Background. Literature Review

Similar documents
FEDERAL WETLANDS PERSPECTIVE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY REGULATORY PROGRAM

SECTION 3 NATURAL RESOURCES

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

Riparian Setback- What is that and what should I be doing? October 25th, 2016 Presented by: Anil Tangirala, PE, CFM, ENV SP

Prepared by: Rummel, Klepper & Kahl

The Clean Water Act Waters of the US Proposed Rule -- What is it and what are the implications for agriculture?

INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Instructions for Notice of Ground Disturbance Form:

5.15 Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S.

I THOUGHT IT WAS JUST WET LAND: A GUIDE TO ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING FOR AIRPORTS ROAD SCHOOL 2018 SIMON DAVIES, SENIOR SCIENTIST MARCH 7, 2018

SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACTS ANALYSIS

Corps Regulatory Program Jurisdiction and Permits

Snitz Creek Park Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering District 8-0

Waters of the U.S. Revisions


PROSPECTUS. Proposed Beech River Canal Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank

CORPS REGULATORY PROGRAM

NAR Fact Sheet Proposed Changes to Clean Water Act Regulations

CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP Chapter 290: WATERSHED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article IV: Stormwater Management

The Big Picture SOILS, WETLANDS AND DEVELOPMENT SOILS OVERVIEW BRUCE BARBER. PWS, Soil Scientist Certified Ecologist CORNERSTONE ASSOCIATES

Wetlands. DuPage County Stormwater Ordinance Update- Wetlands and Buffers. Is a Stormwater Permit Required? 7/13/2012

3D WETLAND MANAGEMENT

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

TORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

PRESENTERS. Contact Information: RW Armstrong Union Station, 300 S. Meridian St. Indianapolis, IN

Project Information. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S. Code 1344), notice is hereby given that

Surface Water and Non-Wetland Surface Waters Delineation and Classification pursuant Chapter F.A.C.

Waters of the United States. National Conference of State Legislatures August 20, 2014 Virginia S. Albrecht

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA


Environmental Resource Inventories. What are ERIs? Significance of information How to use them

Wetland Identification/Delineation and Bog Turtle Habitat Screening Report for. S.R. 0097, Section 003 Two Taverns Bridge Replacement over Littles Run

Project Information. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S. Code 1344), notice is hereby given that

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY

US ARMY CORPS Reply To: Public Notice No. OF ENGINEERS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P-3109

Resource Protection Areas: Nontidal Wetlands Guidance on the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Designation and Management Regulations June 18, 2007

The Clean Water Act. Clarifies protection under the Clean Water Act for streams and wetlands

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Regulatory Branch Program Overview

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Galveston District

Water for Virginia Master Naturalists. What are the types What is important to know about: Functions Values Issues

Pennichuck Brook Watershed Buildout Analysis December 2003

Whatcom County Code Chapter Critical Areas Regulations: Wetlands, Streams, and Wildlife

Public Notice. Latitude: N Longitude: W 7.5 Minute Quad: Lebanon Junction

Municipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates VNH File No.

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Question 13: Wetlands

Department of the Army Permit Application

Public Input Meeting. Proposed Central New York Wetland Mitigation Bank. March 20, 2017

BASIS OF REVIEW SITE PLAN REVIEW

CROSBY BROOK RESTORATION STUDY BRATTLEBORO, VT

Maine s Land Use Regulations and Erosion Control Techniques

::no::

FLOODPLAIN PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

Regulatory Program. SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): March 04, 2019

An Introduction to the Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program

PUBLIC NOTICE Creedmoor Road, Suite 122 Raleigh, North Carolina 27613

Public Notice.

CESAM-RD-N April 30, 2015 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. SAM JSC

Version Isolated & Non-Waters Only 1 of 3

CESAM-RD-N January 21, 2016 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. SAM JSC

Re: Slate Belt Heat Recovery Center proposal, Plainfield Twp., Northampton County, PA

Appendix C-3. Wetlands and Other Surface Waters Report

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Regulatory Program: Emergency Stream Restoration

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

Regulatory Program. SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (AJD): 20 September 2018

WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED WATERS OF THE U.S. RULES?

PUBLIC NOTICE. HDC-Wendover-Greensboro Partners, LP Mr. Key Kasravi Kingsride Lane, Suite 280 Houston, Texas 77024

Agricultural Ditches, Waterways and Wetlands: Sorting It Out

Waters of the U.S. Potential Questions to Ask

Estimated Fiscal Impacts on Selected Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permittees

CESAM-RD-NB August 15, 2013 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. SAM JSC

Mapping and Understanding YOUR LAKE S WATERSHED By: Tony Groves, Pam Tyning, and Tory Meyers Water Resources Group, Progressive AE

Wetland Functions in the Watershed: Part 1 Watershed Elements. USDA NRCS Module Name 1

Appendix E Preliminary Jurisdictional Wetland Delineation Report, JYL 2008

CESAM-RD- N April 2, 2013 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. SAM CHE

Regulatory Program. SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (AJD): 13 September 2018

Regulatory Program SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):

CESAM-RD- N April 2, 2013 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. SAM CHE

Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas

Will County Site Development Permit Submittal Checklist TAB 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW

Old Mill School Stream Restoration

USE ATTAINABILITY ANALYSIS Unnamed Drainage to Foster Reservoir in the Beaver Creek Watershed, Big Horn Basin. March 9, 2004

A floodplain provides important functions in the natural environment such as:

Appendix D: Spatial Analysis & Initial Planning investigation

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL DECISION FILE NO SAVANNAH DISTRICT

8. A. AQUATIC HABITATS

Public Notice. MVK Ms. Tarmiko Graham (601) July 25, 2018 August 23, 2018

Deep River-Portage Burns Waterway Watershed 2015

S.R. 4007, Section 14B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat

Town of Sandown Wetland Evaluation Report

Summary and Key Points from the Proposed Rule Revised Definition of Waters of the United States

Public Notice No. LRL sea 2 Feb Mar 2018

Town of Fremont Wetland Evaluation Report

39. WETLANDS Introduction. Wetlands and Waterbodies Cook Inlet Drainages

Stormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans)

CLEARWATER TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Plant, Wildlife and Wetland Assessment

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Folder UTM List UTM list determined by folder location NAD83 / UTM zone 37S

Ditches in North Carolina

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MOBILE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 2288 MOBILE, AL

A Hydrologic Study of the. Ryerson Creek Watershed

Transcription:

Ms. Joanna Helms Economic Development Director Town of Apex 73 Hunter Street P.O. Box 250 Apex, North Carolina 27502 October 23, 2015 Reference: Report of Wetland Determination Cash Perkins Site ECS Project No: 06-23000 Dear Ms. Helms: ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the wetland determination performed for the Cash Perkins Site located on in Apex, Wake County, North Carolina. This report summarizes our findings for the site. Background The site is located on in. The site consists of two contiguous parcels which total approximately 121 acres. According to the Wake County Online GIS Database, the Parcel Identification Numbers (PINs) are Parcel 1-0751234512 (60.65 acres) and Parcel 2-0751130961 (60.65 acres). The site consists mostly of undeveloped, wooded land. Based on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, two unnamed tributaries to Middle Creek are depicted on the central and eastern portions of the site. Additionally, several drainage swales are depicted throughout the site. A 50-foot Colonial Pipeline easement is depicted along the northern portion of the site. Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology indicators must be present described in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the Appropriate Regional Supplement. Literature Review ECS reviewed the USGS Topographic Map, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey of Wake County, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), and the Geologic Map of North Carolina to obtain information regarding the site. [Type text] 1 [Type text]

The USGS Topographic Map (Figure 1), Apex, North Carolina Quadrangle (dated 1999), depicts two unnamed tributaries to Middle Creek on the central and eastern portions of the site. Additionally, several drainage swales are depicted throughout the site. The USDA Soil Survey of Wake County (Figure 2) depicts several streams on the western, central, and eastern portions of the site. Soils on-site have been mapped as Appling sandy loam (ApD and AsC2), Augusta fine sandy loam (Au), Cecil gravelly sandy loam (CgB2 and CgC2), Creedmoor sandy loam (CrC2), Chewacla sandy loam (Cm), Georgeville silt loam (GeB2, GeC, GeC2, and GeD2), and Worsham sandy loam (Wy). Appling sandy loam is well drained and occurs on hillslopes of ridges. Augusta fine sandy loam is somewhat poorly drained and occurs on stream terraces. Cecil gravelly sandy loam is well drained and occurs on interfluves. Creedmoor sandy loam is moderately well drained and occurs on hillslopes of ridges. Chewacla sandy loam is somewhat poorly drained and occurs on floodplains. Georgeville silt loam is well drained and occurs on interfluves. Worsham sandy loam is poorly drained and occurs in depressions. Augusta sandy loam, Chewacla sandy loam, and Worsham sandy loam soils are identified on the North Carolina Hydric Soils List. ECS reviewed the USFWS NWI Map of the site (Figure 3). The map does not depict surface waters on-site. ECS reviewed the FEMA-Firm Service Center Website. The site is depicted on the FEMA FIRM Map as panel 3720075100J (Figure 4). The map indicates that the site is located in Zone X, which are areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. However, located along the southern, central portion of the site is Zone A which is special flood hazard areas (SFHAs) subject to inundation by the 1% annual chance flood event. The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The Piedmont Province lies between the Coastal Plain Province and the Blue Ridge Mountains. Elevations range from 300 to 600 feet above sea level east of the Piedmont. To the west, elevations gradually rise to about 1,500 feet above sea level. The Piedmont is characterized by gently rolling, well rounded hills and long low ridges with a few hundred feet of elevation difference between the hills and valleys. In general, shallow unconfined groundwater movement with the overlying soils is controlled largely by topographic gradients. Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and typically discharges into streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the water table is transient and can vary with seasonal fluctuation in precipitation. Movement in this water table is generally from higher to lower elevations. As such, shallow groundwater would be expected to flow beneath the site to south towards Middle Creek. Site Reconnaissance ECS performed the site reconnaissance on October 16, 2015. The site consists mostly of undeveloped, wooded land. A Colonial Pipeline easement transects the northwestern 2

portion of the site. Surrounding properties consist of commercial developments and undeveloped, wooded land. Ponds were not observed on site. Several streams are located along the western, central, and eastern portions of the site. The streams had well-defined bed and banks, moderate to strong sinuosity, moderate baseflow, well sorted substrate, and contained macrobenthos. The streams varied in width from two to eight feet and one to five feet in depth. Wetland hydrology indicators (including inundation and saturated soils), hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils were observed along the stream channels on the western and eastern portions of the site. Figures 5 depicts the approximate locations of the wetland and streams on the site. General Discussion Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into waters of the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of the United States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and streams, intermittent streams, and wetlands. Activities that could be regulated under Section 404 include the placement of fill for construction of roadways; residential, commercial or industrial structures; and the construction of water retention ponds along tributaries. The EPA and the USACE jointly administer the Section 404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to approve, condition, or deny Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters. Streams located on the site are regulated by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). ECS recommends that the stream and wetlands on the site be delineated, verified, and surveyed to determine their exact locations and extent. Permits are required prior to impacting open waters, including perennial or intermittent streams. Mitigation and stormwater management plans will be a condition of permits issued for the site. Buffers may be required adjacent to the ponds and streams. For impacts to one-half acre or more of wetlands/waters or to 300 linear feet or more of perennial stream channel, an individual permit (IP) may be required. According the FIRM, floodplains are located on the southern, central portion of the site. An IP may be required to authorize impacts if wetlands are located in a floodplain. An IP requires a habitat analysis, alternative site analysis, project justification, plans to avoid and minimize impacts, and a proposed mitigation plan. Depending on the habitat analysis and the extent of impacts, and Environmental Impact Statement may be required by the USACE. An IP allows for a public comment period and may require 4 to 18 months to obtain depending on conditions arising during the USACE review and public comment period. 3

State Riparian Buffer Requirements Watershed Classification/ State Buffers The site is located in the Neuse River Basin. Therefore, a 50-foot riparian buffer zone is required for the streams on the site. Riparian buffers exist on both sides of surface waters, including intermittent and perennial streams, lakes and ponds, as determined by the most recent USGS Topographic Map and/or last published soil survey, and must be protected and maintained in accordance with the NCDEQ rules. A variance must be obtained prior to impacting these buffers for non-exempt activities. Stormwater Requirements Several unnamed tributaries to Middle Creek transect the site. According to the NCDEQ, surface waters located on site flow south towards Middle Creek which is classified as C; Nutrient Sensitive Waters. ECS reviewed the NCDWR online stormwater permitting map to determine jurisdiction of NCDEQ stormwater regulations. According to the online permitting map, it appears the site is located in an area designated as local permitting authority. ECS recommends consultation with a civil engineer to determine if mandatory vegetative buffers and/or regulated development (impervious surfaces) setbacks are required for the site in addition to those mentioned above. Findings ECS conducted a jurisdictional waters/wetland determination on the site. Based on our background research and field observations, jurisdictional waters are located on site. ECS recommends that prior to site development activities, a full wetland and stream delineation be performed on the site. ECS recommends those findings be confirmed by a representative of the USACE and the NCDEQ to verify the jurisdictional boundaries and to classify waters on site. After the jurisdictional boundaries have been verified by the agencies, a metes-and-bounds survey should be conducted by a registered surveyor to accurately determine the extent of the jurisdictional waters and wetlands on the project site. 4

Closure ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland and stream determination services for your project. Please contact us at (919) 861-9910 if you have any questions concerning this report. Sincerely, ECS CAROLINAS, LLP Cory Darnell Environmental Project Manager W. Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS Environmental Department Manager Attachments: Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 USDA-NRCS Soil Map Figure 3 National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 4 FEMA FIRM Map Figure 5 Wetland Determination Map Site Photographs 5