Enhanced Time of Use Electricity Pricing for Industrial Customers in Malaysia

Similar documents
Sustainable Energy Management Practices and Its Effect on EEI: A Study on University Buildings

The Economic Benefits of Generation Revenue Assessment in Pool-Based Market Model for Restructured Electricity Supply Industry

Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option If Done Well

MOHAMED A. M. ALMAKTAR

AMI Billing Regression Study Final Report. February 23, 2016

Power Options. For Oregon Customers. Choosing an Electricity Service Supplier About transition adjustments... 7

Feasibility Study of Grid-Connected Solar Photovoltaic (PV) System for Primary School in Johor

COST REFLECTIVE TARIFF (CRT) Rates as per (2018)

COST REFLECTIVE TARIFF (CRT) Rates as per (2017)

Jurnal Teknologi ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION PATTERN DISAGGREGATION USING NON-INTRUSIVE APPLIANCE LOAD MONITORING METHOD. Full Paper

TOU to CO 2. The Relationship between AMI and Global Warming. Chris King President, emeter Strategic Consulting U.S.A emeter Corporation

CALMAC Study ID PGE0354. Daniel G. Hansen Marlies C. Patton. April 1, 2015

TOU Tariff Analysis and Program Development

Statewide Pricing Pilot (SPP)

RESULTS OF CL&P PLAN-IT WISE ENERGY PILOT

Novel model for defining electricity tariffs using residential load profile characterisation

MADRI. Dynamic Pricing Conference. Eric Matheson May 12,

Power Options. For Oregon Customers. Power Options At a Glance 1. The enrollment process Choosing an Electricity Service Supplier...

EVOENERGY 2017/18 STATEMENT OF TARIFF CLASSES AND TARIFFS

Extending the Energy Box to Isolated Energy Systems

Electricity Industry Act 2000 Dodo Power & Gas Pty Ltd Business Electricity Standing Offer rates effective from 4 July 2012

The ESP Handbook. Chapter 9 Billing under CCA. Version 2.0 May 1, 2015

POWER OPTIONS. For Oregon Customers. Power Options At a Glance 1. Direct Access Getting started...4. Important dates...4

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 68 (2015 )

Quick Start Guide (for PacifiCorp Customers) January, 2011

Smart Pricing Program

P.S.C. NO. 3 ELECTRICITY LEAF: 355 ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. REVISION: 0 SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 22 APPLICABLE TO USE OF SERVICE FOR:

THE RIGHT PRICE. Dynamic pricing can provide benefits to customers and utilities alike. BY LISA V. WOOD

Residential Real-Time Pricing: Bringing Home the Potential

Review of Regulated Retail Electricity Tariffs and Prices

Impact of localised Energy Efficiency (EE) and Renewable Energy (RE) on Ekurhuleni s finances over the next 10 years Report.

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Impact of localised Energy Efficiency (EE) and Renewable Energy (RE) on City of Cape Town s finances over the next 10 years Report.

Rate Design and Resource Planning

Total Monthly Electricity Cost (R)

Measuring public understanding on Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) electricity bills using ordered probit model

Future Network Forum Network Pricing Design

Estimation of Parameters and Flow Characteristics for the Design of Sanitary Sewers in Malaysia

Residential energy, technology adoption and modelling. Sarah Darby University of Oxford

Large General Service Voluntary Time of Use (TOU) Rate Options. Prepared for meeting with CEC January 5, 2017

Consumer-Friendly and Environmentally-Sound Electricity

MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY NANTUCKET ELECTRIC COMPANY TARIFF FOR BASIC SERVICE

Eskom Industry Association Resource Centre. By: Henri Groenewald 29 October 2008

Total Monthly Electricity Cost (R)

GENERAL SERVICE SCHEDULE GS-TOU OPTIONAL GENERAL SERVICE TIME OF USE METERED RATE

SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 21

Revised Proposal Attachment Tariff Structure Statement. January 2019

TOU Rates As If Prices Mattered: Reviving an Industry Standard for Today s Utility Environment

TNB BILLS (OWNER) ENERGY SAVINGS PLAN

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Network Price List and Explanatory Notes

CitiPower Amended Revised Proposed Tariff Structure Statement

Time-Varying and Dynamic Rate Design A RAP Global Series Report

SCHEDULE AL-TOU2 Sheet 1 N

A Hybrid Model for Forecasting Electricity Sales

Open Data Access Framework

Is it time for daily time-of-use electricity pricing? Household response to a pricing experiment

MODELING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF TIM OF USE DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAM TO THE IRAINIAN CONSUMERS WITH CONSIDERING UNCERTAIN PRICE ELASTICITY

Statewide Pricing Pilot (SPP)

EMBEDDED COST OF SERVICE Kim Wissman Executive Director Ohio Power Siting Board On behalf of NARUC

Residential Real-Time Pricing is the Real Deal

The Energy-Smart Pricing Plan SM (ESPP) Real-Time Pricing for Residential Customers. Lawrence Kotewa Senior Engineer and Project Manager

The ESP Handbook. Chapter 15 Obtaining Consumer Usage and Metering Information. Version 7.0 February 1, 2017


Maximizing Consumer Value Through Dynamic Pricing: A Suggested Approach for Regulators

A Research of Real-Time Pricing Mechanism and Its Characteristics

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. Withdrawn Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Critical Peak Pricing Rate Options

The design of TOU tariffs for residential customers

Time-based Pricing Pilot

Description of EDC Data and Documents in the Monthly Data Portion of the BGS Auction Data Room

ATTACHMENT M-2 (PECO) Determination of Capacity Peak Load Contributions, Network Service Peak Load and Hourly Load Obligations PURPOSE

Board of Directors Meeting Thursday, June 15, :00 p.m. Customer Service Center, Rubicon Room

George Ferreira Ex-ED, Electricity and Energy Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality Port Elizabeth, South Africa

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Description of EDC Data and Documents in the Additional Data Portion of the BGS Auction Data Room

SCE and PRIME JOINT RATE COMPARISONS

Tariffs January 1, 2017

Jurnal Teknologi. Efficient Planning of Electrical Distribution System for Consumers in Sarawak, Malaysia. Full paper

MALAYSIAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW. Volume 15 No. 1 June 2016

Working Together to Manage Your Company s Energy Use.

NRS049 ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE (AMI) FOR RESIDENTAIL AND COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS

SCE and CPA JOINT RATE COMPARISONS

PG&E s General Comments on Demand Response Vision Update. January 11, 2008

Counties Power Limited

Review of Salt River Project s Proposed Residential Customer Generation Price Plan. Prepared for Salt River Project

REVISED TARIFF STRUCTURE STATEMENT. ActewAGL Distribution Electricity Network

Key Statistical Data

Demand Response & TOU Pricing

Energia Online. User Guide

October 25, RE: Advice No NEW Schedule 13 Opt-Out Residential Demand Response Testbed Pilot and Application

2016 Fall Reliability Conference MRO

Designing Business Models for different market participants in a hybrid retail energy market

Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E Cancelling Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E

Performance evaluation of an actual building airconditioning

Electricity Distribution Rate Design for Commercial & Industrial Customers

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Increase Type of Power Plant MW Percentage MW Percentage Percentage

Transcription:

Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Vol. 6, No. 1, April 2017, pp. 155 ~ 160 DOI: 10.11591/ijeecs.v6.i1.pp155-160 155 Enhanced Time of Use Electricity Pricing for Industrial Customers in Malaysia Nur Azrina Mohd Azman, Md Pauzi Abdullah*, Mohammad Yusri Hassan, Dalila Mat Said, Faridah Hussin Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Malaysia Centre of Electrical Energy Systems, Institute of Future Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Malaysia *Corresponding author, e-mail: pauzi@fke.utm.my Abstract New Time of Use (ToU) tariff scheme known as Enhanced ToU (EToU) has been introduced on 1st January 2016 for industrial customers in Malaysia. EToU scheme is the advanced version of current ToU where the daily time frame is divided into six period blocks, as compared to only two in the existing ToU. Mid-peak tariff is introduced on top of peak-hour and off-peak tariff. The new scheme is designed to reduce Malaysia s peak hour electricity demand. On customer side, they could be benefited from the low off-peak tariff by simply shifting their consu mption. However, it depends on their consumption profile and their flexibility in shifting their consumption. Since EToU scheme is voluntary, each customer needs to perform cost-benefit analysis before deciding to switch into the scheme. This paper analyzes this problem by considering EToU tariff scheme for industry and customer s electricity consumption profile. Case studies using different practical data from different industries are presented and discussed in this paper Keywords: time-of-use, electricity-consumption, load-profile, industrial-consumer Copyright 2017 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Malaysia s electricity utility company, Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) introduced a new tariff scheme for industrial customer, known as Enhanced Time of Use (EToU). EToU scheme introduced three different rates for electricity consumption rather than only two in conventional ToU scheme. It is consists of, Mid-peak and Off-peak [1]. These rates are applied differently between weekdays and weekend. Maximum charge is waived during weekend. EToU is purposed to encourage customer to use less electricity during peak hour that can reduce their electricity expenses. However, increment of electricity expenses might occur if customer fails to shift their consumption into lower rate hours and causing higher usage during peak hours. Customer must be able to analyses their daily consumption carefully in order to achieve the benefit. This paper analyse the impact of the new EToU scheme on the electricity bill of two different industrial customers with different load profile. It will help customers to identify the benefit of the EToU scheme and decide whether to switch into the scheme or remain to the old TOU scheme. This paper consists of 5 sections. Concept of ToU is discussed in Section 2. The detail of industrial customer in Malaysia is explained in section 3. The case study and the result obtained for industrial customer using EToU is presented in section 4. Lastly, section 5 concludes the paper. Basically, electricity demand would be very high when the customers using the appliances at the same time. Based on the theories, the higher the power transmitted, the higher the values of resistance that exist throughout the system. This scenario is known as the peak period and this would lead to the increment of the utilities cost as well as the total transmission loss [2]. Throughout the day or season, there would be peak and off-peak period. In fixed tariff program, higher tariff would be implemented in order to cover on the utility cost and the total loss. This gave disadvantage to both utility and customer at the same time. The disadvantage could be solved by few types of time-based electricity tariff. One of the types is known as Real- Time pricing (RTP). This type of time-based electricity tariff reflects the current electricity market Received November 17, 2016; Revised February 5, 2017; Accepted February 19, 2017

156 ISSN: 2502-4752 structure. It is a dynamic rate where it is designed to reflect the balance of supply and demand. Each day, every hour gives different prices that is according to the real market clearing price [3]. On the other hand, ToU is defined as a long term pricing method that gives different prices based on time of day. This method reflects only in long term electricity power system cost [3]. ToU works when there is load shifting accurately done by customer. Load shifting is the method where customers were encouraged to change their time of electricity usage according to the electricity price implement by the utility in daily period so that the electricity demand could be stabilized throughout the day. However, both electricity tariff, RTP and ToU have their own advantages as well as the drawbacks of each system. Table 1 summarize on the advantages and disadvantage of both RTP and ToU electricity tariff [4]. In order to encourage the customer to shift their electricity usage, a good price signal should be obtained accurately. Time of use electricity tariff program is one of the price signals that should be implemented by utility for the customer. Time of use consist of different electricity price in different periods of time. Smart metering system is given to the customer to enable them to track their electricity usage based on the announced price that is given by utility form time to time [3]. The role of this metering system is critical as it gives the customer idea on how they can plan their electricity usage based on their appliances consumption. In a simple time of use program, the period blocks in a day only divided into two known as peak and off-peak period. Higher price would be given to the peak period while lower price can be obtained in the off-peak period [3]. The indication of the price is based on the average electricity price. The signal price given in the time of use program essentially purposed to ensure the load shifting to be success. The expected outcome of the time of use program is that it should encourage the customers to shift their consumption to the period with lower price of electricity. By this change, the total consumption during the peak period and off-peak period can be stabilized that could give the average cost needed for the utility. The ToU rates will always depend on the daily load consumption of customers. Different rates are usually given to residential, commercial and industrial customer. Table 1. Advantages and Disadvantages of Time-Based Electricity Tariff [4] Time-based Electricity Tariff Advantages Disadvantages Real-Time Pricing (RTP) Time Of Use (ToU) *Possibility of good planning for customer *Integration of renewable energy sources (RES) can be supported *Possibility of good planning for customer *Implementation is easy *More complicated to be implement * demand is risk to increase *Accurate communication and metering is needed *Reflection on the supply/demand is limited *Integration of renewable energy sources (RES) support is limited 2. Research Method Industrial customer typically divided into few categories. It is defined by the electrical usage in their premises. The definition of each category is being explained in Table 2: Table 2. Categories of Industrial Tariff [1] Tariff Categories Usage D Low Voltage Industrial Tariff Ds E1 E1s E2 E2s E3 E3s Medium Voltage General Industrial Tariff Medium Voltage /Off- Industrial Tariff High Voltage /Off- Industrial Tariff IJEECS Vol. 6, No. 1, April 2017 : 155 160

IJEECS ISSN: 2502-4752 157 Industrial customers that consume high voltage electricity are categorized in E3 customer. This paper focused on the customer with E3 categories and analyses the impact of changing into EToU scheme according to their daily usage in the case study. Table 3 and 4 presented the period block of ToU and electricity prices that has been used for industrial customer in other countries as well as the period block and electricity prices that is being implemented in EToU scheme. The comparison between old ToU scheme and EToU for industrial customer with E3 category is shown in Table 4. Table 3. ToU Period Blocks in Selected Countries [5-9] No 1 Table 4. ToU Prices in Selected Countries Country Sri Lanka (Ceylon Electricity Board) [9] 2 South Africa [6] 3 4 5 New Jersey, Pennsylvina, New York (Orange & Rockland) [8] California (PG&E) [7] Malaysia (ToU) [5] Malaysia (EToU) [5] *Industrial customers at high voltage (tariff E3) Time of Use Electricity Details Period Mid- Off- Mid- Off- Mid- Off- Price Rs23.00/kWh Rs7.30/kWh Rs5.30/kWh c24123/kwh c7774/kwh c4526/kwh $1.29/kWh $1.29/kWh $0.113/kWh $0.25/kWh Mid- $0.23/kWh Off- $0.20/kWh - Mid- $0.22/kWh Off- $0.19/kWh 0.337/kWh Mid- 0.202/kWh 0.39/kWh Mid- 0.31/kWh Off- 0.202/kWh 3. Results and Analysis This paper is the first to discuss on the EToU electricity tariff introduced by TNB Malaysia. Hence, the comparison for this case study can on only be done according to the simulation of load profile of few customers and the data received from TNB on the rate of EToU Enhanced Time of Use Electricity Pricing for Industrial Customers in (Md Pauzi Abdullah)

158 ISSN: 2502-4752 electricity tariff. Case study for this paper uses the data of load profile from two type of industrial customer. The first case study involve an oil and gas factory located in northern region of Malaysia; while the other one is a manufacturing factory located in southern region of Malaysia. 3.1 Case Study 1 Figure 1 shows the hourly electricity consumption of the building from an oil and gas factory during weekdays and weekend. A selected Monday is selected as the weekday data while Saturday as weekend data. To ease the calculation, it is assumed that the profile for weekdays and weekends are the same throughout a month. It can be seen that the electricity consumption for this building does not provide a specific pattern as the hourly consumption is observed high and low at a random point of the day. The highest consumption is during weekend. This shows that this building is operating regularly throughout the month without implementing any working hour. Figure 1. The Hourly Electricity Consumption of an Oil and Gas Factory The hourly electricity consumption is then being analysed using the ToU and EToU data from TNB and the monthly total electricity bill is then being compared in the bar chart shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. Electricity Bill Comparison for Oil and Gas Factory for ToU and EToU with and without load shifting Figure 2 shows the electricity bill based on the customer usage from Figure 1. The horizontal axis of the bar chart is defined as the electricity scheme used by customer together with their total load shifting in a month. For example, ToU is defined as the customers total bill when customer used ToU scheme while EToU with 5% shift is defined as the customers total bill when customer change into EToU scheme and shift 5% of their total load from peak period into mid-peak period. In the bar chart, it is shown that the customer can opt to change into EToU scheme if they can shift 20% of their electricity consumption during peak period into mid peak period. This is because it can be observed that when a customer change from ToU into EToU scheme without shifting their electricity usage period from peak to mid peak or from peak to off peak, the electricity bill gives higher amount than the ToU electricity bill. Greater amount of IJEECS Vol. 6, No. 1, April 2017 : 155 160

IJEECS ISSN: 2502-4752 159 saving can be achieved when customer able to shift their usage period during peak hour to off peak period. 3.2. Case Study 2 Case study 2 presents the electricity consumption pattern of a manufacturing factory. This customer consumes higher range of electricity compare to customer in case study 1. Figure 3 illustrates the hourly electricity consumption of the manufacturing factory. Figure 3. The Hourly Electricity Consumption of a Manufacturing Factory The electricity consumption during weekday is observed higher compare to weekend consumption. The highest electricity consumption is during working hours. While during weekend, the electricity consumption remains lower than weekday throughout the day. This shows that this factory operates mainly during weekday. The electricity consumption data is then being analyses into monthly electricity bill and the comparison of the data is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4. Electricity Bill Comparison for Manufacturing Factory for ToU and EToU with and without load shifting The horizontal axis of the bar chart in Figure 4 is defined as the electricity scheme used by customer together with their total load shifting in a month. For example, ToU is defined as the customers total bill when customer used ToU scheme while EToU with 5% shift is defined as the customers total bill when customer change into EToU scheme and shift 5% of their total load from peak period into mid-peak period. Based on Figure 4, if customer change into EToU scheme without making any load shifting, it will gives higher electricity bill. Load shifting of minimum 70% from peak to mid peak is required in order for the customer to gain saving of 20325.61 from the old ToU scheme s electricity bill. When shifting the electricity consumption from peak to off peak, only 50% of the load needed to be shift in order to gain lower electricity bill. This would mean that this customer needs to change most of their working hour in order to gain benefit from the EToU program. Based on the assessment, the customer is advised to stays with the old ToU scheme if they are unable to shift their electricity consumption during peak period to mid peak or off peak period. Enhanced Time of Use Electricity Pricing for Industrial Customers in (Md Pauzi Abdullah)

160 ISSN: 2502-4752 4. Conclusion The paper is focused on helping customer to choose to change into new EToU scheme or stick with the old ToU scheme. The finding has compared the electricity bill for ToU and EToU scheme for two industrial customers. Based on the result, it can be seen that an industrial customer can change into EToU scheme if they can shift their load consumption from peak to mid peak according to their load profile. More comprehensive research can be done in order to analyses more method that can help customer in choosing the scheme based in their daily load profile. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) vot 4F746. References [1] TN Berhad. (2016, 4th May 2016). Tnb Enhanced Time of Use (Etou). Available: Https://Www.Tnb.Com.My/Faq/Etou [2] MPANS Hussin, AIMAli, MY Hassan, F Hussin, Residential Electricity Time of Use (Tou) Pricing for Malaysia, Cencon. 2014. [3] MPANSM. Nazar, MY Hassan, F Hussin, Time-Based Electricity Pricing For Demand Response Implementation In Monopolized Electricity Market, IEEE Student Conference On Research And Development (Scored). 2012. [4] D Steen, T Le, L Bertling, Price-Based Demand-Side Management For Reducing Demand In Electrical Distribution Systems With Examples From Gothenburg, In Nordac. 2012. [5] S Tenaga. (4th May 2016). Enhanced Time Of Use Etou Tariff Scheme. Available: Http://Www.St.Gov.My/Index.Php/Download-Page/Category/124-Sesi-Penerangan-Sit-Dan-Etou.Html [6] E Municipality. (11 March 2016). Electricity Tariffs 2015-2016. Available: Http://Www.Durban.Gov.Za/Resource_Centre/Services_Tariffs/Electricityhttp://Www.Durban.Gov.Za/ Resource_Centre/Services_Tariffs/Electricitytariffs/Electricitytariffs2015-2016.Pdf [7] PGAE Company. (11 March 2016). Time-Of-Use Plans. Available: Http://Www.Pge.Com/En/Mybusiness/Rates/Tvp/Toupricing.Page [8] O Rockland. (10 March 2016). Tariffs & Regulatory Documents. Available: Http://Www.Oru.Com/Programsandservices/Timeofuserate/ [9] CE Board. (11 March 2016). Tariff Plan. Available: Http://Www.Pucsl.Gov.Lk/English/Wp- Content/Uploads/2014/03/2009-Tariff-Notice.Pdf IJEECS Vol. 6, No. 1, April 2017 : 155 160