Assessment of Technical Efficiency of Sorghum Production in Adamawa State, Nigeria

Similar documents
Possibility of Improvement in Sorghum Production: A Comparative Study of Technical Efficiency in India and Nigeria

International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research (IJOER) [Vol-1, Issue-1, May- 2015]

Analysis of Resource Use in Yam Production in Ukum Local Government Area of Benue State, Nigeria

ECONOMICS OF SORGHUM PRODUCTION IN GUYUK LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF ADAMAWA STATE, NIGERIA

Technical Efficiency in Food Crop Production in Oyo State, Nigeria

PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF SORGHUM PRODUCTION IN INDIA

VOL. 3, NO. 5, May 2013 ISSN ARPN Journal of Science and Technology All rights reserved.

*Department Of Agricultural Economics And Extension Ladoke Akintola University Of Technology Ogbomoso E- mail:

Analysis Of Constraints Influencing Sorghum Farmers Using Garrett s Ranking Technique; A Comparative Study Of India And Nigeria

Agrosearch (2015) 15 No

Available online at Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science (2010), 18(2):

EFFICIENCY OF RICE FARMERS IN NIGERIA: POTENTIALS FOR FOOD SECURITY AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION.

Analysis of Cost and Return of Maize Production in Numan Local Government Area of Adamawa State, Nigeria

Technical Efficiency and Costs of Production among Small holder Rubber Farmers in Edo State, Nigeria

Gender Comparison in Production and Productivity of Cocoa Farmers in Ile Oluji Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF COWPEA PRODUCTION IN NIGERIA

Technical Efficiency and Cost of Production among Gum Arabic Farmers in Jigawa State, Nigeria

Igbekele A. Ajibefun INTRODUCTION

Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF SORGHUM PRODUCTION IN HONG LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF ADAMAWA STATE, NIGERIA. Abba Mohammed Wakili, Researcher

Assessment of youth involvement in yam production in Wukari local Government area of Taraba State, Nigeria

D. C. MAURICE, Y. ADAMU AND M. JOSEPH

A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS OF BAMBARA GROUNDNUT PRODUCTION IN WESTERN KENYA

VOL. 3, NO. 7, July 2013 ISSN ARPN Journal of Science and Technology All rights reserved.

Estimation of Technical Efficiency of Irrigated Rice Farmers in Niger State, Nigeria

Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics. Technical Efficiency of Cassava - Based Cropping in Oyo State of Nigeria

Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences vol. 16 No. 2 December

Agricultural Financing Using Nigerian Agricultural Cooperative and Rural Development Bank in Adamawa State: A Case Study of Fufore L.G.A.

The effect of roll back malaria programme on farmers productivity in Benue State, Nigeria

Archive of SID. Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Cocoa Farmers in Cross River State, Nigeria. Abstract

THE EFFICIENCY OF INPUT USAGE OF ORGANIC PADDY FARMING IN INDONESIA

OHAJIANYA D.O, P.C. OBASI AND J.S. OREBIYI

MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY AND EFFICIENCY OF POTATO PRODUCTION IN TWO SELECTED AREAS OF BANGLADESH: A TRANSLOG STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS

ISSN: I. B., Adinya, B. O. Offem * and G. U. Ikpi *

COST AND RETURN OF RESOURCE USE EFFICIENCY AMONG THE BENEFICIARY CROP FARMERS OF NATIONAL FADAMA II PROJECT IN ADAMAWA STATE, NIGERIA

ANALYSIS OF INTER-TEMPORAL PRICING EFFI- CIENCY OF SORGHUM IN GUYUK LOCAL GOVERN- MENT OF ADAMAWA STATE, NIGERIA

Technical efficiency analysis of yam production in Edo state: A stochastic frontier approach

Comparative Analysis of Socio-Economic Determinants of Rain-fed Maize Production in Jaunpur District Uttar Pradesh, India and Adamawa State, Nigeria

Economies of Scale and Cost Efficiency in Small Scale Maize Production: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria

Yam Price Transmission between Taraba and Borno States of Nigeria

Efficiency in Sugarcane Production Under Tank Irrigation Systems in Tamil Nadu, India

STOCHASTIC MAIZE PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTION RISK ANALYSIS IN DADAR DISTRICT, EAST ETHIOPIA

The Impact of Rural Financial Services on the Technical Efficiency of Rice Farmers in the Upper North of Thailand 1

ANALYSIS OF INCOME DETERMINANTS AMONG RURAL HOUSEHOLDS IN KWARA STATE, NIGERIA

Technical Efficiency Analysis of Maize Production: Evidence from Ghana

ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF GINGER (Zingiber officinale Rose.) CULTIVATION IN SOME SELECTED LOCATIONS OF BANGLADESH. Abstract

Agro-Science Journal of Tropical Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension Volume 8 Number 2 May 2009 pp ISSN

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF SHRIMP FARMERS IN BANGLADESH: A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION ANALYSIS

Profitability and technical efficiency of Boro rice (BRRI dhan29) cultivation in Dinajpur and Bogra of Bangladesh

Comparative Economic Analysis of Rainy and Dry Season Maize Production among Farmers in Ekiti State, Nigeria Abstract 1.

Can Small-scale Tomato Farmers Flourish in Benue State, Nigeria?

Estimating Technical Efficiency of IRRI Rice Production in the Northern Parts of Bangladesh

Esxon Publishers. International Journal of Applied Research and Technology ISSN

RESOURCE-USE EFFICIENCY AND RETURN TO SCALE IN SMALLHOLDERS COTTON FARMING SYSTEM IN PARBHANI, MAHARASHTRA P. M. Tayade 1 and Prema Borkar 2

Resource Use Efficiency In Onion Production Among Participating And Non-Participating

Assessing Cost Efficiency among Small Scale Rice Producers in the West Region of Cameroon: A Stochastic Frontier Model Approach

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF SUGARCANE PRODUCTION IN DISTRICT DERA ISMAIL KHAN

Technical efficiency and productivity of maize producers in eastern Ethiopia: a study of farmers within and outside the Sasakawa-Global 2000 project

Socio-economic factors influencing adoption of improved Yam production technologies in Abia state, Nigeria

Analysis of Resource Use efficiency in Bt. Cotton and American Cotton in Sri Ganganagar District of Rajasthan

Perception of Agricultural Information Needs by Small-Scale Maize Farmers in Isin Local Government Area of Kwara State

FUW Trends in Science & Technology Journal April, 2016 Vol. 1 No. 1 e-issn: ; p-issn: pp

The Impact of Agricultural Extension Services on Farm Household Efficiency in Ethiopia

Efficiency of Resource Use by Rice Farmers in Ebonyi State, South East Nigeria: A Data Envelopment Analysis

Productivity of Maize Farmers in Surulere Local Government Area of Oyo State

Technical Efficiency of Temple Owned Lands in Tamil Nadu, India

ESTIMATION OF FARM LEVEL TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND ITS DETERMINANTS AMONG MALE AND FEMALE SWEET POTATO FARMERS IN IMO STATE, NIGERIA 1

Technical Efficiency Analysis in Male and Female-Managed Farms: A Study of Maize. Production in West Pokot District, Kenya.

Usman, J. Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension Adamawa State University, Mubi, Nigeria

Technical Efficiency and Determinants of Maize Production by Smallholder Farmers in the Moneragala District of Sri Lanka

Analysis of Agricultural Extension Methods Used by Extension Workers for Conflict Resolution among Agro Pastoralists in Adamawa State, Nigeria

Performance of participatory and non-participatory farmers of integrated crop management project at Pirganj upazila under Thakurgaon district

Estimation of Farm Level Technical Efficiency in Smallscale Swamp Rice Production in Cross River State of Nigeria: A Stochastic Frontier Approach

AN ANALYSIS OF IMPACT OF CONTRACT FARMING ON FARM PRODUCTIVITY AND EFFICIENCY THE CASE OF HYBRID PADDY SEED CULTIVATION IN SOUTH INDIA

ESTIMATION OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY ON WHEAT FARMS IN NORTHERN INDIA A PANEL DATA ANALYSIS. Dr. S. K. Goyal

b) Variable resources: Some resources like seed, fertilizer, labour, etc vary with the level of output. These are variable resources.

Factors Influencing Market Participation among Sesame Producers in Benue State, Nigeria

Okoye, C. U. Departments of Agricultural Economics University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria

ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS BY LIVESTOCK FARMERS IN BENUE STATE, NIGERIA ABSTRACT

ECONOMICS OF HYBRID MAIZE PRODUCTION IN SOME SELECTED AREAS OF BANGLADESH. M. R. KARIM 1, MONIRUZZAMAN 2 AND Q. M. ALAM 3 Abstract

*Corresponding author.

Livestock Production Systems and Technical Inefficiency of Feedlot Cattle Farms in Thailand *

Estimation of Technical Efficiency of Wheat Farms A Case Study in Kurdistan Province, Iran

Journal Of Agriculture and Social Research (JASR) Vol. 8, No.1, 2008

Pattern of Inorganic Fertilizer use among Food Crop Farmers in Ogun State, Nigeria

Profitability of Sole Cowpea Production in Gombi Zone Of Adamawa State Agricultural Development Programme, Nigeria

DETERMINANTS AND MEASUREMENT OF FOOD INSECURITY IN NIGERIA: SOME EMPIRICAL POLICY GUIDE.

American International Journal of Social Science Vol. 4, No. 2; April 2015

Technical Efficiency of rice producers in Mwea Irrigation Scheme

EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF CEREAL -LEGUME BASED CROPPING SYSTEM IN KACHIA AND KAGARKO LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS OF KADUNA STATE

CONTRIBUTION OF FORMAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO CASSAVA PROCESSING IN BENUE STATE, NIGERIA

Maize Farming and Fertilizers: Not a Profitable Mix in Nigeria

PAT 2007; 3 (1): 1-9 ISSN:

RURAL FARMERS INVOLVEMENT IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRIORITIZATION OF THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS IN OJU LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF BENUE STATE V.U.

EFFECTS OF RURAL-URBAN YOUTH MIGRATION ON FARM FAMILIES IN BENUE STATE, NIGERIA

ABSTRACT I. INTRODUCTION

Introduction Myanmar located at strategic area between world s biggest populated countries where above one-third of world s population over 7 billion

ECONOMICS OF RICE BASED CROPPING SYSTEM ABSTRACT

Analysis of Technical Efficiency and Its Determinants among Small Scale Rice Farmers in Patigi Local Government Area of Kwara State, Nigeria

Journal of Asian Scientific Research PROFIT EFFICIENCY AMONG PADDY FARMERS: A COBB-DOUGLAS STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION ANALYSIS

Transcription:

Assessment of Technical Efficiency of Sorghum Production in Adamawa State, Nigeria Jimjel Zalkuwi 1, Rakesh Singh 2, O. P. Singh 3 1,2,3 Department of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agricultural science, BHU, Varanasi-221005, India Corresponding author s email:jzalkwi4u {at} gmail.com ABSTRACT---- The study examined the technical efficiency of sorghum production in Adamawa State, Nigeria. Data were collected from 240 farmers using purposive and simple random sampling with aid of structured schedule. The result of the stochastic frontier production function analysis shows that the variance parameters, that is the sigma squared (δ 2 ) and the gamma (γ) were statistically significant at 1 % level for sorghum production. The coefficient of farm size, family labor, seed and fertilizer were positive and significant at 1%, 5% and 10% levels while fertilizer was not significant. Profit level can be increased by increasing the amount of farm size, quantity of seed, labor and chemical and decreasing the use of fertilizer. Mean efficiency was 0.68; Farmers operate at 32% below frontier level due to variation in technical efficiency. The inefficiency model shows that the coefficient of Age, literacy level and credit have negative a priori sign and in consonance with the a priori expectation. 1. INTRODUCTION Nigeria is the largest producer of sorghum in West Africa accounting for about 71% of the total regional sorghum output. Sorghum is the 3rd cereal in terms of quantity of production in Nigeria. Agricultural industry was accorded scanty attention after the discovery of oil in commercial quantity in Nigeria. This has created a gap between the demand and supply of domestic food requirements. Consequently, the country has found it increasingly difficult to feed her teeming population and supply the local industries from the domestically produced food and raw materials. Annual widening gap between food and raw materials demand and supply in the country gave room for concern Igben (1988). In Adamawa State, sorghum is the most cultivated crop and it is grown on an area of about 70,000 hectares, with 41,000 hectares cultivated under sole and 29,000 hectares cultivated mixed cropping, (Adamawa Agricultural Development Programme (ADADP, 2010). The total production of sorghum in the State in 2012 was 72,000 tonnes with an estimated average yield of 1.18 tonnes/hectares (National Bureau of Statistics 2013) The productivity growth may be achieved through either technological progress or efficiency improvement (Coelli, 1995). Several studies indicated that the existing low levels of technical efficiency hinder efforts to achieve progress in production (Belete et al., 1991; Seyoum et al., 1997). Despite the significant growth in sorghum production, there is huge inefficiency in the production system of sorghum production. An improvement in the efficiency of production system will have direct positive impact on agricultural growth, nutritional security and rural livelihood in a country like Nigeria, where sorghum is one of the major crops. Under these circumstances it is important to know that whether the producers have the same or different levels of technical efficiency. The study therefore, tries to measure the technical efficiency under different farm in Adamawa State of Nigeria 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Selection of the state and local government Adamawa State based on their production level has been selected purposively. The state has twenty-one Local Government Areas which are categorized into four agricultural zones; South West, Central, North West and North East Zone. Twenty percent Local Government Area have been( i.e four LGA) have been purposively selected from each zone, comprise Viz; Ganye, Guyuk, Mubi south and Girei. 2.2 Selection of district Ten percent i.e. one district from each Local government was selected purposively on the basis of highest sorghum production. Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 542

2.3 Selection of villages A list of all villages in the four districts was prepared on the basis of sorghum production, 10 percent of the villages having the highest sorghum production in each district were selected, and then 10 percent of the farmers were selected randomly to give a total of 240 farmers 2.4 Collection of data Primary data was collected from 240 sorghum farmers from Adamawa state, Nigeria. The main instrument that was used for collecting the data was structured schedule. Simple random sampling and purposive sampling techniques were used at various stages as the selection procedures in the selection of 240 respondents. 2.5 Analytical tools The inferential statistics (the stochastic frontier production model) was used. 2.6 The Empirical Stochastic Frontier Production Model The stochastic frontier production function used in this study was specified as follows: LogY i = B o + B 1 log X 1 + B 2 logx 2 + B 3 logx 3 +.B 6 log X 6 + V i U i (5) Where Y = Output of sorghum (kg) X 1 = Farm size (hectares) X 2 = Quantity of fertilizer applied (kg) X 3 = Quantity of sorghum seed planted (kg) X 5 = Quantity of herbicides used (litres) X 5 = Amount of family labour used (man-days) X 6 = Amount of hired labour used (man-days) X 7 = Expenses on ploughing (tractor and animal traction) V i = Random noise (white noise) which are N(0,δ 2, V) U i = Inefficiency effects which are non-negative, half normal distribution N(0,δ 2, U) Operational definition of the variables of empirical stochastic production function for Sorghum Production is as follow: i. Output of Sorghum farmer: This is the total yield obtained per hectare by farmers in kilogram equivalent weight. ii. Farm size: This is the size of land used in producing Sorghum crop by the farmers. It is measure in hectare. iii. Quality of fertilizer: This refers to the quantity of fertilizer use in kilograms. iv. Quantity of Seed: This refers to the quantity of seed in Kilogram equivalent weight used for planting by the farmers. v. Herbicide: this refers to the quantity of herbicide used in litres. vi. Family labour: This is the total man days of labour per hectare supplied by house hold during the farm operation. The standard man day is 8 hour per day. vii. Hired labours: this is the total man-days of paid labour per hectare viii. Expense on ploughing: This is the expenses paid on ploughing the land either with tractor or animals. The technical efficiency of sorghum production for i th farmers, defined by the ratio of observed product as to the corresponding frontier production associated with no technical inefficiency, is expressed by; Variance parameters are δ 2 = So that O γ 1 The inefficiency model is defined by, Where, U i = inefficiency effect TE = Exp (-U i ) so that O Te 1 (6) δ 2 V + δ 2 U and γ = δ 2 U/ δ 2 (7) U i = δ o + δ 1 Z 1 + δ 2 Z 2 + δ 3 Z 3 + δ 5 Z 5 + δ 5 Z 5 + δ 6 Z 6 + δ 7 Z 7 (8) Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 543

Z 1 = Age of farmer (in years) Z 2 = Literacy level (in years) Z 3 = Farming experience (in years) Z 5 = Extension contact (1 contacted, 0 otherwise) Z 5 = Gender of the farmer (1 female and 0 for female) Z 6 = Family size (total number of person in household) Z 7 = Access to formal credit (binary) The operational definition of the empirical inefficiency parameter of the stochastic frontiers for Sorghum Production is given as: i. Age: This is the age of individual farmers involved in the farm operation. ii. Literacy level: This is measured as the numbers of years put in by farmers to acquired basic formal education. Specifically O years denotes no formal education: 6 years denote primary education. 12 years denote secondary education. 15 years denote diploma and NCE holder: while greater than 15 years denotes graduates. iii. Farmer experience: This is measured as the number of years that farmers have been into Sorghum production. iv. Extension contact: This measures the frequency of meeting between the farmers and extension workers during the last cropping seasons. v. Family Size: This is the numbers of house hold member who have attained the age of 15 years and above that are available for farm operation. vi. Access to Credit: This is a measure as the farmers accessibility to credit facilities to finance their who have accessed credit facilities and O δ 2, δ o, γ, βs are unknown parameters that were estimated. The maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) for all the parameters of the stochastic frontier production function and the inefficiency model defined above and the technical efficiency was obtained using the Frontier 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Table 1 Maximum Likelihood Estimate of the Cobb-Douglas Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model Variable Parameter Coefficient t-ratio Variable Parameter Production factors Constant β 0 2.8465*** 9.7321 Farm size (X1) β 1 0.2152*** 3.3895 Labour (X2) β 2 0.1952** 2.1981 Seed (X3) β 3 0.2061** 2.3258 Fertilizer (X4) β 4-0.0091-0.5849 Chemicals (X5) β 5 0.0490 1.4212 Diagnostic statistics Sigma squared (ɗ 2 ) 0.6688*** 5.2574 Gamma (ϓ) 0.4530*** 0.1368 Inefficiency effects Gender ɗ 1-0.1683*** -2.7568 Marital status ɗ 2-0.0220-0.4301 Age ɗ 3-0.1947** -2.1432 Family size ɗ 4-0.0087-0.0447 Education ɗ 5-0.1692*** -2.7431 Farming experience ɗ 6-0.0751-0.4737 Credit ɗ 7-0.2271*** -0.3458 Extension visit ɗ 8 0.0188 0.2704 *** Estimates are significant at1% level, ** Estimates are significant at 5% level. *Estimates are significant at 10% level The maximum likelihood estimates of the stochastic frontier production function and inefficiency model results are presented in Table 1. The estimate for parameters of the stochastic frontier production function indicates that the elasticity of output with farm size was positive, approximately 0.2152. They were all statistically significant at 1 % level. Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 544

This implies that a one percent increase in area under sorghum production will raise output of sorghum by 0.2152%. This shows that land is a very important factor in sorghum production both in India and Nigeria. This finding is at tandem with the findings of; Maurice et al., (2005); Odoh and Folake (2006) Gwandi et al(2010) ; Ibrahim et al (2014);Zalkuwi et al(2014), that land has positive sign and statistically significant. The significance of labour in the study area cannot be over-emphasized as the coefficient of labour was (0.195), are significant and positively related to sorghum output. This means that an increase in man days of labour by 1% would increase sorghum output by 0.20%. The implication of this is that respondents with relatively large household size have the potential to increase their total farm output in that labour needed for the execution of important farm operations such as weeding is not expected to be a limitation. Also, farmers whose main objective is household food security would be more concerned with maximizing their output per unit of resource used, especially family labour; that is, they tend to emphasize technical efficiency (Amaza et al., 2006). seed was an important factor in sorghum production, with Seed input having an elasticity coefficient of 0.2061 and positively related to total output of sorghum in the study area. This shows that a 1% increase in quantity of seeds used in production would increase output of sorghum by 0.2061%. By implication, raising the productivity of seed is expected to translate into a more than proportionate increase in the output of sorghum per hectare. This agrees with Olayide and Heady (1982) who stated that agricultural productivity can be increased through increase in the quantity of a particular input, or increase in the productivity of input, or a combination of both. So seed is a very important factor of production. The significant and positive sign of seed variable also indicated that a moderate increase in population of sorghum on the field will increase the yield provided that, the farm is not over populated beyond the recommended sorghum ration or mixture ratio capacity that will lead to competition for nutrients which will lower the yield. This finding is in consonance with the work of Shehu et al. (2007a) ; Ogundari (2008) ;Zalkuwi et al (2014) and Ibrahim et al (2014), who found that seed is an important factor in production The production elasticity of fertilizer was -0.0091, it was not statistically significant, the insignificance of fertilizer use may be due to the good and fertile nature of the soil of the area which makes farmers to cultivate without much need for fertilizer. This has also encouraged more farmers in the study are to shift much of their attention to sorghum cultivation, since access to fertilizer has become prerogative of the few elite and politically connected farmers. This study is in harmony with the finding of Zalkuwi (2013) The production elasticity for chemical was 0.0490 and was not significant This might be because of the technicality involved in using chemicals in multi-cropping system, so it requires skills. The above result reveals that the important factors of sorghum production are land, labour and seed The estimated gamma parameter (γ) is 0.4530 and also significant at 1% level, indicating that 45% of the variation in the total output of production among the sampled farmers is due to differences in their technical efficiencies in India and Nigeria respectively. The estimated sigma square (δ 2 ) was (0.6688) and significantly different from zero at 1% level. This indicates a good fit and the correctness of the specified distributional assumption of the composite error The inefficiency parameters include gender, marital status, age, family size, education, farming experience, credit, and extension agent. The inefficiency parameters are specific as those relating to farmers specific socio-economic characteristics and were examined by using the estimated ɗ coefficients. According to Adebayo, (2007), a negative ɗ coefficient indicates that the parameters have a positive effect on efficiency and vice versa. The coefficient of gender is estimated to be negative and statistically significant at 1% level. This implies that increase in the gender by one unit will increase the efficiency of the farmers; this implies that increase in family size by one unit (Adult male) will increase the efficiency of the farmer The coefficient of marital status is estimated to be negative and insignificant The coefficient of farming experience is negative but insignificant, meaning that as the farming experience of sorghum farmers in the study area decreases, their technical inefficiency will decrease. This is in harmony with the study Zalkuwi (2013) The coefficient of education variable is estimated to be negative and statistically significant at 1% level. This implies that farmers that are literate tend to be more efficient in agricultural production; this is due to their enhanced ability to acquire technical knowledge, which enhances their Agricultural productivity. It is plausible that farmers with education respond easily to the use of improved technology. This finding agrees with the study of shehu et al., (2007) as cited by Maurice (2012) who also found a positive relationship between education and technical efficiency. Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 545

The coefficient of the extension variable is estimated to be positive and insignificant. This implies that increased extension visits do not accord the farmer the opportunity to learn new improved technologies and how to acquire the needed inputs and services. The coefficient of age is significant at 5% level and positively influences farmers likelihood to practice crop diversification, indicating that older farmers are more likely to practice or adopt crop diversification than younger farmers. Entrepreneurial ability and farm management skills increase with experience which is a function of age. Older farmers are more likely to perceive, interpret and respond to new innovation in the context of risk management than younger farmers. Table 2 Technical Efficiency Rating of the Sorghum Farmers Efficiency Frequency Percentage <0.40 2 0.8 0.40 0.49 0.50 0.59 0.60 0.69 0.70 0.79 0.80 0.89 0.90 1.00 Total Minimum efficiency Maximum efficiency Mean efficiency 12 5.0 24 10.0 22 9.2 64 26.7 78 32.5 38 15.8 240 100 0.353 0.964 0.775 Source: Computed from Stochastic Frontier Result The technical efficiency in Table 2 was derived from MLE result of the stochastic production function. The result shows that the TE of the respondents was less than 1 (100 %) hence the variation in TE exits among respondents. It means that, all the respondents produced below maximum efficiency. The minimum efficiency in India was 0.2864, while their maximum efficiency was 0.9350; and their mean efficiency were 0.6774. The distribution of the farm efficiency for sorghum production shows that, majority (69 %) of them operated above 59 % of their maximum efficiency and 31 % operated below 59% while the distribution of technical efficiency of the farmers in Nigeria reveals that about 6% had technical efficiency of less than 50 percent, while about 19% had technical efficiency of 50-69 percent, 75% of the respondents had technical efficiency of 70% and above. The magnitude of the mean technical efficiency of the farmers is a reflection of the fact that most of the sampled farmers carry out sorghum production under technical conditions, involving the use of inefficient tools, local seed varieties and so on. 4. REFERENCES Adamawa Agricultural Development Programme (2010). Crop Production recommendation for Adamawa State. Adamawa Agricultural Development Programme, Yola-Nigeria pp8-13. Adebayo, E.F. (2007). Resource Use efficiency of Dairy Pastoralist in Adamawa State, Nigeria. Journal of Arid Agriculture 17:1-6. Belete, A., J. Dillion and F. Anderson (1991) Development of Agriculture in Ethiopia since tehe 1975 Land Reform Agricultural Economics, Vol 6, pp. 159-175. Coelli, T.J. (1995) Recent Development in Frontier Modeling and Efficiency Measurement Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39(3): 171-180. Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 546

Daniel,J.D, Adebayo, E. F, Shehu, J. F.,and Tashikalma, A. K., (2013) Technical Efficiency of Resource-use among SugarcaneFarmers in the NorthEast of Adamawa State, Nigeria. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-5521Volume 2, Gwandi.O (2012). Economics of Beniseed (sesamum indicum l) production in mubi region of Adamawa state, NigeriaUnpublished M. Sc thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, SAAT, FUT, Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria Gwandi.O.,Bala.M. and Danbaki. W.J.(2010) Resource Use Efficiency in Cotton Production in Gassol Local Government Area of Taraba State, Nigeria.J.Agric. Soc. Sci.,6:87-90 Ibrahim. A.,Zalkuwi.J.and Yusuf.C.(2014) Technical efficiency of maize in Mubi North Local Government Area of Adamawa State, Nigeria. International Journal of innovative Research and Studies. Volume 3(1); 58-67 Igben, M.S. (1988). The Nigerian Food and raw materials crisis, the Nigerian farmers and agricultural institution: an assessment, Igben, M.S. (ed). Nigeria Institute for Social and Economic Research (NISER), Ibadan, Nigeria pp1-6. Maurice, D.C (2012): Optimal Production Plan and Resource Allocation in Food Crop Production in Adamawa State, Nigeria. An unpublished P.hD Thesis. Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Yola. Ogundari, K. (2008). Resource Productivity, Allocative Efficiency and Determinants of Technical Efficiency of Rain-fed Rice Farmers: A Guide to food Security Policy in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Environment 3(2):26-27. Seyoum, E.T., G.E.Battese and E.M.Fleming(1997) Technical Efficiency and Productivity of Maize Producers in Eastern Ethiopia: A Study of Farmers within and outside the Sasakawa-Global 2000 project, http:/www.une.edu.au/econometrics/cepa.htm. 1997. Shehu, J. F., Tashkalma, A.K. and Gabdo, B. H. (2007a) Efficiency of resource use in small-scale rainfed up land rice production in north-west agricultural zone of Adamawa state- Nigeria. 9 th Annual national proceedings of national association of agricultural economies held at ATBU 1000 seater Theater Bauchi. Zalkuwi.J(2013) Comparative analysis of technical efficiency of sole sorghum and sorghum mixed with cowpea production systems in Guyuk local Government Area of Adamawa state, Nigeria.. International Journal of innovative Research and Studies. Volume 2(12); 558-566 Zalkuwi.J.,Moses.J.D. and Tortange.F.P (2014) Analysis of Resource use in yam production in Ukum Local Government Area of Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal of innovative research and development. Volume 3(8)1-6 Zalkuwi, J. (2012). Comparative Economic Analysis of Sole Sorghum and Sorghum Mixed with Cowpea Production Systems in Guyuk Local Government Area of Adamawa State, Nigeria. Unpublished M. Sc thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, SAAT, FUT, Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria Zalkuwi.J.,Daniel.J.D. and Kwakanapwa.E.(2014) Resource productivity of Maize in Numan Local Government Area of Adamawa State, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication. Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 547