Pollution Prevention Appendix W: Solid and Hazardous Waste

Similar documents
Appendix V: Solid and Hazardous Waste

Appendix W: Solid and Hazardous Waste

5 Pollution Prevention

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Sustainable Materials Management Solid Waste Diversion

DoD Solid Waste Diversion

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

Final Plan DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) STRATEGIC MATERIALS

Introduction. Background

Pollution Prevention Plan

Army Reserve Solid Waste Program Review

SUSTAINABILITY REPORT

Appendix T: Water Quality

TRASH REDUCTION PLAN Storm Water Management Plan

Progress and Barriers to Becoming Net Zero

Just the Facts and the Data

Top 10 Ways EPA Uses the Principles of Sustainability to Accomplish Its Mission

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

Waste Management in Building and Construction Projects

Sustainability Action Planning and Initiatives at Twentynine Palms Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC) May 2011

Army Net Zero Installation Initiative and Cost Benefit Analysis Activity

6Compliance. Reduce compliance costs. Plan, program, budget, and execute projects and activities that facilitate compliance

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Appendix C: Conservation Budget Overview

2015 SOLID WASTE ANNUAL REPORT

NEWMOA & NERC Joint Strategic Action Plan Working Together on Sustainable Materials Management

Introduction and Objective. Step 1. Step 2 Process material collected in Step 1.

Mecklenburg County Solid Waste Management Plan Public Meeting Tuesday, April 17 th

Del Norte Regional Recycling and Transfer Station Progress Report. November 15, 2016

Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board

Military Adaptation to Climate Change. Ms. Ninette Sadusky. International Policy Advisor

Department of Defense DoD Progress in Environmental Liabilities Reporting

Fort Campbell Sustainability Program Update

15 Pollution prevention in the U.S. Defense Department

Reliability Survey of Military Acquisition Systems

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS *************************************************************************** SECTION

Common Errors to Avoid in EPCRA Reporting

Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

NAVAL STATION ROTA SPAIN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AWARD OVERSEAS INSTALLATION

Boulder County Comprehensive Plan DRAFT -- Sustainable Materials Management Element

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

City of San Clemente Building Permit Applicants. Construction & Demolition Debris Recycling Requirements

Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Scope of Work CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE RECYCLING AND WASTE REDUCTION PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS Consent Calendar 3 - Attachment 2

Objective WM1 To reduce waste and waste disposal by promoting waste diversion and other Zero Waste initiatives

Refuse Collections Utility Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

CRS Issue Statement on Environmental Cleanup and Waste Management

objective: to ensure our nation can afford the systems it acquires.

Raytheon Sustainability and Water Conservation

Organic PBL. Bruce Hatlem. PBL Performance Learning Director (PLD) Learning Capabilities Integration Center (LCIC)

Environmental, Occupational

Nomination Packet Requirements and Format

Federal Acquisition Service

ASTSWMO Mid-Year Meeting May Betsy Smidinger, Acting Director Resource Conservation and Sustainability Division ORCR/OSWER/U.S.

USAG Fort Buchanan Sustainability and Environmental Management System (SEMS) Training for Environmental Compliance Officers (ECOs)

Jeff Mathieu Tetra Tech, Inc

1. Executive Summary. CRRA Transition Plan

DLA Aging Systems Program: Technology Investment for Sustainment. Cliff Wolfe Program Manager DSCR-VE March 2005

6.20 UTILITIES SOLID WASTE

More And Better Recycling for a Circular Economy the EU in Action

SUBJECT: Joint Physical Inventory Working Group (JPIWG) Meeting, September 28, 2010

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Pollution Prevention (P2) Program

POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR MARINE CORPS AIR STATION MIRAMAR SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

MCAS Yuma 1 INTRODUCTION

PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION COATINGS, POWDER (METRIC)

Logistics Solutions for the Warfighter

Approaching Net Zero

Winning the Procure-to-Pay Battle

Introduction: Background:

NATIONAL WASTE STREAM PROFILES

Sustainability Performance Report

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM

POLLUTION PREVENTION INTRODUCTION HIGHLIGHTS OF ACTIVITIES IN FISCAL YEAR Affirmative Procurement

Tompkins County Solid Waste Management Plan Executive Summary

A Message from the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness

CALENDAR YEAR 2002 TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY INTRODUCTION 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS 59

Assembly Goal 2017: Ensure that Juneau has a functioning local solid waste disposal option into the future.

Sustainability Plan 2015 Update

DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS FIVE YEAR UPDATE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2007

NADAFA Program. Permitting of Development & Infrastructure Projects. By: Mr. Jamal Al Jeetawy & Dr. Jayesh Panchal

Applying Innovation to Improve Logistics Performance and Reduce Costs

GREEN. The Navy s efforts to identify and procure environmentally-friendly. Buying NAVY AWASH IN GREEN PROCUREMENT

Sustainability Goals. Appendix F - DRAFT 1

1 / Consultant s Perspective & Role

Navy Region Southwest CONVERSION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT

Draft Rate Application. Funding the SF Recycling Program and Pursuing Zero Waste by 2020

Construction and Demolition Waste Management at UVM

One of the most important activities in the Production and Deployment phase is Test and

Twentynine Palms Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC)

Materials Management and Climate Change. An Introduction

The Economic Benefits of Recycling WasteWise Case Studies from the Private and Public Sectors

n. Memorandum, ASA(IE&E), 24 Aug 2012, subject: Energy Goal Attainment Responsibility Policy for Installations.

CITY OF RIO VISTA Construction and Demolition Waste Management Plan and Disposal Report

INTRODUCTION. INLS Causeway Ferry off loading activities at MCSF-BI

AFFIRMATIVE PROCUREMENT (Buy Recycled) PROGRAM. Ms. Doenee Moscato US Army Environmental Center (410)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Waste Disposal Stream Analysis

Zero Waste Planning to Climate Change. CRRA Annual Conference. August 22, 2017

Sustainability: Asking Everyone to Plan for the Future

ADDITIONS & DELETIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Transcription:

The Department of Defense (DoD) consistently places a strong emphasis on pollution prevention and source reduction. Recent efforts have been focused on taking additional steps to reduce the amount of solid and hazardous waste entering the waste stream. DoD is committed to accomplishing waste reduction goals through integrated solutions including reducing generation of wastes and increasing the diversion of materials. Improved management and promotion of additional recycling opportunities will support these reduction goals, and lessen future cleanup costs related to processing items from an installation or facility s waste stream. Integrated Solid Waste Management Integrated solid waste management programs have been employed throughout DoD to enable managers to make more effective waste diversion or disposal decisions based on improved environmental management practices. These practices promote waste diversion success at installations through a comprehensive approach encompassing waste prevention, recycling, composting, and disposal programs. DoD demonstrated commitment to increasing diversion of non-hazardous solid wastes in 1998, with a solid waste diversion rate goal of 4 percent or greater by the end of (CY). DoD established the total solid waste diversion rate metric to support goals for diversion and to calculate the rate at which installations prevent non-hazardous municipal solid waste from entering a disposal facility. This goal was met in (FY) 21 when DoD s solid waste diversion rate reached 45 percent. In FY, DoD revised the solid waste reporting metric to separately identify construction and demolition (C&D) debris and municipal solid waste diversion rates. DoD continues to integrate solid waste management practices to enhance and sustain mission readiness, comply with requirements, and reduce resource consumption. DoD is currently developing strong initiatives in response to the requirements in Executive Order 13423, entitled Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management. These new requirements will help ensure that the Department sets proper goals to reduce the quantity of toxic and hazardous chemicals and materials acquired, used, or disposed of; increase diversion of solid waste; and maintain cost-effective waste prevention and recycling programs in its facilities. Hazardous Waste Reduction and Disposal DoD has sustained a strong dedication to reducing hazardous waste with a 5 percent decrease in the total amount of hazardous waste disposed since CY1996. The hazardous waste reduction rate is calculated as a calendar year metric and includes hazardous waste that is shipped off site, treated on site, and shipped off-site overseas. DoD has a waste management approach where pollution prevention is the first choice in achieving compliance. Pollution prevention is also incorporated into all phases of the weapons system lifecycle development. DoD emphasizes the environmental hierarchy of source reduction of pollutants, reuse and recycling, treatment, and then disposal. Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress W-1

DoD The Department demonstrates a strong commitment to protecting human health and the environment, through a sustained focus on diverting non-hazardous solid waste from entering disposal facilities and reducing disposal of hazardous waste. Each year, the percentage of solid waste diverted varies depending on the amount, location, and types of solid waste generated. DoD s C&D solid waste diversion rate is also dependent on the schedule for construction, demolition, and renovation projects which produce large quantities of C&D debris. DoD generated a total of 5.9 million tons of solid waste, consisting of 3.4 million tons of C&D debris and 2.5 million tons of non-hazardous municipal solid waste in FY. The generation of municipal solid waste equates to 3.5 pounds per person per day. As shown in Figure W-1, the Department had an overall diversion rate of 6 percent in FY. This includes diversion rates of 76 percent for C&D debris and 39 percent for non-hazardous municipal solid waste. Through efforts to divert solid waste, DoD has not only met but exceeded agency goals of land resource management by reducing the flow of waste, therefore extending the lives of the landfills. Achievement of solid waste program goals through integrated solid waste management practices has also led to a cost avoidance of $18 million through a reduction in the amount of solid waste and C&D debris received by landfills or incinerators and the associated costs. In CY, DoD reduced hazardous waste disposal to just over 142 million pounds of hazardous waste, as illustrated in Figure W-2. This reduction is largely due to continual efforts throughout the Department to identify opportunities for reducing hazardous waste generation. Reduction and elimination of the use of hazardous materials will decrease health risks to personnel and reduce the number of accidents that can occur when using these materials and any associated cleanup costs. Figure W-1 DoD Solid Waste Diversion Rate 6 6 54% 55% Figure W-2 DoD 3 286.6 219.8 28.2 2 178.3 156.4 154.8 146.6 136.4 128.2 126.7 1 1996 1997 1998 2 21 22 23 142.2 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress W-2

Army To face the many challenges associated with waste management, the Army has effectively maintained its solid and hazardous waste reduction programs, realizing successes through regulatory compliance and economic benefit. According to Figure W-3, diversion accounted for 65 percent of all Army solid waste disposal in FY. The Army effectively demonstrated commitment to solid waste reduction in C&D processes, with 79 percent of this debris from landfills diverted into productive reuse. In addition, the Army diverted 4 percent of non-hazardous municipal solid waste from entering the waste stream. The Army s efforts to divert waste from landfills and incinerators have resulted in an avoidance of $15 million in solid waste disposal costs. The qualified recycling program posted gross revenues of $24 million. Most of these proceeds went toward operation and improvement of the program. Figure W-3 Army Solid Waste Diversion Rate 57% Figure W-4 Army 75 46% 59% 65% The Army disposed of over 45 million pounds of hazardous waste in CY, as shown in Figure W-4. This amount represents an increase in hazardous waste disposal for the Army compared to CY1996. The Army achieved a 29 percent reduction in overall hazardous waste disposal since CY, indicating a strong commitment to protecting human health and the environment through hazardous waste program initiatives. 5 25 43.8 1996 35.2 1997 31.7 1998 4.2 55.2 4.4 36.1 2 21 22 33.4 23 45.7 63.7 45. Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress W-3

Navy The Navy has made very strong efforts to promote human health and the environment through initiatives that strictly comply with DoD and Navy policies regarding solid and hazardous waste management. In FY, the Navy achieved an overall diversion rate of 51 percent through integrated solid waste management practices, illustrated in Figure W-5. The Navy effectively accomplished this reduction through a 71 percent diversion of C&D debris and a 31 percent diversion of non-hazardous municipal solid waste. Effective solid waste diversion practices resulted in a cost savings for the Navy of over $24 million in FY. Figure W-5 Navy Solid Waste Diversion Rate 42% 49% 6 51% The Navy s progress in reducing hazardous waste disposal is demonstrated through a reduction rate of 57 percent since CY1996. In CY, the Navy disposed of 6.5 million pounds of hazardous waste, as shown in Figure W-6. This total is comprised of over 49.1 million pounds of hazardous wastes shipped off and on site in the U.S., and over 11.4 million pounds of hazardous wastes shipped offsite to overseas installations. Figure W-6 Navy 15 139.1 1 9. 79.4 5 1996 1997 1998 8.5 65.6 61.4 59.3 58.6 2 21 22 23 55. 54.1 6.5 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress W-4

Marine Corps The Marine Corps consistently demonstrates excellence in achievement of DoD s solid and hazardous waste reduction goals and a strong commitment to diversion and reduction of materials from the waste stream. The Marine Corps achieved a 4 percent diversion rate of all solid waste, as shown in Figure W-7. In FY, the Marine Corps diverted 5 percent of C&D debris and 36 percent of non-hazardous municipal solid waste from entering the waste stream. Changes in the FY diversion rate are due to data reporting corrections of C&D debris at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. The Marine Corps demonstrated further achievement in hazardous waste reduction with a 75 percent decrease in the total amount of hazardous waste disposal since CY1996. As shown in Figure W-8, the Marine Corps disposed of 18.6 million pounds of hazardous waste in CY. Figure W-7 Marine Corps Solid Waste Diversion Rate 28% Figure W-8 Marine Corps 1 33% 4 75 5 25 75.1 1996 64.9 1997 75.1 1998 38. 25.8 14.6 14.2 14.8 13.9 2 21 22 23 16.4 18.6 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress W-5

Air Force The Air Force continues to promote solid and hazardous waste management by diverting large amounts of non-hazardous municipal solid waste from landfills, recycling wastes that could potentially be hazardous, and preventing waste at its source through the implementation of broad acquisition and supply programs to procure more environmentally preferable products. Figure W-9 Air Force Solid Waste Diversion Rate 1 64% 76% 64% 62% Effective diversion of waste from landfills and incinerators has allowed the Air Force to avoid over $45 million in solid waste disposal costs in FY. This savings is a result of 74 percent of C&D debris and 45 percent of non-hazardous municipal solid waste that was diverted from all disposal facilities in FY. As shown in Figure W-9, the Air Force had an overall diversion rate of 62 percent. Since CY1996, the Air Force has engaged in many successful initiatives which have resulted in a 33 percent reduction of hazardous waste disposal. Effective implementation of shelf-life management and leaning of processes have reduced the amount of hazardous waste disposed of, leading to improved operations and a decrease in occupational and environmental risks. Figure W-1 illustrates progress with regard to hazardous solid waste diversion and cost avoidance, with a total disposal in CY of 16.8 million pounds of hazardous waste. Figure W-1 Air Force 3 25. 21.5 2.8 19.4 2 1 1996 1997 1998 2.2 18.8 18.4 2 21 22 19.8 23 21.1 2.3 16.8 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress W-6

DLA DLA is a champion of DoD s solid and hazardous waste reduction and diversion through consistent efforts and accomplishment of goals, resulting in greater protection of human health and the environment. In FY, DLA achieved DoD s 4 percent solid waste reduction goal, with a 56 percent reduction rate, as shown in Figure W-11. Diversion decreased compared to FY because a large demolition project allowed DLA to divert a significant quantity of C&D. DLA also reduced the amount of C&D wastes disposed of, with a 67 percent diversion rate in FY, and a 55 percent diversion rate for municipal solid waste. Figure W-11 DLA Solid Waste Diversion Rate 1 81% 47% 86% 56% Figure W-12 demonstrates DLA s tremendous hazardous waste program achievement, reducing hazardous waste disposal by 68 percent since CY1996 including waste disposed of by the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service with 1.2 million pounds disposed of in CY. DLA s reduction rates not only demonstrate a strong compliance with federal and DoD hazardous waste standards, but a reduction in occupational and environmental risk among all DLA installations. Figure W-12 DLA 9 8.1 6 3.6 3 1.3 1996 1997 1998.3.8.3.2.1 2 21 22 23.7.4 1.2 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress W-7