County Service Area 16 Shandon Water Rate Analysis

Similar documents
William Murray Jr., P.E. Public Works Director Katie Victoria, MPA Sr. Administrative Analyst

CHART EXAMPLES OF WATER RATES AND CHARGES OF MWD MEMBER AGENCIES AND THEIR SUBAGENCIES

Water Rate and Revenue Analysis Final Report

Water Rate Study 2015

WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY

Notice of Public Hearing

City of Stockton. Final Report Delta Water Supply Project: Water Rate and Financing Study. HDR Engineering, Inc. June 2009.

City Council Public Input Session Water / Sewer Rate Study. March 19, 2014

Water Resources Utility Rates Review

WESTERN HILLS WATER DISTRICT

Water Resources Utility Rates Review

TASK IV: ANALYSIS OF MILLBROOK SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM CONSUMPTION CHARGES AND SEWER CAPITAL ASSESSMENTS

Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Water Service Rates, Fees and Charges. How to Submit a Protest

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE DRAFT FINDINGS February 27, 2014

Proposition 1 Funding Opportunities for Los Angeles

Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Management Plan A Focus on Voluntary Actions to Improve the Sustainability of Our Water Supply

RATE SETTING AS A WATER CONSERVATION TOOL

PASO ROBLES GROUNDWATER BASIN: WATER SUPPLY FRAMEWORK, HISTORY, AND CURRENT CONDITIONS. CCVT Sustainable Ag Expo.

ORDINANCE NO. 92. WHEREAS, the District produces Title 22 Unrestricted recycled water for customers to use in accordance with state law; and

WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY FEE STUDY

INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT

Long Beach Water Department Fiscal Year 2018 Annual Budget Summary

CITY OF ST. HELENA AD HOC REVENUE SOURCE TASK FORCE WATER & WASTEWATER RATE STUDY MEETING 2

Overview and Background Information. Tualatin Valley Water District

Techniques for Developing a Rate Structure. Water & Wastewater Utility Operation and Management for Tribes

DRAFT REPORT City of Tracy Water Rate Study August 2017

AGENDA DOCKET FORM. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive update on the rate structure analysis and provide direction.

Los Angeles 3 rd Regional

Marina Coast Water District: A California Special District STATE OF THE DISTRICT

SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. Comprehensive Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Rate Study

AGENDA PACKET. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING December 12, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. Santa Margarita Community Room 2 Civic Center Drive Scotts Valley, California

FONTANA WATER COMPANY A : General Rate Case Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY FEE STUDY

APPENDIX C 2012 RECYCLED WATER FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC COMMENT RESPONSES

CHAPTER 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Reassessing Our Rate Structures: Including Conservation Rates & How to Make it All Work

CITY HALL. Tuesday, January 29, :00 P.M. AGENDA

Municipal Service Review

Montara Water and Sanitary District 2011 New Customer CIP and Water Capacity Charge. Presentation to Board April 21, 2011

Metropolitan Water District. July 25, 2013

Potable Water & Wastewater Element

Water and Wastewater Cost of Services Analysis June 2016

Final Report and Recommendations on Wastewater Rates, Fees, and Charges

Financial Services. SAWS Overview. Dan Crowley Director - Financial Planning. Rate Advisory Committee 8 January Our water. Our future.

THE PARTICIPANT. City of Paso Robles

Assessment. Appendix I: Water Supply Assessment

City of Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant. Redlands, CA LOCATION: Carollo Engineers; CH2M HILL MBR MANUFACTURER: COMMENTS:

2015 Water Resources Status Report

Proposed Poseidon Desalination Project Distribution Facility Options Workshop

F I N A L Water and Wastewater Charges Study

THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER CONSERVATION DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 INTRODUCTION

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT

A Review of the City of Santa Fe Water Conservation Rebate Program. Executive Summary and Recommendations:

Date: October 5, 2016 To: Public Works Commission From: Jon Gunnerson, Geothermal Coordinator Subject: Geothermal Rate Structure

CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT. Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council. Diana Langley, Public Works Director. Water and Wastewater Rate Study

DRAFT. Recycled Water Cost of Service and Rate Study Report. Napa Sanitation District

on potable water, recycled water and sanitation service rates

WATER AND WASTEWATER RATES. July 24, 2017 Public Works Commission Meeting

VILLAGE OF ALGONQUIN 2014 WASTEWATER FACILITY PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Alderpoint County Water District. Municipal Service Review

By Delbert Zerr, KRWA Consultant

Water Development Commission 6920 YELLOWTAIL ROAD TELEPHONE: (307) CHEYENNE, WY 82002

PRELIMINARY REGIONAL WATER IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN & ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS WASHINGTON COUNTY, UTAH

Marina Coast Water District. Marina City Counsel and Planning Commission Special Joint Meeting and Study Session April 29, 2014

Overview of Local Facilities. Integrated Resource Planning Advisory Committee

Consumer Price Index, Los Angeles area May 2018 Area prices were up 0.4 percent over the past month, up 4.1 percent from a year ago

Irvine Ranch Water District s Groundwater Banking Program

SECTOR ASSESSMENT: WATER AND SANITATION. 1. Sector Performance, Problems, and Opportunities

General Rate Case Application Information

WATER CONNECTION CHARGES: A TOOL FOR ENCOURAGING WATER EFFICIENT GROWTH

CITY OF COCOA, FLORIDA

Frequently Asked Questions About Water and Wastewater Rates (FY )

Public Presentation: Water in the Tri-Valley. August 29, 2018

CITY OF PITTSBURG DEVELOPMENT OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES

2019 Annual Review of Sewer Rates and Environmental Updates Under the Sewer & Watercourse By-law

City of Flushing. Water and Sewer Rates

Exhibit 1 City of Lake Oswego WMCP Progress Report Progress Report for Benchmarks Listed in the 2007 WMCP (Appendix E: Matrix 1 and 2)

Name of Project: Lake Dunlap and Wells Ranch Water Supply through Canyon Regional Water Authority

CHAPTER 2 POPULATION, LAND USE & WATER USE TRENDS

Introduction and Background

Boynton Beach Utilities

Comprehensive Cost of Service and Rate Design Study

CERTIFICATION AND FINANCING PROPOSAL

Sustainable Water Future for the City of Los Angeles

ALBANY WATER BOARD SCHEDULE OF RATE STRUCTURE FEBRUARY 1, 2009

Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

19 Total Estimated Water Supply (Line ) 733, , ,371.1 Total Estimated Water Supply in Acre-Feet 1, , ,449.

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BOULDER CITY, REPEALING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION NO TO INCREASE THE WATER SERVICE CHARGE

Water Rates in Santa Barbara County: February 2019

Utilities Enterprise Fund Summary

Agua Special Utility District (Agua SUD) Water Conservation Plan

PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM WATER SUPPLY EXACTION FEE

WRF Drought Webcast Series Financial Resiliency During Droughts

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES

Water Forum Questions & Answers Wednesday, August 9, 2017 Hart Park House Senior Center

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

Volume 1 Executive Summary

Financial Update a.) Approval of 2018 Financial Statement

20. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

Transcription:

County Service Area 16 Shandon Water Rate Analysis Prepared By: County Public Works December 2014

December 2014 Water Rate Analysis County Service Area (CSA) 16 Shandon, Water System Purpose The purpose of this report is to summarize the revenue requirements for the operations and maintenance of the CSA 16 water system and determine the appropriate water rate increase needed to generate those revenue requirements. Background The CSA16 water system was formed in 1972 and operates for the purpose of furnishing potable water to the residential, commercial and public customers in the community of Shandon. CSA 16 is located in the northeast portion of San Luis Obispo County. The CSA 16 water supply is the groundwater pumped from the Paso Robles Upper Salinas Groundwater Basin, the large basin underlying the region. Currently, CSA 16 water is supplied by two wells (identified as Wells #4 and #5) with a total pumping capacity of 800 gallons per minute (gpm). These wells are located near Clarke Park and are used to fill a 212,000 gallon water storage tank located east of Shandon. Water is distributed via gravity from the water storage tank, which regulates water pressure, through a network of four, six, eight and ten-inch pipes. A map of the CSA 16 water distribution system is included as Exhibit A. Water rates in Shandon have not increased in 20 years. The last increase was implemented in 1994 after CSA 16 entered into contracts for State Water. State Water CSA 16 has been paying for a 100 Acre Foot per Year (AFY) allocation of State Water since the early 1990s; however, a connection to the State Water pipeline in order to deliver the allocation does not exist. A project to connect to the State Water pipeline is currently in design and is expected to be competed in 2015. Construction of this connection will allow CSA 16 to access and utilize its existing 100 AFY allocation of State Water. The project involves construction of an underground turnout facility to connect the existing Shandon (CSA 16) Water System to the State Water Project pipeline. Turnout facilities will generally include flow control and isolation valves, flow meter electrical, monitoring and controls equipment, instrumentation piping and a containment vault. This connection will also require a treatment system upgrade from chlorine to chloramine water treatment. Construction of chloramine treatment upgrades at the existing CSA16 wells will allow for groundwater treatment to be compatible with State Water treatment and is anticipated to be completed concurrent with the connection to the State Water pipeline. Capital cost of constructing the project has come from a combination of CSA 16 reserves and the County General Fund. The CSA 16 fund has no debt; however, reserves will be at the minimum desired level of approximately $155,000 when the project is completed.

Operating costs related to the delivery of State Water are estimated to increase by approximately $33,000 annually. This will be partially offset by a reduction in power costs related to the pumping of groundwater from the wells. Power costs are expected to be reduced by approximately $11,000 annually. Water Consumption Table 1 shows the annual reduction in water use by the community over time. Consumption has decreased by 13% from the high point in fiscal year 2006/2007. The result of this reduction in consumption is that the revenue generated by the current rate structure is insufficient to cover the operating expenses of the system. This revenue shortfall has been slowly reducing the reserve balances in CSA 16. With the current drought conditions, it is assumed that future consumption will remain at current levels or could even reduce further with additional conservation measures. Thus, existing water use is assumed for the purpose of developing the new rate structure. The number of water accounts in CSA 16 increased dramatically in the early 2000s with development on the east side of Shandon. Water accounts increased by approximately 100 and have held steady around the current 345 accounts since that time. This increase in water accounts is the major reason water rates have not had to be increased for such a long period of time. No additional water connections to the CSA 16 system have occurred since 2006. Additional accounts are not anticipated absent any large development and the existing number of accounts is assumed for the purpose of developing the new rate structure. Revenue Requirements Table 2 presents a nine year actual revenue and operating expenditure history for CSA 16. This shows that the system has been running at a deficit since 2008 with the deficit reducing reserves in CSA 16. The bottom of Table 2 presents a pro forma operating expenditure estimate which shows what expenditures would have been with the delivery of State Water. The proposed revenue requirements assume the delivery of the full allocation of State Water and the reduced power costs related to pumping less groundwater. The proposed revenue requirements also include a 15% contingency which totals $37,500. The need for this contingency is threefold. First, it will provide funding for unanticipated expenditures of the system. This could be in the form of one time expenditures (i.e. equipment replacement) or increases in ongoing expenditures (i.e. the cost of State Water). Secondly, any unused contingency is available to fund pay as you go capital improvements. Finally, but not least important, is that the contract for State Water requires rates and charges to be set sufficiently to cover a 1.25 factor of the debt portion of the State Water bill. This works out to be approximately $15,000 annually. This is referred to as a debt coverage factor and provides bondholders of State Water bonds security that they will continue to be paid according to contract. The proposed revenue requirements total $287,500. The amount of revenue needed from water sales equals $240,800. Current water sales generate approximately $180,000 annually. Therefore, current water rates need to be increased by 34% to provide the necessary revenue requirements.

Water Rate Structure The rate table below shows the impact of the 34% increase on the water rates and presents the current and proposed water rates necessary to generate the revenue requirements from water sales. The current average monthly water bill for residential customers is $43.80. The proposed rate adjustment would raise the monthly average to $58.69. The recommended changes to the Basic Bi-Monthly Charge for Water Service represent an average increase of $29.78 ($14.89 per month). The adjustment will generate additional revenues of approximately $61,000 per year. This adjustment is required to cover the cost of ongoing operations and maintenance expenditures given the reduced water consumption in the community due to the drought and conservation efforts. The increase is also needed to fund increased costs related to the delivery of State Water to Shandon. Annually thereafter, rates would increase based on increases in the Consumer Price Index. This will ensure that only non inflationary rate increases are needed in the future. Additionally, the allowable quantities of water for tier levels 2 and 3 are being adjusted to further encourage water conservation and to bring them in line with other County operated water systems in the North County. A survey was mailed to the community to determine whether a large initial rate increase with smaller inflationary increases thereafter or a smaller phased increase over a longer period was preferable. The survey indicated the larger initial increase was the preferred option by 75% of the respondents. This option results in lower rates over the long term. Water bills are computed on a bi-monthly basis (every other month). The charge for water is based on the amount of water used, measured in hundred cubic feet. This is abbreviated as CCF. One CCF equals 748 gallons. Table 3 illustrates the proposed rate change to the Basic Bi-Monthly Charge for Water Service.

FY 12/13 FY 13/14 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 - Table 1 CSA 16 Shandon Water Consumption FY 03/04 FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 02/03 units (748 gals.)

TABLE 2 CSA 16 Shandon Water 9yr Actual Revenues and Expenses Actuals Pumped AF 157 163 160 158 146 135 144 150 142 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Proposed Water Sales 203,385 214,771 208,274 199,326 181,590 177,295 177,456 196,393 180,348 241,800 System Connection Fees 10,400 11,200 - - - - - - - - Water Availability 10,130 9,786 8,332 9,911 8,508 8,690 8,791 8,768 8,786 8,700 New Service - Water 7,567 11,382 - - - - - - - - Interest 16,989 23,753 18,195 8,204 2,587 1,336 1,602 1,370 964 - Other Revenues 12,605 24,986 14,284 12,895 8,596 1,965 11,390 (3,433) 32,433 37,000 Total - Revenues 261,076 295,878 249,085 230,336 201,280 189,285 199,240 203,097 222,530 287,500 O&M - Other 153,428 168,667 172,297 198,587 190,549 176,945 167,683 151,705 150,919 151,000 Power 12,407 14,615 14,891 17,317 15,232 15,096 15,679 16,871 16,144 5,000 State Water Allocation 51,997 40,309 49,908 58,987 45,146 67,364 67,147 58,346 61,234 94,000 Contingency 15% - - - - - - - - - 37,500 Total - O&M Expenses 217,832 223,591 237,096 274,890 250,927 259,405 250,509 226,922 228,297 287,500 Rev minus O&M Exp 43,244 72,287 11,989 (44,555) (49,647) (70,120) (51,269) (23,824) (5,767) - CSA 16 Shandon Water 9yr Pro Forma Expense Estimates w/state Water Delivery of 100 AF 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Proposed O&M - Other 153,428 168,667 172,297 198,587 190,549 176,945 167,683 151,705 150,919 151,000 Power (Pumping 100 AF less) 4,504 5,649 5,584 6,357 4,799 3,914 4,791 5,624 4,775 5,000 State Water Allocation 75,730 65,337 77,473 85,969 73,326 93,434 95,041 92,781 93,848 94,000 Contingency 15% - - - - - - - - - 37,500 Total - O&M Expenses 233,662 239,652 255,354 290,913 268,674 274,293 267,515 250,110 249,542 287,500 Rev minus Exp 27,414 56,225 (6,269) (60,577) (67,394) (85,008) (68,275) (47,012) (27,012) -

TABLE 3 Basic Bi-Monthly Charge for Water Service Level Allowable Quantity Current Rate Proposed Rate Current Proposed 1 0 CCF to 10 CCF * 2 3 11 CCF to 63 CCF Greater than 63 CCF 11 CCF to 16 CCF Greater than 16 CCF $50.00 Minimum Charge $25.00 Monthly Equivalent $67.00 Minimum Charge $33.50 Monthly Equivalent $3.00 Per CCF $4.02 Per CCF $4.00 Per CCF $5.36 Per CCF * (CCF is Hundred Cubic Feet or 748 gallons) All rates above shall be adjusted annually every January 1 st by the average of the percentage increases in the Consumer Price Index ( CPI ) for All Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers for all items for San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose and Los Angeles/Riverside/Orange Co. categories as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in October of each year with the allowable water quantities remaining unchanged.

EXHIBIT A