Designation: NCP Designation: Complies. Complies. DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS Background The overall form and character of the development along Pattullo Place is regulated by Development Permit No. 6793-0480-00. This Development Permit regulated the form, massing, landscaping schematic and signage plan for the seven lots created, including the subject lot.

Of the original development, two lots, located at 12345 and 12333 Pattullo Place remain undeveloped. The subject site is zoned Highway Commercial Industrial Zone (CHI). On July 20, 1998, Council approved Development Permit No. 7996-0110-00 to regulate the form and character of a proposed 36-lane bowling centre on the site. When considering the Development Permit, Council also considered a Development Variance Permit to relax the maximum height of a free-standing sign from 2.5 metres (8 ft.) to 8.3 metres (27 ft.). This proposed sign was in the shape of a bowling pin, with a reader board at the cuff of the bowling pin. Council denied the variance for this sign. The applicant finalized the Development Permit for the subject site without any free-standing sign. With the adoption of Surrey Sign By-law No. 13656, the maximum height of a free-standing sign for this area has been increased from 2.5 metres (8 ft.) to 4.6 metres (15 ft.). Current Proposal The owner has made application for a Development Permit to allow the installation of a free-standing sign, to legalize the three installed fascia signs, and to permit a fourth fascia sign. A Development Variance Permit application was necessary to increase the number of fascia signs from one to four, to increase the maximum fascia sign area from 19.1 square metres (205.7 sq. ft.) to 51.4 square metres (553 sq. ft.) and to allow one fascia sign to extend above the roof line. The new Development Permit will supplement the approved Development Permit No. 7996 will remain in force and effect. 0110-00, which PRE-NOTIFICATION In accordance with Council policy, a development proposal sign was erected on the property. To date, staff have not received any comments or concerns with respect to the proposal. DESIGN PROPOSAL AND REVIEW A sign company, hired by the owner, installed three fascia signs without a Development Variance Permit to increase the number of fascia signs and without a Sign Permit. The applicant has requested a Development Variance Permit to legalize these three fascia signs, and to permit a new fascia sign on the south elevation. The fascia signs identify the name of the centre, and the activities available within the building (sports bar, restaurant, bowling, etc.). The building has a floor area of 3,030 square metres (32,620 sq. ft.). The Surrey Sign By-law allows one fascia sign per tenant. As this is a single occupant building, only one fascia sign is permitted. The Sign By-law limits the area of fascia signage based on the frontage of the premises. Therefore, in accordance with the Sign By-law based on the site's frontage of 20.8 metres (68.6 ft.), there can be a maximum of 19.1 square metres (205.7 sq. ft.) of fascia signage. The applicant has requested, together with the increase in the number of fascia signs, an increase of fascia sign area to 51.4 square metres (553 sq. ft.). The applicant has also requested a free-standing sign, which is proposed to be located in the landscaped area

along Pattullo Place. The design of the proposed free-standing sign includes a small area identifying the name of the bowling centre, and a larger area which is a changeable message board for announcing special events etc. The sign is mounted on a gray metal clad pole, approximately 4.3 (14 feet) in height. Staff have reviewed the proposed free-standing sign, and suggested a number of simple changes to better reflect the character of the building, and to reflect the stylized lettering of the fascia signs. Suggested changes to the design of the sign included hanging the top portion of the sign to match the fascia signs on the building, providing a metal lattice below the reader board, and supporting the sign on two poles rather than a single pole, which would effectively frame the sign. The applicant has requested that the free-standing sign proceed for Council's consideration as submitted. The Official Community Plan provides criteria for the design of free-standing signs as follows: Free-standing signs should be provided with bases; preferably using the same material as is used for the principal building. These signs should be architecturally coordinated with the overall design and integrated into landscaped areas. (The proposed sign is mounted on a pole and does not incorporate a base. The sign does not reflect the architectural lines or materials of the building. The proposed sign is a similar grey colour to the building with red lettering which is similar to the fascia signs) "Three dimensional" signs designed to become an architectural feature or a landmark are encouraged rather than billboard type, pole mounted "flat" signs. (The proposed sign is a pole mounted flat sign.) In commercial and industrial developments, avoid back-lit acrylic or plastic "box" type signs unless they are integrated into the overall building design. (The sign is flat and back lit.) Provide signs to indicate street address and/or the name of the development, with design consideration for visibility and legibility of the sign from the fronting street, and provide lighting for night time visibility of the sign. (The proposed sign indicates the name of the business and does provide for visibility at night.) As the proposed free-standing sign does not satisfy the majority of the Official Community Plan objectives adopted by Council, it is recommended that the Development Permit for the free-standing sign be referred back to the applicant to work with staff to alter its design such that it: reflects the style of the fascia signage by having the "X" extend above the top of the sign; is mounted using a support structure on either side of the sign rather than a single pole mount; has the supporting structures mounted in a base structure; and treats the space between the reader board and the base of the sign with an architectural finish or feature, such as a wide metal lattice. The architectural design of a free-standing sign is only one detail in the overall character of a development. The

improvement of the sign aesthetics will implement the intent of Council to continue to improve the overall image of the South Westminster area. BY-LAW VARIANCES AND JUSTIFICATION (a) Requested Variance: To increase the number of fascia signs from one to four. Applicant's Reasons: The building is very large, and has minimal visibility from Scott Road or 124 Street. The increased number of fascia signs identifies the facilities available within the building. The fascia signage is stylized, and provides interest to the overall face of this large building. Staff Response: Staff concur with the rationale provided by the applicant. If this was a multi-tenant commercial or industrial building, one fascia sign per individual business would be allowed. Staff therefore support the proposed variance as each additional fascia sign identifies a different facility within the building. (b) Requested Variance: To increase the maximum fascia sign area of the combined fascia signs from 19.1 square metres (205.7 sq. ft.) to 51.4 square metres (553 sq. ft.). Applicant's Reasons: With the increased number of fascia signs, there is an increased combined fascia sign area which exceeds that permitted by the Sign By-law. Staff Comments: Staff support the increase in the number of fascia signs, and therefore support the requested variance to increase the maximum combined fascia sign area for the building. (c) Requested Variance: To permit one fascia sign to extend above the roof line of the building. Applicant's Reasons: The sign, with its supporting structure, was installed by the previous sign company. To re-configure the sign will require the removal of the sign, and moving it down the face of the building. The only parts of the sign that extend over the roof line are the "tines" of the "X" of Xcalibre. The cost of re-locating the sign is significant. Staff Response:

The definition of a "roof line" in the Sign By-law is the place where the wall of the building and the roof meet. While the tines of the "X" extend above this area, there is a small sloping roof behind the top of the sign. Although the sign was installed without a permit, the sign is stylized and unique for the business. Staff therefore support the requested variance. INFORMATION ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT The following information is attached to this Report: Appendix I. Lot Owners, Action Summary and Project Data Sheets Appendix II. Site Plan and Elevations from Development Permit No. 7996-0110 Appendix III. Proposed Free-Standing Sign Appendix IV. Development Variance Permit No. Appendix V. Engineering Comments INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON FILE Detailed Engineering Comments dated December 24, 2003. Soil Contamination Review Questionnaire prepared by Bill Goodwin and dated November 25, 2003. LAP/kms Murray Dinwoodie General Manager Planning and Development v:\wp-docs\planning\plncom04\01151040.lap.doc KMS 3/22/04 11:23 AM Information for City Clerk Legal Description and Owners of all lots that form part of the application: 1. (a) Agent: Name: Bill Goodwin c/o Galaxy Signs Address: 5085 Regent Street Burnaby, B.C. V6C 7B8 Tel: 604-580-2600 APPENDIX I 2. Properties involved in the Application (a) Civic Address: 12350 Pattullo Place (b) Civic Address: 12350 Pattullo Place Owner: 621870 B.C. Ltd.

PID: 023-529-687 Lot 1 Section 17 Block 5 North Range 2 West New Westminster District Plan LMP 30003 3. (a) Proceed to public notification of Development Variance Permit No. 7903-0406-00.