Maximizing Pavement Life Mark D. Blow, P.E. Asphalt Institute

Similar documents
59 th Annual Meeting. Pavement Design Reminders. Prevent Thermal Cracking. Iowa HIPRO Thin Lifts. WisDOT Binder regions

Polymer Modified Asphalt Performance. Gary L. Fitts, P.E. Sr. Field Engineer Asphalt Institute

Quantifying the Benefits of Polymer Modified Asphalt

Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Engineered Pavements

Easy-To-Use Perpetual Pavement Design Software

National Performance of High Recycled Mixtures

Using Perpetual Pavement Concepts. John Hickey Asphalt Pavement Association of Oregon

Assorted Asphalt Issues

No deep structural distress

Historical Performance of Polymer Modified Asphalt Pavements: Part I. Laurand Lewandowski, Ph.D. Goodyear Chemical June 23, 2004

Current Status and Future of Asphalt Recycling in the USA. Randy C. West, Ph.D., P.E. Director & Research Professor

Using Perpetual Pavement Concepts. John Hickey Asphalt Pavement Association of Oregon

Full Scale Accelerated Pavement Test. Experimental Design and Timeline

NCHRP UPDATE 2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA. Our Visit. Special Thanks. 9-22: Performance Related Specification for HMA

Thin Asphalt Overlays for Pavement Preservation

Plantmix Asphalt Industry of Kentucky Winter Meeting February 10, 2011

Thomas Bennert, Rutgers University Robert Sauber, NJDOT (Retired) CAIT RUTGERS. NEAUPG October 6-7th, 2010 Saratoga Springs, NY

Asphalt Performance Testing

2010 Midwestern Pavement Preservation Partnership Conference

Thinlay Asphalt for Pavement Preservation

NJ I-295: A Perpetual Pavement Design and Construction Project

Verification of Gyration Levels in the Superpave

Design Criteria and Testing for Cold In-Place Recycling. Todd Thomas Technical Services Engineer Colas Solutions, Inc.

Use of High Contents of Reclaimed Asphalt (RAP) in Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Pavements

Bonded HMA Overlays a matter of tack materials & method of application

Long Life Pavement Fundamentals

Impact of Subgrade Strength on HMA Section Thickness

GET IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME:

LONG TERM PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE PROGRAM DIRECTIVE. Program Area: General Operations Directive Number: GO-09. Date: September 14, 1998 Supersedes: S-2

Acceptance Testing and Variability Impacts on Construction Operation

MnDOT Implementation of the Multi-Stress Creep Asphalt Binder Specification

NCHRP 9-49A Project Update: Performance of WMA Technologies: Stage II Long-term Field Performance. Binder ETG Meeting Oklahoma City, OK Sept 15, 2015

MIX DESIGN FOR HMA RECYCLING. Rebecca McDaniel North Central Superpave Center

2016 Local Roads Workshop Selecting the Right Mix for Your Project MICHIGAN RIDES ON US

HMA & WMA Technologies. Kent R. Hansen, P.E. Director of Engineering National Asphalt Pavement Association

THINLAY ASPHALT FOR PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

HPTO High Performance Thin Overlay Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conf. Denver, CO Feb. 20, 2009 Frank Fee NuStar Asphalt Refining

Introduction to PAVEXpress Pavement Design. December 6, 2018

Binder and Mixture ETG Update

National Asphalt Roadmap

CANADIAN USER PRODUCER GROUP FOR ASPHALT 2010 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT

SHRP2 R21 Composite Pavement Systems Project Overview

Design Considerations for Perpetual Pavements. Gary L. Fitts, P.E. Sr. Field Engineer Asphalt Institute

National Center for Asphalt Technology Test Track Update. Dr. David Timm, P.E. Wisconsin Asphalt Pavement Association Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Transfer Functions in ME Design

SUPERPAVE FACT SHEET

A Practical Look at Pennsylvania s Bradford Bypass A Perpetual Pavement State Route 0219, Sections C09 & D09

ASPHALT: INNOVATION & SOLUTIONS. Bill Rosener Executive Vice President Asphalt Paving Association of Iowa

Development and Implementation of the Superpave System in the USA And its Relationship to Pavement Design

Experience with RAP and RAS at the MnROAD Research Facility. Tim Clyne NCAUPG Technical Conference January 23, 2013

A Simplified Pavement Design Tool

SEAUPG 2009 CONFERENCE-HILTON HEAD ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA

Introduction to Asphalt Pavement Design and Specifications

2016 Local Roads Workshop PaveXpress Update MICHIGAN RIDES ON US

Mix Design Issues for. In-Place Recycling Products

Asphalt Pavements The Best Value for Michigan Taxpayers

Overview. Preventive Maintenance Concepts. What are thin and ultra thin mixes. Experience in Michigan with ultra thin

AMERICA RIDES ON US KEYS TO A SUCCESSFUL ALTERNATE BIDDING PROCESS

THIN ASPHALT OVERLAYS FOR PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

U.S. National Overview Cold-In Place- Recycling. Laramie, Wyoming 18 th July 2013

Reducing Mix Designs: Using a Single N design. Brian D. Prowell, PhD, PE

Cold In-Place Recycling with Expanded Asphalt B-335 COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING WITH EXPANDED ASPHALT OPSS 335

The State of RAP. in America

Lecture 1. Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG): Overview MEPDG 1

Using Pavement Management Data to Determine Asphalt Pavement Performance Cycles

Pavement Materials, Design & Performance Overview

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MIXTURES CONTAINING RAP

Field and Laboratory Evaluation of Plant Produced Highly Modified Thin Lift Overlay Mixtures Incorporating RAP

Materials Selection in Pavement Design. Flexible Pavements

Long Term Aging & Rheological Parameters. Matthew Corrigan, P.E. Amir Golalipour, Ph.D.

2016 Local Roads Workshop Perpetual Pavement MICHIGAN RIDES ON US

Balanced Asphalt Mixture Design National Overview

Improving Hot Mix Asphalt Performance with SUPERPAVE

Pavement Preservation and Thin Lift Asphalt NCAUPG and Illinois Bituminous Paving Conference February 3, 2015

Balanced Asphalt Mixture Design A Formula for Success

NCHRP Asphalt Research. April 2015

Sensitivity Study of Design Input Parameters for Two Flexible Pavement Systems Using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide

Perpetual Pavements. Perpetual Pavements Local Roads Workshop MICHIGAN RIDES ON US

Asphalt Pavement Highlights

Thinlay Asphalt for Pavement Preservation

Canadian Case Study for Perpetual Pavements Design

WAPA Annual Conference December 1, Barry Paye, P.E. Wisconsin DOT

THIN ASPHALT OVERLAYS FOR PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

Foreword... iii Table of Contents...v List of Figures...vii List of Tables...viii. Chapter 1 : Background...1

2002 SEAUPG Meeting. Southeastern Asphalt User/Producer Group (SEAUPG) SEAUPG 2002 CONFERENCE FLORIDA FLORIDA. Central Sub-Group

Performance Characteristics of Liquid and Lime-Treated Asphalt Mixtures

Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers

Impacts of Pavement Preservation and Recycled Materials on Sustainability. Todd Thomas, P.E. Laboratory Director Colas Solutions, Inc.

The California Asphalt Pavement Association. February 2, 2017 WRAPP Pavement Preservation Workshop Doubletree Ontario Airport, Ontario, CA

PERFORMANCE OF COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING IN NEVADA

Performance Related Specifications (PRS) in the Northeast Hot Mix Asphalt Perspective

ME Design. Reporting Issues SEAUPG ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 13,

UPDATE ON RAP EXPERT TASK GROUP. Northeast Asphalt User Producer Group Meeting Atlantic City, New Jersey October 8, 2008

OFFICE OF MATERIALS & SURFACING DOT. Connecting South Dakota and the Nation. Asphalt Conference. April 6, Rick Rowen. SDDOT Bituminous Engineer

57 th Annual PAPA Conference Hershey, Pennsylvania. Dr. Randy West, P.E. Director / Research Professor

Asphalt Rubber: The Arizona Experience. Julie Kliewer, Ph.D., PE Arizona Department of Transportation

UPTiM Unified Performance Tests using incremental Method

LIME IN HOT MIX ASPHALT THE TEXAS EXPERIENCE. Darren Hazlett P.E. Retired Director Texas Department of Transportation Construction Division

Pavement Design Overview. Rebecca S. McDaniel March 10, 2011

Layer Coefficient Calibration of Fiber Reinforced Asphalt Concrete Based On Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide

Transcription:

58 th Annual IAC Maximizing Pavement Life Mark D. Blow, P.E. Asphalt Institute Maximizing Pavement Life Part 1 Considerations for Pavement Design Mark D. Blow P.E. Sr. Regional Engineer Asphalt Institute Oct. 25, 2018 Moscow, Idaho

A.K.A.- How To Design, Construct and Maintain HMA Pavements to Maximize Pavement Life

Pavement Design 1. Binder Type 2. Pavement Thickness 3. Lift Thickness & Mix Type

Binder Type Design - Section 1

Prevent Thermal Cracking Use PG -34 Binders on New Construction 25 year old SHRP recommendation LTPPBind v3.1 https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/page/index/ltpp_bind

On overlays Consider high performance binders on overlays Reduced rutting Reduced cracking Better crack seal performance Maintain existing crack resistance PG 64-22 modified, no rutting PG 67-22 unmodified, 15mm rut

Better Joint Performance I-29 North of Beresford Orig. 1962 PCC 1999-3 HMA 2004 1.5 Class S PG 70-28 2004 Saw/Seal 2009 Sealed secondary cracks

But what does it cost? 2016 SDDOT Ave. Unit Bid Prices Description Unit Total Quantity Average Bid Price PG 58-28 Asphalt Binder Ton 15,547.30 $433.74 PG 58-34 Asphalt Binder Ton 125,661.00 $485.86 PG 64-22 Asphalt Binder Ton 519.60 $470.63 PG 64-28 Asphalt Binder Ton 182,175.80 $457.38 PG 64-34 Asphalt Binder Ton 61,502.20 $499.15 Highest to Lowest Difference = $65.41/ binder ton @ 6% Binder = $3.92 / ton of mix

Simple county overlay 10 mile overlay, No milling Item Quantity Units Unit Price Amount % of Project Cost PG64-28 1,575.50 Ton $ 462.07 $ 727,991.29 48.5% Class E Mix 25,627.20 Ton $ 22.82 $ 584,812.70 39.0% % Binder 6.1% Tot. Mix Cost = $ 1,312,803.99 87.5% Tot Project Cost = $ 1,500,814.57 100.0% Assuming a $65.41 binder cost increase, Expected Service Needed increase in Life (Years) Life (Years) Binder cost increase 14.2% 15 1.0 Project cost increase 6.9% 20 1.4 25 1.7

Complicated Interstate overlay 20 + mile overlay, underdrains etc. Item Quantity Units Unit Price Amount % of Project Cost PG64-28 1,823.80 Ton $ 400.00 $ 729,520.00 3% PG64-34 11,152.60 Ton $ 430.00 $ 4,795,618.00 21% Tot Project Cost = $ 22,565,024.00 Assuming a $65.41 binder cost increase, Expected Service Needed increase in Life (Years) Life (Years) Binder cost increase 15.4% 15 0.6 Project cost increase 3.8% 20 0.8 25 0.9

Smaller Urban / Grading 1 mile 3-Lane, grading, C&G, sidewalks, lighting and new asphalt surface Item Quantity Units Unit Price Amount % of Project Cost PG58-28 447.70 Ton $ 730.00 $ 326,821.00 9.3% Class HR 9,518.50 Ton $ 33.00 $ 314,110.50 8.9% % Binder 4.7% Tot. Mix Cost = $ 640,931.50 18.2% Tot Project Cost = $ 3,521,707.00 Assuming a $65.41 binder mix cost increase, Expected Service Needed increase in Life (Years) Life (Years) Binder cost increase 9.0% 15 0.12 Project cost increase 0.8% 20 0.17 25 0.21

LTPP Studies Quantifying the Effects of PMA for Reducing Pavement Distress IS 215 12 ER 215 This study (published in Feb 2005) used national field data to determine enhanced service life of pavements containing polymer modified binders versus conventional binders. The data is from a variety of climates and traffic volumes within North America.

Summary of Expected Increase in Service Life, Years, Based on M-E Damage Based Analysis Assumptions: Unmodified sections designed for 20 yr. life. Also, PMA in top 4 inches. Site Factor Condition Description Added Life Foundation Water Table & Drainage Existing Pavement Condition Non-expansive, coarse soils 5-10 Expansive and plastic soils (PI>35) 2-5 Frost Susceptible in cold climate 2-5 Deep 5-10 Shallow; adequate 5-8 Shallow; inadequate 0-2 HMA PCC Good 5-10 Poor-extensive cracking 1-3 Good 3-6 Poor-faulting & cracking 0-2

Continued: Summary of Expected Increase in Service Life, Yrs Assumptions: Unmodified sections designed for 20 yr. life. Also, PMA in top 4 inches. Site Factor Condition Description Added Life Climate; Hot Hot Extremes 5-10 Temp. Mild 2-5 Fluctuations Cold Cold Extremes 3-6 Intersections 5-10 Low Thoroughfares 3-6 Traffic, Truck Heavy Loads 5-10 Volumes Moderate 5-10 High 5-10

Recycled Binders

NCHRP Project D9-12 NCHRP REPORT 452 - Results Blending occurs at higher RAP contents. At low RAP contents, effects are not significant. Results from all phases support concept of a tiered system. Mix ETG recommendations were largely confirmed.

NCHRP 9-12 Recommendations RAP mixtures should be able to perform at least as well as virgin mixes. ACTION No Change in Binder Grade RAP 15% or less One Grade Lower 16-25% Use Blending Charts >25% Adopted in AASHTO M323 Superpave Volumetric Mix Design

Moderation is the key

Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC Engineering Services for the Asphalt Industry

Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC Engineering Services for the Asphalt Industry

Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC Engineering Services for the Asphalt Industry

Thickness Design Design - Section 2

Pavement Design A Simplified Pavement Design Tool www.pavexpressdesign.com

MEPDG (AASHTO 2000) AASHTO has been developing MEPDG for high volume roads, but a gap has developed for local roads and lower volume roads. www.pavexpressdesign.com 27

What Is PaveXpress? A free, online tool to help you create simplified pavement designs using key engineering inputs, based on the AASHTO 1993 and 1998 supplement pavement design process. Accessible via the web and mobile devices Free no cost to use Based on AASHTO pavement design equations User-friendly Share, save, and print project designs Interactive help and resource links www.pavexpressdesign.com 28

Perpetual Pavement Design Software PerRoad is uses the mechanisticempirical design philosophy. The program couples layered elastic analysis with a statistical analysis procedure (Monte Carlo simulation) to estimate stresses and strains within a pavement. In order to predict the strains which would prove detrimental for fatigue cracking or structural rutting. 29 www.asphaltroads.org/perpetual-pavement

What does a P. P. look like? 30

Ya But, Ya But Does Asphalt Really Last? 31

I-90 W of Wall 860 TADT 32

I90 Cactus Flat W. 780 TADT WBL WBL EBL EBL 33

115 D.R. West 190 TADT 34

How it looks today $5.8M $34M 35