CIE4491 Lecture. Quantifying stormwater flow Rational method

Similar documents
Storm Sewer Design - Introduction

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to:

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to describe:

CIE4491 Sobek workshop feedback results

MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1. Precipitation

Use of IDF Curves Design of a roof drainage system

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E

ENGN.4010 ENGINEERING CAPSTONE DESIGN Watershed Analysis. CiA

Rational Method vs OTTHYMO, Comparing Peak Discharge Rates By Alex Nichols, P.Eng.

La Riereta Catchment Sant Boi de Llobregat

Report. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan Belle River Power Plant East China, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI

Report. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan St. Clair Power Plant St. Clair, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI

WASTEWATER & STORM WATER COLLECTION AND REMOVAL

Chapter 6. The Empirical version of the Rational Method

Flood hazard assessment in the Raval District of Barcelona using a 1D/2D coupled model

St. Boniface Industrial Park Phase 2 Municipal Servicing Report

The role of domestic rainwater harvesting systems in storm water runoff mitigation

Integrated Catchment Modelling

A Stormwater Management Plan and Sediment Control Plan are required for all proposed developments within the City of Richmond.

APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD

New Retirement Home 6758 & 6766 Rocque Street Orleans, Ontario

The Islamic University of Gaza- Civil Engineering Department Sanitary Engineering- ECIV 4325 L5. Storm water Management

Analysis and Simulation of Drainage Capacity of Urban Pipe Network

Storm Sewers, Page 2

Storm Sewer Design. Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg

Insights from editing the ARR Urban Book. Peter J Coombes

FORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview

APPENDIX E APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS

APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS

HY-12 User Manual. Aquaveo. Contents

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

HERPIC County Storm Drainage Manual

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. MSc CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER TWO EXAMINATION 2017/2018 URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS MODULE NO: BLT4022

Let Them Count An Argument for Inclusion of the Impact of. Household Rainwater Tanks When Designing an Urban Drainage. Network

Whole of Water Cycle Modelling Pilot Study

Design criteria, Flooding of sewer systems in flat areas.

Introduction. Keywords: Oil Palm, hydrology, HEC-HMS, HEC-RAS. a * b*

Stormwater Management Report Bachman Terrace Residential Development

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1

Section 600 Runoff Table of Contents

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Emerging Planning Approaches and Control Technologies

Runoff Calculations. Time of Concentration (T c or t c ) from one location to another within a watershed. Travel

Utilization of stormwater runoff models for flood control in Tokyo

FAST WATER / SLOW WATER AN EVALUATION OF ESTIMATING TIME FOR STORMWATER RUNOFF

Appendix I OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR STORMWATER DESIGN MANUAL 7/1/2008

Planning Considerations for Stormwater Management in Alberta. R. D. (Rick) Carnduff, M. Eng., P. Eng. February 20, 2013.

Storm Water Flood Modeling in the Sub-basin of Chennai Corporation, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India

WSUD On-site Detention in xprafts 2013

Simplification of dynamic flow routing models using hybrid modelling approaches two case studies

International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering, Science & Technology

RETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE

Hydrology Study. Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated)

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

Water supply components

CVEN 339 Summer 2009 Final Exam. 120 minutes allowed. 36 Students. No curve applied to grades. Median 70.6 Mean 68.7 Std. Dev High 88 Low 24.

SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL

Comparison of 1D-1D and 1D-2D urban flood models

STORM WATER REPORT. Proposed Row House Complex Clare and Hilson 566 Hilson Ave. & 148 Clare St. Ottawa, Ontario PREPARED FOR:

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

Sanitary Sewer Design. Sanitary Sewers, Page 1

Air pocket removal from downward sloping pipes

Index. Page numbers followed by f indicate figures.

Dynamic Inundation Mapping for Emergency Planning and Disaster Response

Water Quality Design Storms for Stormwater Hydrodynamic Separators

WinSLAMM v Program Modifications Final, 3/16/19

Applying the Water Quality Volume

STORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION

Introduction to Hydrology, Part 2. Notes, Handouts

DIVISION 5 STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA

Software Applications for Runoff Hydrological Assessment

Drainage Servicing Report - Terms of Reference

IBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project

1 Comments on Event Overview. 1 July Dr L McElhone Dunedin City Council P O Box 5045 Dunedin, awb Dear Laura

100-yr Design Runoff (cfs) Basin ID 103b A a B B C Totals

THE RATIONAL METHOD FREQUENTLY USED, OFTEN MISUSED

Using Sanitary Sewer I/I Field Data to Calibrate a Storm Sewer Model

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. MSc CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER TWO EXAMINATION 2015/2016 URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS MODULE NO: BLT4022

12d Solutions Pty Ltd CIVIL AND SURVEYING SOFTWARE

Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area

PRELIMINARY MUNICIPAL SERVICING REPORT NORTHWOODS SUBDIVISION. Prepared for: North Grassie Properties Inc.

Course: Wastewater Management

Rational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel COURSE CONTENT

New Retirement Home 6758 & 6766 Rocque Street Orleans, Ontario

STORM WATER REPORT ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PLANTS JINKINSON SIDE ROAD, ASHTON CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO PREPARED FOR:

Implementation of the methodology for climate change assessment for stormwater management in the Barcelona case study

WMS 8.4 Tutorial Storm Drain Modeling Storm Drain: Hydrographic Design Learn how to run sub-basin hydrographs through a storm drain network

WinSLAMM v Program Modifications Final, 12/12/17

Development of a Computer Model of a Drainage System with Uncertainties in External Inflow and Channel Cross-section

Introduction to Storm Sewer Design

Analysis of Runoff Reduction and Hydrologic Cycle Utilizing LID Concepts

CORFU project FLOOD HAZARD ASSESSMENT CONSIDERING CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS: APPLICATION TO BARCELONA CASE STUDY USING A 1D/2D DETAILED COUPLED MODEL

WMS 9.1 Tutorial Storm Drain Modeling Storm Drain: Hydrographic Design Learn how to run sub-basin hydrographs through a storm drain network

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

Modelling a Combined Sewage and Stormwater Flood Detention Basin

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT USING REMOTE SENSING AND GIS- A CASE STUDY OF SURAT CITY

Level 6 Graduate Diploma in Engineering Hydraulics and hydrology

Transcription:

CIE4491 Lecture. Quantifying stormwater flow Rational method 27-5-2014 Marie-claire ten Veldhuis, Watermanagement Department Delft University of Technology Challenge the future

Robust method stationary modelling IDF curves Storm event dynamic modelling Design storms Rainfall series dynamic modelling Standard rainfall series Rainfall runoff modelling Rainfall runoff modelling Rainfall runoff modelling Rational method Branched networks (few loops) Hydrodynamic model calculations Detailed branched and looped networks Hydrodynamic model calculations Simplified branched and looped networks Stationary hydraulic calculations Dynamic hydraulic calculations Dynamic hydraulic calculations Water levels in nodes Q-t diagram per node per storm event Q-t diagram per node for series of storm events 2

Rational method for stormwater drainage system design Rational method: Q t = C. I. A Q = inflow into manhole (m 3 /s) C = Runoff coefficient, representing runoff losses (-) I = rainfall intensity (mm/h or l/s/ha) A = catchment area connected to urban drainage system (m 2 ) 3

Rational method for stormwater drainage system design Rational method: Q t = C. I. A 1. Determine size and characteristics of subcatchment areas 2. Determine runoff coefficient C for subcatchment areas 3. Calculate concentration time at critical inflow points in drainage system 4. Determine critical rainfall intensity based on concentration time and IDF curve 5. Calculate Q at all critical inflow points 4

Runoff coefficient C: dependent on catchment type Flat roofs Inclined roofs Impervious area Pervious area 5

Inflow points 6

Contributing area per inflow point (manhole) 7

Catchment areas connected to sewer system Example: Bomenwijk Delft 8

Time of concentration Time required for surface runoff to flow from remotest part of catchment to inflow point under consideration Two components time of entry (t e ) time of flow (t f ) t t t c e f Return period (y) Time of entry (min) 1 4-8 2 4-7 3 3-6 9

Time of entry & time of flow In reality, time of entry varies with surface roughness slope & length of flow path rainfall intensity Time of flow depends on Hydraulic properties of pipe flow velocity Length of flow path 10

Rational method for urban drainage design Steady state stormwater flow: n n m m m 1 Q i C A Q n = flow at location with n upstream sections (l/s) i = critical rainfall intensity (l/s/ha (or mm/h)) for return period T and concentration time t C m = runoff coefficient of catchment discharging to section m A m = catchment area discharging to section m (ha) 11

Rational method Assumptions: Rainfall is uniform over the whole catchment area Catchment imperviousness remains constant throughout storm Flow in the system is at constant velocity throughout t c Steady state flow reached when t storm t c Critical rainfall intensity for at points in system at time t = t c 12

Rational method: stationary conditions Hydrograph response to continuous rainfall (graph b) 13

intensity (l/s.ha) Critical rainfall intensity 150 100 Intensity duration curve 50 i 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 t=t c duration (min) 14

Summary rational method for stormwater system design Choose return period of rainfall (T ) Estimate contributing areas for each pipe and run-off coefficient Assume flow velocity of 1 m/s Estimate maximum time of concentration (t c ) for connected catchment areas Read critical rainfall intensity from IDF curve Calculate flow rate in each pipe according to: n n m m m 1 Q i C A Adjust diameters of pipes if necessary Check flow velocity and concentration time 15

Example: calculate design flow for each node E D C B A + 5,95 m Surface water E + 4,95 m D + 4, C + 4,10 m+ 4,00 m B A + 3,00 m 500 m 300 m 400 m 200 m 16

Determine contributing area E D C B A Surface water 300 m 500 m 400 m 200 m Area A B C D E Area per node (ha) 0.5 2 4 5 3 Impervious area (%) 50 60 40 30 30 Impervious area per node (ha) Cum. Area per node (ha) 17

Determine contributing area E D C B A Surface water 300 m 500 m 400 m 200 m Area A B C D E Area per node (ha) 0.5 2 4 5 3 Impervious area (%) 50 60 40 30 30 Impervious area per node (ha) 0.25 1.2 1.6 1.5 0.9 Cum. Area per node (ha) 5.45 5.2 4.5 2.4 0.9 18

Time of concentration Surface water E D C B A 300 m 500 m 400 m 200 m Assume flow velocity 1 m/s Area A B C D E Time of concentration (min) 19

Time of concentration Surface water E D C B A 300 m 500 m 400 m 200 m Assume flow velocity 1 m/s Area A B C D E Time of concentration (min) 29 28 25 18.3 10 20

intensity (l/s.ha) Critical rainfall intensities from IDF curve Area A B C D E Time of concentration (min) 29 28 25 18.3 10 Rainfall intensity (l/s/ha) 40 40 45 50 70 150 100 60 50 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 duration (min) 21

Design flow for each node Area A B C D E Time of concentration (min) 29 28 25 18.3 10 Rainfall intensity (l/s/ha) 40 40 45 50 70 Cumulative area (ha) 5.45 5.2 4.5 2.4 0.9 Design flow (l/s) 218 208 202 120 63 Surface water E D C B A 300 m 500 m 400 m 200 m 22

Rainwater flow, remember: Precipitation on 24 August 2002, Prinsenbeek 8 120 Highly variable (0 extreme): no system can cope with all possible rainfall intensities 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 250 100 80 60 40 20 0 High rainfall intensity is critical 200 Stormwater flow is large compared to wastewater flow Translation into design values : statistics and assumptions neerslag [l/s.ha] 150 100 50 0 10 00:00:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Precipitation in mm/10min Cumulative precipitation volume (mm) 20 00:05:00 30 00:10:00 40 00:15:00 50 00:20:00 70 00:25:00 90 00:30:00 110 110 00:35:00 00:40:00 70 00:45:00 40 00:50:00 20 00:55:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00:00 01:05:00 01:10:00 01:15:00 01:20:00 01:25:00 01:30:00 23