Appendix V: Solid and Hazardous Waste

Similar documents
Pollution Prevention Appendix W: Solid and Hazardous Waste

Appendix W: Solid and Hazardous Waste

5 Pollution Prevention

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Sustainable Materials Management Solid Waste Diversion

Introduction. Background

Appendix T: Water Quality

DoD Solid Waste Diversion

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

Appendix C: Conservation Budget Overview

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

Final Plan DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) STRATEGIC MATERIALS

TRASH REDUCTION PLAN Storm Water Management Plan

Pollution Prevention Plan

Introduction: Background:

Army Reserve Solid Waste Program Review

CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

SUSTAINABILITY REPORT

6Compliance. Reduce compliance costs. Plan, program, budget, and execute projects and activities that facilitate compliance

Logistics Solutions for the Warfighter

Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Introduction and Objective. Step 1. Step 2 Process material collected in Step 1.

Military Adaptation to Climate Change. Ms. Ninette Sadusky. International Policy Advisor

Department of Defense DoD Progress in Environmental Liabilities Reporting

A Message from the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness

Just the Facts and the Data

Refuse Collections Utility Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Mecklenburg County Solid Waste Management Plan Public Meeting Tuesday, April 17 th

NAVAL STATION ROTA SPAIN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AWARD OVERSEAS INSTALLATION

Federal Acquisition Service

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM

Del Norte Regional Recycling and Transfer Station Progress Report. November 15, 2016

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Sustainability Action Planning and Initiatives at Twentynine Palms Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC) May 2011

SUBPART ACQUISITION PLANS (Revised January 10, 2008)

Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

DOD Methodology for the Valuation of Excess, Obsolete, and Unserviceable Inventory and Operating Materials and Supplies

Top 10 Ways EPA Uses the Principles of Sustainability to Accomplish Its Mission

WM2012 Conference, February 26 March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Hanford Site Sustainability Program, Richland, Washington 12464

2015 SOLID WASTE ANNUAL REPORT

objective: to ensure our nation can afford the systems it acquires.

15 Pollution prevention in the U.S. Defense Department

EO & GSA S STRATEGIC SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE PLAN

LMP Department of Defense Maintenance Symposium & Exhibition. Logistics Modernization Program

Army Net Zero Installation Initiative and Cost Benefit Analysis Activity

Raytheon Sustainability and Water Conservation

Partnering for Warfighter Readiness

Progress and Barriers to Becoming Net Zero

n. Memorandum, ASA(IE&E), 24 Aug 2012, subject: Energy Goal Attainment Responsibility Policy for Installations.

Winning the Procure-to-Pay Battle

Logistics Community of Interest 1670 Equipment Services Series Competency-Based Learning Map and Training Strategy

Environmental Services

Waste Management in Building and Construction Projects

DOD MANUAL , VOLUME 10 DOD SUPPLY CHAIN MATERIEL MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES: SUPPLY CHAIN INVENTORY REPORTING AND METRICS

This training matters, because the auditors are coming.

Logistics Community of Interest 2001 General Supply Series Competency-Based Learning Map and Training Strategy. Page 1

ADDITIONS & DELETIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2005 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY DEFENSE WIDE RDT&E BA 6

Applying Innovation to Improve Logistics Performance and Reduce Costs

SRP CONSERVATION & STEWARDSHIP REPORT 2016

Logistics Community of Interest 0346 Logistics Management Series Competency-Based Learning Map and Training Strategy. Page 1

6.20 UTILITIES SOLID WASTE

APPA AWARD SUBMISSION UNC Charlotte

PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION COATINGS, POWDER (METRIC)

Defense Acquisition Workforce Key Information OVERALL As of FY17Q3 (30 June 2017)

Organic PBL. Bruce Hatlem. PBL Performance Learning Director (PLD) Learning Capabilities Integration Center (LCIC)

Total Ownership Costs. Affordability from an Industry Perspective. Jim O Neill VP/GM Integrated Logistics Global Services & Support

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS *************************************************************************** SECTION

Fort Campbell Sustainability Program Update

Selecting a Temporary Debris Management Site for Effective Debris Removal

11th Annual Systems Engineering Conference. Reduction of Total Ownership Costs (R-TOC) and Value Engineering (VE) in the Defense System s Life Cycle

FY Budget Presentation Department of Environmental Services

City of San Clemente Building Permit Applicants. Construction & Demolition Debris Recycling Requirements

The leading parts and logistics management system.

POLLUTION PREVENTION INTRODUCTION HIGHLIGHTS OF ACTIVITIES IN FISCAL YEAR Affirmative Procurement

Recycling Resources. Reducing Waste

ATTACHMENT TO ADC 474 New MRA Discrepancy Indicator Code (STAFFED AS PDC 464)

USACE Environmental Support to the Army and the Nation

Quarterly Performance Measurement Report

SUBMITTAL FOR 2004 SECRETARY OF NAVY DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INDUSTRIAL INSTALLATION

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY HEADQUARTERS 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 2206()..6221

Reliability Survey of Military Acquisition Systems

The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) is a combat support agency

DOD Maintenance Symposium Diagnosing, Assessing, & Applying Throughout the Life Cycle Presented by: Yvonne Romero, MCSC

ASTSWMO Mid-Year Meeting May Betsy Smidinger, Acting Director Resource Conservation and Sustainability Division ORCR/OSWER/U.S.

1. ORIGINATING SERVICE/AGENCY AND POC INFORMATION: a. Service/Agency: Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Disposition Services

NORTH CAROLINA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

Environmental, Occupational

MANAGING DISCARDS IN AN EMERGING CIRCULAR ECONOMY. Michigan Recycling Coalition 2016 Annual Conference

Forge 101 An Introduction to Forge.mil SoftwareForge Document ID doc15935

Sustainability Performance Report

CITY OF RIO VISTA Construction and Demolition Waste Management Plan and Disposal Report

MCAS Yuma 1 INTRODUCTION

NAVAIR PMA-231 FY10 Sustainability Team Nomination 1

INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND

DEFENSE INVENTORY. Services Generally Have Reduced Excess Inventory, but Additional Actions Are Needed

Scope of Work CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE RECYCLING AND WASTE REDUCTION PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS Consent Calendar 3 - Attachment 2

Waste FY Introduction. 2. Waste. 3. Management Approach

Transcription:

Appendix V: The Department of Defense (DoD) has demonstrated a strong commitment to reducing the amount of solid and hazardous waste entering the waste stream. DoD employs integrated solutions with a focus on reducing waste generation and increasing the diversion of materials from the waste stream through better management and recycling whenever feasible and cost effective. These program efforts not only reduce the amount of waste entering landfills or incinerators, but lessen future cleanup costs and requirements by minimizing the asset footprint required to manage solid and hazardous materials over the lifecycles of weapon systems. Integrated solid waste management practices have been developed and employed throughout the Department based on DoD policies to enhance and sustain mission readiness through cost-effective acquisition that achieves compliance and reduces resource consumption. In 1998, DoD set a solid waste diversion rate goal of 4 percent or greater by the end of (CY) 25 in response to solid waste diversion requirements in Executive Order 1311, entitled Greening the Government Through Waste Prevention, Recycling, and Federal Acquisition. DoD established the total solid waste diversion rate metric to support goals for diversion and to calculate the rate at which installations prevent non-hazardous municipal solid waste from entering a disposal facility. This goal was met in Fiscal Year (FY) 21 when DoD s solid waste diversion rate reached 45 percent, as shown in Figure V-1. In FY25, DoD revised the solid waste reporting metric to separately identify construction and demolition (C&D) debris and municipal solid waste diversion rates. DoD continues to integrate solid waste management practices throughout the Department to enhance and sustain mission readiness. This meets compliance requirements and reduces resource consumption. Due to varying recycling markets around the country, the percentage of solid waste diverted in a year varies depending on the amount, location, and types of solid waste generated. DoD s C&D solid waste diversion rate is also dependent on the schedule for construction, demolition, and renovation projects, which produce large quantities of C&D debris. In FY26, DoD generated a total of 6.3 million tons of solid waste, consisting of 3.6 million tons of C&D debris and 2.7 million tons of non-hazardous municipal solid waste. The generation of municipal solid waste equates to 3.8 pounds per person per day. As shown in Figure V-1, the Department had an overall diversion rate of 6 percent in FY26. This includes diversion rates of Percent Solid Waste Diverted % 4% 3% 2% 1% % 35% 1999 39% 2 Figure V-1 DoD Solid Waste Diversion Rate 45% 21 49% 22 47% 23 Fiscal Year 54% 55% 24 25 26 V-1

75 percent for C&D debris and 4 percent for non-hazardous municipal solid waste. Figure V-2 shows the amounts of solid waste generated and diverted, and percent diverted by DoD Components in FY26. Through efforts to divert solid waste, DoD has not only met, but exceeded agency goals of land resource management by reducing the flow of waste, and therefore extending the lives of the landfills. Achievement of solid waste program goals through integrated solid waste management practices has also led to a cost avoidance of over $16 million, through a reduction in the amount of solid waste and C&D debris received by a landfill or incinerator and the associated costs. DoD has sustained a strong dedication to reducing hazardous waste with a 62 percent decrease in the total amount of hazardous waste disposed since CY1995. Hazardous waste data are collected as a calendar year metric. As shown in Figure V-3, DoD s hazardous waste reduction efforts prevented over 132 million pounds of hazardous waste disposal in CY25. This reduction is largely due to continual efforts throughout the Department to identify opportunities for reducing hazardous waste generation. Through reduction and elimination of the use of hazardous materials, DoD is able to decrease health risks to personnel and reduce the number of accidents that can occur when using these materials and any associated cleanup costs. Army Thousands of Tons 3 3 2 2 1 1 345.4 286.6 59% Army Navy MC Solid Waste and C&D Generated Figure V-2 FY26 Solid Waste Diversion 41% Component AF 64% Figure V-3 DoD DLA 86% Solid Waste and C&D Diverted To face the many challenges associated with waste management, the Army has effectively maintained its solid and hazardous waste reduction programs, realizing successes through regulatory compliance and economic benefit. According to Figure V-2, diversion accounted for 59 percent of all Army solid waste disposal in FY26. The Army effectively demonstrated commitment to solid waste reduction in C&D processes, with 72 percent of this debris from landfills diverted into productive reuse and 43 percent of non-hazardous municipal solid waste. The Army s efforts to divert waste from landfills and incinerators have resulted in an avoidance of over $74 million in solid waste disposal costs. The qualified recycling program posted gross revenues of $2.9 2 2 1 1 219.8 28.2 178.3 156.4 146.6 128.2 126.7 136.4 132.4 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 V-2

million. Most of these proceeds went toward operation and improvement of the program. The Army disposed of over 37 million pounds of hazardous waste in CY25, as shown in Figure V-4. This amount represents a decrease in hazardous waste disposal for the Army, demonstrating success in hazardous waste program initiatives. The Army achieved a nine percent reduction in overall hazardous waste disposal since CY1995, indicating a strong commitment to protecting human health and the environment through hazardous waste program initiatives. 6 4 3 2 41.2 43.8 35.2 Figure V-4 Army 31.7 4.2 55.2 4.4 36.1 33.4 45.7 37.5 Navy 1 To decrease risks to human health and the environment, the Navy has strictly complied with DoD and Department of Navy policies regarding solid and hazardous waste management. 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 In FY26, the Navy achieved an overall diversion rate of 6 percent through the implementation of integrated solid waste management practices, as seen in Figure V-2. The Navy effectively accomplished this reduction through a 78 percent diversion of C&D debris and a 27 percent diversion of non-hazardous municipal solid waste. The Navy has accomplished significant progress in hazardous waste disposal through a reduction rate of 68 percent since CY1995. In CY25, the Navy disposed of 58.2 million pounds of hazardous waste, as shown in Figure V-5. Marine Corps 2 1 1 18.9 139.1 9. Figure V-5 Navy 79.4 8.5 65.6 61.4 59.3 58.6 55. 58.2 Through consistent accomplishment of DoD s solid and hazardous waste reduction goals, the Marine Corps has shown a long-term commitment to diversion and reduction of materials from the waste stream. 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 V-3

The Marine Corps achieved a 41 percent diversion rate of all solid waste, as shown in Figure V-2. In FY26, the Marine Corps successfully diverted 64 percent of C&D debris and 28 percent of non-hazardous municipal solid waste from entering the waste stream. 8 7 78.7 75.1 Figure V-6 Marine Corps 64.9 75.1 The Marine Corps achieved further success in hazardous waste reduction with a 79 percent decrease in the total amount of hazardous waste disposal since CY1995. According to Figure V-6, the Marine Corps disposed of 16.8 million pounds of hazardous waste in CY25. Air Force 6 4 3 2 1 38. 25.8 14.6 14.2 14.8 13.9 16.8 The Air Force has demonstrated dedication to solid and hazardous waste management by diverting large amounts of non-hazardous municipal solid waste from landfills, recycling wastes that could potentially be hazardous, and preventing waste at its source through the implementation of broad acquisition and supply programs to procure more environmentally preferable products. Effective diversion of waste from landfills and incinerators has allowed the Air Force to avoid over $4 million in solid waste disposal costs in FY26. In FY26, 76 percent of C&D debris and 48 percent of non-hazardous municipal solid waste was diverted from all disposal facilities. As shown in Figure V-2, the Air Force had an overall diversion rate of 64 percent. Successful efforts by Air Force weapons systems engineers and maintainers and the logistics community have resulted in a 37 percent reduction of hazardous waste disposal since CY1995. The Air Force s implementation of shelf-life management and leaning of processes have reduced the amount of hazardous waste disposed of, resulting in improved operations and a decrease in occupational and environmental risks. Figure V-7 illustrates progress with 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 31. 25. 21.5 Figure V-7 Air Force 2.8 19.4 2.2 18.8 18.4 19.8 21.1 19.6 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 V-4

regard to hazardous solid waste diversion and cost avoidance, with a total disposal in CY25 of 19.6 million pounds of hazardous waste. DLA Through successful program implementation, DLA has consistently achieved and exceeded DoD s solid and hazardous waste reduction and diversion goals, resulting in greater protection of human health and the environment. In FY26, DLA surpassed DoD s 4 percent solid waste reduction goal with an 86 percent diversion from disposal facilities, as shown in Figure V-2. DLA also exhibited dedication to the reduction of C&D wastes, with a 96 percent diversion rate in FY26 and a 45 percent diversion rate for municipal solid waste. The success of DLA s solid waste reduction program has not only reduced the amount of wastes entering landfills, but has also produced an economic benefit of $7,. Figure V-8 shows DLA s tremendous hazardous waste program achievement of a 97 percent reduction in hazardous waste disposal since CY1995, which includes waste disposed by the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service (DRMS); with only.4 million pounds disposed of in CY25. DLA achieved a 71 percent reduction in hazardous waste disposal since CY1998, which does not include waste disposed by DRMS. These reduction rates not only demonstrate a strong compliance with federal and DoD hazardous waste standards, but a reduction in occupational and environmental risk among all DLA installations. 15 12 9 6 3 13.7 3.6 8.1 Figure V-8 DLA 1.3.3.8 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25.3.2.1.7.4 V-5