MPC 6.a - Attachment 2 - All STP-U/TAP Funding Applications Page 118 of 128. STP-U & TAP Application Form Page 1 of 6. Tom Boyatt or Brian Barnett

Similar documents
Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

Appendix O Level of Service Standard and Measurements

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

2. Goals and Objectives

There are two (2) amendments for which staff is requesting recommendation to the Transportation Policy Council this month:

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

UNIT V TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

MEMORANDUM #4. DATE: November 4, Warrenton TSP Project Management Team. Ray Delahanty, AICP, DKS Associates Kate Petak, EIT, DKS Associates

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Chapter 2 Transportation Policy Plan Strategies

Joint Meeting- Stakeholder Committee & Technical Committee

The Role of Transportation Systems Management & Operations in Supporting Livability and Sustainability

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050

MPO Member Communities:

10.0 Congestion Management Process

Appendix B. OKI 2030 Regional Transportation Plan Project Scoring Process. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan

PLAN 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Final Recommendations. Transportation and Air Quality Committee March 13, 2014

2018 Comprehensive Guide Plan Steering Committee. Wednesday, October 11, Minnehaha Room, Minnetonka City Hall. 6:00 8:00 p.m.

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

Section 11: Transportation Strategies Toolbox

PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE I 76 INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROJECT TO THE CONNECTIONS 2040 PLAN FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

Bridges Prioritizing Criteria and Measures

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP

City of Berkeley. Guidelines for Development of Traffic Impact Reports

Traffic Signal Timing: What s Your Priority? Transportation Education Series May 8, 2012

FY 2019 Unified Planning Work Program FINAL. Regional Intergovernmental Council. June 14, Kanawha Putnam Metropolitan Planning Organization

INCIDENT MANAGEMENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSM&O) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT SIX

EIGHT PLANNING FACTORS

NEED ECONOMIC TRANSPORTATION LOCATIONS EXAMPLE

CHAPTER 4. Existing Roadway Conditions. Highway Element. Kanawha County Putnam County

TRB WEBINAR PROGRAM Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual: Contents

Chapter 2 Transportation Element Goals, Objectives and Policies

HORIZON 2030: Plan Projects November 2005

HCM 6th Edition Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide (PPEAG) to the HCM Bringing Back-of-the-Envelope Back.

Corridor Planning Standards + Potential Performance Measures

Regional Transportation Performance Measures

Project Initiation Form

Northern Virginia Region Draft Needs Summary

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

FHWA COST EFFECTIVENESS TABLES SUMMARY

CHAPTER 5. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Transportation Goals & Objectives

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM

1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 CTPS

Project Prioritization for Urban and Rural Projects TEAM CONFERENCE March 7, 2018

DIVISION I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES ENGINEERING STANDARDS

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DES MOINES AREA MPO. Environment Roundtable. October 13, 2015

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

Kentucky River Area Development District

7.0 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

February For more information, contact: Mark Paine, (513)

TRANSFORM66: OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY

Des Moines Area MPO. MPO Planning Subcommittee Meeting March 3, Des M oines Area M etropolitan Planning Organization

CHAPTER 3.0 CIRCULATION ELEMENT

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Draft Strategic Mobility Plan Short-Term Action Plan 2018 to 2022

Funding Intelligent Transportation Systems in the Los Angeles Region

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Traffic Data Quality Analysis. James Sturrock, PE, PTOE, FHWA Resource Center Operations Team

Effective Transportation Demand Management (TDM) in Congested Corridors US 422 TDM Best Practices Policy Brief and Recommendations

Utilizing Transportation Data for Low Cost Safety Improvements

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Association for Commuter Transportation Recommendations to USDOT on MAP-21 Performance Measures

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

MARC Congestion Management Process Policy

SECTION III - REGIONAL ARTERIAL SYSTEM. The Regional Arterial System is a subcomponent of a broader regional thoroughfare system.

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS APPENDIX

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAC August 2, 2017

Congestion Management Strategy

Safety Performance Management Targets. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

Transportation Concurrency

Transportation Concurrency

Grottoes. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

Consequences of Sprawl

Developing New Revenue Streams For Transit

Congestion Management Process. Procedures and Responsibilities Report

Arterial Traffic Control: Advancing Mobility. 1980s, Now, and Beyond

Federal Fiscal Year Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program Pre- Applications

CHARTING PROGRESS TO 2040 RESULTS OF MINI-SURVEYS

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE

Database and Travel Demand Model

2.0 ACCESS OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES AND STRATEGIES

Technical Memorandum#1A

The Complete Trip - a Transit Driven Movement towards a Seamless Total Travel Experience

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

Transcription:

MPC 6.a - Attachment 2 - All STP-U/TAP Funding Applications Page 118 of 128 STP-U & TAP Application Form Page 1 of 6 APPLICATION FOR: STP U FUNDS (Project Development, Preservation, Modernization) TAP FUNDS (Transportation Alternatives Program) FY 2016 2018 Project Information Project Title: Traffic Signal Systems Modernization Agency Applying: City of Springfield Applying for STP or TAP: STP Fiscal Year(s): 2016 2017 Staff Contact: Tom Boyatt or Brian Barnett 541 744 3373 or Staff Phone: 541.726.3681 Staff Email: tboyatt@springfield or.gov or bbarnett@springfield or.gov Project Type: Mode: Preservation Modernization Project Development Other Roadway Transit Bike/Ped Other Project Description: The project is the first phase of a city wide project to replace outmoded traffic signal cabinets and controllers, and communication systems. Congested corridors will be targeted to achieve maximum public traveler benefit. Description of Need or Problem Existing traffic control systems use 170 model controllers that are operationally and functionally obsolete and use 1970 s technology. Communications between controllers and the City of Springfield s central management computer uses serial modems across narrow gauge wire (similar to telephone wire) resulting in low speeds and low throughput. Both of these systems were installed decades ago and require replacement due to physical failure that has become prevalent. Catastrophic failure of controllers and cabinets regularly occur causing substantial disruption to travelers at unplanned times. Replacement of components and subsystems is on an ad hoc basis precluding improving the systems comprehensively thus missing a valuable opportunity to improve system reliability and efficiency. Technical advancements in controller and communication technology afford the ability to enhance communication to drivers, system operators, collect and analyze data that can then be used to reduce travel delay and uncertainty, and increase agency service delivery efficiency. Eligibility YES NO RTP Is the project listed in, consistent with, or able to be added to financially constrained RTP, during project time frame? Timeliness. Does the agency have the ability to utilize funds in FY requested? Federal Eligibility. Is project eligible for STP U or TAP funding under Federal guidelines 1 Local Match. Can agency provide minimum required matching funds (10.27% of project total)? Sufficient Funding. Has sufficient funding been identified to complete project/phase 1 For STP U, see http://www.lcog.org/agendacenter/viewfile/item/1558?fileid=7308

MPC 6.a - Attachment 2 - All STP-U/TAP Funding Applications Page 119 of 128 STP-U & TAP Application Form Page 2 of 6 For TAP, see http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/guidance/guidetap.cfm

MPC 6.a - Attachment 2 - All STP-U/TAP Funding Applications Page 120 of 128 STP-U & TAP Application Form Page 3 of 6 Cost Estimate/Funding Needs Total Estimated Project Cost $279,000 Funding Available $29,000 Source: Street Fund $ Source: $ Source: Amount of STP U/TAP Request (Indicate to the right funding source requested) $250,000 STP U Note: Total non federal funding must meet minimum match requirement of 10.27% of Total Project Cost. PRESERVES EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ASSETS Goal: Increase travel time reliability and decrease travel time by improving system reliability, communication, data gathering and processing. Reduce equipment failure, downtime, and disruption to travel by motor vehicle, bicycle and transit bus. Roadway Transit Route Bike Lanes Multi Use Path Functional Class: PCI: Minor Arterials & Major Collectors Transit Volume: Freight Volume: Traffic Volume: 10,000 to 18,000 AADT Bike/Ped Counts: Replacing controllers, cabinets and communications equipment will allow for more advanced signal timing, data collection, trouble shooting, and extend the capacity of the travel lanes thus avoiding calls to expand the number of lanes to increase capacity. Unplanned replacement of equipment will be avoided thus reducing extended, untimely and unforeseen congestion from equipment failure. PRESERVES OR ENHANCES TRANSIT SERVICES Goal: Maintain or increase transit ridership. Existing ridership: Projected ridership Existing service hrs: Ex. area of service: Title VI Issues: Proj. service hrs: Proj. service area: Title VI Issues:

MPC 6.a - Attachment 2 - All STP-U/TAP Funding Applications Page 121 of 128 STP-U & TAP Application Form Page 4 of 6 IMPROVES SAFETY Goals: Reduce the number and severity of accidents involving pedestrians, bicyclists, and/or vehicles. Address areas perceived to have safety issues to increase the use of multi use paths. Roadway Multi Use Path Sidewalk Mixed Vehicular Crash Data: Varies Traffic Volume: 10,000 to 18,000 AADT Bicycle Crash Data: Pedestrian Crash Data: Transit Volume: Bike/Ped Counts: Safety will be improved by having controllers, software and communications that is more efficient to maintain traffic signal timing and less prone to failure. Traffic incidents cause over half of all congestion and this project will reduce the equipment failures that cause incidents. Signals malfunctions can create conditions leading to pedestrian, bicyclist, and driver collisions. REDUCES GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Goals: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing congestion, increasing operational efficiency, supporting alternative modes, and managing transportation demand. Congestion Reduction Operational Efficiency Alternative Modes Trans. Demand Management (TDM) Efficiently operating traffic signals significantly reduces congestion. Installing equipment that enhances data collection, communication efficiency, and traffic conditions analysis increases operational efficiency for the driver and decreases systemic and spot congestion. Malfunctioning signals significantly increase congestion. Replacing equipment that is at the end of its useful life will increase system reliability assuring the street user of reliable and safe travel times.

MPC 6.a - Attachment 2 - All STP-U/TAP Funding Applications Page 122 of 128 STP-U & TAP Application Form Page 5 of 6 Additional Project Benefits Connectivity Will completed project fill in key gaps in the transportation system, complete system components, or provide better pedestrian, bicycle, or roadway connectivity at a regional scale? Multiple Modes How will completed project benefit more than one mode or purpose (i.e., roadway & transit, bicycle & roadway users, or roadway & identified freight route)? All user modes benefit from safe, consistent, always on systems. Transit travel times will be more consistent enabling more precise schedule and route planning. Pedestrians will be less likely to cross an intersection with a malfunctioning signal that doesn t have any pedestrian indications operating. Bicyclists will have similar benefits to pedestrians. Vehicle drivers will benefit from all of the above and experience less stops and starts that cause pollutant emissions and fuel use to increase, and can lead to rear end collisions. Congestion Reduction Will completed project reduce congestion through provision of additional capacity or critical link or other means? This project will increase user throughput by more efficiently and reliably using the street capacity presently built. Freight Will completed project improve the freight system and freight movement? This project will increase user throughput by more efficiently and reliably using the street capacity presently built. Stops and starts are particular costly to heavy vehicles in fuel used, maintenance of brake and driveline systems and lost time. Public Health Will the completed project provide public health benefits? This project will reduce congestion and resultant pollution and result in localized air quality benefits. Economic Development Will the completed project promote or support economic development? Other Are there other benefits that the completed project will provide? Other Project Information Scope of improvement, i.e., regional, community, neighborhood, local Community Ratio of STP U Overhead to Overall Project Cost

MPC 6.a - Attachment 2 - All STP-U/TAP Funding Applications Page 123 of 128 STP-U & TAP Application Form Page 6 of 6 Less than 10% Opportunity Costs, i.e., cost of not doing activity/project The opportunity cost of not doing this project could be high. The concern is that continued underinvestment in traffic signals and communications will result in increasing number of unexpected equipment failures. Unplanned replacement is always more costly and more disruptive to traffic flow and is not as safe as a managed shut down of a signal for equipment replacement. APPLICATION DUE DATE: JULY 24, 2015 PLEASE SUBMIT APPLICATION ELECTRONICALLY TO PAUL THOMPSON, LCOG pthompson@lcog.org C:\Users\clpl115\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\VEYRUTEC\MPC5 f-attachment2-stp-u_tap_applicationform.docx Last Saved: August 25, 2015