D1 REGIONAL PLANNING MODEL (D1RPM V1.0.3)

Similar documents
TM-1 District One Regional Model ( ) Executive Summary. February 2016

CHAPTER 9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL SUMMARY

SERPM8.0 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPDATE DATA AVAILABILITY AND NEEDS

Using the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Simplified Trips-on-Project Software (STOPS) for Transit Demand Estimation

CHAPTER 7. TRAVEL PATTERNS AND TRAVEL FORECASTING

Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG

APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS

POLK COUNTY TPO Polk County 2060 Transportation Vision Plan Final Report. ADOPTED June 18, 2009

draft report DRAFT Model Documentation Dane County Travel Demand Model Wisconsin Department of Transportation Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Standardization of Travel Demand Models

APPENDIX TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING OVERVIEW MAJOR FEATURES OF THE MODEL

9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT

Transportation Model Report

Trips on project forecasting How STOPS works Making STOPS work for you Experience thus far with STOPS applications

report final Decennial Model Update Executive Summary Contra Costa Transportation Authority Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

MEMORANDUM. To: Andrew Brennan, MBTA April 29, 2005

Chapter 8 Travel Demand Forecasting & Modeling

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Chapter #9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

Refined Statewide California Transportation Model. Progress Report November 2009

Database and Travel Demand Model

Appendix B Southeast Extension Technical Framework Report (RTD, December 15, 2011) Southeast Corridor Extension Scoping Report

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

Activity-Based Modeling: National Experience

Approaches to Time of Day Modeling CHAPTER I

Model Construction and Calibration Technical Documentation Draft

The Updated Whatcom Model Project Final Report. Prepared for: The Whatcom Council of Governments. February 28, 2014.

CHAPTER 2 - TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DEVELOPMENT

Appendix F 2008 Travel Demand Modeling

2. Goals and Objectives

Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model ABM Development (TCRPM4)

Maryland Statewide Transportation Model (MSTM)

TSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept - Analysis and Results

City of Tacoma TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN DRAFT

A Time Series Approach to Forecast Highway Peak Period Spreading and Its Application in Travel Demand Modeling

Travel Demand Forecasting User Guide

TBARTA 2015 Regional Transportation Master Plan 2040 Regional Long Range Transportation Plan AUGUST 2015

Transit Demand Analysis

Chapter 6: Regional Transportation

Florida Department of Transportation Daniels Parkway Fort Myers, FL 33913

Innovative Assignment Process for a Statewide Model

South Fulton Parkway Transit Feasibility Study Stakeholder Committee Meeting #2

The Transportation dividend

APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY FEBRUARY 2017

EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR MODAL DEVELOPMENT (MD) SUPPORT - CONTINUING. Financial Project Nos

MINIMUM TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL CALIBRATION and VALIDATION GUIDELINES FOR STATE OF TENNESSEE UPDATED 2012

Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF MAPS CHAPTER 1: REGIONAL GOODS MOVEMENT: LINKS TO OUR PAST AND TO OUR FUTURE

South Bay Metro Green Line Extension

Memphis and Shelby County. Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Travel Demand Model. Tennessee-Kentucky Model User Group Meeting

CHAPTER 8. Congestion Management

Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model v8.0

MEETING SUMMARY FOR APRIL 13, 2017

Transportation Modeling Forum. June 13, 2012

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Draft Update Presented to the Grand Forks East Grand Forks MPO TAC

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

Transport Model for Scotland. Kevin Lumsden MVA

New Mexico Statewide Model

SR 29 Project Development & Environment Study. Presentation to SR 29 Stakeholders Advisory Committee. January 23, 2014

EXHIBIT 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR THE GAINESVILLE URBANIZED AREA YEAR 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE. Prepared by:

Management and Integration of Data and Modeling at Santa Clara County Congestion Management Agency

Appendix B2: Factors Affecting Transit Choice

FUTURE BUS RAPID TRANSIT PLANS

DES MOINES AREA MPO. Environment Roundtable. October 13, 2015

technical report KATS Travel Model Update Technical Documentation Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

SHOALS AREA Long Range Transportation Plan. Prepared for: Northwest Alabama Council of Local Governments. Prepared by: Skipper Consulting, Inc.

REVIEW OF TRANSIT MODELING WITH RESPECT TO FTA GUIDANCE

Performance Based Transportation Project Assessment. Utilizing Travel Demand Model Data and Dynamic Economic Modeling

Central Manatee Network Alternatives Analysis

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: FREIGHT CONGESTION CONSIDERATIONS

4: Transportation and Land Use

What is the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP)?

The Auckland Transport Models Project - Overview and Use to Date -

Progress Report on the Implementation of the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS)

APPENDIX D. Glossary D-1

Travel Demand Model Questions

Strategic Transportation Plan FOCUS ON TRANSIT

SHIFT Model Training: Scenario 5A

Travel Demand Model Update

GENESEE COUNTY URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL IMPROVMENTS

SHIFT Model Training: Scenario 3A

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

2040 MTP Information Session Transportation Alternatives Analysis

MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP

Demand Reduction Assumptions Used For Travel Demand Analysis of EIS Alternatives

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050

CMNAA. Central Manatee Network Alternatives Analysis Alternatives Public Meeting CMNAA STUDY PROCESS. STUDY AREA 17th St. W

Chapter 4: Transportation and Land Use

A Presentation to: Project Advisory Group Meeting #7

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

Smart Growth Impact Fees

A Comparison of CEMDAP Activity-Based Model With DFWRTM 4-Step Model

EXAMPLES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES HOW TO ESTIMATE THE BENEFITS OF THE CTR PROGRAM

Sarasota/Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization. Performance Targets/Project Priorities Process September 2018

Appendix D. Tier 2 Final Environmental Assessment I-66 Transportation Technical Report

Rail Corridor Feasibility Study

Massive GPS Travel Pattern Data for Urban Congestion Relief in the Twin Cities

Transcription:

MODEL ADVANCEMENT COMMITTEE (MAC) MEETING APRIL 6, 2017 D1 REGIONAL PLANNING MODEL (D1RPM V1.0.3) Polk 12 County Area (previously individual models) 5,662 zones Manatee Hardee Okeechobee 2010 base year 2018 existing+committed 2040 cost feasible Sarasota DeSoto Charlotte Highlands Glades Support for 6 MPO LRTPs Compatible with CUBE 6.4.2 Lee Hendry Collier

travel time feedback loop The D1RPM Is a 4-step Model, trip-based model Trip Generation. Trip Distribution. Mode Choice. Assignment. Trip Generation Incorporates many of the Transit Model Update recommendations Trip Distribution Seeded with real speed for highway and transit vehicles Developed by FDOT Systems Planning, in conjunction with FTA guidance in 2012. TRANSITMODEL Includes Transit Prep, Transit Path, Mode Choice and Transit Assignment Uses Florida (ACS) 2010 data and trip generation rates. Trip purposes stratified by income: 45 markets include NHBO and HBCU purposes. Diurnal Factors Assignments Trip Table split by TOD Diurnal Factors split trips into 4 periods (AM, MD, PM, NT). A Feedback Loop is included to account for the effects of Post-Processes Reporting congestion on distribution and mode choice.

The D1RPM Updated 2010, Florida Based, Trip Generation Data Table HBW Trip Production Rates Table HB College/University and HB School Trip Production Rates H ousehold Income H ousehold Number of W orkers in H ousehold Household Household Size Autos Trip Purpose Autos W rks0 W rks1 W rks2 W rks3+ /Income Size1 Size2 Size3 Size4+ $0-$24999 0.000 1.000 1.783 3.500 HB College/University 0.016 0.036 0.266 0.363 All $25000-$49999 0.000 1.000 1.783 3.500 HB School 0.000 0.042 0.491 1.623 V eh0 $50000-$74999 0.000 1.000 1.783 3.500 $75000+ 0.000 1.000 1.783 3.500 $0-$24999 0.000 1.085 2.272 4.389 $25000-$49999 0.000 1.332 3.145 4.389 V eh1 $50000-$74999 0.000 Table 1.145 1 Trip 2.172 Attraction 4.389 Rates $75000+ 0.000 0.954 2.094 4.389 Industrial Service Commercial School $0-$24999 0.000 1.581 2.974 4.102 Households Employment Employment Employment Enroll. $25000-$49999 0.000 1.604 3.171 4.102 V eh2 Trip $50000-$74999 0.000 Purpose 1.572 2.863 Coeff. t-stat 4.102 Coeff. t-stat Coeff. t-stat Coeff. t-stat $75000+ 0.000 HBW 1.330 Inc1 3.111 0.0663 4.102 1.3 0.0910 7.4 0.2218 7.1 $0-$24999 0.000 HBW 1.595 Inc2 3.130 0.4764 5.075 6.9 0.1943 11.5 0.3642 8.5 $25000-$49999 0.000 2.297 3.109 5.075 V eh3+ HBW Inc3 0.1457 2.6 0.1932 14.3 0.2560 7.4 $50000-$74999 0.000 HBW 1.967 Inc4 3.247 0.5202 5.799 7.9 0.4225 26.5 0.3132 7.7 $75000+ 0.000 HBSh 1.551 3.119 5.799 3.2805 56.0 HBSR 0.1199 1.0 0.2359 8.0 0.6814 8.6 0.7368 35.5 HBO 0.4910 12.1 1.3213 12.9 1.1578 39.8 HBSc 1.326 HBU 0.549 NHBW 0.6346 7.6 0.4534 22.1 0.7118 13.0 0.1773 12.3 NHBO 0.2443 7.5 1.947 23.6 0.7514 32.1

The D1RPM Mode Choice Procedures Very similar to the transit methodology we have been using for years, but with some new wrinkles Use of REWALK for pre-processing of transit access-links. Transit routes may include dwell at stops, particularly at Transit Centers. Changes wait-time from ½ headway to 5 minutes. Uses (new) recommended Mode Choice coefficients. Mode Choice accommodates non-motorized modes of travel. Person Trips Auto Transit Non Mot Drive Alone Shared Ride Walk PnR KnR Walk Bike SR2 SR3+ LOC PRJ LOC PRJ LOC PRJ

The D1RPM D1RPM 2010 Model Airport Trip Model A unique airport trip generation (based on enplanements) and distribution program allows trips from SRQ, PGD & RSW to travel into tourist and other non-residential destinations at a higher rate.

The D1RPM The FLSWM 2010 Model (partial) Truck Trip Model Inter-state and intra-state Freight Truck trips from the State-wide Model are included as heavy trucks which move in and through D1. Intermodal logistic centers (ILC) are included.

The D1RPM Unique Procedures The LRTP CF networks include all roadway improvements proposed during the LRTP process. The field LRTP_KEY is used to easily include or exclude proposed roadway projects over the lifetime of the model. Projects that did not make it into the cost feasible model, may be advanced as funding opportunities arise. Any roadway with a LRTP_KEY<>0 is excluded from the UNLOADED.NET in subsequent model steps. This has proved to be a great time-saver allowing proposed improvements to be easily shown graphically.

The D1RPM Assignment Procedures MSA of congested speeds on each Feedback Loop. Relative Gap = 0.0012, Enhanced, Smoothed. Optional: Select-Link or Select-node or PATHFILE.

The D1RPM User Interface

The D1RPM - Current Model Update Base Year (2010), E+C (2018) and Cost Feasible Models (2040) Update to incorporate recent project level subarea refinements Incorporate any MPO amendments, revisions or corrections COUNTY SUBAREA REFINEMENTS COUNTY SUBAREA REFINEMENTS Charlotte / Lee Babcock Ranch NOPC and CPA Polk Memorial Hwy Lane Reduction (Lakeland) Charlotte / Lee SR 31 from SR 80 to CR 74 Polk SR 37 Lane Diet (Lakeland) Collier Naples Downtown Mobility Study Polk US 27 from Washington to Posner Collier to Glades SR 29 from Oil Well to SR 27 Sarasota I-75 / Fruitville Interchange Area Districtwide I-75 Auxiliary Lanes Sarasota Fruitville lane diet East of US 41 Lee I-75 @ Corkscrew Sarasota US 41 / Gulfstream Area Study Lee Lee Manatee Manatee I-75 @ Colonial US 41 lane diet Central Manatee (CMNAA) SR 64 E of I-75 Roundabout Evaluation Sarasota SR 72 E of I-75 A live model: v1.0.3 v1.0.4

The D1RPM -- 2015 Model Development 2015 Base Year Data Development A. 2015 Highway (GIS) New Roads Roadway Realignments / Deletions Lane Changes / Median Changes Directional Changes Traffic Signal Locations (type, phasing if available) B. 2014-2016 Traffic Counts (GIS) Count Location Shapefiles Classification Counts AADT Database Hourly Count Database (where available) Toll Facility Locations/Counts/Type/Fees C. 2015 Land Use Data (GIS) Census Data Parcel Data Hotel/Motel/Time Share Data (rooms and employees) Schools (K-12) - Students and Employees College/University - Students, Resident Students, and Employees Special Generators (ex. Legoland, beach parking) Airport Master Plans Major Freight Facilities (ex. ILC) Employment DRI Data Potential TAZ splits D. 2015 Parking Cost CBD Areas (Long Term, Short Term) E. Transit Shapefiles Route Alignment Park and Ride / Kiss and Ride Locations (Spaces, Cost) Transfer Centers Stops by route F. Route Maps w/ Stop Locations Schedules (hours of service and headways) G. Transit Route Ridership Systemwide Annual / Daily Ridership Route Daily Ridership (by Fare Category) Park and Ride / Kiss and Ride Use Number of Transfers H. Transit Stops and Stations Utilzation by Stop (ex. APC data) I. Transit Fares By Mode - Local Bus, Express Bus Discount Fares - (Bus pass rates for children, seniors, passes) Transfer Fares

The D1RPM -- 2015 Model Update May Include Modeling Autonomous Vehicles (AV / CV) Test Case Implementation (D1RPM) Assumes Level 3 Automation (connected vehicles, driver available for occasional control). Designed for what if Modeling, as well as, LRTP Modeling. Zero Saturation Rate = adopted model rates and assignment volumes. Saturation Rate (0% to 100%) Lookup Tables reflect Saturation Rate and provide: Estimate AV Trips by TAZ Estimate Roadway Capacity Adjustments (reduced following distance)

The D1RPM -- 2015 Model Update Modeling Autonomous Vehicles FT 95 may be restricted to AV only Home Based AV Auto Ownership weighted by Income. Roadway capacity adjusted based upon Facility Type and Saturation Rate. AV included as a separate trip purpose

The D1RPM -- 2015 Model Update Modeling Autonomous Vehicles Capacity Adjustment Factors - based on AV Saturation Rate and Facility Type: Propensity to Own AV based on Saturation Rate and Income:

The D1RPM -- 2015 Model Update Modeling Autonomous Vehicles Network with Capacity Adjustments. Trip Tables with AV and non-av by purpose. TRIP TABLES BY PURPOSE HBW1 HBW2 HBSH HBSR HBO HBSC HBCU NHB TT IE EE-a EE-t HT AIR NONAV 911,230 1,318,880 1,661,265 1,297,593 2,166,552 579,151 243,456 2,467,023 543,351 230,269 50,076 5,434 40,337 12,447 AV 473,119 853,911 963,474 793,701 1,316,413 338,754 142,306 2,277,252 501,555 212,556 46,224 5,016 37,234 11,489 TOTAL 1,384,349 2,172,791 2,624,739 2,091,294 3,482,965 917,905 385,762 4,744,275 1,044,906 442,825 96,300 10,450 77,571 23,936 Loaded Network with AV purpose(s).

The D1RPM -- 2015 Model Update May Include Modeling Ridesource (RS) Trips Trip Generation Additional SE data allows model to pick RS areas for consideration. Based on Population-Employment Density and Saturation Rate. Designated Service Areas Trip Distribution a paradigm shift in travel behavior (again) RS Trip Length. Vehicle Trip Tables (RS and Non-RS). Non-Revenue Roaming Trips. Assignment Pre-Assigned to Service Areas. Transit (access & egress) via RS. RS Included as a separate trip purpose.

The D1RPM -- 2015 Model Update Modeling Ridesource Trips Designated Service Areas Model RS Generation Mapped Over Uber Hot Spots

The D1RPM -- 2015 Model Update Modeling Ridesource Trips

The D1RPM -- 2015 Model Update Modeling Ridesource Trips Reporting for AV and RS

EXTRA SLIDES

The D1RPM -- Future Updates Modeling Other Modes Use procedures to quantify trips in Bicycle and Walk friendly Communities. Estimation of bike/pedestrian use

The D1RPM -- Future Updates Network Use of true-shape, as needed. Use of posted speeds. Trip Generation Use EE IE data FLSWM Time-of-Day (TOD) factoring here Trip Distribution Distribution by TOD TRANSITMODEL Assignment Transit periods to match TOD Mode choice calibration by TOD Tolls by TOD Enhanced reporting